Home » Posts tagged 'rehabilitation'

Tag Archives: rehabilitation

#SVML Sovereign Metals LTD – Half-year Report

INTERIM FINANCIAL REPORT

FOR THE HALF YEAR ENDED

31 DECEMBER 2024

 

abn 71 120 833 427

ASX: SVM; aim:SVML; OTCQX: SVMlf

 

CORPORATE DIRECTORY

Directors
Mr Benjamin Stoikovich          Chairman

Mr Frank Eagar                        Managing Director and CEO

Mr Ian Middlemas                   Non-Executive Director

Dr Julian Stephens                  Non-Executive Director

Mr Mark Pearce                      Non-Executive Director

Mr Nigel Jones                                      Non-Executive Director

 

CFO and Company Secretary
Mr Dylan Browne

 

London Office
Unit 3C, 38 Jermyn Street, London
SW1Y 6DN, United Kingdom
Telephone: +44 207 478 3900

 

Cape Town Office

Ground Floor, Block C,
The Terraces, Steenberg Office Park
Cape Town, South Africa

Telephone: +27 21 065 1890

 

Operations Office

Area 4

Lilongwe

Malawi

 

Registered and Principal Office
Level 9, 28 The Esplanade
Perth WA 6000
Telephone: +61 8 9322 6322

 

Stock Exchange Listings
Australia

Australian Securities Exchange
ASX Code: SVM – Ordinary Shares

 

United Kingdom

London Stock Exchange (AIM)

AIM Code: SVML – Depository Interests

 

Quotations

United States

OTCQX Best Market

OTCQX code: SVMLF

Nominated Advisor & Broker

SP Angel Corporate Finance LLP

Prince Frederick House

35-39 Maddox Street

London W1S 2PP, United Kingdom

Brokers

Stifel Nicolaus Europe Limited
150 Cheapside

London EC2V 6ET

United Kingdom

T: +44 20 7710 7600

 

Berenberg, Gossler & Co, KG, London Branch
60 Threadneedle Street
London EC2R 8HP
United Kingdom
T: +44 20 3753 3132

 

Share Register
Australia

Computershare Investor Services Pty Ltd
Level 17
221 St Georges Terrace
Perth  WA  6000
Telephone:                  1300 850 505
International:              +61 8 9323 2000
Facsimile:                     +61 8 9323 2033

 

United Kingdom

Computershare Investor Services PLC
The Pavilions,
Bridgewater Road,
Bristol BS99 6ZZ
Telephone: +44 370 702 0000

 

Solicitors
Thomson Geer

Simmons & Simmons

 

Auditor
Ernst & Young – Perth

 

Bankers
Australia – National Australia Bank Limited

Malawi – Standard Bank

 

CONTENTS

 

Directors’ Report

Consolidated Statement of Profit or Loss and Other Comprehensive Income

Consolidated Statement of Financial Position

Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity

Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows

Notes to the Financial Statements

Directors’ Declaration

Competent Person Statement

Auditor’s Independence Declaration

Independent Auditor’s Review Report

 

DIRECTORS’ REPORT

The Directors of Sovereign Metals Limited present their report on Sovereign Metals Limited (Sovereign or the Company or Parent) and the entities it controlled at the end of, or during, the half year ended 31 December 2024 (Consolidated Entity or Group).

REVIEW AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

KASIYA RUTILE-GRAPHITE PROJECT

Sovereign is focused on the development of its Kasiya rutile-graphite project (Kasiya or the Project) in Malawi. The recently completed Optimised Pre-Feasibility Study (OPFS) confirmed Kasiya as a potentially major critical minerals project delivering industry-leading economic returns and sustainability metrics.

The Company’s objective is to develop a large-scale, long life rutile-graphite operation, focusing on developing an environmentally and socially responsible, sustainable operation.

A map of a project Description automatically generated

Figure 1: Kasiya Regional Project Location

HIGHLIGHTS DURING AND SUBSEQUENT TO PERIOD END

Optimised PFS Results Reaffirm Kasiya’s Globally Strategic Significance

·           In January 2025, the OPFS was completed with oversight from Sovereign-Rio Tinto Technical Committee

·           Results of the OPFS reaffirm Kasiya’s potential to become the largest and lowest-cost producer of natural rutile and natural flake graphite while generating exceptional economics

·           Various optimisations have led to superior project delivery, operational flexibility, environmental and social outcomes compared to the 2023 Prefeasibility Study (PFS)

Pilot Phase Advanced to Rehabilitation Stage following Mining Trials and Backfilling

·           In December 2024, material mined and stockpiled during the Pilot Mining and Land Rehabilitation (Pilot Phase) was placed back in the test pit, filling it to its original ground level

·           On-site soil remediation and land rehabilitation activities are underway, testing Sovereign’s proposed rehabilitation approach and demonstrating how mined land can support sustainable farming post-closure

Rio Tinto Invests Additional A$19m Increasing Shareholding to 19.9%

·           In July 2024, Rio Tinto invested a further A$18.5 million via the exercise of options to increase its shareholding in Sovereign. To date Rio Tinto has invested A$60 million for 19.9% of Sovereign

Positive Test Results for Use of Kasiya Graphite

·           Very high quality Coated Spherical Purified Graphite (CSPG) anode material produced from Kasiya graphite concentrate with performance characteristics comparable to highest quality natural graphite battery material produced by dominant Chinese anode manufacturers

·           In November 2024, Sovereign announced that preliminary tests confirmed that graphite concentrate produced from Kasiya exhibits prerequisite characteristics for selling graphite to the refractory materials sector

·           In February 2025, further test work confirmed Kasiya’s graphite also has the key characteristics required for use in expandable (fire retardant) and expanded (gaskets, seals, and brake lining) applications

Infill Drilling Program Complete

·           In October 2024, Sovereign announced the completion of an infill drilling program designed to upgrade Kasiya’s Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE) and to facilitate conversion of Ore Reserves from Probable to Proven category, with the upgrade due in the coming months

Next Steps

·           Sovereign will continue to advance the Definitive Feasibility Study (DFS), provide updates on the rehabilitation component of the Pilot Phase, publish an upgrade to the MRE, continue with further graphite testwork to support potential offtake discussions and further its community and social development programs in Malawi

A large area of dirt with a hole in the middle Description automatically generated with medium confidence An aerial view of a farm AI-generated content may be incorrect.

Figure 2: Pilot Phase test pit during mining trials (left) and subsequently backfilled and rehabilitated (right)

Optimised PFS Results Reaffirm Kasiya’s Globally Strategic Significance

Subsequent to the half year, the Company announced the results of an OPFS for Kasiya which was undertaken following a strategic investment by Rio Tinto Mining and Exploration Limited (Rio Tinto) in 2023. Under the Investment Agreement, a joint Technical Committee was established to oversee the development of Kasiya; the OPFS was conducted with oversight from the Sovereign-Rio Tinto Technical Committee.

Following input from various organisations, including internationally recognised, independent consultancies, the Company’s owner’s team, and subject matter experts from Rio Tinto, the OPFS has reconfirmed Kasiya as a leading global future supplier of strategic critical minerals outside of China.

The OPFS proposes a large-scale, long-life operation to deliver substantial volumes of natural rutile and graphite while generating significant returns. Table 1 below summarises the key findings from the OPFS and includes a comparison to the PFS results released 16 months ago, in September 2023. It is important to note that the results for the 2023 PFS in Table 1 have not been updated or adjusted for inflation since their release.

TABLE 1: KEY OPFS METRICS

 

 

 

 

Units

OPFS Results

Jan 25

2023 PFS

Sep 23

Production

 

 

Initial Mine Life

Years

25

25

Plant Throughput (Stage 1: Years 1-4)

Mtpa

12

12

Plant Throughput (Stage 2: Years 5-25)

Mtpa

24

24

Average Annual Rutile Produced (95%+TiO2)

ktpa

222

222

Annual Average Graphite Produced (96% TGC)*

ktpa

233

244

Operating and Capital Expenditure

 

 

Capex to First Production (Stage 1)

US$M

665

597

Total LOM Development Capex

US$M

1,127

1,250

Total LOM Sustaining Capex

US$M

397

470

Operating Costs (FOB Nacala)

US$/t product

423

404

Financial Performance

 

 

Total Revenue*

US$M

16,367

16,121

Annual Revenue (Average LOM)

US$M

640

645

Annual EBITDA (Average LOM)

US$M

409

415

NPV8 (real, pre-tax)

US$M

2,322

2,419

IRR (pre-tax)

%

27%

32%

Revenue to Cost Ratio

x

2.8

2.8

*Annual average graphite produced includes 292kt of graphite processed and sold in two years post cessation of active ore mining. Average graphite produced during the 25-year initial mine life only is 240ktpa; total revenue during the same period is US$15,990 million. All rutile is produced and sold during the 25-year initial mine life. Note: All cashflows and costs are presented in US$ real January 2025 terms unless otherwise stated. Operating costs exclude mineral royalties and community development support costs.

Summary of Optimisations

The OPFS optimises seven key areas compared to the 2023 PFS, as summarised below.

Mining Method

The PFS proposed a 25-year initial LOM based on a hydraulic mining process where slurry material would be screened and pumped overland to the processing plants.

Based on findings from the mining trials undertaken as part of the Pilot Phase, the OPFS proposes a large-scale open-pit dry mining operation using draglines and trucking of material to the processing plants. The change in mining method has not changed the initial mine life of 25 years.

Operating Model

The 2023 PFS envisaged mining would take place on a contractor basis.

During the OPFS, Sovereign undertook a trade-off analysis between the following operating options:

·           Fully owner-operated mine with draglines and trucks purchased by the owner

·           Owner-operated mine with draglines and trucks leased by the owner

·           Mining contractor operation using excavators and trucks

Due to the preference for draglines and benefit of flexibility, an owner-operated mine with leased equipment is selected as the preferred operating model.

Plant Configuration

Dry mining Kasiya means the material received at the plant is not pre-wet and pre-scrubbed. Therefore, the OPFS proposes a process plant front end consisting of two scrubbers and two oversize screens per 12Mt plant. No further changes are proposed to the processing plant flowsheet.

Plant Location

Per the 2023 PFS, mining would commence in the southern area of the Kasiya deposit, ramping up to 12Mt per annum (Mtpa) and then scaling up to 24Mtpa in Year 5 by constructing a second plant module in the same area, reaching nameplate capacity by the end of that year.

In Year 10 of production, another new 12Mtpa plant module would be built and commissioned in the northern area of Kasiya, supported by the relocation to the north of one of the southern plants to maintain a steady state of 24Mtpa.

However, the OPFS has determined the most efficient plant locations to be an initial 12Mtpa South Kasiya plant followed by the construction of another 12Mtpa North Kasiya plant in year 5 of production, negating any relocation requirements in later years.

The OPFS maintains the ROM schedule with operations commencing with 12Mtpa of throughput during the first four years of production (Stage 1) and expanding to 24Mtpa in year 5, with full capacity reached by end of year 5 (Stage 2).

Tailings Management

Per the PFS, a conventional process would be used to produce rutile and graphite concentrate with tailings in separate sand and fines streams being pumped to a conventional TSF. Mined out pit areas would be backfilled as part of a rehabilitation process. 

The OPFS proposes maximising backfilling of pits as undertaken during the Pilot Phase and the introduction of mud farming on the TSF to accelerate dewatering. This approach has reduced tailings volumes in the TSF by 44% from 187 Mm³ to 105 Mm³.

Mud farming is a technique used by Rio Tinto at operations such as its 100%-owned Weipa bauxite operations in Queensland, Australia, which has been in production since 1963 and produced 35.1Mt of bauxite in 2023.

Water Management

The PFS proposed that the primary water supply for the Kasiya mining complex would be created by building a water storage dam and collecting run-off water from the greater catchment area. Following the introduction of dry mining and mud farming, the size of the water storage dam proposed in the PFS has been significantly reduced, with less process water required and more process water recovered.

The OPFS mining trials and material deposition tests indicated a water demand of 10.2 Mm³ per annum, almost a 40% decrease in water requirement from the PFS (16.7 Mm³). The effect on the  water storage dam wall could be a reduction in volume from 0.79 Mm³ to 0.57 Mm³ and a reduction in dam wall height from 20 metres to 17 metres.

Power

The 2023 PFS envisaged a hybrid hydro-generated grid power plus solar power system solution.

The Malawi grid reliability has improved since completion of the PFS and is expected to further improve considerably with the commissioning of the country’s first HV transmission interconnector to Mozambique in Q2 2025.

This will provide the Project with sufficient power and therefore the OPFS proposes to connect the Project’s power system to the hydro-sourced grid network only. This mitigates any risks associated with commissioning a new solar power project and reducing the overall power tariff by eliminating the need for an Independent Power Producer as per the 2023 PFS.

Pilot Phase Advanced to Rehabilitation Stage Following Mining Trials and Backfilling

In December 2024, the Company announced that the test pit mined during the Pilot Phase at the Kasiya Project had been successfully backfilled. This allowed Sovereign to commence on-site soil remediation and land rehabilitation activities, testing our proposed rehabilitation approach and demonstrating that the mined land can support sustainable farming post-closure.

During the Pilot Phase mining trials, 170,000m3 was mined using a conventional excavator fleet. The fleet was used to place mined material back into the pit, filling the pit to the original ground level in less than two months and ahead of schedule.

In March 2025, the Company announced the success of the rehabilitation program with landowners given immediate access to land to start maize crop farming without missing a planting season.

Positive Test Results for Use of Kasiya Graphite in Refractory and Expandable Markets

The Company has announced that downstream testwork targeting the traditional graphite market, conducted at leading independent consultancies ProGraphite GmbH (ProGraphite) and Dorfner Anzaplan (DorfnerA) in Germany, have delivered very positive test results, which will be used for customer engagement and potential offtake discussions.

Preliminary tests confirmed that graphite concentrate produced from Kasiya in Malawi exhibits prerequisite characteristics required for graphite sales into the refractory materials sector and for use in expandable (fire retardant) and expanded (gaskets, seals, and brake lining) applications.

Traditional demand for natural graphite is primarily tied to the steel industry where it is used as a component in bricks that line both blast and electric arc furnaces (“refractories”) and as a liner for ladles and crucibles. It is used in brake linings, gaskets and clutch materials in the automotive industry. Graphite has many other industrial uses in lubricants, carbon brushes for electric motors, fire retardants, and insulation and reinforcement products.

Graphite’s key properties for use in refractory applications are its resistance to oxidation, chemical inertness and good thermal conductivity.

A key use for expandable graphite is as a flame retardant. Growth for expandable graphite flame retardants, is driven by concerns over halogen-based flame retardants, which include brominated and chlorinated flame retardants. Many of these chemicals are now recognised as global contaminants and are associated with adverse health effects in animals and humans, including endocrine and thyroid disruption, immunotoxicity, reproductive toxicity, and cancer (National Institute of Health).

Expanded graphite is used in gaskets, seals, brake linings, bi-polar plates for fuel cells, and thermal management in electronic devices, where the inherent properties of graphite are combined with the flexibility of expanded graphite.

 

A blue pie chart with white text AI-generated content may be incorrect.

Figure 3: Natural graphite market per application (Benchmark Minerals Intelligence, 2025)

Infill Drilling Program Complete

In October 2024, the Company announced the completion of an infill drilling program at Kasiya to support an upgrade of the MRE.

Aircore drilling, supported by hand auger, push tube and diamond core drilling, was completed in the southern part of Kasiya. The drilling was focused on the designated pits proposed to provide ore feed in the first eight years of the Project’s production schedule. Ore Reserves in these areas are expected to convert from the Probable to Proven category with an upgrade of the current MRE from Indicated to the Measured category under the JORC (2012) Code. 

Offsite laboratories in South Africa and Australia will assay all samples for rutile and graphite. The drilling program’s results and subsequent Resource upgrade are expected in early 2025.

Kasiya is already the world’s largest rutile deposit and second-largest flake graphite deposit, with over 66% of the current MRE in the Indicated category.

Corporate Update

Sovereign remains in a strong financial position with cash at bank of approximately A$34 million and no debt.

Next Steps

The Company plans to update the market on the following progress in the coming months:

·           Planned MRE upgrade

·           Further graphite test work results as the Company continues to advance the qualification of its graphite product for the lithium-ion battery and traditional graphite sectors

·           Progress in discussions with future potential end-users of rutile and graphite

·           Updates on community and social development programs

·           Further rehabilitation aspects of the Pilot Phase

·           Progress of the DFS, which is targeted for completion in Q4, 2025

 

DIRECTORS

The names of Directors in office at any time during the financial period or since the end of the financial period are:

Mr Benjamin Stoikovich      Chairman

Mr Frank Eagar                      Managing Director and CEO

Mr Ian Middlemas                Non-Executive Director

Dr Julian Stephens                Non-Executive Director

Mr Mark Pearce                    Non-Executive Director

Mr Nigel Jones                      Non-Executive Director

All Directors were in office from 1 July 2024 until the date of this report, unless otherwise noted.

OPERATING RESULTS

The net operating loss after tax for the half year ended 31 December 2024 was $19,546,116 (2023: $6,976,503) which is attributable to:

(i)         Interest income of $1,025,751 (2023: $938,402) earned on cash term deposits held by the Group;

(ii)        exploration and evaluation expenditure of $16,495,513 (2023: $5,027,397) in relation to the Kasiya Project. This is attributable to the Group’s accounting policy of expensing exploration and evaluation expenditure incurred by the Group subsequent to acquisition of the rights to explore and up to the completion of feasibility studies; and

(iii)       non-cash share based payment expenses of $1,904,852 (2023: $1,089,974) relating to performance rights. The fair value of incentive options and rights is measured at grant date and recognised over the period during which the performance rights holders become unconditionally entitled to the incentive securities.

FINANCIAL POSITION

At 31 December 2024, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $33,531,689 (30 June 2024: $31,564,130) and no debt (30 June 2024: nil). The Company had net assets of $35,927,994 (30 June 2024: $34,358,774), an increase of $1,569,220 or approximately 4% compared with the prior period. This is largely attributable to the increase in cash reserves following the investment made by Rio Tinto in the period offset by exploration and evaluation spend on the project to complete the Pilot Phase and OPFS.  

SIGNIFICANT POST BALANCE DATE EVENTS

On 22 January 2025, the Company announced the results of an OPFS for Kasiya which reaffirm Kasiya’s potential to become the largest and lowest-cost producer of natural rutile and natural flake graphite while generating exceptional economics.

Other than the above, there are no matters or circumstances which have arisen since 31 December 2024 that have significantly affected or may significantly affect:

·       the operations, in periods subsequent to 31 December 2024, of the Group;

·       the results of those operations, in periods subsequent to 31 December 2024, of the Group; or

·       the state of affairs, in periods subsequent to 31 December 2024, of the Group.

AUDITOR’S INDEPENDENCE DECLARATION

Section 307C of the Corporations Act 2001 requires our auditors, Ernst & Young, to provide the directors of Sovereign Metals Limited with an Independence Declaration in relation to the review of the half year financial report. This Independence Declaration is on page 17 and forms part of this Directors’ Report.

This report is made in accordance with a resolution of the directors made pursuant to section 306(3) of the Corporations Act 2001.

 

For and on behalf of the Directors

 

 

Frank Eagar

Managing Director and CEO

7 March 2025

 

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF PROFIT OR LOSS AND OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

FOR THE HALF YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2024

 

Notes

Half Year Ended
31 December 2024
$

Half Year Ended
31 December 2023
$

Interest income

1,025,751

938,402

Exploration and evaluation expenses

(16,495,513)

(5,027,397)

Corporate and administrative expenses

(779,930)

(572,119)

Business development expenses

(1,004,695)

(996,548)

Share based payment expense

9(a)

(1,904,852)

(1,089,974)

Other expenses

3

(386,877)

(173,386)

Demerger expenses

(55,481)

Loss before income tax

 

(19,546,116)

(6,976,503)

Income tax expense

Loss for the period

 

(19,546,116)

(6,976,503)

 

Other comprehensive income, net of income tax:

Items that may be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss

Exchange differences on foreign entities

80,624

3,530

Other comprehensive income for the period, net of income tax

80,624

3,530

Total comprehensive loss for the period

 

(19,465,492)

(6,972,973)

Loss attributable to members of Sovereign Metals Limited

 

(19,465,492)

(6,972,973)

 

Total comprehensive loss attributable to members of Sovereign Metals Limited

 

(19,465,492)

(6,972,973)

 

Basic and diluted loss per share from continuing operations (cents per share)

(3.3)

(1.1)

 

 

The above Consolidated Statement of Profit or Loss and Other Comprehensive Income should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.

 

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION

AS AT 31 DECEMBER 2024

 

Notes

31 December 2024
$

30 June 2024
$

ASSETS

Current Assets

Cash and cash equivalents

33,531,689

31,564,130

Other receivables

4

506,258

315,597

Other financial assets

 

175,000

560,000

Total Current Assets

 

34,212,947

32,439,727

 

 

 

Non-current Assets

 

 

Property, plant and equipment

5

2,009,700

1,149,771

Exploration and evaluation assets

6

5,086,129

5,086,129

Total Non-current Assets

 

7,095,829

6,235,900

 

 

 

TOTAL ASSETS

 

41,308,776

38,675,627

 

 

LIABILITIES

 

 

Current Liabilities

 

 

Trade and other payables

 

5,184,642

4,138,353

Provisions

 

86,849

56,782

Other financial liabilities

7(a)

41,378

35,288

Total Current Liabilities

 

5,312,869

4,230,423

 

 

 

Non-Current Liabilities

 

 

Other financial liabilities

7(b)

67,913

86,430

Total Non-Current Liabilities

 

67,913

86,430

 

 

 

TOTAL LIABILITIES

 

5,380,782

4,316,853

NET ASSETS

 

35,927,994

34,358,774

 

 

EQUITY

 

 

Issued capital

8

136,965,491

117,835,631

Reserves

9

(1,374,794)

(3,360,270)

Accumulated losses

(99,662,703)

(80,116,587)

TOTAL EQUITY

35,927,994

34,358,774

 

 

The above Consolidated Statement of Financial Position should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.

 

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY

FOR THE HALF YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2024

 

Issued Capital
$

Share Based Payment Reserve
$

Demerger Reserve

$

Foreign Currency Translation Reserve

$

Accumulated Losses
$

Total Equity
$

Balance at 1 July 2024

117,835,631

3,605,751

(7,336,678)

370,657

(80,116,587)

34,358,774

Net loss for the period

(19,546,116)

(19,546,116)

Other comprehensive income

80,624

80,624

Total comprehensive income/(loss) for the period

80,624

(19,546,116)

(19,465,492)

Transactions with owners, recorded directly in equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issue of placement shares

19,174,395

19,174,395

Cancelation of unvested performance rights

(22,754)

(22,754)

Share based payment expense

1,927,606

1,927,606

Share issue costs

(44,535)

(44,535)

Balance at 31 December 2024

136,965,491

5,510,603

(7,336,678)

451,281

(99,662,703)

35,927,994

Balance at 1 July 2023

74,508,488

4,155,950

(7,336,678)

(139,498)

(61,515,693)

9,672,569

Net loss for the period

(6,976,503)

(6,976,503)

Other comprehensive income

3,530

Total comprehensive income/(loss) for the period

3,530

Transactions with owners, recorded directly in equity

Issue of placement shares

40,598,258

40,598,258

Transfer from SBP reserve upon conversion of performance rights

2,853,400

(2,853,400)

Share based payment expense

1,089,974

1,089,974

Share issue costs

(124,515)

Balance at 31 December 2023

117,835,631

2,392,524

(7,336,678)

(135,968)

(68,492,196)

44,263,313

 

 

The above Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.

 

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE HALF YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2024

 

Half Year Ended
31 December 2024
$

Half Year Ended
31 December 2023
$

Cash flows from operating activities

Payments to suppliers and employees – exploration and evaluation

(15,479,030)

(5,433,663)

Payments to suppliers and employees – other

(1,764,767)

(1,616,960)

Interest received

1,031,209

744,942

Net cash used in operating activities

(16,212,588)

(6,305,681)

 

Cash flows from investing activities

 

Payments for purchase of plant and equipment

(916,061)

(205,902)

Repayment of loan receivable from NGX Limited

34,434

Net cash used in investing activities

(916,061)

(171,468)

 

Cash flows from financing activities

 

Proceeds from issue of shares

19,174,395

40,598,258

Payments for share issue costs

(44,535)

(248,778)

Payments for finance lease

(31,777)

Net cash from financing activities

19,098,083

40,349,480

 

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents

1,969,434

33,872,331

Net foreign exchange differences

(1,875)

Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period

31,564,130

5,564,376

Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period

33,531,689

39,436,707

 

The above Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.

 

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE HALF YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2024

 

1.       MATERIAL ACCOUNTING POLICY INFORMATION

Sovereign Metals Limited (the “Company”) is a for profit company limited by shares and incorporated in Australia, whose shares are publicly traded on the Australian Securities Exchange, the AIM Market of the London Stock Exchange and a Quotation on OTCQX in the U.S. The consolidated interim financial statements of the Company as at and for the period from 1 July 2024 to 31 December 2024 comprise the Company and its subsidiaries (together referred to as the “Group”). The nature of the operations and principal activities of the Group are as described in the Directors’ Report.

This interim financial report does not include all the notes of the type normally included in an annual financial report. Accordingly, this report is to be read in conjunction with the audited annual report of Sovereign for the year ended 30 June 2024 (where comparative amounts have been extracted from) and any public announcements made by the Group during the interim reporting period in accordance with the continuous disclosure requirements of the Corporations Act 2001.

(a)       Basis of Preparation of Half Year Financial Report

The consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the basis of historical cost, except for the revaluation of certain financial instruments. Cost is based on the fair values of the consideration given in exchange for assets.  All amounts are presented in Australian dollars, unless otherwise stated. There have been no changes in the critical accounting judgements or key sources of estimation since 30 June 2024.

(b)       Statement of Compliance

The consolidated interim financial report complies with Australian Accounting Standards, including AASB 134 which ensures compliance with International Financial Reporting Standard (“IFRS”) IAS 34 “Interim Financial Reporting” as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board. The accounting policies adopted in the preparation of the half-year financial report are consistent with those applied in the preparation of the Group’s annual financial report for the year ended 30 June 2024, except for new standards, amendments to standards and interpretations effective 1 July 2024. In the current half year, the Group has adopted all of the new and revised Standards and Interpretations issued by the AASB that are relevant to its operations and effective for the current annual reporting period. The adoption resulted in no material impact.

(c)       Issued standards and interpretations not early adopted

Australian Accounting Standards and Interpretations that have recently been issued or amended but are not yet effective have not been adopted by the Group for the reporting period ended 31 December 2024. Those which may be relevant to the Group are set out in the table below. The impact of these standards are still being assessed.

Standard/Interpretation

Application Date of Standard

Application Date for Group

AASB 2014-10 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards – Sale or

Contribution of Assets between an Investor and its Associate or Joint Venture

1 January 2025

1 July 2025

AASB 18 Presentation and Disclosure in Financial Statements

1 January 2027

1 July 2027

2.       SEGMENT INFORMATION

AASB 8 requires operating segments to be identified on the basis of internal reports about components of the Consolidated Entity that are regularly reviewed by the chief operating decision maker in order to allocate resources to the segment and to assess its performance. The Consolidated Entity has one operating segment, being exploration in Malawi.

3.       OTHER EXPENSES

31 December 2024
$

31 December 2023
$

Foreign exchange (loss)/gain

(1,877)

1,614

Fair value movements in other financial assets

(385,000)

(175,000)

 

(386,877)

(173,386)

4.       CURRENT ASSETS – OTHER RECEIVABLES

31 December 2024
$

30 June 2024
$

Accrued interest

140,454

145,913

GST receivable

95,664

81,051

Prepayments

203,559

52,655

Other

66,581

35,978

 

506,258

315,597

5.       NON-CURRENT ASSETS – PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

Office Furniture and Equipment

$

Computer Equipment

$

Plant & Equipment

$

Right of use

$

Assets under construction

$

Total

$

Carrying amount at
1 July 2024

152,163

68,566

496,953

 

116,447

 

315,642

1,149,771

Additions

31,758

30,516

768,298

73,062

903,634

Depreciation charge

(15,546)

(17,761)

(64,801)

(21,663)

(119,771)

Foreign exchange differences

10,217

3,557

33,604

4,257

24,431

76,066

Carrying amount at
31 December 2024

178,592

84,878

1,234,054

 

99,041

 

413,135

2,009,700

At cost

227,879

153,292

1,803,664

134,091

388,704

2,707,630

Accumulated depreciation, amortisation and impairment

(49,287)

(68,414)

(569,610)

(35,050)

24,431

(697,930)

6.       EXPLORATION AND EVALUATION ASSETS

31 December 2024
$

(a)        Movement in Exploration and Evaluation Assets

Kasiya Rutile-Graphite Project:

Carrying amount as at 1 July 2024

5,086,129

Carrying amount at 31 December 2024(i)

5,086,129

Note:

(i)               The ultimate recoupment of costs carried forward for exploration and evaluation is dependent on the successful development and commercial exploitation or sale of the respective areas of interest.

7.       OTHER FINANCIAL LIABILITIES

31 December 2024
$

30 June 2024
$

(a)        Current liabilities

Lease Liability(i)

41,378

35,288

(b)        Non-Current liabilities

 

Lease Liability(i)

67,913

86,430

Note:

(i)               The Company has a lease agreement for the rental of a property. Refer to Note 5 for the carrying amount of the right of use asset relating to the lease. The following are amounts recognised in the Statement of Profit and Loss: (i) amortisation expense of right of use asset $21,663 (30 June 2024: $17,454); (ii) interest expense on lease liabilities of $14,311 (30 June 2024: $12,961); and (iii) rent expense of $5,660 (30 June 2024: $7,922).

8.       CONTRIBUTED EQUITY

31 December 2024
$

30 June 2024
$

(a)        Issued and Paid Up Capital

599,879,879 (30 June 2024: 563,003,401) fully paid ordinary shares (Note 8(b))

136,965,491

117,835,631

(b)       Movements in Ordinary Share Capital were as follows:

Date

Details

Number of Shares


$

1 Jul 24

Opening balance

563,003,401

117,835,631

4 Jul 24

Issue of ordinary shares on exercise of Rio Tinto Options

34,549,598

18,484,035

13 Sep 24

Issue of ordinary shares to Rio Tinto

1,290,392

690,360

13 Sep 24

Issue of advisory fee shares

1,036,488

31 Dec 24

Share issue costs

(44,535)

31 Dec 24

Closing balance

599,879,879

136,965,491

9.       RESERVES

31 December 2024
$

30 June 2024
$

Share-based Payments Reserve (Note 9(a))

5,510,603

3,605,751

Foreign Currency Translation Reserve – exchange differences

451,281

370,657

Demerger Reserve

(7,336,678)

(7,336,678)

 

(1,374,794)

(3,360,270)

(a)       Movements in Options and Performance Rights were as follows:

Date

Details

Number of Unlisted  Performance Rights


$(i)

1 Jul 2024

Opening balance

17,860,000

3,605,751

Various

Issue of performance rights

4,725,000

31 Dec 2024

Cancelation of unvested performance rights

(425,000)

(22,754)

31 Dec 2024

Share based payment expense

1,927,606

31 Dec 2024

Closing balance

22,160,000

5,510,603

Note

(i)               The value of performance rights granted during the period is estimated as at the grant date based on the underlying share price with the expense recognised over the vesting period in accordance with Australian Accounting Standards.

10.     COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

(a)     Commitments

 

31 December 2024
$

30 June 2024
$

Exploration Commitments – Kasiya Rutile-Graphite Project:

Within one year

201,477

107,155

After one year but not more than five years

82,043

46,705

 

283,520

153,860

As a condition of retaining the current rights to tenure to exploration tenements, the Group is required to pay an annual rental charge and meet minimum expenditure requirements for each tenement. These obligations are not provided for in the financial statements and are at the sole discretion of the Group. The majority of the remaining exploration commitments relate to licences with a term greater than one year. For the purposes of disclosure, the Group has apportioned the remaining commitments on an equal monthly basis over the remaining term of the exploration licences.

(b)       Contingencies

At the last annual reporting date, the Consolidated Entity did not have any material contingent liabilities.  There has been no material change in contingent assets and liabilities of the Consolidated Entity during the half year.

11.     DIVIDENDS PAID OR PROVIDED FOR

No dividend has been paid or provided for during the half year (2023: nil).

12.     FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The net fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities approximates their carrying value.

13.     SUBSEQUENT EVENTS AFTER BALANCE DATE

On 22 January 2025, the Company announced the results of an OPFS for Kasiya which reaffirm Kasiya potential to become the largest and lowest-cost producer of natural rutile and natural flake graphite while generating exceptional economics.

Other than the above, there are no matters or circumstances which have arisen since 31 December 2024 that have significantly affected or may significantly affect:

·       the operations, in periods subsequent to 31 December 2024, of the Group;

·       the results of those operations, in periods subsequent to 31 December 2024, of the Group; or

·       the state of affairs, in periods subsequent to 31 December 2024, of the Group.

 

DIRECTORS’ DECLARATION

 

In accordance with a resolution of the Directors of Sovereign Metals Limited, I state that:

In the opinion of the Directors:

(a)       the financial statements and notes thereto are in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001, including:

(i)         complying with Accounting Standard AASB 134: Interim Financial Reporting and the Corporations Regulations 2001; and

(ii)        giving a true and fair view of the consolidated entity’s financial position as at 31 December 2024 and of its performance for the half year ended on that date.

(b)       there are reasonable grounds to believe that the Company will be able to pay its debts as and when they become due and payable.

This declaration is signed in accordance with a resolution of the Board of Directors made pursuant to section 303(5) of the Corporations Act 2001.

On behalf of the Board

 

 

Frank Eagar

Managing Director and CEO

 

7 March 2025

 

 

Competent Person Statement

The information in this announcement that relates to Production Targets, Ore Reserves, Processing, Infrastructure and Capital and Operating Costs is extracted from an announcement dated 22 January 2025, which is available to view at www.sovereignmetals.com.au. Sovereign confirms that: a) it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in the original announcement; b) all material assumptions and technical parameters underpinning the Production Target, and related forecast financial information derived from the Production Target included in the original announcement continue to apply and have not materially changed; and c) the form and context in which the relevant Competent Persons’ findings are presented in this presentation have not been materially modified from the original announcement.

The information in this announcement that relates to the Exploration Results (metallurgy – rutile and graphite) is extracted from announcements dated 8 May 2024, 15 May 2024, 4 September 2024, 21 November 2024, 19 February 2025 and 26 February 2025 which are available to view at www.sovereignmetals.com.au. Sovereign confirms that a) it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in the original announcement; b) all material assumptions included in the original announcement continue to apply and have not materially changed; and c) the form and context in which the relevant Competent Persons’ findings are presented in this report have not been materially changed from the announcement.

The information in this announcement that relates to the Mineral Resource Estimate is extracted from Sovereign’s 2024 Annual Report and is based on, and fairly represents information compiled by Mr Richard Stockwell, a Competent Person, who is a fellow of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (AIG). Mr Stockwell is a principal of Placer Consulting Pty Ltd, an independent consulting company. Sovereign confirms that a) it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in the original announcement; b) all material assumptions included in the 2024 Annual Report continue to apply and have not materially changed; and c) the form and context in which the relevant Competent Persons’ findings are presented in 2024 Annual Report have not been materially changed from the disclosure in the 2024 Annual Report.

Ore Reserve for the Kasiya Deposit

 

Classification

Tonnes
(Mt)

Rutile Grade
(%)

Contained Rutile
(Mt)

Graphite Grade (TGC) (%)

Contained Graphite
(Mt)

RutEq. Grade*
(%)

Proved

Probable

 538

1.03%

5.5

1.66%

8.9

2.00%

Total

 538

1.03%

5.5

1.66%

8.9

2.00%

* RutEq. Formula: Rutile Grade x Recovery (100%) x Rutile Price (US$1,484/t) + Graphite Grade x Recovery (67.5%) x Graphite Price (US$1,290/t) / Rutile Price (US$1,484/t). All assumptions are from the Kasiya PFS ** Any minor summation inconsistencies are due to rounding

Kasiya Total Indicated + Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate at 0.7% rutile cut-off grade (inclusive of Ore Reserves)

Classification

Resource
(Mt)

Rutile Grade
(%)

Contained Rutile
(Mt)

Graphite Grade (TGC) (%)

Contained Graphite
(Mt)

Indicated

 1,200

1.0%

12.2

1.5%

18.0

Inferred

 609

0.9%

5.7

1.1%

6.5

Total

 1,809

1.0%

17.9

1.4%

24.4

Forward Looking Statement

This release may include forward-looking statements, which may be identified by words such as “expects”, “anticipates”, “believes”, “projects”, “plans”, and similar expressions. These forward-looking statements are based on Sovereign’s expectations and beliefs concerning future events. Forward looking statements are necessarily subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are outside the control of Sovereign, which could cause actual results to differ materially from such statements. There can be no assurance that forward-looking statements will prove to be correct. Sovereign makes no undertaking to subsequently update or revise the forward-looking statements made in this release, to reflect the circumstances or events after the date of that release.

 

AUDITOR’S INDEPENDENCE DECLARATION

A close-up of a document AI-generated content may be incorrect.

INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REVIEW REPORT

A close-up of a document AI-generated content may be incorrect.

A close-up of a letter AI-generated content may be incorrect.

 

#SVML Sovereign Metals LTD – Successful Rehabilitation of Kasiya Test Pit

SUCCESSFUL REHABILITATION OF KASIYA TEST PIT

·   

Kasiya Rehabilitation Program provides landowners with immediate access to land to start maize crop farming without missing a planting season

·   

Site backfill completed; soil improvement and planting of rehabilitation crops commenced in December 2024

·   

Sovereign continues to provide support and training to landowners to improve crop yields, including introducing conservation farming techniques, which have already resulted in a tripling of crop yields

·   

Significant variety of rehabilitation crops, including giant bamboo, sunhemp, groundnuts and mung beans, are being tested alongside staple maize crops

·   

Rehabilitation Program successfully demonstrates how mined land can be quickly and efficiently returned to productive agriculture during future full-scale operations

 

 

 

Sovereign Metals Limited (ASX:SVM; AIM:SVML; OTCQX: SVMLF) (Sovereign or the Company) is pleased to announce that rehabilitation of the land at the test pit site mined during the Pilot Mining and Land Rehabilitation Program (Pilot Phase) at its Kasiya Rutile-Graphite Project (Kasiya or the Project) in Malawi has been substantially progressed. Soils remediation work was concluded in December 2024 with landowners accessing the site between December 2024 and January 2025 to plant and cultivate crops without missing a planting season.

Managing Director and CEO Frank Eagar commented: “The successful return of farmers to their land within such a short time and without missing a single planting season after mining and backfilling 170,000m3 is an excellent outcome. This demonstration of responsible mining and land rehabilitation will build on our positive community relationships. The pilot phase of 90 farmers selected for our Conservation Farming program has been increased to 350 for this season. Early indications are that the second season of this program will exceed the 300% yield increases achieved in the pilot phase. The empirical data collected from these trials will feed directly into our Definitive Feasibility Study designs for mine closure and land rehabilitation.

 A close-up of a field AI-generated content may be incorrect.

Figures 1 & 2: Maize and bamboo intercrop with different levels of maturity (February 2025)

All soil remediation works as well as planting was done by hand with the use of a grader and tractor to prepare the soils. Sovereign appointed the local landowners to work with us in both the soil remediation and planting work, so they were able to directly experience and learn about our rehabilitation work on their land.

Sovereign is working closely with the landowners to ensure that the crops provide a good yield in 2025, while simultaneously testing a variety of rehabilitation crops. This includes the intercropping of giant bamboo with maize, which will be retained by the landowners.

Sovereign is committed to ensuring that all mined-out land is appropriately rehabilitated to support sustainable farming practices after closure. The soil remediation methods aim to revitalise the soils within a two-to-three-year timeframe and to ensure that soils can be sustainably farmed in the long term. The remediation of soil to a depth of 1 metre from surface, will ensure the land can support small-scale or full-commercial farming operations.

A collage of different images of land AI-generated content may be incorrect.

As part of the Pilot Phase, the Company has constructed small rehabilitation demonstration pits that will be used to illustrate multiple and ongoing rehabilitation processes.

Rehabilitation Approach

The rehabilitation approach has been based on agronomic principles, including promoting sustainable farming practices and providing various land uses post mining activities.

Rehabilitation is underway through a five-step process:

Step 1: Introduce Lime (Complete)

The soil remediation commenced with the application and incorporation of locally sourced dolomitic lime (calcium and calcium-magnesium-carbonate) to improve naturally low PH levels.

Step 2: Introduce Carbon and Basic Nutrients (Complete)

Sovereign augmented the mined area with organic carbon and basic nutrients. Tests include the application of biochar (to provide carbon) and fertiliser (in the form of potash (MOP), phosphate (MAP) and a blend of nitrogen, potash and sulphur (NPK) 15:23:16).

Step 3: Grading, Ripping and Discing (Complete)

Lime, biochar, and fertiliser were incorporated into the soil through grading, ripping, and discing using graders and locally sourced farming equipment. This ensured that the land was level along with safe working conditions. 

Step 4: Planting of Rehabilitation Crops (In Progress)

Since December 2024, Sovereign has progressively been planting various rehabilitation crops to maximise the benefit of the coming summer rainfall. Giant bamboo has been introduced in 4 by 8-metre blocks, which will act as the primary crop to enhance carbon and bio-activity in the remediated soils. Maize and other cover crops have been intercropped between the giant bamboo within re-organised farm blocks.

Step 5: Monitoring and Evaluation (In Progress)

Sovereign continues to monitor soil remediation, plant growth and crop yields. As part of stakeholder engagement, the Company is working with local farmers to improve results through conservation farming, composting operations, testing new seed varieties and establishing an indigenous, fruit and farming nursery. This is serving as a live demonstration of rehabilitation and timely return of land to a pre-mining state.

 

Enquires

Frank Eagar, Managing Director & CEO

South Africa / Malawi

+27 21 140 3190

 

Sapan Ghai, CCO

London

+44 207 478 3900

 

Nominated Adviser on AIM and Joint Broker

 

SP Angel Corporate Finance LLP

+44 20 3470 0470

Ewan Leggat

Charlie Bouverat

 

 

Joint Brokers

 

Stifel

+44 20 7710 7600

Varun Talwar

 

Ashton Clanfield

 

 

 

Berenberg

+44 20 3207 7800

Matthew Armitt

 

Jennifer Lee

 

 

 

Buchanan

+ 44 20 7466 5000

 

 

#SVML Sovereign Metals LTD – Hydraulic Mining Trial Commences

HYDRAULIC MINING TRIAL COMMENCES

·     Hydraulic mining trial has now commenced at Kasiya Pilot Site as part of ongoing Optimisation Study

·   Trial is being conducted by Fraser Alexander, a global industry leader in hydraulic mining, following successful completion of dry mining trial in July 2024

·    Hydraulic mining trial is expected to take approximately three months to complete and includes backfilling of main trial pit, deposition and rehabilitation testwork

·     Previous testwork suggests soft, friable nature of Kasiya orebody should be suitable for hydraulic mining

·     Pilot Phase continues to progress with oversight from Sovereign-Rio Tinto Technical Committee

·   Rio Tinto has elected to increase its shareholding to 19.9% via an additional investment of A$0.7 million in Sovereign

 

A large open pit with a water pipe Description automatically generated with medium confidence

Figure 1: Hydraulic mined material (slurry) flows freely to the collection point in the bottom of the sump.

Sovereign Metals Limited (ASX: SVM; AIM: SVML; OTCQX: SVMLF) (Sovereign or the Company) is pleased to announce the commencement of a hydraulic mining trial at its Kasiya Rutile-Graphite Project (Kasiya or Project) in Malawi as part of the ongoing Pilot Mining and Land Rehabilitation Program (Pilot Phase). The hydraulic mining trial aims to further develop previous testwork as part of the Kasiya Optimisation Study.

Managing Director and CEO, Frank Eagar commented: “With valuable insights gained from the dry-mining approach at Kasiya, we are now entering the next phase, which includes the commencement of the hydraulic mining tests, processing and backfilling material, and progressing towards the rehabilitation phase, which we expect to take three months to complete. Results from the Pilot Phase, in particular the analysis of dry-mining versus hydraulic mining, will be fundamental for the ongoing Optimisation Study.”

Classification 2.2: This announcement includes Inside Information

RIO TINTO TO INCREASE ITS SHARHOLDING TO 19.9%

On 17 July 2023, the Company announced that Rio Tinto Mining and Exploration Limited (Rio Tinto) had made an investment of $40.4 million in the Company through the issue of 83,095,592 fully paid ordinary shares (Shares) and 34,549,598 unlisted Options (Rio Tinto Options).

On 3 July 2024, the Company announced that Rio Tinto had exercised the Rio Tinto Options and the Company subsequently issued 34,549,598 Shares to Rio Tinto to raise an additional $18.5 million (before costs).

Rio Tinto has advised the Company that it has elected to make an additional investment of A$690,360 in Sovereign through the issue of 1,290,392 Shares (Additional Shares) to Rio Tinto pursuant to Rio Tinto’s first right of refusal on equity issues in accordance with the Investment Agreement between Rio Tinto and the Company dated 16 July 2023. Subject to the issue of Additional Shares, Rio Tinto will increase its shareholding in Sovereign to 19.9%.

HYDRAULIC MINING TRIAL

The saprolite-hosted mineralisation at Kasiya is predominantly homogenous, with consistent physical properties across the 1.8 billion tonne Mineral Resource Estimate. Pilot Phase data from the dry-mining trial has confirmed that no drilling, blasting, crushing, grinding, or milling is needed before stockpiling material for processing into rutile and graphite products.

The temporary water storage pond, constructed and sealed with natural clay from excavated material, has been filled with six million litres of ground water, predominantly from eight water boreholes on site. This water will be used during the hydraulic mining trial and continuously recycled from the constructed holding cells where sand and fines fractions will be stored respectively prior to the planned deposition and rehabilitation testwork.

Figure 2: Overview of the hydraulic mining trial.

All hydraulic mining equipment is skid-mounted for ease of operation and mobility. A barge-mounted pump, transports the slurry from the sump to a vibrating screen.

A blue object in a river Description automatically generated

Figure 3: A pump, mounted to a barge, pumps the slurry to a vibrating screen.

Screen underflow is collected in a screen underpan and pumped through a stacker cyclone. The cyclone generates a -45 micron slurry on the overflow and a +45 micron sand on the underflow. This process is designed to replicate plant conditions where these fractions are produced as tailings, and will be used in subsequent in-pit deposition test work.

The overflow slurry is transferred to a settling pond, where it will settle, allowing for the recovery of approximately 34% of the water, which will be returned to the water storage pond. The concentrated slurry, along with the sand discharge from the cyclone underflow, will be used for the next set of tests in the in-pit deposition phase.

Land rehabilitation will be a key part of the ongoing Optimisation Study. Sovereign’s objective is to restore land post mining to conditions that match or surpass existing agricultural yields. The Pilot Phase will showcase to local communities the successful rehabilitation of land for agriculture post-mining. These efforts will also help Sovereign refine excavation and backfill techniques.

Blending test work will commence after the completion of the hydraulic mining tests. This phase will involve backfilling the seven individual test pits using various ratios of fines and sand to be followed by soil remediation and rehabilitation testwork.

Several machines in a field Description automatically generated

Figure 4: The train of high-pressure pumps used to drive the water monitor are skid-mounted.

Figure 5: +2mm oversize is screened out using a vibrating screen.

 

ENQUIRIES

Frank Eagar (South Africa/Malawi)
Managing Director

+27 21 065 1890

Sam Cordin (Perth)
Business Development

+61(8) 9322 6322

Sapan Ghai (London)
CCO

+44 207 478 3900

 

Nominated Adviser on AIM and Joint Broker

 

SP Angel Corporate Finance LLP

+44 20 3470 0470

Ewan Leggat

Charlie Bouverat

 

 

Joint Brokers

 

Stifel

+44 20 7710 7600

Varun Talwar

 

Ashton Clanfield

 

 

 

Berenberg

+44 20 3207 7800

Matthew Armitt

 

Jennifer Lee

 

 

 

Buchanan

+ 44 20 7466 5000

Competent Person Statement

The information in this announcement that relates to the Mineral Resource Estimate is extracted from an announcement dated 5 April 2023 entitled ‘Kasiya Indicated Resource Increased by over 80%’ which is available to view at www.sovereignmetals.com.au and is based on, and fairly represents information compiled by Mr Richard Stockwell, a Competent Person, who is a fellow of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (AIG). Mr Stockwell is a principal of Placer Consulting Pty Ltd, an independent consulting company. Sovereign confirms that a) it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in the original announcement; b) all material assumptions included in the original announcement continue to apply and have not materially changed; and c) the form and context in which the relevant Competent Persons’ findings are presented in this announcement have not been materially changed from the original announcement.

Kasiya Total Indicated + Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate at 0.7% rutile cut-off grade

Classification

Resource
(Mt)

Rutile Grade
(%)

Contained Rutile
(Mt)

Graphite Grade (TGC) (%)

Contained Graphite
(Mt)

Indicated

 1,200

1.0%

12.2

1.5%

18.0

Inferred

 609

0.9%

5.7

1.1%

6.5

Total

 1,809

1.0%

17.9

1.4%

24.4

Forward Looking Statement

This release may include forward-looking statements, which may be identified by words such as “expects”, “anticipates”, “believes”, “projects”, “plans”, and similar expressions. These forward-looking statements are based on Sovereign’s expectations and beliefs concerning future events. Forward looking statements are necessarily subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are outside the control of Sovereign, which could cause actual results to differ materially from such statements. There can be no assurance that forward-looking statements will prove to be correct. Sovereign makes no undertaking to subsequently update or revise the forward-looking statements made in this release, to reflect the circumstances or events after the date of that release.

The information contained within this announcement is deemed by the Company to constitute inside information as stipulated under the Market Abuse Regulations (EU) No. 596/2014 as it forms part of UK domestic law by virtue of the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 (‘MAR’). Upon the publication of this announcement via Regulatory Information Service (‘RIS’), this inside information is now considered to be in the public domain.

#SVML Sovereign Metals LTD – Dry Mining Trial Successfully Completed

DRY MINING TRIAL SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED AT PILOT PHASE TEST PIT

·   Pilot Phase dry mining trial confirms Kasiya can be efficiently mined using standard mobile excavators and trucks, demonstrating operational alternatives as part of ongoing PFS Optimisation Study

·     Test pit mined as planned and on schedule to a depth of 20 metres, excavating approximately 170,000 bench cubic metres

·   Simple and efficient dry mining undertaken with free-dig and soft, friable nature of the Kasiya orebody confirming no drilling or blasting required for excavation

·   Ore extracted with zero strip ratio successfully stockpiled with no requirement to crush or grind prior to use as processing plant feed

·    Hydraulic mining trials to begin in coming weeks with six million litre water storage pond currently filled to 80% capacity

·   Pilot Phase continues to progress as part of ongoing PFS Optimisation Study with oversight from Sovereign-Rio Tinto Technical Committee·

Classification 2.2: This announcement includes Inside Information

A large open pit with many layers of dirt Description automatically generated with medium confidence

Figure 1: Kasiya Pilot Phase Test Pit mined to 20 metres depth

Sovereign Metals Limited (ASX: SVM; AIM: SVML; OTCQX: SVMLF) (Sovereign or the Company) is pleased to announce that the dry mining trial is now complete with a test pit successfully excavated as part of the ongoing Pilot Mining and Land Rehabilitation Program (Pilot Phase) at the Company’s Kasiya Rutile-Graphite Project (Kasiya) in Malawi.

The test pit covers the planned area of 120 metres by 110 metres and has been excavated to a depth of 20 metres through the weathered ore at Kasiya. This confirms Kasiya ore can be efficiently mined using conventional dry-mining techniques and a simple mobile excavator fleet. The pit is accessible through a 10-metre-wide ramp constructed at appropriate geotechnical angles.

Managing Director, Frank Eagar commented: “Completion of the test pit at this scale marks a significant achievement. The mining, hydrology and geotechnical data collected throughout is invaluable in our understanding of the orebody and the simplicity of a potential dry-mining operation at Kasiya. We now look forward to the next steps of the pilot phase including the hydraulic mining trial, cyclone separation of ore, backfilling of test pits and soil rehabilitation.”

For the test pit, the dry mining fleet consisted of four excavators, 20 trucks and a support fleet including two bulldozers and a motor grader. The saprolite-hosted mineralisation at Kasiya is largely homogenous and has relatively consistent physical properties throughout the 1.8 billion tonnes Mineral Resource Estimate. Data collected from the pilot phase confirmed that no drilling, blasting, crushing, grinding or milling will be required prior to stockpiling material for processing into rutile and graphite products; an indication of potentially lower mining costs and a lower carbon footprint comparable to hard rock deposits.

Figure 2: Kasiya mining and front-end processing vs. hard rock peers

A construction vehicle in a quarry Description automatically generated with medium confidenceA construction vehicle in a quarry Description automatically generated

Figures 3 & 4: Simple excavator fleet mining the test pit

Approximately 170,000 bench cubic metres of material has been mined as part of the test-pit program. Steady-state operations envisage 24 million tonnes of material being mined annually. The test pit material will be processed through cyclones on-site for deposition testwork.

An aerial view of a large land Description automatically generated

Figure 5: Dry mining plant feed stockpiled without any crushing or grinding

A large dirt pit with a pond Description automatically generated with medium confidence

Figure 6: Pilot Phase Water Storage Pond almost at capacity with rehabilitation demonstration pits in background

The main pit will be backfilled with dry material, while material from hydraulic mining will be used to fill rehabilitation pits as part of the rehabilitation phase.

A temporary water storage pond has been constructed and sealed using natural clay from excavated material, minimising the use of conventional plastic lining. The pond is being filled via eight boreholes delivering water to site and is nearing its capacity of six million litres. Water from the storage pond will initially be used for the hydraulic mining stage. 

An aerial view of a construction site Description automatically generated

Figure 7: Pilot Phase Site end of July 2024

Background to the Pilot Phase

The Pilot Phase is a critical part of Kasiya’s optimisation study; empirical data generated from the Pilot Phase will determine optimal project excavation, material handling, processing, backfilling and rehabilitation approaches. The Pilot Phase is being undertaken on a 9.9-hectare site and includes the following activities:

1.    Test Pit: A test pit of 120m by 110m excavated to a depth of 20m, allowing optimisation of hydraulic and dry mining excavation methods.

2.    Stockpiles: The excavated material will be temporarily stored in 4 stockpiles, namely all dry mining material, wet slimes (in a pond) and two sizes of sand fractions from the hydraulic mining.

3.    Backfilling and Grading: The material will be placed back into the pit, and all areas will be graded.

4.    Rehabilitation Demonstration: Sovereign will construct eight small rehabilitation demonstration pits covering a combined area of 100m by 130m. These will be used for water storage, excavated material storage, and demonstration of multiple rehabilitation approaches.

5.    Temporary Laydown Areas: Four areas will be used as temporary laydown areas, offices, and associated infrastructure.

6.    Communication: The Pilot Phase will be an educational opportunity for Project stakeholders. Sovereign will undertake a series of stakeholder visits and consultations for this purpose.

Sovereign’s objective is to restore land after mining to conditions that achieve the same or better agricultural yields than existing land uses and crop yields. The Pilot Phase will demonstrate to local communities the successful rehabilitation of land for agricultural use post-mining; land rehabilitation will form an integral component of the ongoing optimisation study. Results will also allow Sovereign to determine optimal excavation and backfill approaches, providing critical information for the upcoming Definitive Feasibility Study.

ENQUIRIES

Frank Eagar (South Africa/Malawi)
Managing Director

+27 21 065 1890

Sam Cordin (Perth)
Business Development

+61(8) 9322 6322

Sapan Ghai (London)
CCO

+44 207 478 3900

 

 

Nominated Adviser on AIM and Joint Broker

 

SP Angel Corporate Finance LLP

+44 20 3470 0470

Ewan Leggat

Charlie Bouverat

 

 

Joint Brokers

 

Stifel

+44 20 7710 7600

Varun Talwar

 

Ashton Clanfield

 

 

 

Berenberg

+44 20 3207 7800

Matthew Armitt

 

Jennifer Lee

 

 

 

Buchanan

+ 44 20 7466 5000

Competent Person Statement

The information in this announcement that relates to the Mineral Resource Estimate is extracted from an announcement dated 5 April 2023 entitled ‘Kasiya Indicated Resource Increased by over 80%’ which is available to view at www.sovereignmetals.com.au and is based on, and fairly represents information compiled by Mr Richard Stockwell, a Competent Person, who is a fellow of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (AIG). Mr Stockwell is a principal of Placer Consulting Pty Ltd, an independent consulting company. Sovereign confirms that a) it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in the original announcement; b) all material assumptions included in the original announcement continue to apply and have not materially changed; and c) the form and context in which the relevant Competent Persons’ findings are presented in this announcement have not been materially changed from the original announcement.

Kasiya Total Indicated + Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate at 0.7% rutile cut-off grade

Classification

Resource
(Mt)

Rutile Grade
(%)

Contained Rutile
(Mt)

Graphite Grade (TGC) (%)

Contained Graphite
(Mt)

Indicated

 1,200

1.0%

12.2

1.5%

18.0

Inferred

 609

0.9%

5.7

1.1%

6.5

Total

 1,809

1.0%

17.9

1.4%

24.4

Forward Looking Statement

This release may include forward-looking statements, which may be identified by words such as “expects”, “anticipates”, “believes”, “projects”, “plans”, and similar expressions. These forward-looking statements are based on Sovereign’s expectations and beliefs concerning future events. Forward looking statements are necessarily subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are outside the control of Sovereign, which could cause actual results to differ materially from such statements. There can be no assurance that forward-looking statements will prove to be correct. Sovereign makes no undertaking to subsequently update or revise the forward-looking statements made in this release, to reflect the circumstances or events after the date of that release.

The information contained within this announcement is deemed by the Company to constitute inside information as stipulated under the Market Abuse Regulations (EU) No. 596/2014 as it forms part of UK domestic law by virtue of the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 (‘MAR’). Upon the publication of this announcement via Regulatory Information Service (‘RIS’), this inside information is now considered to be in the public domain.

 

#SVML Sovereign Metals LTD – Pilot Phase Site Construction on Schedule

  

Kasiya’s pilot mining and land rehabilitation program is progressing with site establishment on schedule

·   

Mobile fleet is currently constructing the test pit, water storage pond and ore stockpile

·   

Free-dig nature of soft saprolite ore confirms the ease of mining with no drilling or blasting required

·   

Eight boreholes have been commissioned and are ready to supply the water storage pond

·   

Key contractors and consultants across major disciplines have now been appointed

·   

Empirical data generated from the Pilot Phase will assist in determining optimal project excavation, material handling, processing, backfilling and rehabilitation approaches

 

Classification 2.2: This announcement includes Inside Information

Figure 1: Pilot Phase site June 2024

Sovereign Metals Limited (ASX:SVM; AIM:SVML) (the Company or Sovereign) is pleased to announce that pilot site construction for the ongoing Pilot Mining and Land Rehabilitation Program (Pilot Phase) at the Kasiya Rutile-Graphite Project (Kasiya or Project) in Malawi is on schedule with groundworks underway.

Managing Director Frank Eagar commented: This Pilot Phase is a step-change for Kasiya and demonstrates our ability to execute in Malawi.  The early works are progressing as planned: on schedule and within budget. We are very pleased with the progress and specifically how the mobile fleet is performing in the soft saprolite ore, confirming our understanding of how simple mining, with no drilling or blasting required, will contribute to low operating costs.”

The construction fleet is on-site with groundwork to excavate the water storage pond and construct the test areas currently underway. Site equipment is currently moving 5,000 cubic metres of earth daily. The fleet consists of four excavators, 20 trucks and a support fleet, including two bulldozers and a motor grader.

An aerial view of a dirt area Description automatically generated

Figure 2: Dry mining stockpile area under construction

A perimeter fence around the 9.9-hectare pilot site has been erected to maintain the necessary health and safety standards. Sovereign’s strategic investor, Rio Tinto, is assisting with establishing health and safety protocols and implementation on a day-to-day basis.

Eight water extraction boreholes have been commissioned and are delivering water to the site, with the filling of the water storage pond to follow. The temporary water storage pond is currently being excavated and will be sealed using natural clay from excavated material. This will minimise the use of conventional plastic lining at the pilot site in accordance with Sovereign’s objectives for a sustainable operation at Kasiya.

 

A aerial view of a construction site Description automatically generated

Figure 3: Pilot Phase fleet and equipment excavating the water storage pond

Key contractors and consultants have been appointed across all major disciplines essential for the Pilot Phase.

·      Multinational engineering and construction company Mota Engil Group has been appointed to perform all excavation required for site establishment, the water storage pond, the test pit, seven rehabilitation pits as per Figure 4, site closure and general rehabilitation of the site. Mota Engil Group operates in 21 countries with 54,000 employees and is ranked among the world’s largest construction companies.

·      South Africa-based consultancy Fraser Alexander (Pty) Ltd has been contracted to complete the hydraulic mining phase.

·      Backfill, storage and tailings management will be assessed by South African residue management solutions consultancy Epoch Resources (Pty) Ltd, which has a 25-year track record, including working for Randgold Resources Plc, Xstrata Plc and Anglo American Platinum Limited.

·      International engineering company DRA Global Limited has been appointed to oversee and provide engineering and design services required during the Pilot Phase.

The Pilot Phase is being undertaken on a 9.9-hectare site and will include the following activities:

1.    Test Pit: A test pit of 120m by 110m will be excavated to a depth of 20m, allowing optimisation of hydraulic and dry mining excavation methods.

2.    Stockpiles: The excavated material will be temporarily stored in 4 stockpiles, namely all dry mining material, wet slimes (in a pond) and two sizes of sand fractions from the hydraulic mining.

3.    Backfilling and Grading: The material will be placed back into the pit, and all areas will be graded.

4.    Rehabilitation Demonstration: Sovereign will construct eight small rehabilitation demonstration pits covering a combined area of 100m by 130m. These will be used for water storage, excavated material storage, and demonstration of multiple rehabilitation approaches.

5.    Temporary Laydown Areas: Four areas will be used as temporary laydown areas, offices, and associated infrastructure.

6.    Communication: The Pilot Phase will be an educational opportunity for Project stakeholders. Sovereign will undertake a series of stakeholder visits and consultations for this purpose.

Sovereign’s objective is to restore land after mining to conditions that achieve the same or better agricultural yields than existing land uses and crop yields. The Pilot Phase will demonstrate to local communities the successful rehabilitation of land for agricultural use post-mining; land rehabilitation will form an integral component of the ongoing optimisation study. Results will also allow Sovereign to determine optimal excavation and backfill approaches, providing critical information for the upcoming Definitive Feasibility Study.

Kasiya is the world’s largest natural rutile deposit and the second-largest flake graphite deposit. Sovereign aims to develop a low-CO2 footprint and sustainable operation to supply highly sought-after natural rutile and natural graphite to the global markets.

A map of a building Description automatically generated

Figure 4: Planned site layout

 

ENQUIRIES

Frank Eagar (South Africa/Malawi)
Managing Director

+61(8) 9322 6322

Sam Cordin (Perth)
+61(8) 9322 6322

Sapan Ghai (London)
+44 207 478 3900

 

Nominated Adviser on AIM and Joint Broker

 

SP Angel Corporate Finance LLP

+44 20 3470 0470

Ewan Leggat

Charlie Bouverat

 

 

Joint Brokers

 

Stifel

+44 20 7710 7600

Varun Talwar

 

Ashton Clanfield

 

 

 

Berenberg

+44 20 3207 7800

Matthew Armitt

 

Jennifer Lee

 

 

 

Buchanan

+ 44 20 7466 5000

#SVML Sovereign Metals Ltd – Kasiya Optimisation Advances to Pilot Phase

Sovereign Metals #SVML – KASIYA OPTIMISATION ADVANCES TO PILOT PHASE

·   

Sovereign to immediately commence a pilot mining and land rehabilitation program (“Pilot Phase”) at Kasiya as part of the ongoing Optimisation Study

·   

Empirical data generated from the Pilot Phase will assist towards determining optimal excavation, material handling, processing, backfilling and rehabilitation approaches

·   

Sovereign will excavate approximately 150,000 bench cubic metres of ore from a test pit over a three-month period using a combination of dry and hydraulic mining techniques

·   

Excavated material will be processed on-site and at Sovereign’s laboratory in Malawi and will also provide additional bulk samples for graphite product qualification

·   

The test pit will be backfilled, and multiple rehabilitation strategies will be implemented to demonstrate successful restoration of agricultural land

·   

Demonstrates strong support for mining projects in Malawi with all required approvals and community permissions for the Pilot Phase obtained within three months

A close up of sand Description automatically generated

Figure 1: Natural concentration of heavy minerals at surface at Kasiya (Source: C12 Consultants)

Managing Director Frank Eagar commented: “Advancing to a Pilot Phase is an important milestone for Kasiya. This covers the full spectrum of engineering and design, logistics, materials handling, water and environmental approvals, stakeholder engagement, livelihood restoration, tailings management and land rehabilitation. The successful permitting is a testament to the strong owner’s team we have assembled. We are progressing Kasiya into a totally new phase of development. The scale and results from this phase will significantly enhance our knowledge base from the previous laboratory-based studies. I want to thank the Malawi Government for an efficient approvals process, demonstrating just how important Kasiya is to all stakeholders.”

Classification 2.2: This announcement includes Inside Information

Sovereign Metals Limited (ASX:SVM; AIM:SVML) (the Company or Sovereign) is pleased to announce that the Company has initiated a Pilot Mining and Land Rehabilitation Program at its Kasiya Rutile-Graphite Project (Kasiya or Project) in Malawi.

The results will allow Sovereign to determine optimal excavation, backfill and land rehabilitation approaches. The Pilot Phase will be a demonstration to local communities of the successful rehabilitation of land for agricultural use post-mining. Results will also provide critical information for the upcoming Definitive Feasibility Study (DFS) and once commenced, it will shorten the time to its completion.

The objectives of the Pilot Phase include:

·    Optimisation of mining methods by construction of a pilot-scale open pit close to the maximum depth of the current reserves at 20m;

·   Scale-up of existing in-country processing capability by installation of commercial scale spirals to produce additional bulk samples for graphite product qualification;

·      Optimising the tailings management and storage designs; and

·      Optimising land rehabilitation, soil restoration and selection of revegetation species.

The commencement of the Pilot Phase follows the receipt within three months of all relevant approvals and permissions from the Malawi Environment Protection Authority (MEPA), National Water Resources Authority (NWRA), the Ministry of Mines, and the local community.

The Pilot Phase will be undertaken on a 9.9-hectare site and will include the following activities:

1.    Test Pit: A test pit of 120m by 110m will be excavated to a depth of 20m, allowing optimisation of hydraulic and dry mining excavation methods.

2.  Stockpiles: The excavated material will be temporarily stored in 4 stockpiles, namely all dry mining material, wet slimes (in a pond) and two sizes of sand fractions from the hydraulic mining.

3.    Backfilling and Grading: The material will be placed back into the pit, and all areas will be graded.

4.  Rehabilitation Demonstration: Sovereign will construct eight small rehabilitation demonstration pits covering a combined area of 100m by 130m. These will be used for water storage, excavated material storage, and demonstration of multiple rehabilitation approaches.

5.    Temporary Laydown Areas: Four areas will be used as temporary laydown areas, offices, and associated infrastructure.

6.    Communication: The Pilot Phase will be an educational opportunity for Project stakeholders. Sovereign will undertake a series of stakeholder visits and consultations for this purpose.

Kasiya is the world’s largest natural rutile deposit and the second-largest flake graphite deposit. Sovereign aims to develop a low-CO2 and sustainable operation to supply highly sought-after natural rutile and graphite to global markets.

Results of the PFS, released in late 2023, demonstrated Kasiya’s potential to become the world’s largest rutile producer at 222kt per annum and one of the world’s largest natural graphite producers (ex-China) at 244kt per annum.

The PFS delivered compelling economics with a post-tax NPV8 of US$1.6 Billion and a post-tax IRR of 28%. This long-life, multi-generational operation generates over US$16 Billion of revenue based on an initial 25-year life-of-mine and delivers an average annual EBITDA of US$415 Million per annum.

Pilot Phase Program Design

Activities have been designed to establish a 9.9-hectare site over the current Ore Reserve defined in the Kasiya PFS, covering a mineralised zone with soil conditions deemed representative of the overall Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE). Over approximately three months, Sovereign will excavate several test pits and collect geological and geotechnical samples. The main pit will be backfilled with dry material, while material from hydraulic mining will be used to fill the remaining pits as part of the rehabilitation phase.

Land rehabilitation will form an integral component of the DFS. Sovereign’s objective is to restore land after mining to conditions that achieve the same or better agricultural yields than existing land uses and crop yields. For this reason, the Company will undertake field-based demonstrations of rehabilitation showcasing drying times, soil recoveries, soil nutrients, growth variants, and including different soil inputs and revegetation methods.

Site Construction

Prior to the establishment of site infrastructure, eight boreholes have been permitted and drilled using a locally appointed drilling contractor. These boreholes will supply water to the site, which will be stored in a temporary water storage pond.

A perimeter fence will be erected around the site to maintain the necessary health and safety standards. Existing roads will be used for access to the site and, if required, improved through grading.

Temporary buildings such as offices and stores will be brought to the site on flatbed lorries and erected. To support pilot mining, two 1MW mobile diesel-powered electricity generators will be installed to provide the electricity required for high-pressure water monitors.

Pilot Mining

The main pit will be excavated using conventional load and haul to 20m depth to develop a sump to test hydraulic mining to the full depth of the current Ore Reserves. The excavated material will be temporarily stored in stockpiles.

On-Site Processing Facility

Material mined from the test pit will be processed on-site and at the Company’s laboratory facility in Lilongwe. As previously announced (Please refer to announcement dated 1 May 2024 entitled “Sovereign to Increase Bulk Sample Preparation Capacity”), as part of the Pilot Phase, a commercial-scale spiral plant will be installed at site in Malawi.

Rutile and graphite concentrate samples generated from the Pilot Phase will be shared with potential off-takers and end-users, and used for further testwork as part of the Company’s graphite commercialisation strategy.

Rehabilitation Phase

This phase will consist of establishing a strong soils baseline, backfilling of the test pit with different soil compositions, rehabilitation tests, revegetation with plants, and the improvement of soil conditions post-mining.

Regular monitoring and evaluation of the rehabilitation activities will be undertaken to assess the progress of vegetation growth and soil stabilisation. Following the conclusion of the rehabilitation, the proposed project site will be returned to farmland.

Figure 2: Site layout

Permitting

Permissions for the Pilot Phase were received following the successful submission of an Environmental and Social Management Plan to MEPA. Sovereign is committed to the responsible development of Kasiya. The Pilot Phase will be undertaken in accordance with Malawian Law and IFC Performance Standards, which will include protecting local communities and the natural environment.

ENQUIRIES

Frank Eagar (South Africa/Malawi)
Managing Director

+61(8) 9322 6322

Sam Cordin (Perth)
+61(8) 9322 6322

Sapan Ghai (London)
+44 207 478 3900

 

 

Nominated Adviser on AIM and Joint Broker

 

SP Angel Corporate Finance LLP

+44 20 3470 0470

Ewan Leggat

Charlie Bouverat

 

 

Joint Brokers

 

Stifel

+44 20 7710 7600

Varun Talwar

 

Ashton Clanfield

 

 

 

Berenberg

+44 20 3207 7800

Matthew Armitt

 

Jennifer Lee

 

 

 

Buchanan

+ 44 20 7466 5000

#SVML Sovereign Metals LTD – Kasiya Pre-Feasibility Study Results

PFS CONFIRMS KASIYA AS A MAJOR CRITICAL MINERALS PROJECT DELIVERING INDUSTRY-LEADING ECONOMIC RETURNS AND SUSTAINABILITY METRICS

ECONOMIC HIGHLIGHTS

US$1,605M

28%

US$415M

After Tax NPV8

After Tax IRR

Ave. Annual EBITDA

 

US$16Bn

US$404/t

US$597M

Total Revenue
(initial modelled 25 years LOM)

Operating Cost
(FOB Nacala per tonne of product)

Capex to 1st Production

PFS HIGHLIGHTS

·    “Market Leader” Position in Two Critical Minerals:

o Positioned to become the world’s largest rutile producer at 222kt per annum for an initial 25 year life-of-mine (LOM)

o Potentially one of the world’s largest natural graphite producers outside of China at 244kt per annum

o Natural rutile facing significant global supply deficit forecast to widen further considerably in the next 5 years1

o Natural graphite market moving into deficit as demand rapidly grows in the lithium-ion battery and electric vehicle (EV) sectors

o Initial Probable Ore Reserves declared of 538Mt, representing conversion of only 30% of the total Mineral Resource

o Substantial production rate and mine life upside exists as the PFS modelling was limited to only 25 years

·    Highly Compelling Cost Profile:  

o Cash operating costs of US$404/t of product will position Kasiya as the lowest cost producer of rutile and graphite globally

o Increased capital to first production from the Expanded Scoping Study, is primarily due to bringing forward capital items previously planned for Stage 2 including a rail spur, full-scale water dam, integrated power and optimised graphite production, as well as generally enhanced engineering and global cost inflation

·    Industry-Redefining Environmental and Social Advantages:

o Extremely low CO2-footprint operation incorporating climate-smart attributes including hydro-mining with renewables power solution

o CO2 emissions expected to be lowest in class versus existing and planned operations and versus alternative synthetic products

o Low-impact operation with mineralisation at surface, zero-strip ratio, low reagent usage, simple process flowsheet and progressive land rehabilitation

·    Strong Support from the Government of Malawi:

o Government of Malawi has applauded the timely investment by Rio Tinto and marked it as a milestone towards realising the country’s aspirations of growing the mining sector as a priority industry

o PFS demonstrates Kasiya’s potential to provide significant socio-economic benefits for Malawi including fiscal returns, job creation, skills transfer and sustainable community development initiatives

o With mining being one of the key pillars for growth under Malawi’s economic development strategy (Agriculture, Tourism, Mining – ATM Policy) and the potential for Kasiya to be a project of national significance, the Government has constituted an Inter-ministerial Project Development Committee to work alongside the Company to assist in the permitting processes  

·    Optimisation with Strategic Investor Rio Tinto to Commence:

o Advancing into an optimisation phase prior to moving to the Definitive Feasibility Study (DFS) with support from the Company’s strategic investor, Rio Tinto

o Formal establishment of the Technical Committee with Rio Tinto  

Managing Director, Dr Julian Stephens commented: The release of the Kasiya PFS marks another important step towards unlocking a major source of two critical minerals required to decarbonise global supply chains and to achieve Net-Zero.

The Project benefits from existing high-quality infrastructure and inherent ESG advantages. Natural rutile has a far lower carbon footprint compared to other titanium feedstocks used in the pigment industry, and natural graphite is a key component in lithium-ion batteries – crucial to de-carbonising the global economy.

The high-quality of work completed and the results of the PFS demonstrates that Kasiya is a globally significant project that has the potential to deliver a valuable long-term source of low-CO2 products and generate substantial economic returns with a forecast average EBITDA of US$415 Million per annum for the initial 25 years modelled. The Project is well positioned to be a large scale, multi-generational asset with significant opportunity for further upside as only 30% of the current mineral resource (MRE) is utilised in the PFS model.

Kasiya’s compelling economics demonstrate the potential for industry-leading returns, even against the backdrop of global cost inflation.

The Company is looking forward to conducting an optimisation review in collaboration with new strategic investor, Rio Tinto and progressing to the Definitive Feasibility Study.”

 

ENQUIRIES

Dr Julian Stephens (Perth)
Managing Director

+61(8) 9322 6322

Sam Cordin (Perth)
+61(8) 9322 6322

Sapan Ghai (London)
+44 207 478 3900

 

Nominated Adviser on AIM and Joint Broker

 

SP Angel Corporate Finance LLP

 

Ewan Leggat

Charlie Bouverat

Harry Davies-Ball

+44 20 3470 0470

 

 

Joint Brokers

 

Berenberg

+44 20 3207 7800

Matthew Armitt

 

Jennifer Lee

 

 

 

Tavistock PR

+44 20 7920 3150

 

To view the announcement in full, please refer to the announcement at http://sovereignmetals.com.au/announcements/.

 

The information contained within this announcement is deemed by the Company to constitute inside information as stipulated under the Market Abuse Regulations (EU) No. 596/2014 as it forms part of UK domestic law by virtue of the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 (‘MAR’). Upon the publication of this announcement via Regulatory Information Service (‘RIS’), this inside information is now considered to be in the public domain.

Source:

 1. TZ Minerals International Pty Ltd (TZMI)

 

KASIYA PFS OUTCOMES

Sovereign Metals Limited (the Company or Sovereign) is pleased to announce the results of the Pre-Feasibility Study (PFS or Study) for the Company’s Kasiya Rutile-Graphite Project (Kasiya or the Project) in Malawi.

The PFS confirmed Kasiya as potentially a major critical minerals project with an extremely low CO2-footprint delivering major volumes of natural rutile and graphite while generating significant economic returns.   

The PFS is an Association for the Advancement of Cost Engineering International (AACEI) Class 3 estimate with an accuracy of -20% and +25%.

Table 1: Key Outcomes

Outcome

 

Unit

Kasiya

NPV8 (real post-tax)

US$

US$1,605M

NPV10 (real post-tax)

US$

US$1,205M

IRR (post-tax)

%

28%

Capital Costs to First Production (Stage 1)

US$

US$597M

Expansion Capital (Stage 2)

US$

US$287M

Plant relocation

US$

US$366M

Operating Costs

US$/t mined

US$8.74

Operating Costs

US$/t product

US$404

Revenue to Cost Ratio

X

2.8

NPV8 / Capital Costs to First Production

X

2.7

Throughput (Average LOM)

Mtpa

21.5

Modelled Life

years

25

Annual Production (Average LOM) – rutile

ktpa

222

Annual Production (Average LOM) – graphite

ktpa

244

Total Revenue (LOM)

US$

US$16,121M

Annual Revenue (Average LOM)

US$

US$645M

Annual EBITDA (Average LOM)

US$/year

US$415M

Payback – from start of production

years

4.3 years

 

LARGE-SCALE, LONG-LIFE AND HIGH-MARGIN OPERATION

Kasiya, located in central Malawi, is the largest natural rutile deposit and second largest flake graphite deposit in the world. Sovereign is aiming to develop a low-CO2 and sustainable operation to supply highly sought-after natural rutile and graphite to global markets.

Kasiya has a geological benefit with both natural graphite and rutile hosted in soft, friable saprolite material at surface that can be mined, beneficiated, and purified with a considerably lower carbon footprint than hard-rock operations or synthetic graphite and synthetic rutile production.

A diagram of a graphite product Description automatically generated

Figure 1: High-level schematic of the planned Kasiya Rutile-Graphite Project

The proposed large-scale operation will process 24 million tonnes of ore per annum to produce approximately 245kt of natural rutile and 288kt of natural graphite per annum once at steady state.

The rutile-graphite rich mineralisation will be extracted from surface utilising cost-effective hydro-mining to depths averaging 15m. Ore is transported as slurry via a pumping network to a Wet Concentration Plant (WCP) where a low-energy requirement, chemical-free process produces a Heavy Mineral Concentrate (HMC). The HMC is transferred to the dry Mineral Separation Plant (MSP) where premium quality rutile (+95% TiO2) is produced via electrostatic and magnetic separation.

Graphite rich concentrate is collected from the gravity spirals and processed in a separate graphite flotation plant, producing a high purity, high crystallinity and high value coarse-flake graphite product.

The Project has excellent surrounding infrastructure including sealed roads, a high-quality rail line connecting to the deep-water port of Nacala on the Indian Ocean and hydro-sourced grid power. For the duration of the operation, rutile and graphite products will be railed directly from a purpose-built rail dry port at the mine site eastward via the Nacala Logistics Corridor (NLC) to the port of Nacala.

Based on the build-out strategy, the operation will commence in the southern section of the Ore Reserve with a 12Mtpa throughput plant which will be expanded from Year 6 to increase the throughput to 24Mtpa. As the southern mineralisation is exhausted, a new plant will be constructed in the north and the second stage WCP moved in order to continue to support 24Mtpa throughput.

CRITICAL RAW MATERIALS

Both rutile and graphite are critical to the world economy as well as crucial to decarbonisation solutions required to meet “Net-Zero” and other targets set by policymakers. Titanium and natural graphite have been classified as critical raw materials by the US and EU due to a combination of their scarceness and China-controlled supply chains.

Current sources of natural rutile are in decline as several operations’ reserves are depleting concurrently with declining ore grades. These include Sierra Rutile’s (SRL) Mine Area 1 in Sierra Leone and Base Resources’ Kwale operations in Kenya.

Global rutile supply is projected to decline sharply beyond 2023, following the scheduled closures of Base Resource’s Kwale and SRL operations unless mine life extension is approved (Source: TZ Minerals International Pty Ltd (TZMI). There are limited new deposits forecast to come online, and hence supply of natural rutile is likely to remain in structural deficit for the long term, even with Kasiya at full production.

A graph of a mountain Description automatically generated

Figure 2: Previous and forecast global natural rutile supply 2018-2033
*Supply profile only reflects existing operations
(source: TZMI)

Demand for high quality flake graphite and natural rutile is growing due to global decarbonisation requirements and current and future predicted supply deficits. Per Benchmark Mineral Intelligence, the demand for anodes grew by 46% in 2022 compared to only 14% growth in natural flake graphite supply.

Figure 3: Graphite demand / supply showing market deficit beginning 2024E

Source: Macquarie Research (March 2023)

LOW-COST OPERATION

Kasiya’s low operating costs are achieved through deposit size and grade, zero strip ratio from surface, location and excellent existing operational infrastructure. Kasiya is strategically located in close proximity to Malawi’s capital city Lilongwe, providing access to a skilled workforce and industrial services.

Products will be exported to global markets via the deep water port of Nacala along the existing Nacala Logistics Rail Corridor (NLC). This existing infrastructure provides significant capital cost savings for Kasiya compared to many other undeveloped minerals projects.

Kasiya has an average life-of-mine FOB (Nacala) operating cost of US$404 per tonne of product produced (rutile plus graphite).

One of the highest Revenue : Cost of Sales Ratios in the Mineral Sands Industry

The revenue-to-cash cost ratio of 2.8x positions Kasiya in the first quartile compared to other undeveloped mineral sands operations. The production of high value natural rutile and graphite delivers strong cashflows with a cash margin of over 64% for the life of the operation.

The Study has applied conservative pricing assumptions for both products which still results in a strong position on the revenue to cost ratio metric. This supports the robustness of the Kasiya operation and its strong profitability during different pricing environments and the revenue stability of two different products with different demand drivers.

 A graph of different colored rectangular shapes Description automatically generated with medium confidence

Figure 4: Revenue to cost ratio of Kasiya and other selected mineral sands projects

Lowest Cost Flake Graphite Project in the World

Graphite is produced at Kasiya via obtaining a graphite rich concentrate from the gravity spirals as part of the rutile processing. The graphite rich concentrate is then processed in a separate standard graphite flotation plant, producing a high purity, high crystallinity and high value coarse-flake graphite product.

On an incremental cost basis reflecting graphite production as a co-product to primary rutile production, the operating cost is US$182 per tonne of graphite produced (FOB Nacala).

 A graph of a graph Description automatically generated

Figure 5: Actual and forecast graphite production (non-Chinese)

 

LOW CO2 ADVANTAGE

Kasiya has the potential to provide two products that both have very favourable low carbon in-use advantages. Benchmark Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) studies for natural rutile and natural graphite produced from Kasiya* have the potential for a substantially reduced carbon footprint compared to other titanium feedstocks and natural graphite products in the market.

Natural rutile (~95% TiO2) is the cleanest, purest natural mineral form of TiO2 with the other major source being ilmenite (~50% TiO2). The genuine scarcity of natural rutile prompted the titanium industry to develop upgraded titanium feedstock products from ilmenite that can be used as substitutes for natural rutile (i.e. synthetic rutile and titania slag).

Two energy and carbon intensive processes are used by major market participants to produce the upgraded synthetic rutile and titania slag. Both methods use ilmenite (~FeTiO3) as the raw feedstock and are essentially processes for the removal of iron oxide. The downstream pigment production process relies heavily on the use of these upgraded titanium feedstocks, each having an associated substantial environmental impact.

A screenshot of a computer screen Description automatically generated

Figure 6: Natural rutile versus synthetic rutile and titania slag flowchart

Natural rutile produced at Kasiya has a fraction of the GWP of the alternative feedstocks. The Global Warming Potential (GWP) for natural rutile concentrate from Kasiya (0.1 t CO2e per tonne) is significantly lower than producing titania slag in South Africa (2.0 t CO2e per tonne) and producing synthetic rutile via the Becher process in Australia (3.3 t CO2e per tonne).

The Scope 1 and 2 emissions comparing the carbon footprint of these three production routes are shown in Figure 6. The higher GWP for synthetic rutile is mainly due to the use of coal and other reagents for the upgrading of lower grade ilmenite to the final synthetic rutile feedstock product.

* LCA conducted on inputs from the Expanded Scoping Study released July 2022.

 

Chart Description automatically generated

Figure 7:  GWP impact of natural rutile production from Kasiya as a titanium feedstock vs. alternatives
(Source: Minviro)

Kasiya has the lowest GWP compared with currently known and planned future natural graphite projects:

·      Up to 60% lower than currently reported GWP of graphite producers and developers, including suppliers to Tesla Inc.

·      3x less polluting than proposed Tanzanian natural graphite production from hard rock sources

·      6x less polluting than current Chinese natural graphite production which accounts for up to 80% of current global graphite supply

Figure 8: Global Warming Potential per tonne of graphite product (CO2e/t)

(Note: All figures are cradle-to-gate except for Syrah Resources which includes transportation to the port of Nacala; transportation of Kasiya’s graphite to the port of Nacala would add an estimated incremental 0.04CO2e to its GWP)

Industry’s interaction with supply chain participants indicates the progression towards higher proportions of natural graphite used in battery anodes will be supported by its lower cost and superior environmental credentials. The environmental footprint of EVs will become an increasingly important market consideration as EV penetration accelerates, noting that synthetic graphite has a carbon footprint orders of magnitude higher than flake graphite because it is made from needle coke produced from oil and coal refining via energy intensive processes.

Leading EV producer Tesla Inc.’s (Tesla) “Master Plan 3” outlines its proposed path to reach a sustainable global energy economy through end-use electrification and sustainable electricity generation and storage.  In the plan, Tesla suggests that the world would need to produce 10.5Mt of graphite per year and estimates US$104 Billion of new graphite mining investment is required to achieve its target (source: Tesla Master Plan 3 (April 2023)).

STRONG GOVERNMENT SUPPORT

The Malawian government identifies mining as one of the sectors that could potentially generate economic growth for the country. The country has several significant mineral resources that could be sustainably mined to contribute to Malawi’s economic goals.

Kasiya has the potential to deliver significant social and economic benefits for Malawi including fiscal returns, job creation, skills transfer and sustainable community development initiatives.

The Government of Malawi strongly supports Sovereign and its development of the Kasiya project. Malawi’s Minister of Mines and Minerals, The Honourable Monica Chang’anamuno, recently publicly applauded the timely investment by Rio Tinto and marked it as a milestone towards realising the country’s aspirations of growing the mining industry as promoted in the Malawi Vision 2063, which isolates mining as a priority industry.

With mining being one of the key pillars for growth under Malawi’s economic development strategy (Agriculture, Tourism, Mining – ATM Policy) and the potential for Kasiya to be a project of national significance, the Government has constituted an Inter-ministerial Project Development Committee to work alongside the Company to assist in the permitting processes.

INVESTMENT BY RIO TINTO

In July 2023, Rio Tinto made an investment in Sovereign resulting in an initial 15% shareholding and options expiring within 12 months of initial investment to increase their position to 19.99%. Under the Investment Agreement, Rio Tinto will provide assistance and advice on technical and marketing aspects of Kasiya including with respect to Sovereign’s graphite co-product, with a primary focus on spherical purified graphite for the lithium-ion battery anode market.   

The Company is planning to commence optimisation phase prior to advancing to the DFS. Sovereign is soon to establish a Technical Committee and commence the working relationship with Rio Tinto after the publication of this Study.

DISCLOSURES, DISCLAIMERS, MODIFYING FACTORS & SOURCES

 

DISCLOSURES & DISCLAIMERS

 

Competent Person Statements

The information in this announcement that relates to Production Targets and Ore Reserves is based on and fairly represents information provided by Mr Ross Cheyne, a Competent Person, who is a Fellow Member of The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. Mr Cheyne is employed by Orelogy Consulting Pty Ltd, an independent consulting company. Mr Cheyne has sufficient experience, which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration, and to the activity he is undertaking, to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Mr Cheyne consents to the inclusion in the Announcement of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.

The information in this announcement that relates to Processing, Infrastructure and Capital and Operating Costs is based on and fairly represents information compiled or reviewed by Mr Tomasz Tomicki, a Competent Person, who is a Fellow Member of The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. Mr Tomicki is employed by DRA Pacific Pty Ltd, an independent consulting company. Mr Tomicki has sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activities undertaken. Mr Tomicki, consents to the inclusion in the Announcement of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.

The information in this announcement that relates to Metallurgy – rutile is based on and fairly represents information compiled or reviewed by Mr Tomasz Tomicki, a Competent Person, who is a Fellow Member of The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. Mr Tomicki is employed by DRA Pacific Pty Ltd, an independent consulting company. Mr Tomicki has sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activities undertaken. Mr Tomicki, consents to the inclusion in the Announcement of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.

The information in this announcement that relates to Metallurgy – graphite is based on and fairly represents information compiled or reviewed by Mr John Fleay, a Competent Person, who is a Fellow Member of The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. Mr Fleay is employed by DRA Pacific Pty Ltd, an independent consulting company. Mr Fleay has sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activities undertaken. Mr Fleay, consents to the inclusion in the Announcement of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.

The information in this announcement that relates to the Mineral Resource Estimate is extracted from the announcement entitled ‘Kasiya Indicated Resource Increased by over 80%’ dated 5 April 2023 and is based on, and fairly represents information compiled by Mr Richard Stockwell, a Competent Person, who is a fellow of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (AIG). Mr Stockwell is a principal of Placer Consulting Pty Ltd, an independent consulting company. The original announcement is available to view on www.sovereignmetals.com.au. Sovereign confirms that a) it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in the original announcement; b) all material assumptions included in the original announcement continue to apply and have not materially changed; and c) the form and context in which the relevant Competent Persons’ findings are presented in this announcement have not been materially changed from the original announcement.

Forward Looking Statement

 

This release may include forward-looking statements, which may be identified by words such as “expects”, “anticipates”, “believes”, “projects”, “plans”, and similar expressions. These forward-looking statements are based on Sovereign’s expectations and beliefs concerning future events. Forward looking statements are necessarily subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are outside the control of Sovereign, which could cause actual results to differ materially from such statements. There can be no assurance that forward-looking statements will prove to be correct. Sovereign makes no undertaking to subsequently update or revise the forward-looking statements made in this release, to reflect the circumstances or events after the date of that release.

 

Qualified Person

 

Information disclosed in this announcement has been reviewed by Dr Julian Stephens (B.Sc (Hons), PhD, MAIG), Managing Director, a Qualified Person for the purposes of the AIM Rules for Companies.

 

SUMMARY OF MATERIAL ASSUMPTIONS

Material assumptions used in the estimation of the production target and associated financial information are set out in the following table.

Table 2: Assumptions 

Assumption

Input

Maximum accuracy variation – Capital costs 

-20%/+25%

Maximum accuracy variation – Operating costs

-20%/+25%

Minimum LoM

25 years

Annual average throughput (tonnes) – Stage 1

12,000,000

Annual average throughput (tonnes) – Stage 2

24,000,000

Annual throughput (tonnes) – LoM average

21,600,000

Head grade – rutile

1.03%

Recovery – rutile

100%

Product grade (TiO2) – rutile

96%

Head grade – graphite

1.66%

Recovery – graphite

67.5%

Product grade (TGC) – graphite

96%

Annual production (average LoM) – rutile (tonnes)

222,000

Annual production (average LoM) – graphite (tonnes)

244,000

USD:AUD

0.67

USD:MWK

0.0010

USD:ZAR

0.0549

Sales Price – rutile (average LoM)

US$1,484/t

Sales Price – graphite (average LoM)

US$1,290/t

Government Royalty

5% of gross revenue

Vendor Royalty

2% of gross profit

Community Development Fund

0.45% of gross revenue

Stage 1 Capital

US$572m

Stage 2 Capital (expansion to 24Mtpa)

US$287m

Plant Relocation

US$366m

Sustaining Capital

US$470m

Operating Costs including royalties (LoM) – FOB Nacala

US$404/t

Corporate Tax Rate

30%

Rent Resource Tax (RRT)

15% after-profits

Discount Rate

8%

 

ORE RESERVE STATEMENT

 

Orelogy Consulting Pty Ltd (Orelogy) was responsible for the mine planning component of the PFS for Kasiya. As such Orelogy have developed an Ore Reserve estimate for Kasiya in accordance with the guidelines of the JORC Code 2012.

The Kasiya MRE released by Sovereign in on 5 April 2023 was used as the basis for the PFS Ore Reserve estimate. Mineral Resources were converted to Ore Reserves in line with the material classifications which reflect the level of confidence within the resource estimate. The Ore Reserve reflects that portion of the Mineral Resource which can be economically extracted by open pits utilising a combination of hydro mining and bulldozer methodologies. The Ore Reserve considers the modifying factors and other parameters detailed in the relevant sections of the PFS report, including but not limited to the mining, metallurgical, social, environmental, approvals, tenure, statutory and financial aspects of the project.

In line with the JORC 2012 guidelines, the Kasiya Probable Ore Reserve is based on Indicated classified Mineral Resources. There is no Measured classified Mineral Resource at Kasiya and consequently no Proved Ore Reserve.

The reported MRE is inclusive of the Ore Reserve.

The Ore Reserve includes an allowance for mining dilution and ore loss on the basis that all material within the shell is classified and extracted as ore.

The open pit geometries developed for the purposes of mine planning, and which define the subsequent Ore Reserve, are based on Whittle pit shells edited to comply with practical mining requirements and identified exclusion zones.

The information that relates to Ore Reserves was compiled by Mr Ross Cheyne of Orelogy who takes overall responsibility for the Ore Reserve as Competent Person (see Competent Persons Statement above). Mr Cheyne is a Fellow of The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy and has sufficient experience, which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration, and to the activity he is undertaking, to qualify as Competent Person in terms of the JORC (2012 Edition).

A site visit was undertaken by Mr Ryan Locke in, a Principal Consultant with Orelogy, as a nominated representative of the Competent Person.

The Ore Reserve estimate is summarised in Table 3 below, along with the associated cut-off grade used to define the shell.

Table 3:  Ore Reserve for the Kasiya Deposit as of September 2023

Classification

Tonnes
(Mt)

Rutile Grade
(%)

Contained Rutile
(Mt)

Graphite Grade (TGC) (%)

Contained Graphite
(Mt)

Proved

Probable

538

1.03%

5.5

1.66%

8.9

Total

 538

1.03%

5.5

1.66%

8.9

Pit Optimisation

An open pit optimisation utilising Whittle™ software was carried out on the Kasiya deposit using Indicated Mineral Resources only (in line with the JORC 2012 guidelines). The latest parameters available were used to determine the economic extent of the open pit excavation. The process plant production parameters were supplied by Sovereign with an initial rate of 12Mtpa and a ramp up in production from years 5 – 7 to annual rate of 24Mtpa.

 

The intention to hydro-mine the majority of the defined Ore Reserve means that there is no ability to selectively mine and all material will be extracted and sent as plant feed. Therefore, all material within the “shell” will be extracted and fed to the plant as ore and any interstitial waste and/or sub-economic grade material will be likewise treated as diluent material. However, due to the relatively homogenous and continuous nature the orebody, the quantities of this material will be relatively small and therefore a simple 5% dilution was applied within the Whittle™ tool.

For the production schedule on which the Ore Reserve is based all material within the shell was treated as “ore” to ensure the appropriate dilution was captured.

Mineable Pit Geometries

Based on the cut-off grades applied the mining areas was further interrogated to determine the potential recoverable mining inventory. The interrogation process applied the following constraints to determine the bulk mining boundaries:

·      A minimum depth of 5m for the hydro mining method.

·      Removal of any small, isolated pits.

·      Pit extents limited to mineable areas and to remain outside of identified exclusion areas wherever reasonably possible. Sovereign identified all local village areas and areas of cultural or environmental significance within the potential mining envelope that should not be disturbed during the mining phase of the Project.

MODIFYING FACTORS

The Modifying Factors included in the JORC Code (2012) have been assessed as part of the Pre-Feasibility Study, including mining, processing, metallurgical, infrastructure, economic, marketing, legal, environmental, social and government factors. The Company has received advice from appropriate experts when assessing each Modifying Factor.

A summary assessment of each relevant Modifying Factor is provided below.

Mining – refer to section entitled ‘Mining’ in the full Announcement at http://sovereignmetals.com.au/announcements/.

The Company engaged independent consultants, Orelogy and Fraser Alexander to carry out the pit optimisations, mine design, scheduling, mining cost estimation and Ore Reserves for the Study. The proposed mining method is hydro mining with minor bulldozer assistance. This is considered appropriate for this style of shallow, soft and friable saprolite-hosted rutile and graphite mineralisation. This methodology is used across numerous mineral sands operations, particularly in Africa, and is well suited for this style of mineralisation.

Rutile

The Company completed bulk rutile testwork programs at the globally recognised AML in Perth, Australia. The latest program was supervised by Sovereign’s Head of Development, Paul Marcos. Mr Marcos is a metallurgist and process engineer and a mineral sands industry veteran. Bulk test-work programs have confirmed premium grade rutile can be produced via a simple and conventional process flow sheet.

Processing engineering was completed by DRA Global who developed the process plant design and associated cost estimate for the Study. An average product grade of 96% TiO2 and 100% recovery to product factor has been applied.

Graphite

The Company has conducted graphite testwork across ALS Laboratory in Perth and SGS Lakefield in Canada. Veteran graphite metallurgist Oliver Peters, MSc, P.Eng., MBA (Consulting Metallurgist for SGS and Principal Metallurgist of Metpro Management Inc.) was engaged to supervise and consult on the testwork programs. Mr Peters has over 25 years’ experience in metallurgy on graphite and other commodities. He has operated numerous graphite pilot plants and commissioned a number of full-scale processing facilities.

DRA’s Senior Engineer, Stewart Calder and Manager Metallurgy, John Fleay supervised and advised on sample selection, testwork scope and results from the latest testwork programs. Both consultants are considered to have the appropriate capabilities and similarities with the material and the early stage of the project.

Processing engineering was completed by DRA Global who developed the process plant design and associated cost estimates for the PFS. Overall average graphite recovery applied in the model was 67.5%.  Gravity recovery ranges between 73.6% to 86.2%, averaging 77.9% and flotation plant recovery ranges between 89.2% and 96.1%, averaging 91.4%. Total Graphite (TGC) recovery average is 72.5%. Overall concentrate grades average 96% C(t) with over 57% of the graphite flake product being larger than 180µm.

Rutile & Graphite

It is acknowledged that laboratory scale test-work will not always represent actual results achieved from a production plant in terms of grade, chemistry, sizing and recovery. Further test-work will be required to gain additional confidence on specifications and recoveries that will be achieved at full-scale production.

Overall, the process flow-sheet is conventional for both rutile and graphite with no novel features or equipment incorporated.

Infrastructure – refer to sections entitled ‘Infrastructure’, and ‘Transport and  Logistics’ in the full Announcement at http://sovereignmetals.com.au/announcements/.

Kasiya is located approximately 40km northwest of Lilongwe, Malawi’s capital, and boasts excellent access to services and infrastructure. The proximity to Lilongwe gives the project a number of benefits, including access to a large pool of professionals and skilled tradespeople, as well as industrial services.

The Company appointed JCM to design a preliminary IPP solution for Kasiya. JCM is a Canada-headquartered IPP which develops, constructs, owns and operates renewable energy and storage projects in emerging markets across the globe. JCM provided an estimated, levelized cost of energy (LOCE) on a Power Purchase Agreement (PPA).

Logistics cost estimates, including rail and port infrastructure and handling, were provided by Thelo DB, Nacala Logistics and Grindrod based on market data, suppliers’ quotations, industry databases, industry contacts and consultants’ existing knowledge of southern African transport infrastructure and freight markets. All consultants are independent with substantial experience in the management of transport logistics studies in southern Africa.

Marketing – refer to sections entitled ‘Marketing Strategy’ in the full Announcement at http://sovereignmetals.com.au/announcements/.

Rutile

The Company engaged market leading TZMI to provide a bespoke marketing report to support the Study. TZMI is a global, independent consulting and publishing company specialising in technical, strategic and commercial analyses of the opaque (non-terminal market) mineral, chemical and metal sectors.

TZMI’s assessment has confirmed that, based upon their high-level view on global demand and supply forecasts for natural rutile, and with reference to the specific attributes of Kasiya, there is a reasonable expectation that the product will be able to be sold into existing and future rutile markets.

Given the premium specifications of Kasiya’s natural rutile, the product should be suitable for all major natural end-use markets including TiO2 pigment feedstock, titanium metal and welding sectors.

In July 2023, Rio Tinto made an investment in Sovereign resulting in an initial 15% shareholding and options expiring within 12 months of initial investment to increase their position to 19.99%. Under the Investment Agreement, Rio Tinto will provide assistance and advice on technical and marketing aspects of Kasiya. Also, included under the Investment Agreement, Rio Tinto has the option to become the operator of Kasiya on commercial arm’s-length terms.

In the event, Rio Tinto elect to be the operator of the Project and for so long as Rio Tinto remain the operator, Rio Tinto shall have exclusive marketing rights to market 40% of the annual production of all products from the Project as identified in the DFS on arm’s-length terms.

Rio Tinto’s option over operatorship and 40% marketing rights lapse if not exercised by the earlier of (i) 90 days after the Company announces its DFS results or 180 days after the announcement of the DFS if Rio Tinto’s advises it needs additional time to consider the exercise of the Rio Tinto’s Option or (ii) Rio Tinto ceasing to hold voting power in the Company of at least 10%.

Graphite

The Company engaged Fastmarkets, a specialist international publisher and information provider for the global steel, non-ferrous and industrial minerals markets, to prepare a marketing report for graphite.

Fastmarkets’ assessment has confirmed that based upon their high-level view on global demand and supply forecasts for natural flake graphite, and with reference to the specific attributes of Sovereign’s projects, there is a reasonable expectation that the product from Sovereign’s projects will be able to be sold into existing and future graphite markets. Given the extremely low-cost profile and high-quality product, it is expected that output from Kasiya will be able to fill new demand or substitute existing lower quality / higher cost supply.

Project considerations taken by Fastmarkets in forming an opinion about the marketability of product include:

–          Low capital costs (incremental)

–          Low operating costs

–          High quality concentrate specifications

Industry participants confirm that the highest value graphite concentrates remain the large, jumbo and super-jumbo flake fractions, primarily used in industrial applications such as refractories, foundries and expandable products. These sectors currently make up the significant majority of total global natural flake graphite market by value.

Fastmarkets have formed their opinion based solely upon project information provided by Sovereign Metals to Fastmarkets and have not conducted any independent analysis or due diligence on the information provided.

As noted above, Rio Tinto recently made an investment in Sovereign. The Company and Rio Tinto will work together to qualify Kasiya’s graphite product with a particular focus on supplying the spherical purified graphite segment of the lithium-ion battery anode market. Rio Tinto has set up a battery materials business in 2021, including its recently announced plans to set up a battery testing plant in Melbourne, Australia.

Economic – also refer to sections entitled ‘Cost Estimations’ and ‘Financial & Economic Analysis’ in the full Announcement at http://sovereignmetals.com.au/announcements/.

Capital estimates for the procress plant have been prepared by DRA global, together with input from the Company and other contributing consultants using combinations of cost estimates from suppliers, historical data, benchmarks and other independent sources. The accuracy of the initial capital cost estimate for the Project is ±20%.

Capital costs include the cost of all services, direct costs, contractor indirects, EPCM expenses, non-process infrastructure, sustaining capital and other facilities used for the mine. Capital costs make provision for mitigation expenses and mine closure and environmental costs.

Working capital requirements (including contingency) for plant commissioning and full ramp-up have been included in the headline capital estimate reported under construction, owner’s and start-up costs.

Mining costs have been estimated by Fraser Alexander, a regional leader in hydro-mining and materials handling. Mining costs have been built up from first principles based on equipment, vendor, and contractor quotations, local unit cost rates, and benchmarked costs.

Labor costs have been developed based on a first-principles build-up of staffing requirements with labour rates benchmarked in Malawi and expatriate rates benchmarked for professionals from South Africa and other jurisdictions.

A Government royalty of 5% (applied to revenue) and a vendor profit share of 2% (applied to gross profit) has been included in all project economics. A 0.45% royalty (applied to revenue) has been applied for the community development fund.

Rehabilitation and mine closure costs are included within the reported operating cost and sustaining capital figures.

A detailed financial model and discounted cash flow (DCF) analysis has been prepared by the Company in order to demonstrate the economic viability of the Project. The financial model and DCF were modelled with conservative inputs to provide management with a baseline valuation of the Project.

The DCF analysis demonstrated compelling economics of the prospective Project, with an NPV (ungeared, after-tax, at an 8% discount rate) of US$1,605 million,  and an (ungeared) IRR of 28%.

Sensitivity analysis was performed on all key assumptions used. The robust project economics insulate the Kasiya Project from variation in market pricing, capital expense, or operating expenses. With a rutile and graphite concentrate price 30% lower than the PFS prices the Project still displays a positive NPV (ungeared, after-tax, 8% discount rate) of US$636 million and IRR of 17%.

Payback period for the Project is 4.3 years from the start of production. The payback period is based on free-cash flow, after taxes.

Sovereign estimates the total capital cost to construct the mine to be US$597m (which includes a contingency of 17% of direct and indirect costs).

Key parameters are disclosed in the body of the announcement, and include:

–          Life of Mine: 25 years

–          Discount rate: 8%

–          Tax rate: 30%

–          Resource Rent Tax (RRT) of 15% after tax profit

–          Royalty rate: 5% royalty (Government), 2% of gross profit (Original Project Vendor) and 0.45% Community Development Fund.

–          Pricing:  Rutile average price of US$1,484 per tonne and Graphite average basket price of US$1,290 per tonne

The financial model has been prepared internally by the Company using inputs from the various expert consultants and has been reviewed by BDO Australia – Perth, an independent leading accountancy, tax and advisory services firm to validate the functionality and accuracy of the model.

The Company engaged the services of advisory firm, Argonaut PCF Limited (Argonaut), with regards to project economics. Argonaut is a financial advisory firm which specialises in multiple sectors, including metals and oil & gas. Argonaut is well regarded as a specialist capital markets service provider and has raised project development funding for companies across a range of commodities including the industrial and speciality minerals sector. Following the assessment of a number of key criteria, Argonaut has confirmed that, on the basis that a DFS arrives at a result that is not materially negatively different than the PFS as noted above, all in-country government and regulatory approvals are received, commercial offtake agreements are in place for the majority of rutile and graphite production for at least the first five years of mine life, and that there has not been any material adverse change in financial condition, results of operations, business or prospects of the Company/or political and business environment in Malawi and/or financial or capital markets in general, Sovereign should be able to raise sufficient funding to develop the Project.

In July 2023, Rio Tinto made an investment in Sovereign resulting in an initial 15% shareholding and options expiring within 12 months of initial investment to increase their position to 19.99%. Under the Investment Agreement, is has been agreed with Rio Tinto that if Sovereign is raising debt finance for the development of the Project, Sovereign and Rio Tinto will negotiate, in good faith, financing arrangements in order to put in place an acceptable mine construction funding package.

Since initial exploration of the Kasiya Project in November 2019, the Company has completed extensive drilling, sampling, metallurgical test-work, geological modelling and defined an Indicated and Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate. Over this period, with these key milestones being attained and the Project de-risked, the Company’s market capitalisation has increased from approximately A$18m to over A$236m. As the Project continues to achieve key milestones, which can also be significant de-risking events, the Company’s share price could be anticipated to increase.

The Company is debt free and is in a strong financial position, with approximately A$45m cash on hand (31 August 2023). The current financial position means the Company is soundly funded to continue into a DFS phase to further develop the Project.

In July and August 2023, Rio Tinto invested $40.6m to become a strategic investor of the Company. The investment proceeds will be used to advance Kasiya and represents a significant step towards unlocking the Project for a major new supply of low-CO2-footprint natural rutile and flake graphite. Under the Investment Agreement, Rio Tinto will provide assistance and advice on technical and marketing aspects of Kasiya including with respect to Sovereign’s graphite co-product, with a primary focus on spherical purified graphite for the lithium-ion battery anode market. 

The Company’s shares are listed on the ASX and AIM which are premier markets for growth companies and provides increased access to capital from institutional and retailed investors in Australia and the UK.

Sovereign has an experienced and high-quality Board and management team comprising highly respected resource executives with extensive technical, financial, commercial and capital markets experience. The directors have previously raised more than A$2bn from capital markets for a number of exploration and development companies.

 

As a result, the Board has a high level of confidence that the Project will be able to secure funding in due course, having particular regard to:

1.    Required capital expenditure;

2.    Sovereign’s strategic partner relationship with Rio Tinto;

3.    Sovereign’s market capitalisation;

4.    Recent funding activities by directors in respect of other resource projects;

5.    Recently completed funding arrangements for similar or larger scale development projects;

6.    The range of potential funding options available;

7.    The favourable key metrics generated by the Kasiya Project;

8.    Ongoing discussions for potential offtake agreements; and

9.    Investor interest to date.

Environmental, Social, Legal and Governmental – refer to section entitled ‘Environmental & Social Impact’ in the full Announcement at http://sovereignmetals.com.au/announcements/.

 

Sovereign is committed to conduct its activities in full compliance to the requirements of national regulations, its obligations under international conventions and treaties and giving due consideration to international best practices and policies. The Company has appointed an experienced environmental consultant to manage the ESIA process, and environmental and social baseline studies have commenced with appropriately qualified independent experts. The Company has also completed a high-level risk assessment to identify major environmental and social risks which could affect the development of the Project, along with mitigating strategies to allow identified risks to be addressed early in the project design phase.

The Company has embarked on several community engagement exercises in the area and there is a general positive acceptance of the Project. Social responsibility/RAP costs totalling US$92m have been included in this Study, as well as a 0.45% revenue royalty for the community development fund.

Based on the current assessments and commenced ESIA, the Company believes there are no environmental issues currently identified that cannot be appropriately mitigated in accordance with standard practices adopted for the development of mining projects.

Subject to further positive technical studies, Sovereign intends to apply for a ML to secure mineral deposits for mining. Under the Mines Act there are certain requirements, milestones and approvals required prior to submission of a ML application. At this point of Kasiya’s development, the Company notes no known issues or impediments obtaining a ML under normal course of business.

Under the current Mines Act, The Government of Malawi shall have the right, but not the obligation, to acquire, directly or through a Government nominee, without cost, a free equity ownership interest of up to ten percent (10%) in any mining project that will be subject to a large-scale mining licence (>5Mt mined per annum or >US$250m Capex).

As previously noted by the Company, the Government of Malawi has proposed a new Mines and Minerals Bill (2023) (New Bill) which has been passed by the Malawian Parliament and received Presidential Assent, though awaits publication in the Malawi Gazette before coming into force. If approved, the New Bill will replace the current Mines Act. The New Bill introduces amendments to improve transparency and governance of the mining industry in Malawi. Sovereign notes the following updates in the New Bill which may affect the Company in the future: (i) ELs may be granted for an initial period of 5 years with the ability to extend by 3 years on two occasions (total 11 years); (ii) the Malawian Government maintains a right to free equity ownership (as discussed above) for large-scale mining licences but the New Bill proposes to remove the free government equity ownership percentage with the right to be a negotiation matter; and (iii) A new Mining and Regulatory Authority will be responsible for implementing the objectives of the New Bill.

In a Press Release issued on 20 July 2023, the Government of Malawi has publicly applauded the timely investment by Rio Tinto and marked it as a milestone towards realising the country’s aspirations of growing the mining industry as promoted in the Malawi Vision 2063, which identifies mining as a priority industry.

The Government’s statement confirms its commitment to ensuring the growth of the mining sector through deliberate initiatives aiming at establishing a conducive investment environment in the sector.

 

APPENDIX 1 – JORC CODE, 2012 EDITION – TABLE 1

SECTION 1 – SAMPLING TECHNIQUES AND DATA

Criteria

 JORC Code explanation

Commentary

Sampling Techniques

Nature and quality of sampling (e.g. cut channels, random chips, or specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling.

 

Hand Auger (HA) samples are composited based on regolith boundaries and sample chemistry generated by hand-held XRF (pXRF). Each 1m of sample is dried and riffle-split to generate a total sample weight of 3kg for analysis, generally at 2 – 5m intervals. This primary sample is then split again to create a 3kg composite to provide a 1.5kg sample for both rutile and graphite analyses.

Infill Push-Tube (PT) core drilling is sampled routinely at 2m intervals by compositing dried and riffle-split half core. A consistent, 1.5kg sample is generated for both the rutile and graphite determination.

Air-Core (AC) samples are composited based on expertly logged regolith boundaries. Each 1m of sample is dried and riffle-split to generate a total sample weight of 3kg for analysis, generally at 2m intervals. This primary sample is then split again to provide a 1.5kg sample for both rutile and graphite analyses.

Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used.

 

Drilling and sampling activities are supervised by a suitably qualified company geologist who is present at all times. All drill samples are geologically logged by the geologist at the drill site/core yard.

Each sample is sun dried and homogenised. Sub-samples are carefully riffle split to ensure representivity. The 1.5kg composite samples are then processed.

An equivalent mass is taken from each sample to make up the composite. A calibration schedule is in place for laboratory scales, sieves and field XRF equipment.

Placer Consulting Pty Ltd (Placer) Resource Geologists have reviewed Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) for the collection and processing of drill samples and found them to be fit for purpose and support the resource classifications as applied to the Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE). The primary composite sample is considered representative for this style of rutile mineralisation.

 

Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public Report. In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has been done this would be relatively simple (e.g. ‘reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay’). In other cases more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (e.g. submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information.

 

 

Logged mineralogy percentages, lithology/regolith information and TiO2% obtained from pXRF are used to assist in determining compositing intervals. Care is taken to ensure that only samples with similar geological characteristics are composited together.

Drilling Techniques

Drill type (e.g. core, reverse circulation, openhole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (e.g. core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, facesampling bit or other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc).

 

A total of 1,357 HA holes for 12,643m have been drilled to date at the Kasiya Rutile Deposit to obtain samples for quantitative determination of recoverable rutile and Total Graphitic Carbon (TGC).

A PT infill drilling programme, designed to support this resource estimate upgrade, was completed. An additional 234 core holes for 2,368.5m were included in the updated MRE. The total PT holes contributing to the updated MRE are 488 for 4,669m.

A total of 182 AC holes for 4,404m were completed in six locations across the Kasiya deposit deemed likely to fall into mining pit areas. The results are included in this updated MRE.

Placer has reviewed SOPs for HA, PT and AC drilling and found them to be fit for purpose and support the resource classifications as applied to the MRE. Sample handling and preparation techniques are consistent for PT and coring samples.

Two similar designs of HA drilling equipment are employed. HA drilling with 75mm diameter enclosed spiral bits (SOS) with 1m long steel rods and with 62mm diameter open spiral bits (SP) with 1m long steel rods.  Drilling is oriented vertically by eye.

Each 1m of drill sample is collected into separate sample bags and set aside.  The auger bits and flights are cleaned between each metre of sampling to avoid contamination.

Core-drilling is undertaken using a drop hammer, Dando Terrier MK1. The drilling generated 1m runs of 83mm PQ core in the first 2m and then transitioned to 72mm core for the remainder of the hole. Core drilling is oriented vertically by spirit level.

AC drilling was completed by Thompson Drilling utilising a Smith Capital 10R3H compact track-mounted drill. The drilling is vertical and generates 1m samples with care taken in the top metres to ensure good recoveries of the high-grade surface material. Each 1m sample bag is immediately transported back to Sovereign’s field laydown yard where they await processing.

 

Drill Sample Recovery

Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries and results assessed.

 

Samples are assessed visually for recoveries. The configuration of drilling and nature of materials encountered results in negligible sample loss or contamination.

HA and PT drilling is ceased when recoveries become poor once the water table has been reached. Water table and recovery information is included in lithological logs.

Core drilling samples are actively assessed by the driller and geologist onsite for recoveries and contamination.

AC drilling recovery in the top few metres are moderate to good. Extra care is taken to ensure sample is recovered best as possible in these metres. Recoveries are recorded on the rig at the time of drilling by the geologist. Drilling is ceased when recoveries become poor or once Saprock or refusal has been reached.

 

Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure representative nature of the samples.

 

The Company’s trained geologists supervise drilling on a 1 team 1 geologist basis and are responsible for monitoring all aspects of the drilling and sampling process.

For PT drilling, core is extruded into core trays; slough is actively removed by the driller at the drilling rig and core recovery and quality is recorded by the geologist.

AC samples are recovered in large plastic bags. The bags are clearly labelled and delivered back to sovereign’s laydown yard at the end of shift for processing.

 

Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material.

 

No relationship is believed to exist between grade and sample recovery. The high percentage of silt and absence of hydraulic inflow from groundwater at this deposit results in a sample size that is well within the expected size range.

No bias related to preferential loss or gain of different materials is observed.

 

Logging

Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation mining studies and metallurgical studies.

 

Geologically, data is collected in detail, sufficient to aid in Mineral Resource estimation.

All individual 1m HA intervals are geologically logged, recording relevant data to a set log-chief template using company codes. A small representative sample is collected for each 1m interval and placed in appropriately labelled chip trays for future reference.

All individual 1m PT core intervals are geologically logged, recording relevant data to a set log-chief template using company codes.

Half core remains in the trays and is securely stored in the company warehouse.

All individual AC 1-metre intervals are geologically logged, recording relevant features.

data to a set log-chief template using company codes. A small representative sample is collected for each 1-metre interval and placed in appropriately labelled chip trays for future reference.

 

Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc.) photography.

 

All logging includes lithological features and estimates of basic mineralogy. Logging is generally qualitative.

The PT core is photographed dry, after logging and sampling is completed.

 

The total length and percentage of the relevant intersection logged

 

 

100% of samples are geologically logged.

Sub-sampling techniques and sample preparation

If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core taken.

 

 

Due to the soft nature of the material, core samples are carefully cut in half by hand tools.

 

If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc. and whether sampled wet or dry.

HA, PT and AC hole samples are dried, riffle split and composited. Samples are collected and homogenised prior to splitting to ensure sample representivity. ~1.5kg composite samples are processed.

An equivalent mass is taken from each primary sample to make up the composite.

The primary composite sample is considered representative for this style of mineralisation and is consistent with industry standard practice.

 

 

For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample preparation technique.

 

Techniques for sample preparation are detailed on SOP documents verified by Placer Resource Geologists.

Sample preparation is recorded on a standard flow sheet and detailed QA/QC is undertaken on all samples. Sample preparation techniques and QA/QC protocols are appropriate for mineral determination and support the resource classifications as stated.

 

 

Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages to maximise representivity of samples.

 

The sampling equipment is cleaned after each sub-sample is taken.

Field duplicate, laboratory replicate and standard sample geostatistical analysis is employed to manage sample precision and analysis accuracy.

 

Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in situ material collected, including for instance results for field duplicate/second-half sampling.

 

Sample size analysis is completed to verify sampling accuracy. Field duplicates are collected for precision analysis of riffle splitting. SOPs consider sample representivity. Results indicate a sufficient level of precision for the resource classification.

Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being sampled.

 

 

The sample size is considered appropriate for the material sampled.

Quality of assay data and laboratory tests

The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or total.

Rutile

The Malawi onsite laboratory sample preparation methods are considered quantitative to the point where a heavy mineral concentrate (HMC) is generated.

Final results generated are for recovered rutile i.e, the % mass of the sample that is rutile that can be recovered to the non-magnetic component of a HMC.

Heavy liquid separation (HLS) of the HM is no longer required and a HM result is not reported in the updated MRE. The HMC prepared via wet-table, gravity separation at the Lilongwe Laboratory provides an ideal sample for subsequent magnetic separation and XRF.

All 8,855 samples (not incl. QA) included in the MRE update received the following workflow undertaken on-site in Malawi;

·      Dry sample in oven for 1 hour at 105

·      Soak in water and lightly agitate

·      Wet screen at 5mm, 600µm and 45µm to remove oversize and slimes material

·      Dry +45µm -600mm (sand fraction) in oven for 1 hour at 105

7,904 of the 8,855 samples received the following workflow undertaken on-site in Malawi

·      Pass +45µm -600mm (sand fraction) across wet table to generate a HMC.

·      Dry HMC in oven for 30 minutes at 105

Bag HMC fraction and send to Perth, Australia for quantitative chemical and mineralogical determination.

951 of the 8,855 samples received the following workflow undertaken at Perth based Laboratories (superseded).

·      Split ~150g of sand fraction for HLS using Tetrabromoethane (TBE, SG 2.96g/cc) as the liquid heavy media to generate HMC. Work undertaken at Diamantina Laboratories.

4,738 of the 8,855 samples received magnetic separation undertaken at Allied Mineral Laboratories in Perth, Western Australia.

·      Magnetic separation of the HMC by Carpco magnet @ 16,800G (2.9Amps) into a magnetic (M) and non-magnetic (NM) fraction.

4,117 of the 8,855 samples received magnetic separation undertaken on-site in Malawi. 

·      Magnetic separation of the HMC by Mineral Technologies Reading Pilot IRM (Induced Roll Magnetic) @ 16,800G (2.9Amps) into a magnetic (M) and non-magnetic (NM) fraction.

All 8,855 routine samples received the following chemical analysis in Perth, Western Australia.

·      The routine NM fractions are sent to ALS Metallurgy Perth for quantitative XRF analysis. Samples receive XRF_MS and are analysed for:  TiO2, Al2O3, CaO, Cr2O3, Fe2O3, K2O, MgO, MnO, SiO2, V2O5, ZrO2, HfO2.

Graphite

8,078 graphite samples are processed at Intertek-Genalysis Johannesburg and Perth via method C72/CSA.

A portion of each test sample is dissolved in dilute hydrochloric acid to liberate carbonate carbon. The solution is filtered using a filter paper and the collected residue is the dried to 425°C in a muffle oven to drive off organic carbon. The dried sample is then combusted in a Carbon/ Sulphur analyser to yield total graphitic or TGC.

An Eltra CS-800 induction furnace infra-red CS analyser is then used to determine the remaining carbon which is reported as TGC as a percentage.

For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc., the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc.

 

 

Acceptable levels of accuracy and precision have been established. No pXRF methods are used for quantitative determination.

Nature of quality control procedures adopted (e.g. standards, blanks, duplicate, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (i.e. lack of bias) and precision have been established.

 

Sovereign uses internal and externally sourced wet screening reference material inserted into samples batches at a rate of 1 in 20. The externally sourced, certified standard reference material for HM and Slimes assessment is provided by Placer Consulting.

An external laboratory raw sample duplicate is sent to laboratories in Perth, Australia as an external check of the full workflow. These duplicates are produced at a rate of 1 in 20.

Accuracy monitoring is achieved through submission of certified reference materials (CRM’s). ALS and Intertek both use internal CRMs and duplicates on XRF analyses.

Sovereign also inserts CRMs into the sample batches at a rate of 1 in 20.

Three Rutile CRMs are used by Sovereign and range from 35% – 95% TiO2.

Three Graphite CRMs are used by Sovereign and range from 3% – 25% TGC.

Analysis of sample duplicates is undertaken by standard geostatistical methodologies (Scatter, Pair Difference and QQ Plots) to test for bias and to ensure that sample splitting is representative.  Standards determine assay accuracy performance, monitored on control charts, where failure (beyond 3SD from the mean) may trigger re-assay of the affected batch.

Examination of the QA/QC sample data indicates satisfactory performance of field sampling protocols and assay laboratories providing acceptable levels of precision and accuracy.

Acceptable levels of accuracy and precision are displayed in geostatistical analyses to support the resource classifications as applied to the estimate.

 

 

Verification of sampling & assaying

The verification of significant intersections by either independent or alternative company personnel.

 

Results are reviewed in cross-section using Datamine Studio RM software and any spurious results are investigated.  The deposit type and consistency of mineralisation leaves little room for unexplained variance. Extreme high grades are not encountered.

 

The use of twinned holes.

Twinned holes are drilled across a geographically dispersed area to determine short-range geological and assay field variability for the resource estimation.  Twin drilling is applied at a rate of 1 in 20 routine holes. Twin paired data in all drill methods represent ~4% of the database included in the updated MRE. Substantial comparative data between different drilling types and test pit results are also available but not referenced in the MRE.

Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols.

All data are collected electronically using coded templates and logging software. This data is then imported to a cloud hosted Database and validated automatically and manually.

A transition to electronic field and laboratory data capture has been achieved.

 

Discuss any adjustment to assay data.

 

Assay data adjustments are made to convert laboratory collected weights to assay field percentages and to account for moisture.

QEMSCAN of the NM fraction shows dominantly clean and liberated rutile grains and confirms rutile is the only titanium species in the NM fraction.

Recovered rutile is defined and reported here as: TiO2 recovered in the +45 to -600um range to the NM concentrate fraction as a % of the total primary, dry, raw sample mass divided by 95% (to represent an approximation of final product specifications). i.e recoverable rutile within the whole sample.

 

Location of data points

Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource estimation.

 

A Trimble R2 Differential GPS is used to pick up the collars. Daily capture at a registered reference marker ensures equipment remains in calibration.

No downhole surveying of any holes is completed. Given the vertical nature and shallow depths of the holes, drill hole deviation is not considered to significantly affect the downhole location of samples.

 

 

Specification of the grid system used.

WGS84 UTM Zone 36 South.

 

Quality and adequacy of topographic control.

The digital terrane model (DTM) was generated by wireframing a 20m-by-20m lidar drone survey point array, commissioned by SVM in March 2022. Major cultural features were removed from the survey points file prior to generating the topographical wireframe for resource model construction. The ultra-high resolution 3D drone aerial survey was executed utilising a RTK GPS equipped Zenith aircraft with accuracy of <10cm ground sampling distance (GSD). Post-processing includes the removal of cultural features that do not reflect material movements (pits, mounds, etc)

The DTM is suitable for the classification of the resources as stated.

 

Data spacing & distribution

Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results.

The HA collars are spaced at nominally 400m along the 400m spaced drill-lines with the PT holes similarly spaced at an offset, infill grid. The resultant 200m-by-200m drill spacing (to the strike orientation of the deposit) is deemed to adequately define the mineralisation in the MRE.

The AC collars are spaced on a 200m x 200m grid which is deemed to adequately define the mineralisation.

The PT twin and density sample holes are selectively placed throughout the deposit to ensure a broad geographical and lithological spread for the analysis. 

 

Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied.

The drill spacing and distribution is considered to be sufficient to establish a degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource estimation.  

Kriging neighbourhood analysis completed using Supervisor software informs the optimal drill and sample spacing for the MRE. Based on these results and the experience of the Competent Person, the data spacing and distribution is considered adequate for the definition of mineralisation and adequate for Mineral Resource Estimation.

 

Whether sample compositing has been applied.

Individual 1m auger intervals have been composited, based on lithology, at 2 – 5m sample intervals for the 1,357 HA holes. 488 PT core holes have been sampled at a regular 2m interval to provide greater control on mineralisation for the Indicated Resource.

Individual 1m intervals have been composited, based on lithology, at a max 2m sample interval for the 182 AC holes.

The DH Compositing tool was utilised in Supervisor software to define the optimal sample compositing length. A 2m interval is applied to the MRE.

 

Orientation of data in relation to geological structure

Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of possible structures and the extent to which this is known considering the deposit type

 

Sample orientation is vertical and approximately perpendicular to the orientation of the mineralisation, which results in true thickness estimates, limited by the sampling interval as applied. Drilling and sampling are carried out on a regular square grid. There is no apparent bias arising from the orientation of the drill holes with respect to the orientation of the deposit.

 

If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material.

 

 

There is no apparent bias arising from the orientation of the drill holes with respect to the orientation of the deposit.

Sample security

The measures taken to ensure sample security

Samples are stored in secure storage from the time of drilling, through gathering, compositing and analysis.  The samples are sealed as soon as site preparation is complete.

A reputable international transport company with shipment tracking enables a chain of custody to be maintained while the samples move from Malawi to Australia. Samples are again securely stored once they arrive and are processed at Australian laboratories. A reputable domestic courier company manages the movement of samples within Perth, Australia.

At each point of the sample workflow the samples are inspected by a company representative to monitor sample condition. Each laboratory confirms the integrity of the samples upon receipt. 

Audits or reviews

The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data

 

The CP Richard Stockwell has reviewed and advised on all stages of data collection, sample processing, QA protocol and Mineral Resource Estimation. Methods employed are considered industry best-practice.

Perth Laboratory visits have been completed by Mr Stockwell. Field and in-country lab visits have been completed by Mr Stockwell in May 2022. A high standard of operation, procedure and personnel was observed and reported.

Sovereign Metals Managing Director Julian Stephens and Exploration Manager Samuel Moyle have been onsite in Malawi numerous times since the discovery of the Kasiya Deposit.

 

SECTION 2 – REPORTING OF EXPLORATION RESULTS

Criteria

Explanation

Commentary

Mineral tenement & land tenure status

Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites, wilderness or national park and environment settings.

The Company owns 100% of the following Exploration Licences (ELs) and Licence Applications (APLs) under the Mines and Minerals Act 2019, held in the Company’s wholly-owned, Malawi-registered subsidiaries: EL0561, EL0492, EL0609, EL0582, EL0545, EL0528, EL0657 and APL0404.

A 5% royalty is payable to the government upon mining and a 2% of net profit royalty is payable to the original project vendor.

No significant native vegetation or reserves exist in the area. The region is intensively cultivated for agricultural crops.

The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area.

The tenements are in good standing and no known impediments to exploration or mining exist.

Exploration done by other parties

 

Acknowledgement and appraisal of exploration by other parties.

Sovereign Metals Ltd is a first-mover in the discovery and definition of residual rutile and graphite resources in Malawi. No other parties are, or have been, involved in exploration.

 

Geology

Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation

The rutile deposit type is considered a residual placer formed by the intense weathering of rutile-rich basement paragneisses and variable enrichment by elluvial processes.

Rutile occurs in a mostly topographically flat area west of Malawi’s capital, known as the Lilongwe Plain, where a deep tropical weathering profile is preserved. A typical profile from top to base is generally soil (“SOIL” 0-1m) ferruginous pedolith (“FERP”, 1-4m), mottled zone (“MOTT”, 4-7m), pallid saprolite (“PSAP”, 7-9m), saprolite (“SAPL”, 9-25m), saprock (“SAPR”, 25-35m) and fresh rock (“FRESH” >35m).

The low-grade graphite mineralisation occurs as multiple bands of graphite gneisses, hosted within a broader Proterozoic paragneiss package. In the Kasiya areas specifically, the preserved weathering profile hosts significant vertical thicknesses, from near surface, of graphite mineralisation.

 

Drill hole information

A summary of all information material to the understanding of the exploration results including a tabulation of the following information for all Material drill holes: easting and northings of the drill hole collar; elevation or RL (Reduced Level-elevation above sea level in metres of the drill hole collar); dip and azimuth of the hole; down hole length and interception depth; and hole length

All intercepts relating to the Kasiya Deposit have been included in public releases during each phase of exploration and in this report. Releases included all collar and composite data and these can be viewed on the Company website.

There are no further drill hole results that are considered material to the understanding of the exploration results. Identification of the broad zone of mineralisation is made via multiple intersections of drill holes and to list them all would not give the reader any further clarification of the distribution of mineralisation throughout the deposit.

 

If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that the information is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from the understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly explain why this is the case

No information has been excluded.

Data aggregation methods

In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques, maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (e.g. cutting of high-grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material and should be stated.

All results reported are of a length-weighted average of in-situ grades. The resource is reported at a range of bottom cut-off grades in recognition that optimisation and financial assessment is outstanding.

A nominal bottom cut of 0.7% rutile is offered, based on preliminary assessment of resource product value and anticipated cost of operations.

Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high-grade results and longer lengths of low-grade results, the procedure used for such aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of such aggregations should be shown in detail.

No data aggregation was required.

The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values should be clearly stated.

Rutile Equivalent (RutEq)

Formula: ((Rutile Grade x Recovery (100%) x Rutile Price (US$1,484/t) + Graphite Grade x Recovery (67.5%) x Graphite Price (US$1,290/t)) / Rutile Price (US$1,484/t)).

Commodity Prices:

·      Rutile price: US$1,484/t

·      Graphite price: US$1,290/t

Metallurgical Recovery to Product:

·      Rutile Recovery: 100%

·      Graphite Recovery: 67.5%

All assumptions taken from this Study and with discussion and Modifying Factors included in this document.

Relationship between mineralisation widths & intercept lengths

These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of Exploration Results.

The mineralisation has been released by weathering of the underlying, layered gneissic bedrock that broadly trends NE-SW at Kasiya North and N-S at Kasiya South. It lies in a laterally extensive superficial blanket with high-grade zones reflecting the broad bedrock strike orientation of ~045° in the North of Kasiya and 360° in the South of Kasiya.

 

If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is known, its nature should be reported.

The mineralisation is laterally extensive where the entire weathering profile is preserved and not significantly eroded. Minor removal of the mineralised profile has occurred in alluvial channels. These areas are adequately defined by the drilling pattern and topographical control for the resource estimate.

If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there should be a clear statement to this effect (e.g. ‘down hole length, true width not known’.

Downhole widths approximate true widths limited to the sample intervals applied. Mineralisation remains open at depth and in areas coincident with high-rutile grade lithologies in basement rocks, is increasing with depth. Graphite results are approximate true width as defined by the sample interval and typically increase with depth.

 

Diagrams

Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of intercepts should be included for any significant discovery being reported. These should include, but not be limited to a plan view of the drill collar locations and appropriate sectional views.

Refer to figures in this report and in previous releases. These are accessible on the Company’s webpage.

Balanced reporting

Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not practicable, representative reporting of both low and high-grades and/or widths should be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of exploration results.

All results are included in this report and in previous releases. These are accessible on the Company’s webpage.

Other substantive exploration data

Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be reported including (but not limited to: geological observations; geophysical survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples – size and method of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock characteristics; potential deleterious or contaminating substances.

Limited lateritic duricrust has been variably developed at Kasiya, as is customary in tropical highland areas subjected to seasonal wet/dry cycles. Lithological logs record drilling refusal in just under 2% of the HA/PT drill database. No drilling refusal was recorded above the saprock interface by AC drilling.

Slimes (-45 µm) averages 46wt% in the Indicated Resource at a 0.7% rutile bottom cut. Separation test work conducted at AML demonstrates the success in applying a contemporary mineral sands flowsheet in treating this material and achieving excellent rutile recovery.

Sample quality (representivity) is established by geostatistical analysis of comparable sample intervals.

Several generations of QEMSCAN analysis of the NM performed at ALS Metallurgy fraction shows dominantly clean and liberated rutile grains and confirms rutile is the only titanium species in the NM fraction.

 

Further work

The nature and scale of planned further work (e.g. test for lateral extensions or depth extensions or large-scale step-out drilling).

Further AC drilling will allow the definition of a more extensive saprock-interface basement and should continue to deliver additional resources below the HA/PT-drilled regions.

A greater understanding of the lithological character and extent of those basement units, where high-grade (>1%) rutile persists at the saprock interface, may assist in focussing further resource definition and exploration targeting. 

Further metallurgical assessment is suggested to characterise rutile quality and establish whether any chemical variability is inherent across the deposit.

Trialling drill definition at a 100m spacing is suggested for Measured Resource assessment.

 

Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions, including the main geological interpretations and future drilling areas, provided this information is not commercially sensitive.

Refer to diagrams in the body of this report and in previous releases. These are accessible on the Company’s webpage.

 

 

SECTION 3 – ESTIMATION AND REPORTING OF MINERAL RESOURCES

Criteria

JORC Code explanation

Commentary

 

Measures taken to ensure that data has not been corrupted by, for example, transcription or keying errors, between its initial collection and its use for Mineral Resource estimation purposes.

Data are manually entered into database tables according to SOPs and conforming to company field names and classifications. These are then migrated to Datashed5 cloud-hosted database managed internally by the Company with validation and quarantine capability. Relevant tables from the database are exported to csv format and forwarded to Placer for independent review.

Data validation procedures used.

Validation of the primary data include checks for overlapping intervals, missing survey data, missing assay data, missing lithological data, missing and mis-matched (to Lithology) collars.

Statistical, out-of-range, distribution, error and missing data validation is completed by Placer on data sets before being compiled into a de-surveyed drill hole file and interrogated in 3D using Datamine Studio RM software.

All questions relating to the input data are forwarded to the client for review and resolution prior to resource estimation.

Comment on any site visits undertaken by the Competent Person and the outcome of those visits.

 

Perth Laboratory visits have been completed by the Competent Person, Mr Richard Stockwell. Field and in-country lab visits were complete over a 1-week period in May 2022. A high standard of operation, procedure and personnel was observed and reported.

If no site visits have been undertaken indicate why this is the case.

Not applicable

Confidence in (or conversely, the uncertainty of) the geological interpretation of the mineral deposit.

 

There is a high degree of repeatability and uniformity in the geological character of the Kasiya Deposit demonstrated by lithological logging of AC, PT core and HA samples. Satellite imagery and airborne geophysical data provided guidance for interpreting the strike continuity of the deposit.

Drill hole intercept logging and assay results (AC, PT and HA), stratigraphic interpretations from drill core and geological logs of drill data have formed the basis for the geological interpretation. The drilling exclusively targeted the SOIL, FERP, MOTT and SAPL weathering horizons, with no sampling of the SAPR and below the upper level of the fresh rock (FRESH) domain.

Nature of the data used and of any assumptions made.

 

No assumptions were made.

The effect, if any, of alternative interpretations on Mineral Resource estimation.

No alternative interpretations on Mineral Resource Estimation are offered.

The use of geology in guiding and controlling Mineral Resource estimation.

 

The mineral resource is constrained by the drill array plus one interval in each of the X, Y and Z axes.

The topographical DTM constrains the vertical extent of the resource. Rutile, enriched at surface by deflation and elluvial processes, is constrained internally by a hard boundary at the base of the SOIL and FERP horizons that overly the (generally less-mineralised) MOTT and SAPL horizons. In this way, continuity of rutile, observed in surface drilling results, is honoured between drill lines rather than being diluted by averaging with underlying, lower-grade material.

The base to mineralisation is arbitrarily designated at effective drill depth plus one (average sample width) interval in the Z orientation in HA/PT drilling. The effective drill depth is where HA drilling intersects the static water table, rather than being a true depth to un-mineralised basement. Deeper drilling using the AC method has shown rutile enrichment persists to bedrock and a material resource increase is anticipated upon application of this method to a broader area.

A base to mineralisation of BOH plus 2.7m (-2.7 RL) is retained for this estimate, where drilled by HA/PT methods. This basement horizon is interpreted on 200m north sections and accounts for artifacts of ineffective drilling terminating in soil or ferp horizons. It is applied consistently to both Indicated and Inferred resource areas.

AC drilling has accurately defined depth to basement at the saprock interface, which has been modelled where intersected in the updated MRE.

The factors affecting continuity both of grade and geology.

Rutile grade is generally concentrated in surface regolith horizons. Deposit stratigraphy and weathering is consistent along and across strike. Rutile grade trend is oriented at 45 degrees at Kasiya North and 360 degrees at Kasiya South, which mimics the underlying basement source rocks and residual topography. Rutile varies across strike as a result of the layering of mineralised and non-mineralised basement rocks.

The extent and variability of the Mineral Resource expressed as length (along strike or otherwise), plan width, and depth below surface to the upper and lower limits of the Mineral Resource.

The Kasiya mineralised footprint strikes NE – SW and currently occupies an area of about 201km2.

Depth to basement is described previously.

The nature and appropriateness of the estimation technique(s) applied and key assumptions, including treatment of extreme grade values, domaining, interpolation parameters and maximum distance of extrapolation from data points. If a computer assisted estimation method was chosen include a description of computer software and parameters used.

 

Datamine Studio RM and Supervisor software are used for the data analysis, variography, geological interpretation and resource estimation. Key fields are interpolated into the volume model using a range of parameters and interpolation methods to establish best fit for the deposit. For the Kasiya MRE update, the Inverse Distance weighting (power 4) method was seen to perform a superior interpolation of informing data and replication of the high-value and thin, surface (SOIL/FERP) grade distribution. This was assisted by the (customary) application of a Dynamic Anisotropy search, informed by the results of variography, Suitable limitations on the number of samples and the impact of those samples, was maintained.

Extreme grade values were not identified by statistical analysis, nor were they anticipated in this style of deposit.  No top cut is applied to the resource estimation.

Interpolation was constrained by hard boundaries (domains) that result from the geological interpretation.

The availability of check estimates, previous estimates and/or mine production records and whether the Mineral Resource estimate takes appropriate account of such data.

This is the fourth MRE for the Kasiya Deposit.

Bulk-scale test work has been completed and results support the view of the Competent Person that an economic deposit of readily separable, high-quality rutile is anticipated from the Kasiya Deposit. The recovery of a coarse-flake graphite by-product was achieved by the test work.

The assumptions made regarding recovery of by-products.

A graphite co-product was modelled as recoverable TGC.

Estimation of deleterious elements or other non-grade variables of economic significance (e.g. sulphur for acid mine drainage characterisation).

No significant deleterious elements are identified. A selection of assay, magnetic separation and XRF results are modelled and are reported.

In the case of block model interpolation, the block size in relation to the average sample spacing and the search employed.

 

The average parent cell size used is equivalent to the average drill hole spacing within the Indicated Resource (200m*200m).  Cell size in the Z-axis is established to cater for the composite sample spacing and definition of the Topsoil domain. This resulted in a parent cell size of 200m x 200m x 3m for the volume model with 5 sub-cell splits available in the X and Y axes and 10 in the Z axis to smooth topographical and lithological transitions. Both parent cell and sub-cell interpolations were completed and reported. The sub-cell interpolation was again applied to this MRE as it better reflected the geological interpretation and a reasonable graduation of informing data through intermediate cell areas.

A Topsoil horizon has been defined at 0.3m thickness throughout the Indicated Resource area to support anticipated ore reserve calculation and mining studies. Topsoil is disclosed separately but remains in the MRE in recognition of advanced rehabilitation studies in the PFS by Agreenco.

Any assumptions behind modelling of selective mining units.

No assumptions were made regarding the modelling of selective mining units.  The resource is reported at an Indicated level of confidence and is suitable for optimisation and the calculation of a Probable Reserve.

Any assumptions about correlation between variables.

 

No assumptions were made regarding the correlation between variables.

Description of how the geological interpretation was used to control the resource estimates.

 

Interpolation was constrained by hard boundaries (domains) that result from the geological interpretation.

Discussion of basis for using or not using grade cutting or capping.

Extreme grade values were not identified by statistical analysis, nor were they anticipated in this style of deposit.  No top cut is applied to the resource estimation.

The process of validation, the checking process used, the comparison of model data to drill hole data, and use of reconciliation data if available.

Validation of grade interpolations was done visually In Datamine by loading model and drill hole files and annotating, colouring and using filtering to check for the appropriateness of interpolations.

Statistical distributions were prepared for model zones from both drill holes and the model to compare the effectiveness of the interpolation. Distributions of section line averages (swath plots) for drill holes and models were also prepared for each zone and orientation for comparison purposes.

The resource model has effectively averaged informing drill hole data and is considered suitable to support the resource classifications as applied to the estimate.

Whether the tonnages are estimated on a dry basis or with natural moisture, and the method of determination of the moisture content.

Tonnages are estimated on a dry basis. No moisture content is factored.

The basis of the adopted cut-off grade(s) or quality parameters applied.

The resource is reported at a range of bottom cut-off grades in recognition that optimisation and financial assessment is outstanding.

A nominal bottom cut of 0.7% rutile is offered, based on preliminary assessment of resource value and anticipated operational cost.

Assumptions made regarding possible mining methods, minimum mining dimensions and internal (or, if applicable, external) mining dilution. It is always necessary as part of the process of determining reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction to consider potential mining methods, but the assumptions made regarding mining methods and parameters when estimating Mineral Resources may not always be rigorous. Where this is the case, this should be reported with an explanation of the basis of the mining assumptions made.

Hydro-mining has been determined as the optimal method of mining for the Kasiya Rutile deposit. The materials competence is loose, soft, fine and friable with no cemented sand or dense clay layers rendering it amenable to hydro-mining. It is considered that the strip ratio would be zero or near zero.

Dilution is considered to be minimal as mineralisation commonly occurs from surface and mineralisation is generally gradational with few sharp boundaries.

Recovery parameters have not been factored into the estimate.  However, the valuable minerals are readily separable due to their SG differential and are expected to have a high recovery through the proposed, conventional wet concentration plant.

The basis for assumptions or predictions regarding metallurgical amenability. It is always necessary as part of the process of determining reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction to consider potential metallurgical methods, but the assumptions regarding metallurgical treatment processes and parameters made when reporting Mineral Resources may not always be rigorous. Where this is the case, this should be reported with an explanation of the basis of the metallurgical assumptions made.

Rigorous metallurgical testwork on rutile and graphite recoverability and specifications has been completed on numerous bulk samples since 2018.

Rutile recovered to product is modelled at 100% and graphite recovered to product is modelled at 67.5%.

Both products have best-in-class chemical and physical specifications.

Refer to text for further details.

 

Assumptions made regarding possible waste and process residue disposal options. It is always necessary as part of the process of determining reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction to consider the potential environmental impacts of the mining and processing operation. While at this stage the determination of potential environmental impacts, particularly for a greenfields project, may not always be well advanced, the status of early consideration of these potential environmental impacts should be reported. Where these aspects have not been considered this should be reported with an explanation of the environmental assumptions made.

A large portion of the Mineral Resource is confined to the SOIL, FERP and MOTT weathering domains, and any sulphide minerals have been oxidised in the geological past. Therefore, acid mine-drainage is not anticipated to be a significant risk when mining from the oxidised domain.

 

The Kasiya deposit is located within a farming area and has villages located along the strike of the deposit. Sovereign holds regular discussions with local landholders and community groups to keep them well informed of the status and future planned directions of the project. Sovereign has benefited from maintaining good relations with landowners and enjoys strong support from the community at large.

Kasiya is in a sub-equatorial region of Malawi and is subject to heavy seasonal rainfall, with rapid growth of vegetation in season. Substantial vegetation or nature reserve is absent in the area.

Whether assumed or determined. If assumed, the basis for the assumptions. If determined, the method used, whether wet or dry, the frequency of the measurements, the nature, size and representativeness of the samples.

Density was calculated from 310 full core samples taken from geographically and lithologically-diverse sites across the deposit. Density is calculated using a cylinder volume wet and dry method performed by Sovereign in Malawi and calculations verified by Placer Consulting.

Density data was loaded into an Excel file, which was flagged against weathering horizons and mineralisation domains. These results were then averaged, by domain and applied to the MRE.

The bulk density for bulk material must have been measured by methods that adequately account for void spaces (vughs, porosity, etc.), moisture and differences between rock and alteration zones within the deposit.

As above.

Discuss assumptions for bulk density estimates used in the evaluation process of the different materials.

An average density of 1.65 t/m3 was determined for the total weathering profile.

This incorporates and average density of 1.39 t/m3 for the SOIL domain, 1.58 t/m3 for the FERP domain, 1.66 t/m3 for the MOTT domain, 1.69 t/m3 for the PSAP domain, 1.97 t/m3 for the SAPL domain, and 1.95 t/m3 for the LAT domain. Density data are interpolated into the resource estimate by the nearest neighbour method.

The basis for the classification of the Mineral Resources into varying confidence categories.

 

Classification of the MRE is at an Indicated and Inferred category. Minor regions of unclassified material occur in sparsely drilled, typically extraneous regions of the mineralised area. These are excluded from the resource inventory.  

Inferred classification is attributed to those areas with drilling spaced at 400m x 400m. Indicated classification is attributed to those areas with drilling spaced at 200m x 200m.

Whether appropriate account has been taken of all relevant factors (i.e. relative confidence in tonnage/grade estimations, reliability of input data, confidence in continuity of geology and metal values, quality, quantity and distribution of the data).

All available data were assessed and the competent person’s relative confidence in the data was used to assist in the classification of the Mineral Resource.

Whether the result appropriately reflects the Competent Person’s view of the deposit

Results appropriately reflects a reasonable and conservative view of the deposit.

The results of any audits or reviews of Mineral Resource estimates.

Independent audit of the MRE construction was contracted to Datamine Australia by Placer prior to delivery to SVM. A third party is engaged by SVM for a further verification of the MRE.

Where appropriate a statement of the relative accuracy and confidence level in the Mineral Resource estimate using an approach or procedure deemed appropriate by the Competent Person. For example, the application of statistical or geostatistical procedures to quantify the relative accuracy of the resource within stated confidence limits, or, if such an approach is not deemed appropriate, a qualitative discussion of the factors that could affect the relative accuracy and confidence of the estimate.

Substantial additional mineralisation was expected to occur below the effective depth of HA and PT drilling. This has been confirmed by the deeper AC drilling.

A high-degree of uniformity exists in the broad and contiguous lithological and grade character of the deposit. Drilling technique have been expertly applied and data collection procedures, density assessments, QA protocols and interpretations conform to industry best practice with few exceptions.

Assay, mineralogical determinations and metallurgical test work conform to industry best practice and demonstrate a rigorous assessment of product and procedure. The development of a conventional processing flowsheet and marketability studies support the classification of the Kasiya Resource.

The statement should specify whether it relates to global or local estimates, and, if local, state the relevant tonnages, which should be relevant to technical and economic evaluation. Documentation should include assumptions made and the procedures used.

The estimate is global.

 

These statements of relative accuracy and confidence of the estimate should be compared with production data, where available.

No production data are available to reconcile model results.

 

SECTION 4 – ESTIMATION AND REPORTING OF ORE RESERVES

 

Criteria

Explanation

Commentary

Mineral Resource estimate for conversion to Ore Reserves

 

Description of the Mineral Resource estimate used as a basis for the conversion to an Ore Reserve.

 

Clear statement as to whether the Mineral Resources are reported additional to, or inclusive of, the Ore Reserves.

The Minerals Resource Estimate (“MRE”) declared on 5 April 2023 underpins the Ore Reserve. Sovereign engaged independent geological and mining consultants Placer to complete the MRE for the Kasiya deposit.

The principal resource geologist Mr Richard Stockwell is highly experienced with more than 25 years in resource estimation and mine geology. Mr Richard Stockwell is a Competent Person for the purposes of the MRE as defined and in accordance with the JORC Code 2012.

The MRE as reported in this document is inclusive of the Ore Reserve declared in this document. The Ore Reserve does not include Inferred Mineral Resources.

Site visits

Comment on any site visits undertaken by the Competent Person and the outcome of those visits.

Site visits have been carried out by the following personnel:

·        Mr Ryan Locke, as representative for the Competent Person Mr Ross Cheyne for the JORC Reserve Estimate has been to site on multiple site visits prior to and since the discovery of the Kasiya Deposit.

·        Mr Richard Stockwell, the Competent Person for the JORC Mineral Resource Estimate and a representative of Placer Consulting Pty Ltd has conducted one site visit.

·        Mr Samuel Moyle, the Competent Person for Exploration Results and Exploration Manager of Sovereign Metals Ltd has conducted multiple site visits since the discovery of the Kasiya deposit;

Study status

The type and level of study undertaken to enable Mineral Resources to be converted to Ore Reserves.

The Code requires that a study to at least Pre-Feasibility Study level has been undertaken to convert Mineral Resources to Ore Reserves. Such studies will have been carried out and will have determined a mine plan that is technically achievable and economically viable, and that material Modifying Factors have been considered.

The technical and financial information in this release is at PFS-level enabling the declaration of Ore Reserves. The studies carried out have determined a mine plan that is technically achievable and economically viable with all material Modifying Factors having been considered.

The Ore Reserve was underpinned by a mine plan detailing mining locations, ore and waste quantities; plant feed quantities and plant head grades. Scheduling was undertaken in annual and quarterly periods.

Mine planning activities included an updated pit optimisation, development of mineable pit geometries, scheduling, mining cost estimation and financial analysis in order to confirm the ability to economically mine the Kasiya Ore Reserve.

Modifying factors considered during the mine planning process included pit slope design criteria, mining costs, mining dilution and ore loss, processing recoveries, processing costs, selling costs, general and administration costs and product price.

Cut-off parameters

The basis of the adopted cut-off grade(s) or quality parameters applied.

Pit cut-off grades varied between 0.7% and 0.9% rutile with cut-offs selected to provide the most tonnage whilst minimising the pit footprint to have as little environmental/social impact as possible.

The selected cut-off grades are above the final project breakeven cut-off grade of approximately 0.40% rutile.

Mining factors or assumptions

 

The method and assumptions used as reported in the Pre-Feasibility or Feasibility Study to convert the Mineral Resource to an Ore Reserve (i.e. either by application of appropriate factors by optimisation or by preliminary or detailed design).

The choice, nature and appropriateness of the selected mining method(s) and other mining parameters including associated design issues such as pre-strip, access, etc.

The assumptions made regarding geotechnical parameters (e.g. pit slopes, stope sizes, etc.), grade control and pre-production drilling.

The major assumptions made and Mineral Resource model used for pit and stope optimisation (if appropriate).

The mining dilution factors used.

The mining recovery factors used.

Any minimum mining widths used.

The manner in which Inferred Mineral Resources are utilised in mining studies and the sensitivity of the outcome to their inclusion.

The infrastructure requirements of the selected mining methods.

The Kasiya MRE released by Sovereign in on 5 April 2023 was used as the basis for the PFS Ore Reserve estimate. Mineral Resources were converted to Ore Reserves in line with the material classifications which reflect the level of confidence within the resource estimate. The Ore Reserve reflects that portion of the Mineral Resource which can be economically extracted by open pits utilising a combination of hydro mining and limited truck/shovel methodologies. The Ore Reserve considers the modifying factors and other parameters detailed in the relevant sections of the PFS report, including but not limited to the mining, metallurgical, social, environmental, approvals, tenure, statutory and financial aspects of the project.

In line with the JORC 2012 guidelines, the Kasiya Probable Ore Reserve is based on Indicated classified Mineral Resources. There is no Measured classified Mineral Resource at Kasiya and consequently no Proved Ore Reserve. Inferred classified material is not included in the Ore Reserve and therefore is not considered for mining.

The reported MRE is inclusive of the resources converted to Ore Reserves.

The Ore Reserve includes an allowance for mining dilution and ore loss on the basis that all material within the shell is classified and extracted as ore.

The open pit geometries developed for the purposes of mine planning, and which define the subsequent Ore Reserve, are based on Whittle pit shells edited to comply with practical mining requirements and identified exclusion zones.

Selection of Mining method

The mining options were evaluated in detail during the PFS to determine the best suited mining method for the operation. The criteria for selection were based not only on capital and operating cost, but ESG considerations and infrastructure requirements. Sovereign performed testwork on ROM material and conducted an independent assessment and trade-off analysis for all possible mining methods. The outcomes of this work resulted in hydro mining being determined as the optimal method for mining the Kasiya rutile- graphite deposit. Due to the consistent particle size distribution through the reserve, favourable operating and capital costs, low carbon footprint and air pollution (low dust and no diesel emissions) as well as the support of infrastructure and water availability within the project designated footprint.

Hydro-mining is defined as the excavation of material from its in-situ state using pressurised water. A stream of high-pressure water is directed at the ore with the purpose of mechanically breaking and softening the material so that it can be carried away by the created gravitational slurry flow. The mineralisation at Kasiya is largely homogenous and has relatively consistent physical properties throughout the MRE and contained Ore Reserve. The material competence is described as loose and friable, soft and well weathered with no cemented particles or dense clay layers. The particle size distribution (PSD) is favourable for hydro-mining due to its high content of -45µm fines and the fines component effectively increases the viscosity of the slurry created, which enhances the slurry’s ability to carry sand and heavy mineral particles.

Hydro mining is a proven technology and has been successfully applied on heavy mineral sand operations in Africa.  Hydro mining for the PFS is based on the block-mine and top-down methodologies. The top-down operational method has advantages in terms of safety, achieving and maintaining design slurry densities, achieving and maintaining design production rates and ease of planning and control.

Sovereign Mining engaged Fraser Alexander, a highly experienced mining contractor and consultancy specialising in hydro-mining to provide engineering and cost inputs for hydro-mining in the PFS.

Dry mining methods are required where hydro mining is inefficient and will be required to push approximately 11% of the Ore Reserve. These are the “basin” of the hydro mining areas which need selective “floor clean-up” mining.

Pit Optimisation

An open pit optimisation utilising Whittle™ software was carried out on the Kasiya deposit using Indicated Mineral Resources only (in line with the JORC 2012 guidelines). The latest parameters available were used to determine the economic extent of the open pit excavation. The process plant production parameters were supplied by Sovereign with an initial rate of 12mtpa and a ramp up in production from years 5 – 7 to an annual rate of 24Mtpa.

The intention to hydro-mine the majority of the defined Ore Reserve means that there is no ability to selectively mine and all material will be extracted and sent as plant feed. Therefore, all material within the “shell” will be extracted and fed to the plant as ore and any interstitial waste and/or sub-economic grade material will be likewise treated as diluent material. However, due to the relatively homogenous and continuous nature the orebody, the quantities of this material will be relatively small and therefore a simple 5% dilution was applied within the Whittle™ tool to approximate this assumption.

For the PFS, an overall slope angle of 20 degrees has been applied within the optimisation, in line with a conservative stable angle for a mineral sands operation.

 

Mineable Pit Geometries

Based on the cut-off grades applied, the optimization shells were further were further refined to develop a mineable geometry. The process applied the following constraints:

–      A minimum depth of 5m for the hydro mining method.

–      Removal of any small, isolated pits.

–      Pit extents limited to mineable areas and to remain outside of identified exclusion areas wherever reasonably possible. Sovereign identified all local village areas and areas of cultural or environmental significance within the potential mining envelope that should not be disturbed during the mining phase of the Project.

Metallurgical factors or assumptions

The metallurgical process proposed and the appropriateness of that process to the style of mineralisation.

Whether the metallurgical process is well-tested technology or novel in nature.

The nature, amount and representativeness of metallurgical test work undertaken, the nature of the metallurgical domaining applied and the corresponding metallurgical recovery factors applied.

Any assumptions or allowances made for deleterious elements.

The existence of any bulk sample or pilot scale test work and the degree to which such samples are considered representative of the orebody as a whole

For minerals that are defined by a specification, has the ore reserve estimation been based on the appropriate mineralogy to meet specifications?

Rutile

Sovereign completed bulk rutile testwork programs at the globally recognised AML in Perth, Australia. The latest program was supervised by Sovereign’s Head of Development, Paul Marcos. Mr Marcos is a metallurgist and process engineer and a mineral sands industry veteran. Bulk test-work programs have confirmed premium grade rutile can be produced via a simple and conventional process flow sheet.

Processing engineering was completed by DRA Global who developed the process plant design and associated cost estimate for the Study. An average product grade of 96% TiO2 with 100% recovery to rutile product was assumed for the PFS.

Graphite

Sovereign has conducted graphite testwork across ALS Laboratory in Perth and SGS Lakefield in Canada. Veteran graphite metallurgist Oliver Peters, MSc, P.Eng., MBA (Consulting Metallurgist for SGS and Principal Metallurgist of Metpro Management Inc.) was engaged to supervise and consult on the testwork programs. Mr Peters has over 25 years’ experience in metallurgy on graphite and other commodities. He has operated numerous graphite pilot plants and commissioned a number of full-scale processing facilities.

DRA’s Senior Engineer, Stewart Calder and Manager Metallurgy, John Fleay supervised and advised on sample selection, testwork scope and results from the latest testwork programs. Both consultants are considered to have the appropriate capabilities and similarities with the material and the early stage of the project.

An average product grade of 96% Ct with 67.5% recovery to product was assumed for the PFS.

Rutile & Graphite

It is acknowledged that laboratory scale test-work will not always represent actual results achieved from a production plant in terms of grade, chemistry, sizing and recovery. Further test-work will be required to gain additional confidence of specifications and recoveries that will be achieved at full-scale production.

Overall, the process flow-sheet is conventional for both rutile and graphite with no novel features or equipment incorporated.

Environmental

 

The status of studies of potential environmental impacts of the mining and processing operation. Details of waste rock characterisation and the consideration of potential sites, status of design options considered and, where applicable, the status of approvals for process residue storage and waste dumps should be reported.

An Environmental Impact Assessment (ESIA) is currently commencing with reference to applicable Malawian and international environmental and social permitting and baseline requirements for the Kasiya Project.

Sovereign is committed to conduct its activities in full compliance to the requirements of national regulations, its obligations under international conventions and treaties and giving due consideration to international best practices and policies. Sovereign has appointed an experienced environmental consultant to manage the ESIA process, and environmental and social baseline studies have commenced with appropriately qualified independent experts. Sovereign has also completed a high-level risk assessment to identify major environmental and social risks which could affect the development of the Project, along with mitigating strategies to allow identified risks to be addressed early in the project design phase.

Sovereign has embarked on several exercises with the communities in the area and there is a general positive acceptance of the Project.

Based on the current assessments and commenced ESIA, the Competent Person believes there are no environmental issues currently identified that cannot be appropriately mitigated in accordance with standard practices adopted for the development of mining projects.

Infrastructure

The existence of appropriate infrastructure: availability of land for plant development, power, water, transportation (particularly for bulk commodities), labour, accommodation; or the ease with which the infrastructure can be provided, or accessed.

Kasiya is located approximately 40km northwest of Lilongwe, Malawi’s capital, and boasts favourable access to services and infrastructure. The proximity to Lilongwe gives the project access to a large pool of professionals and skilled tradespeople, as well as industrial services.

Sovereign appointed JCM to design a preliminary IPP solution for Kasiya. JCM is a Canada-headquartered IPP which develops, constructs, owns and operates renewable energy and storage projects in emerging markets across the globe. JCM provided an estimated, levelized cost of energy (LOCE) on a Power Purchase Agreement (PPA).

Logistics cost estimates, including rail and port infrastructure and handling, were provided by Thelo DB, Nacala Logistics and Grindrod based on market data, suppliers’ quotations, industry databases, industry contacts and the consultant’s existing knowledge of southern African transport infrastructure and freight markets.

The above consultants are independent with appropriate experience in the management of transport logistics studies in southern Africa.

Costs

The derivation of, or assumptions made, regarding projected capital costs in the study.

The methodology used to estimate operating costs.

Allowances made for the content of deleterious elements.

The derivation of assumptions made of metal or commodity price(s), for the principal minerals and co- products.

Derivation of transportation charges.

The basis for forecasting or source of treatment and refining charges, penalties for failure to meet specification, etc.

The allowances made for royalties payable, both Government and private.

Capital estimates for the procress plant have been prepared by DRA Global, together with input from Sovereign  and other contributing consultants using combinations of cost estimates from suppliers, historical data, benchmarks and other independent sources. The accuracy of the initial capital cost estimate for the Project is -20% and +25%.

Capital costs include the cost of all services, direct costs, contractor indirects, EPCM expenses, non-process infrastructure, sustaining capital and other facilities used for the mine. Capital costs make provision for mitigation expenses and mine closure and environmental costs.

Working capital requirements (including contingency) for plant commissioning and full ramp-up have been included in the headline capital estimate reported under construction, owner’s and start-up costs.

Mining costs have been estimated by Fraser Alexander, a regional leader in hydro-mining and materials handling. Mining costs have been built up from first principles based on equipment, vendor, and contractor quotations, local unit cost rates, and benchmarked costs.

Labor costs have been developed based on a first-principles build-up of staffing requirements with labor rates benchmarked in Malawi and expatriate rates benchmarked for professionals from South Africa and other jurisdictions.

A Government royalty of 5% (applied to revenue) and a vendor profit share of 2% (applied to gross profit) has been included in all project economics. A 0.45% royalty (applied to revenue) has been applied for the community development fund.

Rehabilitation and mine closure costs are included within the reported operating cost and sustaining capital estimates.

Revenue factors

The derivation of, or assumptions made regarding revenue factors including head grade, metal or commodity price(s) exchange rates, transportation and treatment charges, penalties, net smelter returns, etc.

The derivation of assumptions made of metal or commodity price(s), for the principal metals, minerals and co-products.

Sales pricing for both products is based on current market analysis by an independent party (see below)

Market assessment

The demand, supply and stock situation for the particular commodity, consumption trends and factors likely to affect supply and demand into the future.

A customer and competitor analysis along with the identification of likely market windows for the product.

Price and volume forecasts and the basis for these forecasts.

Sovereign obtained independent market assessments for both products.

Rutile

Sovereign engaged market leading TZMI to provide a bespoke marketing report to support the Study. TZMI is a global, independent consulting and publishing company which specialises in technical, strategic and commercial analyses of the opaque (non-terminal market) mineral, chemical and metal sectors.

TZMI’s assessment has confirmed that, based upon their high-level view on global demand and supply forecasts for natural rutile, and with reference to the specific attributes of Kasiya, there is a reasonable expectation that the product will be able to be sold into existing and future rutile markets.

Given the premium specifications of Kasiya’s natural rutile, the product should be suitable for all major natural end-use markets including TiO2 pigment feedstock, titanium metal and welding sectors.

Graphite

Sovereign engaged Fastmarkets, a specialist international publisher and information provider for the global steel, non-ferrous and industrial minerals markets, to prepare a marketing report for graphite.

Fastmarkets’ assessment has confirmed that based upon their high-level view on global demand and supply forecasts for natural flake graphite, and with reference to the specific attributes of Sovereign’s projects, there is a reasonable expectation that the product from Sovereign’s projects will be able to be sold into existing and future graphite markets. Given the extremely low-cost profile and high-quality product, it is expected that output from Kasiya will be able to fill new demand or substitute existing lower quality / higher cost supply.

Project considerations taken by Fastmarkets in forming an opinion about the marketability of product include:

–           Low capital costs (incremental)

–           Low operating costs

–           High quality concentrate specifications

Industry participants confirm that the highest value graphite concentrates remain the large, jumbo and super-jumbo flake fractions, primarily used in industrial applications such as refractories, foundries and expandable products. These sectors currently make up the significant majority of total global natural flake graphite market by value.

Fastmarkets have formed their opinion based solely upon project information provided by Sovereign Metals to Fastmarkets and have not conducted any independent analysis or due diligence on the information provided.

Economic

The inputs to the economic analysis to produce the net present value (NPV) in the study, the source and confidence of these economic inputs including estimated inflation, discount rate, etc

NPV ranges and sensitivity to variations in the significant assumptions and inputs.

Key parameters are disclosed in the body of the announcement, and include:

–           Life of Mine: 25 years

–           Discount rate: 8%

–           Tax rate: 30%

–           Resource Rent Tax (RRT) of 15% after tax profit

–           Royalty rate: 5% royalty (Government), 2% of gross profit (Original Project Vendor) and 0.45% Community Development Fund.

–           Pricing:  Rutile average price of US$1,484 per tonne and Graphite average basket price of US$1,290 per tonne

The PFS financial model has been prepared internally by Sovereign using inputs from the various expert consultants and has been reviewed by BDO Australia – Perth, an independent leading accountancy, tax and advisory services firm to validate the functionality and accuracy of the model.

NPV sensitivity to costs and price were assessed utilising the Project financial model developed by Sovereign. As is the case for most commodity-based projects, the NPV is most sensitive to changes in price, with a +/-30% price variation generating a           +/-60% variation in project value. It is moderately sensitive to operating cost changes, with a +/-30% cost change producing a -/+ 18% fluctuation in value. Approximately 4% of this value change is attributable to mining costs, 5% to logistics costs and the remaining 9% to processing/labour/G&A related costs. The project is less sensitive to capital cost changes, with a +/-30% variation in capital affecting NPV by -/+10%.

Social

The status of agreements with key stakeholders and matters leading to social license to operate.

Sovereign expects to enter into a Community Development Agreement (“CDA”) with the surrounding communities. Significant engagement with these communities has occurred over the exploration phases and is ongoing ahead of negotiation of the CDA which is expected to be concluded during the DFS stage.

Other

To the extent relevant, the impact of the following on the project and/or on the estimation and classification of the Ore Reserves:

Any identified material naturally occurring risks.

The status of material legal agreements and marketing arrangements.

The status of government agreements and approvals critical to the viability of the project, such as mineral tenement status and government and statutory approvals. There must be reasonable grounds to expect that all necessary Government approvals will be received within the timeframes anticipated in the Pre-Feasibility or Feasibility study. Highlight and discuss the materiality of any unresolved matter that is dependent on a third party on which extraction of the reserve is contingent.

No identifiable naturally occurring risks have been identified to impact the Kasiya Ore Reserve.

Sovereign has no existing binding offtake agreement in place.

Sovereign is yet to apply for a Mining Licence (“ML”) covering the footprint of the project, however it is not anticipated for there to be any objections in obtaining the necessary government approvals.

Classification

The basis for the classification of the Ore Reserves into varying confidence categories. Whether the result appropriately reflects the Competent Person’s view of the deposit. The proportion of Probable Ore Reserves that have been derived from Measured Mineral Resources (if any).

The Kasiya PFS Ore Reserves comprise Indicated Mineral Resource material converted to “Probable” reserves.

In line with JORC 2012 guidelines, Inferred Mineral Resource material has not been included.

100% of the Kasiya PFS Ore Reserve is in the Probable Reserves category.

Audit or reviews

The results of any audits or reviews of Ore Reserve estimates.

No external audits or reviews have been carried out to date.

 

I would like to receive Brand Communications updates and news...
Free Stock Updates & News
I agree to have my personal information transfered to MailChimp ( more information )
Join over 3.000 visitors who are receiving our newsletter and learn how to optimize your blog for search engines, find free traffic, and monetize your website.
We hate spam. Your email address will not be sold or shared with anyone else.