Home » Posts tagged 'mineralisation'
Tag Archives: mineralisation
#KDNC Cadence Minerals PLC – EverGreen: LCT Pegmatite & Gold at Bynoe Project
15th January 2025 / Leave a comment
Cadence Minerals (AIM: KDNC) is pleased to announce the successful completion of the 2024 work program at the Bynoe Project by ASX-listed Evergreen Lithium Limited (“EverGreen”) (ASX: EG1). Cadence is an 8.74% shareholder in EverGreen. Link here to view the full Evergreen ASX announcement
Highlights:
• Multiple field programs completed in 2024 have validated the lithium potential at Bynoe, strengthening Evergreen’s confidence in the Bynoe Project’s potential.
• RC drilling of Lithium Aircore targets has confirmed the presence of LCT pegmatites
• Field activities also identified large areas prospective for gold mineralisation, several of which have been drill-tested-assays are due in the first quarter of 2025.
The field programs aimed to build a geological knowledge base, understand the potential for mineralisation, and test several of the priority areas for LCT pegmatites and gold mineralisation.
The work involved geological mapping, rock chip sampling, auger sampling, air-core, RAB and RC drilling. Exploration has identified spodumene-bearing pegmatites in the western part of the lease, adjacent to Core Lithium’s Finniss project. Additionally, the potential for gold mineralisation similar to other parts of the Pine Creek Gold Fields has been recognised. Evergreen awaits assays to confirm the presence of gold in targets identified after fieldwork.
Figure 1: Drill rig with associated support trucks at Bynoe
Field Exploration Programs
Geological Mapping and Rock Chip Sampling Programs
Regional and prospect scale mapping, along with rock chip sampling, was undertaken. The mapping programs identified numerous quartz veins which may be the surface expression of blind pegmatites or potential hosts to gold mineralisation. A total of 217 rock chip samples were taken in the recent program aimed at delineating potential gold hosting quartz veins.
Auger Sampling Program
Auger sampling was carried out in several key areas targeting LCT pegmatites from June to August, aiming to collect geochemical samples for lab analysis and map the host rock types beneath thin cover layers.
The auger program drilled 1,314 m and took 578 samples during 2024. The results identified lithium anomalous zones in the SW of the lease, which received follow-up air-core and RC drilling. Interpretation of the results is ongoing, with re-assaying of selected laboratory pulps for gold (results pending).
RAB / Aircore Drilling
An initial drilling program commenced mid-year and was completed in June and July. This initial program consisted of 6,872 meters and was aimed at testing structures for blind pegmatites in areas not affected by wet field conditions (second-priority areas).
Afterwards, an air core drilling program testing for both LCT pegmatites and gold mineralisation was conducted in September and October across several of the high-priority areas for 6,456 meters.
The completed AC program included: –
· 156 x 2m short holes to test for gold mineralisation across three soil arsenic anomalous trends near
· Core Lithium’s Far East Prospect.
· 32 x 5m vertical short holes to obtain geochemical and lithological samples testing for LCT pegmatites (regional geochemical near surface program to test beneath cover units)
· 109 inclined holes testing for the presence of pegmatites in the west of the lease.
AC drilling identified eleven different pegmatite bodies, two of which, given their timing, received follow-up RC drill testing. The market will be updated once laboratory results are received and interpreted.
RC Drilling
RC drilling was conducted in three areas within EL31774, testing LCT pegmatite and gold targets. This drill program was undertaken late in the year and was interrupted by wet field conditions, which restricted access to many areas. The RC program’s aims were:-
• Test pegmatite targets identified in the AC drilling program;
• Test areas identified as priority gold targets.
Fourteen holes were completed for 1,799 meters drilled before rain interrupted the program.
Holes EBRC001 to 006 targeted pegmatites, and holes EBRC007 to 014 targeted gold.
Results targeting LCT pegmatites proved positive, with pegmatites intercepted in 4 holes. The best result came from EBRC001, which intercepted 5m of spodumene-bearing pegmatite from 91m. EverGreen is considering following up with deeper drilling in 2025 to better understand the extent of the system.
Drilling tested gold targets noted quartz veins with minor sulphides. Assay results for this program are pending and expected within Q1.
For further information contact:
|
|
Cadence Minerals plc |
+44 (0) 20 3582 6636 |
Andrew Suckling |
|
Kiran Morzaria |
|
Zeus Capital Limited (NOMAD & Broker) |
+44 (0) 20 3829 5000 |
James Joyce |
|
Darshan Patel |
|
Fortified Securities – Joint Broker |
+44 (0) 20 3411 7773 |
Guy Wheatley |
|
Brand Communications |
+44 (0) 7976 431608 |
Public & Investor Relations |
|
Alan Green |
Qualified Person
Kiran Morzaria B.Eng. (ACSM), MBA, has reviewed and approved the information contained in this announcement. Kiran holds a Bachelor of Engineering (Industrial Geology) from the Camborne School of Mines and an MBA (Finance) from CASS Business School.
Cautionary and Forward-Looking Statements
Certain statements in this announcement are or may be deemed to be forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are identified by their use of terms and phrases such as “believe”, “could”, “should”, “envisage”, “estimate”, “intend”, “may”, “plan”, “will”, or the negative of those variations or comparable expressions including references to assumptions. These forward-looking statements are not based on historical facts but rather on the Directors’ current expectations and assumptions regarding the company’s future growth results of operations performance, future capital, and other expenditures (including the amount, nature, and sources of funding thereof) competitive advantages business prospects and opportunities. Such forward-looking statements reflect the Directors’ current beliefs and assumptions and are based on information currently available to the Directors. Many factors could cause actual results to differ materially from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements, including risks associated with vulnerability to general economic and business conditions, competition, environmental and other regulatory changes actions by governmental authorities, the availability of capital markets reliance on key personnel uninsured and underinsured losses and other factors many of which are beyond the control of the company. Although any forward-looking statements contained in this announcement are based upon what the Directors believe to be reasonable assumptions. The company cannot assure investors that actual results will be consistent with such forward-looking statements.
#GRX GreenX Metals LTD – GreenX Selected for BHP Xplor’s 2025 Program
6th January 2025 / Leave a comment
GREENX SELECTED FOR BHP XPLOR’S 2025 ACCELERATOR PROGRAM
- GreenX is one of eight early-stage exploration companies selected by BHP to participate in the 2025 BHP Xplor program
- BHP Xplor will provide GreenX with approximately US$500,000 in non-dilutive funding to support and accelerate its exploration plans at the Tannenburg Copper Project during the 6-month period of the program
- Selection for BHP Xplor also gives GreenX access to BHP’s global expertise, networks and partnerships
- BHP Xplor is expected to accelerate the geological concept build-out and exploration timeframe at the Tannenberg Copper Project
GreenX Metals Limited (GreenX or Company) is pleased to announce that following a rigorous selection process, it has been selected as one of eight exploration companies to participate in BHP’s 2025 Xplor program.
The Xplor program was established in 2023 to support promising minerals explorers to accelerate the exploration needed to support the energy transition. Over a six-month program period, BHP Xplor targets development of technical, business and operational excellence within participating companies.
As a 2025 BHP Xplor cohort company, GreenX will receive a one-off, non-dilutive grant of up to US$500,000, and in-kind services, mentorship, and networking opportunities with BHP and other industry experts and investors.
There are no obligations or commitments on GreenX beyond the conclusion of the BHP Xplor program attached to the grant, other than certain exclusivity, pre-emption and data sharing rights as disclosed below.
It is expected GreenX’s participation in Xplor will expedite the build-out of geological concepts and the exploration timeframe at the Tannenberg Copper Project (Tannenberg or Project) in Germany. GreenX intends to use the grant to conduct geophysics programs over the Tannenberg licence area.
GreenX Metals’ Chief Executive Officer, Mr Ben Stoikovich, commented:
“This is an exciting opportunity for GreenX and a strong endorsement of the exploration potential of the Tannenberg project targeting Kupferschiefer style copper mineralisation. Kupferschiefer style deposits are a well-known and prolific subtype of sediment-hosted copper deposit that are the second most prevalent source of copper production and reserves in the world. The Tannenberg license area contains historically producing copper mines and multiple historical drill intercepts, with excellent potential for new discoveries of shallow (50 m to 500 m), large scale and high-grade copper and silver mineralisation, with much of the licence area remaining untested by modern exploration.
We are pleased to be recognised for our approach by BHP, a clear industry leader, and look forward to working with the BHP Xplor team going forward.”
The eight BHP Xplor 2025 cohort explorers were selected from hundreds of applicants.
BHP’s Head of Xplor, Marley Palin, congratulated GreenX, saying:
“The field of applicants for BHP Xplor was extremely strong this year. Successful applicants had to demonstrate not only that their critical-mineral projects were highly prospective but also that they were committed to pushing industry boundaries in their geological concepts and data-gathering, testing and processing to realise the project. GreenX more than met these criteria and we look forward to partnering with them.”
ENQUIRIES
Ben Stoikovich +44 207 478 3900
|
Sapan Ghai +44 207 478 3900
|
Forward Looking Statements
This release may include forward-looking statements, which may be identified by words such as “expects”, “anticipates”, “believes”, “projects”, “plans”, and similar expressions. These forward-looking statements are based on GreenX’s expectations and beliefs concerning future events. Forward looking statements are necessarily subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are outside the control of GreenX, which could cause actual results to differ materially from such statements. There can be no assurance that forward-looking statements will prove to be correct. GreenX makes no undertaking to subsequently update or revise the forward-looking statements made in this release, to reflect the circumstances or events after the date of that release.
The information contained within this announcement is deemed by the Company to constitute inside information as stipulated under the Market Abuse Regulations (EU) No. 596/2014 as it forms part of UK domestic law by virtue of the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 (‘MAR’). Upon the publication of this announcement via Regulatory Information Service (‘RIS’), this inside information is now considered to be in the public domain.
Summary of Exclusivity, Pre-Emption Rights and Data Sharing
Exclusivity
Only in respect of the Project, for the duration of the 6 month program term, GreenX will not, without the prior written consent of BHP:
· undertake or propose to undertake an IPO or any other transaction which is not a Permitted Transaction (Restricted Transaction); or
· solicit or enter into any discussions regarding the foregoing.
A Permitted Transaction is a transaction which doesn’t have the purpose or effect of raising capital in connection with the Project or which is only for general working capital purposes of the business of GreenX.
The Project is the Tannenberg Copper Project in Germany within a defined area as specified in the Xplor program agreement.
Pre-Emption Rights
If during the program term, BHP or a related entity elect to make a non-binding proposal for an investment in the Project or GreenX, BHP has a Right of First Refusal (ROFR) until 12 months after the end of the program term as follows:
· If GreenX or a third party propose a Restricted Transaction, BHP will have the ROFR to negotiate a definitive agreement as the exclusive counterparty regarding any proposed Restricted Transaction on the same terms and conditions as offered in the proposed Restricted Transaction.
Data Sharing
During the program term GreenX commits to provide BHP with certain information including progress reports regarding the Project, technical data obtained and expenditure incurred.
GreenX Option Agreement
The provisions above do not impact GreenX’s rights under the Option Agreement for the Project (refer to announcement dated 2 August 2024).
#GRX GreenX Metals Ltd – High Grade Antimony Identified at Eleonore North
27th November 2024 / Leave a comment
GreenX Metals Limited (GreenX or the Company) is pleased to announce that high grade antimony mineralisation has been identified at the Company’s Eleonore North project (Eleonore North or ELN) in Greenland, based on historical results recently released by the Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland (GEUS). The historical results indicate the potential for a high-grade antimony-gold mineral system at ELN. Antimony prices have been on a rapid uptrend since China announced antimony export controls from 15 September 2024, with antimony prices in the US having rocketed to US$37,500/t from US$18,300/t1 in the past week.
HIGH GRADE ANTIMONY IDENTIFIED AT ELEONORE NORTH PROJECT
· |
GreenX receives outstanding antimony results at Eleonore North project in Greenland. |
· |
Antimony price now US$37,500/t from historical prices of ~US$5,000 to 10,000/t. |
· |
Critical mineral crisis escalating – China has now restricted export of critical and strategic antimony, graphite, gallium, germanium, tungsten, titanium and rare earths. |
· Historical results from GEUS 2008 fieldwork at ELN have been made available and include grab samples from outcropping mineralised veins with individual specimens grading up to 23% antimony (Sb), and other samples up to 4g/t gold (Au).
· Previously reported historical data confirmed the presence of gold and high-grade antimony in outcropping veins at ELN including:
o 14m long chip sample grading 7.2% Sb and 0.53g/t Au2
o 40 m chip line with a length weighed average of 0.78g/t Au2
· Antimony mineralisation has been identified along a ~4km trend in veins and structures, that broadly aligns with previously identified gold veining at surface within a 15km trend.
Figure 1: Newly released GEUS assay results show evidence for high-grade antimony and gold mineralisation above the interpreted Noa Pluton.
· Significantly, GEUS geologist’s identified stibnite (Sb2S3) as the antimony mineral. Stibnite is well-understood and the predominant ore mineral for commercial antimony production.
· Antimony is designated a Critical Raw Material by both the EU and the US, with China being the world’s major antimony ore producer and major exporter of refined antimony oxides and metallic antimony.
· Global strategic interest in antimony has significantly increased in 2024 due to several factors:
o China controls ~50% of global antimony mining, most downstream processing and 32% of global resources according to the Lowy Institute.
o China’s recent export ban on antimony, effective from 15 September 2024, has caused market disruption3.
o Antimony is a crucial material in the defence supply chain, used in various military applications including ammunition, flame retardants, and smart weaponry.
o Antimony is essential in renewable energy technologies including more-energy-efficient solar panel glass and in preventing thermal runaway in batteries.
· The antimony market is expected to grow by 65% between 2024 and 20324. However, the supply side, declining antimony grades and depleting resources for existing mines are becoming increasingly relevant.
o In terms of new deposits, antimony is harder to find than most metals because stibnite has no geophysical electrical or magnetic response
· To aid the Company’s exploration targeting and fieldwork planning for ELN, GreenX’s technical team intend to locate, analyse, and study further historical samples and data within GEUS’s archives in the coming weeks.
GreenX Metals’ Chief Executive Officer, Mr Ben Stoikovich, commented: “Antimony is of critical importance in multiple defence applications and for the energy transition. Antimony features on both the EU and US critical raw materials lists due to China’s dominance of global antimony supply. Whilst we had previously focussed on the ELN project primarily for gold mineralisation, the newly published historical results with out-cropping vein samples grading up to 23% antimony, indicate the potential for ELN to host viable antimony mineralisation. We plan to now re-focus our exploration program at ELN on both gold and antimony targets.“
The Announcement Contains Inside Information
Figure 2: Noa Pluton prospect area within the Eleonore North Licence.
ANTIMONY RESULTS FROM NEWLY PUBLISHED GEOLOGICAL SURVEY ARCHIVE MATERIAL
GEUS’s archives host an extensive collection of rock samples (with and without assays), maps, as well as government and company reports going back many decades. A sub-set of the archive material is available in digital format. GEUS is continuously digitising and publishing its archive material. The newly released data covers 2008 field work at the Noa Dal valley within the Company’s ELN project. Government geologists collected mineralised samples from outcropping veins and scree near to the interpreted Noa Pluton. Selected highlights are presented in Table 1 below.
Table 1: Selected antimony and gold results from 2008 GEUS fieldwork |
|||
Sample # |
Sb (%) |
Au (g/t) |
Field description |
469506 |
23.40 |
0.00 |
Quartz vein with stibnite. Sample from boulder or scree |
496901 |
22.20 |
0.44 |
Massive stibnite from mineralised zone |
496918 |
15.10 |
0.54 |
Quartz vein + galena + chalcopyrite |
469504 |
6.65 |
0.83 |
Shale with stibnite |
496912 |
0.10 |
4.10 |
Clay alteration: hanging wall |
496904 |
0.11 |
4.70 |
Clay alteration: footwall |
496910 |
0.04 |
2.20 |
Intense clay alteration |
These newly released results conform with previously released historical results from the Noa Dal area (previously reported in ASX announcement dated 10 July 2023).
GEOLOGICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF ANTIMONY
GreenX is targeting Reduced Intrusion-related Gold Systems (RIRGS) at ELN. The hypothesised blind-to-the-surface Noa Pluton forms the basis for the RIRGS exploration model. Antimony-gold veins at surface were considered to be supporting evidence for RIRGS at ELN. With the favourable shift in the antimony market, the outcropping veins have become a potentially viable and attractive target.
The antimony-gold mineralisation at ELN could be analogous to Perpetua Resources’ Stibnite Gold Project in Idaho, USA. There, RIRGS and orogenic gold mineralisation styles overprint each other. Prior to the RIRGS model at ELN, the gold-bearing veins at Noa Dal were thought to be of orogenic origin. It is relatively common in gold deposits which are proximal to intrusions to feature characteristics of RIRGS and orogenic gold mineralisation styles.
The scale and potential of the antimony-gold veins will be evaluated with a follow-up investigation in the next phase of fieldwork.
GEUS is in the process of releasing results from regional mapping and sampling surveys from field seasons in 2022 and 2023 across East Greenland. GreenX plans to use the soon-to-be-released data as part of ongoing evaluation of the antimony and gold potential at ELN and the region.
Given recent developments in the antimony market, GreenX’s exploration strategy at the ELN project in East Greenland will continue with a renewed focus on the known Sb-Au mineral systems at the Noa pluton.
ENQUIRIES
Ben Stoikovich Sapan Ghai
Chief Executive Officer Business Development
+44 207 478 3900 +44 207 478 3900
-ENDS-
COMPETENT PERSONS STATEMENT
Information in this announcement that relates to Exploration Results is based on information compiled by Mr Joel Burkin, a Competent Person who is a member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists. Mr Burkin is a consultant engaged by GreenX. Mr Burkin has sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity being undertaken, to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Mr Burkin consents to the inclusion in this announcement of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
This release may include forward-looking statements, which may be identified by words such as “expects”, “anticipates”, “believes”, “projects”, “plans”, and similar expressions. These forward-looking statements are based on GreenX’s expectations and beliefs concerning future events. Forward looking statements are necessarily subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are outside the control of GreenX, which could cause actual results to differ materially from such statements. There can be no assurance that forward-looking statements will prove to be correct. GreenX makes no undertaking to subsequently update or revise the forward-looking statements made in this release, to reflect the circumstances or events after the date of that release.
The information contained within this announcement is deemed by the Company to constitute inside information as stipulated under the Market Abuse Regulations (EU) No. 596/2014 as it forms part of UK domestic law by virtue of the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 (‘MAR’). Upon the publication of this announcement via Regulatory Information Service (‘RIS’), this inside information is now considered to be in the public domain.
Sources:
1 Source: SP Angel 22/11/24 & Asianmetals.com
2 Previously reported – refer to ASX announcement dated 10 July 2023
3 https://chemical.chemlinked.com/news/chemical-news/china-restricts-export-of-antimony-and-related-products
4 https://www.fortunebusinessinsights.com/antimony-market-104295
Appendix 1: Exploration results and JORC Tables
Table 1: Historical GEUS rock samples from 2008
Sample ID |
Easting |
Northing |
Sb (ppm) |
Au (g/t) |
Field Description |
469501 |
-25.0093 |
73.29184 |
85,100 |
0 |
Silicified quartzite with stibnite |
469502 |
-25.0078 |
73.29173 |
39,600 |
0.55 |
Silicified quartzite with stibnite |
469503 |
-25.0054 |
73.29182 |
96,500 |
0 |
Silicified quartzite with stibnite |
469504 |
-24.9471 |
73.2908 |
66,500 |
0.83 |
Shale with stibnite |
469505 |
-25.0675 |
73.30148 |
129,000 |
0 |
Quartzite with stibnite |
469506 |
-25.0675 |
73.30148 |
234,000 |
0 |
Vein quartz with stibnite, Sample from boulder or scree |
469507 |
-25.0669 |
73.30519 |
987 |
Vein quartz with galena and chalcopyrite |
|
469508 |
-24.925 |
73.29301 |
577 |
Silicified limestone breccia |
|
496901 |
-25.0063 |
73.29178 |
222,000 |
0.44 |
Massive stibnite from mineralised zone |
496902 |
-25.0063 |
73.29178 |
50,900 |
0 |
Quartzite breccia + stibnite |
496903 |
-25.0015 |
73.28947 |
274 |
Footwall quartzite |
|
496904 |
-25.0064 |
73.29182 |
1,130 |
4.7 |
Clay alteration: footwall |
496905 |
-25.0063 |
73.29178 |
451 |
1.1 |
Clay alteration: footwall |
496906 |
-25.0063 |
73.29178 |
184 |
0.07 |
Quartzite breccia |
496907 |
-25.0062 |
73.29173 |
62 |
0 |
Quartzite breccia + stibnite |
496908 |
-25.0061 |
73.29168 |
78 |
2 |
Stibnite-rich breccia + heavy alteration |
496909 |
-25.0062 |
73.29166 |
143 |
2.4 |
Clay alteration: hanging wall |
496910 |
-25.0064 |
73.29171 |
383 |
2.2 |
Intense clay alteration: hanging wall |
496911 |
-25.0065 |
73.29166 |
58 |
0.18 |
Quartzite hanging wall |
496912 |
-25.0075 |
73.29166 |
1,080 |
4.1 |
Clay alteration: hanging wall |
496913 |
-24.9465 |
73.29073 |
1,180 |
4 |
Quartzite breccia + alteration |
496914 |
-24.9471 |
73.29088 |
267 |
0.28 |
Quartzite breccia + quartz-veining |
496915 |
-24.947 |
73.29084 |
65,100 |
0.66 |
Quartzite breccia + stibnite |
496916 |
-24.9474 |
73.29085 |
63,700 |
0.65 |
Wall rock quartzite |
496917 |
-25.0657 |
73.30175 |
10,000 |
Stibnite-rich breccia in quartzite. Sample from boulder or scree |
|
496918 |
-25.0658 |
73.30178 |
151,000 |
0.54 |
Quartz-vein + galena + chalcopyrite |
Note: Coordinates are in WGS 84 decimal degree format.
10,000ppm = 1%
JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1 Report
Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data
(Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections.)
Criteria |
JORC Code explanation |
Commentary |
Sampling techniques |
Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels, random chips, or specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling. |
GEUS collected grab samples of in situ and loose rocks. |
|
Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used. |
No QAQC was reported. |
|
Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public Report. In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has been done this would be relatively simple (eg ‘reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay’). In other cases more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (eg submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information. |
Work was not conducted to modern industry standards. |
Drilling techniques |
Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (eg core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc). |
N/A |
Drill sample recovery |
Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries and results assessed.
|
N/A |
|
Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure representative nature of the samples. |
N/A |
|
Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material. |
N/A |
Logging |
Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies. |
Rock grab samples were described in the field and are not used in any estimates or studies. |
|
Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc) photography. |
The logging of rock grab samples was qualitative/descriptive in nature. If photos of the samples exist, they have not been released by GEUS. |
|
The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged. |
N/A |
Sub-sampling techniques and sample preparation |
If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core taken. |
N/A |
If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc and whether sampled wet or dry. |
N/A |
|
For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample preparation technique. |
N/A |
|
|
Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages to maximise representivity of samples. |
N/A
|
|
Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in situ material collected, including for instance results for field duplicate/second-half sampling. |
N/A |
|
Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being sampled. |
N/A |
Quality of assay data and laboratory tests |
The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or total. |
All samples are historical in nature and do not comply with modern QAQC protocols. |
|
For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc, the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc. |
N/A |
|
Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (ie lack of bias) and precision have been established. |
N/A |
Verification of sampling and assaying |
The verification of significant intersections by either independent or alternative company personnel.
|
No verification carried out. |
|
The use of twinned holes. |
N/A |
|
Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols. |
N/A |
|
Discuss any adjustment to assay data. |
N/A |
Location of data points |
Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource estimation. |
Location of samples was collected with a handheld GPS unit. No Mineral Resource estimate is given. |
|
Specification of the grid system used. |
Location data is provided in the World Geodetic System 1984 (WGS 84) in decimal degrees. |
|
Quality and adequacy of topographic control. |
N/A |
Data spacing and distribution |
Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results. |
The samples GEUS collected in 2008 are select rock grab samples. They did not attempt to collect data at regular spacings. |
|
Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied. |
N/A |
|
Whether sample compositing has been applied. |
N/A |
Orientation of data in relation to geological structure |
Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of possible structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the deposit type. |
The grab samples are point data and were likely collected biased to visible mineralisation. They were collected within and adjacent to mineralised veins and fault structures. |
|
If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material. |
No sampling bias. |
Sample security |
The measures taken to ensure sample security. |
The practices of GEUS in 2008 are unknown to GreenX, but are not considered material for the present potential of Eleonore North. |
Audits or reviews |
The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data. |
GreenX is unaware if any audits or reviews were performed but has no concerns about their absence. |
Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results
(Criteria in the preceding section also apply to this section.)
Criteria |
JORC Code explanation |
Commentary |
|
Mineral tenement and land tenure status |
Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmental settings. |
The Eleonore North Project is a result of a scientific and systematic reduction of Greenfield Exploration’s (GEX) ‘Frontier’ Project. Eleonore North comprises two Exploration Licences (MEL2023-39 and MEL 2018-19). The combined spatial area of licences is 1,220.81 km2. The boundaries of Eleonore North Project are defined by the points:
MEL2023-39 (two polygons: 1,189.77 km2) 73.98333 °N 25.30000 °W 73.98333 °N 25.13333 °W 73.95000 °N 25.13333 °W 73.95000 °N 25.01667 °W 73.91667 °N 25.01667 °W 73.91667 °N 24.86667 °W 73.88333 °N 24.86667 °W 73.88333 °N 24.51667 °W 73.86667 °N 24.51667 °W 73.86667 °N 24.48333 °W 73.85000 °N 24.48333 °W 73.85000 °N 24.43333 °W 73.70000 °N 24.43333 °W 73.70000 °N 24.48333 °W 73.68333 °N 24.48333 °W 73.68333 °N 25.01667 °W 73.70000 °N 25.01667 °W 73.70000 °N 25.05000 °W 73.71667 °N 25.05000 °W 73.71667 °N 25.08333 °W 73.73333 °N 25.08333 °W 73.73333 °N 25.21667 °W 73.75000 °N 25.21667 °W 73.75000 °N 25.26667 °W 73.76667 °N 25.26667 °W 73.76667 °N 25.33333 °W 73.78333 °N 25.33333 °W 73.78333 °N 25.38333 °W 73.80000 °N 25.38333 °W 73.80000 °N 25.48333 °W 73.91667 °N 25.48333 °W 73.91667 °N 25.25000 °W 73.95000 °N 25.25000 °W 73.95000 °N 25.30000 °W
73.41667 °N 25.31667 °W 73.41667 °N 25.03333 °W 73.43333 °N 25.03333 °W 73.43333 °N 24.60000 °W 73.23333 °N 24.60000 °W 73.23333 °N 25.60000 °W 73.26667 °N 25.60000 °W 73.26667 °N 25.53333 °W 73.30000 °N 25.53333 °W 73.30000 °N 25.45000 °W 73.31667 °N 25.45000 °W 73.31667 °N 25.31667 °W
MEL 2018-19 (two polygons: 31.04 km2) 73.16667 °N 25.11667 °W 73.16667 °N 25.01667 °W 73.15000 °N 25.01667 °W 73.15000 °N 25.05000 °W 73.13333 °N 25.05000 °W 73.13333 °N 25.15000 °W 73.15000 °N 25.15000 °W 73.15000 °N 25.11667 °W
73.23333 °N 25.05000 °W 73.23333 °N 24.76667 °W 73.21667 °N 24.76667 °W 73.21667 °N 25.01667 °W 73.20000 °N 25.01667 °W 73.20000 °N 25.05000 °W The licences are currently in credit due to previous expenditure. Expenditure above the minimum regulatory requirement is carried forward for a maximum of three years. Eleonore North is in good standing and GreenX owns 100% of the licences following conclusion of a revised option agreement as announced on 15 July 2024..
GreenX will issue a 1.5% NSR for Eleonore North. |
|
|
The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area. |
The licences are in good standing. |
|
Exploration done by other parties |
Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties. |
1953 – lead, copper and zinc bearing veins were discovered in Noa Valley as part of a regional mapping program by Nordisk Mineselskab A/G (‘Nordisk’).
1974 – 1976: Nordisk mapped the Holmesø copper-antimony prospect in Brogetdal, Strindbergland. Geophysical surveying was performed. The outcropping mineralisation was blasted a 100kg bulk sample was retrieved, of which 35kg was sent for analysis. Finally, an attempt was made to drill the mineralisation, and only the top 1.4m of a targeted 17m mineralised horizon was sampled before the rig broke down. Nordisk concluded that the Holmesø mineralisation is epigenetic.
1981 – 1983: Nordisk discovered the two small, high-grade tungsten and antimony-tungsten deposits on Ymer Island. These are respectively known as South Margeries Dal and North Margeries Dal. These deposits were drilled Historical Estimates were made. Economic studies were performed but concluded that more mineralised material was needed. The drilled mineralisation is open at depth and along strike. The historical work on the tungsten and antimony is not material to the understanding of the project’s gold potential.
1984 – 1986: As part of Nordisk’s search for more tungsten mineralisation, a large gold bearing vein was discovered in the southern cliff face of Noa Valley. The mineralisation in the scree was sampled. Geochemical sampling was also performed which identified a 10 to 15 km long multielement anomaly dominated by arsenic and antimony, which have a positive correlation with gold. Nordisk had a strategic shift towards petroleum exploration after this point in time.
1992: With the demise of Nordisk in 1991, the Greenland state owned enterprise, NunaOil A/S in collaboration with Australia’s Pasminco Ltd did additional sampling of the Noa gold veins. The program was successful in finding additional veins in the valley floor and extending the known mineralisation. However, the corporate mandate was for ‘high grade gold’ which it was unsuccessful in locating. This result is unsurprising given that the veins are above the hornfels and correspondingly yield high-grade antimony and low-gold content. GEX expects the gold content to increase, and antimony to decrease at depth towards the causative pluton.
2008 – 2009: GEUS visited Ymer Island and took various rock grab samples in the Noa Dal area. Assay results from these samples were recently made publicly available on the Greenland Portal.
2009: NunaMinerals A/S, a public-private spinout from NunaOil A/S, conducted a heliborne magnetic survey over Margeries Valley and Noa Valley. The purpose of this survey was to directly detect tungsten, and antimony deposits. Neither of the known deposits were detectable using this method, however a distinct circular magnetic feature was identified in Noa Valley. This magnetic feature was interpreted to be a granitic/intermediate intrusion. During this time, samples from the South Margeries Dal deposit were sent for metallurgical analysis, which determined that the material was potentially suited to direct-shipping-ore, and amendable to basic beneficiation methods.
2011: Avannaa Resources Ltd (‘Avannaa’) conducted a basin-wide helicopter supported reconnaissance program. This included visits to the Holmesø mineralisation. Avannaa concluded that the Holmesø mineralisation was epigenetic and likely related to the mineralisation observed on Ymer Island.
2018-2019: Independence Group Ltd (subsequently rebranded as IGO Ltd (‘IGO’) through a joint-venture agreement with GEX, conducted three field programs that were focussed on the sedimentary-hosted copper deposit model. During this time, IGO managed all geological aspects of the program while GEX managed the logistics in 2018 and 2019. IGO visited Noa Valley in 2018 and 2019 but focussed on the north slope away from Noa Pluton, and on areas typified by magnetic highs rather than the lows which define Noa Pluton’s circular magnetic signature. Despite this, quartzite mineralisation reminiscent of Holmesø was identified but no mineralogy is recorded in the documentation. While in the field with IGO in 2019, GEX alerted IGO to the presence of antimony and gold in the south side of the valley, but no commensurate sampling was performed. During the IGO earn-in period, GEX located the historical drillhole collars at North and South Margeries Dal tungsten/antimony deposits.
The Holmesø prospect was visited by IGO in 2018, 2019 and 2022. IGO’s Holmesø sampling did not replicate Nordisk’s high-grade blast/bulk sample, or the drill results. Regional sampling identified diagenetic copper, as well as remobilised epigentic copper that expresses as course blebs of chalcocite within porous, bed-cutting, vuggy conduits.
2022: IGO conducted a structural and geochemical sampling program in Strindbergland (no activity on Ymer Island). This program correctly concluded that the ‘sediment-hosted copper deposit model’ is not a suitable analogy. IGO returned to GEX the licences that were in good standing, with the indebted licences being relinquished by IGO. The remaining licences became the ‘Eleonore North’ project, which is a subset of the original ‘Frontier’ project area.
2023: In May, GEX installed an array of passive seismic nodes on Ymer Island within the licence area. Passive seismic nodes record ambient noise in the crust and accumulate data over many weeks. In September 2023, GEX collected the nodes from Ymer Island. The nodes were returned to the Institute of Mine Seismology (IMS) for data download and processing. IMS produced a 3D velocity model. |
|
Geology |
Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation. |
Eleonore North licences, for the most part, cover Neoproterozoic-aged sediments belonging to the Eleonore Bay Supergroup. These sediments trend from clastics up to carbonates. The lithology of the sediments is not a primary consideration in the targeting of reduced intrusion related gold systems. These sediments are intruded by granites and intermediate intrusives that are somewhat shallowly sourced due the Caledonian Orogenic event. However, geochronology of the South Margeries Dal tungsten indicates that post-orogenic fluid flow occurred. Post-orogenic granitic intrusions are consistent with RIRGS mineralisation, as the decompression allows for the fluidisation of gold in the mantle while providing conduits to surface. Elsewhere, such post-orogenic emplacement is associated with deeply sourced lamprophyres, like those mapped in Noa Valley and Brogetdal. GEX identified for the first time, that ~373 Ma post-orogenic mineralisation event is related to the 385 Ma Kiffaanngissuseq hydrothermal event some 1,000 km to the north. In the north at Kiffaanngissuseq the post-orogenic event was characterised by an east-west fluid flow. In the south in the Frontier region that hosts Elenore North, the post orogenic event was dominated by magmatic intrusions and little hydrothermal activity. Separating the two areas is the poorly understood, high-metamorphic grade Eclogite Province where peak metamorphism is of similar age to the Frontier and Kiffaanngissuseq processes. |
|
Drill hole Information |
A summary of all information material to the understanding of the exploration results including a tabulation of the following information for all Material drill holes: easting and northing of the drill hole collar elevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevation above sea level in metres) of the drill hole collar dip and azimuth of the hole down hole length and interception depth hole length. |
No drilling is reported with these results. |
|
|
If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that the information is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from the understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly explain why this is the case. |
No information was excluded from the announcement. |
|
Data aggregation methods |
In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques, maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (eg cutting of high grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material and should be stated. |
No data aggregation has been undertaken. |
|
|
Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high grade results and longer lengths of low grade results, the procedure used for such aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of such aggregations should be shown in detail. |
No data aggregation has been undertaken. |
|
|
The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values should be clearly stated. |
No metal equivalent results have been reported. |
|
Relationship between mineralisation widths and intercept lengths |
These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of Exploration Results. If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is known, its nature should be reported. |
No drilling is reported with these results. The reported results are grab samples from within or adjacent to mineralised veins and structures. They do not characterise the geometry of the mineralisation. |
|
|
If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there should be a clear statement to this effect (eg ‘down hole length, true width not known’). |
N/A |
|
Diagrams |
Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of intercepts should be included for any significant discovery being reported These should include, but not be limited to a plan view of drill hole collar locations and appropriate sectional views. |
Appropriate maps and tables are included in the main body of this announcement. |
|
Balanced reporting |
Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not practicable, representative reporting of both low and high grades and/or widths should be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of Exploration Results. |
All results are reported in Appendix 1: Table 1. |
|
Other substantive exploration data |
Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be reported including (but not limited to): geological observations; geophysical survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples – size and method of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock characteristics; potential deleterious or contaminating substances. |
All substantive data are reported. |
|
Further work |
The nature and scale of planned further work (eg tests for lateral extensions or depth extensions or large-scale step-out drilling). |
In Noa Valley, the target pluton(s) is constrained by seismic, magnetic and geochemical data. The depth to the pluton is thought to be around 150m below surface based on the seismic results. Field confirmation of potential host structures is warranted ahead of a subsequent drilling program. Future fieldwork will be planned and/or undertaken in conjunction with expert consultant(s).
At the South and North Margeries Dal prospects, a higher resolution digital terrain model should be obtained prior to generating Exploration Targets based on the historical drilling.
Bulk sampling at the prospects will also be considered. |
|
|
Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions, including the main geological interpretations and future drilling areas, provided this information is not commercially sensitive. |
These diagrams are included in the main body of this release. |
|
#GRX GreenX Metals LTD – Extension Of Option Agreement for Eleonore North
28th June 2024 / Leave a comment
Extension Of Option Agreement for Eleonore North Gold Project
GreenX Metals Limited (GreenX or the Company) advises that it has agreed an extension of the Option Agreement (Agreement) with Greenfields Exploration Pty Ltd (GEX), to acquire up to 100% of the Eleonore North gold project (Eleonore North or the Project) in eastern Greenland, from 30 June 2024 to 15 July 2024, while GreenX and GEX negotiate to vary the commercial terms of the Agreement.
As previously announced, Eleonore North has the potential to host a reduced intrusion-related gold system” (RIRGS), analogous to large bulk-tonnage deposit types found in Canada including Donlin Creek, Fort Knox and Dublin Gulch.
Gold mineralisation has been documented at the high-priority Noa Pluton prospect within Eleonore North including:
· Geophysical “bullseye” anomaly 6 km wide co-incident with elevated gold mineralisation from historical geochemical sampling.
· Anomalous gold mineralisation associated with quartz veining exposed at surface over a length of up to 15 km.
· Historical sampling includes 4 m chip sample grading 1.93 g/t Au and 1.9% Sb (refer to Appendix 1 of the Company’s announcement on 10 July 2023).
Eleonore North has potential to host large scale, shallow, bulk tonnage gold deposits. Eleonore North remains underexplored, with the existence of a possible RIRGS being a relatively new geological interpretation based on the historical data. Initial field work consists of a seismic survey to determine the depth from surface to the Noa Pluton to aid in drill targeting.
Figure 1: Eleonore North licence area showing the 6km diameter geophysical anomaly co-incident with gold veining visible at surface over some 15km at the high priority Noa Pluton prospect
The Eleonore North license area contains other gold targets as well as copper, antimony and tungsten prospects. At Holmesø there is copper and antimony mineralisation outcropping at surface. Historical mapping and sampling in the 1970s at Holmesø show a prospective horizon between 15 m and 20 m thick, with per cent level grades for both metals.
Eleonore North provides GreenX with gold exposure in Greenland and complements GreenX’s existing exploration prospect in Greenland, the ARC. There are significant synergies with regards to personnel, logistics and equipment in having multiple exploration projects in Greenland. Field works were conducted during the 2023 field season at Eleonore North, with data collected from the seismic survey presently being analysed to inform follow-on exploration program design.
Greenland is a mining friendly jurisdiction with strong Government support for expanding its mining industry, simple laws and regulations, and a competitive fiscal regime.
The primary target in Eleonore North is the Noa Pluton, followed by the Holmesø prospect and its source intrusion. The Noa Veins provide a near-term drill target, however, the Company’s 2023 field work was focussed on determining the depth of the causative intrusion with greater precision using a passive seismic survey. Once analysed, this information will validate the magnetic interpretation, provide more certainty for a future exploration program, and help identify the size of the intrusion within the well-defined hornfels.
|
|
Figure 2: Map of Greenland showing GreenX’s ARC and Eleonore North license areas |
Figure 3: Map showing prospects and geological features within the Eleonore North license areas |
–ENDS–
Competent Persons Statement
The information in this report that relates to exploration results were extracted from the ASX announcement dated 10 July 2023 which is available to view at www.greenxmetals.com.
GreenX confirms that (a) it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in the original announcement; (b) all material assumptions and technical parameters underpinning the content in the relevant announcement continue to apply and have not materially changed; and (c) the form and context in which the Competent Person’s findings are presented have not been materially modified from the original announcement.
#FCM First Class Metals PLC – Operations update – Coco East and OnGold Earn-in
26th June 2024 / Leave a comment
First Class Metals PLC (“First Class Metals” “FCM” or the “Company”) the UK listed metals exploration company seeking economic metal discoveries across its extensive land holdings, remains focused in northern Ontario, Canada, is pleased to announce that field work on the Coco East base / precious metal property is now underway.
Highlights
· Field work has commenced on the Coco East property, base metal potential
· The Earn-in deal with OnGold Invest Corp (“OnGold”) has been renegotiated, FCM has now acquired 100% of the property as a result the exploration work commitment has been removed.
Marc Sale First Class Metals CEO Commented:
“In true FCM fashion we are endeavouring to put as much of the available funds ‘into-the-ground’, though gold prices are soaring the Coco East property has real potential for base metals. However, the very anomalous gold in lake sediment samples on the OnGold property constitute a significant target which too demands follow-up when appropriate.’
Coco East
The Coco East block of 30 single cell claims covering ~6.3km² situated about 25km north of the town of Terrace Bay. Geologically the property is on the eastern sector of the Big Duck Lake Porphyry. The Big Duck Lake Porphyry contains a number of historic showings as well as the Coco Estelle gold deposit.
The one showing located within the Coco East property boundary, the Big Birch occurrence, where two pits are reported with a 5m spacing, striking east-west. The main pit exposes a 10cm-wide quartz and calcite vein and contains pyrite and possible chalcopyrite mineralisation; historic assay results have returned values of 0.56 g/t Au and 2.83 g/t Ag
Figure 01 Showing the regional setting of the Coco East claim block with Ontario Mineral Index (OMI) showings.
During the 2022 field season, FCM collected 47 rock samples predominantly in the area of the Big Birch occurrence and historical drilling. Over the winter of 2022/23 six lake sediment samples were collected, Assays returned gold and silver grades that were generally in order of the historic samples,
Figure 02 Showing the main target areas, southern sector being gold and northern base metals.
The Coco East property not only has potential for precious metal targets but also base metals. The geophysical anomaly in the northern sector has been interpreted as a potential eastern continuation of the ‘zinc belt’ from the Winston Lake area.
The Winston Lake Mine closed at the end of the 1990s due to low zinc prices. The Winston deposit was mined between 1988 and 1998, producing approximately 3.3 million tonnes of 14 per cent zinc and one per cent copper.
Today, the critical mineral is hovering between US$2,500 and US$3,000 per tonne. Zinc is in demand for renewable energy technologies in wind, solar and battery storage, as well as for the galvanizing, construction and automotive sectors.
A mine feasibility study published in 2022 shows 2.35 million tonnes at 17.9 per cent zinc and 0.9 per cent copper. There are also some precious metals in the mix, including one million gold equivalent ounces at 13 grams per tonne. Source- Metallum Resources: NPV(8) increases to C$383M(1,2) with average EBITDA of C$102m pa(3) for Superior Lake Zinc Project – Junior Mining Network
The focus of the current field exploration programme will be the geophysical anomaly in the northern sector.
OnGold
The project is located roughly 21km southeast from the town of Manitouwadge, Ontario comprising of 163 single cell mining claims covering about 34km2. Limited previous exploration has been focussed to investigate several discreet magnetic anomalies thought to be associated with Ni-Cu-PGE mineralised mafic-ultramafic intrusions. Similar rock types comprise the Tyko, RJ, Smoke Lake and the recently discovered West Pickle massive sulphide discovery, see link below to the full report:
https://www.geologyontario.mndm.gov.on.ca/mndmfiles/afri/data/imaging/20000021101/20000021101_01.pdf
The 103ppb Au lake sediment sample collected by Emerald Geological Services ‘EGS’ in the winter of 2022/23 also now shows the gold potential of the area.
Figure 03 showing the extended North Hemlo claim block with the contiguous 100% owned OnGold claims.
FCM, as part of the due diligence process, conducted an extension lake sediment sampling campaign in April to March 2023 extending from the wider North Hemlo sampling programme. The initial results from this campaign have reported gold grades of up to 103ppb.
Bruce MacLachlan, Principle of EGS was quoted in a previous press release as saying, “To the best of our knowledge the 103ppb Au Lake sediment value is the highest lake sediment value collected in the Hemlo Belt outside of the deposit area”.
While at a very early stage, these initial results are extremely encouraging and add to the potential for the prospectivity of the property.
Figure 04 Showing geophysical targets identified by OnGold as well as location of the lake sediment samples with the very anomalous 103ppb Au result.
The terms of the revised Agreement, which is now a Purchase Agreement, not Earn-In as the property is now 100% controlled by FCM and the annual work requirements are removed:
Structure of Deal
FCM has assumed 100% of the claim block constituting the ‘OnGold deal’, being the previous executed Agreement.
· The claims cells will be transferred to First Class Metals Canada Inc.
· The existing 2% NSR on southern block with 50% buy back for $500k, remain as is but the buy back is transferred to FCM.
· OnGold to be granted a 2% NSR on northern block with 50% buy back of $500k.
· OnGold to be granted £100k shares in FCM subject to the publication of an FCA approved prospectus.
The amendments made to the original deal are advantageous for FCM, as they grant the company 100% control over the property. This development, if further exploration success ensues, is expected to significantly bolster future value potential as complete ownership will be retained solely by FCM.
The original deal is detailed in the RNS published 14 June 2023 polaris.brighterir.com/public/first_class_metals/news/rns/story/xlkm7gw
Admission of Shares
The Company has become aware that 300 ordinary shares of 0.1p each (“Shares”) that were issued in connection of the exercise of warrants announced on 23 January 2023, were not admitted to trading.
Application is therefore being made for 300 Shares to be admitted to trading on the Main Market of the London Stock Exchange which is expected to be on or around 1 July 2024. These shares rank pari passu with the existing Shares of the Company.
Following the issue of the 300 new Shares, the Company’s issued ordinary share capital shall consist of 82,046,029 Shares. This figure of 82,046,029 represents the total voting rights in the Company and should be used by shareholders as the denominator for the calculation by which they can determine if they are required to notify their interest in, or a change to their interest in, the Company under the Financial Conduct Authority’s Disclosure Guidance & Transparency Rules.
Ends
For further information, please contact:
James Knowles, Executive Chairman |
07488 362641 |
|
Marc J Sale, CEO |
07711 093532 |
Novum Securities Limited
(Financial Adviser)
David Coffman/ George Duxberry |
www.novumsecurities.com |
(0)20 7399 9400 |
#SVML Sovereign Metals LTD – Follow-Up Drilling Initiated North of Kasiya
27th March 2024 / Leave a comment
FOLLOW-UP DRILLING INITIATED NORTH OF KASIYA RESOURCE AREA
· Wide-spaced regional follow-up drilling for the Kasiya Project underway focusing on the region to the north of the current resource footprint, with results from the drill program expected in the coming weeks
· Recently reported reconnaissance drilling to the south identified an 8km extension of mineralisation which remains open along strike and at depth
· Kasiya is already the largest natural rutile deposit and second-largest flake graphite deposit in the world
· Kasiya’s current MRE of 1.8 Billion tonnes at 1.0% rutile and 1.4% graphite comprises broad and contiguous zones of high-grade rutile and graphite that occur across an area of over 201km2
· Optimisation program for the Kasiya Project continues in conjunction with our strategic investor, Rio Tinto
Sovereign Metals Limited (ASX:SVM; AIM:SVML) (the Company or Sovereign) is pleased to report that the Company has initiated a follow-up 400 metre spaced drill program at its tier one Kasiya Rutile-Graphite Project (Kasiya) in Malawi. The program will focus on determining the boundaries and extent of mineralisation north of the known Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE) area.
The 70+ hole hand-auger drill program has been designed to target areas where mineralisation was identified in earlier wide-spaced regional hand-auger drilling. The target area is up to 20km north of the current MRE boundary. Drilling is currently underway and will be completed in the coming weeks. Four hand-auger teams have been deployed under the supervision of Sovereign’s in-country technical team.
Samples will be initially processed in the Company’s Lilongwe own lab facility and then shipped for final analysis at certified international laboratories. Results from the drill program are expected in the coming weeks.
SOUTHERN EXTENSION
In February 2024, the Company announced regional hand-auger drilling south of the Kasiya MRE footprint had identified significant strike extensions of approximately 8km across a number of parallel mineralised zones ranging from 400m to 2km in width.
All newly defined mineralisation in the south remains open at depth due to the limitations of the hand-auger drilling method but are expected to continue to the saprock boundary normally between 20 and 30 vertical metres from surface. The multiple mineralised zones identified remain open along strike both to the north and south.
These results indicate the potential to expand the already significant, high-grade rutile and graphite MRE at Kasiya.
Figure 1: Southern mineralised extensions at Kasiya
ENQUIRIES
Frank Eagar (South Africa/Malawi) +61(8) 9322 6322 |
Sam Cordin (Perth) |
Sapan Ghai (London)
|
Nominated Adviser on AIM and Joint Broker |
|
SP Angel Corporate Finance LLP |
+44 20 3470 0470 |
Ewan Leggat Charlie Bouverat Harry Davies-Ball |
|
|
|
Joint Brokers |
|
Stifel |
+44 20 7710 7600 |
Varun Talwar |
|
Ashton Clanfield |
|
|
|
Berenberg |
+44 20 3207 7800 |
Matthew Armitt |
|
Jennifer Lee |
|
|
|
Buchanan |
+ 44 20 7466 5000 |
Competent Person Statement
The information in this announcement that relates to the Exploration Results is extracted from the announcement dated 1 February 2024 entitled ‘Extensions to Rutile & Graphite Mineralisation at Kasiya’. which is available to view at www.sovereignmetals.com.au. Sovereign confirms that a) it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in the original announcement; b) all material assumptions included in the original announcement continue to apply and have not materially changed; and c) the form and context in which the relevant Competent Persons’ findings are presented in this announcement have not been materially changed from the original announcement.
The information in this announcement that relates to the Mineral Resource Estimate is extracted from an announcement dated 5 April 2023 entitled ‘Kasiya Indicated Resource Increased by over 80%’ which is available to view at www.sovereignmetals.com.au and is based on, and fairly represents information compiled by Mr Richard Stockwell, a Competent Person, who is a fellow of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (AIG). Mr Stockwell is a principal of Placer Consulting Pty Ltd, an independent consulting company. The original announcement is available to view on www.sovereignmetals.com.au. Sovereign confirms that a) it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in the original announcement; b) all material assumptions included in the original announcement continue to apply and have not materially changed; and c) the form and context in which the relevant Competent Persons’ findings are presented in this announcement have not been materially changed from the original announcement.
The information in this announcement that relates to Production Targets, Ore Reserves, Processing, Infrastructure and Capital Operating Costs, Metallurgy (rutile and graphite) is extracted from an announcement dated 28 September 2023 entitled ‘Kasiya Pre-Feasibility Study Results’ which is available to view at www.sovereignmetals.com.au and is based on, and fairly represents information compiled by . Sovereign confirms that: a) it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in the original announcement; b) all material assumptions and technical parameters underpinning the Production Target, and related forecast financial information derived from the Production Target included in the original announcement continue to apply and have not materially changed; and c) the form and context in which the relevant Competent Persons’ findings are presented in this presentation have not been materially modified from the original announcement.
Ore Reserve for the Kasiya Deposit |
|
||||||
Classification |
Tonnes |
Rutile Grade |
Contained Rutile |
Graphite Grade (TGC) (%) |
Contained Graphite |
RutEq. Grade* |
|
Proved |
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
|
Probable |
538 |
1.03% |
5.5 |
1.66% |
8.9 |
2.00% |
|
Total |
538 |
1.03% |
5.5 |
1.66% |
8.9 |
2.00% |
|
* RutEq. Formula: Rutile Grade x Recovery (100%) x Rutile Price (US$1,484/t) + Graphite Grade x Recovery (67.5%) x Graphite Price (US$1,290/t) / Rutile Price (US$1,484/t). All assumptions are taken from the PFS ** Any minor summation inconsistencies are due to rounding
Kasiya Total Indicated + Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate at 0.7% rutile cut-off grade |
|||||
Classification |
Resource |
Rutile Grade |
Contained Rutile |
Graphite Grade (TGC) (%) |
Contained Graphite |
Indicated |
1,200 |
1.0% |
12.2 |
1.5% |
18.0 |
Inferred |
609 |
0.9% |
5.7 |
1.1% |
6.5 |
Total |
1,809 |
1.0% |
17.9 |
1.4% |
24.4 |
Forward Looking Statement
This release may include forward-looking statements, which may be identified by words such as “expects”, “anticipates”, “believes”, “projects”, “plans”, and similar expressions. These forward-looking statements are based on Sovereign’s expectations and beliefs concerning future events. Forward looking statements are necessarily subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are outside the control of Sovereign, which could cause actual results to differ materially from such statements. There can be no assurance that forward-looking statements will prove to be correct. Sovereign makes no undertaking to subsequently update or revise the forward-looking statements made in this release, to reflect the circumstances or events after the date of that release.
#SVML Sovereign Metals LTD – Extensions To Rutile & Graphite Mineralisation
1st February 2024 / Leave a comment
EXTENSIONS TO RUTILE & GRAPHITE MINERALISATION AT KASIYA
· Wide-spaced regional reconnaissance drilling, outside the current JORC (2012) compliant Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE) area, identifies a 8km extension of mineralisation to the south which remains open along strike and at depth
· Results are testament to the world-class scale of the Kasiya deposit and demonstrate potential for a future increase of the Kasiya’s MRE, which is already the largest natural rutile deposit and second largest flake graphite deposit in the world
· Kasiya’s current MRE of 1.8 Billion tonnes at 1.0% rutile and 1.4% graphite comprises broad and contiguous zones of high-grade rutile and graphite that occur across an area of over 201km2
· Current focus at Kasiya remains the ongoing Optimisation Study alongside strategic investor Rio Tinto and permitting work streams working with the Malawian Interministerial Committee
Sovereign Metals Limited (ASX:SVM; AIM:SVML) (the Company or Sovereign) is pleased to report southern extensions to the mineralised area at Kasiya. Hand-auger drilling has identified a number of zones ranging from ~400m to 2km wide over a strike length of approximately 8km. These results indicate potential to expand the already significant, high-grade rutile and graphite Mineral Resource Estimate at Kasiya.
Results of the Pre Feasibility Study (PFS) released in late 2023 demonstrated Kasiya’s potential to become the world’s largest rutile producer at an average of 222kt per annum and one of the world’s largest natural graphite producers outside of China at an average of 244kt per annum based on an initial 25 year life-of-mine (LOM).
The Kasiya PFS delivered compelling economics with a post-tax NPV8 of US$1.6 Billion and post-tax IRR of 28%. This long-life, multi-generational operation was modelled to initially generate over US$16 Billion of revenue and provide an average annual EBITDA of US$415 Million per annum.
The PFS modelling was limited to only 25 years with an initial Probable Ore Reserves declared of 538Mt, only representing 30% of the total Mineral Resource Estimate.
Managing Director, Frank Eagar commented: “These drilling results re-confirm the significant scale of the Kasiya deposit with the strike now stretching over 37km long. Sovereign continues to test the extent of regional mineralisation via low-cost hand-auger drilling, which has the potential to increase the already very large Kasiya Resource.”
Classification 2.2: This announcement includes Inside Information
ENQUIRIES
Frank Eagar (South Africa/Malawi) +61(8) 9322 6322 |
Sam Cordin (Perth) |
Sapan Ghai (London)
|
||
Nominated Adviser on AIM and Joint Broker |
|
|
||
SP Angel Corporate Finance LLP |
+44 20 3470 0470 |
|
||
Ewan Leggat Charlie Bouverat Harry Davies-Ball |
|
|||
|
|
|
||
Joint Brokers |
|
|
||
Berenberg |
+44 20 3207 7800 |
|
||
Matthew Armitt |
|
|
||
Jennifer Lee |
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
Buchanan |
+ +44 20 7466 5000 |
|
||
REGIONAL DRILLING PROGRAM
Regional hand-auger drilling south of the Kasiya MRE footprint has identified significant strike extensions of approximately 8km across a number of parallel mineralised zones ranging from 400m to 2km in width.
All newly defined mineralisation remains open at depth, due to the limitations of the hand-auger drilling method but are expected to continue to the saprock boundary normally between 20 and 30m vertical metres from surface. The multiple mineralised zones identified remain open along strike both to the north and south.
Figure 1: Southern newly defined mineralised extensions at Kasiya
Highlight drill results include;
· 14m @ 1.03% incl. 2m @ 1.35% rutile from surface
· 17m @ 1.01% incl. 2m @ 1.42% rutile from surface
· 9m @ 0.93% incl. 2m @1.58% rutile from surface
· 12m @ 1.31% incl. 3m @ 1.97% rutile from surface
· 13m @ 1.02% incl. 3m @ 1.16% rutile from surface
· 12m @ 1.02% rutile & 4.5% graphite incl. 2m @ 1.41% rutile from surface
Competent Person Statement
The information in this report that relates to Exploration Results is based on information compiled by Mr Samuel Moyle, a Competent Person who is a member of The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (AusIMM). Mr Moyle is the Exploration Manager of Sovereign Metals Limited and a holder of ordinary shares and unlisted performance rights in Sovereign Metals Limited. Mr Moyle has sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity being undertaken, to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’ and as a Qualified Person under the AIM Rules. Mr Moyle consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.
The information in this announcement that relates to the Mineral Resource Estimate is extracted from an announcement dated 5 April 2023 entitled ‘Kasiya Indicated Resource Increased by over 80%’ which is available to view at www.sovereignmetals.com.au and is based on, and fairly represents information compiled by Mr Richard Stockwell, a Competent Person, who is a fellow of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (AIG). Mr Stockwell is a principal of Placer Consulting Pty Ltd, an independent consulting company. The original announcement is available to view on www.sovereignmetals.com.au. Sovereign confirms that a) it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in the original announcement; b) all material assumptions included in the original announcement continue to apply and have not materially changed; and c) the form and context in which the relevant Competent Persons’ findings are presented in this announcement have not been materially changed from the original announcement.
The information in this announcement that relates to Production Targets, Ore Reserves, Processing, Infrastructure and Capital Operating Costs, Metallurgy (rutile and graphite) is extracted from an announcement dated 28 September 2023 entitled ‘Kasiya Pre-Feasibility Study Results’ which is available to view at www.sovereignmetals.com.au. Sovereign confirms that: a) it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in the original announcement; b) all material assumptions and technical parameters underpinning the Production Target, and related forecast financial information derived from the Production Target included in the original announcement continue to apply and have not materially changed; and c) the form and context in which the relevant Competent Persons’ findings are presented in this presentation have not been materially modified from the Announcement.
Ore Reserve for the Kasiya Deposit |
|
||||||
Classification |
Tonnes |
Rutile Grade |
Contained Rutile |
Graphite Grade (TGC) (%) |
Contained Graphite |
RutEq. Grade* |
|
Proved |
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
|
Probable |
538 |
1.03% |
5.5 |
1.66% |
8.9 |
2.00% |
|
Total |
538 |
1.03% |
5.5 |
1.66% |
8.9 |
2.00% |
|
* RutEq. Formula: Rutile Grade x Recovery (100%) x Rutile Price (US$1,484/t) + Graphite Grade x Recovery (67.5%) x Graphite Price (US$1,290/t) / Rutile Price (US$1,484/t). All assumptions are taken from this Study ** Any minor summation inconsistencies are due to rounding
Kasiya Total Indicated + Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate at 0.7% rutile cut-off grade |
|||||
Classification |
Resource |
Rutile Grade |
Contained Rutile |
Graphite Grade (TGC) (%) |
Contained Graphite |
Indicated |
1,200 |
1.0% |
12.2 |
1.5% |
18.0 |
Inferred |
609 |
0.9% |
5.7 |
1.1% |
6.5 |
Total |
1,809 |
1.0% |
17.9 |
1.4% |
24.4 |
The information contained within this announcement is deemed by the Company to constitute inside information as stipulated under the Market Abuse Regulations (EU) No. 596/2014 as it forms part of UK domestic law by virtue of the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 (‘MAR’). Upon the publication of this announcement via Regulatory Information Service (‘RIS’), this inside information is now considered to be in the public domain.
Forward Looking Statement
This release may include forward-looking statements, which may be identified by words such as “expects”, “anticipates”, “believes”, “projects”, “plans”, and similar expressions. These forward-looking statements are based on Sovereign’s expectations and beliefs concerning future events. Forward looking statements are necessarily subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are outside the control of Sovereign, which could cause actual results to differ materially from such statements. There can be no assurance that forward-looking statements will prove to be correct. Sovereign makes no undertaking to subsequently update or revise the forward-looking statements made in this release, to reflect the circumstances or events after the date of that release.
This announcement has been approved and authorised for release by the Company’s Managing Director & CEO, Frank Eagar.
Appendix I – DRILL RESULTS – Table 2
Rutile and graphite drilling results from Kasiya are shown below in Table 2.
Hole ID |
Interval Thickness |
Rutile % |
TGC % |
From (m) Downhole |
Hole Type |
KYHA1273 |
8.0 |
1.52 |
0.7 |
9.0 |
HA |
incl |
5.0 |
2.08 |
0.3 |
12.0 |
|
KYHA1274 |
9.0 |
0.93 |
2.0 |
0.0 |
HA |
incl |
2.0 |
1.58 |
0.5 |
0.0 |
|
KYHA1275 |
3.0 |
0.96 |
1.0 |
0.0 |
HA |
KYHA1276 |
6.0 |
0.83 |
0.9 |
0.0 |
HA |
incl |
2.0 |
1.25 |
0.3 |
0.0 |
|
KYHA1277 |
10.0 |
0.74 |
2.0 |
0.0 |
HA |
incl |
2.0 |
1.32 |
0.3 |
0.0 |
|
KYHA1278 |
2.0 |
0.95 |
0.3 |
0.0 |
HA |
KYHA1279 |
7.0 |
0.78 |
0.8 |
0.0 |
HA |
incl |
3.0 |
1.02 |
0.3 |
0.0 |
|
KYHA1280 |
12.0 |
0.85 |
0.8 |
0.0 |
HA |
incl |
3.0 |
1.27 |
0.2 |
0.0 |
|
KYHA1281 |
3.0 |
0.78 |
0.2 |
0.0 |
HA |
KYHA1282 |
14.0 |
1.03 |
1.6 |
0.0 |
HA |
incl |
2.0 |
1.35 |
0.3 |
0.0 |
|
KYHA1283 |
5.0 |
0.80 |
0.3 |
0.0 |
HA |
incl |
2.0 |
1.26 |
0.3 |
0.0 |
|
KYHA1284 |
2.5 |
0.65 |
4.8 |
7.0 |
HA |
incl |
2.0 |
1.09 |
0.8 |
0.0 |
|
KYHA1285 |
2.0 |
1.03 |
0.3 |
0.0 |
HA |
KYHA1286 |
7.0 |
0.73 |
0.3 |
0.0 |
HA |
incl |
2.0 |
1.21 |
0.4 |
0.0 |
|
KYHA1287 |
10.0 |
0.91 |
3.2 |
0.0 |
HA |
incl |
2.0 |
1.54 |
0.5 |
0.0 |
|
KYHA1288 |
2.0 |
1.30 |
0.4 |
0.0 |
HA |
KYHA1289 |
2.0 |
0.67 |
0.2 |
0.0 |
HA |
KYHA1290 |
3.0 |
0.59 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
HA |
KYHA1291 |
2.0 |
0.70 |
0.2 |
0.0 |
HA |
KYHA1292 |
5.0 |
0.91 |
0.4 |
0.0 |
HA |
incl |
2.0 |
1.28 |
0.3 |
0.0 |
|
KYHA1293 |
11.0 |
0.71 |
3.3 |
0.0 |
HA |
incl |
2.0 |
1.18 |
0.3 |
0.0 |
|
KYHA1294 |
7.0 |
0.74 |
0.4 |
0.0 |
HA |
incl |
3.0 |
1.01 |
0.4 |
0.0 |
|
KYHA1295 |
3.0 |
0.71 |
0.1 |
0.0 |
HA |
KYHA1296 |
13.0 |
0.76 |
2.7 |
0.0 |
HA |
KYHA1297 |
NSR |
HA |
|||
KYHA1298 |
4.0 |
0.84 |
0.2 |
0.0 |
HA |
incl |
2.0 |
1.11 |
0.2 |
0.0 |
|
KYHA1299 |
4.0 |
0.85 |
0.4 |
0.0 |
HA |
incl |
2.0 |
1.15 |
0.4 |
0.0 |
|
KYHA1300 |
14.0 |
0.78 |
4.2 |
0.0 |
HA |
incl |
2.0 |
1.00 |
0.4 |
0.0 |
|
KYHA1301 |
6.0 |
0.74 |
0.3 |
0.0 |
HA |
KYHA1302 |
4.0 |
0.99 |
0.2 |
0.0 |
HA |
incl |
2.0 |
1.30 |
0.1 |
0.0 |
|
KYHA1303 |
13.0 |
1.02 |
2.4 |
0.0 |
HA |
incl |
3.0 |
1.16 |
0.3 |
0.0 |
|
incl |
2.0 |
1.22 |
4.1 |
8.0 |
|
KYHA1304 |
4.0 |
0.84 |
0.3 |
0.0 |
HA |
incl |
2.0 |
1.13 |
0.3 |
0.0 |
|
KYHA1305 |
17.0 |
1.01 |
1.3 |
0.0 |
HA |
incl |
2.0 |
1.42 |
0.3 |
0.0 |
|
incl |
4.0 |
1.43 |
3.2 |
13.0 |
|
KYHA1306 |
6.0 |
0.79 |
0.3 |
0.0 |
HA |
incl |
3.0 |
1.08 |
0.3 |
0.0 |
|
KYHA1307 |
11.0 |
0.77 |
2.7 |
0.0 |
HA |
incl |
2.0 |
1.31 |
0.4 |
0.0 |
|
KYHA1308 |
12.0 |
0.81 |
0.9 |
0.0 |
HA |
incl |
3.0 |
1.27 |
0.2 |
0.0 |
|
KYHA1309 |
2.0 |
0.56 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
HA |
KYHA1310 |
8.0 |
0.86 |
2.0 |
0.0 |
HA |
incl |
2.0 |
1.35 |
0.3 |
0.0 |
|
KYHA1311 |
3.0 |
1.07 |
0.3 |
0.0 |
HA |
incl |
3.0 |
1.07 |
0.3 |
0.0 |
|
KYHA1312 |
NSR |
HA |
|||
KYHA1313 |
6.0 |
0.77 |
0.5 |
0.0 |
HA |
incl |
2.0 |
1.19 |
0.2 |
0.0 |
|
KYHA1314 |
12.0 |
1.02 |
4.5 |
0.0 |
HA |
incl |
2.0 |
1.41 |
0.5 |
0.0 |
|
incl |
3.0 |
1.05 |
6.9 |
6.0 |
|
KYHA1315 |
12.0 |
1.31 |
1.6 |
0.0 |
HA |
incl |
3.0 |
1.97 |
0.4 |
0.0 |
|
incl |
6.0 |
1.14 |
2.3 |
6.0 |
|
KYHA1316 |
6.0 |
1.16 |
1.5 |
0.0 |
HA |
incl |
2.0 |
1.49 |
0.3 |
0.0 |
|
incl |
2.0 |
1.12 |
3.6 |
4.0 |
|
KYHA1317 |
10.0 |
0.75 |
3.2 |
0.0 |
HA |
incl |
2.0 |
1.02 |
0.5 |
0.0 |
|
KYHA1318 |
10.0 |
0.90 |
0.9 |
0.0 |
HA |
incl |
2.0 |
1.75 |
0.2 |
0.0 |
|
KYHA1319 |
NSR |
HA |
|||
KYHA1320 |
6.0 |
0.94 |
4.2 |
3.0 |
HA |
incl |
3.0 |
1.15 |
5.6 |
6.0 |
|
KYHA1321 |
2.0 |
0.68 |
0.1 |
0.0 |
HA |
KYHA1322 |
15.0 |
0.66 |
2.0 |
0.0 |
HA |
KYHA1323 |
2.0 |
0.66 |
0.6 |
3.0 |
HA |
KYHA1324 |
6.0 |
0.92 |
1.1 |
0.0 |
HA |
incl |
2.0 |
1.35 |
0.6 |
0.0 |
|
KYHA1324 |
4.0 |
0.76 |
3.7 |
8.0 |
HA |
KYHA1325 |
5.0 |
0.81 |
0.4 |
0.0 |
HA |
incl |
5.0 |
1.32 |
0.4 |
12.0 |
APPENDIX II: DRILL HOLE COLLAR DATA – TABLE 3
Hole ID |
Easting |
Northing |
RL |
Depth |
|
Hole ID |
Easting |
Northing |
RL |
Depth |
KYHA1273 |
548398 |
8452800 |
1209 |
17.0 |
KYHA1300 |
549400 |
8457202 |
1207 |
14.0 |
|
KYHA1274 |
548397 |
8452407 |
1205 |
9.0 |
KYHA1301 |
541997 |
8463199 |
1151 |
10.0 |
|
KYHA1275 |
548798 |
8452405 |
1207 |
12.0 |
KYHA1302 |
542401 |
8463198 |
1158 |
11.0 |
|
KYHA1276 |
548796 |
8453205 |
1209 |
13.0 |
KYHA1303 |
542819 |
8463208 |
1159 |
13.0 |
|
KYHA1277 |
548799 |
8452800 |
1208 |
10.0 |
KYHA1304 |
548999 |
8457201 |
1210 |
19.0 |
|
KYHA1278 |
548399 |
8453201 |
1209 |
13.0 |
KYHA1305 |
548598 |
8457197 |
1207 |
17.0 |
|
KYHA1279 |
541598 |
8465602 |
1156 |
12.0 |
KYHA1306 |
548198 |
8457199 |
1198 |
6.0 |
|
KYHA1280 |
542001 |
8465598 |
1151 |
12.0 |
KYHA1307 |
542000 |
8462801 |
1151 |
11.0 |
|
KYHA1281 |
542402 |
8465601 |
1146 |
12.0 |
KYHA1308 |
542401 |
8462800 |
1158 |
12.0 |
|
KYHA1282 |
548800 |
8454400 |
1215 |
15.0 |
KYHA1309 |
542806 |
8462792 |
1158 |
10.0 |
|
KYHA1283 |
549201 |
8454401 |
1225 |
11.0 |
KYHA1310 |
542003 |
8462400 |
1149 |
8.0 |
|
KYHA1284 |
549603 |
8454397 |
1218 |
9.5 |
KYHA1311 |
542402 |
8462400 |
1153 |
8.0 |
|
KYHA1285 |
550004 |
8454400 |
1205 |
12.0 |
KYHA1312 |
542800 |
8462401 |
1154 |
7.0 |
|
KYHA1286 |
550000 |
8454801 |
1209 |
15.0 |
KYHA1313 |
546399 |
8463199 |
1182 |
14.0 |
|
KYHA1287 |
549597 |
8454801 |
1219 |
10.0 |
KYHA1314 |
546000 |
8462801 |
1183 |
12.0 |
|
KYHA1288 |
549198 |
8454801 |
1219 |
17.0 |
KYHA1315 |
546398 |
8462803 |
1184 |
12.0 |
|
KYHA1289 |
548799 |
8454801 |
1211 |
13.0 |
KYHA1316 |
546002 |
8463201 |
1183 |
13.0 |
|
KYHA1290 |
548800 |
8455196 |
1208 |
13.0 |
KYHA1317 |
545999 |
8462402 |
1182 |
10.0 |
|
KYHA1291 |
549199 |
8455199 |
1212 |
16.0 |
KYHA1318 |
546399 |
8462403 |
1185 |
10.0 |
|
KYHA1292 |
549601 |
8455199 |
1214 |
16.0 |
KYHA1319 |
543198 |
8462401 |
1156 |
10.0 |
|
KYHA1293 |
550005 |
8455196 |
1208 |
15.0 |
KYHA1320 |
543198 |
8462803 |
1155 |
9.0 |
|
KYHA1294 |
548200 |
8456800 |
1204 |
14.0 |
KYHA1321 |
543201 |
8463199 |
1154 |
6.0 |
|
KYHA1295 |
548600 |
8456801 |
1213 |
12.0 |
KYHA1322 |
542800 |
8465593 |
1141 |
15.0 |
|
KYHA1296 |
549003 |
8456803 |
1217 |
13.0 |
KYHA1323 |
543198 |
8465598 |
1138 |
5.0 |
|
KYHA1297 |
549399 |
8456797 |
1209 |
14.0 |
KYHA1324 |
541193 |
8465601 |
1160 |
12.0 |
|
KYHA1298 |
549800 |
8456801 |
1200 |
12.0 |
KYHA1325 |
548398 |
8452801 |
1209 |
17.0 |
|
KYHA1299 |
549800 |
8457199 |
1199 |
11.0 |
Appendix III: JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1
SECTION 1 – SAMPLING TECHNIQUES AND DATA
Criteria |
JORC Code explanation |
Commentary |
Sampling Techniques |
Nature and quality of sampling (e.g. cut channels, random chips, or specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling.
|
A total of 53 hand-auger holes for 639m were drilled at the Kasiya Project to obtain samples for quantitative mineralogical determination.
Hand-Auger samples are composited based on regolith boundaries and sample chemistry, generated by hand-held XRF analysis. Each 1m of sample is dried and riffle-split to generate a total sample weight of 3kg for analysis, generally at 1m-4m intervals. This primary sample is then split again to provide a 1.5kg sample for both rutile and graphite analyses.
|
Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used.
|
Drilling and sampling activities are supervised by a suitably qualified Company geologist who is present at all times. All drill samples are geologically logged by the geologist at the drill site/core yard.
Each sample is sun dried and homogenised. Sub-samples are carefully riffle split to ensure representivity. The 1.5kg composite samples are then processed.
An equivalent mass is taken from each sample to make up the composite. A calibration schedule is in place for laboratory scales, sieves and field XRF equipment.
Placer Consulting Pty Ltd (Placer) Resource Geologists have reviewed Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) for the collection and processing of drill samples and found them to be fit for purpose. The primary composite sample is considered representative for this style of rutile mineralisation.
|
|
Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public Report. In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has been done this would be relatively simple (e.g. ‘reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay’). In other cases more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (e.g. submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information.
|
Logged mineralogy percentages and lithology information is used to determine compositing intervals. Care is taken to ensure that only samples with similar geological characteristics are composited together. |
|
Drilling Techniques |
Drill type (e.g. core, reverse circulation, open‐hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (e.g. core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face‐sampling bit or other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc).
|
A total of 53 hand-auger holes for 639m were drilled at the Kasiya Project to obtain samples for quantitative determination of recoverable rutile and Total Graphitic Carbon (TGC).
Hand-auger drilling with 75mm diameter enclosed spiral bits with 1-metre-long steel rods. Each 1m of drill sample is collected into separate sample bags and set aside. The auger bits and flights are cleaned between each metre of sampling to avoid contamination.
Placer has reviewed SOPs for hand-auger drilling and found them to be fit for purpose and support the resource classifications as applied to the MRE.
|
Drill Sample Recovery |
Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries and results assessed.
|
Samples are assessed visually for recoveries. The configuration of drilling and nature of materials encountered results in negligible sample loss or contamination. Samples are assessed visually for recoveries. Overall, recovery is good. Drilling is ceased when recoveries become poor once the water table has been reached. Auger drilling samples are actively assessed by the geologist onsite for recoveries and contamination. |
Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure representative nature of the samples.
|
The Company’s trained geologists supervise drilling on a 1 team 1 geologist basis and are responsible for monitoring all aspects of the drilling and sampling process. Hand-auger drilling samples are retrieved and placed into large plastic bags. The bags are clearly labelled and delivered back to the laydown at the end of shift for processing.
|
|
Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material.
|
No relationship is believed to exist between grade and sample recovery. The high percentage of silt and absence of hydraulic inflow from groundwater at this deposit results in a sample size that is well within the expected size range.
No bias related to preferential loss or gain of different materials is observed.
|
|
Logging |
Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation mining studies and metallurgical studies.
|
Geologically, data is collected in detail, sufficient to aid in Mineral Resource estimation.
All individual 1-metre intervals are geologically logged, recording relevant data to a set log-chief template using company codes. A small representative sample is collected for each 1-metre interval and placed in appropriately labelled chip trays for future reference.
|
Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc.) photography.
|
All logging includes lithological features and estimates of basic mineralogy. Logging is generally qualitative.
|
|
The total length and percentage of the relevant intersection logged
|
100% of samples are geologically logged. |
|
Sub-sampling techniques and sample preparation |
If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core taken.
|
N/A
|
If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc. and whether sampled wet or dry. |
Hand-auger samples from the 53 holes drilled are dried, riffle split and composited. Samples are collected and homogenised prior to splitting to ensure sample representivity. ~1.5kg composite samples are processed.
An equivalent mass is taken from each primary sample to make up the composite.
The primary composite sample is considered representative for this style of mineralisation and is consistent with industry standard practice.
|
|
For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample preparation technique.
|
Techniques for sample preparation are detailed on SOP documents verified by Placer Resource Geologists.
Sample preparation is recorded on a standard flow sheet and detailed QA/QC is undertaken on all samples. Sample preparation techniques and QA/QC protocols are appropriate for mineral determination.
|
|
Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages to maximise representivity of samples.
|
The sampling equipment is cleaned after each sub-sample is taken.
Field duplicate, laboratory replicate and standard sample geostatistical analysis is employed to manage sample precision and analysis accuracy.
|
|
Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in situ material collected, including for instance results for field duplicate/second-half sampling.
|
Sample size analysis is completed to verify sampling accuracy. Field duplicates are collected for precision analysis of riffle splitting. SOPs consider sample representivity. Results indicate a sufficient level of precision for the resource classification.
|
|
Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being sampled.
|
The sample size is considered appropriate for the material sampled. |
|
Quality of assay data and laboratory tests |
The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or total. |
Rutile The Malawi onsite laboratory sample preparation methods are considered quantitative to the point where a non-magnetic mineral concentrate (NM) is generated.
Final results generated are for recovered rutile i.e. the % mass of the sample that is rutile that can be recovered to the non-magnetic component of a HMC.
The HMC is prepared via wet-table, gravity separation at the Lilongwe Laboratory which provides an ideal sample for subsequent magnetic separation and XRF.
All samples (incl. QA) included in this announcement received the following workflow undertaken on-site in Malawi; · Dry sample in oven for 1 hour at 105℃ · Soak in water and lightly agitate · Wet screen at 5mm, 600µm and 45µm to remove oversize and slimes material · Dry +45µm -600mm (sand fraction) in oven for 1 hour at 105℃ · Pass +45µm -600mm (sand fraction) across wet table to generate a heavy mineral concentrate (HMC) · Pan HMC to remove retained light minerals · Dry HMC in oven for 30 minutes at 105℃ · Magnetic separation of the HMC by Carpco magnet @ 16,800G (2.9Amps) into a magnetic (M) and non-magnetic (NM) fraction.
Bag NM fraction and send to Perth, Australia for quantitative chemical and mineralogical determination. · The NM fractions were sent to ALS Metallurgy Perth for quantitative XRF analysis. Samples received XRF_MS.
Graphite All samples are initially checked in and processed to pulp at Intertek-Genalysis Johannesburg. The pulp samples are then dispatched to Intertek-Genalysis Perth where they undergo TGC assay via method C72/CSA. A portion of each test sample is dissolved in dilute hydrochloric acid to liberate carbonate carbon. The solution is filtered using a filter paper and the collected residue is the dried to 425°C in a muffle oven to drive off organic carbon. The dried sample is then combusted in a Carbon/ Sulphur analyser to yield total graphitic or elemental carbon (TGC). The graphitic carbon content is determined by eliminating other carbon forms from the total carbon content. The addition of acid to the sample liberates carbon dioxide thus removing carbonate carbon. Soluble organic carbon will also be removed. Insoluble organic carbon is removed by heating the samples at 425°C in an oxidising environment. The “dried” carbon-bearing sample that is analysed in the resistance furnace is considered to contain only graphitic carbon. An Eltra CS-800 induction furnace infra-red CS analyser is then used to determine the remaining carbon which is reported as Total Graphitic Carbon (TGC) as a percentage.
|
For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc., the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc.
|
Acceptable levels of accuracy and precision have been established. No handheld XRF methods are used for quantitative determination. |
|
Nature of quality control procedures adopted (e.g. standards, blanks, duplicate, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (i.e. lack of bias) and precision have been established.
|
Sovereign uses internal and externally sourced wet screening reference material inserted into samples batches at a rate of 1 in 20. The externally sourced, certified standard reference material for HM and Slimes assessment is provided by Placer Consulting.
Accuracy monitoring is achieved through submission of certified reference materials (CRM’s). ALS and Intertek both use internal CRMs and duplicates on XRF analyses. Sovereign also inserts CRMs into the sample batches at a rate of 1 in 20.
Analysis of sample duplicates is undertaken by standard geostatistical methodologies (Scatter, Pair Difference and QQ Plots) to test for bias and to ensure that sample splitting is representative. Standards determine assay accuracy performance, monitored on control charts, where failure (beyond 3SD from the mean) may trigger re-assay of the affected batch.
Examination of the QA/QC sample data indicates satisfactory performance of field sampling protocols and assay laboratories providing acceptable levels of precision and accuracy.
Acceptable levels of accuracy and precision are displayed in geostatistical analyses.
|
|
Verification of sampling & assaying |
The verification of significant intersections by either independent or alternative company personnel.
|
Results are reviewed in cross-section using Micromine software and any spurious results are investigated. The deposit type and consistency of mineralisation leaves little room for unexplained variance. Extreme high grades are not encountered.
|
The use of twinned holes. |
Twinned holes are not reported here.
|
|
Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols. |
All geological field logging data is collected in LogChief logging software. This data is then imported to Datashed5 and validated automatically and then manually.
Sovereigns’ laboratory data is captured onto paper templates or excel and transferred manually to the database.
|
|
Discuss any adjustment to assay data.
|
QEMSCAN of the NM fraction shows dominantly clean and liberated rutile grains and confirms rutile is the only titanium species in the NM fraction.
Recovered rutile is therefore defined and reported here as: TiO2 recovered in the +45 to -600um range to the NM concentrate fraction as a % of the total primary, dry, raw sample mass divided by 95% (to represent an approximation of final product specifications). i.e. recoverable rutile within the whole sample.
|
|
Location of data points |
Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource estimation.
|
A Trimble R2 Differential GPS is used to pick up the collars. Daily capture at a registered reference marker ensures equipment remains in calibration. No downhole surveying is completed. Given the vertical nature and shallow depths of the holes, drill hole deviation is not considered to significantly affect the downhole location of samples.
|
Specification of the grid system used. |
WGS84 UTM Zone 36 South.
|
|
Quality and adequacy of topographic control. |
DGPS pickups are considered to be high quality topographic control measures.
|
|
Data spacing & distribution |
Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results. |
The hand-auger holes are spaced on a on a regular grid which is deemed to adequately define the mineralisation under investigation.
|
Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied. |
The drill spacing and distribution is considered to be sufficient to establish a degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for further future Mineral Resource estimation.
|
|
Whether sample compositing has been applied. |
Individual 1m intervals have been composited, based on lithology for the 53 hand-auger holes.
|
|
Orientation of data in relation to geological structure |
Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of possible structures and the extent to which this is known considering the deposit type
|
Sample orientation is vertical and approximately perpendicular to the orientation of the mineralisation, which results in true thickness estimates, limited by the sampling interval as applied. Drilling and sampling are carried out on a regular square grid. There is no apparent bias arising from the orientation of the drill holes with respect to the orientation of the deposit.
|
If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material.
|
There is no apparent bias arising from the orientation of the drill holes with respect to the orientation of the deposit. |
|
Sample security |
The measures taken to ensure sample security |
Samples are stored in secure storage from the time of drilling, through gathering, compositing and analysis. The samples are sealed as soon as site preparation is complete.
A reputable international transport company with shipment tracking enables a chain of custody to be maintained while the samples move from Malawi to Australia or Malawi to Johannesburg. Samples are again securely stored once they arrive and are processed at Australian laboratories. A reputable domestic courier company manages the movement of samples within Perth, Australia.
At each point of the sample workflow the samples are inspected by a company representative to monitor sample condition. Each laboratory confirms the integrity of the samples upon receipt.
|
Audits or reviews |
The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data
|
Richard Stockwell (resource CP) has reviewed and advised on all stages of data collection, sample processing, QA protocol and mineral resource estimation. Methods employed are considered industry best-practice.
Malawi Field and Laboratory visits have been completed by Richard Stockwell in May 2022. A high standard of operation, procedure and personnel was observed and reported.
|
SECTION 2 – REPORTING OF EXPLORATION RESULTS
Criteria |
Explanation |
Commentary |
Mineral tenement & land tenure status |
Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites, wilderness or national park and environment settings. |
The Company owns 100% of the following Exploration Licences (ELs) and Retention Licence (RL) under the Mines and Minerals Act (No 8. of 2019), held in the Company’s wholly-owned, Malawi-registered subsidiaries: EL0609, EL0582, EL0492, EL0528, EL0545, EL0561, and EL0657. A 5% royalty is payable to the government upon mining and a 2% of net profit royalty is payable to the original project vendor. No significant native vegetation or reserves exist in the area. The region is intensively cultivated for agricultural crops. |
The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area. |
The tenements are in good standing and no known impediments to exploration or mining exist. |
|
Exploration done by other parties
|
Acknowledgement and appraisal of exploration by other parties. |
Sovereign Metals Ltd is a first-mover in the discovery and definition of residual rutile and graphite resources in Malawi. No other parties are involved in exploration. |
Geology |
Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation |
The rutile deposit type is considered a residual placer formed by the intense weathering of rutile-rich basement paragneisses and variable enrichment by eluvial processes. Rutile occurs in a mostly topographically flat area west of Malawi’s capital, known as the Lilongwe Plain, where a deep tropical weathering profile is preserved. A typical profile from top to base is generally soil (“SOIL” 0-1m) ferruginous pedolith (“FERP”, 1-4m), mottled zone (“MOTT”, 4-7m), pallid saprolite (“PSAP”, 7-9m), saprolite (“SAPL”, 9-25m), saprock (“SAPR”, 25-35m) and fresh rock (“FRESH” >35m). The low-grade graphite mineralisation occurs as multiple bands of graphite gneisses, hosted within a broader Proterozoic paragneiss package. In the Kasiya areas specifically, the preserved weathering profile hosts significant vertical thicknesses from near surface of graphite mineralisation. |
Drill hole information |
A summary of all information material to the understanding of the exploration results including a tabulation of the following information for all Material drill holes: easting and northings of the drill hole collar; elevation or RL (Reduced Level-elevation above sea level in metres of the drill hole collar); dip and azimuth of the hole; down hole length and interception depth; and hole length |
All collar and composite data are provided in the body and appendices of this report.
|
If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that the information is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from the understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly explain why this is the case |
No information has been excluded. |
|
Data aggregation methods |
In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques, maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (e.g. cutting of high-grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material and should be stated. |
All results reported are of a length-weighted average of in-situ grades. The results reported in the body of the report are on a nominal lower cut-off of 0.5% Rutile and exclude bottom of hole samples where saprock has been geologically logged.
|
Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high-grade results and longer lengths of low-grade results, the procedure used for such aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of such aggregations should be shown in detail. |
No data aggregation was required. |
|
The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values should be clearly stated. |
No metal equivalent values are used in this report. |
|
Relationship between mineralisation widths & intercept lengths |
These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of Exploration Results. |
The mineralisation has been released by weathering of the underlying, layered gneissic bedrock that broadly trends NE-SW. It lies in a laterally extensive superficial blanket with high-grade zones reflecting the broad bedrock strike orientation of ~045°. |
If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is known, its nature should be reported. |
The mineralisation is laterally extensive where the entire weathering profile is preserved and not significantly eroded. Minor removal of the mineralised profile has occurred in alluvial channels. These areas are adequately defined by the drilling pattern and topographical control. |
|
If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there should be a clear statement to this effect (e.g. ‘down hole length, true width not known’. |
Downhole widths approximate true widths limited to the sample intervals applied. Graphite results are approximate true width as defined by the sample interval and typically increase with depth. |
|
Diagrams |
Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of intercepts should be included for any significant discovery being reported. These should include, but not be limited to a plan view of the drill collar locations and appropriate sectional views. |
Refer to figures in the body of this report. |
Balanced reporting |
Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not practicable, representative reporting of both low and high-grades and/or widths should be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of exploration results. |
All results are included in this report. |
Other substantive exploration data |
Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be reported including (but not limited to: geological observations; geophysical survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples – size and method of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock characteristics; potential deleterious or contaminating substances. |
Rutile has been determined, by QEMSCAN, to be the major TiO2-bearing mineral at and around several rutile prospects within Sovereign’s ground package. The Company continues to examine areas within the large tenement package for rutile and graphite by-product mineralisation. |
Further work |
The nature and scale of planned further work (e.g. test for lateral extensions or depth extensions or large-scale step-out drilling). |
No further exploration is planned at this stage. |
Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions, including the main geological interpretations and future drilling areas, provided this information is not commercially sensitive. |
Refer to diagrams in the body of this report. |
#FCM First Class Metals PLC – Half-year Report
29th September 2023 / Leave a comment
In early May FCM announced that field work had been initiated on its projects in Canada, with three exploration teams deployed:
· Channel Sampling of the Rare Earth Element (REE) Diatreme at McKellar underway.
· Sunbeam historic review widened to encompass detailed core review from historical drill holes. Grades up to 93.3g/t Gold (Au).
· Field base set up and exploration soon to commence on the North Hemlo and Esa properties to follow up on the successes of 2022.
A property wise summary of the exploration work conducted in the first six months of 2023 is enumerated as follows:
North Hemlo
· The Dead Otter Lake area is situated 20.5km North of the iconic Barrick Hemlo 23m oz producing gold mine.
· The main event of significance is the Identification of a +3km long gold (‘Au’) and molybdenum (‘Mo’) anomalous trend – named the Dead Otter Lake trend (‘DOT’), which is situated to the southeast of the historic Dead Otter Lake occurrence. Grab samples recorded up to 19.6g/t Au along the trend. Sampling has extended anomalous Au/Mo mineralisation for +3km to the SE from the historic showing (3.7 g/t Au, 0.59% Mo). The mineralised structure closely mimics the granite contact. The 19.6 g/t Au sample, in the extreme SE of the trend could be where one of potentially two subparallel arcuate structures intersects the trend.
· The Exploration currently in progress at North Hemlo is with a clear focus on drill preparation. Visible gold has been observed in multiple grab samples from the Dead Otter Trend.
· Exploration permit has been submitted to the Provincial authorities, reflecting our confidence in our exploration progress and our commitment to fulfilling all necessary regulatory requirements.
In May, FCM signed an exclusivity agreement for an Option cum Earn-In arrangement with Ongold a private company in respect to its claims contiguous to North Hemlo.
Zigzag
· The signing of the Earn-in Agreement with Nuinsco Resources Limited (“Nuinsco”) completes the process outlined in the ‘Exclusivity Agreement’ announced on the 12th of December 2022 for the Zigzag hard rock lithium property in NW Ontario.
· The project funding was also announced in the same news release, James Goozee a High Net Worth Individual (“HNWI”) who is a battery metals focussed investor took the full £300,000 private subscription at 16p per share.
· Historic grades reported at surface were up to 1.68% lithium (Li20) over 7.9m and 0.168% tantalum (Ta205) over 2.54m. The claim group covers the historic Tebishogeshik occurrence as well as other mineralised occurrences.
· The pegmatite hosting the deposit is reported to be more than 800m in length and 20m thick at surface.
· Sampling by Nuinsco returned strongly anomalous lithium, tantalum, and rubidium, peaking at 3.55% Li20 with significant tantalum and rubidium results at 836 ppm Ta₂O5, and 4,003 ppm Rubidium Rb₂2O.
· Exploration Permit already in place, allowing for exploration activities which may include stripping, trenching, and drilling.
· The property is located 10.5km from the Green Technology Metals Limited (ASX: GT1) Seymour Project and several other hard rock lithium properties. It is also close to nearby current and future planned key infrastructure.
· Zigzag Lithium-Initial reconnaissance trip with the property completely under the cover of snow returns grades of Lithium (Li) up to 1.00% and Tantalum (Ta) up to 198 ppm.
Sunbeam
· The historic data and core reviews have been completed.
· Extensive prospecting, sampling, and mapping programs were conducted, this includes rediscovery of a 3m wide quartz vein on the Pettigrew Trend with over 200 samples collected.
· Project being prepared for stripping / channel sampling in order to identify preferred drill locations.
West Pickle Lake (‘WPL’)
· First Class Metals is delighted to report assay results from the West Pickle Lake massive sulphide discovery.
· These drill results reinforce both the high-grade nature of the West Pickle Lake Zone and the potential for tonnage as reported in hole TK22-114, the widths and grades are similar to the Palladium One RJ Zone approx. 2.5km to the East and further develops the theory of the chonolith / feeder dykes in the area to host significant mineralisation.
Selected highlights reported by Palladium One from the West Pickle Zone:
o TK-22-072 2.0% Ni, 0.9% Cu, 0.04% Co, 0.36 g/t Total Precious Metals (“TPM”) (Pt+Pd+Au) over 4.1 meters of massive and semi-massive sulphides in hole
o Including 5.3 Ni%, 1.5% Cu, 0.12% Co, 0.67 g/t TPM over 1.5 meters
o ThesTK-22-073 7.2% Ni, 2.0% Cu, 0.10% Co, 0.56 g/t Total Precious Metals (“TPM”) (Platinum (Pt) + Palladium (Pd) + Gold (Au)) over 2.6 meters of massive sulphides in hole.
o Including 10.3% Ni, 2.9% Cu, 0.15% Co, 0.80 g/t TPM over 1.8 meters
o TK-22-074 3.9% Nickel (Ni), 2.5% Copper (Cu), 0.05% Co, 0.55 g/t Total Precious Metals (“TPM”) (Pt+Pd+Au) over 2.0 meters of massive and semi-massive sulphides in hole
o Including 8.1% Ni, 2.8% Cu, 0.11% Co, 1.05 g/t TPM over 0.9 meters
o TK22-114 0.6% Ni, 0.4% Cu, 0.01% Co, 0.08 g/t Total Precious Metals (“TPM”) (Pt+Pd+Au) over 28.2 meters
o Including 2.0% Ni, 0.6% Cu, 0.04% Co, 0.12 g/t TPM over 3.2 meters
o TK22-118 0.43% Ni, 0.26% Cu, 0.01% Co, 0.06 g/t TPM over 27.0 meters.
o Including 2.0% Ni, 0.7% Cu, 0.04% Co, 0.14 g/t TPM over 1.0 meters
o TK22-116 1.5% Ni, 0.7% Cu, 0.02% Co, 0.30 g/t TPM over 8.0 meters.
o Including 10.0% Ni, 4.47% Cu, 0.14% Co, 2.13 g/t TPM over 1.0 meters
· Hole TK22-76 drilled just off the 100% owned FCM North Hemlo Property boundary by Palladium One intercepts 46.3m of anomalous nickel mineralisation in an east west trending structure, further proving up Palladium One’s property wide feeder dyke/chonolith geological model.
· West Pickle mineralised strike length increased to over 600 meters, remains open to the east and west.
· To date a total of 32 holes, totalling 6,766 meters have been drilled in the vicinity of the West Pickle Discovery.
Esa
· Total of 478 soil samples were collected from 11 predominantly subparallel, north – south soil lines in 2022.
· An intermittent 4km anomalous zone has been identified corresponding to the surface expression of the inferred shear.
· Multiple 10-95 ppb gold (Au) and key pathfinder elements including molybdenum (Mo), antimony (Sb) and arsenic (As).
· Anomalous trends identified by the soil sampling as well as the background magnetics highlighting NE structures intersecting the shear, including: Hemlo ‘look alike’ angular boulder identified, which reported 0.7ppm Au which is considered significant.
· Extensive soil sampling campaign completed to build on the successful 2022 program with 539 samples now awaiting assay results.
McKellar
“McKellar Trend” – Volcanic Massive Sulphide (“VMS”) conceptual trend supported by reconnaissance and assay results, extending over 550m, open ‘along strike’ in both directions.
· Over 100 grab samples taken with highlights including 4.82% Zinc (Zn) 80 g/t Silver (Ag)
· Work programme further proves up conceptual VMS model and extension of historical high grade metal occurrences across the property.
· Eight contiguous claims have been staked, adjoining the southern boundary of the McKellar property.
· McKellar has a proven potential for Rare Earth Elements (“REE”), confirmed by sawn channel sampling of diatreme verifies historical findings and further evidenced REE system.
Enable
· Field work identified a new gold (Au) with significant silver (Ag) ‘showing’ on the property.
· The historic West Perch Lake showing of ~2ppm Au confirmed and expanded.
· An exploration permit application is being drafted which will allow ‘mechanical exploration’ including drilling.
· The winter 2023 exploration campaign was completed with a programme of lake sediment sampling.
Sugar Cube
· In Q1 2023 a geophysics survey consisting of 578 line km comprising a helicopter borne low level 100m line spacing magnetic as well as electromagnetic (EM) survey was completed.
II. Operational Overview
North Hemlo & Esa
Figure showing the relative location of North Hemlo (including OnGold), Esa and Magical in respect to the Williams gold mine and the district scale shears associated with mineralisation
North Hemlo
Overview
The Flagship North Hemlo property historically comprised of three claim areas: Pezim I, Pezim II, and Wabikoba, which weren’t contiguous. However, the addition of the Hemlo North block, acquired from Power Metals Plc., brought North Hemlo together as one cohesive block.
The property now extends across 448 claims covering ~98km². Note: 33 claims are effectively under a Joint Venture agreement with Palladium One and FCM’s ownership is reduced to 20%.
There were limited historical showings on the property, the most important being the gold / molybdenum showing at Dead Otter Lake. The geology / geophysical signature of the Dotted Lake / Fairservice prospect continues onto the North Hemlo block. Furthermore, the JV – Earn-in with Palladium One has significantly enhanced the base, battery, and critical metal potential of the block.
Further potential is derived from the arcuate inferred shears which mimic the shear hosting the Hemlo gold mine.
In May, FCM signed exclusivity agreement for an Option cum Earn-In arrangement with Ongold a private company in respect to its 163 claims, covering 34 km² contiguous to the north of the North Hemlo property.
An Exploration permit, required for ‘invasive’ exploration such as trenching, stripping and drilling, has been drafted and after discussion with the First Nations submitted to the Ontario Provincial Mining authority for review.
Esa
Overview
The Esa property contains 86 claims, covers 20.6km², and is located approximately 11km northeast from the Barrick Hemlo gold mine, immediately south of FCM’s North Hemlo property.
The claim block is dissected by a geological / geophysical feature, which adds significant merit to the block’s potential. This structure is considered one of three subparallel, arcuate trends contained in the Hemlo ‘north limb’, which mirror the Hemlo trend to the south. Re-interpretation of geophysical data further enhanced the property’s prospectivity. Extensive exploration was conducted along this feature in 2022, and further soils sampling and prospecting conducted in 2023.
The assessment credits generated during the year will maintain the property in good standing through 2023.
An Exploration permit, required for ‘invasive’ exploration such as trenching, stripping, and drilling has been drafted and after discussion with the First Nations submitted to the Ontario Provincial Mining authority for review.
Work Conducted in 2023
A team was mobilised in early May to continue the exploration at Esa, focusing on the anomalous soil sample results as well as the 0.7ppm boulder identified in the central eastern sector as detailed in the recent news release.
A Further 534 soil samples and 5 rock chip samples have been collected, both subparallel to the shear – orthogonal to the north striking magnetic features- as well as in the areas of higher Au anomalism in the previous programme. Results have not yet been received.
Exploration at North Hemlo project started later in the month when the snow cover thawed. To advance the prospect towards drill ready status, the intention is to follow up the encouraging sampling on the Dead Otter Lake trend which has returned anomalous gold results along its 3km plus strike up to 19.6 g/t Au. Over the winter months ninety-six lake sediment samples as well as a number of rock samples were collected from North Hemlo, with very positive results being reported.
Discussions are ongoing with drill companies to undertake a maiden drilling programme at Esa and or North Hemlo. To this end the Application for an Exploration permit has been submitted to the Provincial authorities.
Sunbeam
Overview
The Sunbeam Gold Property includes the historic Sunbeam Mine. This was a high-grade underground gold mine which operated from 1898 to 1905. The core of the Property consists of 104 unpatented mining claims covering 20.2km² in the Ramsay-Wright Township in North-western Ontario.
The Option to purchase was signed with Nuinsco in October 2022. Nuinsco holds the claims through an underlying agreement with several prospectors who held the claims. In February 2023, FCM made a second payment to Nuinsco, and the claim ownership was transferred to FCMC for the central Sunbeam area. The third and final payment, (in total Cdn$700,00), was made in June. The Sunbeam extended (English Option extending over 24.8km²) is still part of an Option agreement with Nuinsco and the claim owner, which FCM has assumed.
Work conducted in 2023
Historic data and core reviews completed alongside extensive prospecting, sampling, and mapping program which includes rediscovery of a 3m wide quartz vein on the Pettigrew Trend. Mechanical stripping and then a targeted, systematic channel sampling programme has been undertaken at potential drill locations at the Pettigrew and Roy occurrences. Trail access for a drill rig into the same areas was also completed.
McKellar
Overview
The McKellar property, originally comprising 58 claims, covers ~10.1km² and is situated in prime geological terrain within the Coldwell complex. Located to the west of Generation Mining’s Palladium Project, McKellar is roughly 25 kilometres from the town of Marathon, the main service centre for Barrick’s Hemlo mine. McKellar has a number of historic ‘showings’ with significant values in both base (battery) and precious metals. McKellar was the second largest of the claim blocks that formed the Power Metals Resources PLC claim acquisition. Field work conducted in 2022 generated assessment credits that cover the property into 2023. Eight contiguous claims were ‘staked’ in February 2023 in the southern area of the claim block, extending the total claim area to 12.3km².
An exploration permit, required for ‘invasive’ exploration such as trenching, stripping and drilling has been drafted and after discussion with the First Nations, summited to the Provincial authorities.
Work conducted in 2023
In 2023, 18 sawn channel samples of approximately 1m were collected across the exposed diatreme, which historically reported REE. In addition, local scale prospecting resulted in 5 grab samples also being collected for assay.
Results of the 2023 programme (highest two samples) and other assayed samples from the diatreme area are included in the table below.
Element |
Historical assay results for selected elements (including REE’s), McKellar Creek Diatreme: |
FCM recent 2023 sampling showing two highest values, all ppm |
Gold Au |
25 ppb |
N/A |
Platinum Pt |
17 ppb |
N/A |
Neodymium Nd |
300 ppm |
259, 205 |
Lanthanum La |
400 ppm |
362, 253 |
Beryllium Be |
2.8 ppm |
5 all others BLD |
Cerium Ce |
513 ppm |
653, 503 |
Yttrium Y |
214 ppm |
287, 193 |
Strontium Sr |
1280 ppm |
1410, 1360 |
Thorium Th |
180 ppm |
145, 140 |
U308 |
38 ppm |
U: 32.8 23.4 |
Table showing historic as well as FCM generated sample results from the McKellar diatreme
Zigzag
Overview
The 6-unit claim group spans approximately 1.2km and covers the historic Tebishogeshik lithium occurrence as well as other mineralized sites. The claims are a part of an ‘Option’ Agreement with Nuinsco signed in March 2023. Nuinsco, whilst not the registered owners, hold an Option to Purchase agreement with the claim owner. By virtue of this agreement, FCM has committed to a four-year work programme as well as staged payments to Nuinsco, which can be accelerated. At the fulfilment of these obligations, FCM will own the claim option on an 80:20 arrangement with Nuinsco. At this point a JV would be entered into between FCM and Nuinsco for the further development of the mining claims. Should either party not wish to contribute to the JV they would be diluted as per an agreed dilution formula. If either Nuinsco or FCM is diluted to 10% ownership their entire remaining ownership would be automatically converted into an NSR.
Work conducted in 2023
During a winter reconnaissance of the Zigzag property in order to assess access the team identified an old trench for which sample information was not available. Four samples were collected from the in-situ debris flanking the trench. The results, tabulated below validate previous sampling, with values up to 1.0% (10,000ppm):
Sample number |
Lithium (Li) ppm |
Tantalum (Ta) ppm |
A1104880 |
1390 |
184 |
A1104881 |
5070 |
84.7 |
A1104882 |
10000 |
139 |
A1104883 |
1180 |
198 |
Table showing Zigzag grab sampling results
Sugar Cube
The Sugar Cube claim block of 205 claims, covering ~43km², is contiguous to the north-west of Silver Lake’s 1.6Moz+ Sugar Zone gold mine. Sugar Cube was one of the ‘seed’ properties that formed the pre-IPO company portfolio.
Work Conducted in 2023
Whilst virtually no ground-based exploration was conducted in 2022, in Q1 2023 a 578 line km geophysics survey comprising a helicopter borne low level 100m line spacing magnetic as well as electromagnetic (EM) survey was completed, which will provide sufficient credits to maintain this entire block through 2023
The survey data was processed by the contractor then passed to Paterson Grant Watson (PGW) who undertook a detailed interpretation. This interpretation will determine future field work to ‘ground-truth’ any identified anomalies.
Other Properties:
FCMC Inc. holds a further 85 claims totalling 18km² in three Properties in the Hemlo area, (Enable, Coco East and Magical), however, either no work was conducted, or no work reported in the public domain associated with these Properties.
III. Corporate and Financial Highlights
The start of 2023 has witnessed several corporate actions by the Company as the business positions itself to exploit the remarkable team and network it has developed. FCM now moves into a period of development that will see a major upturn in work across its portfolio of assets.
· On 7th February 2023 the Company announced the 2nd Instalment of the Sunbeam option was completed with a payment of CAD$150,000 made to Nuinsco.
· On 9th March 2023 the Company announced the Earn-In into the Zigzag Lithium project, which included a cash payment of $50,000 on signing and the issue of CAD$25,000 equivalent in ordinary shares.
· On 15th March 2023, the Company announced that it had received notice of an exercise of a total of 600,000 warrants with an exercise price of 12.5p, raising gross proceeds of £75,000 for the Company. Admission of the shares took place on the 21st of March 2023.
· On 29th March 2023 we announced receipt of the final payment of CAD$140,000 of the 2022/3 Ontario Junior Exploration Grant (“OJEP”) for work completed on the North Hemlo property.
· On 26th June 2023 the Company announced the placing, subscription, and exercise of warrants of 10,491,700 ordinary shares raising gross proceeds £1,049,170 all at the price of 10p per share. Admission of these shares took place on or before 10th July 2023.
· The Annual General Meeting (“AGM”) of the Company was held on 29th June 2023, at which all resolutions were duly passed.
James Knowles, Chairman commented:
The first half of 2023 has been an exciting time for First Class Metals. Following on from the IPO in July 2022 and successful inaugural field season we looked to develop our diverse portfolio of precious and base metal focused assets in Ontario further.
With fieldwork planned and in operation across Sunbeam, North Hemlo, Esa, Enable and Zigzag the year started with a very active program. Behind the field work the Company’s board progressed drilling permits and amendments to existing permitted properties.
With the addition of the Zigzag Lithium project ‘earn-In’ we now have exposure to a key battery metal project, located in an area of Ontario which holds numerous other developing hard rock lithium projects and future processing infrastructure.
The progress of the Company during the period has been tremendous and with the successful completion of our fund raise, on 26th June 2023, First Class Metals is funded to continue to drive through the exciting planned workstreams ahead.
I would like to take this opportunity thank and congratulate our teams and partners in Canada for their hard work and results and to state that we very much look forward to continuing to push this exciting portfolio of assets onwards.
IV. Financial Review
Funding
At the period end, the Group was funded through investment from its shareholders following successful post-IPO fund raising events. A sum of £1,186,478.20 was raised through warrant conversion and private placement.
Current Assets
At 30th June 2023, the Group had trade and other receivables of £157,632 (Dec 2022: £226,217, June 2022: £31,177).
Liquidity, cash and cash equivalents
At 30th June 2023, the Group held £844,131 (Dec 2022: £712,715, 30 June 2022: £227,683) of cash and cash equivalents, all of which are denominated in pound sterling.
Going concern
The financial information has been prepared on the basis that the Group will continue as a going concern.
As a junior exploration company, the Directors are aware that the Company must seek funds from the market to meet its investment and exploration plans and to maintain its listing status.
The Group’s reliance on a successful fund raising presents a material uncertainty that may cast doubt on the Group’s ability to continue to operate as planned and to pay its liabilities as they fall due.
The Company successfully raised £1,186,478.20 in the period ended 30th June 2023 through a combination of issuing new shares and warrant conversions.
The Directors are aware of the reliance on fund raising within the next 12 months and the material uncertainty this presents but having reviewed the Group’s working capital forecasts they believe the Group is well placed to manage its business risks successfully providing the fund raising is successful.
Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities
The Directors are responsible for preparing this report and the financial statements in accordance with applicable United Kingdom law and regulations and UK adopted International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”).
Company law requires the Directors to prepare financial statements for each financial period which present fairly the financial position of the Company and the financial performance and cash flows of the Company for that period. In preparing those financial statements, the Directors are required to:
• select suitable accounting policies and then apply them consistently;
• make judgements and estimates that are reasonable and prudent;
• present information, including accounting policies, in a manner that provides relevant, reliable, comparable and understandable information;
• state whether applicable IFRS standards have been followed, subject to any material departures disclosed and explained in the financial statements;
• prepare the financial statements on the going concern basis unless it is inappropriate to presume that the Company will continue in business; and
• provide additional disclosures when compliance with the specific requirements in IFRS standards is insufficient to enable users to understand the impact of particular transactions, other events and conditions on the entity’s financial position and financial performance.
The Directors are responsible for keeping adequate accounting records that are sufficient to show and explain the Company’s transactions and disclose with reasonable accuracy at any time the financial position of the Company and enable them to ensure that the Company financial statements comply with the Companies Act 2006 and Article 4 of the IAS Regulation. They are also responsible for safeguarding the assets of the Company and hence for taking reasonable steps for the prevention and detection of fraud and other irregularities.
Under applicable law and regulations, the Directors are also responsible for preparing a Strategic Report, Directors’ Report, Directors’ Remuneration Report and Corporate Governance Statement that comply with that law and those regulations, and for ensuring that the Annual report includes information required by the Listing Rules of the Financial Conduct Authority.
The financial statements are published on the Company’s website https://www.firstclassmetalsplc.com/. The work carried out by the Auditor does not involve consideration of the maintenance and integrity of this website and accordingly, the Auditor accepts no responsibility for any changes that have occurred to the financial statements since they were initially presented on the website. Visitors to the website need to be aware that legislation in the United Kingdom covering the preparation and dissemination of the financial statements may differ from legislation in their jurisdiction.
The Directors confirm that to the best of their knowledge the Company financial statements give a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities, financial position of the Company.
V. Half yearly accounts
Consolidated Income Statement for the Period from 1 January 2023 to 30 June 2023
6 months to |
6 months to |
12 months to |
|
Revenue |
– |
– |
– |
Cost of sales |
– |
– |
– |
Gross loss |
– |
– |
– |
Administrative expenses |
(693,460) |
(159,790) |
(693,583) |
Operating loss |
(693,460) |
(159,790) |
(693,583) |
Finance income |
2,058 |
12 |
461 |
Finance costs |
(53,298) |
– |
(7,918) |
Net finance cost |
(51,240) |
12 |
(7,457) |
Loss before tax |
(744,700) |
(159,778) |
(701,040) |
Loss for the period |
(744,700) |
(159,778) |
(701,040) |
Profit/(loss) attributable to: |
|||
Owners of the company |
(744,700) |
(159,778) |
(701,040) |
Loss for the period |
(744,700) |
(159,778) |
(701,040) |
|
Items that may be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss |
||||
Foreign currency translation (losses)/gains |
(84) |
123,772 |
98 |
|
Total comprehensive (loss)/income for the period |
(744,784) |
(36,006) |
(700,942) |
|
Total comprehensive (loss)/income attributable to: |
||||
Owners of the company |
(744,784) |
(36,006) |
(700,942) |
|
Loss per share: |
(1.06)p |
(0.17)p |
(1.31)p |
|
Consolidated Statement of Financial Position as at 30 June 2023
Note |
30 June |
30 June |
31 December |
|
Assets |
||||
Non-current assets |
||||
Property, plant and equipment |
5 |
1,169 |
– |
812 |
Mineral property exploration and evaluation |
4 |
2,914,105 |
1,751,778 |
2,256,720 |
2,915,274 |
1,751,778 |
2,257,532 |
||
Current assets |
||||
Trade and other receivables |
7 |
157,632 |
31,177 |
226,217 |
Cash and cash equivalents |
8 |
844,131 |
227,683 |
712,715 |
1,001,763 |
258,860 |
938,932 |
||
Total assets |
3,917,037 |
2,010,638 |
3,196,464 |
|
Equity and liabilities |
||||
Equity |
||||
Share capital |
9 |
(79,551) |
(50,944) |
(69,049) |
Share premium |
(4,470,806) |
(1,486,947) |
(3,395,168) |
|
Equity reserve |
(22,201) |
– |
(10,258) |
|
Foreign currency translation reserve |
(14) |
– |
(98) |
|
Retained earnings |
1,614,079 |
204,700 |
869,379 |
|
Equity attributable to owners of the company |
(2,958,493) |
(1,333,191) |
(2,605,194) |
|
Non-current liabilities |
||||
Other non-current financial liabilities |
– |
– |
(15,353) |
|
Current liabilities |
||||
Trade and other payables |
12 |
(459,558) |
(377,448) |
(357,325) |
Loans and borrowings |
10 |
(498,986) |
(300,000) |
(218,592) |
(958,544) |
(677,448) |
(575,917) |
||
Total liabilities |
(958,544) |
(677,448) |
(591,270) |
|
Total equity and liabilities |
(3,917,037) |
(2,010,639) |
(3,196,464) |
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity for the Period from 1 January 2023 to 30 June 2023
Unaudited |
Share capital |
Share premium |
Equity reserve |
Foreign currency translation |
Retained earnings |
Total equity |
At 1 January 2023 |
69,049 |
3,395,168 |
10,258 |
98 |
(869,379) |
2,605,194 |
Loss for the period |
– |
– |
– |
– |
(744,700) |
(744,700) |
Other comprehensive income |
– |
– |
– |
(84) |
– |
(84) |
Total comprehensive income |
– |
– |
– |
(84) |
(744,700) |
(744,784) |
New share capital subscribed |
10,502 |
1,075,638 |
– |
– |
– |
1,086,140 |
Other equity reserve movements |
– |
– |
11,943 |
– |
– |
11,943 |
At 30 June 2023 |
79,551 |
4,470,806 |
22,201 |
14 |
(1,614,079) |
2,958,493 |
Unaudited |
Share capital |
Share premium |
Equity reserve |
Foreign currency translation |
Retained earnings |
Total equity |
At 1 January 2022 |
943 |
1,536,947 |
– |
– |
(168,339) |
1,369,551 |
Loss for the period |
– |
– |
– |
– |
(36,006) |
(36,006) |
Other comprehensive income |
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
Total comprehensive income |
– |
1,536,947 |
– |
– |
(204,345) |
(1,333,545) |
New share capital subscribed |
50,000 |
(50,000) |
– |
– |
– |
– |
Other equity reserve movements |
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
At 30 June 2022 |
50,943 |
1,486,947 |
– |
– |
(204,345) |
(1,333,545) |
Audited |
Share capital |
Share premium |
Equity reserve |
Foreign currency translation |
Retained earnings |
Total equity |
At 1 January 2022 |
943 |
1,536,947 |
– |
– |
(168,339) |
1,369,551 |
Loss for the period |
– |
– |
– |
– |
(701,040) |
(701,040) |
Other comprehensive income |
– |
– |
– |
98 |
– |
98 |
Total comprehensive income |
– |
– |
– |
98 |
(701,040) |
(700,942) |
New share capital subscribed |
68,106 |
1,858,221 |
– |
– |
– |
1,926,327 |
Other equity reserve movements |
– |
– |
10,258 |
– |
– |
10,258 |
At 31 December 2022 |
69,049 |
3,395,168 |
10,258 |
98 |
(869,379) |
2,605,194 |
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the Period from 1 January 2023 to 30 June 2023
Note |
6 months to |
6 months to |
12 months to |
|
Cash flows from operating activities |
||||
Loss for the period |
(744,700) |
(36,006) |
(701,040) |
|
Adjustments to cash flows from non-cash items |
||||
Depreciation and amortisation |
266 |
(123,771) |
162 |
|
Foreign exchange loss/(gain) |
80,474 |
– |
(29,831) |
|
Finance income |
(2,058) |
(12) |
(461) |
|
Finance costs |
53,298 |
934 |
7,918 |
|
(612,720) |
(158,855) |
(723,252) |
||
Working capital adjustments |
||||
Decrease/(increase) in trade and other receivables |
7 |
68,585 |
(1,985) |
(176,917) |
Increase in trade and other payables |
12 |
102,233 |
270,866 |
266,096 |
Net cash flow from operating activities |
(441,902) |
110,026 |
(634,073) |
|
Cash flows from investing activities |
||||
Interest received |
2,058 |
– |
461 |
|
Acquisitions of property plant and equipment |
(624) |
– |
(974) |
|
Acquisition of mineral property exploration and evaluation |
4 |
(729,823) |
(572,081) |
(1,013,050) |
Net cash flows from investing activities |
(728,389) |
(572,081) |
(1,013,563) |
|
Cash flows from financing activities |
||||
Proceeds from issue of ordinary shares, net of issue costs |
1,098,083 |
– |
1,593,549 |
|
Proceeds from other borrowing draw downs |
280,394 |
300,000 |
587,180 |
|
Foreign exchange loss/(gain) |
– |
123,771 |
– |
|
Repayment of other borrowing |
(15,353) |
– |
(23,747) |
|
Net cash flows from financing activities |
1,363,124 |
423,771 |
2,156,982 |
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
192,833 |
(38,284) |
509,346 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at 1 January |
712,715 |
267,244 |
267,244 |
|
Effect of exchange rate fluctuations on cash held |
(61,417) |
(1,277) |
(63,875) |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at 30 June |
844,131 |
227,683 |
712,715 |
Notes to the Financial Statements for the Period from 1 January 2023 to 30 June 2023
1 |
General information |
The Company is a public company limited by share capital, incorporated and domiciled in England and Wales.
The principal activity of the Company was that of a holding company.
The principal activity of the Group was that of the exploration of gold and other semi-precious metals as well as battery metals critical to energy storage and power generation solutions.
The Company’s ordinary shares are traded on the London Stock Exchange (LSE) under the ticker symbol FCM.
The address of its registered office is:
Suite 16 Freckleton Business Centre
Freckleton Street
Blackburn
Lancashire BB2 2AL
United Kingdom
These unaudited interim results comprise the Company and its subsidiary, First Class Metals Canada Inc.
The Company’s interim report and accounts for the six months ended 30 June 2023 have been prepared using the recognition and measurement principles of International Accounting Standards in conformity with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006.
These interim financial statements for the six months ended 30 June 2023 should be read in conjunction with the financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2022, which have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRSs”) as applied in accordance with the provisions of the Companies Act 2006. The interim report and accounts do not include all the information and disclosures required in the annual financial statements.
The interim report and accounts have been prepared in accordance with IAS34 (interim financial statements) and on the basis of the accounting policies, presentation and methods of computation as set out in the Company’s December 2022 Annual Report and Accounts, except for those that relate to new standards and interpretations effective for the first time for periods beginning on (or after) 1 January 2023 and will be adopted in the 2023 annual financial statements.
The financial information is presented in Pounds Sterling, rounded to the nearest pound and has been prepared under the historical cost convention.
The interim report and accounts do not comprise statutory accounts within the meaning of section 434 of the Companies Act 2006. These interim financial statements were approved by the Board of Directors on 28 September 2023. The results for the six months to 30 June 2023 and the comparative results for the six months to 30 June 2021 are unaudited. The figures for the year ended 31 December 2022 are extracted from the audited statutory accounts of the Company for that period.
Going Concern
The Directors have confirmed their intention to support the Company whilst it is in the process of raising funds to achieve its business plans. The Directors consider that sufficient resources are available to support the Company’s operations for the foreseeable future and therefore believe that the going concern basis of preparation is appropriate.
2 Loss per share
|
|
6 months ended 30 June 2023 |
6 months ended 30 June 2022 |
12 months ended 31 December 2022 |
|
|
(unaudited) |
(unaudited) |
(audited) |
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations |
£ |
(744,700) |
(36,006) |
(701,040) |
Weighted average number of shares |
|
70,410,322 |
21,673,976 |
53,456,619 |
Basic and fully diluted loss per share |
Pence |
(1.06) |
(0.17) |
(1.31) |
Basic loss per share is calculated by dividing the loss attributable to equity holders of the Company by the weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue during the period.
There are potentially issuable shares all of which relate to share warrants issued as part of placings in 2022. However, due to the losses for the year the impact of the potential additional shares is anti-dilutive and has therefore not been recognised in the calculation of the fully diluted loss per share.
3 |
Earnings per share |
The calculation of the basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS) has been based on the loss attributable to ordinary shareholders and weighted-average number of ordinary shares outstanding.
4 |
Mineral property exploration and evaluation |
|
|||
|
Mineral property exploration and evaluation |
|
|||
|
Cost or valuation |
||||
|
At 1 January 2022 |
1,179,697 |
|||
|
Additions |
1,013,050 |
|||
|
Foreign exchange movements |
63,973 |
|||
|
At 31 December 2022 |
2,256,720 |
|||
|
At 1 January 2023 |
2,256,720 |
|||
|
Additions |
729,823 |
|||
|
Foreign exchange movements |
(72,438) |
|||
|
At 30 June 2023 |
2,914,105 |
|||
|
Amortisation |
||||
|
At 30 June 2023 |
– |
|||
|
Carrying amount |
||||
|
At 30 June 2023 |
2,914,105 |
|||
|
At 1 January 2022 |
1,179,697 |
|||
5 |
Property, plant and equipment |
|
|||
Group
|
Furniture, fittings and equipment |
|||||
|
Cost |
|
||||
|
Additions |
974 |
|
|||
|
At 31 December 2022 |
974 |
|
|||
|
At 1 January 2023 |
974 |
|
|||
|
Additions |
624 |
|
|||
|
At 30 June 2023 |
1,598 |
|
|||
|
Depreciation |
|
||||
|
Charge for year |
162 |
|
|||
|
At 31 December 2022 |
162 |
|
|||
|
At 1 January 2023 |
162 |
|
|||
|
Charge for the period |
267 |
|
|||
|
At 30 June 2023 |
429 |
|
|||
|
Carrying amount |
|
||||
|
At 30 June 2023 |
1,169 |
|
|||
|
At 31 December 2022 |
812 |
|
|||
6 |
Investments |
|
||||
Group subsidiaries
Details of the group subsidiaries as at 30 June 2023 are as follows:
Name of subsidiary |
Principal activity |
Registered office |
Proportion of ownership interest and voting rights held |
2022 |
First Class Metals Canada Inc.* |
Mining of other non-ferrous metal ores |
55 York Street Canada |
100% |
100% |
* indicates direct investment of the company
7 |
Trade and other receivables |
|
|||||
|
30 June |
30 June |
31 December |
||||
|
Accrued income |
– |
– |
85,979 |
|||
|
Prepayments |
60,479 |
8,220 |
67,919 |
|||
|
Other receivables |
97,153 |
22,957 |
72,319 |
|||
|
157,632 |
31,177 |
226,217 |
||||
|
|||||||
8 |
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|||||||
|
30 June |
30 June |
31 December |
||||||
|
Cash at bank |
844,131 |
227,683 |
712,715 |
|||||
9 |
Share capital |
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
Allotted, called up and fully paid shares
|
30 June |
31 December |
||||
|
No. |
£ |
No. |
£ |
||
|
Ordinary shares of £0.001 each |
79,551,294 |
79,551 |
69,048,707 |
69,049 |
|
|
||||||
10 |
Loans and borrowings |
|
||||
30 June |
30 June |
31 December |
|
Current loans and borrowings |
|||
Finance lease liabilities |
– |
– |
13,433 |
Convertible debt |
498,986 |
300,000 |
205,159 |
498,986 |
300,000 |
218,592 |
The group’s exposure to market and liquidity risks, including maturity analysis, relating to loans and borrowings is disclosed in note 15 “Financial risk review”.
In October 2022, the company has access to a drawdown facility of £1,000,000, of which £500,000 was drawn down as of June 30, 2023.
11 |
Leases |
Lease liabilities maturity analysis
A maturity analysis of lease liabilities based on undiscounted gross cash flow is reported in the table below:
|
30 June |
30 June |
31 December |
|||
|
Less than one year |
– |
– |
13,433 |
||
12 |
Trade and other payables |
|
||||
|
30 June |
30 June |
31 December |
|||
|
Trade payables |
183,257 |
161,062 |
82,006 |
||
|
Accrued expenses |
269,562 |
32,051 |
236,810 |
||
|
Social security and other taxes |
4,875 |
3,535 |
7,667 |
||
|
Outstanding defined contribution pension costs |
1,864 |
– |
– |
||
|
Other payables |
– |
180,800 |
30,842 |
||
|
459,558 |
377,448 |
357,325 |
|||
13 |
Financial risk review |
|
||||
Group
Principle risks & uncertainties are detailed in the most recent Annual report (page 41 & 42) which can be found on the company’s website and remain unchanged. This Annual Report can be found at: 2022+Annu\al+Report+&+Financial+Statements.pdf (squarespace.com)
In addition, this note presents information about the group’s exposure to financial risks and the group’s management of capital.
Capital risk management
The Group’s objectives when managing capital are: (a) To maintain a flexible capital structure which optimizes the cost of capital at acceptable risk; (b) To meet external capital requirements on debt and credit facilities; (c) To ensure adequate capital to support long-term growth strategy; and (d) To provide an adequate return to shareholders. The Group continuously monitors and reviews the capital structure to ensure the objectives are met. Management defines capital as the combination of its indebtedness and equity balances, as disclosed in note 13, and manages the capital structure within the context of the business strategy, general economic conditions, market conditions in the power industry and the risk characteristics of assets. The Group’s objectives in managing capital and the definition of capital remain unchanged throughout the period. External factors, such as the economic environment, have not altered the Group’s objectives in managing capital.
Credit risk
The group’s definition of credit risk is Credit risk is the risk of financial loss to the Group if a customer or counterparty to a financial instrument fails to meet its contractual obligations. At present the Group does not have any customers and its risk on cash and bank is mitigated by holding of the funds in an “A” rated bank.
Liquidity risk
The group’s definition of liquidity risk is Liquidity risk is the risk that the Group will not be able to meet its financial obligations as they become due. The Group manages liquidity risk by maintaining adequate cash balances.
Market risk
The group’s definition of market risk is Market risk is the risk that changes in market prices, such as commodity prices, will affect the Group’s earnings. The objective of market risk management is to identify both the market risk and the Group’s option to mitigate this risk.
A majority of the Group’s operating costs will be incurred in US and Canadian dollars, whilst the Group has raised capital in £ Sterling. The Group will incur exploration costs in US and Canadian Dollars, but it has raised capital in £ Sterling. Fluctuations in exchange rates of the US Dollar and Canadian Dollar against £ Sterling may materially affect the Group’s translated results of operations. In addition, given the relatively small size of the Group, it may not be able to effectively hedge against risks associated with currency exchange rates at commercially realistic rates. Accordingly, any significant adverse fluctuations in currency rates could have a material adverse effect on the Group’s business, financial condition and prospects to a much greater extent than might be expected for a larger enterprise.
Interest rate risk is the risk that the fair value of the future cash flows of a financial instrument will fluctuate because of changes in market rates of interest. As the Group has no significant interest bearing assets or liabilities, the group’s operating cash flows are substantially independent of changes in market interest rates. Therefore, the Group is not exposed to significant interest rate risk.
14 |
Post balance sheet events In July FCM announced that it has signed an agreement with OnGold Investment Corp (“OnGold”) in respect to the Pickle Lake Property, McGill Township in Ontario . The property consists of 163 single cell mining claims, comprising 3,455ha (hectares). Contiguous to both First Class Metals, North Hemlo Property and Palladium One (TSXV:PDM) Tyko Project. Eleven high priority targets defined on the property from previous operators work program. Winter Lake Sediment sampling by FCM across the area as part of the due diligence process returned gold grades of up to 103ppb gold (Au) which is deemed to be extremely high for the wider area.
|
|
15 |
Related party transactions |
|
Parties are considered to be related if one party has the ability (directly or indirectly) to control the other party or exercise significant influence over the other party in making financial and operating decisions. Parties are also considered related if they are subject to common control or common significant influence. Related parties may be individuals or corporate entities.
During the period, the Group incurred consultancy and travel expenses in relation to the intangible assets from Specialist Exploration Services (Scotland) Limited, a company controlled by a common director. The services were for £53,850.46 (Dec 2022: £121,965) of which £7,350 (Dec 2022: £7,000) was outstanding at the year end.
On the 26th Of June 2023 Marc J Sale subscribed to £37,500 shares in a private placement totalling 375,000 shares. The shares will be held in the name of Specialist Exploration Services Scotland Ltd which is a UK registered company controlled by Mr Marc J Sale.
#FCM First Class Metals PLC – Zigzag Lithium Update & Issue of Equity
18th September 2023 / Leave a comment
First Class Metals PLC (“First Class Metals” “FCM” or the “Company”) the UK metals exploration company seeking economic metal discoveries across its extensive Canadian Schreiber-Hemlo, Sunbeam and Zigzag land holdings is pleased to announce the launch of systematic exploration campaign at the Zigzag Lithium project in the Province of Ontario Canada. (“Zigzag” or the “Project”).
Highlights:
· The Zigzag project is considered highly prospective for the discovery of economic pegmatite hosted lithium mineralisation. Historically several outcropping lenses of a potentially cohesive lithium-tantalum bearing pegmatite has been sampled across the property with encouraging results.
–Historic grades at surface up to 1.68% lithium (Li20) over 7.9m and 0.168% tantalum (Ta205) over 2.54m. The claim group covers the historic Tebishogeshik occurrence.
–Sampling by Nuinsco returned highly anomalous lithium (Li), tantalum (Ta), and rubidium (Rb), peaking at 3.55% Li20 , 836 ppm Ta₂O5, and 4,003 ppm rubidium Rb2O.
-Several shallow historic drill holes along the occurrence have returned encouraging results, including, (in separate drill holes) an intersection grading 1.08% Li2O over 6.1m and a separate intersection of 399.8ppm Ta2O5 over 2.92m.
· First pass limited sampling whilst achieving access returned samples with a peak of 1.7% Li20 and 346ppmTantalum, 104 ppm Niobium and >3000ppm Rubidium.
· Currently an experienced geological team is on the project, undertaking a prospecting and mapping of the known exposures.
· In parallel with this initial systematic sampling programme the team has initiated a sawn channel sampling programme along strike at intervals across the exposed pegmatite outcrop.
· Marc J Sale CEO visited the project in the last week to oversee the commencement of operations.
· A further thirty-nine grab samples have been collected and are at the laboratory for assay and will be reported as soon as available.
Figure 1-Historical drill holes and sampling results from the Zigzag project.
Marc J Sale First Class Metals CEO Commented:
“The initial, non-systematic grab samples collected by FCM, myself included, have demonstrated and validated the potential indicated by the historic samples from the Zigzag showing. Having visited the property and walked the outcrop I am confident that drilling will support the tenor of assays reported to date. Whilst we await further assays, FCM has embarked on a prospecting and systematic sampling programme including sawn channel sampling of ‘exposed’ outcrop in the central zone. I am confident that further outcrops in this zone and along strike will be identified. The focus of the current, ongoing programme is to bring Zigzag to a drill ready status in a ‘fast track,’ but diligent manner.’
Photograph of pegmatite sample exhibiting significant spodumenes crystals Li [AlSi2O6]
2023 Sample Results to date:
Sample |
|
|
|
|
Number |
Lithium (Li) % |
Tantalum (Ta) ppm |
Niobium (Nb) ppm |
Rubidium (Rb) ppm |
A1104880 |
1.39 |
184 |
104 |
884 |
A1104881 |
0.51 |
85 |
48 |
2770 |
A1104882 |
1.0 |
139 |
81 |
855 |
A1104883 |
0.012 |
198 |
88 |
3750 |
Sample-1 |
0.07 |
346 |
72 |
1140 |
Sample-2 |
0.41 |
219 |
79 |
1130 |
Sample-3 |
0.196 |
79 |
54 |
361 |
F006543 |
1.7 |
75 |
41 |
820 |
F006544 |
1.63 |
235 |
90 |
1200 |
F006545 |
1.65 |
115 |
60 |
1190 |
Table of the sample results to date. Note these are ‘non-systematic samples collected during access appraisal. (Values rounded for clarity).
Background & Location
The project is less than 100km from Armstrong in northwest Ontario in the Seymour Lake area (See figure 2 ), a district already proved to be prospective for hard rock, pegmatite hosted lithium. Existing infrastructure currently in place in the local area is expected to be further bolstered in the future by the planned Jackfish Hydro project and a spodumene Process Plant at the Green Technology Metals, Seymour site which is just over 10km away.
The six-unit claim group includes a mapped structure of 800m (Tebishogeshik occurrence) and is wholly contained within the claim block, the lithium-tantalum mineralization is pegmatite-hosted with significant rubidium and niobium mineralisation also reported. All of which are ‘critical minerals’ as identified by the 1Canadian and United Kingdom Governments.
Previous workers of the Tebishogeshik occurrence have identified Li2O and Ta2O5 mineralization along the entire strike of the known outcrop from sampling at surface, grading up to 1.68% Li2O over 7.9m and 0.168% Ta2O5 over 2.54m in separate channels samples. Several shallow historic drill holes along the known outcrop have returned significant intersections, including, (in separate drill holes) an intersection grading 1.08% Li2O over 6.1m and 399.8ppm Ta2O5 over 2.92m. Both intersections were less than 20m down hole. The structure is open along strike and to depth and remains to be fully evaluated.
Lithium-ion battery production capacity pipeline globally to 2030 increases up to 8.1 TWh and North American EV battery production is forecast to reach 1 TWh annually by 2030. Even if production from known current assets were to double against planned capacities, expected North American demand alone would exceed supply by 40%.
Figure 2-Location of the Zigzag property within a ‘key’ area for Ontario’s rapidly expanding lithium industry.
Issue of Equity & Total Voting Rights
159,735 new ordinary shares are being issued to Nuinsco Resources Limited in respect of the year one Zigzag ‘option to earn in’ (2see news release 9th March), they will rank pari passu with the Company’s existing issued ordinary shares. The issue price is 11.15p which represents $30,000CAD, being the consideration for the year one share element fees of the option.
The Company intends to allot and issue these new ordinary shares under its existing authorities on a non-pre-emptive basis.
The Company will be making its application to admit the new ordinary shares to the Official List of the FCA and to trading on the Main Market (Standard List) of the LSE. Admission is expected to occur on the 20th of September 2023.
2https://polaris.brighterir.com/public/first_class_metals/news/rns/story/x8eolox
For further information, please contact:
James Knowles, Executive Chairman |
07488 362641 |
|
Marc J Sale, CEO |
07711 093532 |
|
Ayub Bodi, Executive Director |
07860 598086 |
First Equity Limited
(Financial Adviser & Broker)
Jonathan Brown |
0207 3742212 |
|
Jason Robertson |
0207 3742212 |
|
First Class Metals PLC – Background
First Class Metals is focussed on exploration in Ontario, Canada which is considered a top global destination for exploration with a robust and thriving junior mineral exploration sector. Specifically, the Hemlo ‘camp’ is a proven world class address for gold /VMS exploration. This geological terrane has significant production, both base / precious metals and a prolific number of exploration projects and numerous prospector’s ‘showings’.
FCM currently holds 100% ownership of seven claim blocks covering over 180km² along a 150km strike of the Hemlo-Schreiber-Dayohessarah greenstone belt which also contains the >23M oz shear hosted Hemlo gold mine operated by Barrick Gold. Late last year FCM completed the option to purchase the historical high grade (gold) Sunbeam past producing mine
The significant potential of the properties for precious, base and battery metals relate to: ‘nearology’ insomuch that all properties lie close to identified mineral anomalism, for example Palladium One’s RJ and Smoke Lake nickel projects are close to the FCM’s West Pickle Lake drill proven Ni-Cu project. This also demonstrates the second critical asset the properties hold: vector, anomalies, be they geological, geochemical, or geophysical that have demonstrated mineral potential extend on to FCM’s properties.
The inferred shear on the Esa property is being explored by neighbours both to the west and east where it crosses into their properties. Furthermore, the properties have not been extensively explored either historically or more contemporaneously. This is attributable to the overall lack of outcrop. However, modern exploration techniques are better able to ‘see through’ the ground cover and to identify anomalies.
Forward Looking Statements
Certain statements in this announcement may contain forward-looking statements which are based on the Company’s expectations, intentions and projections regarding its future performance, anticipated events or trends and other matters that are not historical facts. Such forward-looking statements can be identified by the fact that they do not relate only to historical or current facts. Forward-looking statements sometimes use words such as ‘aim’, ‘anticipate’, ‘target’, ‘expect’, ‘estimate’, ‘intend’, ‘plan’, ‘goal’, ‘believe’, or other words of similar meaning. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Given these risks and uncertainties, prospective investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of such statements and, except as required by applicable law, the Company undertakes no obligation to update or revise publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
#KAV Kavango Resources PLC – Ditau: Additional Exploration Holes Logged
5th April 2023 / Leave a comment
Kavango Resources (LSE:KAV), the Southern Africa focussed exploration company, is pleased to announce that it has identified further evidence of a potential wider mineralised system at the Company’s Ditau Project in SW Botswana.
Having confirmed the 470m strike extent of the mineralised Banded Iron Formation (“BIF”) encountered in Hole DITDD004 (announced >>> 31 March 2023), Kavango has completed logging of two historic exploration holes that were drilled in the vicinity of Target i10. Kavango drilled DITDD004 in April 2022 to test Target i10.
Drill core from the two historic exploration holes X077_H002 (“X077”) & X081_H001 (“X081”) both exhibit clear evidence of mineralisation.
X077 is 470m from DITDD004. It was drilled to 189m and intercepted the same mineralised BIF that Dr. Hamid Mumin recently identified as a large-scale system, primarily prospective for possible lode gold mineralisation. The mineralised BIF in X077 remained open at depth and Kavango is considering drilling a twin hole to test this target.
FIGURE 1: End of Hole X077 at 188.93m, pyrite and carbonate both increase at end of hole, suggesting increasing mineralisation, open at depth.
X081 is 3km to the SW of DITDD004 and was drilled to a depth of 144m. The core is highly weathered and contains extensive relict textures after pyrite, and iron oxides in veins. There are clear signs of locally intense hydrothermal activity.
Kavango has sent samples from X077 and X081 for assay testing.
Ben Turney, Chief Executive Officer of Kavango, stated,
“Gaining access to exploration Holes X077 and X081 via the Botswana Geological Institute could prove to be decisive in our Ditau exploration programme.
X077 has already demonstrated the potential strike extent of the thick mineralised Banded Iron Formation we intercepted with our Hole DITDD004 last April.
However, the identification of X081 opens an even more intriguing line of investigation for us. Evidence of intense local hydrothermal activity and the clear presence of iron oxides and sulphides strengthen the possibility of a regional exploration play.
We now look forward to assay results to guide our next steps.“
OVERVIEW
· Two exploration holes were drilled in the vicinity of Kavango’s Target i10 at Ditau. The core from these holes is now the property of the Botswana Geoscience Institute (the “BGI”).
o Hole X077_H002 (“X077”) drilled to 189m & lies 470m NW of DITDD004
o Hole X081_H001 (“X081”) drilled to 144m & lies 3km to the SW of DITDD004
o Holes X077 & X081 were abandoned by the party who drilled them, once it was established the underlying targets were not kimberlites and therefore had no potential for diamonds.
· With the cooperation of the BGI, Kavango has reviewed the drill core from X077 and X081. The Company’s initial findings are:
o X077 encountered the same BIF as DITDD004, with clear visual evidence of mineralisation. This confirms the mineralised BIF is continuous for at least 470m. X077 is open at depth.
FIGURE 2: Mineralised Banded Iron Formation (BIF) identified in Hole X077 appears to represent acontinuation of the same mineralised BIF Kavango intercepted in its Hole DITDD004
o X081 has further clear visual evidence of mineralisation and locally intense hydrothermal activity.
Kavango will now send samples from X077 and X081 for assay testing.
INITIAL REVIEW OF DRILL CORE
The BGI granted a team from Kavango permission to log two previous drillholes (X077 and X081) drilled in the vicinity of Kavango’s Hole DITDD004 in the Ditau Project.
Holes X077 and X081 were drilled with diamond core to depths of 188.93m and 143.93m respectively.
X077 is located 470m NW of DITDD004 and X081 is 3km to the SW and is coincident with a small magnetic anomaly.
DITDD004 contained anomalous gold and copper values, hosted in a Banded Iron Formation (BIF), and has been characterised by Dr. Hamid Mumin [announced >>> 06 March 2023] as a BIF hosted lode gold style of mineralising system, with the possibility for Volcanogenic Massive Sulphides also to be investigated.
Kavango has carried out detailed logging, pXRF determinations, and magnetic susceptibility measurements on X077 and X081. Initial results from this analysis are as follows:
Hole X077
· Extensive brecciated BIF seen, as in Hole DITDD004. This confirms the 470m strike extent of this formation.
· Pyrite observed, plus (at 147m) blebs of chalcopyrite, 15mm in diameter.
FIGURE 3: Extensive pyrite seen in X077, this example is at 155m depth.
· X077 stopped at 188.93m in strong carbonate alteration with pyrite, associated with veining. The degree of alteration was observed to be increasing with depth.
· The mineralising system that has caused this is considered by Kavango to extend beyond the end of the hole. Termination of X077 appears consistent with a company exploring for diamonds as the core was clearly not a kimberlite and appears prospective for metal mineralisation instead.
· X077 confirms that the mineralisation seen in hole DITDD004 is not isolated and is part of a wider system.
Hole X081
· X081 was drilled on a different magnetic target to Target i10.
· X081 is a shallower hole (drilled to 143.93m) and is significantly oxidised.
FIGURE 4: Increasing levels of (now oxidised) sulphides indicated towards the end of Hole X081, which was drilled to 143.93m, with mineralisation open at depth
· It is highly weathered and contains extensive relict textures after pyrite, and iron oxides in veins.
· There are clear signs of locally intense hydrothermal activity.
· Again, the mineralising system in X081 is considered by Kavango to extend beyond the end of the hole. It is unclear whether the mineralising system is related to that seen between Holes DITDD004 and X077. Kavango will investigate this through assay testing of core samples.
· Termination of X081 appears consistent with a company exploring for diamonds as the core was clearly not a kimberlite and appears prospective for metal mineralisation instead.
NEXT STEPS:
· Core cutting is complete and Kavango’s team will send samples from X077 and X081 for assay testing.
· Kavango will in the interim review pXRF and other data in parallel with this to advance its interpretation at Ditau.
· Kavango to share all data and samples with Dr. Mumin in order to upgrade confidence in this exploration model and refine our exploration plan.
Kavango Resources plc
Ben Turney
bturney@kavangoresources.com
First Equity (Broker)
+44 207 374 2212
Jason Robertson
Kavango Competent Person Statement
The technical information contained in this announcement pertaining to geology and exploration have been read and approved by Brett Grist BSc(Hons) FAusIMM (CP). Mr Grist is a Fellow of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy with Chartered Professional status. Mr Grist has sufficient experience that is relevant to the exploration programmes and geology of the main styles of mineralisation and deposit types under consideration to act as a Qualified Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’.