Home » Posts tagged 'PHE' (Page 4)

Tag Archives: PHE

Fuel for thought: how to transform waste plastic – Powerhouse Energy #PHE

The scale of plastic pollution is so large that recycling is not enough. We need an eco-friendly waste disposal solution — such as turning unwanted plastic into hydrogen fuel.

Keith Allaun, CEO and Director of PowerHouse Energy Group plc, wants to make one thing very clear. It’s not plastic he has an issue with, per se. Plastic is, he says, a life-changing material that has revolutionised agriculture and healthcare, to take just two examples.

The scale of plastic pollution is so large that recycling is not enough. We need another, eco-friendly solution.

Rather it’s the management of plastic that is a major problem. “We have to manage it in a more effective way,” he says. “We are seeing significant disruption in marine eco-systems in particular because of the introduction of plastic into the environment.

If we continue to make single-use plastics at the same pace, by 2050 we are going to be dealing with an ocean that has more plastic in it, by weight, than fish.” 

Turning plastic waste into fuel

Because the UK doesn’t have the capacity to deal with the amount of plastic waste we generate, 500,000 tonnes of it is sent abroad for recycling every year. This is a crazy situation, says Allaun. Firstly, shipping plastic overseas leaves a carbon footprint. Secondly, much of this waste plastic isn’t recycled and ends up in the ocean anyway.

Allaun advocates a novel waste-to-energy solution, which turns unwanted plastic into hydrogen that can be used to fuel road transport and , in the future, hydrogen-powered trains and ferries. It’s an environmentally-friendly waste management approach that removes waste plastic from the eco-system and helps in the fight against climate change. “By displacing fossil fuels, we save in the region of 21,000Kg of CO2 per tonne of hydrogen created,” says Allaun.

Unwanted plastic is a store of clean, hydrogen fuel

Hydrogen is also environmentally advantageous because there are no tail pipe emissions when using it  as a fuel- only water vapor. Waste plastic can be a resource. Plastic is only a waste if we don’t extract the maximum value of that resource and use it responsibly.

Taking waste plastic and turning it into something positive is a compelling model for companies to follow. “We have an obligation to bring some good to this planet and leverage technologies that can responsibly utilise plastic and eliminate it before it reaches the ocean,” says Allaun. “Because once it gets out there, it’s too late.”

Link here to view this article on Media Planet Global Cause

50 nations ‘curbing plastic pollution’ – BBC News

More than 50 nations are taking action to reduce plastic pollution, says the UN in the biggest report so far.

By Roger Harrabin BBC environment analyst

Plastic bag

India will eliminate all single-use plastic in the country by 2022, with an immediate ban in urban Delhi.

The pledge from a nation of 1.3 billion people is the most ambitious of the global plans against plastic pollution.

The UN report also reveals that the Galapagos will ban single-use plastics, Sri Lanka will ban styrofoam and China is insisting on biodegradable bags.

But the authors warn that far more needs to be done to reduce the vast flow of plastic into rivers and oceans.

BBC Science Editor David Shukman explains how plastic moves around the oceans
Image captionBBC Science Editor David Shukman explains how plastic moves around the oceans

Action against plastic waste has many drivers across the world. In the UK it has been stimulated by media coverage.

In many developing countries, plastic bags are causing floods by blocking drains, or they’re being eaten by cattle.

The report says policies to combat plastic waste have had mixed results. In Cameroon, plastic bags are banned and households are paid for every kilo of plastic waste they collect, but still plastic bags are being smuggled in.

In several countries, rules on plastic exist but are poorly enforced.

Plastic pollution is killing animals in the Arctic
Image captionPlastic pollution is killing animals in the Arctic

The report presents an A-Z of 35 potential bio substitutes for plastic. It runs from Abaca hemp (from the inedible banana Musa textilis ) to Zein (from a maize protein).

The list includes rabbit fur, sea grass and foam made with fungus. It mentionsQMilch, a firm that create casein textile fibres from waste milk.

It also highlights Piñatex, a plastic alternative made from pineapple leaves.

Some policy-makers, though, are wary about hyping the potential of bio alternatives.

Early optimism by some environmentalists about biofuels backfired when rainforests were felled to grow palm oil to fuel cars.

Erik Solheim, head of UN Environment, said: “The assessment shows that action can be painless and profitable – with huge gains for people and the planet that help avert the costly downstream costs of pollution. Plastic isn’t the problem. It’s what we do with it.”

The report says levies and bans – where properly planned and enforced – have been among the most effective strategies to curb plastic waste.

But the authors also cite a fundamental need for broader cooperation from business, including obliging plastic producers to take responsibility and offering incentives to stimulate more recycling.

Five ways to break up with plastic
Image captionFive ways to break up with plastic

National actions include:

  • Botswana – retailers charged but no enforcement and controls “failed”.
  • Eritrea – ban on plastic bags and dramatic decrease in drain blockage
  • Gambia – ban on plastic bags, but “reappearance after political impasse”
  • Morocco – bags banned – 421 tonnes of them seized in one year, virtually replaced by fabric
  • Bangladesh – ban on bags but lack of enforcement
  • China – was using three billion bags a year pre-2008. Now there is a ban on thin bags, use decreased 60-80% in supermarkets but not in markets.
  • Vietnam – bags are taxed but still widely used. Government considering increasing tax five times
  • Ireland – tax led to 90% fall in consumption
  • Kenya – cows ingested an average of 2.5 bags in their lifetimes. Now there’s a total ban, and fines and a four-year jail term for making, importing or using them

Follow Roger on Twitter.

Powerhouse Energy #PHE – Clarification regarding University of Chester Thornton Science Park

The Directors of PowerHouse Energy Group plc (AIM: PHE), the UK technology company pioneering hydrogen production from waste plastic and end-of-life tyres, have been made aware of articles in the press relating to the University of Chester’s Thornton Science Park rejection by Cheshire West and Chester Council of certain planning permission applications.

The press articles stating that the Science Park will be required to be dismantled or closed down are inaccurate and do not represent the facts of the situation.

PowerHouse has received written confirmation from the Chief Executive of Thornton Science Park setting out the facts and reassuring the Company that this recent decision by Cheshire West and Chester Council at a planning committee hearing does not relate to the facilities associated with PowerHouse’s Research and Demonstration Unit and consequently, there is no threat to the operation of the Energy Centre at Thornton Science Park and no foreseeable disruption to PowerHouse’s operations at the site.

The Company will continue to actively engage in its extensive test engineering of native and mixed plastic feedstock in support of the commercial design effort currently under way. The Council decision has no impact on our operation or efforts, nor will it effect the siting of our process demonstrator.

PowerHouse and the University of Chester Energy Centre will continue to work successfully together unaffected by this unrelated decision.

Keith Allaun, CEO of PowerHouse Energy Group, stated: “The University intended for there to be tremendous synergy between itself and the tenants of the Energy Centre. We’re confident that such synergy and mutual support will continue between PowerHouse and the Centre. Our engineering operations continue unabated as we move to completion of our commercial design on a daily basis – supported by the empirical data we continue to accumulate though our testing regime – which will continue for the foreseeable future at the Energy Centre.”

For more information, contact:

PowerHouse Energy Group plc
Keith Allaun, Chief Executive Officer
Tel: +44 (0) 203 368 6399
WH Ireland Limited (Nominated Adviser)
James Joyce / Chris Viggor
Tel: +44 (0) 207 220 1666
Turner Pope Investments Ltd (Broker)
Andy Thacker
Tel: +44 (0) 203 621 4120

About PowerHouse Energy

PowerHouse Energy has developed proprietary process technology called DMG© which takes plastic and rubber waste streams and converts them into cost efficient energy in the form of electricity and ultra clean hydrogen gas fuel for use in cars and commercial vehicles (FCEV: Fuel Cell Electric Vehicles) and other industrial uses. The PowerHouse technology is the world’s first proven hydrogen from waste (HfW) process.

The PowerHouse process converts 25 tonne of plastic or rubber waste into 1 tonne H2 per day and 28 MWh per day of electricity.

The PHE process produces low levels of safe residues and requires a small operating footprint, making it suitable for deployment at enterprise and community level.

Dead whale found in Thailand with 17 pounds of plastic in its stomach – NBC News

Article by NBC News
The whale spit out five plastic bags on Friday and later died, officials said. 

 / Source: Reuters

Image: Volunteers and government marine veterinarians from Department of Marine and Coastal Resources rescuing a sick male pilot whale at sea in the coastal area of southern Thailand near the Malaysian border, May 28, 2018.

Volunteers and marine veterinarians from Department of Marine and Coastal Resources attempted to rescue a sick male pilot whale in the coastal area of southern Thailand near the Malaysian border, May 28, 2018. ThaiWhales / AFP – Getty Images

BANGKOK — Some 80 pieces of plastic rubbish weighing 17 pounds were found in the stomach of a whale that died in Thailand after a five-day effort to save it, a marine official said on Sunday.

The pilot whale was discovered on Monday in a canal in the southern province of Songkhla and received treatment from a team of veterinarians.

The whale spit out five plastic bags on Friday and later died, the Marine and Coastal Resources Department said on its website.

An autopsy found another 80 bags and other plastic items weighing more than 17 pounds (8 kg) in the whale’s stomach.

Image: A government marine veterinarian is being helped by volunteers to remove plastics from the stomach of dead male pilot whale at the Marine and Coastal Resource Research and Development Center in Songkla province, Thailand, June 1, 2018.
A government marine veterinarian is being helped by volunteers to remove plastics from the stomach of dead male pilot whale at the Marine and Coastal Resource Research and Development Center in Songkla province, Thailand, June 1, 2018.ThaiWhales / AFP – Getty Images

“This plastic rubbish made the whale sick and unable to hunt for food,” the department said.

Jatuporn Buruspat, head of the department, said the whale probably thought the floating plastic bags were food.

Pilot whales mainly feed on squid, but are known to eat octopus and small fish when squid are not available, according to the American Cetacean Society, a whale conservation group.

Jatuporn said his department planned to raise public awareness of the problem on World Oceans Day on June 8.

“We will use the whale case and invite all sectors to show their intentions on how to reduce the use of plastic in Thailand,” he told Reuters.

Image: Thai Marine Biologist officials rescue an ailing and immobile short-finned pilot whale at a canal in Songkhla province, southern Thailand, May 30, 2018.
Thai Marine Biologist officials rescue an ailing and immobile short-finned pilot whale at a canal in Songkhla province, southern Thailand, May 30, 2018. EPA

Thais use huge numbers of plastic bags but authorities have launched campaigns to try to encourage people to use fewer and to introduce reusable bags.

Globally, eight million tons of plastic — bottles, packaging and other waste — are dumped into the ocean every year, killing marine life and entering the human food chain, the United Nations Environment Programme said in December.

The Death of the Plastic Straw – National Geographic

It’s a growing trend: Hotels, resorts, safaris, and cruises are increasingly banning plastic straws.

Plastic straws jut from cocktails at a resort on the island of Nosy Mitsio, Madagascar. Hotels and resorts are increasingly banning single-use plastics like these straws.
PHOTOGRAPH BY TOMMASO BONAVENTURA, CONTRASTO/REDUX

This story is part of Planet or Plastic?—our multiyear effort to raise awareness about the global plastic waste crisis. Learn what you can do to reduce your own single-use plastics, and take your pledge.

In 2015, a disturbing video of an olive ridley sea turtle suffering from a plastic straw stuck in its nose went viral, changing many viewers’ attitudes toward the plastic tool that is largely a convenience for most people.

But how can the plastic straw—a diminutive item used briefly before being thrown away—cause so much damage? For starters, it easily finds its way into oceans due to its lightweight nature. Once there, it does not biodegrade. Instead, it slowly fragments into smaller and smaller pieces known as microplastics, which are frequently mistaken for food by marine animals.

Secondly, it can’t be recycled. “Unfortunately, most plastic straws are too lightweight to make it through mechanical recycling sorters, so they end up in landfills and waterways and, eventually, our oceans,” explains Dune Ives, executive director of Lonely Whale. The nonprofit facilitated the successful Strawless in Seattle marketing campaign supporting the Strawless Ocean initiative.

In the United States, we dispose of millions of plastic straws each day. In the U.K., at least 4.4 billion straws are estimated to be thrown away annually. Hotels are some of the worst offenders: Hilton Waikoloa Village, which became the first resort on the island of Hawaii to eliminate plastic straws earlier this year, used more than 800,000 straws in 2017.

Of course, straws are just part of the monumental waste that goes into our oceans. “Over the last 10 years, we have produced more plastic than in the whole of the last century, and 50 percent of the plastic we use is single-use and is immediately thrown away,” says Tessa Hempson, operations manager for Oceans Without Borders, a newly launched foundation from luxury safari company &Beyond. “One million seabirds and 100,000 marine mammals are killed annually from plastic in our oceans. Forty-four percent of all seabird species, 22 percent of whales and dolphins, all sea turtle species, and a growing list of fish species have been documented with plastic in or around their bodies.”

But now, the plastic straw has finally started to become an endangered species itself, with some cities in the United States (Seattle, Washington; Miami Beach and Fort Myers Beach, Florida; and Malibu, Davis, and San Luis Obispo, California) banning them, and some countries limiting single-use plastic items, which include straws. BelizeTaiwan, and England are among the latest countries to propose bans.

Still, a company doesn’t have to wait for the government to institute a ban before implementing one on its own. Soneva banned straws in 2008, and Cayuga has been using bamboo straws since 2010. Hotels like these have paved the way for a movement and the travel and hospitality industries are finally starting to catch on.

Hotel brands initiating plastic straw bans include Four SeasonsAccorHotels North and Central America, Marriott International in the U.K., EDITION hotels, the Doyle CollectionSix SensesTaj Hotels Palaces Resorts SafarisExperimental Group, and Anantara. Cruise lines and tour companies including CarnivalHurtigrutenPeregrine Adventures, and Coral Expeditions have reduced or eliminated their use of plastic straws on their ships. And luxury safari companies like &Beyondand Wilderness Safaris are both working toward removing plastic straws from their lodges.

While individual actions can have a significant impact on the enviornment and influence in the industry, a ban from a single hotel chain can remove millions of straws in a single year. Ananatra and AVANI estimate their hotels across Asia used 2.49 million straws in 2017 and AccorHotels estimates using 4.2 million straws in the U.S. and Canada last year as well.

“Plastic straws are one of the worst offenders in terms of plastic pollution. By putting in alternatives and eliminating their use across &Beyond’s lodges, we are doing our part to keep plastic out of the oceans,” says Hempson.

While not using a straw is best, some people prefer them or need them, like those with disabilities or sensitive teeth or gums. If you want to use a straw, reusable metal or glass straws are ideal. Final Straw, which claims to be the first collapsible reusable straw, is currently raising funds through Kickstarter.

Hospitality brands eliminating plastic straws have looked to various disposable alternatives. Paper is popular, with many U.S. establishments using Aardvark to supply American-made, FDA-approved straws that take 30 to 60 days to decompose. Another choice is compostable straws made from PLA (polylactic acid), a plant-based bioplastic made from materials like cornstarch instead of petroleum. These straws are compostable under the proper conditions but do not break down in water.

A more creative option is uncooked pasta, which is currently being used at Paradise Cove Beach Café in Malibu and tested by Terranea Resort in Rancho Palos Verdes, California. At the Taj Exotica Resort & Spa, Andamans, bamboo straws and stirrers are used.

And some establishments are using actual straw as straws, just like when straws first came into use. The Mandrake Hotel in London offers straws made from rye stems, which they get from German company Bio-Strohhalme.

“Most people just don’t think about the effects the simple act of reaching [for] or accepting a plastic straw has on their lives and the lives of generations to come,” says David Laris, chief creative officer and chef at Cachet Hospitality Group, which does not use plastic straws. “The hospitality industry has an obligation to begin reducing the amount of plastic waste it generates.”

Devorah Lev-Tov is a food and travel writer based in Brooklyn; find her on Instagram @devoltv.

Britain faces EU lawsuit and huge fines over illegal air pollution – The Telegraph

By James Crisp, Brussels correspondent

Britain will be hit with European Commission legal action for persistently ignoring EU rules on deadly air pollution, a breach which could result in huge fines from the bloc’s highest court.

The Telegraph has learnt that Britain is among the worst offending member countries that will be hit by new “infringement proceedings” and referred to EU judges in Luxembourg at the end of April.

The majority of infringement proceedings, used to ensure adherence to EU law, are resolved before the commission takes the step of referring the case to the lower General Court of the EU.

Which countries are to be targeted by the regular cycles of lawsuits are a closely-guarded secret but the Telegraph understands the UK is in the commission’s crosshairs after missing air quality targets for the last eight years.

If the UK still doesn’t curb harmful pollutants, which are linked to 400,000 early deaths in the EU and 40,000 in Britain every year, it could ultimately face either a large lump sum fine and a daily penalty in the European Court of Justice.

The exact sum is recommended by the European Commission, which is leading the Brexit negotiations on behalf of the EU, but is likely to cost the British taxpayers millions of pounds.

EU air quality rules demand countries cut exposure to harmful fine particulate matter, such as microscopic specks of dust and soot caused by burning petrol. There are also caps on emissions of particulate matter, ozone and nitrogen dioxide.

Breathing in the particulates can cause respiratory illnesses such as asthma and heart disease, especially in children.

While 23 of the bloc’s 28 member states fall short of the rules, Britain is among the worst offenders.

At the end of January, EU Environment Commissioner Karmenu Vella called a meeting of ministers from the UK, Czech Republic,  Germany, Spain, France, Italy, Hungary, Romania and Slovakia in Brussels.

The commission said the summit was to give the countries a last chance to prove they were serious about taking the steps to bring them into line with the rules.

On Monday, Mr Vella told MEPs in the European Parliament’s environment committee that a number of countries had failed the test.

“We will go ahead and refer these member states to the Court,” the Maltese commissioner said, “We have to take action.”

Without naming the countries, Mr Vella said he would ask that all EU commissioners back his recommendation at their weekly meeting at the end of April.

If they, as expected, back the call it will be the latest embarrassing humiliation for the British government over air pollution.

The government has already made legal history by losing three landmark cases in three years over air pollution to ClientEarth, a NGO of environmental lawyers.

Ugo Taddei, a ClientEarth lawyer, said taking Britain to the European Court of Justice was the only logical step for the commission.

“Our success in the UK’s High Court confirmed that the government is failing to comply with air quality laws – it would be remiss of the environment commissioner to falter now. The UK has had too many chances,” he said.

The most recent defeat was in the High Court in February and means ClientEarth can take the government back to court if it prepares an action plan to reduce pollution that does not go far enough.

The judge said the government’s plan to tackle pollution was “flawed” and “unlawful”.

A joint report by four select committees called for significant improvements to the 2017 Air Quality Plan. The unprecedented joint inquiry branded British air pollution a “national health emergency” and were scathing about the plan.

London broke its annual air pollution limits in February, just 31 days into 2018.

On 19 March this year, campaigners for a group called Stop Killing Londoners were arrested after spraying slogans on offices of London mayor Sadiq Khan.

European cities, such as France, are increasingly turning to free public transport to cut air pollution.

Find the original Telegraph article here

PowerHouse Energy Group #PHE issues 17.89m shares to service providers

PowerHouse Energy Group plc (AIM: PHE), the UK technology company pioneering hydrogen production from waste plastic and end-of-life tyres, announces the issue of 17,894,737 ordinary shares of 0.5p each in the Company to service providers for the settlement of fees.

Of the 17,894,737 Ordinary Shares, 7,894,737 are being issued at 0.76p per Ordinary Share and 10,000,000 are being issued at 0.5p per Ordinary Shares in accordance with the terms of the relevant service agreements.

Application is being made for the admission of 17,894,737 new Ordinary Shares to trading on AIM and it is expected that this will occur on or around 23 May 2018.  These shares will rank pari passu in all respects with the Company’s existing issued Ordinary Shares.

Subsequent to the issue of the New Ordinary Shares, the Company will have 1,550,453,026 Ordinary Shares in issue.

PowerHouse has no shares in Treasury, therefore this figure may be used by Shareholders, from Admission, as the denominator for the calculations by which they will determine if they are required to notify their interest in, or a change in their interest in, the share capital of the Company under the FCA’s Disclosure and Transparency Rules.

For more information, contact:

PowerHouse Energy Group plc
Keith Allaun, Chief Executive Officer
Tel: +44 (0) 203 368 6399
WH Ireland Limited (Nominated Adviser)
James Joyce / Chris Viggor
Tel: +44 (0) 207 220 1666
Turner Pope Investments Ltd (Broker)
Andy Thacker
Tel: +44 (0) 203 621 4120

About PowerHouse Energy

PowerHouse Energy has developed proprietary process technology called DMG® which takes plastic and rubber waste streams and converts them into cost efficient energy in the form of electricity and ultra clean hydrogen gas fuel for use in cars and commercial vehicles (FCEV: Fuel Cell Electric Vehicles) and other industrial uses. The PowerHouse technology is the world’s first proven hydrogen from waste (HfW) process.

The PowerHouse process converts 25 tonne of plastic or rubber waste into 1 tonne H2 per day and 28 MWh per day of electricity.

The PHE process produces low levels of safe residues and requires a small operating footprint, making it suitable for deployment at enterprise and community level.

PowerHouse is quoted on the London Stock Exchange’s AIM Market. The Company is incorporated in the United Kingdom.

For more information see www.powerhouseenergy.net.

Why We’re Giving Up the Plastic Wrapper Around Our Magazine – National Geographic

National Geographic is launching a multiyear ‘Planet or Plastic?’ campaign to encourage consumers to reduce single-use plastics.

BY SUSAN GOLDBERG, EDITOR IN CHIEF

This story is part of Planet or Plastic?—our multiyear effort to raise awareness about the global plastic waste crisis. Learn what you can do to reduce your own single-use plastics, and take your pledge.

Read this story and more in the June 2018 issue of National Geographic magazine.

It’s hard to get your head around the story of plastic. The facts and figures are so staggering as to seem almost fantastical.

Can it really be true that half the plastic ever made was produced in the past 15 years? That a trillion plastic bags are used worldwide each year, with an average “working life” of just 15 minutes? That some nine million tons of plastic waste go into the oceans every year? And that estimates for how long plastic endures range from 450 years to forever?

The answer, unfortunately, is yes— those grim facts, and more, are all true. That’s why we asked writer Laura Parker and photographer Randy Olson to put this global crisis in perspective, in coverage published across our digital platforms and in our June print edition.

The good news is, this crisis can be mitigated. And all of us in this organization—from the National Geographic Society to the broadcast and publishing divisions of National Geographic Partners—want to do our part. With this issue, we’re kicking off a multiyear campaign aimed at educating consumers on the crisis and how they can help reverse the blight of single-use plastic in Earth’s oceans and waterways.

And that’s why, if you’re a subscriber in the U.S., U.K., or India, this month’s issue arrived in a paper rather than plastic wrapper. This change alone will save more than 2.5 million single-use plastic bags every month. We’ve also challenged all our international partners—who publish 36 local-language editions of National Geographic around the globe—to get rid of plastic wrappers by the end of 2019.

That’s just a first step. Because we’re committed to having an impact on this crisis, we’re launching a global campaign. Under the campaign banner of Planet or Plastic? we’ll deploy content across all our platforms to raise awareness and encourage consumers to act.

To build support for the Planet or Plastic? campaign, National Geographic is asking people around the world to pledge to reduce their reliance on single-use plastic. Those who take the pledge will become part of a new global community working to stem the tide of plastics polluting the ocean.

With the launch of the campaign and our June issue, National Geographic has also joined entertainment company Sky Media in supporting Sky Ocean Ventures, an initiative to invest in businesses that can help solve the ocean plastic crisis. National Geographic will contribute scientific expertise, grant and media muscle, and $10 million to help Sky Ocean Ventures identify and champion promising projects and technologies.

We’ll also join forces with like-minded corporations, nongovernmental organizations, and other institutions, in efforts to eliminate single-use plastic and promote recyclability, and we’ll support the National Geographic Society’s network of scientists, innovators, and explorers who are tackling this challenge worldwide. For example, the North Face already is busy reclaiming waste plastic. The outdoor product company is partnering with National Geographic to introduce a limited Bottle Source Collection, featuring shirts made from recycled plastic bottles diverted from National Park waste streams. Look for them in our online shop and at the North Face stores starting May 23.

And reusable water bottle company S’well—which was founded to reduce the use of plastic bottles—will produce a special line of its insulated, stainless steel bottles co-branded with National Geographic, available in our online shop in June.

“Some people deny climate change, but there are no ocean plastic deniers. The problem’s in plain sight.”

And as always, we are proud to collaborate with our colleagues at the nonprofit Society. Starting with an initial expedition in 2019, scientists and explorers will study the type and flow of plastic in a river system to better document how plastic travels from source to sea. Their data gathering and observations will provide us all with fact-based, actionable information to guide our efforts.

With Planet or Plastic? we hope to do nothing less than transform consumer behavior—and we’re starting at home. We’ve hired an environmental consulting firm to conduct an internal audit at our headquarters in Washington, D.C., to assess how our own operations and supply chain use plastic.

After all, it’s the negligent use of plastic that’s gotten us in trouble, not the material itself. As Laura Parker writes in our June cover story, plastics have been a boon to humanity. They helped the Allies win World War II, “eased travel into space, and revolutionized medicine… In airbags, incubators, helmets, or simply by delivering clean drinking water to poor people in those now demonized disposable bottles, plastics save lives daily.”

And yet, as Randy Olson’s jaw-dropping photos show, we have created a plastic apocalypse. Developed nations off-load waste from our convenient lifestyle and foist the cleanup on some of the planet’s most vulnerable people. Our Planet or Plastic? campaign is a call to take responsibility for the messes we’ve already made, and act to prevent more.

Will eliminating a plastic magazine wrapper save the planet? Well, no. But it’s an example of the kind of relatively easy action that every company, every government, and every person can take. And when you put it together, that adds up to real change.

Powerhouse Energy #PHE – Redleaf EV seminar – Which fuel can win

The third speaker at the Redleaf Investor Conference, Keith Allaun the Chief Executive Officer at Powerhouse Energy Group discusses “The role of fuel cells” – talking specifically about the comparison between Hydrogen as a fuel and Electricity, consumer habits and how the cost of production is now much lower.

EU warms up to plastic waste ‘recycling’ as transport fuel – Euractiv

Environmental groups claim so-called “Plastic-to-fuels” distort the concept of renewable energy, and is “inconsistent with EU circular economy and climate policies”. [John Jones / Toolstotal]

A proposal to use non-recyclable plastic waste in the production of transport fuels is picking momentum among EU member states and legislators in the European Parliament, despite warnings from environmentalists.

Old plastic materials that cannot be recycled because they contain too much “impurities” could find a final incarnation in car’s combustion engines, campaigners have said, warning of “a dangerous precedent”.

“It’s very controversial as it could create a precedent for including fossil-based fuels in the renewables and climate policy,” said Janek Vahk, a campaigner at Zero Waste Europe, an environmental campaign group.

“Moreover, it could undermine countries efforts to address the issue of plastic recyclability,” Vahk said.

Waste-based fossil fuels

In its proposal for a revised renewable energy directive, the European Commission listed “waste-based fossil-fuels” among the non-recyclable waste that can be converted into energy, such as renewable electricity or transport fuels.

“‘Waste-based fossil fuels’ means liquid and gaseous fuels produced from waste streams of non-renewable origin, including waste processing gases and exhaust gases,” the Commission said in its original proposal.

An amendment introduced by the European Parliament in a subsequent plenary vote in Januaryfurther fleshed out the proposal by adding waste “produced from solid waste streams” to the definition – in other words, plastics.

The idea is now picking up steam in the EU Council of Ministers, with four member states – the UK, Finland, the Netherlands and the Czech Republic – backing the plan. It gained further momentum after China’s decision to ban all imports of plastics and other recycled waste from Europe and other countries.

But environmental groups are worried and have written to EU legislators saying they were “deeply concerned” about the inclusion of plastics within the definition of renewable fuels.

“We believe that this inclusion is a harmful distortion of the concept of renewable energy, and inconsistent with EU circular economy and climate policies,” reads a letter written by a coalition of environmental groups, sent to EU legislators on 2 May.

“Fuel production from non-renewable solid waste such as plastics is equivalent to the use of fossil sources, and therefore the opposite of renewable energy,” the coalition said.

Extra safeguards considered

Ambassadors from the 28 EU countries are meeting on Tuesday (8 May) to discuss the amended renewable energy directive.

But some members of Parliament are now having second thoughts. “They realise now that this approach could pose some problems and are looking for some safeguards,” Vahk said.

Bart Martens, an aide to Belgian MEP Kathleen Van Brempt, who helped draft the amendment voted on in plenary, said the introduction of waste-based fossil fuels in the renewables directive was always part of the plan.

“The only thing that Parliament did was adding extra safeguards to ensure this respects the waste hierarchy” and prevents unrecyclable plastic waste ending up in incinerators, Martens told EURACTIV, reminding that the compromise amendment was approved by a large majority of political groups in Parliament.

“The idea was to prevent incineration,” the aide explained, saying “a lot of CO2 emissions” can be avoided if non-recyclable plastic waste can be used as transport fuel. “The CO2 savings are potentially very large. The carbon life cycle shows it’s positive for the environment.”

“Of course, it’s up to the negotiators to find a middle ground to ascertain that the waste hierarchy is respected,” Martens added, saying legislators could decide to “rephrase” the definition if necessary.

Martens also insisted that “recycled carbon fuels” will not be counted as renewable energy under the revised EU directive. “They are only included in the blending obligation as an extra way to decarbonise the transport sector” – in particular aviation or shipping, where electrification is more difficult, he told EURACTIV.

A preferable option would have been to include “recycled carbon fuels” under the Fuel Quality Directive, but no revision was foreseen there, Martens further explained. So EU legislators “opted for a more pragmatic approach” by including them under the revised renewable energy directive.

Link here to full article on the Euractiv

I would like to receive Brand Communications updates and news...
Free Stock Updates & News
I agree to have my personal information transfered to MailChimp ( more information )
Join over 3.000 visitors who are receiving our newsletter and learn how to optimize your blog for search engines, find free traffic, and monetize your website.
We hate spam. Your email address will not be sold or shared with anyone else.