Home » Posts tagged 'quarterly report'

Tag Archives: quarterly report

Salt Lake Potash (SO4) December 2018 Quarterly Report and Appendix 5B

The Board of Salt Lake Potash Limited (the Company or Salt Lake Potash) is pleased to present its Quarterly Report for the period ending 31 December 2018.

The Company is focussed on rapidly progressing the development of its Lake Way Project, intended to be the first salt-lake brine Sulphate of Potash (SOP) production operation in Australia.

Highlights for the quarter and subsequently include:

Native Title Land Access and Exploration Agreement Executed for Lake Way

Ø Salt Lake Potash and Tarlka Matuwa Piarku (Aboriginal Corporation) RNTBC (TMPAC) have entered into a Native Title Land Access and Exploration Agreement for Lake Way

Ø TMPAC consent has been received for the on-lake construction of the pond system for the dewatering of the Williamson Pit at Lake Way (Williamson Ponds)

Key Approval Obtained and Construction of Williamson Ponds Imminent

Ø Mining Proposal and Project Management Plans for the Williamson Ponds approved by the Department of Mines, Industry Regulation and Safety (DMIRS)

Ø Initial fleet of construction equipment mobilised to Lake Way and site preparation works being undertaken in preparation for imminent construction of the Williamson Ponds

Ø Detailed design of Williamson Ponds completed

‘Whole of Lake’ Resource Program for Lake Way Advancing

Ø Work well advanced to enable the Company to report:

  • o   a Mineral Resource Estimate for the lake bed brine and the paleochannel aquifer for the 100% owned Salt Lake tenements
  • o   upgraded Mineral Resource Estimate for the Blackham tenements

Ø ‘Whole of Lake’ Mineral Resource Estimate will enable the Company to examine larger production scenarios

Field Trials at Lake Way Confirm Salt Production Process

Ø Comprehensive field evaporation trials at Lake Way are successfully producing substantial volumes of potassium Harvest Salts validating the modelled salt production process. 

Ø Field evaporation trials have produced over 2 tonnes of high grade Harvest Salts at Lake Way.

Ø Over 100,000l of brine from both high grade Lake Way playa brine and the super high-grade Williamson Pit brine have been extracted for the field trial and evaporated separately. Both brines have rapidly produced quality harvest salts amenable for conversion to Sulphate of Potash (SOP).

Ø Potassium Harvest Salts produced from the field trial will be processed at Saskatchewan Research Council (SRC), where a pilot plant will duplicate and refine the Lake Way process flow sheet, as well as producing further product samples for offtake partners.

Key Appointments Enhance Senior Project Development Team

Ø Highly regarded mining executive Tony Swiericzuk commenced as Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer of Salt Lake Potash effective 5 November 2018

Ø Three proven mining executives join Salt Lake Potash as leaders in the project development team:

o   Peter Cardillo as Project Director – Processing and NPI

o   Lloyd Edmunds as Project Director – Civil

o   Stephen Cathcart as Project Director – Technical

Ø These appointments, along with other recent additions to the project execution team, bring diversified technical/studies, approvals, construction, operations, process infrastructure experience to the Company as it moves into rapid project development phase

Completion of A$13.0 Million Placement to Fund Activities at Lake Way

Ø The Company completed placement of 31.0 million new shares to raise gross proceeds of $13.0 million

Ø The Placement included 950,000 shares subscribed for by CEO, Mr Tony Swiericzuk, and 750,000 shares subscribed for by the Company’s Chairman, Mr Ian Middlemas

Ø The proceeds have enabled the Company to accelerate planned development activities at Lake Way, including mobilisation of construction equipment for the imminent construction of the Williamson Ponds and dewatering of the Williamson Pit

 

OVERVIEW

Salt Lake Potash is the owner of nine large salt lakes in the Northern Goldfields Region of Western Australia.  This outstanding portfolio of assets has a number of important, favourable characteristics:

·    Over 3,300km2 of playa surface, with in-situ clays suitable for low cost on-lake pond construction;

·    Very large paleochannel hosted brine aquifers, with chemistry amenable to evaporation of salts for SOP production, extractable from both low-cost trenches and deeper bores;

·    Excellent evaporation conditions;

·    Excellent access to transport, energy and other infrastructure in the Goldfields mining district;

·    Clear opportunity to reduce transport costs by developing lakes closer to infrastructure and by capturing economies of scale; and

·    Potential for multi-lake production offers optionality and significant scale potential, operational flexibility, cost advantages and risk mitigation from localised weather events.

Salt Lake Potash’s immediate focus is on the rapid development of the Lake Way Project, intended to be the first salt-lake brine Sulphate of Potash (SOP) production operation in Australia. Lake Way’s location and logistical advantages make it the ideal location for the Company’s first SOP operation.

The Company’s long term plan is to develop an integrated SOP operation, producing from a number (or all) of the lakes.  Salt Lake Potash will progressively explore each of the lakes with a view to estimating resources for each Lake, and determining the development potential. Exploration of the lakes will be prioritised based on likely transport costs, scale, permitting pathway and brine chemistry.

 

LAKE WAY PROJECT

Lake Way is located in the Northern Goldfields Region of Western Australia, less than 15km south of Wiluna. The surface area of the Lake is over 270km2.

Salt Lake Potash holds five Exploration Licences (one granted and four under application) covering most of Lake Way and select areas off-lake, including the paleochannel defined by previous exploration. The northern end of the Lake is largely covered by a number of Mining Leases, held by Blackham Resources Limited (Blackham), the owner of the Wiluna Gold Mine.

The Company’s Memorandum of Understanding with Blackham (see ASX Announcement dated 12 March 2018) allows for an expedited path to development at Lake Way.

Lake Way has a number of compelling advantages which make it an ideal site for Salt Lake Potash’s initial SOP operation, including:

Ø     Utilisation of Blackham’s existing infrastructure (including camps, power and maintenance) to accelerate development.

Ø     The site has excellent freight solutions, being adjacent to the Goldfields Highway, which is permitted for heavy haulage, quad trailer road trains to the railhead at Leonora and then direct rail access to both Esperance and Fremantle Ports, or via other heavy haulage roads to Geraldton Port.

Ø       The Goldfields Gas Pipeline is adjacent to Salt Lake Potash’s tenements, running past the eastern side of the Lake.

Ø        Access to Blackham’s existing Mining Leases provides advanced permitting pathway for early development activity, including the construction of the Williamson Ponds.

Ø        Salt Lake Potash will construct the Williamson Ponds and dewater the existing Williamson Pit on Lake Way. The pit contains an estimated 1.2GL of brine at the exceptional grade of 25kg/m3 of SOP. This brine is the ideal starter feed for evaporation ponds, having already evaporated from the normal Lake Way brine grade, which averages over 14kg/m3.

Ø     The high grade brines at Lake Way will result in lower capital and operating costs due to lower extraction and evaporation requirements.

Ø      The presence of clays in the upper levels of the lake which are amenable to low cost, on-lake evaporation pond construction.

The Company is concurrently progressing the imminent construction of the Williamson Ponds, whilst also rapidly advancing a ‘whole of lake’ scenario, including mineral resource estimates, permitting and approvals, pilot plant process testwork and assessment of infrastructure and logistical options.

A number of key appointments have been made during the Quarter that support the rapid development of the Lake Way Project, bringing diversified technical, construction, operations, process infrastructure experience to the Company, including:

·    Peter Cardillo as Project Director – Processing and NPI

·    Lloyd Edmunds as Project Director – Civil

·    Stephen Cathcart as Project Director – Technical

Salt Lake Potash has also engaged industry leading consultants to work alongside the Company’s internal experts for works related to the larger ‘whole of lake’ development of the Lake Way Project, including:

·    WOOD – technical studies for a full scale commercial project  

·    Pendragon – environmental consultant

·    Ad-Infinitum – pond process design

·    Knight Piesold – Williamson Pond detailed design

·    Cardno – on playa trench hydraulics  

·    SRC – process testwork and pilot plant

·    Global groundwater – bore test pumping

·    Hydrogeoenviro – bore water licensing

Having completed a placement to raise $13.0 million during the quarter and built a team with capability and track record of successfully developing and constructing numerous resource projects, the Company is well placed to take advantage of the benefits of the Lake Way Project and its broader portfolio of nine salt lakes.

Discussions are also ongoing with a number of offtake partners and the testwork currently underway at SRC will provide high-grade SOP product samples for testing by these partners.

Native Title Land Access and Exploration Agreement

In December 2018, the Company signed a Native Title Land Access and Brine Minerals Exploration Agreement (the Agreement) with Tarlka Matuwa Piarku (Aboriginal Corporation) RNTBC (TMPAC) covering the Lake Way Project area.

TMPAC entered into the Agreement with Salt Lake Potash on behalf of the Wiluna People who are the recognised Native Title Holders of the land covering the Lake Way Project area. TMPAC also provided consent for the total area required for the construction and operation of the Williamson Ponds.

The signing of the Agreement with TMPAC and receipt of TMPAC’s consent for the Williamson Ponds is a major milestone in the development of the Lake Way Project and positions Salt Lake Potash to accelerate the works program for the Williamson Ponds.

Approvals Advancing

The Company’s Mining Proposal and Project Management Plans for the Williamson Ponds were approved by Department of Mines, Industry Regulation and Safety (DMIRS) during the quarter, and a Works Approval licence was also submitted to the Department of Water and Environmental Regulation (DWER). These works include the construction of operational scale evaporation ponds and associated infrastructure including pond trenching to provide brine conditioning to manage the brine extracted from the Williamson Pit.

Salt Lake Potash has previously received environmental approval from the DMIRS to construct ponds totalling up to 133Ha (the Williamson Ponds), as well as ancillary infrastructure.

The Williamson Ponds will be the first operational scale SOP evaporation ponds built on a salt lake in Australia – an important part of the staged de-risking and development at Lake Way and across the Company’s portfolio of salt lakes in the Northern Goldfields Region.

A series of studies commenced during the quarter in support of the ongoing environmental approvals. These include flora and fauna surveys, climatology and hydrologic assessment, flood modelling and geotechnical investigations.

Mineral Resource Program

The Company has previously reported a Mineral Resource Estimate for Lake Way (Blackham tenements only). Work progressed during the quarter to enable the Company to estimate a ‘whole of lake’ Mineral Resource Estimate, including the remaining playa surface covered by Salt Lake Potash’s tenements and the paleochannel aquifer, which were not considered as part of the initial Mineral Resource estimate and provide significant short term upside to increase resources at Lake Way.

Estimation of a ‘whole of lake’ resources will enable the Company to consider larger production scenarios for Lake Way.

A program of 19 auger holes, test pits, trench testing, recovery testing, brine sampling and laboratory determination of hydraulic parameters has commenced and is expected to be completed in the current quarter. Results of these activities will provide inputs to the Mineral Resource Estimate for the playa surface.

Planning and initial works also commenced on defining the paleochannel resource under Lake Way. 

By taking advantage of previous works in the area, the Company was able to identify and inspect three existing production bores drilled into the paleochannel.  Each of the holes was inspected by downhole camera which showed that all three remain intact and, with some minor cleaning and redevelopment, are expected to be suitable for test pumping.  Rehabilitation and test pumping is planned for the current quarter, and the results of this activity are expected to confirm the hydraulic parameters of the productive zone of the paleochannel and the brine grade.  The data produced from the test pumping will be used as an input to the Mineral Resource Estimate for the paleochannel.

A gravity and passive seismic geophysical survey consisting of 22 lines and a total coverage of greater than 110 km was commissioned to define the location and form of the Lake Way paleochannel within the Salt Lake Potash and Blackham tenements.  The work consists of a number of cross sections which are then combined to provide a 3D representation of the paleochannel.  This work will be completed in the current quarter.  When combined with the geological logs from previous work it is expected to be possible to define the extent of the brine hosting sediments and develop a volumetric understanding of the paleochannel, which in turn will inform the resource model.

Civil Construction – On-Lake Infrastructure

During the quarter, the Company progressed the first phase of on-lake development with completion of the detailed design of the Williamson Ponds to dewater the high grade Williamson Pit brine. This early works program will allow the fast-tracking of harvest salts in readiness for process plant commissioning.

Detailed engineering works during the quarter for the Williamson Ponds included further analysis of strength and permeability characteristics of lakebed sediments, and geotechnical parameters for final pond analysis and design. Other geotechnical design work undertaken included Cone Penetration Test (CPT) data analysis, trafficability assessment, access road analysis, seepage models, borrow pit assessments and development of the pond construction methodology. The geotechnical investigation and engineering works will expand in the current quarter for the larger ‘whole of lake’ scenario at Lake Way.

Surveying contractor, AAM Group set out the Williamson Pond design in readiness for construction commencement in the current quarter, and also commenced the Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) topographical survey flyover for the larger ‘whole of lake’ scenario.

Given the unique design and site conditions, the Company is now engaging with the specialist civil contracting market to select our contracting partners to build the on lake Williamson Ponds and dewater the Williamson Pit. In late December 2018, the Company mobilised initial construction equipment to Lake Way, with site preparation works being undertaken in preparation of the imminent construction of the Williamson Ponds.

The Company has also sort Expressions of Interest (EOI) from key civil contractors to participate in an Early Contractor Involvement (ECI) process for the larger ‘whole of lake’ development. To date, the Company has received positive feedback and acceptance from a number of major civil contractors.

Process Testwork

Comprehensive field evaporation trials at Lake Way are continuing to successfully produce substantial volumes of potassium Harvest Salts validating the modelled salt production process.

A major component of the feasibility study process for the Lake Way Project is to develop a brine evaporation and salt production model based on the brine chemistry of both Lake Way playa and Williamson Pit brines under local environmental (evaporation) conditions.

Initially, this model was based on a computer simulation generated by international brine processing experts Ad Infinitum, from known brine chemistry (from assays) and comprehensive public weather datasets. In this case the model was also informed by the Company’s unique database of more than 18 months of field evaporation trials at Lake Wells, reflecting similar chemistry and environmental inputs.

In the second stage of the model development the computer simulation was calibrated against and updated for the results of wind tunnel evaporation tests of Lake Way brines under laboratory conditions.

Thirdly, the model is now being further refined by establishing a site evaporation trial, where a scaled down version of an evaporation pond system is established on site and brine is evaporated under actual field conditions. Both brine chemistry and salt production are closely monitored.

The Lake Way Site Evaporation Trial (SET) was established in May/June 2018 and initial brine feed was gradually introduced from both the Williamson Pit (SOP resource grade 25kg/m3) and the Lake Way playa (SOP resource grade 14kg/m3) (refer to Note 1 for mineral resource estimate on Blackham tenements). 

Over 100,000 litres of Williamson Pit and the Lake Way Playa brine has been fed into the SET pond system to date. Brine is sourced from a surface trench, for the Lake Way Playa brine, or direct from the Williamson Pit and introduced into a Halite Pond. As solar evaporation concentrates the brine, it progresses through a series of 5 ponds: two halite salt ponds, and then schoenite, kainite and carnallite salt ponds.

Harvested salt and brine samples are analysed at regular intervals through the evaporation process to gather data for model correlation. To date over 400 samples have been extracted and assayed at Bureau Veritas in Perth.

The results from the Lake Way SET to date demonstrate an excellent correlation to the salt production model.

This provides the Company with a very strong basis to continue development of the mass balance model and process flow sheet for the Lake Way Project.

It was found that halite salts begin to form almost immediately upon initial evaporation. This will shorten the overall salt production timeframe for the Williamson Pit brine. It may also offer the opportunity for faster construction of harvest pond infrastructure, utilising harvested halite salts for pavement. 

The Lake Way SET has already produced over 2 tonnes of Potassium Harvest Salts (1.8 tonnes Lake Way Playa and 0.4 tonnes of Williamson Pit) and a further 5 tonnes are forecast to be harvested during ongoing evaporation trials.

From the test work to date, the Williamson Pit and the Lake Way Playa brines have produced excellent high grade Harvest Potassium Salts with an exceptional K grade of up to 10% and an overall high average K grade of 6.8%. This aligns very well with the grades that were observed during the Lake Wells SET’s.

This provides the Company with confidence that the Lake Way production model, process flowsheet and Harvest Salt product will produce a final high grade SOP product in line with the world leading SOP product of 53% K2O produced at Lake Wells.

The Company has engaged the world’s leading potash processing laboratory, Saskatchewan Research Council (SRC), to establish a pilot plant based on the process flow sheet for the Lake Way Project. The initial batch of harvest salts from Lake Way has been delivered to SRC and testwork is underway.

The pilot plant will validate and refine the Lake Way process flowsheet and also produce high-grade SOP product samples for offtake partners.

LAKE BALLARD

The Lake Ballard Project is located about 15 km north of Menzies. The playa is a significant regional landform with a surface area of 698km2. The geology of Lake Ballard is similar to that encountered at other lakes in the Company’s portfolio.   

Surface Aquifer Exploration Program

Final elements of fieldwork undertaken to enable the estimation of a resource were completed at Lake Ballard during the quarter. 

The Company commenced an auger drilling program in September 2018 to obtain insitu samples for geological logging, porosity measurement, specific yield testing and brine sampling. The holes were drilled using a track mounted auger rig, capable of drilling to between 15 – 20m depth depending on ground conditions.

Drilling was completed, with a total of 15 auger holes, from which 47 insitu samples from depths varying from 1m to 15m.

The core samples were collected and sent to Core Laboratories WA for analysis of hydraulic conductivity, total porosity and drainable porosity (Specific yield).

The Company also test pumped two trenches for 15 days and analysed data from the test pumping of 44 trial pits.

Results of the auger program and insitu sampling are in accordance with expectation and reported in full in Appendix 2.

The test pumping and trial pit data were analysed using known methodologies with the AQTESOLV analysis programme. This data will ultimately feed into a mineral resource estimate for the majority of the lake.

LAKE MINIGWAL

The Lake Minigwal Project is located in the Northern Goldfields Region of Western Australia approximately 80km south east of Laverton. 

During the quarter extensive gravity geophysics was run over the various branches of Lake Minigwal as a preliminary investigation into the depth to basement and location of the paleochannel.

The purpose of the gravity survey was twofold, to identify the depth to basement across the lake and to identify the thalweg of the paleochannel as a precurser to the development of a drilling programme.

Whilst there is confidence that the main trunk drainage of the paleochannel passes beneath the Company’s tenements and that a large paleo-tributary that enters from the north and merges with the main trunk drainage beneath the eastern third of Lake Minigwal, the exact location is currently unknown.

The results are currently being processed, however preliminary analysis has identified the Thalweg of the paleochannel.  Further modelling will be undertaken to refine the data response and to identify future areas for greater density of surveys.

SOP SAMPLE PRODUCTION

During the quarter, the Company completed confirmatory testwork at Fremantle Metallurgy’s mineral processing laboratory. The testwork, conducted by the Company’s process engineers, began the process of converting several tonnes of harvest salts collected from the Lake Wells SET into SOP samples.  The process and equipment used was based upon the flowsheet previously tested by SRC.

The in-house work successfully tested some of the discrete unit operations in the flowsheet and generated a small amount of lake-derived SOP product for assessment of quality. The testwork has provided valuable inputs into the process flowsheet development and equipment selection for the Lake Way harvest salt testwork now underway at SRC. Importantly, the operation also provided the Company’s process team valuable hands-on experience in dealing with the subtle complexities in the operation of a saturated salt-brine process.    

CORPORATE

During the quarter, the Company completed a placement to existing and new institutional and sophisticated investors in Australia and overseas for 31.0 million new ordinary shares of the Company, to raise gross proceeds of $13,000,000 (Placement). There was very strong demand for the Placement, an endorsement of the recent appointment of Tony Swiericzuk as CEO and also of the Company’s world class Sulphate of Potash project.

The cornerstone investor for the Placement was a significant international investment fund. Directors and senior management subscribed for a total of 2.4 million shares in the Placement, including 950,000 shares by the CEO, Mr Tony Swiericzuk, and 750,000 shares by the Company’s Chairman, Mr Ian Middlemas, which were issued in January 2019 following shareholder approval.

Proceeds from the Placement are being used to fund construction of the Williamson Ponds and dewatering of the Williamson Pit, as well as ongoing development of on-lake infrastructure, exploration and feasibility studies, and general working capital.

Having successfully raised the funds for project development at Lake Way, the Company significantly accelerated its activity and expenditure during the December quarter.

 

Note 1: Lake Way Mineral Resource Estimate (Blackham tenements only) 

Sediment Hosted Brine – Indicated (94%)

Playa Area

Lakebed Sediment Volume

Brine Concentration

Mineral Tonnage Calculated from Total Porosity

Mineral Tonnage Calculated from Drainable Porosity

K

Mg

SO4

Total Porosity

Brine Volume

SOP Tonnage

Drainable Porosity

Brine Volume

SOP Tonnage

(km2)

(Mm3)

(kg/m3)

(kg/m3)

(Kg/m3)

(Mm3)

(kt)

(Mm3)

(kt)

55.4

290

6.9

28.3

0.43

125

1,900

0.11

31.9

490

 

Williamson Pit Brine – Measured (6%)

Brine Volume (Mm3)

Potassium Conc.   (kg/m3)

Magnesium Conc.   (kg/m3)

Sulphate Conc.  

(kg/m3)

SOP Tonnage (kt)

1.26

11.4

14.47

48

32

Work is currently underway to enable the Company to report a Mineral Resource Estimate for the lake bed brine and the paleochannel aquifer for the ‘whole of lake’, which will enable the Company to examine larger production scenarios.

 

For further information please visit www.saltlakepotash.com.au or contact:

 

Tony Swiericzuk/Clint McGhie

Salt Lake Potash Limited

Tel: +61 8 9322 6322

Jo Battershill

Salt Lake Potash Limited

Tel: +44 (0) 20 7478 3900

Colin Aaronson/Richard Tonthat/Ben Roberts

Grant Thornton UK LLP (Nominated Adviser)

Tel: +44 (0) 20 7383 5100

Derrick Lee/Beth McKiernan

Cenkos Securities plc (Joint Broker)

Tel: +44 (0) 131 220 6939

Jerry Keen/Toby Gibbs

Shore Capital (Joint Broker)

Tel: +44 (0) 20 7468 7967

 

Competent Persons Statement

The information in this announcement that relates to Exploration Results for Lake Ballard is based on information compiled by Mr Ben Jeuken, who is a member Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy and a member of the International Association of Hydrogeologists. Mr Jeuken is employed by Groundwater Science Pty Ltd, an independent consulting company. Mr Jeuken has sufficient experience, which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity, which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Mr Jeuken consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.

The information in this announcement that relates to Process Testwork Results is extracted from the report entitled ‘Field Trials at Lake Way Confirm Salt Production Process’ dated 29 January 2019. This announcement is available to view on www.saltlakepotash.com.au. The information in the original ASX Announcement that related to Process Testwork Results was based on, and fairly represents, information compiled by Mr Bryn Jones, BAppSc (Chem), MEng (Mining) who is a Fellow of the AusIMM. Mr Jones is a Director of Salt Lake Potash Limited. Mr Jones has sufficient experience, which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking, to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Salt Lake Potash Limited confirms that it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in the original market announcement. Salt Lake Potash Limited confirms that the form and context in which the Competent Person’s findings are presented have not been materially modified from the original market announcement.

The information in this Announcement that relates to Mineral Resources is extracted from the report entitled ‘Scoping Study for Low Capex, High Margin Demonstration Plant at Lake Way’ dated 31 July 2018. This announcement is available to view on www.saltlakepotash.com.au. The information in the original ASX Announcement that related to Mineral Resources was based on, and fairly represents, information compiled by Mr Ben Jeuken, who is a member Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy and a member of the International Association of Hydrogeologists. Mr Jeuken is employed by Groundwater Science Pty Ltd, an independent consulting company. Mr Jeuken has sufficient experience, which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity, which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Salt Lake Potash Limited confirms that it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in the original market announcement and, in the case of estimates of Mineral Resources, that all material assumptions and technical parameters underpinning the estimates in the relevant market announcement continue to apply and have not materially changed. Salt Lake Potash Limited confirms that the form and context in which the Competent Person’s findings are presented have not been materially modified from the original market announcement.

Appendix 1 – Summary of Exploration and Mining Tenements

As at 31 December 2018, the Company holds interests in the following tenements:

 

Project

Status

Type of Change

License Number

Interest (%)

1-Oct-18

Interest (%)

31-Dec-18

Western Australia

Lake Way

Central

Granted

E53/1878

100%

100%

East

Application

Application

E53/2057

100%

South

Application

E53/1897

100%

100%

South

Application

Application

E53/2059

100%

South

Application

Application

E53/2060

100%

Lake Wells

Central

Granted

E38/2710

100%

100%

South

Granted

E38/2821

100%

100%

North

Granted

E38/2824

100%

100%

Outer East

Granted

E38/3055

100%

100%

Single Block

Granted

E38/3056

100%

100%

Outer West

Granted

E38/3057

100%

100%

North West

Granted

E38/3124

100%

100%

West

Granted

L38/262

100%

100%

East

Granted

L38/263

100%

100%

South West

Granted

L38/264

100%

100%

South

Granted

L38/287

100%

100%

South Western

Granted

E38/3247

100%

100%

South

Granted

M38/1278

100%

100%

Lake Ballard

West

Granted

E29/912

100%

100%

East

Granted

E29/913

100%

100%

North

Granted

E29/948

100%

100%

South

Granted

E29/958

100%

100%

South East

Granted

E29/1011

100%

100%

South East

Granted

E29/1020

100%

100%

South East

Granted

E29/1021

100%

100%

South East

Granted

E29/1022

100%

100%

Lake Irwin

West

Granted

E37/1233

100%

100%

Central

Granted

E39/1892

100%

100%

East

Granted

E38/3087

100%

100%

North

Granted

E37/1261

100%

100%

Central East

Granted

E38/3113

100%

100%

South

Granted

E39/1955

100%

100%

North West

Granted

E37/1260

100%

100%

South West

Granted

E39/1956

100%

100%

Lake Minigwal

West

Granted

E39/1893

100%

100%

East

Granted

E39/1894

100%

100%

Central

Granted

E39/1962

100%

100%

Central East

Granted

E39/1963

100%

100%

South

Granted

E39/1964

100%

100%

South West

Granted

E39/1965

100%

100%

Lake Marmion

North

Granted

E29/1000

100%

100%

Central

Granted

E29/1001

100%

100%

South

Granted

E29/1002

100%

100%

West

Granted

E29/1005

100%

100%

Lake Noondie

North

Granted

E57/1062

100%

100%

Central

Granted

E57/1063

100%

100%

South

Granted

E57/1064

100%

100%

West

Granted

E57/1065

100%

100%

East

Granted

E36/932

100%

100%

Lake Barlee

North

Granted

E30/495

100%

100%

Central

Granted

E30/496

100%

100%

South

Granted

E77/2441

100%

100%

Lake Raeside

North

Granted

E37/1305

100%

100%

Lake Austin

North

Application

E21/205

100%

100%

West

Application

E21/206

100%

100%

East

Application

E58/529

100%

100%

South

Application

E58/530

100%

100%

South West

Application

E58/531

100%

100%

Lake Moore

Granted

Granted

E59/2344

100%

Northern Territory

Lake Lewis

South

Granted

EL 29787

100%

100%

North

Granted

EL 29903

100%

100%

 

 

Appendix 2 – Lake Ballard Auger and Test Pit Results

Table 1: Auger Hole and Shelby Tube Porosity and Effective Porosity Results

HoleID

Sample From

Sample To

Auger Core

Total Porosity

(% v/v)

Shelby Tube

Total Porosity

(% v/v)

Auger Core

Drainable Porosity (% v/v)

Shelby Tube

Drainable Porosity (% v/v)

LBAG001

1

2

44.2

10

LBAG001

3

4

49.8

12

LBAG001

6

7

44

9

LBAG001

11

12

LBAG002

1

2

46.6

8

LBAG002

2

3

49.7

11

LBAG002

5

6

57.4

15

LBAG002

7

8

LBAG002

9.5

10

35

8

LBAG003

1

52.6

12

LBAG003

2

3

53.4

14

LBAG003

4

5

51.8

11

LBAG003

8

9

37.8

8

LBAG003

11

12

52.4

13

LBAG003

12

13

42.2

11

LBAG004

1

2

48.6

14

LBAG004

4

5

51.4

11

LBAG004

7

8

47.7

12

LBAG004

9

10

43.4

10

LBAG004

12

13

48.3

11

LBAG005

2.2

2.5

64.5

17

LBAG005

4

5

43.1

11

LBAG005

7

8

49.3

9

LBAG005

9

10

48.2

9

LBAG005

12

13

51.2

11

LBAG006A

1

2

33.7

8

LBAG006A

3

4

26.7

12

LBAG006B

2

3

42.1

15

LBAG006B

8

9

41.9

8

LBAG007A

2

3

33.3

11

LBAG007B

2

3

59.1

17

LBAG007C

2

3

42.9

14

LBAG008

1

2

57.6

13

LBAG008

4

5

64.4

14

LBAG008

7

8

32.7

11

LBAG008

9

10

43.3

9

LBAG009A

2

3

26

13

LBAG009B

1

2

32.6

18

LBAG010

2

2.5

47.3

14

LBAG010

6

7

36

9

LBAG010

10

11

30

9

LBAG011

2

3

36.5

14

LBAG011

4

5

52.6

11

LBAG011

6

7

64.9

11

LBAG011

9

10

41.1

11

LBAG011

11

12

47.4

11

LBAG011

12

13

45.9

11

LBTT121

1

52.5

13

LBTT121

2

60.1

15

LBTT121

3

35.2

7

LBTT121

4

43.1

12

LBTT144

0.5

1

55.8

12

LBTT144

1.5

2

58.2

13

LBTT144

2.5

3

45.4

5

LBTT155

0.5

1

59.9

11

LBTT155

1.5

2

38.5

4

LBTT155

2.5

3

26.7

6

LBTT192

0.5

1

37.0

19

LBTT192

1

1.5

28.0

13

LBTT192

2

2.5

42.9

19

LBTT192

3

3.5

34.6

18

LBTT189

0

2

45.5

14

 

Table 2: Location Details for Auger Holes

Hole ID

Easting

Northing

Depth (m)

LBAG001

319177

6731097

12.7

LBAG002

318517

6731243

10.8

LBAG003

315539

6733652

13.0

LBAG004

311947

6733975

13.5

LBAG005

307467

6735256

14.5

LBAG006A

303547

6733253

5.0

LBAG006B

304066

6733890

9.0

LBAG007A

301092

6737570

4.5

LBAG007B

300749

6937786

4.0

LBAG007C

300443

6737940

3.0

LBAG008

303139

6739647

10.0

LBAG009A

299465

6741072

4.0

LBAG009A

299174

6741053

4.5

LBAG010

294859

6741331

11.0

LBAG011

290355

6741953

15.0

Note: All holes are vertical, with an RL of approximately 370m.  Depth indicates end of hole.

 

Table 3: Location Details for Test Pits

HoleID

Easting

Northing

HoleID

Easting

Northing

HoleID

Easting

Northing

LBTT011

324848

6734075

LBTT075

318810

6731492

LBTT143

312850

6735049

LBTT014

324869

6734673

LBTT076

318936

6731596

LBTT144

312822

6734850

LBTT015

324875

6734875

LBTT077

319077

6731719

LBTT145

312797

6734660

LBTT016

324648

6734154

LBTT078

319224

6731844

LBTT149

313340

6733847

LBTT017

324447

6734155

LBTT079

319344

6731947

LBTT150

313323

6733652

LBTT018

324250

6734155

LBTT080

319491

6732075

LBTT156

313143

6732468

LBTT019

324047

6734155

LBTT081

319626

6732190

LBTT161

311165

6737839

LBTT020

323847

6734155

LBTT082

319787

6732309

LBTT162

311016

6735825

LBTT021

323650

6734155

LBTT083

319908

6732429

LBTT164

311995

6734079

LBTT022

323447

6734155

LBTT084

320056

6732555

LBTT165

308329

6738318

LBTT023

323249

6734154

LBTT087

320625

6733158

LBTT166

307463

6735246

LBTT024

323047

6734155

LBTT099

316105

6731412

LBTT169

307397

6731029

LBTT025

323838

6734261

LBTT100

316051

6731653

LBTT170

304632

6730314

LBTT026

323839

6734212

LBTT101

315997

6731866

LBTT171

300652

6730490

LBTT027

323845

6734107

LBTT103

315997

6731866

LBTT172

303546

6733252

LBTT028

323847

6734054

LBTT105

315815

6732626

LBTT173

306038

6733728

LBTT030

322735

6730202

LBTT106

315764

6732827

LBTT174

305593

6736408

LBTT031

322531

6730201

LBTT107

315704

6733021

LBTT175

306265

6737846

LBTT038

321137

6730178

LBTT109

315603

6733390

LBTT176

300602

6734536

LBTT043

320136

6730166

LBTT110

315538

6733588

LBTT177

298528

6738100

LBTT045

319738

6730151

LBTT112

315395

6733959

LBTT179

295300

6743180

LBTT046

320132

6730100

LBTT113

315314

6734154

LBTT180

290882

6743418

LBTT047

320136

6730206

LBTT114

315240

6734314

LBTT181

298362

6736492

LBTT050

318601

6728705

LBTT115

316375

6734039

LBTR004

318513

6731366

LBTT053

319201

6728663

LBTT116

316521

6734168

LBTR007

315240

6734314

LBTT054

319406

6728628

LBTT119

316962

6734577

LBTT055

319603

6728608

LBTT123

317399

6734975

LBTT056

319804

6728588

LBTT124

317694

6732520

LBTT057

320003

6728568

LBTT125

317839

6735385

LBTT058

320209

6728546

LBTT126

317986

6735519

LBTT059

320404

6728525

LBTT127

318137

6735660

LBTT060

320604

6728506

LBTT128

318282

6735794

LBTT061

320800

6728486

LBTT129

318428

6735928

LBTT063

321301

6728433

LBTT131

313153

6737408

LBTT064

321502

6728412

LBTT132

313132

6737224

LBTT065

321703

6728389

LBTT133

313105

6737027

LBTT068

319222

6730192

LBTT134

313082

6736829

LBTT071

318604

6730200

LBTT135

313051

6736634

LBTT072

318364

6731106

LBTT136

313029

6736432

LBTT073

318513

6731235

LBTT137

313004

6736240

LBTT074

318664

6731366

LBTT142

312874

6735244

 

 

APPENDIX 3 – JORC TABLE ONE

Section 1: Sampling Techniques and Data

Criteria

JORC Code explanation

Commentary

Sampling techniques

Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels, random chips, or specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling.

Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used.

Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public Report.

In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has been done this would be relatively simple (eg ‘reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay’). In other cases more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (eg submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information.

Sampling involved the excavation of test pits over the tenement area to a depth of up to 6mbgl or weathered basement whichever was encountered first.  Two trenches were also dug to 3.5m depth.

 

A brine sample and duplicate were taken from each test pit and trench for analysis.

 

Samples were taken manually by initially rinsing out the bottle with brine from the pit or trench and then placing the bottle in the test pit or trench and allowing it to fill.

Samples were analysed for K, Mg, Ca, Na, Cl, SO4, HCO3, NO3, pH, TDS and specific gravity.

 

Each test pit was geologically logged and a sample taken each 1m depth.

 

Test pumping entailed pumping from the trenches and test pits using a diesel driven submersible pump coupled to a level switch.

 

Water levels in the piezometer, test pits and trenches were logged manually and by pressure transducer.

Drilling techniques

Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (eg core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc).

Hollow-stem auger holes drilled to basement or refusal, up to 15m. Core was collected from surface, geologically logged, sampled and set for lab analysis for porosity.

 

Once completed brine samples also taken from the open hole

 

Test pits were dug with an excavator

 

Drill sample recovery

Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries and results assessed.

Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure representative nature of the samples. Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material.

Samples from the test pits were logged each bucket and a representative sample bagged.

 

100% of excavated sample was available for sampling.  The ability to see the bulk sample facilitated the selection of a representative sample.

 

There is no relationship between sample recovery and grade and no loss of material as a result of excavation.

 

Logging

Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies.

Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc) photography.

The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged.

The geological logging is sufficient for the purposes of identifying variations in sand/ clay and silt fraction within the top 6m.  For a brine abstraction project, the key parameters are the hydraulic conductivity and storativity of the host rock, which will be determined during test pumping of the trenches.

 

The logging is qualitative.

 

The entire pit depth was logged in every case.

 

Sub-sampling techniques and sample preparation

If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core taken.

If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc and whether sampled wet or dry.

For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample preparation technique.

Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages to maximise representivity of samples.

Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in situ material collected, including for instance results for field duplicate/second-half sampling.

Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being sampled.

Whole core taken.

 

Not applicable, core drilling.

 

At all test pits brine samples were taken from the pit after 24hours or once the pit had filled with brine.  The brine samples taken from the pits are bulk samples which is an appropriate approach given the long-term abstraction technique of using many kilometres of trenches to abstract brine.

 

All the samples taken were incorporated into a QA / QC program in which Standards and Duplicates were taken. The samples were taken in sterile plastic bottles of 250ml capacity.

Excavated lake bed samples were sealed in plastic bags.  For all brine samples (original or check samples) the samples were labelled with the alphanumeric code B800001, B800002 …

 

Lake bed samples were labelled with the test pit locator LBTT01, LBTT02 etc. and the depth from which they were taken.

 

Quality of assay data and laboratory tests

The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or total.

For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc, the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc.

Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (ie lack of bias) and precision have been established.

The brine samples were sent to Bureau Veritas Laboratories in Perth, WA with the duplicates being held by Salt Lake Potash.  Every 10th duplicate was sent to Intertek, an alternate laboratory for comparison purposes.

 

No laboratory analysis was undertaken with geophysical tools.

 

Soil samples and laboratory derived hydraulic conductivity, total porosity and drainable porosity samples were analysed by Core Laboratories in Perth WA.  All laboratories used are NATA certified.

 

Verification of sampling and assaying

The verification of significant intersections by either independent or alternative company personnel.

The use of twinned holes.

Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols.

Discuss any adjustment to assay data.

Not applicable, no significant intersections, no verification required.

 

No twin holes were drilled.

 

All sampling and assaying is well documented and contained on Salt Lake Potash’s internal database

 

No adjustments have been made to assay data

Location of data points

Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource estimation.

Specification of the grid system used.

Quality and adequacy of topographic control.

All coordinates were collected by handheld GPS.

 

The grid system is the Australian National Grid Zone MGA 51 (GDA 94)

 

The is no specific topographic control as the lake surface can essentially be considered flat.

 

Data spacing and distribution

Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results.

Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied.

Whether sample compositing has been applied.

The lake area contained within the Ballard tenements was calculated by digitising the lake surface and removing the area covered by the islands, the approximate area for the eastern portion of the lake is 359 km2, 205 km2 for the western portion. 181 test pits, 15 auger holes and 2 trenches were excavated over the eastern portion of the lake surface resulting in 1 excavation per 1.8 km2 providing a high density of investigation over this portion of the tenement.

 

However, western portion of the lake has had little to no work completed and is considered to have a low density of investigation suitable for determining an exploration target.

 

Sample compositing not applicable.

Orientation of data in relation to geological structure

Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of possible structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the deposit type.

If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material.

There are no structural or geological controls with respect to sampling the lake bed sediments.  The variation in depth to basement does control the potential depth of future trench systems.

 

Geological influence on the brine is limited to the aquifer parameters of the host rock, namely the hydraulic conductivity, and porosity.

 

Sample security

The measures taken to ensure sample security.

Salt Lake Potash’s field geologists were responsible for bagging and tagging samples prior to shipping to the BV lab in Perth and the Salt Lake Potash offices.  The security measures for the material and type of sampling at hand was appropriate

Audits or reviews

The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data.

Data review included an assessment of the quality of assay data and laboratory tests and verification of sampling and assaying.  No audits of sampling techniques and data have been undertaken.

 

Section 2: Reporting of Exploration Results

Criteria

JORC Code explanation

Commentary

Mineral tenement and land tenure status

Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmental settings.

The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area.

The tenements covering Lake Ballard are all exploration licenses, held solely by Salt Lake Potash, are; E29/912, E29/913, E29/948, E29/958, E29/1011, E29/1021 and E29/1022

 

Exploration done by other parties

Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties.

A large amount of historical exploration work has been undertaken surrounding Lake Ballard focusing on gold, nickel and uranium.  There has been limited exploration on the lake surface with most exploration associated with uranium exploration in the upper 10 m.  Soil sampling was undertaken on the lake, as well as a number of geophysical surveys and shallow drilling activities.  The Company has reviewed multiple publicly available documents to provide an understanding of the geology and hydrogeology in the Lake Ballard paleodrainage.

Geology

Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation.

The deposit is a salt-lake brine deposit.

 

The lake setting is typical of a Western Australian palaeovalley environment. Ancient hydrological systems have incised palaeovalleys into Archaean basement rocks, which were then infilled by Tertiary-aged sediments typically comprising a coarse-grained fluvial basal sand overlaid by palaeovalley clay with some coarser grained interbeds. The clay is overlaid by recent Cainozoic material including lacustrine sediment, calcrete, evaporite and aeolian deposits. 

Drill hole Information

A summary of all information material to the understanding of the exploration results including a tabulation of the following information for all Material drill holes:

o   easting and northing of the drill hole collar

o   elevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevation above sea level in metres) of the drill hole collar

o   dip and azimuth of the hole

o   down hole length and interception depth

o   hole length.

If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that the information is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from the understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly explain why this is the case.

Hollow-stem auger holes were completed along with test pits and trenches were excavated on the lake surface.

 

All test pit and trench details and locations of all data points are presented in the report.

Data aggregation methods

In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques, maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (eg cutting of high grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material and should be stated.

Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high grade results and longer lengths of low grade results, the procedure used for such aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of such aggregations should be shown in detail.

The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values should be clearly stated.

Within the salt-lake extent no low-grade cut-off or high-grade capping has been implemented due to the consistent nature of the brine assay data.

 

Test pit and trench data aggregation comprised calculation of a hydraulic conductivity, transmissivity and drainable porosity for the whole sequence.

 

Relationship between mineralisation widths and intercept lengths

These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of Exploration Results.

If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is known, its nature should be reported.

If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there should be a clear statement to this effect (eg ‘down hole length, true width not known’).

The chemical analysis from each of the test pits and auger holes has shown the that the brine resource is consistent and continuous through the full thickness of the Lake Playa sediments unit. The unit is flat lying all auger holes were excavated into the lake sediments to a depth of 15m or basement, the intersected depth is equivalent to the vertical depth and the thickness of mineralisation.

 

Diagrams

Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of intercepts should be included for any significant discovery being reported These should include, but not be limited to a plan view of drill hole collar locations and appropriate sectional views.

All location maps and sections are contained within the body of the ASX Announcement available at www.saltlakepotash.com.au.

Balanced reporting

Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not practicable, representative reporting of both low and high grades and/or widths should be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of Exploration Results.

All results have been included in the body of the report.

 

Other substantive exploration data

Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be reported including (but not limited to): geological observations; geophysical survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples – size and method of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock characteristics; potential deleterious or contaminating substances.

All material exploration data has been reported.

Further work

The nature and scale of planned further work (eg tests for lateral extensions or depth extensions or large-scale step-out drilling).

Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions, including the main geological interpretations and future drilling areas, provided this information is not commercially sensitive.

·          Further work is planned at the western end of the lake bed in 2019 and a maiden mineral resource estimate will be prepared for Lake Ballard.

 

 

 

This information is provided by RNS, the news service of the London Stock Exchange. RNS is approved by the Financial Conduct Authority to act as a Primary Information Provider in the United Kingdom. Terms and conditions relating to the use and distribution of this information may apply. For further information, please contact rns@lseg.com or visit www.rns.com.

END

Mining exploration entity and oil and gas exploration entity quarterly report

Introduced 01/07/96  Origin Appendix 8  Amended 01/07/97, 01/07/98, 30/09/01, 01/06/10, 17/12/10, 01/05/13, 01/09/16

Name of entity

Salt Lake Potash Limited

ABN

Quarter ended (“current quarter”)

98 117 085 748

31 December 2018

Consolidated statement of cash flows

Current quarter $A’000

Year to date
(6 months)
$A’000

1.

Cash flows from operating activities

1.1

Receipts from customers

1.2

Payments for

(1,664)

(3,298)

(a)   exploration & evaluation

(b)   development

(c)   production

(d)   staff costs

(864)

(1,474)

(e)   administration and corporate costs

(280)

(461)

1.3

Dividends received (see note 3)

1.4

Interest received

19

53

1.5

Interest and other costs of finance paid

1.6

Income taxes paid

1.7

Research and development refunds

1.8

Other (provide details if material)
– Business Development

(302)

(526)

1.9

Net cash from / (used in) operating activities

(3,091)

(5,706)

2.

Cash flows from investing activities

(138)

(260)

2.1

Payments to acquire:

(a)   property, plant and equipment

(b)   tenements (see item 10)

(c)   investments

(d)   other non-current assets

2.2

Proceeds from the disposal of:

(a)   property, plant and equipment

(b)   tenements (see item 10)

(c)   investments

(d)   other non-current assets

2.3

Cash flows from loans to other entities

2.4

Dividends received (see note 3)

2.5

Other (provide details if material)

2.6

Net cash from / (used in) investing activities

(138)

(260)

3.

Cash flows from financing activities

13,000

13,000

3.1

Proceeds from issues of shares

3.2

Proceeds from issue of convertible notes

3.3

Proceeds from exercise of share options

3.4

Transaction costs related to issues of shares, convertible notes or options

(715)

(715)

3.5

Proceeds from borrowings

3.6

Repayment of borrowings

3.7

Transaction costs related to loans and borrowings

3.8

Dividends paid

3.9

Other (provide details if material)

3.10

Net cash from / (used in) financing activities

12,285

12,285

4.

Net increase / (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents for the period

2,972

5,709

4.1

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

4.2

Net cash from / (used in) operating activities (item 1.9 above)

(3,091)

(5,706)

4.3

Net cash from / (used in) investing activities (item 2.6 above)

(138)

(260)

4.4

Net cash from / (used in) financing activities (item 3.10 above)

12,285

12,285

4.5

Effect of movement in exchange rates on cash held

4.6

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

12,028

12,028

5.

Reconciliation of cash and cash equivalents
at the end of the quarter (as shown in the consolidated statement of cash flows) to the related items in the accounts

Current quarter
$A’000

Previous quarter
$A’000

5.1

Bank balances

2,901

1,259

5.2

Call deposits

9,127

1,713

5.3

Bank overdrafts

5.4

Other (provide details)

5.5

Cash and cash equivalents at end of quarter (should equal item 4.6 above)

12,028

2,972

6.

Payments to directors of the entity and their associates

Current quarter
$A’000

6.1

Aggregate amount of payments to these parties included in item 1.2

(175)

6.2

Aggregate amount of cash flow from loans to these parties included in item 2.3

6.3

Include below any explanation necessary to understand the transactions included in items 6.1 and 6.2

Payments include salaries, director and consulting fees, superannuation and provision of corporate, administration services, and a fully serviced office.

7.

Payments to related entities of the entity and their associates

Current quarter
$A’000

7.1

Aggregate amount of payments to these parties included in item 1.2

7.2

Aggregate amount of cash flow from loans to these parties included in item 2.3

7.3

Include below any explanation necessary to understand the transactions included in items 7.1 and 7.2

Not applicable.

8.

Financing facilities available
Add notes as necessary for an understanding of the position

Total facility amount at quarter end
$A’000

Amount drawn at quarter end
$A’000

8.1

Loan facilities

8.2

Credit standby arrangements

8.3

Other (please specify)

8.4

Include below a description of each facility above, including the lender, interest rate and whether it is secured or unsecured. If any additional facilities have been entered into or are proposed to be entered into after quarter end, include details of those facilities as well.

Not applicable

9.

Estimated cash outflows for next quarter

$A’000

9.1

Exploration and evaluation

2,400

9.2

Development

1,500

9.3

Production

9.4

Staff costs

1,100

9.5

Administration and corporate costs

350

9.6

Other (provide details if material)
– Business Development

100

9.7

Total estimated cash outflows

5,450

10.

Changes in tenements
(items 2.1(b) and 2.2(b) above)

Tenement reference and location

Nature of interest

Interest at beginning of quarter

Interest at end of quarter

10.1

Interests in mining tenements and petroleum tenements lapsed, relinquished or reduced

Refer to Appendix 1

10.2

Interests in mining tenements and petroleum tenements acquired or increased

Compliance statement

1        This statement has been prepared in accordance with accounting standards and policies which comply with Listing Rule 19.11A.

2        This statement gives a true and fair view of the matters disclosed.

Sign here:         ……………………………………………………                        Date: 31 January 2019

(Director/Company secretary)

Print name:       Clint McGhie

Notes

1.      The quarterly report provides a basis for informing the market how the entity’s activities have been financed for the past quarter and the effect on its cash position. An entity that wishes to disclose additional information is encouraged to do so, in a note or notes included in or attached to this report.

2.       If this quarterly report has been prepared in accordance with Australian Accounting Standards, the definitions in, and provisions of, AASB 6: Exploration for and Evaluation of Mineral Resources and AASB 107: Statement of Cash Flows apply to this report. If this quarterly report has been prepared in accordance with other accounting standards agreed by ASX pursuant to Listing Rule 19.11A, the corresponding equivalent standards apply to this report.

3.       Dividends received may be classified either as cash flows from operating activities or cash flows from investing activities, depending on the accounting policy of the entity.

This information is provided by RNS, the news service of the London Stock Exchange. RNS is approved by the Financial Conduct Authority to act as a Primary Information Provider in the United Kingdom. Terms and conditions relating to the use and distribution of this information may apply. For further information, please contact rns@lseg.com or visit www.rns.com.

END

Salt Lake Potash #SO4 – Scoping Study For Low Capex, High Margin Demonstration Plant At Lake Way

Salt Lake Potash Limited (SO4) is pleased to announce that a Scoping Study on development of a 50,000tpa sulphate of potash (SOP) Demonstration Plant at Lake Way supports a low capex, highly profitable, staged development model, with total capital costs of approximately A$49m and average cash operating costs (FOB) of approximately A$387/t.

Cautionary Statement

The Scoping Study referred to in this announcement has been undertaken to determine the potential viability of a Demonstration Plant constructed at the Lake Way Project (Project) and to reach a decision to provide a basis for proceeding with more definitive studies. The Scoping Study has been prepared to an accuracy level of ±30%. The results should not be considered a profit forecast or production forecast.

The Scoping Study is a preliminary technical and economic study of the potential viability of the Lake Way Project. In accordance with the ASX Listing Rules, the Company advises it is based on low-level technical and economic assessments that are not sufficient to support the estimation of ore reserves. Further evaluation work including infill drilling and appropriate studies are required before Salt Lake Potash will be able to estimate any ore reserves or to provide any assurance of an economic development case.

100% of the total production target is in the Indicated and Measured resource category.

The Scoping Study is based on the material assumptions outlined elsewhere in this announcement. These include assumptions about the availability of funding. While Salt Lake Potash considers all the material assumptions to be based on reasonable grounds, there is no certainty that they will prove to be correct or that the range of outcomes indicated by the Scoping Study will be achieved.

To achieve the range outcomes indicated in the Scoping Study, additional funding will likely be required. Investors should note that there is no certainty that Salt Lake Potash will be able to raise funding when needed. It is also possible that such funding may only be available on terms that dilute or otherwise affect the value of the Salt Lake Potash’s existing shares. It is also possible that Salt Lake Potash could pursue other ‘value realisation’ strategies such as sale, partial sale, or joint venture of the Project. If it does, this could materially reduce Salt Lake Potash’s proportionate ownership of the Project.

The Company has concluded it has a reasonable basis for providing the forward looking statements included in this announcement and believes that it has a reasonable basis to expect it will be able to fund the development of the Project. Given the uncertainties involved, investors should not make any investment decisions based solely on the results of the Scoping Study.

SCOPING STUDY OUTCOMES

Capital Costs (-10% & +30%)

Total Capital Costs

Including:

–  Temporary facilities

–  EPCM
–  Growth allowance (contingency)

A$49m

 

A$0.4m
A$4.8m
A$6.3m

Average Total Cash Cost (FOB) (+/- 30%)

Average Total Cash Cost (FOB)

Comprising:

–  Mine Gate Opex

–  Transport and handling

–  Royalties

A$387/t

A$251/t
A$96/t
A$40/t

Forecast SOP Price:

A$667/t (US$500/t)

Study Manager:

Wood (formerly Amec Foster Wheeler)

Average Annual Production:

50,000 tonnes of SOP

Product Specifications:

Industry Standard Sulphate of Potash (K2SO4):

K2O: min. 52%

SO4: min.54%

Cl: <1%

Mineral Resource:

The Demonstration Plant is 100% supported by an Indicated and Measured Mineral Resource (drainable) within the Blackham mining lease area totalling 0.5Mt (Stored Resource – 2Mt), a multiple of the resource required to support a 50,000tpa Demonstration Plant for 2-3 years.

Evaporation Pond Construction:

On-lake, unlined halite ponds

On-lake, partially (wall) lined harvest ponds

Transport Route (export):

Quad road train haulage to Geraldton

Tenure:

The Demonstration Plant will initially be based on Mining Leases owned by Blackham Resources Limited, under the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) described in the ASX Announcement dated 12 March 2018.

Longer term and larger volume production will be based on SLP’s Lake Way exploration permits.

Timeline:

The Company’s objective is to produce initial harvest salts in mid-late 2019 for initial SOP production in early 2020, subject to permitting, weather and other parameters. 

There are potentially considerable time savings from utilising the super-saturated brines in the Williamson Pit at Lake Way and testwork continues to define these parameters.

DEVELOPMENT PROCESS

The Demonstration Plant is intended to validate the technical and commercial viability of brine SOP production from the Company’s Goldfields Salt Lakes Project (GSLP), providing the basis to build a world class, low cost, long life SOP operation across the 9 lakes in the GSLP.

The Company has previously established that larger production volumes (400,000tpa) can result in operating costs in the lowest cost quartile for SOP production globally*. This is principally a result of the economies of scale inherent in the GSLP’s advantageous location in the Northern Goldfields mining district, mostly in the main cost centres of transport, labour and power.

The Company will pursue a fast track, staged approach to the development of a Demonstration Plant at Lake Way, taking advantage of the unique circumstances of the Williamson Pit to accelerate the development timeline, while also de-risking the project at each stage.

Pursuant to the MOU with Blackham Resources Ltd (Blackham), the Company will construct an initial pond system to dewater the Williamson Pit, which contains approximately 1.2GL of super-saturated brine, with a very high average SOP content of 25kg/m3. These Williamson Ponds will comprise approximately 1/3 of the total Demonstration Plant pond area, and early dewatering of the Williamson Pit offers a much shorter development time due to its very high grade and saturation.

SLP plans to construct the Williamson Ponds by the end of 2018, in parallel with completing a Feasibility Study for the Demonstration Plant, followed by initial kainite salt harvesting in mid-late 2019.

After the Feasibility Study, the Company anticipates completing the balance of the on-lake infrastructure – evaporation ponds and trenches – while the fabrication of the process plant is completed offsite. Stockpiled kainite harvest salt will be used for commissioning when the plant is installed, also on existing Mining Leases, with the Company planning for initial SOP production in early 2020, subject to weather, permitting and other factors.

LONGER TERM OUTLOOK

The excellent economic parameters support the development of a Demonstration Plant on the Blackham Mining Leases at Lake Way, which would likely be followed by expanded production onto SLP’s current Exploration Permits, covering most of the Lake and including the paleochannel identified by previous exploration.

Expansion of production beyond the Demonstration Plant would capture substantial economies of scale inherent in bulk transport, reduced royalties and spreading the fixed cost base, amongst other things.

The Company has previously estimated Exploration Targets for the whole of Lake Way ranging from 28-54Mt of SOP (stored) and 3-19Mt (drainable), indicating potential for the Lake to support a much larger SOP operation. [The potential quantity and grade of this Exploration Target is conceptual in nature. There has been insufficient exploration to estimate a Mineral Resource and it is uncertain if further exploration will result in the estimation of a Mineral Resource].

Following demonstration of the viability of SOP production in the GSLP the Company plans to expand production to the other lakes, which have broadly similar salt production potential and transport solutions in some cases superior to Lake Way. The company is investigating integrated production scenarios across a number of lakes, ranging from centralised processing of intermediate concentrates to centralised stockpiling, transport staging, packaging and logistics.

As production volumes increase, particularly to the lakes south of Lake Way, the optimal transport solution is likely to be based on bulk rail haulage from Leonora or Malcolm sidings, through Kalgoorlie to port. Transport and handling is the largest cost centre for SOP production, and there is substantial potential to capture economies of scale from this logistics solution.

The Company has been in discussion with a range of parties about potential financing structures for a Demonstration Plant on the GSLP, including debt, equity, off-take, royalty and joint venture structures. The Company is well funded to continue Feasibility Study work while these discussions continue.

The Company is in the process of drafting a formal agreement with Blackham, in accordance with the MOU. Both parties currently anticipate dewatering of the Williamson Pit in late 2018/early 2019.

CEO Matt Syme said “This Scoping Study confirms our expectations that a Demonstration Plant at Lake Way is the ideal model for starting development of the broader SOP project across our extensive salt lake portfolio. The advantages inherent in our location and the cost benefits associated with low cost trench extraction and on-lake ponds are apparent, and these advantages will increase significantly with scale. The low capex, excellent operating margins and ability to de-risk the Project through staged development also give us the opportunity to optimise the numerous financing alternatives before us.  We are excited to be at the leading edge of a whole new industry in Australia and we are looking forward to developing the most sustainable and rewarding fertiliser project in the world.”

BACKGROUND

SLP is the owner of the Goldfields Salt Lakes Project (GSLP), which comprises nine large salt lakes in the Northern Goldfields Region of Western Australia.

The GSLP has a number of important, favourable characteristics:

Ø  Very large paleochannel hosted brine aquifers, with chemistry amenable to evaporation of salts for SOP production, extractable from both low-cost trenches and deeper bores;

Ø  Over 3,300km2 of playa surface, with in-situ clays suitable for low cost on-lake pond construction;

Ø  The total “stored” Exploration Target for the GSLP is 290Mt – 458Mt of contained Sulphate of Potash (SOP) with an average SOP grade of 4.4 – 7.1kg/m3 (including Lake Wells’ Mineral Resource of 80-85Mt). On a “drainable” basis the total Exploration Target ranges from 26Mt – 153Mt of SOP. [The potential quantity and grade of this Exploration Target is conceptual in nature. There has been insufficient exploration to estimate a Mineral Resource and it is uncertain if further exploration will result in the estimation of a Mineral Resource].

Ø  Excellent evaporation conditions;

Ø  Excellent access to transport, energy and other infrastructure in the Goldfields mining district;

Ø  Lowest quartile capex and opex potential based on the Lake Wells Scoping Study;

Ø  Clear opportunity to reduce transport costs by developing lakes closer to infrastructure and by capturing economies of scale;

Ø  Multi-lake production offers operational flexibility, cost advantages and risk mitigation from localised weather events;

Ø  The very high level of technical validation already undertaken at Lake Wells substantially applies to the other lakes in the GSLP; and

Ø  Potential co-product revenues, particularly where transport costs are lowest.

The Company’s long term plan is to develop an integrated SOP operation of global scale producing high quality organic SOP from a number (or all) of the lakes within the GSLP, after confirming the technical and commercial elements of the Project through construction and operation of a Demonstration Plant producing up to 50,000tpa of SOP.

DEMONSTRATION PLANT

The Company believes the advantages of the Demonstration Plant approach are:

·     While substantial salt-lake brine production of SOP is undertaken in China, Chile and the USA, it is new in Australia and overseas production models need to be tested and adapted for Australian conditions.

·     Proof of concept for SOP production from salt-lake brines in Australia will substantially de-risk the full-scale project, with commensurate improvement in financing costs and alternatives. While the Demonstration Plant does not benefit from economies of scale, it will provide financiers and partners a very reliable cost basis for larger scale, longer term operations, while still being low capex and high margin in its own right.

·     Refinement of design and costing of engineering elements at Demonstration Plant scale should result in considerable time and cost savings at larger scale.

·     Market acceptance of a new product in conservative agricultural markets is best achieved progressively and in conjunction with existing, established partner(s). It is important to establish SLP’s product(s) as premium, sustainable nutrients in the key long-term markets, and staged production increments are the best way to achieve this objective.

·     A Demonstration Plant offers an accelerated pathway to initial production, with limited infrastructure requirements and a faster, simpler approval process. The Demonstration Plant is intended to operate for 12-24 months to establish parameters for larger scale production, and then be integrated into a larger operation. The Company’s objective is to commence construction in 2018, harvesting first salts in 2019, and producing first SOP in early 2020.

LAKE WAY

The Company’s recent Memorandum of Understanding with Blackham Resources Limited (see ASX Announcement dated 12 March 2018) offers the potential for an expedited path to development at Lake Way, possibly the best site for a 50,000tpa Demonstration Plant in Australia.

Lake Way is located less than 15km south of Wiluna. The Wiluna region is an historic mining precinct dating back to the late 19th century. It has been a prolific nickel and gold mining region with well developed, high quality infrastructure in place.

The Goldfields Highway is a high quality sealed road permitted to carry quad road trains and passes 2km from the Lake. The Goldfields Gas Pipeline is adjacent to SLP’s tenements, running past the eastern side of the Lake.

Lake Way has some compelling advantages which make it potentially an ideal site for an SOP operation, including:

·        Substantial capital and operating savings potential from sharing overheads and infrastructure with the Wiluna Gold Mine. This includes the accommodation camp, flights, power, maintenance, infrastructure and other costs.

·        The site has an excellent freight solution, located 2km from the Goldfields Highway, which is permitted for heavy haulage 4 trailer road trains to the railhead at Leonora or by road to Geraldton. It is also adjacent to the Goldfields Gas Pipeline.

·        A Demonstration Plant would likely be built on Blackham’s existing Mining Licences.

·        SLP would dewater the Williamson Pit, prior to Blackham mining, planned for early-mid 2019. The pit contains an estimated 1.2GL of brine at the exceptional grade of 25kg/m3 of SOP. This brine is potentially the ideal starter feed for evaporation ponds, having already evaporated from the normal Lake Way brine grade, which averages around 14kg/m3.

·        The high grade brines at Lake Way will result in lower capital and operating costs due to lower extraction and evaporation requirements.

·        Historical exploration and initial sampling indicate the presence of clays in the upper levels of the lake which should be amenable to low cost, on-lake evaporation pond construction.

PROJECT OVERVIEW

The Demonstration Plant will produce up to 50,000tpa of high quality, standard SOP from hypersaline brine extracted from Lake Way via a system of shallow trenches.

The extracted brine will be transported to a series of solar evaporation ponds built on the Lake where selective evapo-concentration will precipitate potassium double salts in the final evaporation stage. These potassium-rich salts will be mechanically harvested and processed into SOP in a separation and crystallisation plant. The final product will then be transported for sale to the domestic and international markets.

The Company has previously tested and verified at Lake Wells all the major technical foundations for production of SOP from salt lake brine under actual site conditions and across all seasons. These technical achievements are broadly applicable across all the lakes in the GSLP and form part of the inputs into the Scoping Study.

The Study has established the indicative costs of the Demonstration Plant to +/- 30% accuracy for Operating Costs and -10%/+30% for Capital Expenditure.

MAJOR STUDY PARAMETERS

Table 1:  Key Assumptions and Inputs 

Maximum Study Accuracy Variation

+/- 30%

Annual Production (steady state)

50,000tpa

Proportion of Production Target – Measured & Indicated

100%

Mineral Resource (Blackham Mining Leases)

SOP Stored Resource (Indicated)

2Mt

SOP Drainable Resource (Indicated)

490,000t

Williamson Pit (Measured)

32,000t

Mining Method (Extraction)

Trenches – Average 5m deep

30km

Brine Delivery

595m3/h

Brine Chemistry (SOP Lake Brine only)

15kg/m3

Evaporation Ponds

Area

389ha

Halite Ponds (unlined)

308ha

Harvest Ponds (partially lined)

81ha

Recovery of Potassium from feed brine

63%

Recovery of Sulphate from feed brine

21%

Plant

Operating time (h/a)

7,950

Total Staffing

20

Operating Costs  (±30%)

Minegate

A$251/t

Transport and Handling

A$96/t

Royalties 1

A$40/t

Total Cash Costs (FOB)

A$387/t

Capital Costs (-10%/+30%)

Direct

A$37.3m

Indirect

A$5.2m

Growth Allowance

A$6.3m

Total Capital

A$48.9m

1    Royalties (State Government 2.5% and Other 4.5%)

* Operating costs do not include deprecation or sustaining capital. The Demonstration Plant is intended to operate for 2-3 years to validate the production model, and a successful Demonstration Plant will naturally then be intregrated into a larger production operation.

STUDY CONSULTANTS

The Scoping Study was managed by Wood (formerly Amec Foster Wheeler). Wood is a recognised leader in potash mining and processing with capabilities extending to detailed engineering, procurement and construction management. Wood also managed the Company’s Scoping Study for Lake Wells released in August 2016.

In addition to Wood, the Company engaged international brine-processing experts Carlos Perucca Processing Consulting Ltd (CPPC) and AD Infinitum Ltd (AD Infinitum) and their principals Mr Perucca and Mr Bravo, who are highly regarded experts in the potash industry. Mr Bravo previously worked as Process Manager Engineer at SQM, the third largest salt lake SOP producer globally. He specialises in the front end of brine processing from feed brine through to the crystallisation of harvest salts. Mr Perucca has over 25 years of experience in mineral process engineering and provided high-level expertise with respect to plant operations for the processing of harvest salts through to final SOP product. AD Infinitum and CPPC were responsible for the brine evaporation and salt processing components in the Scoping Study.

The Company engaged Bis Consulting (Bis) to provide an independent transport study on the logistics options for SOP from Lake Way. Bis is a leading provider of resources logistics in Australia, offering bulk logistics and materials handling.

Independent expert potash market forecasts and assessments were provided by CRU International Limited and Fertiliser Sales Development Ltd.

Area

Responsibility

Study Manager

Wood

Resource Estimation

Groundwater Science

Hydrogeology

SLP

Brine Extraction

SLP

Brine Evaporation

Ad-Infinitum/Knight Piésold

Geotechnical

Knight Piésold

Process Plant

–      Design basis/criteria

CPPC/SLP

–      Process plant design

Wood

Plant Infrastructure

Wood

Area Infrastructure

Wood/SLP

Product Transport and Logistics

Bis Consulting

Environmental and Heritage

Pendragon

Capex Estimate Compilation

Wood

Opex Estimate Compilation (mine-gate)

Wood

Economic Analysis

Wood

Recommendations

Wood/SLP

CAPITAL EXPENDITURE

The initial capital cost to develop from the Demonstration Plant has been estimated at A$43 million (before growth allowance). Capital expenditure was estimated at an accuracy of -10% to +30%.

Area

$Am

Brine Extraction

1.6

Evaporation

7.8

Process Plant

20.3

Plant Infrastructure

3.0

Area Infrastructure

0.1

Regional Infrastructure

2.6

Miscellaneous

1.9

Total Direct

37.3

Temporary Facilities

0.4

EPCM

4.8

Total Indirect

5.2

Total Bare

42.5

Growth Allowance

6.3

Total Initial Capital

48.9

* Errors due to rounding

The benefits of Lake Way’s location are evident in the low area and regional infrastructure costs. The availability of a wide flat playa area amenable in-situ clays offers the opportunity to construct low capex evaporation ponds on the Lake.

OPERATING COSTS

The operating cost estimates are based on an accuracy of ±30%.

Area

Cost per tonne ($A)

Labour

 $    57

Power

 $    24

Maintenance

 $    22

Reagents

 $    14

Consumables

 $    81

Miscellaneous

 $    32

General and Administration

 $    21

Total (Operating Costs per tonne) Mine Gate

 $  251

Transportation

 $    96

Total (Operating Costs per tonne)

 $  347

Royalties (2.5% State Government and 4.5% Others)

$    40

Total Operating Cost per tonne

$  387

* Errors due to rounding

PROJECT GEOLOGY AND RESOURCE

Geological Setting

The investigation area is in the Northern Goldfields Province on the Archaean Yilgarn Craton. The province is characterised by granite-greenstone rocks that exhibit a prominent northwest tectonic trend and low to medium-grade metamorphism. The Archaean rocks are intruded by east-west dolerite dykes of Proterozoic age, and in the eastern area there are small, flat-lying outliers of Proterozoic and Permian sedimentary rocks. The basement rocks are generally poorly exposed owing to low relief, extensive superficial cover, and widespread deep weathering. 

A key feature of the Goldfields is the presence of paleochannel aquifers.  Palaeochannels are former deep river valleys that eroded into the bedrock within the broad palaeodrainages the sedimentary sequence in the northern goldfields is approximately 130m thick comprising basal Eocene sand overlain by plastic clay, which is in turn concealed by the lakebed sediments and surface alluvial cover.

The stratigraphy of the lake and paleochannel system is described below

Lake Bed Sediments

The hydrogeology of Lake Way is that of a terminal groundwater sink. The large area of the playa and the shallow water table observed at all sites beneath the playa will facilitate evaporative loss. The brine potash resource extends the full depth of the lakebed sediments, with higher permeability noted at the weathered bedrock contact.

The Lake bed sediments are dominated by red-brown lacustrine clays. Logging and observation of the stratigraphy from the test pits indicated that multiple paleosurfaces are evident within the lake sediments, with characteristics very similar to the current lacustrine and fringing environments. 

Moving east from the lake edge the sedimentary sequence consists of clean, evaporitic sands, beneath the surface sands there is evidence of vegetated type paleosurfaces. These surfaces are characterised by thin beds of dark brown to black (organic enriched) evaporitic sands overlying lacustrine clays with abundant remnant root channels. 

Beneath these the sandy silty clays are firm to hard and notably competent.

The lakebed sediments in the vicinity of the Williamson pit are approximately 3 – 4m thick, they were initially dewatered prior to mining and have remained dry since. Test pits excavated within the dewatered zone had a water level 2.5mbgl after 24 hours.

Paleochannel Sediments

The paleochannel sediments are overlain by the brine rich Lacustrine sequence. The paleochannel sediments are dominated by dense grey and redbrown clays. These clays have a low permeability and are not considered a principal source of brine. At the base of the clays there is a high permeability basal sand aquifer. 

Paleochannel Basal Sand Aquifer

Drilling conducted by AGC Woodward Clyde (1992)1 on behalf of WMC Ltd in the early 1990’s located a Tertiary paleochannel beneath the eastern margins of the lakebed outside Blackham’s Mining Leases, the basal sands within the paleochannel were observed to be 20 – 40m thick. The hydrochemistry of the paleochannel water is high in Potassium, Magnesium sulphate and therefore represents a prospective exploration target and future source of brine, it is not included within the current resource estimate.

1Woodward Clyde, 1992, Mt Keith Project Process Water Supply Study, Lake Way Area, Prepared for WMC Engineering Services Ltd.

Basement

The shallowness of sediments, particular to the west of the WIllaimson pit and the island, means that the weathered basement is at excavatable depths. Further to the east the lakebed sequence thickens to depth approaching 15 – 20m. Basement geology is complex with mafic, felsic and metasedimentary rocks existing in multiple, thin, NNW-SSE trending lineations along with an abundance of (often, recently activated) faults. Brine flows from basement contacts is highly variable but, in places, can be very rapid. 

Williamson Pit

There is a significant brine resource within the Williamson Pit. The top of the brine sits approximately 30m below ground level (bgl). There is only minor evidence of inflow from above the standing brine level from either the bedrock or the lakebed sediments. 

The annual sequence of seepage and rainfall followed by evaporation has, over the past 10 years since the pits closure, concentrated the salts to the point where they are almost twice the concentration than the brine contained within the lakebed sediments.

MINERAL RESOURCE

The Lake Way Mineral Resource (Blackham tenements only) was estimated by Groundwater Science Pty Ltd, an independent hydrogeological consultant with substantial salt lake brine expertise.

The Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE) underpinning the production target, classified as Indicated and Measured, was prepared by a Competent Person and is reported in accordance with the JORC Code (2012 Edition) in this announcement. 

Total Mineral Resource Estimate

(Blackham tenements only)  

Sediment Hosted Brine – Indicated (94%)

Playa Area

Lakebed Sediment Volume

Brine Concentration

Mineral Tonnage Calculated from Total Porosity

Mineral Tonnage Calculated from Drainable Porosity

K

Mg

SO4

Total Porosity

Brine Volume

SOP Tonnage

Drainable Porosity

Brine Volume

SOP Tonnage

(km2)

(Mm3)

(kg/m3)

(kg/m3)

(Kg/m3)

(Mm3)

(kt)

(Mm3)

(kt)

55.4

290

6.9

7.6

28.3

0.43

125

1,900

0.11

31.9

490

 

Williamson Pit Brine – Measured (6%)

Brine Volume (Mm3)

Potassium Conc.   (kg/m3)

Magnesium Conc.   (kg/m3)

Sulphate Conc.  

(kg/m3)

SOP Tonnage (kt)

1.26

11.4

14.47

48

32

Table 3: Lake Way Project – Mineral Resource Estimate (JORC 2012)

Hydrology Summary 

The Lake Way catchment as defined using Geoscience Australia’s 1 second DEM and MapInfo Discover Hydrology Package, the catchment area is 3,767 km2.

A runoff model was developed for the Lake Way Catchment using the WaterCress software package. The model was constructed and calibrated to the adjacent and analogous Gascoyne River catchment, and then run using the catchment area defined for Lake Way and rainfall data from the Wiluna BOM station. Average calculated annual run-off is 3.9% of annual rainfall but is highly variable.

The morphology of the playa shape and surface is consistent with the classification system described by Bowler, (1986). The Northern part of the Playa exhibits morphology typical of significant surface water influence and periodic inundation (smooth playa edges, one island). The southern part of the playa exhibits morphology consistent with a groundwater dominated playa with rare inundation (irregular shoreline, numerous islands).

Exploration History

Significant historical exploration work has been completed in the Lake Way area focusing on nickel, gold and uranium. The Company has reviewed multiple publicly available documents including relevant information on the Lake Way’s hydrogeology and geology.  

A review of the Department of Mines and Petroleum’s WAMEX database was undertaken. The database contains more than 6,200 mineral exploration drill holes across the Lake Way region, with about 1,000 drill holes within the Blackham Mining Lease area above.

Recent Exploration Activities

A comprehensive surface aquifer exploration program was completed on the Blackham Mining Leases, comprising a total of 36 shallow test pits and 2 test trenches. This work provides preliminary data for the geological and hydrological models of the surface aquifer of the Lake and was used in the establishment of the Mineral Resource for Lake Way’s surface aquifer.

Estimation and Modelling Techniques

Area

The lateral extent of the indicated resource is defined by the tenement boundary and the Playa edge.  Within the tenement area there are two significant features that reduce the total area, namely the island in the central north of the tenement (3.2km2) and the Williamson pit and associated dewatered zone (4km2).  The total area of the resource is 55.4 km2. The resource is open to the east and south of the Blackham Resources tenements.

Thickness

The top of the indicated resource is defined by the water table. The average water table depth beneath the playa surface noted in the piezometers and test pits ranged 0.3 to 0.5m averaging 0.4m.

The base of the indicated resource is defined by the depth to the base of the lakebed sediments within the Blackham Mining Leases as determined from the test pits, piezometers, air core drilling and previous work. Test pits to the west terminated in weathered basement at around 3mbgl whilst some air core holes to the east didn’t encounter base of the lakebed sediments until 9mbgl. All air core holes and test pits terminated in saturated material. 

The base of the lakebed sediments was interpolated from recent and historic drill hole information and the recent data using the Leapfrog software. The interpolation provided an average thickness of 5.3m.

Porosity

Total porosity (Pt) relates to the volume of brine filled pores contained within a unit volume of aquifer material. A fraction of this pore volume can by drained under gravity, this is described as the drainable porosity (or specific yield).  The remaining fraction of the brine, which is held by surface tension and cannot be drained under gravity, is described as the un-drainable porosity (or specific retention). The resource estimate is reported for both total porosity and drainable porosity to assess the Lake Way resource.

Twenty four (24) samples were selected from push tube locations next to test pit locations and from test pit excavations and LYTR01 (Trench 1) across the playa. The push tube samples were analysed by E-Precision Laboratories in Perth and the remaining samples by Core Laboratories in Perth. Samples were selected on the basis of spatial variability across the playa and being representative of the lakebed stratigraphy. Eighteen (18) of the samples were also tested for drainable porosity (Specific Yield). The samples selected, and the results are shown in Table.

The results show a broad concentration into two layers with the upper layer 0 – 1.5m having a porosity in the region of 50% and the lower layer having a porosity of around 40%.  Drainable porosity is generally lower towards the base of the lakebed sediments. This differentiation is consistent with the geology, the upper layer being more friable and sandy and the lower layers being more dense clay.

Test pit or Trench name

Depth

Total Porosity (%)

Drainable porosity
(%)

Comments

LYTT024

0.45 – 0.9

50

n/a

LYTT021

0.6 – 1.1

50

n/a

LYTT020

0.5 – 1.0

54

n/a

LYTT017

0.6 – 1.1

50

n/a

LYTT019

0.6 – 1.1

48

n/a

LYTT014

0.3 – 0.8

52

n/a

LYTT026

0.3 – 0.6

39

10

LYTT019

0.3 – 0.6

26

16

LYTT019

1.5 – 2.0

47

13

LYTT019

3.0 – 4.0

35

8

LYTT014

0.3 – 0.6

46

11

LYTT015

1.5 – 2.0

41

5

LYTT026

3.0 – 4.0

47

24

Outlier

LYTT035

3.0 – 3.5

43

5

LYTT035

0 – 0.5

39

12

LYTT032

0 – 0.5

38

13.8

LYTT029

4.0 – 5.0

38

5.2

Northernmost zone, stiff compact clay content

LYTT029

1.0 – 4.0

47

3

Northernmost zone, clay dominant throughout

LYTT010

0.5 – 4.0

38

3

Potentially dewatered sediment

LYTT020

3.0 – 4.0

50

6

Low Sy value compared to total porosity

LYTR01

0.5 – 1.5

48

14.2

LYTR01

1 – 1.2

37

26

Clean Sand

LYTR01

1.5 – 3

48

1.5

Outlier

LYTR01

3 – 4

36

5

Table 4: Laboratory Derived Parameters – Total Porosity and Drainable Porosity

Long Term Test Pumping

Sustained pump tests on two test trenches provided reliable data for the preparation of a surface aquifer hydrogeological model for Lake Way.

The testing was conducted as a “constant head test” whereby flow rate was adjusted to maintain a constant trench water level. Drawdown was observed at nearby observation bores placed at distances of 10m, 20m and 50m from the trench.

Trench dimensions and pumping test results are presented in Table 5.

Average flow rates over the duration of testing ranged from 94 to 110m3/day. Higher flow rates are associated with evaporite deposits in the Playa Sediments.

These results are encouraging and continue to support the design of the SOP operation at Lake Way. 

Hole Id

Depth

Trench Length

Test Duration

Total Volume Pumped

Average Pumping Rate

(m)

(m)

(days)

(m3)

(m3/day)

Trench 1

4.0

112

9.8

1,074

110

Trench 2

4.0

100

9.0

858

94

Table 5: Summary of Trench Test Pumping

Brine chemistry was consistent throughout the duration of the test.

Analysis of the data from trench pumping trials at test trenches LYTR01 and LYTR02 yields estimates of drainable porosity of 13% and 15% respectively. These values are consistent with literature values for clastic sediment and are consistent with estimates of playa sediment drainable porosity reported by other Salt Lake Brine evaluation studies.

Williamson Pit

The Measured Resource is calculated as the tonnage of minerals dissolved in the liquid brine contained within the Williamson Pit shell.

The potassium tonnage of the resource is then calculated as: Brine volume times average concentration = tonnage

The Williamson pit was mined during 2005 and 2006. At the end of mining a detailed survey was undertaken (2006) prior to the open cut operation being allowed to fill with water.

This data represents the most recent information available on the pit shell.

A drone survey of the pit in 2016 established that the water level was at RL1462 (Referenced to Blackham mine grid). Using this RL and the pit shell the volume was calculated in Surpac to be 1,150,495m3.

Brine Chemistry

Lake Way

All brine samples are considered to be composite samples representing the whole excavated or drilled depth at each location. Given that the proposed abstraction techniques will involve trenches excavated to at least 4m across a large portion of the playa the use of composite samples is representative of the resource that will be extracted.

Potassium

K

(kg/m3)

Chloride

Cl

(kg/m3)

Sodium

Na

(kg/m3)

Calcium

Ca

(kg/m3)

Magnesium

Mg

(kg/m3)

Sulphate

SO4
(kg/m3)

Average

6.8

125

76

0.518

7.7

28

Table 6:  Lake Way Average Brine Chemistry

The spatial distribution of Potassium Concentration is quite consistent ranging from 5,910 to 8,760mg/L averaging 6,769mg/L.

Williamson Pit

A total of 9 brine samples were taken at different water levels in three locations in the Pit. Brine concentration was consistent laterally and vertically within the Pit and average of the nine (9) samples in estimating the Measured Resource is:

Potassium

K

(kg/m3)

Chloride

Cl

(kg/m3)

Sodium

Na

(kg/m3)

Calcium

Ca

(kg/m3)

Magnesium

Mg

(kg/m3)

Sulphate

SO4
(kg/m3)

Average

11.4

180

107

0.176

14.5

48

Table 7:  Williamson Pit Average Brine Chemistry

Mining Factors or Assumptions

The measured resource will be pumped directly from the pit into a holding pond for processing.  Mining of the indicated resource will be undertaken by gravity drainage of the brine by pumping from trenches. 

Metallurgical Factors or Assumptions

No metallurgical factors or assumptions have been applied.

The brine is characterised by elevated concentration of potassium, magnesium and sulphate elements and distinctly low in calcium ion. Such a chemical makeup is considered highly favourable for efficient recovery of potassium double salts from the playa brines (the main feedstock for SOP fertiliser production), using conventional evaporation methods.

Environmental Factors or Assumptions

Environmental impacts are expected to be; localized reduction in saline groundwater level, surface disturbance associated with trench and pond construction and accumulation of salt tails. The project is in a remote area and these impacts are not expected to prevent project development.

The project is located with the Goldfields Groundwater Proclamation Area. A license to take groundwater will be required under the Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914. This act is administered by the Government of Western Australia, Department of Water and Environmental Regulation.

MINING AND SCHEDULING

Brine Extraction

Brine will be extracted from the Lake using a network of surface trenches. A trenching system comprising of 30 km of trenches up to 5m deep will be installed.

The trench system will feed the evaporation ponds at an average annual demand of 163 L/s. The trenches will be excavated at a nominal gradient, with a single transfer point into the halite pond system.

Brine Evaporation

The extracted brine is concentrated in a series of solar ponds to induce the sequential precipitation of salts and eventually producing potassium double salts in the harvest ponds. Evaporation modelling, pond sizing and design was completed by international experts, Ad Infinitum and CPPC.

Evaporation Ponds

The operational area of the evaporation ponds required for the final 50,000 t/a SOP production rate is 350ha.

A comprehensive geotechnical investigation by the Company and Knight Piesold confirmed the availability of in-situ clays ideal for on-lake evaporation pond construction.

On-lake harvest ponds have considerable environmental and commercial advantages, as any seepage from the ponds simply return to the brine pool in the Lake.

The Demonstration Plant Scoping Study considers low cost, un-lined ponds for the evaporation and crystallisation of halite (NaCl) and small quantities of other rejected salts such as gypsum (Ca.SO4.2H2O).

The kainite and carnallite harvest ponds will be partially lined, with a HDPE liner around the inside walls (berms). Knight Piésold’s modelling confirm that the high clay content and low soil permeability of the Lake Way playa sediments mean seepage of unlined evaporation ponds is very low.

Ongoing testwork will determine whether the harvest ponds can also be constructed without partial lining as indicated by preliminary modelling, which would result in further capital savings.

The pond systems will produce, on average 326Kt per annum of harvest salts, with an average Potassium (K) content of 8.76%. The Company has developed a high level of understanding of salt harvest parameters through computer simulations, laboratory evaporation trials and SLP’s unique experience in operating evaporation trials in the field at Lake Wells. The combination of this experience has been used to build and refine the mass balance model for the Demonstration Plant.

The harvest salts will be drained, windrowed and harvested using conventional equipment, a cost-effective and reliable harvesting method in Australia. 

PROCESSING PLANT

Salts harvested form the evaporation ponds are then treated in a processing plant to first purify and then convert these salts into SOP, while minimising deportment of sodium chloride (the principal contaminant) to the product.

Key design parameters for the process plant are presented in Table 8, below.

Operating Time

Brine extraction; evaporation ponds and harvesting

8,200 h/a

Process plant

7,950 h/a

Feed Brine Composition

Potassium content

6.8 g/L

Sulphate content

26 g/L

Pond feed brine flow rate (for 50,000t/a case)

595m3/h @ 8,760 h/a

Overall potassium recovery

63%

Overall sulphate recovery

21%

Table 8: Process Plant Parameters

Overall potassium recoveries are lower in the Demonstration Plant as potassium reporting to the carnallite ponds is not processed at this scale. Carnallite salt will be stockpiled for Stage II processing.

The scale of the process plant is designed around the largest scale of standard road transportable modules that can be constructed off-site and transported to site, minimising site based construction costs. The majority of the process plant components are readily available, off the shelf items. There are several long lead-time items, such as the atmospheric draft tube baffle crystalliser, which will be sourced from international specialist vendors.

The Scoping Study anticipates production of 50,000tpa of high quality, organic standard SOP with the following specifications:

Potassium (K2O)

Min. 52%

Sulphate (SO4)

Min. 54%

Chloride (Cl)

< 1%

SLP’s research indicates that, once in production, organic certification for the product should be obtainable if desired.

Discussions with partners and end users around the optimal product preparation for the Demonstration Plant are ongoing, including the possibility of agglomerated or and compacted of a granular products.

WATER AND POWER

A raw water requirement of around 45m3/h is estimated, of which 7m3/h is treated in a reverse osmosis unit for potable and boiler feed water. A number of potential sources have been identified, as a consequence of the long exploration and mining history in the area, including from existing mining voids and known subterranean aquifers.

The operating power requirement for the plant is 0.8MW. There is substantial surplus capacity available from the Wiluna Gold Mine power station. The Company is also investigating stand-alone renewable energy alternatives.

TRANSPORT

The lakes of the GSLP are located close to the major regional transport and energy infrastructure corridors. Transport from site to port is the single largest cost for (export oriented) Australian salt lake SOP projects and the GSLP has a considerable advantage in this regard, with excellent proximity to the Kalgoorlie-Leonora rail line and the Goldfields Highway. The Company has made substantial progress in understanding and optimising its transport proposition, with major economies of scale to be achieved as the production volume increases.

The Lake Way development has been fast-tracked due to its significant infrastructure and transport advantages.

The Company engaged Bis Consulting to undertake a transport study for production from the Demonstration Plant. Bis is a leading provider of resources logistics in Australia, offering bulk logistics and materials handling processes.

Transport cost estimates were undertaken by Bis based on market data, industry databases, industry contacts and Bis’ existing knowledge of the Western Australian infrastructure market.

The outcome of the transport study provided a number of alternatives, however for Demonstration Plant production volumes, the most efficient route to international markets was via Geraldton port.

Total transport and handling costs have been estimated at $95/t of SOP product, packed in 2 tonne bags and loaded on flat bed trailers. The main road routes for Wiluna to Geraldton are currently permitted for quad road trains. 

Geraldton Port is capable of handling fully loaded Panamax size vessels up to 70,000 tonnes and 225m in length.  The Port handles approximately 19mt per annum of trade per year with significant excess capacity available for handling and storage.

At a slightly higher cost, a bimodal solution is available based on containerised product road hauled to Leonora and then by rail to Fremantle, Esperance or elsewhere from Kalgoorlie.

MINING INFRASTRUCTURE

Lake Way was identified due to its strategic location and significant infrastructure advantages. The Wiluna region is an historic mining precinct dating back to the late 19th century. It has been a prolific nickel and gold mining region and therefore has well developed, high quality infrastructure in place.

Lake Way has some compelling advantages which makes it an ideal site for an SOP operation, including the substantial capital and operating savings from sharing overheads and infrastructure with the Wiluna Gold Mine. This includes potentially the accommodation camp, flights, power, maintenance, infrastructure and other costs. There is also a large mining camp and sealed airstrip at the nearby Mount Keith Nickel Mine.

This proximity to existing infrastructure requires relatively minor area infrastructure upgrades and modifications for the Demonstration Plant development. The site has an excellent freight solution, located 2km from Goldfields Highway, which is permitted for heavy haulage 4 trailer road trains (refer to Transport section). It is also adjacent to the Goldfields Gas Pipeline.

PRODUCT QUALITY AND MARKETING

Fertilisers consist of essential plant nutrients that are applied to farmed crops in order to achieve favourable quality and yield. They replace the nutrients that crops remove from the soil, thereby sustaining the quality of crops, and are considered the most effective means for growers to increase yields.

The key components of agricultural fertilisers are nitrogen (ammonia and urea), phosphates (ammonium phosphates), and potassium (muriate of potash and sulphate of potash). In addition, sulphate has gained increased attention over the past several years due to soils becoming deficient in sulphur (the ‘fourth macronutrient’).

Global fertiliser demand is expected to increase significantly in the coming years due to the world population growth accompanied by decreasing arable land per capita, changes in diet and growth in income. These increases will provide an incentive for farmers to increase fertiliser use for improved yields and quality.

The most widely available source of potassium used by growers is Muriate of Potash (MOP or KCl), with around 65 million tonnes consumed annually. SOP is a speciality type of potassium fertilisers that is produced and consumed on a smaller scale.

MOP is widely used in all types of farming, however it can be detrimental to some plants, especially fruits and vegetables, due to its chloride content. SOP is primarily used as a source of potassium for crops intolerant to chloride. SOP is priced at a premium to MOP, due to supply constraints, high production costs and because of its ability to be used on chloride intolerant crops (such as fruits, vegetables, beans, nuts, potatoes, tea, tobacco and turf grass), which typically sell at sufficiently higher prices to absorb the premium cost.

SOP can be used in most applications where MOP is used and is preferred in many circumstances as it enhances yield and quality, shelf life and improves taste. SOP generally outperforms MOP in terms of crop quality and yield. SOP performs particularly well with crops that have a low tolerance to the chloride in MOP and in arid, saline and heavily cultivated soils. The low volume of SOP consumption relative to market demand is partly a result of the scarcity of reliable SOP supply.

SOP’s premium to the MOP price is correlated to the conversion costs from MOP to SOP (Mannheim Process) where MOP is used as an input in the process. The premium has been around 60% for the past decade. In recent years, this premium has expanded significantly, as decreases in the MOP price have not translated to similar declines in the price of SOP, indicating that the SOP market is supply constrained.

SOP can be sold as a standard powder or as a premium granular or soluble grade product. Granular and coarse SOP is generally priced at a premium. Salt Lake Potash plans to sell at a premium to the market price as a certified organic producer, similar to Compass Minerals.  The primary production of SOP from salt lakes allows for organic certification.

The current spot price for SOP ranges from US$580-US$635 per tonne in the main North American markets, with different (and less visible) prices in other global markets.

The Company’s Fertiliser marketing consultant, Fertiliser Sales Development (FSD) has over 25 years experience in the sales, marketing and distribution of various fertiliser products. FSD expects the long-term price for SOP FOB ex-Western Australia to be at least US$500/t for standard grade.

The Company’s main initial target market is the Asia-Pacific and East-Asia, a region forecasting significant increases in the demand for SOP. SOP production is not easily substitutable and is in supply deficit, therefore the Company is confident in the current and forecasted levels of demand.

Off-take

In April 2018, SLP executed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with Mitsubishi Australia Limited and Mitsubishi Corporation (Mitsubishi). The Offtake Agreement will provide Mitsubishi with sales and offtake rights for up to 50% of the SOP production from the Demonstration Plant, for distribution into Asia and Oceania and potentially other markets. 

Discussions are ongoing with various parties for the balance of the Demonstration Plant production.

ENVIRONMENTAL & SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT

SLP’s consultants Pendragon Environmental under took a gap analysis to identify gaps in historical environmental knowledge, potential issues arising from the approval process, identify statutory approval requirements for the Demonstration Plant and provide a time frame for the environmental approvals.

As the proposed activities are to take place on active mining leases SLP has access to previous completed detailed environmental reports. The key findings for areas that required additional work:

·        Native Terrestrial Flora and Fauna – Ground truthing of specific infrastructure prior to submission of mining proposal.

·        Ground water – water balance and water quality requirements for plant operations.

·        Surface water – drainage study to be incorporated in to final location of trenches and pond layout.

·        Heritage – No registered Aboriginal sites were found within the impact area. Continuing engagement with the Aboriginal Community is required.

PERMITTING AND FISCAL REGIME

The Demonstration Plant will initially be based on Mining Leases held by Blackham Resources Limited, under the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) described in the ASX Announcement dated 12 March 2018.

For supporting infrastructure or areas not included under Blackham’s ground, the Company will obtain Miscellaneous Licences.

The Company has agreed to extend the MOU timeline with Blackham Resources Ltd to 31 August 2018 as drafting of formal Spilt Commodity Agreement progresses.

The Company is also in ongoing discussions with the Native Title holders at Wiluna regarding an Exploration Agreement covering SLP’s exploration permits. We continue to work toward a mutually beneficial relationship with the Wiluna community.

Royalties

Potash has not been produced in Western Australia since 1950. The current royalty legislation does not include any specific rate for potash produced in WA. The ad valorem or value-based rate of royalty, which applies under the Mining Regulations 1981, is applied to a commodity based on the extent to which the commodity has been processed. As the SOP is sold in its final form (not subject to any further refinement or processing before sale to consumers) a royalty rate of 2.5% is expected. 

Other royalties provided for in the Scoping Study estimates include to the holder of Blackham tenements.

PROJECT TIMING

The Company will pursue a staged approach to development of a Demonstration Plant at Lake Way, taking advantage of the unique circumstances of the Williamson Pit to accelerate the production timeline, while also de-risking the project at each stage.

Completion of the Scoping Study provides the basis to now proceed with a Feasibility Study, to be completed in late 2018 or early 2019.

In parallel, SLP and Blackham have applied for a permit to construct the Williamson Ponds, to allow dewatering of the Williamson Pit in time to meet Blackham’s mine plan. Both companies aim to complete the construction and dewatering by late 2018/early 2019, subject to permitting, weather and other constraints.

The Williamson Ponds comprise approximately one third of the total Demonstration Plant pond area and will provide the opportunity to resolve design and construction processes and costs to a very high standard for the Feasibility Study. In order to manage the chemistry of the Williamson brines, ancillary brine trenches will also be required, which will similarly provide a high standard of hydrogeological and construction data.

Williamson brines are the highest grade brine resource in Australia, containing approximately 25kg/m3 of SOP. They are also super-saturated with other salts, boasting an average Total Dissolved Salt content of approximately 30%. This means that the brines will precipitate halite and gypsum salts almost immediately they are pumped from the Pit.

This offers the opportunity to use the Williamson brines to lay down a salt base in the harvest ponds much more quickly than would normally be the case for less concentrated brines. A salt base is an important element of evaporation pond construction, providing a platform or pavement for harvest equipment, and can take many months to develop depending on requirements, brine chemistry and weather.

The very high grade of the Williamson brines also reduces the evaporation time required for precipitation of kainite harvest salts.

Construction of the Williamson ponds, dewatering of the Williamson Pit and the initial evaporation and salt precipitation, will provide a very high level of information and understanding of the parameters for brine extraction and evaporation in an Australian context, at a scale directly representative of the complete operation.  For a very modest capital expenditure, this information will substantially reduce the perceived risk, and improve the financing parameters, for the balance of the project.

[Note that the capital expenditure estimated in the Scoping Study for the full Demonstration Plant evaporation pond system totals $7.8m, and the Williamson Ponds are one third of that area.]

Subject to permitting, performance, weather and other factors, the construction of the balance of the on-lake infrastructure – mainly the remaining ponds and brine trenches – will ideally follow on directly from completion of the Williamson Ponds and the Feasibility Study.

The Study estimates the extraction trench network capital expenditure is a further $1.6m, meaning the total capital expenditure for on-lake infrastructure is $9.4m, slightly less than 20% of the total capex.  If the construction and operation of the Williamson Ponds validates the modelled performance of unlined harvest ponds, then the potential savings from not using partial HDPE liners, will significantly reduce capex for the balance of the pond system.

The longest lead time for the main plant components is 36 weeks, for the crystalliser, which will be fabricated off-shore. The Scoping Study estimates total fabrication and installation time for the process plant at approximately 9-12 months, meaning a decision taken at the anticipated time of completion of the Feasibility Study would result in plant commissioning in early 2020, utilising stockpiled kainite harvest salts.

The Company will continue to investigate opportunities to reduce the development schedule by early ordering of long-lead time items and modular delivery and installation of plant components, an option available for a small scale, skid mounted plant.

The Company’s anticipated delivery schedule is naturally provisional at this stage, subject to permitting, performance, financing, weather and other factors.

SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS

The Scoping Study was prepared at a ±30% accuracy to investigate the technical and economic parameters of a SOP production operation at Lake Way, exploiting the identified brine resources. 

Key inputs into the economic assessment of the Project were based on the following sensitivities:

Operating Cost Analysis

Operating Cost (A$/t)

-30%

20%

-10%

Base

+10%

+20%

+30%

Mine Gate

$176

$201

$226

$251

$276

$301

$326

Transportation & Handling

$67

$77

$86

$96

$106

$115

$125

Royalties

$28

$32

$36

$40

$44

$48

$52

Total

$271

$310

$348

$387

$426

$464

$503

 

Capital Cost (A$m) *

-10%

Base

+10%

+20%

+30%

Direct

A$33.6

A$37.3

A$41.0

A$44.8

A$48.5

Indirect

A$4.7

A$5.2

A$5.7

A$6.2

A$6.8

Growth Allowance

A$5.7

A$6.3

A$6.9

A$7.6

A$8.2

Total

A$43.9

A$48.8

A$53.7

A$58.6

A$63.4

Table 8: Sensitivity Analysis 

SUMMARY OF MODIFYING FACTORS

The Modifying Factors included in the JORC Code have been assessed as part of the Scoping Study, including mining (brine extraction), processing, metallurgical, infrastructure, economic, marketing, legal, environmental, social and government factors. The Company has received advice from appropriate experts when assessing each Modifying Factor.

A summary assessment of each relevant Modifying Factor is provided below.

Mining (Brine Extraction) – refer to section entitled ‘Mining and Scheduling’ in the Announcement.

The Company engaged an independent hydrogeological consultant with substantial salt lake brine expertise, Groundwater Science Pty Ltd, to complete the Mineral Resource Estimate for the Lake Way project. The Principal Hydrogeologist of Groundwater Science, Mr Jeuken, has over 10 years of experience in groundwater resources assessment and management for mining. He has experience in salt lake brine potash evaluation, aquifer testing, wellfield planning and installation for mining, and the development of conceptual hydrogeological models

The hydrological model was produced by the Company in consultation with independent experts. The two methods of extraction outlined in the Announcement are common practice for brine extraction. These extraction methods are used by the three main current operations which include Great Salt Lake in the US, Lop Nur Salt Lake (Luobupo) and SQM in Chile. 

Processing (including Metallurgical) – refer to sections entitled ‘Mining and Scheduling’ and ‘Processing Plant’ in the Announcement.

The Company engaged brine-processing experts Carlos Perucca Processing Consulting Ltd (CPPC) and AD Infinitum Ltd (AD Infinitum) and their principals Mr Perucca and Mr Bravo, who are highly regarded international experts in the potash industry. Mr Bravo previously worked as Process Manager Engineer at SQM, the third largest salt lake SOP producer globally. He specialises in the front end of brine processing from feed brine through to the crystallisation of harvest salts. Mr Perucca has over 25 years of experience in mineral process engineering and will provide high-level expertise with respect to plant operations for the processing of harvest salts through to final SOP product. AD Infinitum and CPPC were responsible for the brine evaporation and salt processing components in the Scoping Study.

Lake Way’s process development relied heavily on experience applied by Wood and specialist consultants (CPPC and Ad Infinitum) who are well experienced from working on similar operations. Production of SOP from lake brines is well understood and a well-established process.

Infrastructure – refer to section entitled ‘Mining Infrastructure’ in the Announcement.

Lake Way’s proximity to the West Australian goldfields means relatively minor area infrastructure upgrades and modifications are required.

The Scoping Study was managed by Wood. Wood is a recognised global leader in potash mining and processing with capabilities extending to detailed engineering, procurement and construction management. Wood are able to leverage an international network, including access to its Centre of Potash Excellence located in Saskatoon, Canada. All capital and operating costs were estimated by Wood.

Transport cost estimates were undertaken by Bis Consulting based on market data, industry databases, industry contacts and Bis’ existing knowledge of the Western Australian infrastructure market.

Marketing – refer to section entitled ‘Product Quality and Marketing’ in the Announcement.

Independent potash market forecasts and assessments were provided by experts FSD, Greenmarkets, CRU International.

FSD’s scoping level assessment of local and regional markets indicates that various markets around the world and particularly in the Asia-Pacific region would absorb the planned production output of the Demonstration Plant either to fill new demand or to substitute lower quality or higher cost supply.

Salt Lake has undertaken initial market discussions with local and international fertiliser industry participants, which have indicated substantive interest in a new and stable supplier of high quality organic SOP from an Australian salt lake project.

The execution of an initial non-binding MoU with Mitsubishi confirmed there is a reasonable expectation the Company will be able to execute off-take agreements with customers.

The current spot price for SOP is around US$625 (FOB Northwest America).

The Company’s target market is the Asia-Pacific, a region forecasting significant increases in the demand for SOP. SOP production is not easily substitutable and is in supply deficit, therefore the Company is confident in the current and forecasted levels of demand.

Salt Lake will continue to focus on developing marketing relationships and discussions with potential additional off-take and trade partners.

Economic – refer to sections entitled ‘Product Quality and Marketing’ in the Announcement.

A detailed financial model and discounted cash flow (DCF) analysis has been prepared in order to demonstrate the economic viability of the Project. The financial model and DCF were modelled with conservative inputs to provide management with a baseline valuation of the Project. Sensitivity analysis was performed on all key assumptions used. Key inputs and assumptions are outlined in Table 1 to allow analysts and investors to calculate Project valuations based on their own revenue assumptions.

The Company engaged the services of a funding and debt advisory firm, Argonaut. Argonaut is a financial advisory and investment banking firm which specialises in the metals, oil & gas and agri-business sectors. Argonaut is well regarded as a specialist capital markets service provider and have raised project development funding (including debt, equity, hybrid instruments and strategic capital/partners) for companies across a range of commodities including substantial experience in the industrial and speciality minerals sector. Following the assessment of a number of key criteria, Argonaut has confirmed in writing that, provided a definitive feasibility study arrives at a result not materially worse than the Scoping Study, the Company should be able to raise sufficient funding to develop the Project.

An assessment of various funding alternatives available to Salt Lake has been made based on precedent transactions that have occurred in the mining industry, including an assessment of alternatives available to companies that operate in industrial and specialty minerals sector. The assessment and advice from Argonaut (referred to above) indicates that financing for industrial mineral companies often involves a broader mix of funding sources than just traditional debt and equity, and the potential funding alternatives available to the Company including, but not limited to: royalty financing; mezzanine finance; prepaid off-take agreements; equity; joint venture participates; strategic partners/investors at project or company; senior secured debt/project finance; secondary secured debt; and equipment leasing. It is important to note that no funding arrangements have yet been put in place, as these discussions will usually commence upon completion of a Feasibility Study with results not worse than this Scoping Study. The composition of the funding arrangements ultimately put in place may also vary, so it is not possible at this stage to provide any further information about the composition of potential funding arrangement.

Since the acquisition of the Project in June 2015, the Company has completed comprehensive exploration programs across the GSLP, with the delineation of Mineral Resources at both Lake Wells and Lake Way, and the successful completion of positive Scoping Studies on Lake Wells and now for the Demonstration Plant for Lake Way. Over the last six months, the Company’s market capitalisation has ranged between A$75m and A$110m.

Salt Lake has a high quality Board and management team comprising highly respected resource executives with extensive finance, commercial and capital markets experience. The Company’s Chairman has previously raised over A$1 billion from capital markets for a number of exploration and development companies.

As a result, the Board has a high level of confidence that the Project will be able to secure funding in due course, having particular regard to:

–    Required capital expenditure;

–    Salt Lake Potash’s market capitalisation;

–    Recent funding activities by Directors in respect of other resource projects;

–    Recently completed funding agreements for similar or larger scale development projects;

–    The range of potential funding options available;

–    The favourable key metrics generated by the Project and GSLP; and

–    Investor interest.

Environmental – refer to section entitled ‘Environmental & Social Impact Assessment’ in the Announcement.

An opportunities and constraints assessment was completed for the Project by Pendragon Environmental, a leading Western Australian environmental management consultancy. Based on the Project’s stage of development, Pendragon Environmental confirmed there are no current impediments on the Project.

To date, SO4 has only undertaken preliminary desktop studies for the purposes of identifying potential environmental opportunities and constraints. Extensive data is available across the Scoping Project area from work undertaken historically by Blackham Resources. The further development of the Project may require additional detailed flora, fauna and other studies; this is dependent on the final design criteria.  

Social, Legal and Governmental – refer to section entitled ‘Permitting and Fiscal Regime’ in the Announcement.

The Company has taken legal advice in relation to relevant Modifying Factors.

Based on the legal advice received the Company considers there is presently no reason to believe that the development of the Demonstration Plant is not able to be developed, constructed and operated on Blackham Resources Limited’s current Mining Leases, subject to obtaining necessary regulatory approvals. 

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

This announcement may include forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based on Salt Lake’s expectations and beliefs concerning future events. Forward looking statements are necessarily subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are outside the control of Salt Lake, which could cause actual results to differ materially from such statements. Salt Lake makes no undertaking to subsequently update or revise the forward-looking statements made in this announcement, to reflect the circumstances or events after the date of that announcement.

COMPETENT PERSONS STATEMENTS

The information in this report that relates to Mineral Resources and Exploration Results for Lake Way is based on information compiled by Mr Ben Jeuken, who is a member Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy and a member of the International Association of Hydrogeologists. Mr Jeuken is employed by Groundwater Science Pty Ltd, an independent consulting company. Mr Jeuken has sufficient experience, which is relevant to the style of  mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity, which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Mr Jeuken consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.

The information in this report that relates to Exploration Targets is extracted from the report entitled ‘Exploration Targets Reveal World Class Scale Potential’ dated 28 March 2018 The information in the original ASX Announcement that related to Exploration Targets or Mineral Resources is based on information compiled by Mr Ben Jeuken, who is a member Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. Mr Jeuken is employed by Groundwater Science Pty Ltd, an independent consulting company. Mr Jeuken has sufficient experience, which is relevant to the style of  mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity, which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Mr Jeuken consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears. The Company confirms that it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in the original market announcement. The Company confirms that the form and context in which the Competent Person’s findings are presented have not been materially modified from the original market announcement.

 

APPENDIX 1 – LAKE WAY BRINE CHEMISTRY ANALYSIS

HOLE ID

East

North

K

(mg/L)

Cl

(mg/L)

Na

(mg/L)

Ca

(mg/L)

Mg

(mg/L)

SO4

(mg/L)

TDS

(g/L)

HA016

234302

7035685

6,130

110,400

66,300

581

6,300

23,600

219

HA013

234890

7035481

6,070

108,500

65,900

623

6,070

24,000

216

HA031

233697

7037711

5,910

117,600

70,200

615

6,940

23,400

227

HA022

234734

7037719

6,550

111,400

68,500

636

6,050

23,600

217

HA017

234302

7035685

6,090

101,600

63,100

664

5,450

24,200

202

HA014

234458

7035223

6,050

104,250

63,900

666

5,620

23,700

206

HA010

235063

7034408

6,350

112,150

68,100

621

6,180

23,900

221

HA012

234299

7033837

6,550

115,700

68,600

574

6,690

25,300

228

HA008

234918

7033057

7,280

121,350

73,900

537

6,530

28,200

241

HA006

235652

7033571

6,910

128,050

78,600

528

7,000

25,500

249

HA003

235863

7032512

7,210

131,450

77,200

499

7,510

26,200

259

HA019

234752

7036712

6,030

113,600

67,600

591

7,010

25,700

225

HA029

231655

7036814

6,730

131,200

79,500

447

8,070

33,000

263

HA024

233715

7039225

6,100

130,850

75,000

536

8,650

25,300

253

HA031

233697

7037711

6,690

117,300

71,100

563

6,220

27,100

232

HA021

233742

7036709

5,960

110,250

65,000

610

6,150

23,300

216

HA002

236273

7032823

7,180

134,900

79,200

482

7,410

26,900

262

HA025

233868

7032968

6,810

126,800

76,500

519

7,160

26,300

248

LYTT002

229968

7036837

7,350

145,050

90,000

367

10,900

38,700

307

LYTT003

230702

7036399

8,160

151,150

91,400

305

12,200

42,600

324

LYTT004

231815

7035595

6,700

126,350

76,200

441

8,090

29,400

261

LYTT005

232341

7035793

6,760

122,700

74,500

553

7,100

25,100

248

LYTT006

232183

7035073

6,970

129,000

78,700

514

7,500

26,600

260

LYTT007

231817

7034412

6,600

130,400

78,100

484

8,010

28,900

266

LYTT012

233601

7037586

6,470

120,100

74,300

575

7,240

25,800

243

LYTT026

234600

7036800

7,060

125,450

77,700

519

7,030

26,200

250

LYTT025

234600

7035600

6,330

115,700

71,500

559

6,960

27,300

235

LYTT024

234600

7034800

6,240

113,400

70,100

581

6,850

26,300

229

LYTT021

234600

7034000

6,390

117,100

71,600

571

6,890

26,000

237

LYTT020

234600

7033200

6,840

124,050

74,900

549

7,020

26,100

249

LYTT016

234600

7032000

6,990

137,650

86,000

458

8,290

29,300

278

LYTT023

235300

7034800

6,510

123,700

72,000

556

6,790

25,100

238

LYTT019

236300

7033200

6,800

121,600

73,500

532

7,040

26,600

246

LYTT017

235300

7032400

7,150

129,450

80,300

498

7,400

27,200

260

LYTT022

235650

7034000

6,630

119,150

74,600

543

7,010

26,700

241

LYTT018

235300

7033200

7,270

128,050

78,500

492

7,340

28,800

261

LYTT013

234890

7035481

6,510

117,750

72,500

562

7,000

25,400

237

LYTT014

234458

7035223

6,840

123,700

76,000

586

7,020

26,100

248

LYTT015

233600

7033200

7,150

128,750

78,900

517

7,300

28,000

259

LYTT027

235511

7040910

7,080

133,850

83,300

390

9,930

37,800

282

LYTT028

237073

7040940

6,360

130,350

80,800

410

10,200

36,900

276

LYTT028

237073

7040940

7,210

145,150

87,000

358

11,600

37,800

304

LYTT030

230700

7041600

7,300

133,500

81,200

362

9,150

33,000

278

LYTT031

229531

7041686

8,760

147,100

89,700

347

11,300

41,100

314

LYTT032

229551

7040432

7,030

137,850

81,900

408

10,400

29,900

281

 

APPENDIX 2 – JORC TABLE ONE

Section 1: Sampling Techniques and Data

Criteria

JORC Code explanation

Commentary

Sampling techniques

Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels, random chips, or specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling.

Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used.

Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public Report.

In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has been done this would be relatively simple (eg ‘reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay’). In other cases more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (eg submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information.

Lake Way

Sampling involved the excavation of 36 test pits over the tenement area to a depth of 4mbgl or weathered basement whichever was encountered first.  Two trenches were also dug to 4m depth, Trench 1 112m long in a north south orientation and Trench 2 100m long in an east west orientation.

 

A brine sample and duplicate were taken from each test pit and trench for analysis.

 

Samples were taken manually by initially rinsing out the bottle with brine from the pit or trench and then placing the bottle in the test pit or trench and allowing it to fill.

Samples were analysed for K, Mg, Ca, Na, Cl, SO4, HCO3, NO3, pH, TDS and specific gravity.

 

Each test pit was geologically logged and a sample taken each 1m depth.

 

Williamson Pit

Samples were taken manually at three locations along the pit lake and at three depths at each location giving a total of 9 sampling locations in total.

At each location a brine sample and duplicate were taken for analysis.

Samples were analysed for K, Mg, Ca, Na, Cl, HCO3, SO4 and NO3

 

Drilling techniques

Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (eg core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc).

Lake Way

No drilling was undertaken. 

 

Test pits were dug with an excavator approximately 2m long x 1m wide x 4m deep.

 

Williamson Pit

No drilling was undertaken. 

 

 

Drill sample recovery

Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries and results assessed.

Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure representative nature of the samples. Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material.

Lake Way

Samples from the test pits were logged each bucket and a representative sample bagged.

 

100% of excavated sample was available for sampling.  The ability to see the bulk sample facilitated the selection of a representative sample.

 

There is no relationship between sample recovery and grade and no loss of material as a result of excavation.

 

Williamson Pit

 

Not Applicable

Logging

Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies.

Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc) photography.

The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged.

Lake Way

The geological logging is sufficient for the purposes of identifying variations in sand/ clay and silt fraction within the top 4m.  For a brine abstraction project, the key parameters are the hydraulic conductivity and storativity of the host rock, which will be determined during test pumping of the trenches.

The logging is qualitative.

The entire pit depth was logged in every case.

 

Williamson Pit

Not Applicable

 

 

 

Sub-sampling techniques and sample preparation

If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core taken.

If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc and whether sampled wet or dry.

For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample preparation technique.

Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages to maximise representivity of samples.

Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in situ material collected, including for instance results for field duplicate/second-half sampling.

Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being sampled.

Lake Way

Not applicable

Not applicable

At all test pits brine samples were taken from the pit after 24hours or once the pit had filled with brine.  The brine samples taken from the pits are bulk samples which is an appropriate approach given the long-term abstraction technique of using many kilometres of trenches to abstract brine from the upper 4m.

All the samples taken were incorporated into a rigorous QA / QC program in which Standards and Duplicates were taken. The samples were taken in sterile plastic bottles of 250ml capacity.

Excavated lake bed samples were sealed in plastic bags.  For all brine samples (original or check samples) the samples were labelled with the alphanumeric code Y8001, Y80002 …

Lake bed samples were labelled with the test pit locator LYTT01, LYTT02 etc. and the depth from which they were taken.

 

Williamson Pit

All the samples taken were incorporated into a rigorous QA / QC program in which duplicates were taken. The samples were taken in sterile plastic bottles of 250ml capacity.

 

For all brine samples (original or check samples) the samples were labelled with the alphanumeric code Y8001, Y80002.

 

Quality of assay data and laboratory tests

The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or total.

For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc, the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc.

Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (ie lack of bias) and precision have been established.

Lake Way

The brine samples were sent to Bureau Veritas Laboratories in Perth, WA with the duplicates being held by SLP.  Every 10th duplicate was sent to Intertek, an alternate laboratory for comparison purposes.

 

No laboratory analysis was undertaken with geophysical tools.

 

Soil samples and laboratory derived hydraulic conductivity, total porosity and drainable porosity samples were analysed by Core Laboratories in Perth WA.  All laboratories used are NATA certified.

 

Williamson Pit

The brine samples were sent to Bureau Veritas Laboratories in Perth, WA a NATA registered laboratory with the duplicates being held by SLP. 

 

Verification of sampling and assaying

The verification of significant intersections by either independent or alternative company personnel.

The use of twinned holes.

Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols.

Discuss any adjustment to assay data.

Lake Way

Not applicable

 

Not applicable

 

All sampling and assaying is well documented and contained on SLP’s internal database

 

No adjustments have been made to assay data

Williamson Pit

Not applicable, no adjustments were made to the data

Location of data points

Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource estimation.

Specification of the grid system used.

Quality and adequacy of topographic control.

Lake Way

All coordinates were collected by handheld GPS.

The grid system is the Australian National Grid Zone MGA 51 (GDA 94)

There is no specific topographic control as the lake surface can essentially be considered flat.

 

Williamson Pit

The pit lake sampling locations were located with a GPS.  Whilst the samples were taken from a boat in the lake, movement was limited as far as possible.

The depth from the pit lake surface to the ground surface was measured from calibrated drone survey footage

When the samples were being taken the depth to the base of the pit was also measured and recorded at each of the three sampling locations.

All coordinates were collected by handheld GPS.

The grid system is the Australian National Grid Zone MGA 51 (GDA 94)

The is no specific topographic control as the pit lake surface can essentially be considered flat.

 

 

Data spacing and distribution

Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results.

Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied.

Whether sample compositing has been applied.

Lake Way

The lake area contained within the Blackham tenement was calculated by digitising the lake surface and removing the area covered by the islands and the dewatered area of the Williamson pit, the approximate area is 55.4km2.  36 test pits and 2 trenches were excavated over the BRT surface resulting in 1 excavation per 1.5Km2. Which is a high density of investigation for a salt-lake and sufficient to establish variations in depth to basement, sedimentology and local hydraulic conductivity.

 

Sample compositing not applicable

 

Williamson Pit

The Williamson pit is orientated north south and is approximately 600m long, 100m wide with a calculated brine volume of 1,150,495m3.  Nine samples were taken giving a sample density of 1 per 128,000/m3 given the limited size of the pit and no observed inflows the sample density was deemed appropriate for this resource.

 

Orientation of data in relation to geological structure

Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of possible structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the deposit type.

If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material.

Lake Way

There are no structural or geological controls with respect to sampling the lake bed sediments.  The variation in depth to basement does control the potential depth of future trench systems to the west of Williamson pit and the main island.

 

Geological influence on the brine is limited to the aquifer parameters of the host rock, namely the hydraulic conductivity, drainable porosity and storativity.

 

Williamson Pit

 

Not Applicable.

Sample security

The measures taken to ensure sample security.

SLP field geologists were responsible for taking the samples and transporting them to the BV lab.

The security measures for the material and type of sampling at hand was appropriate

 

Audits or reviews

The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data.

Data review is summarised in the report and included an assessment of the quality of assay data and laboratory tests and verification of sampling and assaying.  No audits of sampling techniques and data have been undertaken.

 

 

 

 

Section 2: Reporting of Exploration Results

Criteria

JORC Code explanation

Commentary

Mineral tenement and land tenure status

Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmental settings.

The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area.

 

On the 9th March 2018 Salt Lake Potash Ltd. and Blackham Resources Ltd. signed a gold and brine minerals memorandum of understanding.  Under this MOU Blackham has granted the brine rights on its Lake Way tenement free from encumbrances to SLP.

The tenements referred to in the MOU are; Exploration licences E53/1288, E53/1862, E53/1905, E53/1952, Mining Licences, M53/121, M53/122, M53/123, M53/147, M53/253, M53/796, M53/797, M53/798, M53/910, and Prospecting Licences P53/1642, P53/1646, P53/1666, P53/1667, P53/1668.

 

All tenure is granted to Blackham Resources Ltd.

Exploration done by other parties

Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties.

There is a database of approximately 6200 boreholes across Lake Way of which some 1000 are within the Blackham tenement.  The primary source for the information is the publicly available Western Australian Mineral Exploration (WAMEX) report data base.

Recent sterilisation drilling has also been undertaken by Blackham resources to the south and east of the BRT area.

The majority of previous work has been concerned with investigating the bedrock and calcrete for gold and Uranium, it is of limited value in defining the stratigraphy of the lakebed sediments.  The data has been shown to be useful in the determination of the depth to base of lakebed sediments and has been used to develop an overall estimate of the volume of lake bed sediments that has been applied to the mineral resource calculations.

 

Geology

Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation.

The deposit is a salt-lake brine deposit.

The lake setting is typical of a Western Australian palaeovalley environment. Ancient hydrological systems have incised palaeovalleys into Archaean basement rocks, which were then infilled by Tertiary-aged sediments typically comprising a coarse-grained fluvial basal sand overlaid by palaeovalley clay with some coarser grained interbeds. The clay is overlaid by recent Cainozoic material including lacustrine sediment, calcrete, evaporite and aeolian deposits. 

Drill hole Information

A summary of all information material to the understanding of the exploration results including a tabulation of the following information for all Material drill holes:

o   easting and northing of the drill hole collar

o   elevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevation above sea level in metres) of the drill hole collar

o   dip and azimuth of the hole

o   down hole length and interception depth

o   hole length.

If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that the information is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from the understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly explain why this is the case.

No drilling was undertaken. 

36 test pits and 2 trenches were excavated on the lake surface.

All test pit and trench details and locations of all data points are presented in the report.

 

Data aggregation methods

In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques, maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (eg cutting of high grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material and should be stated.

Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high grade results and longer lengths of low grade results, the procedure used for such aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of such aggregations should be shown in detail.

The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values should be clearly stated.

Within the salt-lake extent no low-grade cut-off or high-grade capping has been implemented due to the consistent nature of the brine assay data.

Test pit and trench data aggregation comprised calculation of a hydraulic conductivity for the whole sequence using the Hvorslev (1951) recovery analysis technique.

 

Relationship between mineralisation widths and intercept lengths

These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of Exploration Results.

If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is known, its nature should be reported.

If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there should be a clear statement to this effect (eg ‘down hole length, true width not known’).

The chemical analysis from each of the test pits has shown the that the brine resource is consistent and continuous through the full thickness of the Lake Playa sediments unit. The unit is flat lying all test pits were excavated into the lake sediments to a depth of 4m or basement, the intersected depth is equivalent to the vertical depth and the thickness of mineralisation.

 

 

Diagrams

Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of intercepts should be included for any significant discovery being reported These should include, but not be limited to a plan view of drill hole collar locations and appropriate sectional views.

Addressed in the announcement.

Balanced reporting

Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not practicable, representative reporting of both low and high grades and/or widths should be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of Exploration Results.

All results have been included.

Other substantive exploration data

Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be reported including (but not limited to): geological observations; geophysical survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples – size and method of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock characteristics; potential deleterious or contaminating substances.

All material exploration data has been reported.

Further work

The nature and scale of planned further work (eg tests for lateral extensions or depth extensions or large-scale step-out drilling).

Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions, including the main geological interpretations and future drilling areas, provided this information is not commercially sensitive.

Further trench testing and numerical hydrogeological modelling to be completed that incorporates the results of the test pumping.  The model will be the basis of the annual brine abstraction rate and mine life.

 

 

Section 3: Estimation and Reporting of Mineral Resources (Williamson Pit and Lake Way)

Criteria

JORC Code explanation

Commentary

Database integrity

Measures taken to ensure that data has not been corrupted by, for example, transcription or keying errors, between its initial collection and its use for Mineral Resource estimation purposes.

 

Data validation procedures used.

 

Cross-check of laboratory assay reports and database.

 

Extensive QA/QC as described in Section 3 Sampling Techniques and Data

Site visits

Comment on any site visits undertaken by the Competent Person and the outcome of those visits.

 

If no site visits have been undertaken indicate why this is the cases.

 

A site visit was undertaken by the Competent Person (CP) from 29th to 30th April 2018. The CP visit was documented in Letter Report SLP-18-1-L001 (Groundwater Science, 2018).

 

Geological interpretation

Confidence in (or conversely, the uncertainty of) the geological interpretation of the mineral deposit.

 

Nature of the data used and of any assumptions made.

 

The effect, if any, of alternative interpretations on Mineral Resource estimation.

 

The use of geology in guiding and controlling Mineral Resource estimation.

 

The factors affecting continuity both of grade and geology.

 

The shallow geological profile beneath the lake is relatively homogenous.  The porosity of the material is consistent with depth; hence the geological interpretation has little impact on the resource except to define its thickness.

 

The island is excluded from the resource estimate as access is not permitted.  Mining the Williamson Pit has resulted in an area of approximately 4km2 being dewatered, this areas has also been excluded from the resource estimate.

 

Dimensions

The extent and variability of the Mineral Resource expressed as length (along strike or otherwise), plan width, and depth below surface to the upper and lower limits of the Mineral Resource.

The resource extends beneath 55.4km2 of the Blackham Resources Tenements on Lake Way. The top of the resource is defined by the water table surface; on average 0.3m below ground surface.  The average thickness of the resource is 5.3m as determined from the leapfrog model.

 

The Williamson Pit volume has been estimated as 1.26million m3.

Estimation and modelling techniques

The nature and appropriateness of the estimation technique(s) applied and key assumptions, including treatment of extreme grade values, domaining, interpolation parameters and maximum distance of extrapolation from data points. If a computer assisted estimation method was chosen include a description of computer software and parameters used.

 

The availability of check estimates, previous estimates and/or mine production records and whether the Mineral Resource estimate takes appropriate account of such data.

 

The assumptions made regarding recovery of by-products.

 

Estimation of deleterious elements or other non-grade variables of economic significance (eg sulphur for acid mine drainage characterisation).

 

In the case of block model interpolation, the block size in relation to the average sample spacing and the search employed.

 

Any assumptions behind modelling of selective mining units.

 

Any assumptions about correlation between variables.

 

Description of how the geological interpretation was used to control the resource estimates.

 

Discussion of basis for using or not using grade cutting or capping.

 

The process of validation, the checking process used, the comparison of model data to drill hole data, and use of reconciliation data if available.

 

Brine concentration was interpolated using both Ordinary kriging and Voronoi polygons

 

The thickness of the lakebed sediments was developed using the Leapfrog software package and an inverse distance weighted calculation applied to the WAMEX boreholes database covering Lake Way.

Average test pit spacing was 500m.

No check estimates were available

No recovery of by-products was considered

Deleterious elements were not considered

Selective mining units were not modelled.

Correlation between variables was not assumed.

The geological interpretation from the WAMEX database was used to inform the Leapfrog model which was used to define the thickness of the orebody.

Grade cutting or capping was not employed due to the homogenous nature of the orebody. 

 

Moisture

Whether the tonnages are estimated on a dry basis or with natural moisture, and the method of determination of the moisture content.

Not applicable to brine resources. See discussion of moisture content under Bulk Density

Cut-off parameters

The basis of the adopted cut-off grade(s) or quality parameters applied.

No cut-off parameters were used

Mining factors or assumptions

Assumptions made regarding possible mining methods, minimum mining dimensions and internal (or, if applicable, external) mining dilution. It is always necessary as part of the process of determining reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction to consider potential mining methods, but the assumptions made regarding mining methods and parameters when estimating Mineral Resources may not always be rigorous. Where this is the case, this should be reported with an explanation of the basis of the mining assumptions made.

Mining will be undertaken by gravity drainage of brine from trenches.

Test pumping of two trenches was undertaken to obtain preliminary aquifer characteristics.

Metallurgical factors or assumptions

The basis for assumptions or predictions regarding metallurgical amenability. It is always necessary as part of the process of determining reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction to consider potential metallurgical methods, but the assumptions regarding metallurgical treatment processes and parameters made when reporting Mineral Resources may not always be rigorous. Where this is the case, this should be reported with an explanation of the basis of the metallurgical assumptions made.

The brine is characterised by elevated concentration of potassium, magnesium and sulphate elements and distinctly deficient in calcium ions. Such a chemical makeup is considered highly favorable for efficient recovery of Schoenite from the lake brines (the main feedstock for Sulphate of Potash production), using conventional evaporation methods

Environmen-tal factors or assumptions

Assumptions made regarding possible waste and process residue disposal options. It is always necessary as part of the process of determining reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction to consider the potential environmental impacts of the mining and processing operation. While at this stage the determination of potential environmental impacts, particularly for a greenfields project, may not always be well advanced, the status of early consideration of these potential environmental impacts should be reported. Where these aspects have not been considered this should be reported with an explanation of the environmental assumptions made.

Environmental impacts are expected to be; localized reduction in saline groundwater level, surface disturbance associated with trench and pond construction and accumulation of salt tails. The project is in a remote area and these impacts are not expected to prevent project development.

Bulk density

Whether assumed or determined. If assumed, the basis for the assumptions. If determined, the method used, whether wet or dry, the frequency of the measurements, the nature, size and representativeness of the samples.

The bulk density for bulk material must have been measured by methods that adequately account for void spaces (vugs, porosity, etc), moisture and differences between rock and alteration zones within the deposit.

Discuss assumptions for bulk density estimates used in the evaluation process of the different materials.

Bulk density is not relevant to brine resource estimation.

Volumetric moisture content or volumetric porosity was measured based on determination of 19 samples (average sample spacing 1.5m) to yield an average value of 43% v/v.

Classification

The basis for the classification of the Mineral Resources into varying confidence categories.

Whether appropriate account has been taken of all relevant factors (ie relative confidence in tonnage/grade estimations, reliability of input data, confidence in continuity of geology and metal values, quality, quantity and distribution of the data).

Whether the result appropriately reflects the Competent Person’s view of the deposit.

The data is considered sufficient to assign a measured resource classification to brine within the Williamson Pit shell.

The data is considered sufficient to assign an indicated resource classification to brine within the lakebed sediments within the Blackham Resources tenements excluding the Williamson Pit dewatered area and the area of the island.

The result reflects the view of the Competent Person

Audits or reviews

The results of any audits or reviews of Mineral Resource estimates.

No audit or reviews were undertaken.

Discussion of relative accuracy/ confidence

Where appropriate a statement of the relative accuracy and confidence level in the Mineral Resource estimate using an approach or procedure deemed appropriate by the Competent Person. For example, the application of statistical or geostatistical procedures to quantify the relative accuracy of the resource within stated confidence limits, or, if such an approach is not deemed appropriate, a qualitative discussion of the factors that could affect the relative accuracy and confidence of the estimate.

The statement should specify whether it relates to global or local estimates, and, if local, state the relevant tonnages, which should be relevant to technical and economic evaluation. Documentation should include assumptions made and the procedures used.

These statements of relative accuracy and confidence of the estimate should be compared with production data, where available.

It is expected that all the Williamson Pit brine will be extracted.

For the lakebed sediments the estimated tonnage represents the in-situ brine with no recovery factor applied. It will not be possible to extract all of the contained brine by pumping from trenches. The amount which can be extracted depends on many factors including the permeability of the sediments, the drainable porosity, and the recharge dynamics of the aquifers.

No production data are available for comparison

 

For further information please visit www.saltlakepotash.com.au or contact:

Matt Syme/Sam Cordin

Salt Lake Potash Limited

Tel: +61 8 9322 6322

Jo Battershill

Salt Lake Potash Limited

Tel: +44 (0) 20 7478 3900

Colin Aaronson/Richard Tonthat

Grant Thornton UK LLP (Nominated Adviser)

Tel: +44 (0) 20 7383 5100

Derrick Lee/Beth McKiernan

Cenkos Securities plc (Joint Broker)

Tel: +44 (0) 131 220 6939

Jerry Keen/Toby Gibbs

 

Shore Capital (Joint broker)

Tel: +44 (0) 20 7468 7967

 

Salt Lake Potash #SO4 June 2018 Quarterly Report

The Board of Salt Lake Potash Limited (the Company or SLP) is pleased to present its Quarterly Report for the period ending 30 June 2018.

The Company’s primary focus is progressing the development of a Demonstration Plant at the Goldfields Salt Lakes Project (GSLP), intended to be the first salt-lake brine Sulphate of Potash (SOP) production operation in Australia.

Highlights for the quarter and subsequently include:

LAKE WAY

Demonstration Plant Scoping Study

Ø The Company and its consultants have substantially advanced the Scoping Study for a 50,000tpa Demonstration Plant at Lake Way, with completion expected shortly. 

Process Testwork

Ø A range of process development testwork is continuing, including process pathway modelling by international experts and a bulk sample evaporation trial processing both Lake Way representative brine and Williamson Pit brine. 

Geotechnical Investigations

Ø An initial geological and geotechnical investigation by the Company and Knight Piesold confirmed the availability of in-situ clays amenable for on-lake evaporation pond construction.

LAKE WELLS

Process Testwork

Ø The Company completed pilot scale crystalliser validation testwork at a leading crystalliser vendor in the United States, processing approximately 400 kg of crystalliser feed salt (schoenite concentrate), produced from previous Lake Wells development work at Saskatchewan Research Council (SRC). The testwork successfully produced high quality SOP crystals, representative of a full scale plant product.

LAKE BALLARD

Ø The Company’s Section 18 application over the Lake Ballard and Lake Marmion projects was granted, and the Company mobilised an amphibious excavator to complete the surface aquifer exploration program.

 

LAKE IRWIN

Ø A surface aquifer exploration program was completed at Lake Irwin, comprising of 56 shallow test pits and 5 test trenches. This work provides preliminary data for the geological and hydrological models of the surface aquifer of the Lake, as well as brine, geological and geotechnical samples. 

The Goldfields Salt Lakes Project

The Company’s long term plan is to develop an integrated SOP operation, producing from a number (or all) of the lakes within the GSLP, after confirming the technical and commercial elements of the Project through construction and operation of a Demonstration Plant producing up to 50,000tpa of SOP.

The GSLP has a number of important, favourable characteristics:

Ø Very large paleochannel hosted brine aquifers, with chemistry amenable to evaporation of salts for SOP production, extractable from both  low cost trenches and deeper bores;

Ø Over 3,300km2 of playa surface, with in-situ clays suitable for low cost on-lake pond construction;

Ø Excellent evaporation conditions;

Ø Excellent access to transport, energy and other infrastructure in the major Goldfields mining district;

Ø Lowest quartile capex and opex potential based on the Lake Wells Scoping Study;

Ø Clear opportunity to reduce transport costs by developing lakes closer to infrastructure and by capturing economies of scale;

Ø Multi-lake production offers operational flexibility and protection from localised weather events;

Ø The very high level of technical validation already undertaken at Lake Wells substantially applies to the other lakes in the GSLP; and

Ø Potential co-product revenues, particularly where transport costs are lowest.

Salt Lake Potash will progressively explore the lakes in the GSLP with a view to estimating resources for each Lake, in parallel with the development of the Demonstration Plant. Exploration of the lakes will be prioritised based on likely transport costs, scale, permitting pathway and brine chemistry.

The Company’s recent Memorandum of Understanding with Blackham Resources Limited (see Announcement dated 12 March 2018) offers the potential for an expedited path to development at Lake Way, possibly the best site for a 50,000tpa Demonstration Plant in Australia.

The Company and its consultants have substantially advanced the Lake Way Project Scoping Study, with completion expected in the coming weeks. 

LAKE WAY

Lake Way is located in the Goldfields region of Western Australia, less than 15km south of Wiluna. The surface area of the Lake is over 270km2.

SLP holds two Exploration Licences (one granted and one under application) covering most of the Lake, including the paleochannel defined by previous exploration. The Northern end of the Lake is largely covered by a number of Mining Leases (MLs), held by Blackham Resources Limited, the owner of the Wiluna Gold Mine.

The Wiluna region is an historic mining precinct dating back to the late 19th century. It has been a prolific nickel and gold mining region and therefore has well developed, high quality infrastructure in place.

The Goldfields Highway is a high quality sealed road permitted to carry quad road trains and passes 2km from the Lake. The Goldfields Gas Pipeline is adjacent to SLP’s tenements, running past the eastern side of the Lake.

SLP’s MOU with Blackham provides the basis to investigate the development of an SOP operation on Blackham’s existing Mining Leases at Lake Way, including initially a 50,000tpa Demonstration Plant.

Lake Way has some compelling advantages which make it potentially an ideal site for an SOP operation, including:

Ø Substantial likely capital and operating savings from sharing overheads and infrastructure with the Wiluna Gold Mine, including the accommodation camp, flights, power, maintenance, infrastructure and other costs.

Ø The site has excellent potential freight solutions, adjacent to the Goldfields Highway, which is permitted for heavy haulage, 4 trailer road trains to the railhead at Leonora, or via other heavy haulage roads to Geraldton Port.

Ø A Demonstration Plant would likely be built on Blackham’s existing Mining Licences.

Ø SLP would dewater the existing Williamson Pit on Lake Way, prior to Blackham mining, planned for early 2019. The pit contains an estimated 1.2GL of brine at the exceptional grade of 25kg/m3 of SOP. This brine is potentially the ideal starter feed for evaporation ponds, having already evaporated from the normal Lake Way brine grade, which averages over 14kg/m3.

Ø The high grade brines at Lake Way will result in lower capital and operating costs due to lower extraction and evaporation requirements.

Ø There would be substantial savings to both parties from co-operating on exploration activities on each other’s ground.

Ø The presence of clays in the upper levels of the lake which should be amenable to low cost, on-lake evaporation pond construction.

 

Geological Interpretation

Significant historical exploration work has been undertaken in the Lake Way area focusing on nickel, gold and uranium. The Company has reviewed multiple publicly available documents including relevant information on the Lake Way’s hydrogeology and geology. 

The Department of Mines and Petroleum’s WAMEX database. The database contains more than 6,200 mineral exploration drill holes across the Lake Way area, about 1,000 of which are on the Blackham area.

Groundwater exploration was undertaken at Lake Way in the early 1990s by AGC Woodward Clyde to locate and secure a process water supply for WMC Resources Limited’s Mt Keith nickel operation.  There was a wide and extensive program of exploration over 40km of paleodrainage that focused on both the shallow alluvium and deeper paleochannel aquifers.

The comprehensive drilling program comprised 64 air-core drill holes totalling 4,336m and five test production bores (two of which were within SLP’s exploration licences). The aquifers identified were a deep paleochannel sand unit encountered down the length of the Lake Way investigation area and a shallow mixed alluvial aquifer from surface to a depth of approximately 30m.

Geology

The Lake Way drainage is incised into the Archean basement and now in-filled with a mixed sedimentary sequence, the paleochannel sands occurring only in the deepest portion. The mixed sediments include sand, silts and clays of lacustrine, aeolin, fluvial and colluvial depositional origins. The surficial deposits also include chemical sediments comprising calcrete, silcrete and ferricrete. These sediments provide a potential reservoir for large quantities of groundwater.

The deep paleochannel sand aquifer is confined beneath plasticine clay up to 70m thick. The sand comprises medium to coarse grained quartz grains with little clay – it is approximately 30m thick and from 400m to 900m in width.

Hydrogeology

The shallow aquifer comprises a mixture of alluvium, colluvium and lake sediments extending beyond the lake playa and continuing downstream. Five test production bores were developed by AGC Woodward Clyde, of which two are within SLP’s tenements. Constant Rate Tests (CRT) bore yields ranged from 520 kL/day up to 840 kL/day in permeable coarse-grained sand.

Mineral Resource

The Scoping Study will include the estimate of an initial Mineral Resource on Blackham’s MLs, to support the Demonstration Plant’s brine extraction model. The work includes the collation of extensive historical geological and hydrogeological data.

Process Testwork

The Company has continued a range of process development testwork to provide and validate inputs to the Lake Way Scoping Study production model. The testwork incorporates brines from the Lake itself, as well as the super-concentrated brines from the Williamson Pit.

Initial brine evaporation modelling, conducted by international solar pond experts, Ad Infinitum, indicates the salts produced at Lake Way will be comparable to those produced at Lake Wells and therefore suitable for conversion into SOP. 

International laboratory and testing company, Bureau Veritas (BV), has completed a series of laboratory-scale brine evaporation trials at their Perth facility, under simulated average Lake Way climate conditions. The aim of the BV trials is to monitor the chemical composition of the brine and salts produced through the evaporation process to confirm:

·        Concentration thresholds in the brine chemistry which can be used to maximise the recovery of potassium in the harvest salts and minimise the quantity of dilutive salts fed to a process plant;

·        The quantity and composition of harvest salts which will form the plant feed in commercial production; and

·        The potential for any internal evaporation pond recycle streams that may improve harvest salt recovery.

The laboratory testwork confirmed the modelled brine evaporation pathways. The Williamson pit brine follows a similar evaporation pathway to Lake Way lake brine with similar brine chemistry and salts produced.

The strongly correlated evaporation pathway of the Williamson Pit brine and the Lake Way brine provides an advantage incorporating the Williamson Pit brine into a long-term development model.

LAKE WELLS

Process Testwork

The Company continues a range of process development testwork to enhance the Lake Wells process model.

A large scale, continuous Site Evaporation Trial (SET) at Lake Wells was successfully completed over 18 months of operation under site conditions and through all seasons.

The results of the SET are Australian first and have provided significant knowledge to the Company on the salt crystallisation pathway under site conditions in Australia. 

The SET processed approximately 412 tonnes of Lake Wells brine and produced 10.3 tonnes of harvest salts. Site-produced harvest salts have been used in a range of subsequent process development testwork programs.

The Company has used the harvest salts produced by the SET to perform comprehensive process development testwork at Saskatchewan Research Council (SRC). Most recently, SRC completed locked cycle testwork utilising 1,000kg of harvest salts from Lake Wells SET to produce 400kg of flotation concentrate. Approximately 350kg of the flotation concentrate (crystalliser feed salt) was provided to a globally recognized crystalliser vendor for crystalliser equipment and design testwork.

Mass (kg)

K
(%)

SO4
(%)

Mg
(%)

Cl
(%)

Na
(ppm)

H20
(%)

Crystalliser Feed Salt

356.1

19.3

49.8

6.12

0.34

0.19

24.2

Table 1: Crystalliser Feed Salts

Solubility software modelling was performed to confirm the crystalliser process conditions and expected outcomes prior to any testwork being performed. The testwork consisted of two main phases; an initial glassware test to validate the conditions and a subsequent small scale pilot test to produce a larger product sample.

In both tests parameters such as temperature, slurry composition and brine chemistry were monitored to validate the modelled process.

The glassware and continuous pilot crystalliser tests have confirmed the production of high quality potassium sulphate via the crystallisation process.

K
(%)

K2SO4            (%) equivalent)

Mg
(%)

Cl
(ppm)

Na
(ppm)

Pilot Crystalliser test results

44.5

99%

< 0.25

< 100

< 300

Table 2: Continuous Pilot Crystalliser 

LAKE BALLARD

The Company mobilised an amphibious excavator on the Lake to complete a surface aquifer exploration program. The Company received confirmation from the Minister for Finance, Energy and Aboriginal Affairs that the Company’s Section 18 application over the Lake Ballard and Lake Marmion projects had been granted.

 

The objective of the program is to gather geological and hydrological data about the shallow brine aquifer hosted by the Quaternary Alluvium stratigraphic sequence in the upper levels of the Lake. The program is to evaluate the geology of the shallow Lake Bed Sediments, and to undertake pumping trials to provide estimates of the potential brine yield from trenches in the shallow sediment. The excavator program will also provide important geological and geotechnical information for potential construction of trenches and on-lake brine evaporation ponds.

LAKE IRWIN

Surface Aquifer Exploration Program

Following the initial trench development in 2017, the Company returned to Lake Irwin with the amphibious excavator to undertake a program of test pits and additional trench excavation.

The completed program included 56 test pits and 5 trenches across the lake surface covering both the northern and southern lobes, to provide geological information. Twelve of these pits were slug tested to obtain bulk hydraulic conductivity parameters for the lakebed sediments. The Company plans to run long-term pump tests across the Lake to determine hydraulic conductivity and specific yield.

Geological Interpretation

Lake Irwin (LI) is made up of two distinct areas, Lake Irwin North and South, linked by a very narrow channel. The geology of lake Irwin south comprises a variable thickness of evaporitic (gypsum) sand overlying lacustrine clays to maximum excavation depth.

Based on work completed to date, the thickness of the evaporitic sand layer tended to be greatest in open lake areas and around the margins of islands. Thick evaporitic beds in open lake areas extend from surface to well below the static brine level. The underlying clay is generally red-brown in colour and relatively firm.

Inflow into test pits at Lake Irwin south was generally moderate to high and primarily originating from the surface evaporite sands and some deeper granular/pebble gypsum beds.

The shallow geology of the majority of LI North was similar to that in the narrow channels of LI South. A thin surface crust of halite dominated salt overlying a bed of dark brown clay to sandy clay which, in turn, overlies a red-brown lacustrine clay to maximum excavation depth.  The upper red-brown clay unit often contained a significant portion of large (50-150mm), matrix supported gypsum crystals.

The absence of a significant evaporite sand layer in the northern sediment resulted in slower fill rates in the pits and trenches.

At the northwestern corner of the lake the sedimentary sequence contained fluvial sediments characterised by very soft, unstable, weakly bedded, upward fining clayey sands to sandy clays with intervening beds of pure clay. This material was interpreted to be ox-bow and floodplain sediments marginal to the main river channel. Initial flow into the pits from this looser, sandy material was high.

Underlying these fluvial sediments is a sequence of hard, very dense, clayey coarse sands with occasional beds of rounded pebbles. This coarse-grained material represents the main river channel where it entered the lake. Brine flow in these areas was medium to low.

 

Competent Persons Statement

The information in this report that relates to Process Testwork Results is based on, and fairly represents, information compiled by Mr Bryn Jones, BAppSc (Chem), MEng (Mining) who is a Fellow of the AusIMM, a ‘Recognised Professional Organisation’ (RPO) included in a list promulgated by the ASX from time to time. Mr Jones is a Director of Salt Potash Limited. Mr Jones has sufficient experience, which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking, to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Mr Jones consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.

 

The information in this Announcement that relates to Exploration Results for Lake Way is extracted from the report entitled ‘Initial Results Confirm Lake Way Potential’ dated 26 April 2018 and ‘Emerging World Class SOP Potential Supported by Lake Way’ dated 12 December 2017. The information in the original ASX Announcement that related to Exploration Results, for Lake Way is based on information compiled by Mr Ben Jeuken, who is a member Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. Mr Jeuken is employed by Groundwater Science Pty Ltd, an independent consulting company. Mr Jeuken has sufficient experience, which is relevant to the style of  mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity, which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Mr Jeuken consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears. The Company confirms that it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in the original market announcement. The Company confirms that the form and context in which the Competent Person’s findings are presented have not been materially modified from the original market announcement

 

Table 3 – Summary of Exploration and Mining Tenements

As at 30 June 2018, the Company holds interests in the following tenements:

Australian Projects:

Project

Status

Type of Change

License Number

Area       (km2)

Term

Grant Date

Date of First Relinquish-ment

Interest (%)

1-Apr-18

Interest

 (%)

30-Jun-18

Western Australia

Lake Wells

Central

Granted

E38/2710

192.2

5 years

05-Sep-12

4-Sep-17

100%

100%

South

Granted

E38/2821

131.5

5 years

19-Nov-13

18-Nov-18

100%

100%

North

Granted

E38/2824

198.2

5 years

04-Nov-13

3-Nov-18

100%

100%

Outer East

Granted

E38/3055

298.8

5 years

16-Oct-15

16-Oct-20

100%

100%

Single Block

Granted

E38/3056

3.0

5 years

16-Oct-15

16-Oct-20

100%

100%

Outer West

Granted

E38/3057

301.9

5 years

16-Oct-15

16-Oct-20

100%

100%

North West

Granted

E38/3124

39.0

5 years

30-Nov-16

29-Nov-21

100%

100%

West

Granted

L38/262

113.0

20 years

3-Feb-17

2-Feb-38

100%

100%

East

Granted

L38/263

28.6

20 years

3-Feb-17

2-Feb-38

100%

100%

South West

Granted

L38/264

32.6

20 years

3-Feb-17

2-Feb-38

100%

100%

South

Application

L38/287

95.8

100%

100%

South Western

Granted

E38/3247

350.3

5 years

25-Jan-18

24-Jan-23

100%

100%

South

Application

M38/1278

87.47

100%

100%

Lake Ballard

West

Granted

E29/912

607.0

5 years

10-Apr-15

10-Apr-20

100%

100%

East

Granted

E29/913

73.2

5 years

10-Apr-15

10-Apr-20

100%

100%

North

Granted

E29/948

94.5

5 years

22-Sep-15

21-Sep-20

100%

100%

South

Granted

E29/958

30.0

5 years

20-Jan-16

19-Jan-21

100%

100%

South East

Granted

E29/1011

68.2

5 years

11-Aug-17

10-Aug-22

100%

100%

South East

Granted

E29/1020

9.3

5 years

21-Feb-18

20-Feb-23

100%

100%

South East

Granted

E29/1021

27.9

5 years

21-Feb-18

20-Feb-23

100%

100%

South East

Granted

E29/1022

43.4

5 years

21-Feb-18

20-Feb-23

100%

100%

Lake Irwin

West

Granted

E37/1233

203.0

5 years

08-Mar-16

07-Mar-21

100%

100%

Central

Granted

E39/1892

203.0

5 years

23-Mar-16

22-Mar-21

100%

100%

East

Granted

E38/3087

139.2

5 years

23-Mar-16

22-Mar-21

100%

100%

North

Granted

E37/1261

107.3

5 years

14-Oct-16

13-Oct-21

100%

100%

Central East

Granted

E38/3113

203.0

5 years

14-Oct-16

13-Oct-21

100%

100%

South

Granted

E39/1955

118.9

5 years

14-Oct-16

13-Oct-21

100%

100%

North West

Application

E37/1260

203.0

100%

100%

South West

Application

E39/1956

110.2

100%

100%

Lake Minigwal

West

Granted

E39/1893

246.2

5 years

01-Apr-16

31-Mar-21

100%

100%

East

Granted

E39/1894

158.1

5 years

01-Apr-16

31-Mar-21

100%

100%

Central

Granted

E39/1962

369.0

5 years

8-Nov-16

7-Nov-21

100%

100%

Central East

Granted

E39/1963

93.0

5 years

8-Nov-16

7-Nov-21

100%

100%

South

Granted

E39/1964

99.0

5 years

8-Nov-16

7-Nov-21

100%

100%

South West

Granted

Granted

E39/1965

89.9

5 years

3-May-18

2-Jun-23

100%

100%

Lake Way

Central

Granted

E53/1878

217.0

5 years

12-Oct-16

11-Oct-21

100%

100%

South

Application

E53/1897

77.5

100%

100%

Lake Marmion

North

Granted

E29/1000

167.4

5 years

03-Apr-17

02-Apr-22

100%

100%

Central

Granted

E29/1001

204.6

5 years

03-Apr-17

02-Apr-22

100%

100%

South

Granted

E29/1002

186.0

5 years

15-Aug-17

14-Aug-22

100%

100%

West

Granted

E29/1005

68.2

5 years

11-Jul-17

10-Jul-22

100%

100%

Lake Noondie

North

Application

E57/1062

217.0

100%

100%

Central

Application

E57/1063

217.0

100%

100%

South

Application

E57/1064

55.8

100%

100%

West

Application

E57/1065

120.9

100%

100%

East

Application

E36/932

108.5

100%

100%

Lake Barlee

North

Application

E49/495

217.0

100%

100%

Central

Granted

E49/496

220.1

5 years

17-Dec-17

16-Dec-22

100%

100%

South

Granted

E77/2441

173.6

5 years

09-Oct-17

08-Oct-22

100%

100%

Lake Raeside

North

Application

E37/1305

155.0

100%

100%

Lake Austin

North

Application

E21/205

117.8

100%

West

Application

E21/206

192.2

100%

East

Application

E58/529

213.9

100%

South

Application

E58/530

217.0

100%

South West

Application

E58/531

96.1

100%

Northern Territory

Lake Lewis

South

Granted

EL 29787

146.4

6 years

08-Jul-13

7-Jul-19

100%

100%

North

Granted

EL 29903

125.1

6 years

21-Feb-14

20-Feb-19

100%

100%

 

 

For further information please visit www.saltlakepotash.com.au or contact:

Matt Syme/Sam Cordin

Salt Lake Potash Limited

Tel: +61 8 9322 6322

Jo Battershill

Salt Lake Potash Limited

Tel: +44 (0) 20 7478 3900

Colin Aaronson/Richard Tonthat

Grant Thornton UK LLP (Nominated Adviser)

Tel: +44 (0) 20 7383 5100

Derrick Lee/Beth McKiernan

Cenkos Securities plc (Joint Broker)

Tel: +44 (0) 131 220 6939

Jerry Keen/Toby Gibbs

 

Shore Capital (Joint broker)

Tel: +44 (0) 20 7468 7967

 

 

 

This information is provided by RNS, the news service of the London Stock Exchange. RNS is approved by the Financial Conduct Authority to act as a Primary Information Provider in the United Kingdom. Terms and conditions relating to the use and distribution of this information may apply. For further information, please contact rns@lseg.com or visit www.rns.com.
I would like to receive Brand Communications updates and news...
Free Stock Updates & News
I agree to have my personal information transfered to MailChimp ( more information )
Join over 3.000 visitors who are receiving our newsletter and learn how to optimize your blog for search engines, find free traffic, and monetize your website.
We hate spam. Your email address will not be sold or shared with anyone else.