Home » Posts tagged 'sapan ghai'
Tag Archives: sapan ghai
Prairie Mining #PDZ – June 2018 Quarterly Report
Highlights from and subsequent to the quarter end:
Possible Prairie and JSW Co-Operation
- During the quarter, Prairie and JSW continued to exchange technical and commercial information in order to facilitate substantial and more advanced discussions regarding any potential co-operation or transaction(s) options in respect of Prairie’s Polish coking coal projects.
- Further meetings were held between the Company and JSW while Prairie has made available information to JSW in relation to both the Debiensko and Jan Karski mines to allow JSW to conduct assessments of their feasibility and economics.
- In a recent statement made by JSW, they disclosed that they expect to make a decision on any potential transaction with Prairie by the end of August 2018. There can be no certainty as to whether any transaction(s) will be agreed, or the potential form of such transaction(s). The Company will continue to comply with its continuous disclosure obligations and will make announcements to the market as required.
Jan Karski Mine
- Following legal proceedings filed against Poland’s Ministry of Environment due to its failure to grant Prairie a Mining Usufruct Agreement at the Jan Karski Mine:
- the Polish Civil Court ruled in Prairie’s favour by granting an injunction preventing the Ministry from granting any prospecting, exploration or mining concession and concluding usufruct agreements with any other party until full court proceedings are concluded; and
- the decision provides security of tenure over the Jan Karski concessions and effectively safeguards Prairie’s rights at the project until full court proceedings are concluded.
- The Lublin Regional Director for the Environment issued an official notification indicating that the process to establish an Environmental Consent decision for Jan Karski would be extended past 30 June 2018 due to further information requests to supplement Prairie’s original Environmental and Social Impact Assessment and ongoing local authority and public consultations.
Corporate
· Prairie remains in a financially strong position with cash reserves of A$11 million.
For further information, please contact:
Prairie Mining Limited |
+44 20 7478 3900 |
Ben Stoikovich, Chief Executive Officer |
|
Sapan Ghai, Head of Corporate Development |
DEBIENSKO MINE
The Debiensko Mine (“Debiensko”) is a permitted, hard coking coal project located in the Upper Silesian Coal Basin in the south west of the Republic of Poland. It is approximately 40 km from the city of Katowice and 40 km from the Czech Republic.
Debiensko is bordered by the Knurow-Szczyglowice Mine in the north west and the Budryk Mine in the north east, both owned and operated by Jastrzębska Spółka Węglowa SA (“JSW”), Europe’s leading producer of hard coking coal.
The Debiensko mine was originally opened in 1898 and was operated by various Polish mining companies until 2000 when mining operations were terminated due to a major government led restructuring of the coal sector caused by a downturn in global coal prices. In early 2006 New World Resources Plc (“NWR”) acquired Debiensko and commenced planning for Debiensko to comply with Polish mining standards, with the aim of accessing and mining hard coking coal seams. In 2008, the MoE granted a 50-year mine license for Debiensko.
In October 2016, Prairie Mining Limited’s (“Prairie” or “Company”) acquired Debiensko with a view that a revised development approach would potentially allow for the early mining of profitable premium hard coking coal seams, whilst minimising upfront capital costs. Prairie has proven expertise in defining commercially robust projects and applying international standards in Poland. The fact that Debiensko is a former operating mine and its proximity to two neighbouring coking coal producers in the same geological setting, reaffirms the significant potential to successfully bring Debiensko back into operation.
Preparation for the Next Phase of Project Studies
Prairie continues to analyse the drill hole data which will be used for engineering design of foundations of structures associated with the shafts, coal handling and preparation plant (“CHPP”) and other surface facilities. These holes are essential in order to assess the soil conditions, properly design structural foundations and thus provide more accurate pricing in the tenders as required for a feasibility study.
Prairie’s team have also designed an infill drilling program that when undertaken will upgrade more of the resource base at Debiensko to the Measured and Indicated resource categories and support JORC compliant reserve estimation.
JAN KARSKI MINE
The Jan Karski Mine (“Jan Karski”) is a large scale semi-soft coking coal project located in the Lublin Coal Basin in south east Poland. The Lublin Coal Basin is an established coal producing province which is well serviced by modern and highly efficient infrastructure, offering the potential for low capital intensity mine development. Jan Karski is situated adjacent to the Bogdanka coal mine which has been in commercial production since 1982 and is the lowest cost hard coal producer in Europe.
Prairie’s use of modern exploration techniques continues to transform Jan Karski with latest drill results re-affriming the capability of the the project to produce high value ultra-low ash semi-soft coking coal (“SSCC”), known as Type 34 coal in Poland whilst confirming Jan Karski as a globally significant SSCC / Type 34 coking coal deposit with the potential to produce a high value ultra-low ash SSCC with a coking coal product split of up to 75%.
Key benefits for the local community and the Lublin and Chelm regions associated with the development, construction and operation of Jan Karski have been recognised as the following:
- creation of 2,000 direct employment positions and 10,000 indirect jobs for the region once operational;
- increasing skills of the workforce and through the implementation of International Standard training programmes;
- stimulating the development of education, health services and communications within the region; and
- building a mine that creates new employment for generations to come and career paths for families to remain in the region.
Polish Civil Court Grants Injunction in Prairie’s Favour against Poland’s Ministry of Environment
On 3 April 2018, Prairie announced that it had commenced legal proceedings against Poland’s Ministry of Environment (“MoE”) due to its failure to grant Prairie a Mining Usufruct Agreement over the concessions which form the Jan Karski Mine and in order to protect the Company’s security of tenure over the project.
Pursuant to the initiated legal proceedings:
- the Polish Civil Court ruled in Prairie’s favour by granting an injunction preventing the MoE from granting prospecting, exploration or mining concessions and concluding usufruct agreements with any other party until full court proceedings are concluded;
- the decision provides security of tenure over the Jan Karski concessions and effectively safeguards Prairie’s rights at the project until full court proceedings have concluded.
The Regional Civil Court in Warsaw has issued a verdict that forms an injunction preventing the MoE from concluding exploration or mining usufruct agreement(s) regarding the Jan Karski Mine area (including the “Lublin” deposit, as well as the former K-4-5, K-6-7, K-8 and K-9 concession areas) with any party, other than PD Co Sp. z. o.o. (Prairie Mining’s wholly owned Polish subsidiary). The Court has also ordered that the MoE does not grant any concessions (for prospecting, exploration and/or mining) to any party other than PD Co Sp. z. o.o. This highly favourable court ruling was issued in response to Prairie’s application submitted as part of the legal proceedings commenced by Prairie to protect its tenure at Jan Karski.
As a result of the ruling by the Regional Civil Court in Warsaw, security of tenure over the Jan Karski concessions will be safeguarded until full court proceedings have concluded. It is anticipated that full court proceedings could take 12 months or more to complete.
In the justification to the Court’s ruling, the judge stated that: “Based on the evidence one may at this point state that the plaintiff [Prairie] enjoys the right to request conclusion of the requested mining usufruct agreement for the “Lublin” hard coal area (otherwise known as Jan Karski) resulting from Article 15 of the Geological and Mining Law.”
As discussed above, in April 2018, Prairie commenced legal action against the MoE for breaching the Polish Geological and Mining Law (2011) (“GML”) in relation to the award of a Mining Usufruct Agreement to Prairie at Jan Karski.
Prairie has provided the MoE with all documents required by Polish Law to conclude a Mining Usufruct Agreement, including the Geological Documentation approval and an official application for a Mining Usufruct Agreement.
To date the MoE has still not provided Prairie with a Mining Usufruct Agreement for Jan Karski.
Based on professional advice, Prairie considers that the MoE breached the GML and Polish law and is defending its position having commenced legal proceedings against the MoE through the Polish courts to protect its tenure at Jan Karski.
The Company will also consider any other actions necessary to ensure its concession rights are reserved which may result in the Company taking further action against the MoE including invoking the protection afforded to the Company under any relevant bi-lateral or multi-lateral investment treaties or such other actions as the Company may consider appropriate at the relevant time.
Prairie will continue to update the market in relation to this matter as required.
Regional Director for the Environment sets a new deadline for issuing an Environmental Consent Decision
Prairie completed an Environmental and Social Impact Assessment and made submissions to the Lublin Regional Director for the Environment (“RDOS”) for an Environmental Consent decision for Jan Karski in October 2017. During the quarter, the RDOS issued a notice indicating that the Environmental Proceedings would be delayed further, subject to the receipt of additional information requested by the RDOS which the Company, together with its appointed environmental consultants, are working to provide. During the quarter, there was a change of personnel fulfilling the functions of the Chairman and Deputy Chairman of the Lublin RDOS.
CORPORATE
Possible Co-Operation between Prairie and JSW
Prairie and JSW have entered into a Non-Disclosure Agreement (“NDA”) with respect to potential co-operation regarding Prairie’s two Polish coal projects. The purpose of the NDA is to allow for the exchange of technical and commercial information in order to facilitate substantial and more advanced discussions regarding any potential transaction(s) options in respect of Prairie’s projects.
Prairie will make available information in relation to the hard coking coal project under the Debiensko concession, to allow JSW to conduct an assessment of its feasibility and economics, taking into consideration factors including, but not limited to: its stage of development, conditions of the mining concession, environmental permits, and the mining usufruct contract. JSW will also assess other various risks and opportunities, including JSW’s existing infrastructure at the neighbouring Knurów-Szczygłowice mine.
Prairie will also make available to JSW information in relation to the Jan Karski project in the Lublin Coal Basin, to allow JSW to conduct an assessment of the project’s feasibility and economics regarding coking coal, taking into consideration factors including, but not limited to: its phase of development, the physical and chemical parameters of the coal (in particular its coking parameters), the timeframe and conditions with regards to obligations to obtain a mining concession, as well as other various risks and opportunities.
It is emphasised that any potential transaction(s), should they occur, may be subject to a number of conditions including, but not limited to, obtaining positive evaluations and expert opinions, necessary corporate approvals, consents and approvals related to funding, consents from Poland’s Office of Competition and Consumer Protection (UOKiK) if required, and any other requirements that may relate to the strategy, objectives and regulatory regimes applicable to either Prairie Mining or JSW.
In a recent statement made by JSW, they disclosed that they expect to make a decision on any potential transaction with Prairie by the end of August 2018. There can be no certainty as to whether any transaction(s) will be agreed, or the potential form of such transaction(s).
The NDA, signed at the end of March 2018, provides for discussions to be conducted for an initial period up to 6 months, which may be extended by mutual agreement of both parties. The companies will continue to comply with their respective disclosure obligations to the relevant markets, as required.
Financial Position and Balance Sheet
Prairie has cash reserves of A$11 million. With CD Capital’s right to invest a further A$68 million as a cornerstone investor, Prairie is in a strong financial position to progress with its planned activities at Debiensko and Jan Karski.
During the quarter, the convertible loan note held by CD Capital with a principal amount of A$15 million was converted into 44.8 million ordinary shares and the subsequent issue of 22.4 million A$0.60 unlisted options.
Forward Looking Statements
This release may include forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based on Prairie’s expectations and beliefs concerning future events. Forward looking statements are necessarily subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are outside the control of Prairie, which could cause actual results to differ materially from such statements. Prairie makes no undertaking to subsequently update or revise the forward-looking statements made in this release, to reflect the circumstances or events after the date of that release.
Competent Person Statements
The information in this announcement that relates to Exploration Results was extracted from Prairie’s announcement dated 21 February 2018 entitled “Drill Results Affirm Jan Karski’s Status as a Globally Significant Semi-Soft (Type 34) Coking Coal Project”. The information in the original announcement is based on, and fairly represents information compiled or reviewed by Mr Jonathan O’Dell, a Competent Person who is a Member of The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. Mr O’Dell is a part time consultant of the Company. Mr O’Dell has sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Prairie confirms that: a) it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in the original announcements; b) all material assumptions and technical parameters included in the original announcements continue to apply and have not materially changed; and c) the form and context in which the relevant Competent Persons’ findings are presented in this presentation have not been materially modified from the original announcements.
APPENDIX 1 – EXPLORATION TENEMENT INFORMATION
As at 30 June 2018, the Company has an interest in the following tenements:
Location |
Tenement |
Percentage Interest |
Status |
Tenement Type |
Jan Karski, Poland |
Jan Karski Mine Plan Area (K-4-5, K-6-7, K-8 and K-9)* |
100 |
Granted |
Exclusive Right to apply for a mining concession |
Jan Karski, Poland |
Kulik (K-4-5) |
100 |
Granted |
Exploration |
Jan Karski, Poland |
Syczyn (K-8) |
100 |
Granted |
Exploration |
Jan Karski, Poland |
Kopina (K-9) |
100 |
Granted |
Exploration |
Debiensko, Poland |
Debiensko 1** |
100 |
Granted |
Mining |
Debiensko, Poland |
Kaczyce 1 |
100 |
Granted |
Mining & Exploration (includes gas rights) |
* In July 2015, Prairie announced that it had secured the Exclusive Right to apply for a Mining Concession for Jan Karski as a result of its Geological Documentation for the Jan Karski deposit being approved by Poland’s MoE. The approved Geological Documentation covers areas of all four original Exploration Concessions granted to Prairie (K-4-5, K-6-7, K-8 and K-9) and includes the full extent of the targeted resources within the mine plan for Jan Karski. As a result of the Exclusive Right, Prairie was the only entity with a legal right to lodge a Mining Concession application over Jan Karski for the period up and until 2 April 2018. Under the Polish GML, a Mining Concession application comprises the submission of a Deposit Development Plan (“DDP”), approval of a spatial development plan (rezoning of land for mining use) and an Environmental Consent decision. Prairie has previously announced that the DDP and spatial development plans for Jan Karski have already been approved.
However, as of the date of this quarterly, Prairie has not yet received the required Environmental Consent decision, which remains pending. Prairie completed an Environmental and Social Impact Assessment and made submissions to RDOS for an Environmental Consent decision in October 2017. Prairie has not been able to apply for a Mining Concession for Jan Karski due to the delay in the issuance of an Environmental Consent decision. However, the Environmental Consent proceedings continue to progress and the Company has received notice from the RDOS to provide supplementary information to the originally submitted Environmental & Social Impact Assessment.
The approval of Prairie’s Geological Documentation in 2015 also conferred upon Prairie the legal right to apply for a Mining Usufruct Agreement over Jan Karski for an additional 12-month period beyond April 2018, which precludes any other parties being granted any licence over all or part of the Jan Karski concessions. Under Polish law, the MoE is strictly obligated, within three months of Prairie making an application for a Mining Usufruct Agreement, to grant the agreement. It should be noted that the MoE confirmed Prairie’s priority right in two written statements (i.e. in a final administrative decision dated 11 February 2016 and in a formal letter dated 13 April 2016). Prairie applied to the MoE for a Mining Usufruct Agreement over Jan Karski in late December 2017. As of the date of this quarterly the MoE has not made available to Prairie a Mining Usufruct Agreement for Jan Karski, therefore breaching the three-month obligatory period for the agreement to be concluded. Legal advice provided to Prairie concludes that failure of the MoE to grant Prairie the Mining Usufruct Agreement is a breach of Polish law. Accordingly, the Company commenced legal proceedings against the MoE through the Polish courts in order to protect the Company’s security of tenure over the Jan Karski concessions. Since the MoE has not provided a decision within three months regarding Prairie’s Mining Usufruct application, the Polish civil court has the power to enforce conclusion of a Usufruct Agreement in place of the MoE. In the event that a Mining Usufruct Agreement is not made available to the Company on acceptable terms or the Company does not enter into a Mining Usufruct Agreement for any other reason, other parties may be able to apply for exploration or mining rights for all or part of the Jan Karski concession area. However, given that the Civil Court has approved Prairie’s motion for an injunction against the MoE, as described above, the MoE is now prevented from entering into a Usufruct agreement or concession with any other party besides Prairie until the full court proceedings are concluded.
** Under the terms of the Debiensko Mining Concession issued in 2008 by the MoE (which is valid for 50 years from grant date), commencement of production was to occur by 1 January 2018. In December 2016, following the acquisition of Debiensko, Prairie applied to the MoE to amend the 50 year Debiensko Mining Concession. The purpose of the concession amendment was to extend the time stipulated in the Mining Concession for first production of coal from 2018 to 2025. Prairie has now received an initial and appealable, first instance decision from the MoE that has denied the Company’s amendment application. However, Prairie continues to have valid tenure and ownership of land at Debiensko. Not meeting the production timeframe stipulated in the concession does not immediately infringe on the validity and expiry date of the Debiensko Mining Concession, which is June 2058. Prairie also holds a valid environmental consent decision enabling mine construction. Prairie will appeal the MoE’s decision on the basis that its justification for denial is fundamentally flawed for a number of reasons including failure to take into account the requirements of the law and public interest in Poland, and the relevant facts of the Company and its amendment application. Prairie will strongly defend its position and continue to take relevant actions to pursue its legal rights regarding the Debiensko concession. Prairie’s legal team is in the process of preparing this appeal, which will point out the deficiencies of the MoE’s first instance decision. However, if Prairie’s appeal is unsuccessful, then this may lead to the commencement of proceedings by the MoE to limit or withdraw the Debiensko concession. Prairie also has the right of further appeal to Poland’s administrative courts. The Company will consider any other actions necessary to ensure its concession rights are preserved, which may result in the Company taking further action against the MoE including invoking the protection afforded to the Company under any relevant bi-lateral or multi-lateral investment treaties or such other actions as the Company may consider appropriate at the relevant time.
+Rule 5.5
Appendix 5B
Mining exploration entity and oil and gas exploration entity quarterly report
Introduced 01/07/96 Origin Appendix 8 Amended 01/07/97, 01/07/98, 30/09/01, 01/06/10, 17/12/10, 01/05/13, 01/09/16
Name of entity |
||
PRAIRIE MINING LIMITED |
||
ABN |
Quarter ended (“current quarter”) |
|
23 008 677 852 |
30 June 2018 |
Consolidated statement of cash flows |
Current quarter $A’000 |
Year to date (12 months) |
||
1. |
Cash flows from operating activities |
– |
– |
|
1.1 |
Receipts from customers |
|||
1.2 |
Payments for |
(805) |
(5,679) |
|
(a) exploration & evaluation |
||||
(b) development |
– |
– |
||
(c) production |
– |
– |
||
(d) staff costs |
(417) |
(1,990) |
||
(e) administration and corporate costs |
(360) |
(1,076) |
||
1.3 |
Dividends received (see note 3) |
– |
– |
|
1.4 |
Interest received |
73 |
370 |
|
1.5 |
Interest and other costs of finance paid |
– |
– |
|
1.6 |
Income taxes paid |
– |
– |
|
1.7 |
Research and development refunds |
– |
– |
|
1.8 |
Other (provide details if material) (a) Business development costs (b) Property rental and gas sales |
(104) 104 |
(777) 504 |
|
1.9 |
Net cash from / (used in) operating activities |
(1,509) |
(8,648) |
|
2. |
Cash flows from investing activities |
(3) |
(88) |
|
2.1 |
Payments to acquire: |
|||
(a) property, plant and equipment |
||||
(b) tenements (see item 10) |
– |
– |
||
(c) investments |
– |
– |
||
(d) other non-current assets |
– |
– |
||
2.2 |
Proceeds from the disposal of: |
– |
497 |
|
(a) property, plant and equipment |
||||
(b) tenements (see item 10) |
– |
– |
||
(c) investments |
– |
– |
||
(d) other non-current assets |
– |
– |
||
2.3 |
Cash flows from loans to other entities |
– |
– |
|
2.4 |
Dividends received (see note 3) |
– |
– |
|
2.5 |
Other (provide details if material) |
– |
– |
|
2.6 |
Net cash from / (used in) investing activities |
(3) |
409 |
|
3. |
Cash flows from financing activities |
– |
– |
|
3.1 |
Proceeds from issues of shares |
|||
3.2 |
Proceeds from issue of convertible notes |
– |
2,627 |
|
3.3 |
Proceeds from exercise of share options |
– |
– |
|
3.4 |
Transaction costs related to issues of shares, convertible notes or options |
– |
(182) |
|
3.5 |
Proceeds from borrowings |
– |
– |
|
3.6 |
Repayment of borrowings |
– |
– |
|
3.7 |
Transaction costs related to loans and borrowings |
– |
– |
|
3.8 |
Dividends paid |
– |
– |
|
3.9 |
Other (provide details if material) |
– |
– |
|
3.10 |
Net cash from / (used in) financing activities |
– |
2,445 |
|
4. |
Net increase / (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents for the period |
12,529 |
16,809 |
|
4.1 |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|||
4.2 |
Net cash from / (used in) operating activities (item 1.9 above) |
(1,509) |
(8,648) |
|
4.3 |
Net cash from / (used in) investing activities (item 2.6 above) |
(3) |
409 |
|
4.4 |
Net cash from / (used in) financing activities (item 3.10 above) |
– |
2,445 |
|
4.5 |
Effect of movement in exchange rates on cash held |
(1) |
1 |
|
4.6 |
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
11,016 |
11,016 |
|
5. |
Reconciliation of cash and cash equivalents |
Current quarter |
Previous quarter |
5.1 |
Bank balances |
3,016 |
2,029 |
5.2 |
Call deposits |
8,000 |
10,500 |
5.3 |
Bank overdrafts |
– |
– |
5.4 |
Other (provide details) |
– |
– |
5.5 |
Cash and cash equivalents at end of quarter (should equal item 4.6 above) |
11,016 |
12,529 |
6. |
Payments to directors of the entity and their associates |
Current quarter |
6.1 |
Aggregate amount of payments to these parties included in item 1.2 |
(188) |
6.2 |
Aggregate amount of cash flow from loans to these parties included in item 2.3 |
Nil |
6.3 |
Include below any explanation necessary to understand the transactions included in items 6.1 and 6.2 |
|
Payments include executive remuneration (including bonuses), director fees, superannuation and provision of a fully serviced office. |
7. |
Payments to related entities of the entity and their associates |
Current quarter |
7.1 |
Aggregate amount of payments to these parties included in item 1.2 |
– |
7.2 |
Aggregate amount of cash flow from loans to these parties included in item 2.3 |
– |
7.3 |
Include below any explanation necessary to understand the transactions included in items 7.1 and 7.2 |
|
Not applicable
|
8. |
Financing facilities available |
Total facility amount at quarter end |
Amount drawn at quarter end |
8.1 |
Loan facilities |
– |
– |
8.2 |
Credit standby arrangements |
– |
– |
8.3 |
Other (please specify) |
– |
– |
8.4 |
Include below a description of each facility above, including the lender, interest rate and whether it is secured or unsecured. If any additional facilities have been entered into or are proposed to be entered into after quarter end, include details of those facilities as well. |
||
9. |
Estimated cash outflows for next quarter |
$A’000 |
9.1 |
Exploration and evaluation |
(1,000) |
9.2 |
Development |
– |
9.3 |
Production |
– |
9.4 |
Staff costs |
(500) |
9.5 |
Administration and corporate costs |
(200) |
9.6 |
Other (provide details if material) |
(100) |
9.7 |
Total estimated cash outflows |
(1,800) |
10. |
Changes in tenements |
Tenement reference and location |
Nature of interest |
Interest at beginning of quarter |
Interest at end of quarter |
10.1 |
Interests in mining tenements and petroleum tenements lapsed, relinquished or reduced |
– |
– |
– |
– |
10.2 |
Interests in mining tenements and petroleum tenements acquired or increased |
– |
– |
– |
– |
Compliance statement
1 This statement has been prepared in accordance with accounting standards and policies which comply with Listing Rule 19.11A.
2 This statement gives a true and fair view of the matters disclosed.
[lodged electronically without signature]
Sign here: …………………………………………………… Date: 31 July 2018
(Director/Company secretary)
Print name: Dylan Browne
Notes
1. The quarterly report provides a basis for informing the market how the entity’s activities have been financed for the past quarter and the effect on its cash position. An entity that wishes to disclose additional information is encouraged to do so, in a note or notes included in or attached to this report.
2. If this quarterly report has been prepared in accordance with Australian Accounting Standards, the definitions in, and provisions of, AASB 6: Exploration for and Evaluation of Mineral Resources and AASB 107: Statement of Cash Flows apply to this report. If this quarterly report has been prepared in accordance with other accounting standards agreed by ASX pursuant to Listing Rule 19.11A, the corresponding equivalent standards apply to this report.
3. Dividends received may be classified either as cash flows from operating activities or cash flows from investing activities, depending on the accounting policy of the entity.
Prairie Mining #PDZ – Update regarding discussions on possible co-operation with JSW
Further to Prairie Mining #PDZ announcement on 29 March 2018 on the possible co-operation between Prairie and Jastrzębska Spółka Węglowa SA (“JSW”), Prairie notes recent press articles regarding comments by representatives from JSW on possible transaction(s) between the Company and JSW with respect to Prairie’s Polish coal projects.
The Company advises that discussions continue to take place as part of the exchange of technical and commercial information as referenced in the Company’s announcement on 29 March 2018. Commercial discussions continue to be at a preliminary stage and that even if they move onto discussions of specific transactions terms there can be no certainty as to whether any transaction(s) will be agreed, or the potential form of such transaction(s). The Company expects further exchange of information will continue with JSW.
Any potential transaction(s), should they occur, may be subject to a number of conditions including, but not limited to, obtaining positive evaluations and expert opinions, necessary corporate approvals, consents and approvals related to funding, consents from Poland’s Office of Competition and Consumer Protection (UOKiK) if required, and any other requirements that may relate to the strategy, objectives and regulatory regimes applicable to the respective issuers.
The Company will continue to comply with its continuous disclosure obligations and will make announcements to the market as required.
For further information, please contact:
Prairie Mining Limited |
Tel: +44 207 478 3900 |
Ben Stoikovich, Chief Executive Officer |
Email: info@pdz.com.au |
Sapan Ghai, Head of Corporate Development |
Prairie Mining #PDZ – Issue of shares on conversion of convertible note
Prairie Mining Limited #PDZ announces that 44,776,120 fully paid ordinary shares have been issued today upon conversion of the convertible loan note with a principal amount of $15,000,000, exchangeable into 44,776,120 ordinary shares at a conversion price of $0.335 per share (Loan Note 1) and the subsequent issue of 22,388,060 unlisted options exercisable at $0.60 each on or before 30 May 2021 on conversion of Loan Note 1.
An application will be made to the London Stock Exchange for the new ordinary shares, which rank pari passu with the Company’s existing issued ordinary shares, in due course and in any event within 12 months.
Following admission, the Company’s issued ordinary share capital will be 212,275,089 ordinary shares.
The above figure of 212,275,089 ordinary shares may be used by shareholders as the denominator for the calculations by which they will determine if they are required to notify their interest in, or a change to their interest in, the share capital of the Company, under the FCA’s Disclosure and Transparency Rules.
For further information, contact:
Prairie Mining Limited |
Tel: +44 207 478 3900 |
Ben Stoikovich, Chief Executive Officer |
Email: info@pdz.com.au |
Sapan Ghai, Head of Corporate Development |
Rule 2.7, 3.10.3, 3.10.4, 3.10.5
Appendix 3B
New issue announcement, application for quotation of additional securities and agreement
Information or documents not available now must be given to ASX as soon as available. Information and documents given to ASX become ASX’s property and may be made public.
Introduced 01/07/96 Origin: Appendix 5 Amended 01/07/98, 01/09/99, 01/07/00, 30/09/01, 11/03/02, 01/01/03, 24/10/05, 01/08/12, 04/03/13
Name of entity |
PRAIRIE MINING LIMITED |
ABN |
23 008 677 852 |
We (the entity) give ASX the following information.
Part 1 ‑ All issues
You must complete the relevant sections (attach sheets if there is not enough space).
1 |
+Class of +securities issued or to be issued |
a) Ordinary shares b) Unlisted options |
|||
2 |
Number of +securities issued or to be issued (if known) or maximum number which may be issued |
a) 44,776,120 b) 22,388,060
|
|||
3 |
Principal terms of the +securities (e.g. if options, exercise price and expiry date; if partly paid +securities, the amount outstanding and due dates for payment; if +convertible securities, the conversion price and dates for conversion) |
a) Ordinary fully paid shares b) Unlisted options exercisable at $0.60 each on or before 30 May 2021 |
|||
4 |
Do the +securities rank equally in all respects from the +issue date with an existing +class of quoted +securities?
If the additional +securities do not rank equally, please state: · the date from which they do · the extent to which they participate for the next dividend, (in the case of a trust, distribution) or interest payment · the extent to which they do not rank equally, other than in relation to the next dividend, distribution or interest payment |
a) Yes b) No – not listed
|
|||
5 |
Issue price or consideration
|
See below
|
|||
6 |
Purpose of the issue (If issued as consideration for the acquisition of assets, clearly identify those assets)
|
Conversion of the convertible loan note with a principal amount of $15,000,000, exchangeable into 44,776,120 ordinary shares at a conversion price of $0.335 per share (“Loan Note 1”) and the subsequent issue of unlisted options on conversion of Loan Note 1
|
|||
6a |
Is the entity an +eligible entity that has obtained security holder approval under rule 7.1A?
If Yes, complete sections 6b – 6h in relation to the +securities the subject of this Appendix 3B, and comply with section 6i |
No |
|||
6b |
The date the security holder resolution under rule 7.1A was passed |
Not applicable
|
|||
6c |
Number of +securities issued without security holder approval under rule 7.1 |
Nil
|
|||
6d |
Number of +securities issued with security holder approval under rule 7.1A |
Not applicable
|
|||
6e |
Number of +securities issued with security holder approval under rule 7.3, or another specific security holder approval (specify date of meeting)
|
67,164,180 – 21 September 2015
|
|||
6f |
Number of +securities issued under an exception in rule 7.2 |
Not applicable
|
|||
6g |
If +securities issued under rule 7.1A, was issue price at least 75% of 15 day VWAP as calculated under rule 7.1A.3? Include the +issue date and both values. Include the source of the VWAP calculation. |
Not applicable |
|||
6h |
If +securities were issued under rule 7.1A for non-cash consideration, state date on which valuation of consideration was released to ASX Market Announcements |
Not applicable |
|||
6i |
Calculate the entity’s remaining issue capacity under rule 7.1 and rule 7.1A – complete Annexure 1 and release to ASX Market Announcements |
Rule 7.1 – 31,341,263 Rule 7.1A – Not applicable
|
|||
7 |
+Issue dates Note: The issue date may be prescribed by ASX (refer to the definition of issue date in rule 19.12). For example, the issue date for a pro rata entitlement issue must comply with the applicable timetable in Appendix 7A. Cross reference: item 33 of Appendix 3B. |
30 May 2018 |
|||
Number |
+Class |
||||
8 |
Number and +class of all +securities quoted on ASX (including the +securities in section 2 if applicable)
|
212,275,089 |
Ordinary Shares
|
||
Number |
+Class |
||||
9 |
Number and +class of all +securities not quoted on ASX (including the +securities in section 2 if applicable)
|
1,400,000
200,000
900,000
700,000
22,388,060
10,925,000
5,711,805 |
Options exercisable at $0.45 each on or before 30 June 2018
Options exercisable at $0.50 each on or before 31 March 2020
Options exercisable at $0.60 each on or before 31 March 2020
Options exercisable at $0.80 each on or before 31 March 2020
Options exercisable at $0.60 each on or before 30 May 2021
Performance share rights subject to various performance conditions to be satisfied prior to relevant milestones or expiry dates between 31 December 2018 and 31 December 2020
Convertible loan note with a principal amount of $2,627,430, convertible into 5,711,805 ordinary shares at a conversion price of $0.46 per share with no expiry date (“Loan Note 2”) |
||
10 |
Dividend policy (in the case of a trust, distribution policy) on the increased capital (interests) |
Not applicable |
|||
Part 2 ‑ Pro rata issue
11 |
Is security holder approval required?
|
Not applicable |
12 |
Is the issue renounceable or non-renounceable? |
Not applicable |
13 |
Ratio in which the +securities will be offered |
Not applicable |
14 |
+Class of +securities to which the offer relates |
Not applicable |
15 |
+Record date to determine entitlements |
Not applicable |
16 |
Will holdings on different registers (or subregisters) be aggregated for calculating entitlements? |
Not applicable |
17 |
Policy for deciding entitlements in relation to fractions
|
Not applicable |
18 |
Names of countries in which the entity has security holders who will not be sent new offer documents Note: Security holders must be told how their entitlements are to be dealt with. Cross reference: rule 7.7. |
Not applicable |
19 |
Closing date for receipt of acceptances or renunciations |
Not applicable |
|
||
20 |
Names of any underwriters
|
Not applicable |
21 |
Amount of any underwriting fee or commission |
Not applicable |
22 |
Names of any brokers to the issue
|
Not applicable |
23 |
Fee or commission payable to the broker to the issue |
Not applicable |
24 |
Amount of any handling fee payable to brokers who lodge acceptances or renunciations on behalf of security holders |
Not applicable |
25 |
If the issue is contingent on security holders’ approval, the date of the meeting |
Not applicable |
26 |
Date entitlement and acceptance form and offer documents will be sent to persons entitled |
Not applicable |
27 |
If the entity has issued options, and the terms entitle option holders to participate on exercise, the date on which notices will be sent to option holders |
Not applicable |
|
||
28 |
Date rights trading will begin (if applicable) |
Not applicable |
29 |
Date rights trading will end (if applicable)
|
Not applicable |
30 |
How do security holders sell their entitlements in fullthrough a broker? |
Not applicable |
31 |
How do security holders sell part of their entitlements through a broker and accept for the balance? |
Not applicable |
32 |
How do security holders dispose of their entitlements (except by sale through a broker)? |
Not applicable |
33 |
+Issue date
|
Not applicable |
Part 3 ‑ Quotation of securities
You need only complete this section if you are applying for quotation of securities
34 |
Type of +securities (tick one)
|
|
(a) |
+Securities described in Part 1 |
|
(b) |
All other +securities Example: restricted securities at the end of the escrowed period, partly paid securities that become fully paid, employee incentive share securities when restriction ends, securities issued on expiry or conversion of convertible securities |
Entities that have ticked box 34(a)
Additional securities forming a new class of securities
Tick to indicate you are providing the information or documents |
35 |
If the +securities are +equity securities, the names of the 20 largest holders of the additional +securities, and the number and percentage of additional +securities held by those holders |
|
36 |
If the +securities are +equity securities, a distribution schedule of the additional +securities setting out the number of holders in the categories 1 – 1,000 1,001 – 5,000 5,001 – 10,000 10,001 – 100,000 100,001 and over |
|
37 |
A copy of any trust deed for the additional +securities |
Entities that have ticked box 34(b)
38 |
Number of +securities for which +quotation is sought
|
Not applicable |
||
39 |
+Class of +securities for which quotation is sought
|
Not applicable |
||
40 |
Do the +securities rank equally in all respects from the +issue date with an existing +class of quoted +securities?
If the additional +securities do not rank equally, please state: · the date from which they do · the extent to which they participate for the next dividend, (in the case of a trust, distribution) or interest payment · the extent to which they do not rank equally, other than in relation to the next dividend, distribution or interest payment |
Not applicable |
||
41 |
Reason for request for quotation now Example: In the case of restricted securities, end of restriction period
(if issued upon conversion of another +security, clearly identify that other +security)
|
Not applicable |
||
Number |
+Class |
|||
42 |
Number and +class of all +securities quoted on ASX (including the +securities in clause 38)
|
Not applicable
|
Not applicable |
|
Quotation agreement
1 +Quotation of our additional +securities is in ASX’s absolute discretion. ASX may quote the +securities on any conditions it decides.
2 We warrant the following to ASX.
· The issue of the +securities to be quoted complies with the law and is not for an illegal purpose.
· There is no reason why those +securities should not be granted +quotation.
· An offer of the +securities for sale within 12 months after their issue will not require disclosure under section 707(3) or section 1012C(6) of the Corporations Act.
Note: An entity may need to obtain appropriate warranties from subscribers for the securities in order to be able to give this warranty
· Section 724 or section 1016E of the Corporations Act does not apply to any applications received by us in relation to any +securities to be quoted and that no-one has any right to return any +securities to be quoted under sections 737, 738 or 1016F of the Corporations Act at the time that we request that the +securities be quoted.
· If we are a trust, we warrant that no person has the right to return the +securities to be quoted under section 1019B of the Corporations Act at the time that we request that the +securities be quoted.
3 We will indemnify ASX to the fullest extent permitted by law in respect of any claim, action or expense arising from or connected with any breach of the warranties in this agreement.
4 We give ASX the information and documents required by this form. If any information or document is not available now, we will give it to ASX before +quotation of the +securities begins. We acknowledge that ASX is relying on the information and documents. We warrant that they are (will be) true and complete.
[signed electronically without signature]
Sign here: …………………………………………………… Date: 30 May 2018
(Director/Company secretary)
Print name: Dylan Browne
== == == == ==
Appendix 3B – Annexure 1
Calculation of placement capacity under rule 7.1 and rule 7.1A for eligible entities
Introduced 01/08/12 Amended 04/03/13
Part 1
Rule 7.1 – Issues exceeding 15% of capital |
||
Step 1: Calculate “A”, the base figure from which the placement capacity is calculated |
||
Insert number of fully paid +ordinary securities on issue 12 months before the +issue date or date of agreement to issue |
163,478,969 |
|
Add the following: • Number of fully paid +ordinary securities issued in that 12 month period under an exception in rule 7.2 • Number of fully paid +ordinary securities issued in that 12 month period with shareholder approval • Number of partly paid +ordinary securities that became fully paid in that 12 month period Note: • Include only ordinary securities here – other classes of equity securities cannot be added • Include here (if applicable) the securities the subject of the Appendix 3B to which this form is annexed • It may be useful to set out issues of securities on different dates as separate line items |
570,000 ordinary shares (9 June 2017) 2,110,000 ordinary shares (16 June 2017) 1,340,000 ordinary shares (6 July 2017) 44,776,120 ordinary shares (30 May 2018) |
|
Subtract the number of fully paid +ordinary securities cancelled during that 12 month period |
Nil |
|
“A” |
212,275,089 |
|
Step 2: Calculate 15% of “A” |
||
“B” |
0.15 [Note: this value cannot be changed] |
|
Multiply “A” by 0.15 |
31,841,263 |
|
Step 3: Calculate “C”, the amount of placement capacity under rule 7.1 that has already been used |
||
Insert number of +equity securities issued or agreed to be issued in that 12 month period not counting those issued: • Under an exception in rule 7.2 • Under rule 7.1A • With security holder approval under rule 7.1 or rule 7.4 Note: • This applies to equity securities, unless specifically excluded – not just ordinary securities • Include here (if applicable) the securities the subject of the Appendix 3B to which this form is annexed • It may be useful to set out issues of securities on different dates as separate line items |
500,000 Incentive options (15 Sep 2017)
|
|
“C” |
500,000 |
|
Step 4: Subtract “C” from [“A” x “B”] to calculate remaining placement capacity under rule 7.1 |
||
“A” x 0.15 Note: number must be same as shown in Step 2 |
31,841,263 |
|
Subtract “C” Note: number must be same as shown in Step 3 |
500,000 |
|
Total [“A” x 0.15] – “C” |
31,341,263 [Note: this is the remaining placement capacity under rule 7.1] |
|
Part 2
Rule 7.1A – Additional placement capacity for eligible entities |
|
Step 1: Calculate “A”, the base figure from which the placement capacity is calculated |
|
“A” Note: number must be same as shown in Step 1 of Part 1 |
Not applicable |
Step 2: Calculate 10% of “A” |
|
“D” |
0.10 Note: this value cannot be changed |
Multiply “A” by 0.10 |
Not applicable |
Step 3: Calculate “E”, the amount of placement capacity under rule 7.1A that has already been used |
|
Insert number of +equity securities issued or agreed to be issued in that 12 month period under rule 7.1A Notes: • This applies to equity securities – not just ordinary securities • Include here – if applicable – the securities the subject of the Appendix 3B to which this form is annexed • Do not include equity securities issued under rule 7.1 (they must be dealt with in Part 1), or for which specific security holder approval has been obtained • It may be useful to set out issues of securities on different dates as separate line items |
Not applicable |
“E” |
Not applicable |
Step 4: Subtract “E” from [“A” x “D”] to calculate remaining placement capacity under rule 7.1A |
|
“A” x 0.10 Note: number must be same as shown in Step 2 |
Not applicable |
Subtract “E” Note: number must be same as shown in Step 3 |
Not applicable |
Total [“A” x 0.10] – “E” |
Not applicable Note: this is the remaining placement capacity under rule 7.1A |
Notice under Section 708A
30 May 2018
Prairie Mining Limited (“Company”) has today issued 44,776,120 fully paid ordinary shares. The issued securities are in a class of securities quoted on the Australian Securities Exchange (“ASX”).
The Company gives this notice pursuant to Section 708A(5)(e) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cwth)(the “Act”) that:
1. the Company issued the securities without disclosure to investors under Part 6D.2 of the Act;
2. as at the date of this notice, the Company has complied with the provisions of Chapter 2M of the Act as they apply to the Company, and section 674 of the Act; and
3. as at the date of this notice, there is no information that is “excluded information” within the meaning of sections 708A(7) and 708A(8) of the Act.
Prairie Mining #PDZ – Appendix 3B – Issue of Performance Rights
Prairie Mining Limited (Company) announces that 1,500,000 unlisted Performance Rights have been issued today to key employees and consultants of the Company pursuant to the Company’s long-term incentive Performance Rights Plan.
No new Ordinary Shares are being issued.
The below figure of 167,498,969 Ordinary Shares can be continued to be used by shareholders as the denominator for the calculations by which they will determine if they are required to notify their interest in, or a change to their interest in, the share capital of the Company, under the FCA’s Disclosure and Transparency Rules.
For further information, please contact:
Prairie Mining Limited |
|
Ben Stoikovich, Chief Executive Officer |
Tel: +44 207 478 3900 |
Sapan Ghai, Head of Corporate Development |
Email: info@pdz.com.au |
Rule 2.7, 3.10.3, 3.10.4, 3.10.5
Appendix 3B
New issue announcement, application for quotation of additional securities and agreement
Information or documents not available now must be given to ASX as soon as available. Information and documents given to ASX become ASX’s property and may be made public.
Introduced 01/07/96 Origin: Appendix 5 Amended 01/07/98, 01/09/99, 01/07/00, 30/09/01, 11/03/02, 01/01/03, 24/10/05, 01/08/12, 04/03/13
Name of entity |
PRAIRIE MINING LIMITED |
ABN |
23 008 677 852 |
We (the entity) give ASX the following information.
Part 1 ‑ All issues
You must complete the relevant sections (attach sheets if there is not enough space).
1 |
+Class of +securities issued or to be issued |
Performance share rights |
|||
2 |
Number of +securities issued or to be issued (if known) or maximum number which may be issued |
1,500,000
|
|||
3 |
Principal terms of the +securities (e.g. if options, exercise price and expiry date; if partly paid +securities, the amount outstanding and due dates for payment; if +convertible securities, the conversion price and dates for conversion) |
Performance share rights which do not have an exercise price but are subject to various performance conditions (including: Jan Karski Construction; Debiensko Feasibility Study; and Debiensko Construction Milestones) to be satisfied prior to the relevant expiry dates between 31 December 2018 and 31 December 2020 |
|||
4 |
Do the +securities rank equally in all respects from the +issue date with an existing +class of quoted +securities? If the additional +securities do not rank equally, please state: · the date from which they do · the extent to which they participate for the next dividend, (in the case of a trust, distribution) or interest payment · the extent to which they do not rank equally, other than in relation to the next dividend, distribution or interest payment |
No – not listed
|
|||
5 |
Issue price or consideration
|
Nil – see below
|
|||
6 |
Purpose of the issue (If issued as consideration for the acquisition of assets, clearly identify those assets)
|
Issue of performance share rights to key employees and consultants of the Company
|
|||
6a |
Is the entity an +eligible entity that has obtained security holder approval under rule 7.1A? If Yes, complete sections 6b – 6h in relation to the+securities the subject of this Appendix 3B, and comply with section 6i |
No |
|||
6b |
The date the security holder resolution under rule 7.1A was passed |
Not applicable
|
|||
6c |
Number of +securities issued without security holder approval under rule 7.1 |
Not applicable
|
|||
6d |
Number of +securities issued with security holder approval under rule 7.1A |
Not applicable
|
|||
6e |
Number of +securities issued with security holder approval under rule 7.3, or another specific security holder approval (specify date of meeting)
|
Not applicable
|
|||
6f |
Number of +securities issued under an exception in rule 7.2 |
Not applicable
|
|||
6g |
If +securities issued under rule 7.1A, was issue price at least 75% of 15 day VWAP as calculated under rule 7.1A.3? Include the +issue date and both values. Include the source of the VWAP calculation. |
Not applicable |
|||
6h |
If +securities were issued under rule 7.1A for non-cash consideration, state date on which valuation of consideration was released to ASX Market Announcements |
Not applicable |
|||
6i |
Calculate the entity’s remaining issue capacity under rule 7.1 and rule 7.1A – complete Annexure 1 and release to ASX Market Announcements |
Rule 7.1 – 24,486,845 Rule 7.1A – Not applicable
|
|||
7 |
+Issue dates Note: The issue date may be prescribed by ASX (refer to the definition of issue date in rule 19.12). For example, the issue date for a pro rata entitlement issue must comply with the applicable timetable in Appendix 7A. Cross reference: item 33 of Appendix 3B. |
7 February 2018 |
|||
Number |
+Class |
||||
8 |
Number and +class of all +securities quoted on ASX (including the +securities in section 2 if applicable)
|
167,498,969 |
Ordinary Shares
|
||
Number |
+Class |
||||
9 |
Number and +class of all +securities not quoted on ASX (including the +securities in section 2 if applicable)
|
1,400,000
200,000
900,000
700,000
10,925,000
44,776,120
22,388,060
5,711,805 |
Options exercisable at $0.45 each on or before 30 June 2018
Options exercisable at $0.50 each on or before 31 March 2020
Options exercisable at $0.60 each on or before 31 March 2020
Options exercisable at $0.80 each on or before 31 March 2020
Performance share rights subject to various performance conditions to be satisfied prior to relevant milestones or expiry dates between 31 December 2018 and 31 December 2020
Convertible loan note with a principal amount of $15,000,000, exchangeable into 44,776,120 ordinary shares at a conversion price of $0.335 per share with no expiry date (“Loan Note 1”).
Agreement to issue unlisted options exercisable at $0.60 each expiring 3 years after conversion of Loan Note 1.
Convertible loan note with a principal amount of $2,627,430, convertible into 5,711,805 ordinary shares at a conversion price of $0.46 per share with no expiry date (“Loan Note 2”) |
||
10 |
Dividend policy (in the case of a trust, distribution policy) on the increased capital (interests) |
Not applicable |
|||
Part 2 ‑ Pro rata issue
11 |
Is security holder approval required?
|
Not applicable |
12 |
Is the issue renounceable or non-renounceable? |
Not applicable |
13 |
Ratio in which the +securities will be offered |
Not applicable |
14 |
+Class of +securities to which the offer relates |
Not applicable |
15 |
+Record date to determine entitlements |
Not applicable |
16 |
Will holdings on different registers (or subregisters) be aggregated for calculating entitlements? |
Not applicable |
17 |
Policy for deciding entitlements in relation to fractions
|
Not applicable |
18 |
Names of countries in which the entity has security holders who will not be sent new offer documents Note: Security holders must be told how their entitlements are to be dealt with. Cross reference: rule 7.7. |
Not applicable |
19 |
Closing date for receipt of acceptances or renunciations |
Not applicable |
|
||
20 |
Names of any underwriters
|
Not applicable |
21 |
Amount of any underwriting fee or commission |
Not applicable |
22 |
Names of any brokers to the issue
|
Not applicable |
23 |
Fee or commission payable to the broker to the issue |
Not applicable |
24 |
Amount of any handling fee payable to brokers who lodge acceptances or renunciations on behalf of security holders |
Not applicable |
25 |
If the issue is contingent on security holders’ approval, the date of the meeting |
Not applicable |
26 |
Date entitlement and acceptance form and offer documents will be sent to persons entitled |
Not applicable |
27 |
If the entity has issued options, and the terms entitle option holders to participate on exercise, the date on which notices will be sent to option holders |
Not applicable |
28 |
Date rights trading will begin (if applicable) |
Not applicable |
29 |
Date rights trading will end (if applicable)
|
Not applicable |
30 |
How do security holders sell their entitlements in fullthrough a broker? |
Not applicable |
31 |
How do security holders sell part of their entitlements through a broker and accept for the balance? |
Not applicable |
32 |
How do security holders dispose of their entitlements (except by sale through a broker)? |
Not applicable |
33 |
+Issue date
|
Not applicable |
Part 3 ‑ Quotation of securities
You need only complete this section if you are applying for quotation of securities
34 |
Type of +securities (tick one)
|
|
(a) |
+Securities described in Part 1 |
|
(b) |
All other +securities Example: restricted securities at the end of the escrowed period, partly paid securities that become fully paid, employee incentive share securities when restriction ends, securities issued on expiry or conversion of convertible securities |
Entities that have ticked box 34(a)
Additional securities forming a new class of securities
Tick to indicate you are providing the information or documents |
35 |
If the +securities are +equity securities, the names of the 20 largest holders of the additional +securities, and the number and percentage of additional +securities held by those holders |
|
36 |
If the +securities are +equity securities, a distribution schedule of the additional +securities setting out the number of holders in the categories 1 – 1,000 1,001 – 5,000 5,001 – 10,000 10,001 – 100,000 100,001 and over |
|
37 |
A copy of any trust deed for the additional +securities |
Entities that have ticked box 34(b)
38 |
Number of +securities for which +quotation is sought
|
Not applicable |
||
39 |
+Class of +securities for which quotation is sought
|
Not applicable |
||
40 |
Do the +securities rank equally in all respects from the +issue date with an existing +class of quoted +securities? If the additional +securities do not rank equally, please state: · the date from which they do · the extent to which they participate for the next dividend, (in the case of a trust, distribution) or interest payment · the extent to which they do not rank equally, other than in relation to the next dividend, distribution or interest payment |
Not applicable |
||
41 |
Reason for request for quotation now Example: In the case of restricted securities, end of restriction period (if issued upon conversion of another +security, clearly identify that other +security) |
Not applicable |
||
Number |
+Class |
|||
42 |
Number and +class of all +securities quoted on ASX (including the +securities in clause 38)
|
Not applicable
|
Not applicable |
|
Quotation agreement
1 +Quotation of our additional +securities is in ASX’s absolute discretion. ASX may quote the +securities on any conditions it decides.
2 We warrant the following to ASX.
· The issue of the +securities to be quoted complies with the law and is not for an illegal purpose.
· There is no reason why those +securities should not be granted +quotation.
· An offer of the +securities for sale within 12 months after their issue will not require disclosure under section 707(3) or section 1012C(6) of the Corporations Act.
Note: An entity may need to obtain appropriate warranties from subscribers for the securities in order to be able to give this warranty
· Section 724 or section 1016E of the Corporations Act does not apply to any applications received by us in relation to any +securities to be quoted and that no-one has any right to return any +securities to be quoted under sections 737, 738 or 1016F of the Corporations Act at the time that we request that the +securities be quoted.
· If we are a trust, we warrant that no person has the right to return the +securities to be quoted under section 1019B of the Corporations Act at the time that we request that the +securities be quoted.
3 We will indemnify ASX to the fullest extent permitted by law in respect of any claim, action or expense arising from or connected with any breach of the warranties in this agreement.
4 We give ASX the information and documents required by this form. If any information or document is not available now, we will give it to ASX before +quotation of the +securities begins. We acknowledge that ASX is relying on the information and documents. We warrant that they are (will be) true and complete.
[signed electronically without signature]
Sign here: …………………………………………………… Date: 7 February 2018
(Director/Company secretary)
Print name: Dylan Browne
== == == == ==
Appendix 3B – Annexure 1
Calculation of placement capacity under rule 7.1 and rule 7.1A for eligible entities
Introduced 01/08/12 Amended 04/03/13
Part 1
Rule 7.1 – Issues exceeding 15% of capital |
|
Step 1: Calculate “A”, the base figure from which the placement capacity is calculated |
|
Insert number of fully paid +ordinary securities on issue 12 months before the +issue date or date of agreement to issue |
151,858,969 |
Add the following: • Number of fully paid +ordinary securities issued in that 12 month period under an exception in rule 7.2 • Number of fully paid +ordinary securities issued in that 12 month period with shareholder approval • Number of partly paid +ordinary securities that became fully paid in that 12 month period Note: • Include only ordinary securities here – other classes of equity securities cannot be added • Include here (if applicable) the securities the subject of the Appendix 3B to which this form is annexed • It may be useful to set out issues of securities on different dates as separate line items |
11,500,000 Ordinary shares (3 April 2017) 570,000 ordinary shares (9 June 2017) 2,110,000 ordinary shares (16 June 2017) 1,340,000 ordinary shares (6 July 2017) |
Subtract the number of fully paid +ordinary securities cancelled during that 12 month period |
Nil |
“A” |
167,378,969 |
Step 2: Calculate 15% of “A” |
|
“B” |
0.15 [Note: this value cannot be changed] |
Multiply “A” by 0.15 |
25,106,845 |
Step 3: Calculate “C”, the amount of placement capacity under rule 7.1 that has already been used |
|
Insert number of +equity securities issued or agreed to be issued in that 12 month period not counting those issued: • Under an exception in rule 7.2 • Under rule 7.1A • With security holder approval under rule 7.1 or rule 7.4 Note: • This applies to equity securities, unless specifically excluded – not just ordinary securities • Include here (if applicable) the securities the subject of the Appendix 3B to which this form is annexed • It may be useful to set out issues of securities on different dates as separate line items |
120,000 Ordinary shares (17 Mar 2017) 500,000 Incentive options (15 Sep 2017)
|
“C” |
620,000 |
Step 4: Subtract “C” from [“A” x “B”] to calculate remaining placement capacity under rule 7.1 |
|
“A” x 0.15 Note: number must be same as shown in Step 2 |
25,106,845 |
Subtract “C” Note: number must be same as shown in Step 3 |
620,000 |
Total [“A” x 0.15] – “C” |
24,486,845 [Note: this is the remaining placement capacity under rule 7.1] |
Part 2
Rule 7.1A – Additional placement capacity for eligible entities |
|
Step 1: Calculate “A”, the base figure from which the placement capacity is calculated |
|
“A” Note: number must be same as shown in Step 1 of Part 1 |
Not applicable |
Step 2: Calculate 10% of “A” |
|
“D” |
0.10 Note: this value cannot be changed |
Multiply “A” by 0.10 |
Not applicable |
Step 3: Calculate “E”, the amount of placement capacity under rule 7.1A that has already been used |
|
Insert number of +equity securities issued or agreed to be issued in that 12 month period under rule 7.1A Notes: • This applies to equity securities – not just ordinary securities • Include here – if applicable – the securities the subject of the Appendix 3B to which this form is annexed • Do not include equity securities issued under rule 7.1 (they must be dealt with in Part 1), or for which specific security holder approval has been obtained • It may be useful to set out issues of securities on different dates as separate line items |
Not applicable |
“E” |
Not applicable |
Step 4: Subtract “E” from [“A” x “D”] to calculate remaining placement capacity under rule 7.1A |
|
“A” x 0.10 Note: number must be same as shown in Step 2 |
Not applicable |
Subtract “E” Note: number must be same as shown in Step 3 |
Not applicable |
Total [“A” x 0.10] – “E” |
Not applicable Note: this is the remaining placement capacity under rule 7.1A |
Prairie Mining #PDZ – Strong Community Support as Jan Karski Environmental Permitting Advances
Prairie Mining Limited #PDZ is pleased to announce the formal submission of the Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (“ESIA”) and initiation of the public consultation process for its 100% owned high value ultra-low ash semi-soft coking coal (“SSCC”) Jan Karski Mine in the Lublin Province, south east Poland (“Jan Karski” or “Project”).
- Environmental permitting for Jan Karski advances following successful submission of the Environmental and Social Impact Assessment to the Lublin Regional Environment Directorate for Environmental Consent
- Community Consultation Program initiated in the Cyców municipality within Lublin Province, showing strong community support for development of Jan Karski
- 74% of residents of Lublin Province support the building of a new mine in the region per the results of a recent independent poll
- Overwhelming public support for the development of Jan Karski demonstrated across the region with residents agreeing a new mine would bring significant employment opportunities and economic development to the region
- China Coal Technical and Economic Studies for Jan Karski near completion with Prairie hosting China Coal and the Jinan Mine Design Institute in Poland to finalise capital cost estimates with Polish sub-contractors
- Jan Karski continues to be one of the most advanced new large scale coking coal projects in the Northern Hemisphere, advancing towards development alongside partners China Coal and CD Capital.
Prairie’s Chief Executive Officer Ben Stoikovich commented: “With the submission of the ESIA and initiation of the public consultation process, Prairie continues towards applying for a Mining Concession to commence construction of the Jan Karski Mine together with our strategic partner China Coal. We now look forward to submitting our Mining Concession application in the upcoming months.
A recent independent poll of residents demonstrates strong support from local communities for major investment and job creation in the Lublin region with construction of the Jan Karski Mine. It is extremely positive to see that 74% of the residents of Cyców support the construction of a new coal mine. Jan Karski is one of the most advanced coking coal projects of significant scale in the Northern Hemisphere and its development will provide substantial economic and social benefits for Eastern Poland. During November, we had the pleasure of hosting China Coal and the Jinan Mine Design Institute in Poland to finalise capital cost estimates for the Project and meet with Polish subcontractors. China Coal’s Technical and Economic Studies are now nearly complete and will underpin a Chinese bank debt financing package for the construction of Jan Karski.”
SUBMISSION OF ESIA & INITIATION OF PUBLIC CONSULTATION
An application for issuing the environmental decision together with the ESIA was submitted to the Regional Director for Environmental Protection (“RDOS”) in Lublin on 6 October 2017. Taking into account the RDOS’s additional comments the motion and ESIA were supplemented on 22 November 2017. The ESIA documentation meets all the formal requirements and is being reviewed by the RDOS.
Prairie is now waiting for approval of the ESIA in the form of Environmental Consent decision, which is the last component to meet all formal requirements to apply for the Mining Concession for construction of Jan Karski. Independent environmental consultants have confirmed Prairie has met all pre-requisite requirements and can expect an environmental permit in due course.
As part of the environmental permitting process, the first public consultation was held in the Cyców Municipality (“Cyców”) within Lublin Province (“Lublin”) on 18 November 2017. The public consultation was organised in accordance with international standards, specifically, International Finance Corporation (“IFC”) Standards. The meeting was attended by local residents of the Cyców, including the mayor of Cyców, Wiesław Pikula, and current employees of the neighbouring Bogdanka mine. A presentation on Jan Karski’s development plans was given by Mr Miroslaw Taras (Prairie’s Group Executive), Witold Wołoszyn (Prairie’s Environmental and Planning Manager) and specialists from the international environmental consulting group, Multiconsult Polska Sp. z o.o. which had prepared the ESIA. Key advantages for the local community related to employment opportunities and social benefits associated with the development, construction and operation of Jan Karski including:
- creation of 2,000 direct employment positions and 10,000 indirect jobs for the region once operational;
- increasing skills of the workforce and through the implementation of International Standard training programmes;
- stimulating the development of education, health services and communications within the region; and
- building a mine that creates new employment for generations to come and career paths for families to remain in the region.
Prairie remains on track to have its full application for a Mining Concession submitted for Jan Karski in the coming months. In Poland, a Mining Concession application comprises the approval of a Deposit Development Plan (“DDP”), a Spatial Development Plan (rezoning of land for mining use), and an ESIA in the form of an Environmental Consent decision. Jan Karski’s DDP and Spatial Development Plan have already been officially approved.
Granting of the Environmental Consent will fulfil all the regulatory prerequisites for the Company to submit a formal Mining Concession application.
INDEPENDENT POLL DEMONSTRATES STRONG COMMUNITY SUPPORT FOR MINE DEVELOPMENT
Centrum Badań Marketingowych INDICATOR Sp. z o.o. (“CBM Indicator”) – an independent polling company with over 25 years expertise in the Polish market – carried out extensive research on public support for mine development in Lublin. The poll indicated overwhelming support exists amongst residents and there is acute awareness of the importance of coal supply for the Polish economy. Results of the poll indicated 74% of those living in Lublin supported the construction of a new mine in the region.
Key results are summarised below:
Do you support the construction of a new mine in Lublin?
Yes – 74%
No – 26%
Do you believe domestic coal mining is essential to Poland’s economy?
Yes – 92%
No – 8%
Do you believe a new mine in Lublin will decrease unemployment?
Yes – 80%
No – 20%
Do you believe a new mine in Lublin will result in new infrastructure?
Yes – 72%
No – 28%
According to CBM Indicator’s poll, support for construction of a new mine in the area is extremely high in Cyców, where 82% of residents are aware of the vital role of coal for the Polish industry and 74% agree to a mine being built in their commune or in a neighbouring commune. Cyców already enjoys a lower unemployment rate and significantly better local infrastructure when compared to other municipalities in Lublin thanks to direct benefits of having Bogdanka operating adjacent to Cyców and consequently, residents of Cyców are familiar with the economic and social benefits mining can bring.
CHINA COAL STUDY FOR THE JAN KARSKI MINE NEARS COMPLETION
In November 2017, the Company hosted a delegation in Poland including China Coal No.5 Construction Company Ltd (“China Coal”) and the Chinese Government’s officially authorised coal mine design institute Jinan Mine Design Institute, during which capital cost estimates for the construction and operation of Jan Karski were finalised alongside domestic Polish specialists, subcontractors and partners who will provide relevant Polish content.
Following the Chinese delegations visit to Poland, China Coal is set to complete all Technical and Economic Studies (“Studies”) required and considered “bankable” by Chinese financing institutions. In accordance with the Strategic Co-operation Agreement between Prairie and China Coal, the Studies will form the basis for provision of debt financing for the construction and development of Jan Karski.
Upon completion of the Studies, Prairie and China Coal will advance Chinese bank credit approval to fund construction of the Project and enter into a complete Engineering, Procurement, and Construction (“EPC”) contract under which China Coal will construct the Jan Karski Mine.
For further information, please contact:
Prairie Mining Limited |
Tel: +44 207 478 3900 |
Ben Stoikovich, Chief Executive Officer |
Email: info@pdz.com.au |
Sapan Ghai, Head of Corporate Development |
To view all images and illustrations in this announcement, please refer to www.pdz.com.au.
Prairie Mining (PDZ) – September 2017 quarterly report; Jan Karski mine one of the most advanced coking coal projects in Northern Hemisphere
September 2017 Quarterly Report
HIGHLIGHTS
Debiensko Mine (Premium Hard Coking Coal)
Geo-technical Drill Program Underway
- In preparation for the upcoming next phase of project studies, a shallow geo-technical drill program was completed at Debiensko during the quarter.
- Results will be used for detailed design and engineering of surface structures associated with the shafts, coal handling and preparation plant and other surface facilities during the upcoming feasibility study.
Mine Site Redevelopment Program Update
- Focus during the quarter has been on planning the mine site’s redevelopment program, including:
- preparation for an in-fill drill program to increase JORC Measured and Indicated resources to support future feasibility studies;
- initial demolition works; and
- pre-qualification of study contractors.
Offtake Discussions Advance
- Prairie continued discussions with regional steel makers and coke producers for future coking coal sales and offtake.
- Highly favourable market fundamentals remain prominent as Europe’s steel industry continues to consume 47 Mt of hard coking coal annually, 85% of which is imported.
Jan Karski Mine (Semi-Soft Coking Coal)
Transformational Coking Coal Quality Results
- Coal quality results from latest drilling have transformed Jan Karski into a high-value ultra-low ash semi-soft coking coal project.
- Updated marketing and coal sales strategies have begun in the quarter following Prairie’s latest successful drilling results with Jan Karski’s semi-soft coking coal product expected to attract a 10% premium to international benchmark prices. Marketing and coal sales are strategies to be used in preliminary offtake discussions between Prairie and steel makers.
China Coal Studies Near Completion
- China Coal’s studies for the development of the Jan Karski Mine have significantly advanced and will incorporate the coal quality results from the latest drilling at Jan Karski. Studies are due to be finalised in the coming months.
- Under the Strategic Co-operation Agreement between Prairie and China Coal, the studies will support China Coal’s EPC contract to construct the Jan Karski Mine and will underpin a Chinese bank financing package.
Jan Karski Most Advanced Coking Coal Project in Northern Hemisphere
- Spatial development plan approved at Jan Karski meaning the rezoning of 56 hectares of agricultural land for industrial use is complete allowing for construction of a mine site, shafts and associated surface infrastructure.
- Prairie remains on track to submit a Mining Concession application for Jan Karski in the coming months following submission of the Environmental and Social Impact Assessment during October 2017.
Robust Coking Coal Fundamentals
Strong Price Environment Continues
- Coking coal price environment has remained strong throughout the quarter attributed to strong cash margins of Chinese steel mills, production cuts by some Chinese miners, and production disruptions in Australia.
Coking Coal Reconfirmed as a Critical Raw Material for Europe
- In Europe, coking coal remains on the European Commission’s 2017 revised list of Critical Raw Materials as European steel makers – including the newly-formed ThyssenKrupp Tata Steel Joint Venture – look to supply a changing automobile industry and numerous infrastructure programs.
- Increasing demand for ultra-low emission vehicles is expected to drive growth in steel supply to the European automobile industry – almost 0.5 tonnes of coking coal are required to produce the structural, electrical and plated steel for each electric car.
- UK infrastructure projects including the High Speed 2 Rail Line and the construction of the Hinkley Point C Nuclear Power Station are expected to use over 3 million tonnes of steel – equivalent to 375 London Olympic Stadiums.
- According to BHP Billiton, China’s Belt and Road Initiative to advance globalisation and trading – and which includes several European countries including Poland – could result in up to 150 million tonnes of incremental steel demand.
- Prairie’s two large-scale Tier One assets are ideally positioned to supply coking coal to meet Europe’s steel demand in the future.
Corporate
- Prairie and CD Capital completed an additional investment of US$2.0 million (A$2.6 million) in the form of non-redeemable, non-interest-bearing convertible loan notes.
- Prairie has cash reserves of A$17 million. With CD Capital’s right to invest a further A$55 million as a cornerstone investor, plus with the Strategic Co-operation Agreement Prairie has with China Coal for financing and construction of Jan Karski, Prairie is in a strong financial position to progress with its planned development activities at Debiensko and Jan Karski.
Ben Stoikovich, Chief Executive Officer commented “Following coal quality testing that demonstrated premium quality ultra-low ash semi-soft coking coal at Jan Karski, it is clear that we hold one of the most advanced coking coal projects of significant scale in the Northern Hemisphere. Alongside our partner China Coal, we are nearing completion of all requisite studies required to facilitate already advanced discussions with Chinese debt providers. Jan Karski’s development will provide substantial economic and social benefits for Eastern Poland and we look forward to submitting our Mining Concession application shortly. At Debiensko, we continue works in order to restart the mine at a time when long term coking coal supply has become increasingly important to the European steel industry.“
For further information, please contact:
Prairie Mining Limited |
+44 20 7478 3900 |
Ben Stoikovich, Chief Executive Officer |
|
Sapan Ghai, Head of Corporate Development |
DEBIENSKO MINE
The Debiensko Mine is a fully permitted, hard coking coal project located in the Upper Silesian Coal Basin in the south west of the Republic of Poland. It is approximately 40 km from the city of Katowice and 40 km from the Czech Republic.
Debiensko is bordered by the Knurow-Szczyglowice Mine in the north west and the Budryk Mine in the north east, both owned and operated by Jastrzębska Spółka Węglowa SA(JSW), Europe’s leading producer of hard coking coal.
The Debiensko mine was originally opened in 1898 and was operated by various Polish mining companies until 2000 when mining operations were terminated due to a major government led restructuring of the coal sector caused by a downturn in global coal prices. In early 2006 New World Resources Plc (“NWR”) acquired Debiensko and commenced planning for Debiensko to comply with Polish mining standards, with the aim of accessing and mining hard coking coal seams. In 2008, the Minister of Environment of Poland (“MoE”) granted a 50-year mine license for Debiensko.
In October 2016, Prairie acquired Debiensko with a view that a revised development approach would potentially allow for the early mining of profitable premium hard coking coal seams, whilst minimising upfront capital costs. Prairie has proven expertise in defining commercially robust projects and applying international standards in Poland. The fact that Debiensko is a former operating mine and its proximity to two neighbouring coking coal producers in the same geological setting, reaffirms the significant potential to successfully bring Debiensko back into operation.
Premium Quality Hard Coking Coal
Preliminary analysis indicates that a range of premium hard coking coals that will be in high demand from European steelmakers can be produced from Debiensko. This analysis is based on historical data, neigbouring operational coking coal mines and the results of a suite of modern coking tests performed on selected seams from a fully cored borehole drilled by the previous owners in 2015/16. Two premium hard coking coal specifications have been delineated from select seams at Debiensko, namely Medium volatile matter hard coking coal (“Mid-vol HCC”) and Low volatile matter hard coking coal (“Low-vol HCC”). Future study phases will determine the precise Debiensko premium hard coking coal quality specification on a year by year basis depending on final adopted mine plan, mining schedule and extent of coal blending.
Both Debiensko’s Mid-vol and Low-vol HCC lie within the range of premium hard coking coals produced globally. Indications are that the Mid-vol HCC at Debiensko is present between 850 m to 1,000 m from surface and the Low-vol HCC is present 1,000 m to 1,300 m below surface i.e. at depths similar to adjacent operating mines owned by JSW – the largest coking coal producer in Europe.
Preparation for the Next Phase of Project Studies
Drilling of 28 shallow geo-technical holes completed during the quarter. Information from the drill holes will be used for engineering design of foundations for structures associated with the shafts, coal handling and preparation plant (“CHPP”) and other surface facilities. These holes are essential in order to assess the soil conditions, properly design structural foundations and thus provide more accurate pricing in the tenders as required for a feasibility study.
Pre-qualification of contractors for the major components of the next phase of Debiensko studies commenced during the quarter including:
- Drilling contractors for the planned in-fill drilling program (to update measured and indicated resources);
- CHPP;
- Shafts and bulk coal winder;
- Desalination plant; and
- Surface facilities.
The tender process for construction of the desalination plant is now underway with final specifications near completion.
Demolition of old surface structures of the former Debiensko mine including the bathhouse, switchgear building and locomotive garage was completed during the quarter. Further structures including walkways and old administrative buildings have been earmarked for demolition during the following quarter.
JAN KARSKI MINE
Transformational Coking Coal Quality Results Establish Jan Karski as a High Value Ultra-Low Ash Semi-Soft Coking Coal Mine
Following the latest drilling results at the Jan Karski Mine, Prairie announced coal quality testwork which confirmed the mine to be a high-value ultra-low ash semi-soft coking coal project. An Independent assessment by specialist coking coal market consultants predicts that Jan Karski ultra-low ash SSCC would potentially realise a 10% premium to international benchmark prices.
Preliminary discussions between Prairie and select European steel makers have confirmed the suitability of ultra-low ash SSCC to be utilised in coke oven blends. Consequently, the Company is currently updating the marketing and sales strategy for the coal which will be produced at Jan Karski and will incorporate this strategy into the studies.
China Coal Progress and Financing Discussions
In November 2016, Prairie and China Coal, China’s second largest coal mining company and one of the world’s most advanced and prolific shaft sinking and underground coal mine construction companies signed a landmark Strategic Co-operation Agreement for the financing and construction of the Jan Karski Mine.
Under the terms of the agreement China Coal is set to complete all studies required by Chinese financing institutions earmarked to provide financing for the construction and development of Jan Karski. Drafts of the Studies were submitted to Prairie in the previous quarter following which the Company hosted two delegations in Poland from China including: leading underground mine construction company and partner of Prairie, China Coal No.5 Construction Company Ltd. (“CC5C”); Chinese Government’s officially authorised coal mine design institute Jinan Mine Design Institute (“Jinan”); and China’s first large scale foreign trade corporation specialising in international engineering contracting, China National Machinery Import & Export Corporation (“CMC”).
The Chinese delegations were welcomed by the government-appointed Governor of Lublin Province and elected regional government officials of the Lublin region. Prairie conducted various site visits and facilitated meetings with domestic Polish contractors and suppliers who could participate in the construction of Jan Karski.
Prairie and China Coal’s technical teams continue to work together to:
- agree a final version of the Studies which will form the basis of Chinese bank credit approval for funding construction of Jan Karski;
- enter into a complete Engineering, Procurement, and Construction (“EPC”) contract under which CC5C to construct Jan Karski; and
- incorporate relevant Polish content into the design and construction phases which will include working with a range of Polish specialists, sub-contractors and business partners.
Spatial Planning (Rezoning) Approval
Following completion of community consultation and submission by Prairie of all applications required to change the local spatial development plan to affect the rezoning of land for mining use, the Gmina (Municipality) of Siedliszcze officially adopted a new spatial development plan that will allow for the construction of the Jan Karski mine site in the location of Kulik.
The Resolution of the Town Council of Siedliszcze on to adopt the zoning plan was passed during the quarter completing yet another significant milestone towards Prairie obtaining a Mining Concession for Jan Karski.
The spatial planning approval process was conducted in parallel with approval by Poland’s Ministry of Agriculture for the rezoning of 56 hectares of agricultural land to be designated for industrial (mining) purposes. These 56 hectares are in the Kulik area where the Jan Karski mine shafts and major surface facilities will be located, as per the approved Jan Karski Deposit Development Plan (“DDP”) and the ongoing China Coal Bankable Feasibility Study.
Spatial planning approval was granted following the achievement by Prairie of another significant permitting milestone following official approval by the Lublin Regional Mining Authority of the Jan Karski DDP in May 2017 (refer to ASX announcement dated 25 May 2017).
Prairie remains on track to have its full application for a Mining Concession submitted for Jan Karski in the coming months. In Poland, a Mining Concession application comprises the approval of a DDP, a spatial development plan (rezoning of land for mining use), and an Environmental Social Impact Assessment (“ESIA”) in the form of an Environmental Consent decision.
Jan Karski’s DDP and Spatial Development Plan have now been officially approved and the ESIA was submitted following the quarter end. Granting of the Environmental Consent will fulfil all the regulatory prerequisites for the Company to submit a formal Mining Concession application.
CORPORATE
Additional Investment by CD Capital
In August 2017 following shareholder approval, Prairie completed the second convertible note investment with its cornerstone investor CD Capital Natural Resources Fund III LP (“CD Capital”). In July 2017, final investment terms were agreed for Prairie to issue a non-redeemable, non-interest-bearing, unsecured convertible loan notes for an aggregate principal amount of US$2.0 million (A$2.6 million) to CD Capital.
Financial Position
Prairie has cash reserves of A$17 million. With CD Capital’s additional U$2 million (A$2.6 million) investment now completed and their right to invest a further A$55 million as a cornerstone investor, plus with the Strategic Co-operation Agreement Prairie has with China Coal for financing and construction of Jan Karski, Prairie is in a strong financial position to progress with its planned development activities at Debiensko and Jan Karski.
Forward Looking Statements
This release may include forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based on Prairie’s expectations and beliefs concerning future events. Forward looking statements are necessarily subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are outside the control of Prairie, which could cause actual results to differ materially from such statements. Prairie makes no undertaking to subsequently update or revise the forward-looking statements made in this release, to reflect the circumstances or events after the date of that release.
APPENDIX 1 – EXPLORATION TENEMENT INFORMATION
As at 30 September 2017, the Company has an interest in the following tenements:
Location |
Tenement |
Percentage Interest |
Status |
Tenement Type |
Jan Karski, Poland |
Jan Karski Mine Plan Area (K-4-5, K-6-7, K-8 and K-9)* |
100 |
Granted |
Exclusive Right to apply for a mining concession |
Jan Karski, Poland |
Kulik (K-4-5) |
100 |
Granted |
Exploration |
Jan Karski, Poland |
Syczyn (K-8) |
100 |
Granted |
Exploration |
Jan Karski, Poland |
Kopina (K-9) |
100 |
Granted |
Exploration |
Jan Karski, Poland |
Sawin-Zachód |
100 |
Granted |
Exploration |
Debiensko, Poland |
Debiensko 1** |
100 |
Granted |
Mining |
Debiensko, Poland |
Kaczyce 1 |
100 |
Granted |
Mining & Exploration (includes gas rights) |
* On 1 July 2015, the Company announced that it had secured the Exclusive Right to apply for, and consequently be granted, a mining concession for Jan Karski. As a result of its geological documentation for Jan Karski deposit being approved, Prairie is now the only entity that can lodge a mining concession application over Jan Karski within a three (3) year period.
The approved geological documentation covers an area comprising of all four of the original exploration concessions granted to Prairie (K-4-5, K-6-7, K-8 and K-9) and includes the full extent of the targeted resources within the mine plan for Jan Karski. In this regard, no beneficial title interest has been surrendered by the Company when the K-6-7 exploration concession expired during the quarter. The Company intends to submit a mining concession application, over the mine plan area at Jan Karski (which includes K-6-7) within the next 12 months. Under Polish mining law, and owing to the Exclusive Right the Company has secured, Prairie is the only entity that may apply for and be granted a mining concession with respect to the K-6-7 area (the Exclusive Right also applies to the K-4-5, K-8 and K-9 areas of Jan Karski). There is no requirement for the Company to hold an exploration concession in order exercise the Exclusive Right and apply for a mining concession.
** Under the terms of the Debiensko Mining Concession issued in 2008 by the MoE (which is valid for 50 years from grant date), commencement of production is to occur by 1 January 2018. Not commencing production by 2018 will not infringe on the validity and expiry date (June 2048) of the Mining Concession, however in December 2016, the Company did make an application to the MoE to amend the Debiensko Mining Concession to alter the date for commencement of production from 2018 to 2025 with a decision still pending.
To view this announcement in full including all illustrations and figures please refer to www.pdz.com.
+Rule 5.5
Appendix 5B
Mining exploration entity and oil and gas exploration entity quarterly report
Introduced 01/07/96 Origin Appendix 8 Amended 01/07/97, 01/07/98, 30/09/01, 01/06/10, 17/12/10, 01/05/13, 01/09/16
Name of entity |
||
PRAIRIE MINING LIMITED |
||
ABN |
Quarter ended (“current quarter”) |
|
23 008 677 852 |
30 September 2017 |
Consolidated statement of cash flows |
Current quarter $A’000 |
Year to date |
||
1. |
Cash flows from operating activities |
– |
– |
|
1.1 |
Receipts from customers |
|||
1.2 |
Payments for |
(1,456) |
(1,456) |
|
(a) exploration & evaluation |
||||
(b) development |
– |
– |
||
(c) production |
– |
– |
||
(d) staff costs |
(605) |
(605) |
||
(e) administration and corporate costs |
(240) |
(240) |
||
1.3 |
Dividends received (see note 3) |
– |
– |
|
1.4 |
Interest received |
119 |
119 |
|
1.5 |
Interest and other costs of finance paid |
– |
– |
|
1.6 |
Income taxes paid |
– |
– |
|
1.7 |
Research and development refunds |
– |
– |
|
1.8 |
Other (provide details if material) (a) Business development costs (b) Property rental and gas sales |
(317) 141 |
(317) 141 |
|
1.9 |
Net cash from / (used in) operating activities |
(2,358) |
(2,358) |
|
2. |
Cash flows from investing activities |
(22) |
(22) |
|
2.1 |
Payments to acquire: |
|||
(a) property, plant and equipment |
||||
(b) tenements (see item 10) |
– |
– |
||
(c) investments |
– |
– |
||
(d) other non-current assets |
– |
– |
||
2.2 |
Proceeds from the disposal of: |
– |
– |
|
(a) property, plant and equipment |
||||
(b) tenements (see item 10) |
– |
– |
||
(c) investments |
– |
– |
||
(d) other non-current assets |
– |
– |
||
2.3 |
Cash flows from loans to other entities |
– |
– |
|
2.4 |
Dividends received (see note 3) |
– |
– |
|
2.5 |
Other (provide details if material) |
– |
– |
|
2.6 |
Net cash from / (used in) investing activities |
(22) |
(22) |
|
3. |
Cash flows from financing activities |
– |
– |
|
3.1 |
Proceeds from issues of shares |
|||
3.2 |
Proceeds from issue of convertible notes |
2,627 |
2,627 |
|
3.3 |
Proceeds from exercise of share options |
– |
– |
|
3.4 |
Transaction costs related to issues of shares, convertible notes or options |
(179) |
(179) |
|
3.5 |
Proceeds from borrowings |
– |
– |
|
3.6 |
Repayment of borrowings |
– |
– |
|
3.7 |
Transaction costs related to loans and borrowings |
– |
– |
|
3.8 |
Dividends paid |
– |
– |
|
3.9 |
Other (provide details if material) |
66 |
66 |
|
3.10 |
Net cash from / (used in) financing activities |
2,514 |
2,514 |
|
4. |
Net increase / (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents for the period |
16,809 |
16,809 |
|
4.1 |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|||
4.2 |
Net cash from / (used in) operating activities (item 1.9 above) |
(2,358) |
(2,358) |
|
4.3 |
Net cash from / (used in) investing activities (item 2.6 above) |
(22) |
(22) |
|
4.4 |
Net cash from / (used in) financing activities (item 3.10 above) |
2,514 |
2,514 |
|
4.5 |
Effect of movement in exchange rates on cash held |
– |
– |
|
4.6 |
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
16,943 |
16,943 |
|
5. |
Reconciliation of cash and cash equivalents |
Current quarter |
Previous quarter |
5.1 |
Bank balances |
5,443 |
4,809 |
5.2 |
Call deposits |
11,500 |
12,000 |
5.3 |
Bank overdrafts |
– |
– |
5.4 |
Other (provide details) |
– |
– |
5.5 |
Cash and cash equivalents at end of quarter (should equal item 4.6 above) |
16,943 |
16,809 |
6. |
Payments to directors of the entity and their associates |
Current quarter |
6.1 |
Aggregate amount of payments to these parties included in item 1.2 |
(284) |
6.2 |
Aggregate amount of cash flow from loans to these parties included in item 2.3 |
Nil |
6.3 |
Include below any explanation necessary to understand the transactions included in items 6.1 and 6.2 |
|
Payments include executive remuneration (including bonuses), director fees, superannuation and provision of a fully serviced office. |
7. |
Payments to related entities of the entity and their associates |
Current quarter |
7.1 |
Aggregate amount of payments to these parties included in item 1.2 |
– |
7.2 |
Aggregate amount of cash flow from loans to these parties included in item 2.3 |
– |
7.3 |
Include below any explanation necessary to understand the transactions included in items 7.1 and 7.2 |
|
Not applicable
|
8. |
Financing facilities available |
Total facility amount at quarter end |
Amount drawn at quarter end |
8.1 |
Loan facilities |
– |
– |
8.2 |
Credit standby arrangements |
– |
– |
8.3 |
Other (please specify) |
– |
– |
8.4 |
Include below a description of each facility above, including the lender, interest rate and whether it is secured or unsecured. If any additional facilities have been entered into or are proposed to be entered into after quarter end, include details of those facilities as well. |
||
9. |
Estimated cash outflows for next quarter |
$A’000 |
9.1 |
Exploration and evaluation |
(1,500) |
9.2 |
Development |
– |
9.3 |
Production |
– |
9.4 |
Staff costs |
(500) |
9.5 |
Administration and corporate costs |
(200) |
9.6 |
Other (provide details if material) |
|
9.7 |
Total estimated cash outflows |
(2,350) |
10. |
Changes in tenements |
Tenement reference and location |
Nature of interest |
Interest at beginning of quarter |
Interest at end of quarter |
10.1 |
Interests in mining tenements and petroleum tenements lapsed, relinquished or reduced |
– |
– |
– |
– |
10.2 |
Interests in mining tenements and petroleum tenements acquired or increased |
– |
– |
– |
– |
Compliance statement
1 This statement has been prepared in accordance with accounting standards and policies which comply with Listing Rule 19.11A.
2 This statement gives a true and fair view of the matters disclosed.
[lodged electronically without signature]
Sign here: …………………………………………………… Date: 31 October 2017
(Director/Company secretary)
Print name: Dylan Browne
Notes
1. The quarterly report provides a basis for informing the market how the entity’s activities have been financed for the past quarter and the effect on its cash position. An entity that wishes to disclose additional information is encouraged to do so, in a note or notes included in or attached to this report.
2. If this quarterly report has been prepared in accordance with Australian Accounting Standards, the definitions in, and provisions of, AASB 6: Exploration for and Evaluation of Mineral Resources and AASB 107: Statement of Cash Flows apply to this report. If this quarterly report has been prepared in accordance with other accounting standards agreed by ASX pursuant to Listing Rule 19.11A, the corresponding equivalent standards apply to this report.
3. Dividends received may be classified either as cash flows from operating activities or cash flows from investing activities, depending on the accounting policy of the entity.