Home » Posts tagged 'Tony Swiericzuk'
Tag Archives: Tony Swiericzuk
Salt Lake Potash (SO4) Commencement of Commercial Scale SOP Evaporation
- Salt Lake Potash has completed construction of a commercial scale SOP brine evaporation pond at Lake Way
- Pumping of the high grade SOP brine from Williamson Pit has now commenced
- De-watering is expected to be finished during Q3 2019 ensuring the evaporation process will be underway during the summer months and provide the initial feed salts for the process plant
- Salt Lake Potash has commenced a Bankable Feasibility Study (BFS) for a commercial scale 200ktpa Sulphate of Potash development at Lake Way, targeting completion in Q3 2019
Salt Lake Potash Limited (Salt Lake Potash or the Company) is pleased to announce it has commenced pumping the Williamson Pit brine into a commercial scale Sulphate of Potash (SOP) brine evaporation pond (Williamson Ponds) at its Lake Way Project.
Construction of the Williamson Ponds has recently been completed, with pond dimensions of 2.5km by 0.5km. These ponds have been designed to receive the 1.2GL of high-grade SOP brine from the Williamson Pit mine, with de-watering of the pit now underway. The de-watering is scheduled to complete in Q3 2019.
Given the super-saturated nature of the Williamson Pit brines, precipitation of salts started immediately upon pumping into the evaporation pond. The Company will be able to harvest first salts from the Williamson Ponds which are expected to be utilised as initial feed stock for processing.
Salt Lake Potash’s Chief Executive Officer, Mr Tony Swiericzuk, said:
“It is very pleasing to see the high-grade Williamson Pit brines being pumped into the commercial scale SOP evaporation ponds. It’s a real milestone in the development of our Lake Way Project and a first in the development of an exciting new industry for Western Australia.
Importantly, construction of the Williamson Ponds has provided the team with invaluable data on both methodology and costs, which will feed into the BFS that is now well advanced and due to be completed during the September quarter.”
Link to Interview with Tony Swiericzuk as the de-watering of Williamson Pit commences
Having recently completed the Scoping Study for a commercial scale 200ktpa development at Lake Way, Salt Lake Potash has commenced the Bankable Feasibility Study targeting completion in Q3 2019.
For further information please visit www.so4.com.au or contact:
Tony Swiericzuk/Clint McGhie |
Salt Lake Potash Limited |
Tel: +61 8 6559 5800 |
Jo Battershill |
Salt Lake Potash Limited |
Tel: +44 (0) 20 7478 3900 |
Colin Aaronson/Richard Tonthat/Ben Roberts |
Grant Thornton UK LLP (Nominated Adviser) |
Tel: +44 (0) 20 7383 5100 |
Derrick Lee/Beth McKiernan |
Cenkos Securities plc (Joint Broker) |
Tel: +44 (0) 131 220 6939 |
Rupert Fane / Ingo Hofmaier / Ernest Bell |
Hannam & Partners (Joint Broker) |
Tel: +44 (0) 20 7907 8500 |
Forward Looking Statements
This announcement may include forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based on Salt Lake Potash Limited’s expectations and beliefs concerning future events. Forward looking statements are necessarily subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are outside the control of Salt Lake Potash Limited, which could cause actual results to differ materially from such statements. Salt Lake Potash Limited makes no undertaking to subsequently update or revise the forward-looking statements made in this announcement, to reflect the circumstances or events after the date of that announcement.
Competent Persons Statement
The information in this Announcement that relates to Mineral Resources is extracted from the report entitled ‘Significant High-Grade SOP Resource Delineated at Lake Way’ dated 18 March 2019. This announcement is available to view on www.so4.com.au. The information in the original Announcement that related to Mineral Resources was based on, and fairly represents, information compiled by Mr Ben Jeuken, who is a member Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (AusIMM) and a member of the International Association of Hydrogeologists. Mr Jeuken is employed by Groundwater Science Pty Ltd, an independent consulting company. Mr Jeuken has sufficient experience, which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity, which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Salt Lake Potash Limited confirms that it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in the original market announcement and, in the case of estimates of Mineral Resources, that all material assumptions and technical parameters underpinning the estimates in the relevant market announcement continue to apply and have not materially changed. Salt Lake Potash Limited confirms that the form and context in which the Competent Person’s findings are presented have not been materially modified from the original market announcement.
Production Target
The Lake Way Project Production Target stated in this announcement is based on the Company’s Scoping Study as announced on 13 June 2019. The information in relation to the Production Target that the Company is required to include in a public report in accordance with ASX Listing Rule 5.16 and 5.17 was included in the Company’s Announcement released on 13 June 2019. The Company confirms that the material assumptions underpinning the Production Target referenced in the 13 June 2019 release continue to apply and have not materially changed.
Tony Swiericzuk Chief Executive Officer of Salt Lake Potash (S04) talks about the results of their Scoping Study for their Lake Way Project on the Vox Podcast
Tony Swiericzuk Chief Executive Officer of Salt Lake Potash (S04) talks about the results of their Scoping Study for their Lake Way Sulphate of Potash Project in Western Australia.
Salt Lake Potash plans to build the most sustainable, most rewarding fertiliser project in the world by developing organic Sulphate of Potash (SOP) from the Goldfields Salt Lakes which are nine lakes totalling over 3,300km² of playa surface ideal for trench extractions in Western Australia.
(Interview starts at 26 minutes 55 seconds)
– @SaltLakePotash #SO4 CEO @TonySwiericzuk discusses the results of their Scoping Study for their #LakeWay Sulphate of #Potash Project in Western Australia on the @VoxPodcast with @SharePickers
Interview starts at 26 minutes 55 secondshttps://t.co/cgJQt1DcUB
— BrandUK (@Brand_UK) June 18, 2019
Salt Lake Potash #SO4 -Construction Begins on Australia’s First Commercial Scale SOP Evaporation Ponds
Construction Begins on Australia’s First Commercial Scale SOP Evaporation Ponds
|
Highlights:
- Following receipt of the final approval from the Department of Water and Environmental Regulation (DWER), construction and operation of the First Phase of Lake Way Evaporation Ponds (Lake Way Ponds) at Wiluna, Western Australia has begun
- Site support infrastructure for construction of the Lake Way Ponds is in place
- The Lake Way Ponds will be the first Commercial Scale on-lake Sulphate of Potash (SOP) evaporation ponds in Australia. The first phase will enable de-watering of the Lake Way Williamson Pit that contains the highest grade brine resource in Australia
- The initial ponds will have the capacity to hold the Measured Resource of 1.2GL of Williamson Pit brine at an average SOP grade 25kg/m3 which contains an equivalent of 32,000 tonnes premium SOP
- The utilisation of the Williamson Pit brine will accelerate Salt Lake Potash’s pathway to first production of SOP at Lake Way
Salt Lake Potash Limited (Salt Lake Potash or the Company) is pleased to announce that all permits have been received from the Department of Water and Environmental Regulation (DWER) for the Lake Way Ponds at Lake Way and construction has now commenced.
Salt Lake Potash’s Chief Executive Officer, Mr Tony Swiericzuk said: “It is a very exciting time for Salt Lake Potash as we begin construction on Australia’s first commercial scale on-lake evaporation pond system.
This is a key milestone for not only Salt Lake Potash but also for the creation of the new SOP industry within Australia.
We will continue to progress works at Lake Way on both the construction of the first phase of evaporation ponds and also on the exploration of the “whole of lake” development options which we believe will underpin a globally significant SOP operation.”
For further information please visit www.saltlakepotash.com.au or contact:
Tony Swiericzuk/Clint McGhie |
Salt Lake Potash Limited |
Tel: +61 8 6559 5800 |
Jo Battershill |
Salt Lake Potash Limited |
Tel: +44 (0) 754 036 6000 |
Colin Aaronson/Richard Tonthat/ |
Grant Thornton UK LLP (Nominated Adviser) |
Tel: +44 (0) 20 7383 5100 |
Derrick Lee/Beth McKiernan |
Cenkos Securities plc (Joint Broker) |
Tel: +44 (0) 131 220 6939 |
Jerry Keen/Toby Gibbs
|
Shore Capital (Joint Broker) |
Tel: +44 (0) 20 7468 7967
|
Background
Salt Lake Potash’s immediate focus is on the rapid development of the Lake Way Project, intended to be the first salt-lake brine Sulphate of Potash (SOP) production operation in Australia. Lake Way’s location and logistical advantages make it the ideal location for the Company’s first SOP operation.
Lake Way is located in the Northern Goldfields Region of Western Australia, less than 15km south of Wiluna. The surface area of the Lake is over 270km2. The northern end of the Lake is largely covered by a number of Mining Leases, held by Blackham Resources Limited (Blackham), the owner of the Wiluna Gold Mine. The Company’s Memorandum of Understanding with Blackham (see ASX Announcement dated 12 March 2018) allows for an expedited path to development at Lake Way.
Lake Way Evaporation Ponds – Overview
The Company has now received final approval from DWER for the construction and operation of the initial evaporation ponds for Lake Way and de-watering of the Williamson Pit.
Site support infrastructure at Lake Way has been installed enabling an immediate start on the construction works.
Salt Lake Potash is constructing Australia’s first commercial scale on-lake evaporation ponds for a Sulphate of Potash (SOP) project at Lake Way. The initial ponds will consist of:
· Two evaporation ponds:
(i) Kainite Harvest Pond 500m x 500m (25 Ha); and
(ii) Halite Pond 2,000m x 500m (100 Ha);
· A 2km long and 4m deep trench will also be constructed running parallel to the ponds which will provide additional
brine feed into the pond network;
· A 1.4km causeway from the Williamson Pit to the Kainite Harvest Pond; and
· Associated piping and pumping infrastructure.
Design
The design of the evaporation ponds has been led by Knight Piesold, a leading global engineering and consulting firm with extensive experience in evaporation pond design.
Both evaporation ponds will include 2m high perimeter berms with internal baffles to extend the flow path of the brine movement within the pond to optimise the evaporation process.
Construction
Salt Lake Potash is undertaking a wet hire and self-perform model for the construction of the Lake Way Ponds. This construction model allows fast track mobilisation and execution of the works, whilst providing the Company with critical hands on experience allowing testing and validating of all design criteria to de-risk the future on-lake construction.
The construction works for the pond berms involves the stripping of the sandy evaporite layer of material on the lake’s surface. A key trench will then be constructed at the upstream toe of the embankment. An excavator will borrow lakebed clays from adjacent to the embankment and spread the material within the embankment footprint to form the pond berm.
The fill will be progressively spread, air dried, rotated and mixed to bring the moisture content to an optimum level. Dewatering of the borrow pits will be conducted throughout the construction process to manage saturation levels of the fill.
The works are being completed with a number of specialized pieces of civil earthmoving equipment suited to the unique conditions, including amphibious excavators and low ground pressure equipment.
The Company has also established support infrastructure on Lake Way, comprising a site office, crib room, and full mechanical workshop with canopy capable of undertaking repairs to our fleet of equipment onsite without the need for demobilization to external repair facilities.
The initial Lake Way ponds will have a volume of 1.8GL which will be capable of capturing the total Williamson Pit Measured Brine Resource (1.2GL @ 25kg/m3 SOP equivalent).
On-going Work Program
The construction of the initial Lake Way ponds is planned to be completed by the end of Q2 2019. The de-watering of the 1.2GL of Williamson Pit brine is expected to commence towards the end of Q2 2019.
The information contained within this announcement is deemed to constitute inside information as stipulated under the Market Abuse Regulations (EU) No. 596/2014. Upon the publication of this announcement, this inside information is now considered to be in the public domain.
Competent Person Statement
The information in this Announcement that relates to Mineral Resources is extracted from the report entitled ‘Scoping Study for Low Capex, High Margin Demonstration Plant at Lake Way’ dated 31 July 2018. This announcement is available to view on www.saltlakepotash.com.au. The information in the original ASX Announcement that related to Mineral Resources was based on, and fairly represents, information compiled by Mr Ben Jeuken, who is a member of the Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy and a member of the International Association of Hydrogeologists. Mr Jeuken is employed by Groundwater Science Pty Ltd, an independent consulting company. Mr Jeuken has sufficient experience, which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity, which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Salt Lake Potash Limited confirms that it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in the original market announcement and, in the case of estimates of Mineral Resources, that all material assumptions and technical parameters underpinning the estimates in the relevant market announcement continue to apply and have not materially changed. Salt Lake Potash Limited confirms that the form and context in which the Competent Person’s findings are presented have not been materially modified from the original market announcement.
Salt Lake Potash (SO4) December 2018 Quarterly Report and Appendix 5B
The Board of Salt Lake Potash Limited (the Company or Salt Lake Potash) is pleased to present its Quarterly Report for the period ending 31 December 2018.
The Company is focussed on rapidly progressing the development of its Lake Way Project, intended to be the first salt-lake brine Sulphate of Potash (SOP) production operation in Australia.
Highlights for the quarter and subsequently include:
Native Title Land Access and Exploration Agreement Executed for Lake Way
Ø Salt Lake Potash and Tarlka Matuwa Piarku (Aboriginal Corporation) RNTBC (TMPAC) have entered into a Native Title Land Access and Exploration Agreement for Lake Way
Ø TMPAC consent has been received for the on-lake construction of the pond system for the dewatering of the Williamson Pit at Lake Way (Williamson Ponds)
Key Approval Obtained and Construction of Williamson Ponds Imminent
Ø Mining Proposal and Project Management Plans for the Williamson Ponds approved by the Department of Mines, Industry Regulation and Safety (DMIRS)
Ø Initial fleet of construction equipment mobilised to Lake Way and site preparation works being undertaken in preparation for imminent construction of the Williamson Ponds
Ø Detailed design of Williamson Ponds completed
‘Whole of Lake’ Resource Program for Lake Way Advancing
Ø Work well advanced to enable the Company to report:
- o a Mineral Resource Estimate for the lake bed brine and the paleochannel aquifer for the 100% owned Salt Lake tenements
- o upgraded Mineral Resource Estimate for the Blackham tenements
Ø ‘Whole of Lake’ Mineral Resource Estimate will enable the Company to examine larger production scenarios
Field Trials at Lake Way Confirm Salt Production Process
Ø Comprehensive field evaporation trials at Lake Way are successfully producing substantial volumes of potassium Harvest Salts validating the modelled salt production process.
Ø Field evaporation trials have produced over 2 tonnes of high grade Harvest Salts at Lake Way.
Ø Over 100,000l of brine from both high grade Lake Way playa brine and the super high-grade Williamson Pit brine have been extracted for the field trial and evaporated separately. Both brines have rapidly produced quality harvest salts amenable for conversion to Sulphate of Potash (SOP).
Ø Potassium Harvest Salts produced from the field trial will be processed at Saskatchewan Research Council (SRC), where a pilot plant will duplicate and refine the Lake Way process flow sheet, as well as producing further product samples for offtake partners.
Key Appointments Enhance Senior Project Development Team
Ø Highly regarded mining executive Tony Swiericzuk commenced as Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer of Salt Lake Potash effective 5 November 2018
Ø Three proven mining executives join Salt Lake Potash as leaders in the project development team:
o Peter Cardillo as Project Director – Processing and NPI
o Lloyd Edmunds as Project Director – Civil
o Stephen Cathcart as Project Director – Technical
Ø These appointments, along with other recent additions to the project execution team, bring diversified technical/studies, approvals, construction, operations, process infrastructure experience to the Company as it moves into rapid project development phase
Completion of A$13.0 Million Placement to Fund Activities at Lake Way
Ø The Company completed placement of 31.0 million new shares to raise gross proceeds of $13.0 million
Ø The Placement included 950,000 shares subscribed for by CEO, Mr Tony Swiericzuk, and 750,000 shares subscribed for by the Company’s Chairman, Mr Ian Middlemas
Ø The proceeds have enabled the Company to accelerate planned development activities at Lake Way, including mobilisation of construction equipment for the imminent construction of the Williamson Ponds and dewatering of the Williamson Pit
OVERVIEW
Salt Lake Potash is the owner of nine large salt lakes in the Northern Goldfields Region of Western Australia. This outstanding portfolio of assets has a number of important, favourable characteristics:
· Over 3,300km2 of playa surface, with in-situ clays suitable for low cost on-lake pond construction;
· Very large paleochannel hosted brine aquifers, with chemistry amenable to evaporation of salts for SOP production, extractable from both low-cost trenches and deeper bores;
· Excellent evaporation conditions;
· Excellent access to transport, energy and other infrastructure in the Goldfields mining district;
· Clear opportunity to reduce transport costs by developing lakes closer to infrastructure and by capturing economies of scale; and
· Potential for multi-lake production offers optionality and significant scale potential, operational flexibility, cost advantages and risk mitigation from localised weather events.
Salt Lake Potash’s immediate focus is on the rapid development of the Lake Way Project, intended to be the first salt-lake brine Sulphate of Potash (SOP) production operation in Australia. Lake Way’s location and logistical advantages make it the ideal location for the Company’s first SOP operation.
The Company’s long term plan is to develop an integrated SOP operation, producing from a number (or all) of the lakes. Salt Lake Potash will progressively explore each of the lakes with a view to estimating resources for each Lake, and determining the development potential. Exploration of the lakes will be prioritised based on likely transport costs, scale, permitting pathway and brine chemistry.
LAKE WAY PROJECT
Lake Way is located in the Northern Goldfields Region of Western Australia, less than 15km south of Wiluna. The surface area of the Lake is over 270km2.
Salt Lake Potash holds five Exploration Licences (one granted and four under application) covering most of Lake Way and select areas off-lake, including the paleochannel defined by previous exploration. The northern end of the Lake is largely covered by a number of Mining Leases, held by Blackham Resources Limited (Blackham), the owner of the Wiluna Gold Mine.
The Company’s Memorandum of Understanding with Blackham (see ASX Announcement dated 12 March 2018) allows for an expedited path to development at Lake Way.
Lake Way has a number of compelling advantages which make it an ideal site for Salt Lake Potash’s initial SOP operation, including:
Ø Utilisation of Blackham’s existing infrastructure (including camps, power and maintenance) to accelerate development.
Ø The site has excellent freight solutions, being adjacent to the Goldfields Highway, which is permitted for heavy haulage, quad trailer road trains to the railhead at Leonora and then direct rail access to both Esperance and Fremantle Ports, or via other heavy haulage roads to Geraldton Port.
Ø The Goldfields Gas Pipeline is adjacent to Salt Lake Potash’s tenements, running past the eastern side of the Lake.
Ø Access to Blackham’s existing Mining Leases provides advanced permitting pathway for early development activity, including the construction of the Williamson Ponds.
Ø Salt Lake Potash will construct the Williamson Ponds and dewater the existing Williamson Pit on Lake Way. The pit contains an estimated 1.2GL of brine at the exceptional grade of 25kg/m3 of SOP. This brine is the ideal starter feed for evaporation ponds, having already evaporated from the normal Lake Way brine grade, which averages over 14kg/m3.
Ø The high grade brines at Lake Way will result in lower capital and operating costs due to lower extraction and evaporation requirements.
Ø The presence of clays in the upper levels of the lake which are amenable to low cost, on-lake evaporation pond construction.
The Company is concurrently progressing the imminent construction of the Williamson Ponds, whilst also rapidly advancing a ‘whole of lake’ scenario, including mineral resource estimates, permitting and approvals, pilot plant process testwork and assessment of infrastructure and logistical options.
A number of key appointments have been made during the Quarter that support the rapid development of the Lake Way Project, bringing diversified technical, construction, operations, process infrastructure experience to the Company, including:
· Peter Cardillo as Project Director – Processing and NPI
· Lloyd Edmunds as Project Director – Civil
· Stephen Cathcart as Project Director – Technical
Salt Lake Potash has also engaged industry leading consultants to work alongside the Company’s internal experts for works related to the larger ‘whole of lake’ development of the Lake Way Project, including:
· WOOD – technical studies for a full scale commercial project
· Pendragon – environmental consultant
· Ad-Infinitum – pond process design
· Knight Piesold – Williamson Pond detailed design
· Cardno – on playa trench hydraulics
· SRC – process testwork and pilot plant
· Global groundwater – bore test pumping
· Hydrogeoenviro – bore water licensing
Having completed a placement to raise $13.0 million during the quarter and built a team with capability and track record of successfully developing and constructing numerous resource projects, the Company is well placed to take advantage of the benefits of the Lake Way Project and its broader portfolio of nine salt lakes.
Discussions are also ongoing with a number of offtake partners and the testwork currently underway at SRC will provide high-grade SOP product samples for testing by these partners.
Native Title Land Access and Exploration Agreement
In December 2018, the Company signed a Native Title Land Access and Brine Minerals Exploration Agreement (the Agreement) with Tarlka Matuwa Piarku (Aboriginal Corporation) RNTBC (TMPAC) covering the Lake Way Project area.
TMPAC entered into the Agreement with Salt Lake Potash on behalf of the Wiluna People who are the recognised Native Title Holders of the land covering the Lake Way Project area. TMPAC also provided consent for the total area required for the construction and operation of the Williamson Ponds.
The signing of the Agreement with TMPAC and receipt of TMPAC’s consent for the Williamson Ponds is a major milestone in the development of the Lake Way Project and positions Salt Lake Potash to accelerate the works program for the Williamson Ponds.
Approvals Advancing
The Company’s Mining Proposal and Project Management Plans for the Williamson Ponds were approved by Department of Mines, Industry Regulation and Safety (DMIRS) during the quarter, and a Works Approval licence was also submitted to the Department of Water and Environmental Regulation (DWER). These works include the construction of operational scale evaporation ponds and associated infrastructure including pond trenching to provide brine conditioning to manage the brine extracted from the Williamson Pit.
Salt Lake Potash has previously received environmental approval from the DMIRS to construct ponds totalling up to 133Ha (the Williamson Ponds), as well as ancillary infrastructure.
The Williamson Ponds will be the first operational scale SOP evaporation ponds built on a salt lake in Australia – an important part of the staged de-risking and development at Lake Way and across the Company’s portfolio of salt lakes in the Northern Goldfields Region.
A series of studies commenced during the quarter in support of the ongoing environmental approvals. These include flora and fauna surveys, climatology and hydrologic assessment, flood modelling and geotechnical investigations.
Mineral Resource Program
The Company has previously reported a Mineral Resource Estimate for Lake Way (Blackham tenements only). Work progressed during the quarter to enable the Company to estimate a ‘whole of lake’ Mineral Resource Estimate, including the remaining playa surface covered by Salt Lake Potash’s tenements and the paleochannel aquifer, which were not considered as part of the initial Mineral Resource estimate and provide significant short term upside to increase resources at Lake Way.
Estimation of a ‘whole of lake’ resources will enable the Company to consider larger production scenarios for Lake Way.
A program of 19 auger holes, test pits, trench testing, recovery testing, brine sampling and laboratory determination of hydraulic parameters has commenced and is expected to be completed in the current quarter. Results of these activities will provide inputs to the Mineral Resource Estimate for the playa surface.
Planning and initial works also commenced on defining the paleochannel resource under Lake Way.
By taking advantage of previous works in the area, the Company was able to identify and inspect three existing production bores drilled into the paleochannel. Each of the holes was inspected by downhole camera which showed that all three remain intact and, with some minor cleaning and redevelopment, are expected to be suitable for test pumping. Rehabilitation and test pumping is planned for the current quarter, and the results of this activity are expected to confirm the hydraulic parameters of the productive zone of the paleochannel and the brine grade. The data produced from the test pumping will be used as an input to the Mineral Resource Estimate for the paleochannel.
A gravity and passive seismic geophysical survey consisting of 22 lines and a total coverage of greater than 110 km was commissioned to define the location and form of the Lake Way paleochannel within the Salt Lake Potash and Blackham tenements. The work consists of a number of cross sections which are then combined to provide a 3D representation of the paleochannel. This work will be completed in the current quarter. When combined with the geological logs from previous work it is expected to be possible to define the extent of the brine hosting sediments and develop a volumetric understanding of the paleochannel, which in turn will inform the resource model.
Civil Construction – On-Lake Infrastructure
During the quarter, the Company progressed the first phase of on-lake development with completion of the detailed design of the Williamson Ponds to dewater the high grade Williamson Pit brine. This early works program will allow the fast-tracking of harvest salts in readiness for process plant commissioning.
Detailed engineering works during the quarter for the Williamson Ponds included further analysis of strength and permeability characteristics of lakebed sediments, and geotechnical parameters for final pond analysis and design. Other geotechnical design work undertaken included Cone Penetration Test (CPT) data analysis, trafficability assessment, access road analysis, seepage models, borrow pit assessments and development of the pond construction methodology. The geotechnical investigation and engineering works will expand in the current quarter for the larger ‘whole of lake’ scenario at Lake Way.
Surveying contractor, AAM Group set out the Williamson Pond design in readiness for construction commencement in the current quarter, and also commenced the Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) topographical survey flyover for the larger ‘whole of lake’ scenario.
Given the unique design and site conditions, the Company is now engaging with the specialist civil contracting market to select our contracting partners to build the on lake Williamson Ponds and dewater the Williamson Pit. In late December 2018, the Company mobilised initial construction equipment to Lake Way, with site preparation works being undertaken in preparation of the imminent construction of the Williamson Ponds.
The Company has also sort Expressions of Interest (EOI) from key civil contractors to participate in an Early Contractor Involvement (ECI) process for the larger ‘whole of lake’ development. To date, the Company has received positive feedback and acceptance from a number of major civil contractors.
Process Testwork
Comprehensive field evaporation trials at Lake Way are continuing to successfully produce substantial volumes of potassium Harvest Salts validating the modelled salt production process.
A major component of the feasibility study process for the Lake Way Project is to develop a brine evaporation and salt production model based on the brine chemistry of both Lake Way playa and Williamson Pit brines under local environmental (evaporation) conditions.
Initially, this model was based on a computer simulation generated by international brine processing experts Ad Infinitum, from known brine chemistry (from assays) and comprehensive public weather datasets. In this case the model was also informed by the Company’s unique database of more than 18 months of field evaporation trials at Lake Wells, reflecting similar chemistry and environmental inputs.
In the second stage of the model development the computer simulation was calibrated against and updated for the results of wind tunnel evaporation tests of Lake Way brines under laboratory conditions.
Thirdly, the model is now being further refined by establishing a site evaporation trial, where a scaled down version of an evaporation pond system is established on site and brine is evaporated under actual field conditions. Both brine chemistry and salt production are closely monitored.
The Lake Way Site Evaporation Trial (SET) was established in May/June 2018 and initial brine feed was gradually introduced from both the Williamson Pit (SOP resource grade 25kg/m3) and the Lake Way playa (SOP resource grade 14kg/m3) (refer to Note 1 for mineral resource estimate on Blackham tenements).
Over 100,000 litres of Williamson Pit and the Lake Way Playa brine has been fed into the SET pond system to date. Brine is sourced from a surface trench, for the Lake Way Playa brine, or direct from the Williamson Pit and introduced into a Halite Pond. As solar evaporation concentrates the brine, it progresses through a series of 5 ponds: two halite salt ponds, and then schoenite, kainite and carnallite salt ponds.
Harvested salt and brine samples are analysed at regular intervals through the evaporation process to gather data for model correlation. To date over 400 samples have been extracted and assayed at Bureau Veritas in Perth.
The results from the Lake Way SET to date demonstrate an excellent correlation to the salt production model.
This provides the Company with a very strong basis to continue development of the mass balance model and process flow sheet for the Lake Way Project.
It was found that halite salts begin to form almost immediately upon initial evaporation. This will shorten the overall salt production timeframe for the Williamson Pit brine. It may also offer the opportunity for faster construction of harvest pond infrastructure, utilising harvested halite salts for pavement.
The Lake Way SET has already produced over 2 tonnes of Potassium Harvest Salts (1.8 tonnes Lake Way Playa and 0.4 tonnes of Williamson Pit) and a further 5 tonnes are forecast to be harvested during ongoing evaporation trials.
From the test work to date, the Williamson Pit and the Lake Way Playa brines have produced excellent high grade Harvest Potassium Salts with an exceptional K grade of up to 10% and an overall high average K grade of 6.8%. This aligns very well with the grades that were observed during the Lake Wells SET’s.
This provides the Company with confidence that the Lake Way production model, process flowsheet and Harvest Salt product will produce a final high grade SOP product in line with the world leading SOP product of 53% K2O produced at Lake Wells.
The Company has engaged the world’s leading potash processing laboratory, Saskatchewan Research Council (SRC), to establish a pilot plant based on the process flow sheet for the Lake Way Project. The initial batch of harvest salts from Lake Way has been delivered to SRC and testwork is underway.
The pilot plant will validate and refine the Lake Way process flowsheet and also produce high-grade SOP product samples for offtake partners.
LAKE BALLARD
The Lake Ballard Project is located about 15 km north of Menzies. The playa is a significant regional landform with a surface area of 698km2. The geology of Lake Ballard is similar to that encountered at other lakes in the Company’s portfolio.
Surface Aquifer Exploration Program
Final elements of fieldwork undertaken to enable the estimation of a resource were completed at Lake Ballard during the quarter.
The Company commenced an auger drilling program in September 2018 to obtain insitu samples for geological logging, porosity measurement, specific yield testing and brine sampling. The holes were drilled using a track mounted auger rig, capable of drilling to between 15 – 20m depth depending on ground conditions.
Drilling was completed, with a total of 15 auger holes, from which 47 insitu samples from depths varying from 1m to 15m.
The core samples were collected and sent to Core Laboratories WA for analysis of hydraulic conductivity, total porosity and drainable porosity (Specific yield).
The Company also test pumped two trenches for 15 days and analysed data from the test pumping of 44 trial pits.
Results of the auger program and insitu sampling are in accordance with expectation and reported in full in Appendix 2.
The test pumping and trial pit data were analysed using known methodologies with the AQTESOLV analysis programme. This data will ultimately feed into a mineral resource estimate for the majority of the lake.
LAKE MINIGWAL
The Lake Minigwal Project is located in the Northern Goldfields Region of Western Australia approximately 80km south east of Laverton.
During the quarter extensive gravity geophysics was run over the various branches of Lake Minigwal as a preliminary investigation into the depth to basement and location of the paleochannel.
The purpose of the gravity survey was twofold, to identify the depth to basement across the lake and to identify the thalweg of the paleochannel as a precurser to the development of a drilling programme.
Whilst there is confidence that the main trunk drainage of the paleochannel passes beneath the Company’s tenements and that a large paleo-tributary that enters from the north and merges with the main trunk drainage beneath the eastern third of Lake Minigwal, the exact location is currently unknown.
The results are currently being processed, however preliminary analysis has identified the Thalweg of the paleochannel. Further modelling will be undertaken to refine the data response and to identify future areas for greater density of surveys.
SOP SAMPLE PRODUCTION
During the quarter, the Company completed confirmatory testwork at Fremantle Metallurgy’s mineral processing laboratory. The testwork, conducted by the Company’s process engineers, began the process of converting several tonnes of harvest salts collected from the Lake Wells SET into SOP samples. The process and equipment used was based upon the flowsheet previously tested by SRC.
The in-house work successfully tested some of the discrete unit operations in the flowsheet and generated a small amount of lake-derived SOP product for assessment of quality. The testwork has provided valuable inputs into the process flowsheet development and equipment selection for the Lake Way harvest salt testwork now underway at SRC. Importantly, the operation also provided the Company’s process team valuable hands-on experience in dealing with the subtle complexities in the operation of a saturated salt-brine process.
CORPORATE
During the quarter, the Company completed a placement to existing and new institutional and sophisticated investors in Australia and overseas for 31.0 million new ordinary shares of the Company, to raise gross proceeds of $13,000,000 (Placement). There was very strong demand for the Placement, an endorsement of the recent appointment of Tony Swiericzuk as CEO and also of the Company’s world class Sulphate of Potash project.
The cornerstone investor for the Placement was a significant international investment fund. Directors and senior management subscribed for a total of 2.4 million shares in the Placement, including 950,000 shares by the CEO, Mr Tony Swiericzuk, and 750,000 shares by the Company’s Chairman, Mr Ian Middlemas, which were issued in January 2019 following shareholder approval.
Proceeds from the Placement are being used to fund construction of the Williamson Ponds and dewatering of the Williamson Pit, as well as ongoing development of on-lake infrastructure, exploration and feasibility studies, and general working capital.
Having successfully raised the funds for project development at Lake Way, the Company significantly accelerated its activity and expenditure during the December quarter.
Note 1: Lake Way Mineral Resource Estimate (Blackham tenements only)
Sediment Hosted Brine – Indicated (94%)
Playa Area |
Lakebed Sediment Volume |
Brine Concentration |
Mineral Tonnage Calculated from Total Porosity |
Mineral Tonnage Calculated from Drainable Porosity |
||||||
K |
Mg |
SO4 |
Total Porosity |
Brine Volume |
SOP Tonnage |
Drainable Porosity |
Brine Volume |
SOP Tonnage |
||
(km2) |
(Mm3) |
(kg/m3) |
(kg/m3) |
(Kg/m3) |
(Mm3) |
(kt) |
(Mm3) |
(kt) |
||
55.4 |
290 |
6.9 |
7.6 |
28.3 |
0.43 |
125 |
1,900 |
0.11 |
31.9 |
490 |
Williamson Pit Brine – Measured (6%)
Brine Volume (Mm3) |
Potassium Conc. (kg/m3) |
Magnesium Conc. (kg/m3) |
Sulphate Conc. (kg/m3) |
SOP Tonnage (kt) |
1.26 |
11.4 |
14.47 |
48 |
32 |
Work is currently underway to enable the Company to report a Mineral Resource Estimate for the lake bed brine and the paleochannel aquifer for the ‘whole of lake’, which will enable the Company to examine larger production scenarios.
For further information please visit www.saltlakepotash.com.au or contact:
Tony Swiericzuk/Clint McGhie |
Salt Lake Potash Limited |
Tel: +61 8 9322 6322 |
Jo Battershill |
Salt Lake Potash Limited |
Tel: +44 (0) 20 7478 3900 |
Colin Aaronson/Richard Tonthat/Ben Roberts |
Grant Thornton UK LLP (Nominated Adviser) |
Tel: +44 (0) 20 7383 5100 |
Derrick Lee/Beth McKiernan |
Cenkos Securities plc (Joint Broker) |
Tel: +44 (0) 131 220 6939 |
Jerry Keen/Toby Gibbs |
Shore Capital (Joint Broker) |
Tel: +44 (0) 20 7468 7967 |
Competent Persons Statement
The information in this announcement that relates to Exploration Results for Lake Ballard is based on information compiled by Mr Ben Jeuken, who is a member Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy and a member of the International Association of Hydrogeologists. Mr Jeuken is employed by Groundwater Science Pty Ltd, an independent consulting company. Mr Jeuken has sufficient experience, which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity, which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Mr Jeuken consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.
The information in this announcement that relates to Process Testwork Results is extracted from the report entitled ‘Field Trials at Lake Way Confirm Salt Production Process’ dated 29 January 2019. This announcement is available to view on www.saltlakepotash.com.au. The information in the original ASX Announcement that related to Process Testwork Results was based on, and fairly represents, information compiled by Mr Bryn Jones, BAppSc (Chem), MEng (Mining) who is a Fellow of the AusIMM. Mr Jones is a Director of Salt Lake Potash Limited. Mr Jones has sufficient experience, which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking, to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Salt Lake Potash Limited confirms that it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in the original market announcement. Salt Lake Potash Limited confirms that the form and context in which the Competent Person’s findings are presented have not been materially modified from the original market announcement.
The information in this Announcement that relates to Mineral Resources is extracted from the report entitled ‘Scoping Study for Low Capex, High Margin Demonstration Plant at Lake Way’ dated 31 July 2018. This announcement is available to view on www.saltlakepotash.com.au. The information in the original ASX Announcement that related to Mineral Resources was based on, and fairly represents, information compiled by Mr Ben Jeuken, who is a member Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy and a member of the International Association of Hydrogeologists. Mr Jeuken is employed by Groundwater Science Pty Ltd, an independent consulting company. Mr Jeuken has sufficient experience, which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity, which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Salt Lake Potash Limited confirms that it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in the original market announcement and, in the case of estimates of Mineral Resources, that all material assumptions and technical parameters underpinning the estimates in the relevant market announcement continue to apply and have not materially changed. Salt Lake Potash Limited confirms that the form and context in which the Competent Person’s findings are presented have not been materially modified from the original market announcement.
Appendix 1 – Summary of Exploration and Mining Tenements
As at 31 December 2018, the Company holds interests in the following tenements:
Project |
Status |
Type of Change |
License Number |
Interest (%)
1-Oct-18
|
Interest (%)
31-Dec-18
|
Western Australia |
|||||
Lake Way |
|||||
Central |
Granted |
– |
E53/1878 |
100% |
100% |
East |
Application |
Application |
E53/2057 |
– |
100% |
South |
Application |
– |
E53/1897 |
100% |
100% |
South |
Application |
Application |
E53/2059 |
– |
100% |
South |
Application |
Application |
E53/2060 |
– |
100% |
Lake Wells |
|||||
Central |
Granted |
– |
E38/2710 |
100% |
100% |
South |
Granted |
– |
E38/2821 |
100% |
100% |
North |
Granted |
– |
E38/2824 |
100% |
100% |
Outer East |
Granted |
– |
E38/3055 |
100% |
100% |
Single Block |
Granted |
– |
E38/3056 |
100% |
100% |
Outer West |
Granted |
– |
E38/3057 |
100% |
100% |
North West |
Granted |
– |
E38/3124 |
100% |
100% |
West |
Granted |
– |
L38/262 |
100% |
100% |
East |
Granted |
– |
L38/263 |
100% |
100% |
South West |
Granted |
– |
L38/264 |
100% |
100% |
South |
Granted |
– |
L38/287 |
100% |
100% |
South Western |
Granted |
– |
E38/3247 |
100% |
100% |
South |
Granted |
– |
M38/1278 |
100% |
100% |
Lake Ballard |
|||||
West |
Granted |
– |
E29/912 |
100% |
100% |
East |
Granted |
– |
E29/913 |
100% |
100% |
North |
Granted |
– |
E29/948 |
100% |
100% |
South |
Granted |
– |
E29/958 |
100% |
100% |
South East |
Granted |
– |
E29/1011 |
100% |
100% |
South East |
Granted |
– |
E29/1020 |
100% |
100% |
South East |
Granted |
– |
E29/1021 |
100% |
100% |
South East |
Granted |
– |
E29/1022 |
100% |
100% |
Lake Irwin |
|||||
West |
Granted |
– |
E37/1233 |
100% |
100% |
Central |
Granted |
– |
E39/1892 |
100% |
100% |
East |
Granted |
– |
E38/3087 |
100% |
100% |
North |
Granted |
– |
E37/1261 |
100% |
100% |
Central East |
Granted |
– |
E38/3113 |
100% |
100% |
South |
Granted |
– |
E39/1955 |
100% |
100% |
North West |
Granted |
– |
E37/1260 |
100% |
100% |
South West |
Granted |
– |
E39/1956 |
100% |
100% |
Lake Minigwal |
|||||
West |
Granted |
– |
E39/1893 |
100% |
100% |
East |
Granted |
– |
E39/1894 |
100% |
100% |
Central |
Granted |
– |
E39/1962 |
100% |
100% |
Central East |
Granted |
– |
E39/1963 |
100% |
100% |
South |
Granted |
– |
E39/1964 |
100% |
100% |
South West |
Granted |
– |
E39/1965 |
100% |
100% |
Lake Marmion |
|||||
North |
Granted |
– |
E29/1000 |
100% |
100% |
Central |
Granted |
– |
E29/1001 |
100% |
100% |
South |
Granted |
– |
E29/1002 |
100% |
100% |
West |
Granted |
– |
E29/1005 |
100% |
100% |
Lake Noondie |
|||||
North |
Granted |
– |
E57/1062 |
100% |
100% |
Central |
Granted |
– |
E57/1063 |
100% |
100% |
South |
Granted |
– |
E57/1064 |
100% |
100% |
West |
Granted |
– |
E57/1065 |
100% |
100% |
East |
Granted |
– |
E36/932 |
100% |
100% |
Lake Barlee |
|||||
North |
Granted |
– |
E30/495 |
100% |
100% |
Central |
Granted |
– |
E30/496 |
100% |
100% |
South |
Granted |
– |
E77/2441 |
100% |
100% |
Lake Raeside |
|||||
North |
Granted |
– |
E37/1305 |
100% |
100% |
Lake Austin |
|||||
North |
Application |
– |
E21/205 |
100% |
100% |
West |
Application |
– |
E21/206 |
100% |
100% |
East |
Application |
– |
E58/529 |
100% |
100% |
South |
Application |
– |
E58/530 |
100% |
100% |
South West |
Application |
– |
E58/531 |
100% |
100% |
Lake Moore |
Granted |
Granted |
E59/2344 |
– |
100% |
Northern Territory |
|||||
Lake Lewis |
|||||
South |
Granted |
– |
EL 29787 |
100% |
100% |
North |
Granted |
– |
EL 29903 |
100% |
100% |
Appendix 2 – Lake Ballard Auger and Test Pit Results
Table 1: Auger Hole and Shelby Tube Porosity and Effective Porosity Results
HoleID |
Sample From |
Sample To |
Auger Core Total Porosity (% v/v) |
Shelby Tube Total Porosity (% v/v) |
Auger Core Drainable Porosity (% v/v) |
Shelby Tube Drainable Porosity (% v/v) |
LBAG001 |
1 |
2 |
44.2 |
10 |
||
LBAG001 |
3 |
4 |
49.8 |
12 |
||
LBAG001 |
6 |
7 |
44 |
9 |
||
LBAG001 |
11 |
12 |
||||
LBAG002 |
1 |
2 |
46.6 |
8 |
||
LBAG002 |
2 |
3 |
49.7 |
11 |
||
LBAG002 |
5 |
6 |
57.4 |
15 |
||
LBAG002 |
7 |
8 |
||||
LBAG002 |
9.5 |
10 |
35 |
8 |
||
LBAG003 |
1 |
52.6 |
12 |
|||
LBAG003 |
2 |
3 |
53.4 |
14 |
||
LBAG003 |
4 |
5 |
51.8 |
11 |
||
LBAG003 |
8 |
9 |
37.8 |
8 |
||
LBAG003 |
11 |
12 |
52.4 |
13 |
||
LBAG003 |
12 |
13 |
42.2 |
11 |
||
LBAG004 |
1 |
2 |
48.6 |
14 |
||
LBAG004 |
4 |
5 |
51.4 |
11 |
||
LBAG004 |
7 |
8 |
47.7 |
12 |
||
LBAG004 |
9 |
10 |
43.4 |
10 |
||
LBAG004 |
12 |
13 |
48.3 |
11 |
||
LBAG005 |
2.2 |
2.5 |
64.5 |
17 |
||
LBAG005 |
4 |
5 |
43.1 |
11 |
||
LBAG005 |
7 |
8 |
49.3 |
9 |
||
LBAG005 |
9 |
10 |
48.2 |
9 |
||
LBAG005 |
12 |
13 |
51.2 |
11 |
||
LBAG006A |
1 |
2 |
33.7 |
8 |
||
LBAG006A |
3 |
4 |
26.7 |
12 |
||
LBAG006B |
2 |
3 |
42.1 |
15 |
||
LBAG006B |
8 |
9 |
41.9 |
8 |
||
LBAG007A |
2 |
3 |
33.3 |
11 |
||
LBAG007B |
2 |
3 |
59.1 |
17 |
||
LBAG007C |
2 |
3 |
42.9 |
14 |
||
LBAG008 |
1 |
2 |
57.6 |
13 |
||
LBAG008 |
4 |
5 |
64.4 |
14 |
||
LBAG008 |
7 |
8 |
32.7 |
11 |
||
LBAG008 |
9 |
10 |
43.3 |
9 |
||
LBAG009A |
2 |
3 |
26 |
13 |
||
LBAG009B |
1 |
2 |
32.6 |
18 |
||
LBAG010 |
2 |
2.5 |
47.3 |
14 |
||
LBAG010 |
6 |
7 |
36 |
9 |
||
LBAG010 |
10 |
11 |
30 |
9 |
||
LBAG011 |
2 |
3 |
36.5 |
14 |
||
LBAG011 |
4 |
5 |
52.6 |
11 |
||
LBAG011 |
6 |
7 |
64.9 |
11 |
||
LBAG011 |
9 |
10 |
41.1 |
11 |
||
LBAG011 |
11 |
12 |
47.4 |
11 |
||
LBAG011 |
12 |
13 |
45.9 |
11 |
||
LBTT121 |
– |
1 |
52.5 |
13 |
||
LBTT121 |
– |
2 |
60.1 |
15 |
||
LBTT121 |
– |
3 |
35.2 |
7 |
||
LBTT121 |
– |
4 |
43.1 |
12 |
||
LBTT144 |
0.5 |
1 |
55.8 |
12 |
||
LBTT144 |
1.5 |
2 |
58.2 |
13 |
||
LBTT144 |
2.5 |
3 |
45.4 |
5 |
||
LBTT155 |
0.5 |
1 |
59.9 |
11 |
||
LBTT155 |
1.5 |
2 |
38.5 |
4 |
||
LBTT155 |
2.5 |
3 |
26.7 |
6 |
||
LBTT192 |
0.5 |
1 |
37.0 |
19 |
||
LBTT192 |
1 |
1.5 |
28.0 |
13 |
||
LBTT192 |
2 |
2.5 |
42.9 |
19 |
||
LBTT192 |
3 |
3.5 |
34.6 |
18 |
||
LBTT189 |
0 |
2 |
45.5 |
14 |
Table 2: Location Details for Auger Holes
Hole ID |
Easting |
Northing |
Depth (m) |
LBAG001 |
319177 |
6731097 |
12.7 |
LBAG002 |
318517 |
6731243 |
10.8 |
LBAG003 |
315539 |
6733652 |
13.0 |
LBAG004 |
311947 |
6733975 |
13.5 |
LBAG005 |
307467 |
6735256 |
14.5 |
LBAG006A |
303547 |
6733253 |
5.0 |
LBAG006B |
304066 |
6733890 |
9.0 |
LBAG007A |
301092 |
6737570 |
4.5 |
LBAG007B |
300749 |
6937786 |
4.0 |
LBAG007C |
300443 |
6737940 |
3.0 |
LBAG008 |
303139 |
6739647 |
10.0 |
LBAG009A |
299465 |
6741072 |
4.0 |
LBAG009A |
299174 |
6741053 |
4.5 |
LBAG010 |
294859 |
6741331 |
11.0 |
LBAG011 |
290355 |
6741953 |
15.0 |
Note: All holes are vertical, with an RL of approximately 370m. Depth indicates end of hole.
Table 3: Location Details for Test Pits
HoleID |
Easting |
Northing |
HoleID |
Easting |
Northing |
HoleID |
Easting |
Northing |
||
LBTT011 |
324848 |
6734075 |
LBTT075 |
318810 |
6731492 |
LBTT143 |
312850 |
6735049 |
||
LBTT014 |
324869 |
6734673 |
LBTT076 |
318936 |
6731596 |
LBTT144 |
312822 |
6734850 |
||
LBTT015 |
324875 |
6734875 |
LBTT077 |
319077 |
6731719 |
LBTT145 |
312797 |
6734660 |
||
LBTT016 |
324648 |
6734154 |
LBTT078 |
319224 |
6731844 |
LBTT149 |
313340 |
6733847 |
||
LBTT017 |
324447 |
6734155 |
LBTT079 |
319344 |
6731947 |
LBTT150 |
313323 |
6733652 |
||
LBTT018 |
324250 |
6734155 |
LBTT080 |
319491 |
6732075 |
LBTT156 |
313143 |
6732468 |
||
LBTT019 |
324047 |
6734155 |
LBTT081 |
319626 |
6732190 |
LBTT161 |
311165 |
6737839 |
||
LBTT020 |
323847 |
6734155 |
LBTT082 |
319787 |
6732309 |
LBTT162 |
311016 |
6735825 |
||
LBTT021 |
323650 |
6734155 |
LBTT083 |
319908 |
6732429 |
LBTT164 |
311995 |
6734079 |
||
LBTT022 |
323447 |
6734155 |
LBTT084 |
320056 |
6732555 |
LBTT165 |
308329 |
6738318 |
||
LBTT023 |
323249 |
6734154 |
LBTT087 |
320625 |
6733158 |
LBTT166 |
307463 |
6735246 |
||
LBTT024 |
323047 |
6734155 |
LBTT099 |
316105 |
6731412 |
LBTT169 |
307397 |
6731029 |
||
LBTT025 |
323838 |
6734261 |
LBTT100 |
316051 |
6731653 |
LBTT170 |
304632 |
6730314 |
||
LBTT026 |
323839 |
6734212 |
LBTT101 |
315997 |
6731866 |
LBTT171 |
300652 |
6730490 |
||
LBTT027 |
323845 |
6734107 |
LBTT103 |
315997 |
6731866 |
LBTT172 |
303546 |
6733252 |
||
LBTT028 |
323847 |
6734054 |
LBTT105 |
315815 |
6732626 |
LBTT173 |
306038 |
6733728 |
||
LBTT030 |
322735 |
6730202 |
LBTT106 |
315764 |
6732827 |
LBTT174 |
305593 |
6736408 |
||
LBTT031 |
322531 |
6730201 |
LBTT107 |
315704 |
6733021 |
LBTT175 |
306265 |
6737846 |
||
LBTT038 |
321137 |
6730178 |
LBTT109 |
315603 |
6733390 |
LBTT176 |
300602 |
6734536 |
||
LBTT043 |
320136 |
6730166 |
LBTT110 |
315538 |
6733588 |
LBTT177 |
298528 |
6738100 |
||
LBTT045 |
319738 |
6730151 |
LBTT112 |
315395 |
6733959 |
LBTT179 |
295300 |
6743180 |
||
LBTT046 |
320132 |
6730100 |
LBTT113 |
315314 |
6734154 |
LBTT180 |
290882 |
6743418 |
||
LBTT047 |
320136 |
6730206 |
LBTT114 |
315240 |
6734314 |
LBTT181 |
298362 |
6736492 |
||
LBTT050 |
318601 |
6728705 |
LBTT115 |
316375 |
6734039 |
LBTR004 |
318513 |
6731366 |
||
LBTT053 |
319201 |
6728663 |
LBTT116 |
316521 |
6734168 |
LBTR007 |
315240 |
6734314 |
||
LBTT054 |
319406 |
6728628 |
LBTT119 |
316962 |
6734577 |
|||||
LBTT055 |
319603 |
6728608 |
LBTT123 |
317399 |
6734975 |
|||||
LBTT056 |
319804 |
6728588 |
LBTT124 |
317694 |
6732520 |
|||||
LBTT057 |
320003 |
6728568 |
LBTT125 |
317839 |
6735385 |
|||||
LBTT058 |
320209 |
6728546 |
LBTT126 |
317986 |
6735519 |
|||||
LBTT059 |
320404 |
6728525 |
LBTT127 |
318137 |
6735660 |
|||||
LBTT060 |
320604 |
6728506 |
LBTT128 |
318282 |
6735794 |
|||||
LBTT061 |
320800 |
6728486 |
LBTT129 |
318428 |
6735928 |
|||||
LBTT063 |
321301 |
6728433 |
LBTT131 |
313153 |
6737408 |
|||||
LBTT064 |
321502 |
6728412 |
LBTT132 |
313132 |
6737224 |
|||||
LBTT065 |
321703 |
6728389 |
LBTT133 |
313105 |
6737027 |
|||||
LBTT068 |
319222 |
6730192 |
LBTT134 |
313082 |
6736829 |
|||||
LBTT071 |
318604 |
6730200 |
LBTT135 |
313051 |
6736634 |
|||||
LBTT072 |
318364 |
6731106 |
LBTT136 |
313029 |
6736432 |
|||||
LBTT073 |
318513 |
6731235 |
LBTT137 |
313004 |
6736240 |
|||||
LBTT074 |
318664 |
6731366 |
LBTT142 |
312874 |
6735244 |
APPENDIX 3 – JORC TABLE ONE
Section 1: Sampling Techniques and Data
Criteria |
JORC Code explanation |
Commentary |
Sampling techniques |
Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels, random chips, or specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling. Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used. Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public Report. In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has been done this would be relatively simple (eg ‘reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay’). In other cases more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (eg submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information. |
Sampling involved the excavation of test pits over the tenement area to a depth of up to 6mbgl or weathered basement whichever was encountered first. Two trenches were also dug to 3.5m depth.
A brine sample and duplicate were taken from each test pit and trench for analysis.
Samples were taken manually by initially rinsing out the bottle with brine from the pit or trench and then placing the bottle in the test pit or trench and allowing it to fill. Samples were analysed for K, Mg, Ca, Na, Cl, SO4, HCO3, NO3, pH, TDS and specific gravity.
Each test pit was geologically logged and a sample taken each 1m depth.
Test pumping entailed pumping from the trenches and test pits using a diesel driven submersible pump coupled to a level switch.
Water levels in the piezometer, test pits and trenches were logged manually and by pressure transducer. |
Drilling techniques |
Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (eg core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc). |
Hollow-stem auger holes drilled to basement or refusal, up to 15m. Core was collected from surface, geologically logged, sampled and set for lab analysis for porosity.
Once completed brine samples also taken from the open hole
Test pits were dug with an excavator
|
Drill sample recovery |
Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries and results assessed. Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure representative nature of the samples. Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material. |
Samples from the test pits were logged each bucket and a representative sample bagged.
100% of excavated sample was available for sampling. The ability to see the bulk sample facilitated the selection of a representative sample.
There is no relationship between sample recovery and grade and no loss of material as a result of excavation.
|
Logging |
Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies. Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc) photography. The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged. |
The geological logging is sufficient for the purposes of identifying variations in sand/ clay and silt fraction within the top 6m. For a brine abstraction project, the key parameters are the hydraulic conductivity and storativity of the host rock, which will be determined during test pumping of the trenches.
The logging is qualitative.
The entire pit depth was logged in every case.
|
Sub-sampling techniques and sample preparation |
If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core taken. If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc and whether sampled wet or dry. For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample preparation technique. Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages to maximise representivity of samples. Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in situ material collected, including for instance results for field duplicate/second-half sampling. Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being sampled. |
Whole core taken.
Not applicable, core drilling.
At all test pits brine samples were taken from the pit after 24hours or once the pit had filled with brine. The brine samples taken from the pits are bulk samples which is an appropriate approach given the long-term abstraction technique of using many kilometres of trenches to abstract brine.
All the samples taken were incorporated into a QA / QC program in which Standards and Duplicates were taken. The samples were taken in sterile plastic bottles of 250ml capacity. Excavated lake bed samples were sealed in plastic bags. For all brine samples (original or check samples) the samples were labelled with the alphanumeric code B800001, B800002 …
Lake bed samples were labelled with the test pit locator LBTT01, LBTT02 etc. and the depth from which they were taken.
|
Quality of assay data and laboratory tests |
The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or total. For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc, the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc. Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (ie lack of bias) and precision have been established. |
The brine samples were sent to Bureau Veritas Laboratories in Perth, WA with the duplicates being held by Salt Lake Potash. Every 10th duplicate was sent to Intertek, an alternate laboratory for comparison purposes.
No laboratory analysis was undertaken with geophysical tools.
Soil samples and laboratory derived hydraulic conductivity, total porosity and drainable porosity samples were analysed by Core Laboratories in Perth WA. All laboratories used are NATA certified.
|
Verification of sampling and assaying |
The verification of significant intersections by either independent or alternative company personnel. The use of twinned holes. Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols. Discuss any adjustment to assay data. |
Not applicable, no significant intersections, no verification required.
No twin holes were drilled.
All sampling and assaying is well documented and contained on Salt Lake Potash’s internal database
No adjustments have been made to assay data |
Location of data points |
Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource estimation. Specification of the grid system used. Quality and adequacy of topographic control. |
All coordinates were collected by handheld GPS.
The grid system is the Australian National Grid Zone MGA 51 (GDA 94)
The is no specific topographic control as the lake surface can essentially be considered flat.
|
Data spacing and distribution |
Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results. Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied. Whether sample compositing has been applied. |
The lake area contained within the Ballard tenements was calculated by digitising the lake surface and removing the area covered by the islands, the approximate area for the eastern portion of the lake is 359 km2, 205 km2 for the western portion. 181 test pits, 15 auger holes and 2 trenches were excavated over the eastern portion of the lake surface resulting in 1 excavation per 1.8 km2 providing a high density of investigation over this portion of the tenement.
However, western portion of the lake has had little to no work completed and is considered to have a low density of investigation suitable for determining an exploration target.
Sample compositing not applicable. |
Orientation of data in relation to geological structure |
Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of possible structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the deposit type. If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material. |
There are no structural or geological controls with respect to sampling the lake bed sediments. The variation in depth to basement does control the potential depth of future trench systems.
Geological influence on the brine is limited to the aquifer parameters of the host rock, namely the hydraulic conductivity, and porosity.
|
Sample security |
The measures taken to ensure sample security. |
Salt Lake Potash’s field geologists were responsible for bagging and tagging samples prior to shipping to the BV lab in Perth and the Salt Lake Potash offices. The security measures for the material and type of sampling at hand was appropriate |
Audits or reviews |
The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data. |
Data review included an assessment of the quality of assay data and laboratory tests and verification of sampling and assaying. No audits of sampling techniques and data have been undertaken. |
Section 2: Reporting of Exploration Results
Criteria |
JORC Code explanation |
Commentary |
Mineral tenement and land tenure status |
Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmental settings. The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area. |
The tenements covering Lake Ballard are all exploration licenses, held solely by Salt Lake Potash, are; E29/912, E29/913, E29/948, E29/958, E29/1011, E29/1021 and E29/1022
|
Exploration done by other parties |
Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties. |
A large amount of historical exploration work has been undertaken surrounding Lake Ballard focusing on gold, nickel and uranium. There has been limited exploration on the lake surface with most exploration associated with uranium exploration in the upper 10 m. Soil sampling was undertaken on the lake, as well as a number of geophysical surveys and shallow drilling activities. The Company has reviewed multiple publicly available documents to provide an understanding of the geology and hydrogeology in the Lake Ballard paleodrainage. |
Geology |
Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation. |
The deposit is a salt-lake brine deposit.
The lake setting is typical of a Western Australian palaeovalley environment. Ancient hydrological systems have incised palaeovalleys into Archaean basement rocks, which were then infilled by Tertiary-aged sediments typically comprising a coarse-grained fluvial basal sand overlaid by palaeovalley clay with some coarser grained interbeds. The clay is overlaid by recent Cainozoic material including lacustrine sediment, calcrete, evaporite and aeolian deposits. |
Drill hole Information |
A summary of all information material to the understanding of the exploration results including a tabulation of the following information for all Material drill holes: o easting and northing of the drill hole collar o elevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevation above sea level in metres) of the drill hole collar o dip and azimuth of the hole o down hole length and interception depth o hole length. If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that the information is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from the understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly explain why this is the case. |
Hollow-stem auger holes were completed along with test pits and trenches were excavated on the lake surface.
All test pit and trench details and locations of all data points are presented in the report. |
Data aggregation methods |
In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques, maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (eg cutting of high grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material and should be stated. Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high grade results and longer lengths of low grade results, the procedure used for such aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of such aggregations should be shown in detail. The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values should be clearly stated. |
Within the salt-lake extent no low-grade cut-off or high-grade capping has been implemented due to the consistent nature of the brine assay data.
Test pit and trench data aggregation comprised calculation of a hydraulic conductivity, transmissivity and drainable porosity for the whole sequence.
|
Relationship between mineralisation widths and intercept lengths |
These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of Exploration Results. If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is known, its nature should be reported. If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there should be a clear statement to this effect (eg ‘down hole length, true width not known’). |
The chemical analysis from each of the test pits and auger holes has shown the that the brine resource is consistent and continuous through the full thickness of the Lake Playa sediments unit. The unit is flat lying all auger holes were excavated into the lake sediments to a depth of 15m or basement, the intersected depth is equivalent to the vertical depth and the thickness of mineralisation.
|
Diagrams |
Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of intercepts should be included for any significant discovery being reported These should include, but not be limited to a plan view of drill hole collar locations and appropriate sectional views. |
All location maps and sections are contained within the body of the ASX Announcement available at www.saltlakepotash.com.au. |
Balanced reporting |
Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not practicable, representative reporting of both low and high grades and/or widths should be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of Exploration Results. |
All results have been included in the body of the report.
|
Other substantive exploration data |
Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be reported including (but not limited to): geological observations; geophysical survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples – size and method of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock characteristics; potential deleterious or contaminating substances. |
All material exploration data has been reported. |
Further work |
The nature and scale of planned further work (eg tests for lateral extensions or depth extensions or large-scale step-out drilling). Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions, including the main geological interpretations and future drilling areas, provided this information is not commercially sensitive. |
· Further work is planned at the western end of the lake bed in 2019 and a maiden mineral resource estimate will be prepared for Lake Ballard.
|
END
Mining exploration entity and oil and gas exploration entity quarterly report
Introduced 01/07/96 Origin Appendix 8 Amended 01/07/97, 01/07/98, 30/09/01, 01/06/10, 17/12/10, 01/05/13, 01/09/16
Name of entity |
||
Salt Lake Potash Limited |
||
ABN |
Quarter ended (“current quarter”) |
|
98 117 085 748 |
31 December 2018 |
Consolidated statement of cash flows |
Current quarter $A’000 |
Year to date |
||
1. |
Cash flows from operating activities |
|||
1.1 |
Receipts from customers |
|||
1.2 |
Payments for |
(1,664) |
(3,298) |
|
(a) exploration & evaluation |
||||
(b) development |
– |
– |
||
(c) production |
– |
– |
||
(d) staff costs |
(864) |
(1,474) |
||
(e) administration and corporate costs |
(280) |
(461) |
||
1.3 |
Dividends received (see note 3) |
– |
– |
|
1.4 |
Interest received |
19 |
53 |
|
1.5 |
Interest and other costs of finance paid |
– |
– |
|
1.6 |
Income taxes paid |
– |
– |
|
1.7 |
Research and development refunds |
– |
– |
|
1.8 |
Other (provide details if material) |
(302) |
(526) |
|
1.9 |
Net cash from / (used in) operating activities |
(3,091) |
(5,706) |
|
2. |
Cash flows from investing activities |
(138) |
(260) |
|
2.1 |
Payments to acquire: |
|||
(a) property, plant and equipment |
||||
(b) tenements (see item 10) |
– |
– |
||
(c) investments |
– |
– |
||
(d) other non-current assets |
– |
– |
||
2.2 |
Proceeds from the disposal of: |
– |
– |
|
(a) property, plant and equipment |
||||
(b) tenements (see item 10) |
– |
– |
||
(c) investments |
– |
– |
||
(d) other non-current assets |
– |
– |
||
2.3 |
Cash flows from loans to other entities |
– |
– |
|
2.4 |
Dividends received (see note 3) |
– |
– |
|
2.5 |
Other (provide details if material) |
– |
– |
|
2.6 |
Net cash from / (used in) investing activities |
(138) |
(260) |
|
3. |
Cash flows from financing activities |
13,000 |
13,000 |
|
3.1 |
Proceeds from issues of shares |
|||
3.2 |
Proceeds from issue of convertible notes |
– |
– |
|
3.3 |
Proceeds from exercise of share options |
– |
– |
|
3.4 |
Transaction costs related to issues of shares, convertible notes or options |
(715) |
(715) |
|
3.5 |
Proceeds from borrowings |
– |
– |
|
3.6 |
Repayment of borrowings |
– |
– |
|
3.7 |
Transaction costs related to loans and borrowings |
– |
– |
|
3.8 |
Dividends paid |
– |
– |
|
3.9 |
Other (provide details if material) |
– |
– |
|
3.10 |
Net cash from / (used in) financing activities |
12,285 |
12,285 |
|
4. |
Net increase / (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents for the period |
2,972 |
5,709 |
|
4.1 |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|||
4.2 |
Net cash from / (used in) operating activities (item 1.9 above) |
(3,091) |
(5,706) |
|
4.3 |
Net cash from / (used in) investing activities (item 2.6 above) |
(138) |
(260) |
|
4.4 |
Net cash from / (used in) financing activities (item 3.10 above) |
12,285 |
12,285 |
|
4.5 |
Effect of movement in exchange rates on cash held |
– |
– |
|
4.6 |
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
12,028 |
12,028 |
|
5. |
Reconciliation of cash and cash equivalents |
Current quarter |
Previous quarter |
5.1 |
Bank balances |
2,901 |
1,259 |
5.2 |
Call deposits |
9,127 |
1,713 |
5.3 |
Bank overdrafts |
– |
– |
5.4 |
Other (provide details) |
– |
– |
5.5 |
Cash and cash equivalents at end of quarter (should equal item 4.6 above) |
12,028 |
2,972 |
6. |
Payments to directors of the entity and their associates |
Current quarter |
6.1 |
Aggregate amount of payments to these parties included in item 1.2 |
(175) |
6.2 |
Aggregate amount of cash flow from loans to these parties included in item 2.3 |
– |
6.3 |
Include below any explanation necessary to understand the transactions included in items 6.1 and 6.2 |
|
Payments include salaries, director and consulting fees, superannuation and provision of corporate, administration services, and a fully serviced office.
|
7. |
Payments to related entities of the entity and their associates |
Current quarter |
7.1 |
Aggregate amount of payments to these parties included in item 1.2 |
– |
7.2 |
Aggregate amount of cash flow from loans to these parties included in item 2.3 |
– |
7.3 |
Include below any explanation necessary to understand the transactions included in items 7.1 and 7.2 |
|
Not applicable.
|
8. |
Financing facilities available |
Total facility amount at quarter end |
Amount drawn at quarter end |
8.1 |
Loan facilities |
– |
– |
8.2 |
Credit standby arrangements |
– |
– |
8.3 |
Other (please specify) |
– |
– |
8.4 |
Include below a description of each facility above, including the lender, interest rate and whether it is secured or unsecured. If any additional facilities have been entered into or are proposed to be entered into after quarter end, include details of those facilities as well. |
||
Not applicable
|
9. |
Estimated cash outflows for next quarter |
$A’000 |
9.1 |
Exploration and evaluation |
2,400 |
9.2 |
Development |
1,500 |
9.3 |
Production |
– |
9.4 |
Staff costs |
1,100 |
9.5 |
Administration and corporate costs |
350 |
9.6 |
Other (provide details if material) |
100 |
9.7 |
Total estimated cash outflows |
5,450 |
10. |
Changes in tenements |
Tenement reference and location |
Nature of interest |
Interest at beginning of quarter |
Interest at end of quarter |
10.1 |
Interests in mining tenements and petroleum tenements lapsed, relinquished or reduced |
Refer to Appendix 1 |
|||
10.2 |
Interests in mining tenements and petroleum tenements acquired or increased |
Compliance statement
1 This statement has been prepared in accordance with accounting standards and policies which comply with Listing Rule 19.11A.
2 This statement gives a true and fair view of the matters disclosed.
Sign here: …………………………………………………… Date: 31 January 2019
(Director/Company secretary)
Print name: Clint McGhie
Notes
1. The quarterly report provides a basis for informing the market how the entity’s activities have been financed for the past quarter and the effect on its cash position. An entity that wishes to disclose additional information is encouraged to do so, in a note or notes included in or attached to this report.
2. If this quarterly report has been prepared in accordance with Australian Accounting Standards, the definitions in, and provisions of, AASB 6: Exploration for and Evaluation of Mineral Resources and AASB 107: Statement of Cash Flows apply to this report. If this quarterly report has been prepared in accordance with other accounting standards agreed by ASX pursuant to Listing Rule 19.11A, the corresponding equivalent standards apply to this report.
3. Dividends received may be classified either as cash flows from operating activities or cash flows from investing activities, depending on the accounting policy of the entity.
END
Salt Lake Potash #SO4 – Field trials at Lake Way confirm Salt production process
Salt Lake Potash #SO4 – Field trials at Lake Way confirm Salt production process
Highlights:
- Comprehensive field evaporation trials at Lake Way are successfully producing substantial volumes of potassium Harvest Salts validating the modelled salt production process.
- Field evaporation trials have to date produced over 2 tonnes of high grade Harvest Salts at Lake Way.
- Over 100,000l of brine from both high grade Lake Way playa brine and the super high-grade Williamson Pit brine have been extracted for the field trial and evaporated separately. Both brines have rapidly produced quality harvest salts amenable for conversion to Sulphate of Potash (SOP).
- Potassium Harvest Salts produced from the field trial will be processed at Saskatchewan Research Council (SRC), where a pilot plant will duplicate and refine the Lake Way process flow sheet, as well as producing further product samples for offtake partners.
Salt Lake Potash Limited (Salt Lake Potash or the Company) is pleased to announce successful progress from the Lake Way Site Evaporation Trials (Lake Way SET)
The Company is focused on rapidly progressing the development of the Lake Way Project to become the first Sulphate of Potash (SOP) production operation in Australia. Lake Way has the highest grade SOP brine resource in Australia and the best infrastructure solution of potential Australian brine SOP producers.
A major component of the feasibility study process for the Lake Way Project is to develop a brine evaporation and salt production model based on the brine chemistry of both Lake Way playa and Williamson Pit brines under local environmental (evaporation) conditions.
Initially, this model was based on a computer simulation generated by international brine processing experts Ad Infinitum, from known brine chemistry (from assays) and comprehensive public weather datasets. In this case the model was also informed by the Company’s unique database of more than 18 months of field evaporation trials at Lake Wells, reflecting similar chemistry and environmental inputs.
In the second stage of the model development the computer simulation was calibrated against and updated for the results of wind tunnel evaporation tests of Lake Way brines under laboratory conditions.
Thirdly, the model is now being further refined by establishing a site evaporation trial, where a scaled down version of an evaporation pond system is established on site and brine is evaporated under actual field conditions. Both brine chemistry and salt production are closely monitored.
The Lake Way SET was established in May/June 2018 and initial brine feed was gradually introduced from both the Williamson Pit (SOP resource grade 25kg/m3) and the Lake Way playa (SOP resource grade 14kg/m3) (refer Note 1 for full mineral resource estimate).
Over 100,000 litres of Williamson Pit and the Lake Way Playa brine has been fed into the SET pond system to date.
Brine is sourced from a surface trench, for the Lake Way Playa brine, or direct from the Williamson Pit and introduced into a Halite Pond. As solar evaporation concentrates the brine, it progresses through a series of 5 ponds: two halite salt ponds, and then schoenite, kainite and carnallite salt ponds.
Harvested salt and brine samples are analysed at regular intervals through the evaporation process to gather data for model correlation. To date over 400 samples have been extracted and assayed at Bureau Veritas in Perth.
Refer to Figures 4 and 5 in the ASX version of this Announcement available on the Company’s website (www.saltlakepotash.com.au) which set out the results from the Lake Way SET to date, demonstrating an excellent correlation to the salt production model.
This provides the Company with a very strong basis to continue development of the mass balance model and process flow sheet for the Lake Way Project.
It was found that halite salts begin to form almost immediately upon initial evaporation of the Williamson Pit brine. This will shorten the overall salt production timeframe for the Williamson Pit brine. It may also offer the opportunity for faster construction of harvest pond infrastructure, utilising harvested halite salts for pavement.
The Lake Way SET has already produced over 2 tonnes of Potassium Harvest Salts (1.8 tonnes Lake Way Playa and 0.4 tonnes of Williamson Pit) and a further 5 tonnes are forecast to be harvested during ongoing evaporation trails.
From the test work to date, the Williamson Pit and the Lake Way Playa brines have produced excellent high grade Harvest Potassium Salts with an exceptional K grade of up to 10% and an overall high average K grade of 6.8%. This aligns very well with the grades that were observed during the Lake Wells SET’s.
This provides the Company with confidence that the Lake Way production model, process flowsheet and Harvest Salt product will produce a final high grade SOP product in line with the world leading SOP product of 53% K2O produced at Lake Wells.
Process Plant Flow Sheet Validation
The Company has engaged the world’s leading potash processing laboratory, Saskatchewan Research Council (SRC), to establish a pilot plant based on the process flow sheet for the Lake Way Project. The initial batch of harvest salts from Lake Way has been delivered to SRC and testwork is underway.
The pilot plant will validate and refine the Lake Way process flowsheet and also produce high-grade SOP product samples for offtake partners.
Salt Lake Potash’s Chief Executive Officer, Mr Tony Swiericzuk said: “I am very pleased with the continued development progress the project team is achieving at Lake Way. The initial salt harvest from the Lake Way SET is a significant milestone. It validates our production model and allows us to refine the process parameters for plant design, as well as providing feed for the pilot plant. In parallel with the progress of plant design, rapid project development continues with site access construction underway and the whole of lake resource definition well advanced.”
For further information please visit www.saltlakepotash.com.au or contact:
Tony Swiericzuk/Clint McGhie |
Salt Lake Potash Limited |
Tel: +61 8 9322 6322 |
Jo Battershill |
Salt Lake Potash Limited |
Tel: +44 (0) 20 7478 3900 |
Colin Aaronson/Richard Tonthat/Ben Roberts |
Grant Thornton UK LLP (Nominated Adviser) |
Tel: +44 (0) 20 7383 5100 |
Derrick Lee/Beth McKiernan |
Cenkos Securities plc (Joint Broker) |
Tel: +44 (0) 131 220 6939 |
Jerry Keen/Toby Gibbs |
Shore Capital (Joint broker) |
Tel: +44 (0) 20 7468 7967 |
Note 1: Lake Way Mineral Resource Estimate (Blackham tenements only)
Sediment Hosted Brine – Indicated (94%)
Playa Area |
Lakebed Sediment Volume |
Brine Concentration |
Mineral Tonnage Calculated from Total Porosity |
Mineral Tonnage Calculated from Drainable Porosity |
||||||
K |
Mg |
SO4 |
Total Porosity |
Brine Volume |
SOP Tonnage |
Drainable Porosity |
Brine Volume |
SOP Tonnage |
||
(km2) |
(Mm3) |
(kg/m3) |
(kg/m3) |
(Kg/m3) |
(Mm3) |
(kt) |
(Mm3) |
(kt) |
||
55.4 |
290 |
6.9 |
7.6 |
28.3 |
0.43 |
125 |
1,900 |
0.11 |
31.9 |
490 |
Williamson Pit Brine – Measured (6%)
Brine Volume (Mm3) |
Potassium Conc. (kg/m3) |
Magnesium Conc. (kg/m3) |
Sulphate Conc. |
SOP Tonnage (kt) |
1.26 |
11.4 |
14.47 |
48 |
32 |
Work is currently underway to enable the Company to report a Mineral Resource Estimate for the lake bed brine and the paleochannel aquifer for the ‘whole of lake’, which will enable the Company to examine larger production options.
Competent Person Statement
The information in this report that relates to Process Testwork Results is based on, and fairly represents, information compiled by Mr Bryn Jones, BAppSc (Chem), MEng (Mining) who is a Fellow of the AusIMM. Mr Jones is a Director of Salt Potash Limited. Mr Jones has sufficient experience, which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking, to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Mr Jones consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.
The information in this Announcement that relates to Mineral Resources is extracted from the report entitled ‘Scoping Study for Low Capex, High Margin Demonstration Plant at Lake Way’ dated 31 July 2018. This announcement is available to view on www.saltlakepotash.com.au. The information in the original ASX Announcement that related to Mineral Resources was based on, and fairly represents, information compiled by Mr Ben Jeuken, who is a member Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy and a member of the International Association of Hydrogeologists. Mr Jeuken is employed by Groundwater Science Pty Ltd, an independent consulting company. Mr Jeuken has sufficient experience, which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity, which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Salt Lake Potash Limited confirms that it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in the original market announcement and, in the case of estimates of Mineral Resources, that all material assumptions and technical parameters underpinning the estimates in the relevant market announcement continue to apply and have not materially changed. Salt Lake Potash Limited confirms that the form and context in which the Competent Person’s findings are presented have not been materially modified from the original market announcement.
Appendix A: JORC Table One
Section 1: Sampling Techniques and Data
Criteria |
JORC Code explanation |
Commentary |
Sampling techniques |
· Nature and quality of sampling (e.g. cut channels, random chips, or specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as downhole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc.). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling. · Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample presentively and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used. · Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public Report. · In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has been done, this would be relatively simple (e.g. ‘reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay’). In other cases, more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (e.g. submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information. |
Sampling involved extraction of small, representative samples of brine from solar ponds into 50ml or 250ml clean bottles. The solar ponds consist of re-purposed temporary above-ground swimming pools and HDPE aquaculture tubs. These solar ponds were filled with brine drawn from either the Williamson Pit directly or from Lake Way Playa Brine from a 4m deep test pit excavated next to the trial. Brine samples were taken from each solar evaporation pond regularly and routinely during the solar evaporation process. Brine samples were taken manually by initially rinsing out the sample bottle with brine from the source then filling the bottle. Samples were analysed for K, Mg, Ca, Na, Cl, SO4, TDS and specific gravity. The temperature and pressure in each pond were logged electronically with piezometers. Once the brine in a particular solar pond had concentrated to pre-determined point it was pumped to another solar pond downstream in the process. Salt was then extracted from the drained solar pond. Harvested salt is then crushed, either by hand or using a small jaw crusher to 100% passing 25mm, where the typical particle size is <5mm. The crushed salt was then coned and quartered multiple times until a 250g representative salt sample was obtained. Brine is a homogenous fluid below the surface, while salt samples are cone and quartered to provide a homogenous sample. |
Drilling techniques |
· Drill type (e.g. core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc.) and details (e.g. core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc.). |
No drilling was undertaken during the site evaporation trial.
|
Drill sample recovery |
· Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries and results assessed. · Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure representative nature of the samples. · Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material. |
No core was recovered from the site evaporation trial. Brine samples taken from the ponds, were sampled from beneath the surface of the ponds, thus were representative of the entire pond as the ponds are small enough to act as a homogeneous liquid bodies. Salt samples were crushed, coned and quartered to ensure sample representativeness. The crushing and homogenisation lowers the risk of preferential loss/gain of one size fraction over another. |
Logging |
· Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies. · Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc.) photography. · The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged. |
No logging was undertaken on the site evaporation trial
|
Sub-sampling techniques and sample preparation |
· If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core taken. · If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc. and whether sampled wet or dry. · For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample preparation technique. · Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages to maximise representivity of samples. · Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the insitu material collected, including for instance results for field duplicate/second-half sampling. · Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being sampled. |
Not applicable, no drilling was undertaken during the site evaporation trial. Not applicable, no drilling was undertaken during the site evaporation trial. The samples were taken in sterile plastic bottles of 50ml or 250ml capacity. Brine is a homogenous fluid below the surface, while salt is cone and quartered to homogenise and sample. Brine was diluted (1:10 in de-ionised water) at the lab to ensure accurate determination by ICP. Salt was crushed to <25mm and homogenising to ensure that the 200-300g subsample taken is representative for the grain size. 50g of the wet homogenised sample is air dried at ambient temperature and sent for XRD. Following this the sample is crushed with a mortar and pestle to <120um. It is then packed into a pellet to undergo XRD analysis. 10g of the wet homogenised sample is air dried at ambient temperature. Residual moisture is determined by acetone-displacement wash followed by drying at a temperature of 60 degrees Celsius. Following this drying, the salt sample is dissolved in 100ml of de-ionised water, and is sent for ICP analysis. |
Quality of assay data and laboratory tests |
· The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or total. · For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc., the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc. · Nature of quality control procedures adopted (e.g. standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (i.e. lack of bias) and precision have been established. |
The brine and salt samples were sent to Bureau Veritas (BV) Laboratories in Perth, WA. ICP and XRD preparation undertaken at BV. ICP analysis to determine the chemical ion analysis, and wet chemistry titration to determine chloride content was performed by Bureau Veritas, Canning Vale, WA. Sub samples prepared at BV were sent for XRD analysis to determine the salt crystal mineralogy at Microanalysis in Perth, WA. No laboratory analysis was undertaken with geophysical tools. All BV laboratories work to documented procedures compliant with ISO 9001 Quality Management Systems. Rigorous quality control and quality assurance measures are applied throughout the entire process in their laboratories. Standard quality assurance procedures include: • Analysis of blanks within each batch. • The routine testing of suitable certified reference materials from national and international suppliers, in addition to in-house and client supplied standards. Standards will be selected based on the elements of interest, expected range of concentration, and the analytical method used. • Duplicate samples are included in each batch to ensure that reproducible results are being achieved. Duplicate samples may be solutions, pulps or coarse splits as requested. • Re-assay of anomalous results by our quality control staff using techniques considered appropriate for the level of analytes encountered. • All sample results are reported. All blanks and standards are reported on request. Microanalysis uses XRD, which is semi-quantitative, as it does not take into account preferred orientation, strain or crystallite size. The amorphous content is estimated using the background ratio rather than an internal spike. All procedures are internally validated. Microanalysis Australia has an established QA/QC system of procedures for receipt, preparation and analysis of samples. All instruments are calibrated monthly with a certified reference standard. They run a calibration check using a certified Panalytical silicon standard monthly and monitor source decay. Repeatability studies have been undertaken to verify subsampling procedures. Every tenth sample is repeated to verify repeatability and consistency of results. |
Verification of sampling and assaying |
· The verification of significant intersections by either independent or alternative company personnel. · The use of twinned holes. · Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols. · Discuss any adjustment to assay data. |
Not applicable, brine is a homogenous fluid below the surface. Not applicable, brine is a homogenous fluid below the surface. All sampling and assaying is well documented and contained on SLP’s internal databases. No adjustments have been made to assay data. |
Location of data points |
· Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource estimation. · Specification of the grid system used. · Quality and adequacy of topographic control. |
Location data is not relevant for this process test and so was not taken.
|
Data spacing and distribution |
· Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results. · Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied. · Whether sample compositing has been applied. |
Brine samples were taken at appropriate time intervals, either weekly or biweekly, to gain sufficient resolution on the brines’ evaporation pathway. Salt samples were taken at pre-determined brine concentrations from prior modelling and so are indicative of the salts produced between the pre-determined harvest points. Sample compositing has not been applied. |
Orientation of data in relation to geological structure |
· Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of possible structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the deposit type. · If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material. |
Not applicable as harvest salts were homogenised. Drilling orientation is Not applicable. The entire mass of salt produced by the solar pond was harvested, homogenised and sent for assay.
|
Sample security |
· The measures taken to ensure sample security. |
SLP field geologists and engineers were responsible for sampling and homogenising all brine and salt samples prior to shipping to the BV lab in Perth and the SLP lab/warehouse. The security measures for the material and type of sampling at hand was appropriate. |
Audits or reviews |
· The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data. |
Data review is summarised in the report and included an assessment of the quality of assay data and laboratory tests and verification of sampling and assaying. No audits of sampling techniques and data have been undertaken. |
Section 2: Reporting of Exploration Results
Criteria |
JORC Code explanation |
Commentary |
Mineral tenement and land tenure status |
· Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmental settings. · The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area. |
On the 9th March 2018 Salt Lake Potash Ltd and Blackham Resources Ltd signed a gold and brine minerals memorandum of understanding. Under this MOU Blackham has granted the brine rights on its Lake Way tenement free from encumbrances to SLP. The tenements referred to in the MOU are; Exploration licences E53/1288, E53/1862, E53/1905, E53/1952, Mining Licences, M53/121, M53/122, M53/123, M53/147, M53/253, M53/796, M53/797, M53/798, M53/910, and Prospecting Licences P53/1642, P53/1646, P53/1666, P53/1667, P53/1668. All tenure is granted to Blackham Resources Ltd. |
Exploration done by other parties |
· Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties. |
No prior process (solar evaporation) test work has been undertaken on the brine from Williamson Pit or Lake Way Playa. The Company has previously reported a brine resource over the Blackham tenements – refer ASX Announcement 31 July 2018. There is a database of approximately 6200 boreholes across Lake Way of which some 1000 are within the Blackham tenements. The primary source for the information is the publicly available Western Australian Mineral Exploration (WAMEX) report data base. Recent sterilisation drilling has also been undertaken by Blackham Resources. The data from previous exploration work by other parties has not been used in appraising the results of the process testwork included in this announcement. |
Geology |
· Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation. |
The deposit is a salt-lake brine deposit. The lake setting is typical of a Western Australian palaeovalley environment. Ancient hydrological systems have incised palaeovalleys into Archaean basement rocks, which were then infilled by Tertiary-aged sediments typically comprising a coarse-grained fluvial basal sand overlaid by palaeovalley clay with some coarser grained interbeds. The clay is overlaid by recent Cainozoic material including lacustrine sediment, calcrete, evaporite and aeolian deposits. The brine is concentrated in solar evaporation ponds and the salt is precipitated into the evaporation ponds as fine (0.5 – 5mm) crystals that form a single, homogeneous salt bed. |
Drill hole Information |
· A summary of all information material to the understanding of the exploration results including a tabulation of the following information for all Material drill holes: · easting and northing of the drill hole collar · elevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevation above sea level in metres) of the drill hole collar · dip and azimuth of the hole · downhole length and interception depth · hole length. · If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that the information is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from the understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly explain why this is the case. |
No drilling was undertaken. Williamson pit brine was drawn from the bottom of the pit ramp. Lake brine is sourced from a pit next to the site evaporation trial with the following coordinates (26°46’25.55″S, 120°18’27.46″E)
|
Data aggregation methods |
· In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques, maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (e.g. cutting of high grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material and should be stated. · Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high grade results and longer lengths of low grade results, the procedure used for such aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of such aggregations should be shown in detail. · The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values should be clearly stated. |
Harvested salt from the solar evaporation ponds are homogenised, assayed weighed to provide the estimated grade. Average salt grade for each evaporation trial is determined by a weighted average, where the grade/mineralogy of each individual harvest is multiplied by the total wet mass of the harvest. The sum of these harvest grades is then divided by the total salt output from the pond. |
Relationship between mineralisation widths and intercept lengths |
· These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of Exploration Results. · If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is known, its nature should be reported. · If it is not known and only the downhole lengths are reported, there should be a clear statement to this effect (e.g. ‘down hole length, true width not known’). |
Not applicable to process testwork.
|
Diagrams |
· Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of intercepts should be included for any significant discovery being reported These should include, but not be limited to a plan view of drill hole collar locations and appropriate sectional views. |
Maps and sections not included for process testwork. Refer prior ASX Announcement dated 31 July 2018. |
Balanced reporting |
· Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not practicable, representative reporting of both low and high grades and/or widths should be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of Exploration Results. |
All results have been included in the body of the report.
|
Other substantive exploration data |
· Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be reported including (but not limited to): geological observations; geophysical survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples – size and method of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock characteristics; potential deleterious or contaminating substances. |
All material process data has been reported. |
Further work |
· The nature and scale of planned further work (e.g. tests for lateral extensions or depth extensions or large-scale step-out drilling). · Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions, including the main geological interpretations and future drilling areas, provided this information is not commercially sensitive. |
Field evaporation trials are ongoing. Downstream metallurgical test work on harvested salts will be undertaken by a world leading potash research laboratory to confirm the harvest salts may be converted to potash product.
|
Salt Lake Potash #SO4 – Results of General Meeting
Further to the Company’s announcements of 9 November 2018 and 20 November 2018, a General Meeting of the Company was held today, 20 December 2018, at 10.00am (WST) at which all resolutions were duly passed.
In accordance with Section 251AA of the Australian Corporations Act 2001, the following information is also provided:
Resolution |
Result |
Number of Proxy Votes |
|||
For |
Against |
Abstain |
Proxy’s Discretion |
||
1. Authorise Issue of Placement Shares to Mr Tony Swiericzuk |
Passed |
48,696,734 |
93,996 |
– |
800,000 |
2. Authorise Issue of Placement Shares to Mr Ian Middlemas |
Passed |
37,696,734 |
93,996 |
11,000,000 |
800,000 |
3. Ratification of Prior Placement Shares |
Passed |
38,360,682 |
93,996 |
10,336,052 |
800,000 |
4. Ratification of Prior Placement Shares |
Passed |
38,360,682 |
93,996 |
10,336,052 |
800,000 |
5. Ratification of Prior Placement of Options |
Passed |
37,696,734 |
93,996 |
11,000,000 |
800,000 |
For further information please visit www.saltlakepotash.com.au or contact:
Clint McGhie |
Salt Lake Potash Limited |
Tel: +61 8 9322 6322 |
Colin Aaronson/Richard Tonthat/Ben Roberts |
Grant Thornton UK LLP (Nominated Adviser) |
Tel: +44 (0) 20 7383 5100 |
Salt Lake Potash #SO4 – Government Support for Potash Industry Development
Government Support for Potash Industry Development
- Western Australian State Government has announced a commitment to assisting the development of the Potash Industry
- The Government will introduce a significantly reduced rental rate on a new class of Mining Lease specifically for Brine Minerals
Salt Lake Potash Limited (Salt Lake Potash or the Company) welcomes the Western Australian State Government’s (the Government) initiative in committing to assist in the development of the potash industry in Western Australia.
In its first act of support, the Government will introduce a new rental rate for potash projects which will reduce the existing rate of Mining Leases from $18.70 per hectare to $2.32 per hectare in the first five years and then $4.64 per hectare thereafter.
This Government initiative in support of the potash industry comes at an opportune time as Salt Lake Potash accelerates works at Lake Way including the imminent construction of the Williamson Ponds and the ‘whole of lake’ resource program to enable the consideration of larger scale production scenarios.
The Company believes that the Government’s commitment will further de-risk the development of the potash industry in Australia.
Salt Lake Potash’s Chief Executive Officer, Mr Tony Swiericzuk, said: “The commitment by the Government towards the development of the Potash industry will provide significant benefits as we progress the Lake Way Project. We look forward to working with the Government in the development of a new industry in Western Australia that will create vast opportunities to remote regions including Wiluna.”
Comment from Mines and Petroleum Minister Bill Johnston per the Government statement: “These changes will assist the development of a new industry in Western Australia, and create employment and community development opportunities, particularly in remote Aboriginal communities.
“Potash projects generally have a mine life that spans 30 to 40 years, so this longevity is a win for local communities and sustaining jobs.”
For further information please visit www.saltlakepotash.com.au or contact:
Tony Swiericzuk |
Salt Lake Potash Limited |
Tel: +61 8 9322 6322 |
Jo Battershill |
Salt Lake Potash Limited |
Tel: +44 (0) 754 036 6000 |
Colin Aaronson/Richard Tonthat/Ben Roberts |
Grant Thornton UK LLP (Nominated Adviser) |
Tel: +44 (0) 20 7383 5100 |
Derrick Lee/Beth McKiernan |
Cenkos Securities plc (Joint Broker) |
Tel: +44 (0) 131 220 6939 |
Jerry Keen/Toby Gibbs
|
Shore Capital (Joint broker) |
Tel: +44 (0) 20 7468 7967 |
Salt Lake Potash #SO4 announces a A$13.0m Placement to Institutional & Sophisticated Investors to Fund Project Development
Salt Lake Potash Limited (the Company or Salt Lake) is pleased to announce that it has received strong commitments from both existing and new institutional and sophisticated investors in Australia and overseas to subscribe for 31.0 million new ordinary shares of the Company (Ordinary Shares), to raise gross proceeds of $13,000,000 (Placement). There was very strong demand for the Placement, an endorsement of the recent appointment of Tony Swiericzuk as CEO and also of the Company’s world class Sulphate of Potash project.
Proceeds from the Placement will be used to fund construction of the Williamson Ponds and dewatering of the Williamson Pit, as well as ongoing development of on-lake infrastructure, exploration and feasibility studies, and general working capital.
The cornerstone investor for the Placement is a significant international investment fund. Directors and senior management intend to subscribe for a total of 2.4 million shares in the Placement, including 952,381 shares by the CEO, Mr Tony Swiericzuk, and 750,000 shares by the Company’s Chairman, Mr Ian Middlemas, which will be issued subject to shareholder approval.
Commenting on the Placement, SO4’s CEO, Tony Swiericzuk, said: “We are very pleased to have received such strong support from new and existing shareholders to fund the construction of the initial on-lake infrastructure at Lake Way. These activities are on the critical path to enabling SO4 to become the first Australian commercial producer of SOP in a global sector with outstanding potential. This strong support from investors endorses our view that the Goldfields Salt Lakes Project has enormous potential for value creation and we now look forward to rapidly delivering on this potential for all shareholders and stakeholders.”
Argonaut Securities Pty Limited and Canaccord Genuity (Australia) Limited acted as Joint Lead Manager to the Placement.
The issue price of A$0.42 represents a 13.4% discount to the last closing price of $0.485 on ASX.
The Placement will be completed in two tranches as follows:
(a) 29,250,000 shares will be issued on 16 November 2018 under Listing Rule 7.1 (11,745,041 shares) and Listing Rule 7.1A (17,504,959 shares). Following the issue of these shares the Company will have 7,612,398 remaining issue capacity under Listing Rule 7.1 and no remaining issue capacity under Listing Rule 7.1A.
(b) 1,702,381 shares intended to be subscribed for by Directors will be issued on or about Thursday 20 December 2018 subject to shareholder approval. A notice of general meeting will be sent to shareholders shortly.
Related Party transaction
The proposed participation in the Placement by Tony Swiericzuk, and Ian Middlemas constitutes a related party transaction under Rule 13 of the AIM Rules for Companies. The independent directors, having consulted the Company’s nominated adviser, Grant Thornton UK LLP, consider that the terms of the transaction are fair and reasonable insofar as the Company’s shareholders are concerned.
Settlement and dealings
Application will be made to the AIM Market of the London Stock Exchange (“AIM”) for 29,250,000 Ordinary Shares, pursuant to the Placement, which rank pari passu with the Company’s existing issued Ordinary Shares, to be admitted to trading. Dealings on AIM are expected to commence at 8:00am on or around 16 November 2018 (“Admission”).
Total Voting Rights
For the purposes of the Financial Conduct Authority’s Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules (“DTRs”), following Admission, Salt Lake will have 204,299,596 Ordinary Shares in issue with voting rights attached. Salt Lake holds no shares in treasury. This figure of 204,299,596 may be used by shareholders in the Company as the denominator for the calculations by which they will determine if they are required to notify their interest in, or a change to their interest in the Company, under the ASX Listing Rules or the DTRs.
Information required under ASX Listing Rule 3.10.5A:
(a) Dilution to existing shareholders as a result of the issue under Listing Rule 7.1A is 9.1%, dilution to existing shareholders as a result of the issue under Listing Rule 7.1 is 6.3% and the total dilution to existing shareholders is 14.3%. Details regarding the participation of existing and new shareholders is not able to be determined yet and will be provided at completion;
(b) The Company will issue 17,504,959 shares under Listing Rule 7.1A because the Placement was considered to be a more efficient mechanism for raising funds. The Placement did not expose the Company to additional costs, a protracted process and market volatility that may have been experienced with a pro-rata issue or other type of issue in which existing ordinary shareholders would have been eligible to participate;
(c) No underwriting arrangements are in place for the Placement under rule 7.1A; and
(d) A fee of up to 6% may be paid to the Brokers/Advisors in connection with the Placement under rule 7.1A.
The voluntary halt of trading of the Company’s shares on ASX was lifted prior to the opening of trade on 9 November 2018, following an announcement to the market regarding the above.
For further information please visit www.saltlakepotash.com.au or contact:
Tony Swiericzuk/Clint McGhie |
Salt Lake Potash Limited |
Tel: +61 8 9322 6322 |
Jo Battershill |
Salt Lake Potash Limited |
Tel: +44 (0) 20 7478 3900 |
Colin Aaronson/Richard Tonthat/Ben Roberts |
Grant Thornton UK LLP (Nominated Adviser) |
Tel: +44 (0) 20 7383 5100 |
Derrick Lee/Beth McKiernan |
Cenkos Securities plc (Joint Broker) |
Tel: +44 (0) 131 220 6939 |
Jerry Keen/Toby Gibbs
|
Shore Capital (Joint broker) |
Tel: +44 (0) 20 7468 7967
|
Forward Looking Statements
This announcement may include forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based on Salt Lake Potash Limited’s expectations and beliefs concerning future events. Forward looking statements are necessarily subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are outside the control of Salt Lake Potash Limited, which could cause actual results to differ materially from such statements. Salt Lake Potash Limited makes no undertaking to subsequently update or revise the forward-looking statements made in this announcement, to reflect the circumstances or events after the date of that announcement.
The information contained within this announcement is deemed to constitute inside information as stipulated under the Market Abuse Regulations (EU) No. 596/2014. Upon the publication of this announcement, this inside information is now considered to be in the public domain.
Salt Lake Potash #SO4 – Appointment of Managing Director and CEO
Further to its announcement of 22 October 2018, Salt Lake Potash Limited (“the Company”) is pleased to advise that Mr Tony Swiericzuk has commenced as Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer effective today.
Further information as required by Rule 17 and Schedule 2 paragraph (g) of the AIM Rules for Companies, is set out below:
Tony James Swiericzuk, aged 45, is or has been a director of the following companies in the last five years:
Current Directorships/Partnerships |
Past Directorships |
N/A |
FMG South America Pte Ltd |
FMG Colombia Operations Pte Ltd |
|
Colombia Fortescue SAS |
|
FMG Ecaudor Operations Pte Ltd |
|
FMG Ecuador Tenements Pte Ltd |
There is no further information required to be disclosed pursuant to Schedule Two, paragraph (g) of the AIM rules.
Mr Swiericzuk has no shareholding in the Company but holds an indirect interest in 5 million incentive options and 7,266,258 performance rights. A copy of the Appendix 3X – Initial Directors Interest Notice lodged on ASX today is copied below.
For further information please visit www.saltlakepotash.com.au or contact:
Clint McGhie |
Salt Lake Potash Limited |
Tel: +61 8 9322 6322 |
Colin Aaronson/Richard Tonthat |
Grant Thornton UK LLP (Nominated Adviser) |
Tel: +44 (0)207 383 5100 |
Appendix 3X
Initial Director’s Interest Notice
Information or documents not available now must be given to ASX as soon as available. Information and documents given to ASX become ASX’s property and may be made public.
Introduced 30/9/2001.
Name of entity Salt Lake Potash Limited |
ABN 98 117 085 748 |
We (the entity) give ASX the following information under listing rule 3.19A.1 and as agent for the director for the purposes of section 205G of the Corporations Act.
Name of Director |
Tony Swiericzuk |
Date of appointment |
5 November 2018 |
Part 1 – Director’s relevant interests in securities of which the director is the registered holder
In the case of a trust, this includes interests in the trust made available by the responsible entity of the trust
Note: In the case of a company, interests which come within paragraph (i) of the definition of “notifiable interest of a director” should be disclosed in this part.
Number & class of securitiesNil |
Part 2 – Director’s relevant interests in securities of which the director is not the registered holder
In the case of a trust, this includes interests in the trust made available by the responsible entity of the trust
Name of holder & nature of interestNote: Provide details of the circumstances giving rise to the relevant interest. Mr Tony James Swiericzuk & Ms Beverley Jean Eaton Swiericzuk <Bevton Family A/C> |
Number & class of Securities
1,000,000 incentive options (exercise price $0.60, vesting 4 November 2019, expiry date 1 November 2023) 2,000,000 incentive options (exercise price $1.00, vesting 4 November 2020, expiry date 1 November 2023) 2,000,000 incentive options (exercise price $1.20, vesting 4 November 2020, expiry date 1 November 2023) 7,266,258 unlisted performance rights (subject to various performance conditions to be satisfied prior to the relevant expiry dates between 31 July 2019 and 1 November 2023) |
Part 3 – Director’s interests in contracts
Note: In the case of a company, interests which come within paragraph (ii) of the definition of “notifiable interest of a director” should be disclosed in this part.
Detail of contract |
Not applicable |
Nature of interest
|
Not applicable |
Name of registered holder (if issued securities)
|
Not applicable |
No. and class of securities to which interest relates
|
Not applicable |