Home » Posts tagged 'Green fertilisers'

Tag Archives: Green fertilisers

Salt Lake Potash #SO4 – Appendix 3B and Issue of Placement Shares

Salt Lake Potash Limited (the Company) has today released the following information on the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX), in accordance with the ASX Listing Rules.

The 25,476,000 ordinary shares of no par value (Ordinary Shares) represent the first tranche of the placement of 37.5 million Ordinary Shares (Placement) that was announced on 6 June 2019.

The balance of 12,024,000 Ordinary Shares are expected to be admitted to ASX and the full number of the Placement shares admitted to AIM on 18 June 2019.

Total Voting Rights

For the purposes of the Financial Conduct Authority’s Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules (DTRs), following issue of the 25,476,000 Ordinary Shares, the Company will have 232,496,581 Ordinary Shares in issue with voting rights attached. The Company holds no shares in treasury. This figure of 232,496,581 may be used by shareholders in the Company as the denominator for the calculations by which they will determine if they are required to notify their interest in, or a change to their interest in the Company, under the ASX Listing Rules or the DTRs.

 

For further information please visit www.so4.com.au or contact:

Tony Swiericzuk / Clint McGhie

Salt Lake Potash Limited

Tel: +61 8 6559 5800

Jo Battershill

Salt Lake Potash Limited

Tel: +44 7540 366000

Colin Aaronson / Richard Tonthat / Ben Roberts

Grant Thornton UK LLP

(Nominated Adviser)

Tel: +44 (0) 20 7383 5100

Derrick Lee / Beth McKiernan

Cenkos Securities plc (Joint Broker)

Tel: +44 (0) 131 220 6939

Rupert Fane / Ingo Hofmaier / Ernest Bell

Hannam & Partners (Joint Broker)

Tel: +44 (0) 20 7907 8500

 

Important Information 

Rule 2.7, 3.10.3, 3.10.4, 3.10.5

Appendix 3B

New issue announcement, application for quotation of additional securities and agreement

Information or documents not available now must be given to ASX as soon as available.  Information and documents given to ASX become ASX’s property and may be made public.

Introduced 01/07/96  Origin: Appendix 5  Amended 01/07/98, 01/09/99, 01/07/00, 30/09/01, 11/03/02, 01/01/03, 24/10/05, 01/08/12, 04/03/13

Name of entity

 SALT LAKE POTASH LIMITED

ABN

 98 117 085 748

We (the entity) give ASX the following information.

Part 1 ‑ All issues

You must complete the relevant sections (attach sheets if there is not enough space).

1

+Class of +securities issued or to be issued

Ordinary Shares

2

Number of +securities issued or to be issued (if known) or maximum number which may be issued

25,476,000

3

Principal terms of the +securities (e.g. if options, exercise price and expiry date; if partly paid +securities, the amount outstanding and due dates for payment; if +convertible securities, the conversion price and dates for conversion)

Fully paid ordinary shares

 

4

Do the +securities rank equally in all respects from the +issue date with an existing +class of quoted +securities?

If the additional +securities do not rank equally, please state:

·    the date from which they do

·    the extent to which they participate for the next dividend, (in the case of a trust, distribution) or interest payment

·    the extent to which they do not rank equally, other than in relation to the next dividend, distribution or interest payment

Yes

 

5

Issue price or consideration

$0.54

6

Purpose of the issue

(If issued as consideration for the acquisition of assets, clearly identify those assets)

Proceeds from the issue will be used to fund ongoing construction of the Lake Way Project, including the development of on-lake infrastructure, the payment of deposits on certain process plant long-lead items, completion of feasibility studies, and general working capital. 

6a

Is the entity an +eligible entity that has obtained security holder approval under rule 7.1A?

If Yes, complete sections 6b – 6h in relation to the+securities the subject of this Appendix 3B, and comply with section 6i

Yes

6b

The date the security holder resolution under rule 7.1A was passed

30 November 2018

6c

Number of +securities issued without security holder approval under rule 7.1

4,822,231

 

6d

Number of +securities issued with security holder approval under rule 7.1A

20,653,769

6e

Number of +securities issued with security holder approval under rule 7.3, or another specific security holder approval (specify date of meeting)

Nil

 

6f

Number of +securities issued under an exception in rule 7.2

Nil

6g

If +securities issued under rule 7.1A, was issue price at least 75% of 15 day VWAP as calculated under rule 7.1A.3?  Include the +issue date and both values.  Include the source of the VWAP calculation.

Yes

 

Issue date: 14 June 2019

Issue price: $0.54

15 day VWAP: $0.6144

 

 

6h

If +securities were issued under rule 7.1A for non-cash consideration, state date on which valuation of consideration was released to ASX Market Announcements

Not Applicable

6i

Calculate the entity’s remaining issue capacity under rule 7.1 and rule 7.1A – complete Annexure 1 and release to ASX Market Announcements

7.1 – 11,201,537

7.1A – Nil

 

7

+Issue dates

Note: The issue date may be prescribed by ASX (refer to the definition of issue date in rule 19.12).  For example, the issue date for a pro rata entitlement issue must comply with the applicable timetable in Appendix 7A.

Cross reference: item 33 of Appendix 3B.

14 June 2019

Number

+Class

8

Number and +class of all +securities quoted on ASX (including the +securities in section 2 if applicable)

232,496,581

Ordinary Shares

Number

+Class

9

Number and +class of all +securities not quoted on ASX (including the +securities in section 2 if applicable)

 

 

 

7,500,000

 

10,000,000

 

750,000

 

 

1,000,000

 

 

250,000

 

 

500,000

 

 

750,000

 

 

400,000

 

 

1,700,000

 

 

 

2,750,000

 

 

 

3,000,000

 

 

 

21,095,016

 

Class B Performance Shares

 

Class C Performance Shares

 

Incentive Options exercise price $0.50, expiry date 29 April 2020

 

Incentive Options exercise price $0.60, expiry date 29 April 2021

 

Incentive Options exercise price $0.40, expiry date 30 June 2021

 

Incentive Options exercise price $0.50, expiry date 30 June 2021

 

Incentive Options exercise price $0.60, expiry date 30 June 2021

 

Incentive Options exercise price $0.70, expiry date 30 June 2021

 

Incentive Options exercise price $0.60, expiry date 1 November 2023

 

Incentive Options exercise price $1.00, expiry date 1 November 2023

 

Incentive Options exercise price $1.20, expiry date 1 November 2023

 

Performance rights which are subject to various performance conditions to be satisfied prior to the relevant expiry dates between 31 December 2018 and 1 November 2023

10

Dividend policy (in the case of a trust, distribution policy) on the increased capital (interests)

Not Applicable

Part 2 ‑ Pro rata issue

11

Is security holder approval required?

Not Applicable

12

Is the issue renounceable or non-renounceable?

Not Applicable

13

Ratio in which the +securities will be offered

Not Applicable

14

+Class of +securities to which the offer relates

Not Applicable

15

+Record date to determine entitlements

Not Applicable

 

16

Will holdings on different registers (or subregisters) be aggregated for calculating entitlements?

Not Applicable

17

Policy for deciding entitlements in relation to fractions

Not Applicable

18

Names of countries in which the entity has security holders who will not be sent new offer documents

Note: Security holders must be told how their entitlements are to be dealt with.

Cross reference: rule 7.7.

Not Applicable

19

Closing date for receipt of acceptances or renunciations

Not Applicable

 

20

Names of any underwriters

Not Applicable

21

Amount of any underwriting fee or commission

Not Applicable

22

Names of any brokers to the issue

Not Applicable

23

Fee or commission payable to the broker to the issue

Not Applicable

24

Amount of any handling fee payable to brokers who lodge acceptances or renunciations on behalf of security holders

Not Applicable

25

If the issue is contingent on security holders’ approval, the date of the meeting

Not Applicable

26

Date entitlement and acceptance form and offer documents will be sent to persons entitled

Not Applicable

27

If the entity has issued options, and the terms entitle option holders to participate on exercise, the date on which notices will be sent to option holders

Not Applicable

28

Date rights trading will begin (if applicable)

Not Applicable

29

Date rights trading will end (if applicable)

Not Applicable

30

How do security holders sell their entitlements in full through a broker?

Not Applicable

31

How do security holders sell part of their entitlements through a broker and accept for the balance?

Not Applicable

32

How do security holders dispose of their entitlements (except by sale through a broker)?

Not Applicable

33

+Issue date

Not Applicable

Part 3 ‑ Quotation of securities

You need only complete this section if you are applying for quotation of securities

34

Type of +securities

(tick one)

(a)

+Securities described in Part 1

(b)

All other +securities

Example: restricted securities at the end of the escrowed period, partly paid securities that become fully paid, employee incentive share securities when restriction ends, securities issued on expiry or conversion of convertible securities

 

Entities that have ticked box 34(a)

Additional securities forming a new class of securities

Tick to indicate you are providing the information or documents

35

If the +securities are +equity securities, the names of the 20 largest holders of the additional +securities, and the number and percentage of additional +securities held by those holders

36

If the +securities are +equity securities, a distribution schedule of the additional +securities setting out the number of holders in the categories

1 – 1,000

1,001 – 5,000

5,001 – 10,000

10,001 – 100,000

100,001 and over

37

A copy of any trust deed for the additional +securities

 Entities that have ticked box 34(b) 

38

Number of +securities for which +quotation is sought

Not Applicable

39

+Class of +securities for which quotation is sought

Not Applicable

40

Do the +securities rank equally in all respects from the +issue date with an existing +class of quoted +securities?

If the additional +securities do not rank equally, please state:

·    the date from which they do

·    the extent to which they participate for the next dividend, (in the case of a trust, distribution) or interest payment

·    the extent to which they do not rank equally, other than in relation to the next dividend, distribution or interest payment

Not Applicable

41

Reason for request for quotation now

Example: In the case of restricted securities, end of restriction period

(if issued upon conversion of another +security, clearly identify that other +security)

Not Applicable

Number

+Class

42

Number and +class of all +securities quoted on ASX (including the +securities in clause 38)

  

Quotation agreement

1           +Quotation of our additional +securities is in ASX’s absolute discretion.  ASX may quote the +securities on any conditions it decides. 

2          We warrant the following to ASX.

·          The issue of the +securities to be quoted complies with the law and is not for an illegal purpose.

·          There is no reason why those +securities should not be granted +quotation.

·          An offer of the +securities for sale within 12 months after their issue will not require disclosure under section 707(3) or section 1012C(6) of the Corporations Act.

Note: An entity may need to obtain appropriate warranties from subscribers for the securities in order to be able to give this warranty

·          Section 724 or section 1016E of the Corporations Act does not apply to any applications received by us in relation to any +securities to be quoted and that no-one has any right to return any +securities to be quoted under sections 737, 738 or 1016F of the Corporations Act at the time that we request that the +securities be quoted.

·          If we are a trust, we warrant that no person has the right to return the +securities to be quoted under section 1019B of the Corporations Act at the time that we request that the +securities be quoted.

3          We will indemnify ASX to the fullest extent permitted by law in respect of any claim, action or expense arising from or connected with any breach of the warranties in this agreement.

4          We give ASX the information and documents required by this form.  If any information or document is not available now, we will give it to ASX before +quotation of the +securities begins.  We acknowledge that ASX is relying on the information and documents.  We warrant that they are (will be) true and complete.

Sign here:            …………………………………………………..            Date: 14 June 2019

                             (Director/Company secretary)

Print name:         Clint McGhie

== == == == ==

Notice Under Section 708A

Salt Lake Potash Limited (the Company) has today issued 25,476,000 fully paid ordinary shares. The issued shares are part of a class of securities quoted on Australian Securities Exchange (“ASX”). 

The Company hereby notifies ASX under paragraph 708A(5)(e) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cwth) (the “Act”) that:

1.            the Company issued the securities without disclosure to investors under Part 6D.2 of the Act;

2.            as at the date of this notice, the Company has complied with the provisions of Chapter 2M of the Corporations Act as they apply to the Company, and section 674 of the Act; and

3.            as at the date of this notice, there is no information that is “excluded information” within the meaning of sections 708A(7) and (8) of the Act.

Salt Lake Potash (SO4) Exceptional Economics of Commercial Scale Development and Lake Way

Salt Lake Potash Limited (Salt Lake Potash or Company) is pleased to report the results of the Company’s Scoping Study for a commercial scale Sulphate of Potash (SOP) development at Lake Way (Lake Way Project or Project) in Western Australia.

Based on the Scoping Study results, the Project generates exceptional economic returns due to its low capital intensity, bottom quartile operating costs and sustainable operating life.

Cautionary Statement

The Scoping Study referred to in this announcement has been undertaken to determine the potential viability of a Sulphate of Potash (SOP) development at the Lake Way Project. The Scoping Study has been prepared to an accuracy level of ±30%. The results should not be considered a profit forecast or production forecast.

The Scoping Study is a preliminary technical and economic study of the potential viability of the Lake Way Project. In accordance with the ASX Listing Rules, the Company advises it is based on low-level technical and economic assessments that are not sufficient to support the estimation of ore reserves. Further evaluation work including infill drilling and appropriate studies are required before Salt Lake Potash will be able to estimate any ore reserves or to provide any assurance of an economic development case.

Approximately 80% of the total production target is in the Measured resource category, 16% in the Indicated resource category and 4% is in the Inferred resource category. The Inferred resource included in the total production target is located at the southern end of Lake Way and is expected to be the last of the brine extraction system constructed. It does not feature as a significant portion of production either during the payback period or during the life of mine. Accordingly, the Company has concluded that it has reasonable grounds for disclosing a production target which includes a small amount of Inferred material. However, there is a low level of geological confidence associated with Inferred mineral resources and there is no certainty that further exploration work will result in the determination of Indicated mineral resources or that the production target itself will be realised.

The Scoping Study is based on the material assumptions outlined elsewhere in this announcement. These include assumptions about the availability of funding. While Salt Lake Potash considers all the material assumptions to be based on reasonable grounds, there is no certainty that they will prove to be correct or that the range of outcomes indicated by the Scoping Study will be achieved.

To achieve the range outcomes indicated in the Scoping Study, additional funding will likely be required. Investors should note that there is no certainty that Salt Lake Potash will be able to raise funding when needed. It is also possible that such funding may only be available on terms that dilute or otherwise affect the value of the Salt Lake Potash’s existing shares. It is also possible that Salt Lake Potash could pursue other ‘value realisation’ strategies such as sale, partial sale, or joint venture of the Project. If it does, this could materially reduce Salt Lake Potash’s proportionate ownership of the Project.

The Company has concluded it has a reasonable basis for providing the forward looking statements included in this announcement and believes that it has a reasonable basis to expect it will be able to fund the development of the Project. Given the uncertainties involved, investors should not make any investment decisions based solely on the results of the Scoping Study.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Salt Lake Potash is pleased to report the results of the Scoping Study for the commercial scale development of its SOP project at Lake Way. The Scoping Study demonstrates the potential for the Lake Way Project to support a low capital and operating cost operation with annual production of approximately 200,000 tonne of premium grade SOP.

The Scoping Study demonstrates the compelling economics of the commercial scale development of Lake Way with the ability to support a long mine life:

  • Lake Way Project to produce an estimated 200,000 tonnes per year of premium grade SOP (>52% K2O)
  • High-grade SOP resource underpins long Mine Life of 20 years
  • Lowest operating cost for global SOP producers with an FOB operating cost estimate of $264/t (US$185/t)
  • Low development capital requirements of approximately A$237m (US$166m) including a growth allowance of ~13% ($32m) supported by the close proximity to infrastructure
  • Exceptional economics with estimated project post-tax NPV8 of A$381m (pre-tax NPV8 of A$580m) and post-tax IRR of 27% (pre-tax IRR 33%)
  • Steady state EBITDA of A$90m annually and average annual after tax cashflow of A$64m
  • Strong cashflow and low capital cost result in early payback period of 3.2 years
  • Construction underway on the first phase of Evaporation Ponds (the Williamson Ponds) which will support the dewatering of the Williamson Pit’s super saturated brine with an SOP grade of 25kg/m3
  • Plant commissioning expected Q4 2020 utilising salts from the Williamson Pit brine
  • BFS currently underway with completion expected in Q3 2019 to support project financing

Salt Lake Potash has already significantly de-risked the commercial scale project through the early construction works on the first phase of the Evaporation Ponds (the Williamson Ponds). The de-watering of the Williamson Pit and commencement of evaporation will provide additional insight into the critical evaporation processes which in turn will further de-risk the project.

Lowest Operating Costs

The results of the study demonstrate the potential for very low operating costs. It is estimated that the Lake Way Project will have the lowest operating costs of any SOP operation globally with an FOB operating cost of $264/t (US$185/t).

Short Payback period

The low development capital requirements and significant margins received for the Lake Way Project provides a short payback period of just 3.2 years from first production. This will result in full repayment of development capital by 2024.

KCl Addition Opportunity

The resource at Lake Way contains a significant excess of sulphate (SO4) which provides the opportunity for the Company to explore value adding measures including a potassium chloride (KCl) reaction phase to the processing stage. Preliminary work has shown significant benefits to the Lake Way Project through the inclusion of the KCl reaction phase in the process, including a potential increase in annual production of SOP and subsequent improvements in financial returns to shareholders. The Company will explore this opportunity as part of the BFS for the Lake Way Project.

Robust Economics

The Study demonstrates that the Lake Way Project provides exceptional economics even under the most extreme downside pricing scenarios. The breakeven pricing scenario is a significant 40+% decrease in price at US$323/t.

Table 1: Pricing Scenarios

SOP Price

Breakeven

US$323/t

US$400/t

US$450/t

US$500/t

Base

US$550/t

US$600/t

US$650/t

NPV
(post tax)

A$130m

A$214m

A$298m

A$381m

A$465m

A$548m

Project Funding Advanced

On 6 June 2019, the Company announced that it had received binding commitments for a placement to raise A$20.25m from strategic investors.

In addition, the Company is in advanced discussions with a debt provider for a debt funding package which will support funding for the Lake Way Project.

Next Steps

Having completed the successful Scoping Study, Salt Lake Potash has subsequently commenced a Bankable Feasibility Study (BFS) targeted for completion in Q3 2019. The Company has appointed GR Engineering Services Limited (GRES, ASX:GNG) as lead engineer for the BFS. GRES will work with a number of industry experts including Wood Saskatoon.

The BFS will include the following:

  • Further drilling and trenching programs to increase resource definition and confidence levels for the Lake Way Resource including lake playa and paleochannel
  • Additional test work at Saskatchewan Research Council (SRC) on the process flow sheet, including completion of two pilot plant test runs
  • Review KCl opportunity and determine the options for the possible inclusion of a KCl reaction within the SOP Plant Process
  • Refinement of logistics solution and identification of preferred constructors
  • Update the trench hydraulic analysis and optimisation of trench design in partnership with Cardno
  • Incorporate findings from the first phase of Evaporation Pond construction into the design and construction methodology for the commercial scale project
  • On-going design and refinement of the Process Plant including partnering with vendors for major equipment including crystallisers to conduct testwork relevant to their equipment

SCOPING STUDY RESULTS

The Scoping Study is based on the Mineral Resource Estimate for the Lake Way Project reported in March 2019, comprising 8.2Mt of SOP calculated using Drainable Porosity (73 million tonnes of SOP using Total Porosity).

The Scoping Study assumes a mine life of 20 years with plant commissioning in Q4 2020. The study mine plan, comprising a network of trenches and paleochannel bores, provides for a 200,000tpa production run rate. Table 2 provides a summary of production and cost figures for the Project.

Table 2: Lake Way Project Overview

Lake Way Project

Unit

Estimated Value

PHYSICAL

Mine life

years

20

Annual Production of SOP

tpa

200,000

Mineral Mine Plan

Measured Resource (Lake Way Playa)1.8Mt @ 15.2kg/m3 SOP

%

80

Indicated Resource (Paleochannel) 1.4Mt @ 13.6kg/m3 SOP

%

16

Inferred Resource (Lake Way Playa & Paleovalley) 5Mt @ 15.2kg/m3 SOP

%

4

MINING METHOD

Trenches (production and transport) – average depth 5m

km

130

Bores – average depth 120m

number

14

Brine Chemistry (average Lake Brine SOP grade)

Kg/m3

15.2

EVAPORATION PONDS

Area

ha

1,325

Halite Ponds

ha

1,020

Harvest Ponds

ha

291

Recovery of Potassium from feed brine

%

78

PLANT

Operating time

hpa

7,600

Recovery of Potassium from feed salt

%

80

OPERATING AND CAPITAL COSTS

LOM Cash Operating Costs FOB ex-Geraldton port

A$/t

$264

Mine Gate Operating Costs

A$/t

$184

Transport and handling

A$/t

$80

Capital Costs

A$m

$237

Direct Costs

A$m

$177

Indirect Costs & Growth

A$m

$60

FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE – LIFE OF PROJECT

Price (FOB)

US$/t

$550

Exchange Rate

US$/AUD

0.70

Discount Rate

%

8

EBITDA

A$m

$90

Average Annual after-tax cash flow

A$m

$64

Post tax Internal Rate of Return (IRR)

%

27

Post tax Net Present Value (NPV) @ 8% discount rate

A$m

$381

Pre-tax Internal Rate of Return (IRR)

%

33

Pre-tax Net Present Value (NPV) @ 8% discount rate

A$m

$580

PROJECT OVERVIEW

Lake Way is located in the Northern Goldfields Region of Western Australia, less than 15km south of Wiluna. The surface area of the Lake is over 270km2.

Salt Lake Potash holds five Exploration Licences (two granted and three under application) covering most of Lake Way and select areas off-lake, including the paleochannel defined by previous exploration. The northern end of the Lake is largely covered by a number of Mining Leases, held by Blackham Resources Limited (Blackham Resources), the owner of the Wiluna Gold Mine.

In April 2019, the Company entered into a binding Split Commodity and Access Agreement (Access Agreement) with Blackham Resources in relation to the development of the Lake Way Project on terms in line with the previously executed MOU announced on 12 March 2018.

Lake Way has a number of compelling advantages which make it an ideal site for Salt Lake Potash’s initial SOP operation, including:

  • Access to Blackham Resources’ existing infrastructure (including camps, power and maintenance) to accelerate development.
  • The site has excellent freight solutions, being adjacent to the Goldfields Highway, which is permitted for heavy haulage, quad trailer road trains to the railhead at Leonora and then direct rail access to both Esperance and Fremantle Ports, or via other heavy haulage roads to Geraldton Port.
  • The Goldfields Gas Pipeline is adjacent to Salt Lake Potash’s tenements, running past the eastern side of the Lake.
  • Access to Blackham Resources’ existing Mining Leases provides advanced permitting pathway for early development activity, including the construction of the first phase of Evaporation Ponds (the Williamson Ponds).
  • Salt Lake Potash is constructing the first phase of the Evaporation Ponds to enable the Company to commence dewatering from the existing Williamson Pit. The pit contains an estimated 1.2GL of brine at the exceptional grade of 25kg/m3 of SOP. This brine is the ideal starter feed for evaporation ponds, having already evaporated from the normal Lake Way brine grade, which averages over 15kg/m3.
  • The high grade brines at Lake Way will result in lower capital and operating costs due to lower extraction and evaporation requirements.
  • The presence of clays in the upper levels of the lake which are amenable to low cost, on-lake evaporation pond construction.

SCOPING STUDY CONSULTANTS

The Scoping Study was managed by Wood (formerly Amec Foster Wheeler) and is based on information and assumptions provided by a range of leading independent consultants, including the following consultants who have contributed to key components of the Scoping Study.

Table 3: Lake Way Project Scoping Study Consultants

Area

Responsibility

Study Manager

Wood

Resource Estimate

Groundwater Science

Brine Evaporation

Ad-Infinitum/ Knight Piesold

Brine Transfer Hydraulics 

Cardno

Process Plant:

–     Design basis/criteria

–     Process Test Work

–     Process Plant Design

 

Carlos Perucca Process Consulting

Saskatchewan Research Council

Wood

Plant Infrastructure

Wood

Area Infrastructure

Wood/Salt Lake Potash

Environmental & Heritage

Pendragon Environmental Solutions

Capital Estimate Compilation

Wood

Operating Estimate Compilation (Mine Gate)

Wood

Marketing

CRU International/Argus Media

Economics

Salt Lake Potash

PROJECT GEOLOGY AND MINERAL RESOURCE

Geological Setting

Lake Way is in the Northern Goldfields Province on the Archaean Yilgarn Craton. The province is characterised by granite-greenstone rocks that exhibit a prominent northwest tectonic trend and low to medium-grade metamorphism. The Archaean rocks are intruded by east-west dolerite dykes of Proterozoic age, and in the eastern area there are small, flat-lying outliers of Proterozoic and Permian sedimentary rocks. The basement rocks are generally poorly exposed owing to low relief, extensive superficial cover, and widespread deep weathering.

A key characteristic of the goldfields is the occurrence of paleochannel aquifers. These palaeodrainages are incised into the Archean basement and in-filled with a mixed Tertiary and Quaternary sedimentary sequence.

The paleochannel sediments of Lake Way are characterised by a mixed sedimentary sequence including sand, silts and clays of lacustrine, aeolian, fluvial and colluvial depositional origins. These near-surface deposits also include chemically-derived sediments of calcrete, silcrete and ferricrete. Beneath eastern parts of the playa, there is a deep paleochannel that is infilled with Tertiary-aged palaeochannel clay and basal sands in the deepest portion.

The Sediments infilling the paleochannel are described below:

Lake Bed Sediment

Recent (Cainozoic), unconsolidated silt, sand and clay sediment containing variable abundance of evaporite minerals, particularly gypsum. The unit is ubiquitous across the salt lake surface. The thickness of the unit ranges from approximately 3 to 20m.

The upper part of the unit comprises unconsolidated, gypsiferous sand and silt from surface to around 1.5m depth. The unit is widespread, homogeneous and continuous with the thickest parts in the centre and southern portion of the lake. This is underlain by well sorted, lacustrine silt and clay.

Palaeovalley Sediment

The Paleovalley sediment consists of Tertiary clay and silt that overlies basement or the Basal Sand.

Paleochannel Basal Sand

Tertiary, unconsolidated fine, medium to coarse grained sand interbedded with silt, clay and some lignite horizons.

Mineral Resource

The Mineral Resource Estimate underpinning the production target, classified as Measured, Indicated and Inferred, was prepared by a competent person and was reported in accordance with the JORC Code (2012 Edition) on 18 March 2019.

The Company engaged an independent hydrogeological consultant with substantial salt lake brine expertise, Groundwater Science Pty Ltd, to complete the Mineral Resource Estimate for the Lake Way Project.

The Lake Way Mineral Resource Estimate describes a brine hosted resource. The minerals are dissolved in brine, and the brine is contained within pore spaces of the host sediment.

The Mineral Resource Estimate of 73Mt of SOP calculated using Total Porosity and 8.2Mt of SOP calculated using Drainable Porosity is hosted within approximately 15 billion cubic metres of sediment ranging in thickness from a few metres to over 100m, beneath 189km2 of playa lake surface including the paleochannel basal sand unit of 20m thickness and 30km length.

The Mineral Resource Estimate for Lake Way is divided into resource classifications that are controlled by the host geological units:

  • Lake Bed Sediment
  • Paleovalley Sediment
  • Paleochannel Basal Sands

The mineral resource estimate is summarised in the Tables 4 – 6.

The estimated SOP tonnage represents the SOP within the in-situ contained brine with no recovery factor applied. The amount of contained brine which can be extracted depends on many factors including the permeability of the sediments, the drainable porosity, and the recharge dynamics of the aquifers.

Brines by their nature are not a static resource as they are subject to groundwater movement, dilution and concentration over time. Reporting both total and drainable porosity allows the reflection of this dynamic resource environment, including the consideration of the recharge and physical diffusion impacts on the mine plan and production output.

The impact of the recharge and physical diffusion in the development and long term abstraction of a brine resource is discussed in subsequent sections.

Table 4: Measured Resource

Total Volume

Brine Concentration

Mineral Tonnage Calculated from Total Porosity

Mineral Tonnage Calculated from Drainable Porosity

K

Mg

So4

Total Porosity

Brine Volume

SOP Tonnage

Drainable Porosity1

Brine Volume

SOP Tonnage

(Mm3)

(kg/m3)

(kg/m3)

(Kg/m3)

%

(Mm3)

(Mt)

%

(Mm3)

(Mt)

North Lakebed

(0.4-8.0 m)

1,060

6.8

8.0

27.6

43

456

6.9

11

117

1.8

Williamson Pit

1.26

11.4

14.7

48.0

1.26

0.03

Total

6.9

1.83

Table 5: Indicated Resource

Total Volume

Brine Concentration

Mineral Tonnage Calculated from Total Porosity

Mineral Tonnage Calculated from Drainable Porosity

K

Mg

So4

Brine Volume

SOP Tonnage

Brine Volume

SOP Tonnage

(Mm3)

(kg/m3)

(kg/m3)

(Kg/m3)

(Mm3)

(Mt)

(Mm3)

(Mt)

Basal Sands

(Paleochannel)

686

6.1

8.2

25.0

40

274

3.7

15

103

1.4

Table 6: Inferred Resource

Total Volume

Brine Concentration

Mineral Tonnage Calculated from Total Porosity

Mineral Tonnage Calculated from Drainable Porosity

K

Mg

So4

Total Porosity

Brine Volume

SOP Tonnage

Drainable Porosity

Brine Volume

SOP Tonnage

(Mm3)

(kg/m3)

(kg/m3)

(Kg/m3)

%

(Mm3)

(Mt)

%

(Mm3)

(Mt)

South Lakebed

(0.4-8.0 m)

316

6.8

8.0

27.6

43

135

2.0

11

35

0.5

Lakebed

(8m to Base)

9,900

6.8

8.0

27.6

40

3,960

60.0

3

297

4.5

Total

62.0

5.0

1 The Drainable Porosity does not include the significant resource potentially available through the recharge cycle.

Mineral Brine Resource Cycle

The production of brine within the lakebed sediment is cyclic and described below.

Stage 1 – Initial Resource

The initial brine resource comprises of two distinct porosity categories:

  • Brine dissolved in water held in Drainable Porosity, (11% of the total aquifer volume).
  • Brine dissolved in water held in Retained Porosity, (32% of total aquifer volume).

The combined porosity (Total Porosity) then comprises the total SOP brine resource held in the Lake Bed Sediments aquifer.

The remaining volume is occupied by solid material (sand, silt and clay grains comprising approximately 57% of the aquifer volume).

Stage 2 – Production Cycle

During production the brine drains under gravity toward the trench and is subsequently removed by pumping. This creates a hydraulic gradient toward the trench and brine is drawn some distance through the aquifer toward the trench (typically hundreds of meters depending on aquifer permeability).

Over time the aquifer immediately surrounding the trench is partially dewatered. This means that the drainable brine has been removed from the sediment, but the retained brine is still held in place by surface tension.

Stage 3 – Recharge Cycle

Western Australian Salt Lake playas receive water supply from both direct rainfall and surface run-off annually. Direct rainfall lands on the playa each year, and most years, heavy, cyclonic rain events cause run-off from the surrounding catchment onto the lake playa. This water infiltrates the lake playa surface and re-fills the drainable pores in the aquifer. The larger rainfall events usually occur from January through to March.

Stage 4 – Mixing Cycle

The water that has infiltrated and refilled the drainable porosity then mixes (by physical diffusion) with the brine held in retained porosity.

Through repeated production cycles the total brine resource is mined. The concentration of brine pumped from the production trenches will decline over time as the total resource is depleted over repeated production cycles.

The pumping rate is controlled by the hydraulic conductivity of the host sediment. The concentration of produced brine will change over time and will be controlled by the tonnage contained in total porosity and the mechanism of mixing between repeated production cycles.

MINING AND PRODUCTION TARGET

The estimated production target of 200,000tpa of SOP is supported by the total brine production volume of 23GL/year. A numerical groundwater model was developed to predict water level drawdowns due to brine production from trenches in the superficial lake sediments at Lake Way. The model simulates brine abstraction of 19.3GL/year from a trench network. This is supplemented by an assumed volume of 3.7GL/year of brine from the paleochannel delivering a total brine volume of 23GL/year sufficient to support the production target of 200,000tpa of SOP.

Recharge is a key element of the mining strategy, as it refills the drainable porosity and activates salts contained within the retained porosity by physical diffusion. Direct rainfall recharge has been estimated from water level fluctuations due to rainfall and specific yield (Groundwater Science, 2017). Evaporation from water ponded in the Lake was set to 0.7 x (pan evaporation).

Recharge calculations used in the abstraction model were based on historic (1971 – 1990) precipitation at Wiluna and estimated surface inflows (Groundwater Science, 2018) into the lake for a 20-year production period.

Over the life of mine, 80% of the total brine production volume is sourced from the Measured Mineral Resource (Lake Bed Sediment), 16% from the Indicated Mineral Resource (Paleochannel) and 4% from the Inferred Mineral Resource (Lake Bed Sediment – South). The trenches for abstraction of the Inferred component of brine production is expected to be the last of the brine extraction system constructed. Whilst the Company has a reasonable expectation that the portion of the Inferred Mineral Resource included in total brine production will be capable of upgrade, it does not feature as a significant portion of production either during the payback period or during the life of mine.

Brine Extraction

The brine extraction methodology and requirements for the Scoping Study are supported by hydrogeological modelling and hydraulic design work undertaken by Cardno Engineering.

The Scoping Study has assumed brine will be extracted from Lake Way using two methods:

  • Surface trenching provides access to brine contained within the playa lake sediments;
  • Vertical bores provide access to brine from the paleochannel aquifer.

The design requirements assumed an average brine demand of 730L/s to be supplied to the halite ponds for the extraction network concept design. The contribution to brine production is approximately 84% from trenching and 16% from bores. The current basis is:

  • Bore production rate of 8.4L/s/bore
  • Trench yield rate (flow) minimum of 4L/s/km
  • Trench yield rate (flow) maximum of 8L/s/km

The hydraulic analysis used a conceptual brine extraction network layout and the proposed evaporation pond locations to determine the likely requirements of the on-lake brine transfer pumping scheme.

Brine extracted from paleochannel bores will be fed directly into nearby trenches. Bore pumps have been sized for a flowrate of approximately 8L/s and a pumping head at 90m.

The location and geometry of the paleochannel has been identified from a passive seismic survey. Bores will be drilled using the mud rotary method through the lake bed sediments and the Tertiary clays into the basal sand terminating in the weathered bedrock horizon.

The bores will be screened across the basal sands section. Gravel pack will be installed across the screened section with a bentonite seal at the top, the annulus will be backfilled to surface.

Trench Layout

The trench network designed as part of the Scoping Study stretches a total of 130km across the lake surface and includes two types of trench systems required to maintain the feed brine into the Halite Ponds:

·    Extraction trenches provide a low pressure zone for brine contained in the surrounding playa lake sediments to drain into.

·    Transport trenches to convey brine into distinct areas as required, and capture brine pumped from the paleochannel bores into the trench network.

Trench Flow

The brine extraction pumping systems must provide sufficient brine to meet seasonal pond demand, which is at a peak during the summer months due to solar evaporation.

A hydraulic analysis was undertaken on a conceptual network layout to calculate flowrates, flow velocities, pump requirements and power demand. Typical industry norms for pumped open channels were adopted, maintaining a minimal trench base gradient of 1:5000 and a maximum flow velocity of 0.3m/s.

Pump stations are located on-lake between trench segments, and at entry points into each halite pond. In total, the trench network includes 12 transfer pump stations.

Trench Design

The trench design provides for approximately a 5m wide trench, with additional width to batter back any surficial loose soils, and from 5m to 6m deep. The trenches will likely be stepped to avoid wall collapse and to assist with constructability. The Scoping Study has assumed a construction methodology using an amphibious excavator.

Trench spoil will be used to create a light vehicle access berm on one side of the trench and include windrows if required. Bunding on the opposite side will be designed with gaps to allow surface water recharge.

The height and layout of the bunds will depend on hydrogeology requirements (i) to ensure regular groundwater recharge from surface water and (ii) to maintain surface water flow of the lake.

Regular trench maintenance will be required and allowance is made in the maintenance equipment fleet for purchase of excavators and constant coverage of personnel on-site to maintain the trench network.

BRINE EVAPORATION

Extracted brine is concentrated in a series of solar ponds to induce the sequential precipitation of salts and eventually potassium-containing salts in the harvest ponds. Based on modelling using historical data obtained from nearby weather stations at Wiluna Township and Wiluna Airport, the Lake Way region in Western Australia has an average rainfall of 260mm/a and an average water evaporation rate of 3,504mm/a, making conditions ideal for evaporation processes.

The operational area of the evaporation ponds required for the final 200,000tpa SOP production rate is 13.08km2, with area distribution between the various ponds based on mass balance modelling output.

The pond sizing is developed from a simulation using a combination of mathematical and thermodynamic models and is based on the average brine chemistry from the lake and paleochannel. The simulation uses average annual weather conditions to calculate the required brine flow and pond area (size) to meet the targeted 200,000tpa production scenario.

Salt Lake Potash engaged Ad-Infinitum to conduct meteorological modelling, evaporation modelling, pond sizing and design for the Lake Way Project. Geotechnical consulting services were provided by Knight Piésold.

Evaporation Pond Chemistry and Configuration

Brine evaporite chemistry is very complex due to the multitude of ions present in brine, however, in an effort to simplify the evaporation pathway representation, a three-component system of the major constituents (Mg-SO4-K) is commonly assumed. Sodium and chloride ions are not shown, for simplicity, as they are generally present in abundance in all salt lake brines and form halite in preference to all other salts.

The extraction brine composition used for the Scoping Study evaporation modelling is based on Lake Way sample data and is detailed below. The average brine composition below is based on an assumed 80% brine extracted from the lake playa and 20% brine extracted from the Paleochannel.

Table 7: Brine Extraction Composition

Element

Unit

Value

Na

g/L

74.3

K

g/L

6.5

Mg

g/L

7.4

Ca

g/L

0.5

SO4

g/L

26.7

Cl

g/L

122.8

 

Experience from numerous evaporation trials for Lake Way and Lake Wells has shown that astrakanite does not form, most likely because the kinetics of the formation are too slow for a dynamic pond system. Accordingly, the Scoping Study process has adopted this view and assumed that astrakanite will not form within the pond system. Instead, the composition of the solution will move directly towards the leonite-schoenite field to produce potassium sulphate salts, followed by the epsomite-kainite field where these salts precipitate. Finally, the carnallite field is reached.

Harvest salts from the kainite pond and carnallite pond are used for SOP production. Concentrated brine from the carnallite pond is sent to the bittern pond for additional concentration and store as a waste by-product.

Evaporation Pond Layout

The specific site conditions were reviewed to assess the most suitable evaporation pond locations:

  • Halite ponds (1020ha) are located on-lake, to make use of the in situ low permeability clays and avoid the need for HDPE lining.
  • Bitterns Pond (14ha) is located on-lake and unlined.
  • Kainite (200ha), Carnallite (11ha) and Recovery Ponds (80ha) are located on-lake.

On-Lake Ponds

All ponds are located on-lake providing significant benefits for both cost and operational efficiency. The on-lake evaporation pond system has been located to:

  • Avoid locating ponds in areas of high brine yield, to minimise pond footprints sterilising the available brine resource.
  • Where possible, avoid low lying areas subject to long periods of inundation resulting from surface water flow. Some ponds that span inundated areas will require specific design considerations.
  • Ensure availability of in situ clays beneath the pond footprint, proven to be of low permeability and will limit seepage of unlined ponds.
  • Ensure availability of good quality lake clays that are a potential source of embankment construction materials to allow a cut-to-fill method for pond construction.
  • Avoid disturbance of the lake edge due to environmental and heritage requirements.

The pond sizes are detailed in Table 8.

Table 8: On-lake Ponds

 

Halite

Bitterns

Kainite

Carnallite

Recovery

Area (ha)

1,020

14

200

11

80

Evaporation Pond Construction

On-lake construction requires specialist equipment given the challenges trafficking and placing fill on the soft lake surface. Construction material will either be clay sourced from borrow pits immediately adjacent to the embankments, or imported materials source from existing mining waste materials or planned mine pre-stripping.

The general construction methodology is currently being trialled and proven up as part of the first phase of the Evaporation Pond construction currently underway at Lake Way. This will provide important information to ensure an efficient construction methodology is implemented for the remaining pond construction operations at Lake Way.

Salt Harvesting

The harvest ponds have been designed to allow for up to 12 months of salt growth before harvest. Harvests may be made more frequently in the kainite ponds during plant start-up and operation. The carnallite and recovery ponds will also be harvested and salt processed through the plant.

Sulphate salts are to be recovered from the harvest ponds (kainite, carnallite and recovery) by grader and front end loader. Dump trucks are loaded to transport the salt to the process plant, where it is stockpiled in separate areas to allow for a blended feed to the process plant.

PROCESS PLANT

The potassium salts harvested from the solar evaporation ponds will be treated in a processing plant to convert these salts into sulphate of potash (SOP or K2SO4), while minimising deportment of chlorides to the product.

Salt Lake Potash has conducted extensive testing of lake brines and harvest salts from its salt lake projects, predominantly Lake Way and Lake Wells, in order to confirm the evaporation and associated harvested salt processing operations. The testing thus far has proven that lake brine can be concentrated economically, via solar evaporation, to produce mixed potassium sulphate double salts. It has also been shown that these salts, when harvested, can be economically converted into a valuable, high purity SOP fertiliser product.

The SOP production process consists of:

·    Attrition to break up crystals

·    Conversion of the mixed sulphate salts to schoenite in a sulphate solution at ambient temperatures

·    Reverse Flotation to remove chlorides

·    Conversion of the schoenite to SOP (in a schoenite solution at around 50°C)

·    Filtering, drying and packaging

The key design parameters are shown in Table 9.

Table 9: Design Basis

Parameter

Value

Flowsheet configuration

Feed preparation, conversion, reverse flotation and SOP crystallisation.

SOP production

200,000tpa

Process plant potassium recovery

80%

Operating Time

 

Brine extraction; evaporation ponds and harvesting

8200h/a

Process plant

7600h/a

Product Composition

 

SOP Grade

>96%

%K2O equivalent

>52%

Target Cl Content

<0.5%

Target Mg Content

<0.2%

The harvested salt is crushed in a roll mill to break up lump material and is further broken down and scrubbed in attritioning cells. The resulting slurry is pumped to the conversion circuit where the potassium harvest salts are converted to schoenite prior to flotation.

The conversion tanks’ discharge slurry is transferred to the conversion thickener, an inclined plate unit. The conversion thickener underflow slurry, now predominantly schoenite, reports to the reverse flotation circuit.

The converted harvest salts still contain an appreciable amount of halite which needs to be removed to minimise chloride and sodium reporting to the product. Therefore a reverse flotation configuration is used employing self-aspirated columns to remove the halite. The resulting halite slurry is filtered, then stockpiled for disposal back on the lake. The flotation product is a Schoenite slurry which is filtered, to remove excess flotation brine, and is presented to the crystalliser circuit. The filtered flotation brine, which is saturated in potassium, is internally recycled with any excess brine sent to the recovery pond.

The purified schoenite salt from flotation is re-slurried with a calculated amount of dilution water and then pumped into the SOP crystalliser which is maintained at 50°C to convert to the schoenite to SOP by dissolving the magnesium sulphate from the double salt. The SOP crystalliser mother liquor reports to a cooling crystalliser where schoenite is precipitated from the liquor by cooling the liquor to 20°C with a chiller system. The secondary schoenite produced by the cooling crystalliser is recycled to the SOP crystalliser along with the primary schoenite from flotation.

The SOP crystalliser produces fine SOP crystals which are first dewatered, then the SOP cake is dried in a rotary drier and then conveyed to the product storage shelter. Product is periodically reclaimed by an FEL and transferred into a loadout hopper for transportation to port.

MAJOR INFRASTRUCTURE

The Lake Way Project is located in the Goldfields region of Western Australia approximately 15km south of Wiluna. The Project is located in close proximity to the Goldfields Highway which is a state highway that extends 800km from south of Kambalda in the Goldfields to Meekatharra in the Mid-West. Given the proximity to the Goldfields Highway which supports quad road trains, road haulage options include either travelling south toward Leonora or west to Geraldton.

The process plant is located 5km from the evaporation ponds and connected by an existing haul road that services the Williamson Pit. A 1.4km haul road from the Williamson pit causeway to the Williamson pond has been constructed as part of the first phase of Evaporation Pond construction. Unsealed access roads will be required for access to the Goldfield Gas Pipeline, raw water borefield and paleochannel bores.

The Project power requirements will be provided by a standalone natural gas power station located near the process plant under a build, own, operate (BOO) arrangement and local diesel generators at remote locations. 

The Project requires natural gas for the power station and for process requirements such as the boiler. Natural gas will be supplied from the Goldfields Gas Pipeline which runs along the eastern side of Lake Way. The distance from the process plant to the gas pipeline is approximately 27km.

Water required for the Project will be sourced from a nearby borefield. Raw water will be extracted from the borefield by bore pumps. The total raw water requirement for the Project is 2.0GL/a.

A fly in/fly out (FIFO) workforce has been adopted for the Lake Way Project using the Wiluna Airport which is located 5km south of the main township. A permanent accommodation village with a capacity for 100 workers has been assumed. The village will be expanded to include 180 construction workers during the construction phase.

PRODUCT TRANSPORT AND LOGISTICS

Salt Lake Potash engaged several highly qualified transport logistic companies to assist with defining the optimal logistics solution for transportation of 200,000tpa of SOP from Lake Way to port. An assessment of numerous haulage options was undertaken, applying a fixed origin and modelling multiple potential destinations including Geraldton, Fremantle and Esperance. This assessment has included a road direct assessment, rail direct assessment, and intermodal hub and spoke solution incorporating both road and rail.

The road direct solution to Geraldton has been established as the most cost-effective option to use for the product transport logistics for the standalone 200,000tpa SOP project from Lake Way to underpin the overall economic assessment for the Scoping Study.

The relatively close proximity to the Geraldton Port facilities (780km) and the ability to leverage off the established sealed highway network from Lake Way to Geraldton provides cost effective access into the Geraldton port facility.

The transportation solution will consist of truck loading at Lake Way site via Front End Loader. The transport from Lake Way to Geraldton will be undertaken by trucks suitable for quad combinations. The Mainroads Restricted Access Vehicles (RAV) approvals for quad combination transport covers the entire route from Lake Way all the way into Geraldton Port.

Geraldton Port is capable of handling fully loaded Panamax size vessels up to 70,000 tonnes and 225m in length. The Port handles approximately 19 million tonnes per annum of trade per year with significant excess capacity available for handling and storage.

PRODUCT QUALITY AND MARKETING

Fertilisers consist of essential plant nutrients that are applied to farmed crops in order to achieve favourable quality and yield. They replace the nutrients that crops remove from the soil, thereby sustaining the quality of crops, and are considered the most effective means for growers to increase yields.

The key components of agricultural fertilisers are nitrogen (ammonia and urea), phosphates (ammonium phosphates), and potassium (muriate of potash and sulphate of potash). In addition, sulphate has gained increased attention over the past several years due to soils becoming deficient in sulphur (the ‘fourth macronutrient’).

Global fertiliser demand is expected to increase significantly in the coming years due to the world population growth accompanied by decreasing arable land per capita, changes in diet and growth in income. These increases will provide an incentive for farmers to increase fertiliser use for improved yields and quality.

The most widely available source of potassium used by growers is Muriate of Potash (MOP or KCl), with around 65 million tonnes consumed annually. SOP is a speciality type of potassium fertilisers that is produced and consumed on a smaller scale.

MOP is widely used in all types of farming, however it can be detrimental to some plants, especially fruits and vegetables, due to its chloride content. SOP is primarily used as a source of potassium for crops intolerant to chloride. SOP is priced at a premium to MOP, due to supply constraints, high production costs and because of its ability to be used on chloride intolerant crops (such as fruits, vegetables, beans, nuts, potatoes, tea, tobacco and turf grass), which typically sell at sufficiently higher prices to absorb the premium cost.

SOP can be used in most applications where MOP is used and is preferred in many circumstances as it enhances yield and quality, shelf life and improves taste. SOP generally outperforms MOP in terms of crop quality and yield. SOP performs particularly well with crops that have a low tolerance to the chloride in MOP and in arid, saline and heavily cultivated soils. The low volume of SOP consumption relative to market demand is partly a result of the scarcity of reliable SOP supply.

SOP’s premium to the MOP price is correlated to the conversion costs from MOP to SOP (Mannheim Process) where MOP is used as an input in the process. The premium has been around 60% for the past decade. In recent years, this premium has expanded significantly, as decreases in the MOP price have not translated to similar declines in the price of SOP, indicating that the SOP market is supply constrained.

SOP can be sold as a standard powder, premium granular or soluble product. Granular and soluable SOP generally attracts a price premium. Salt Lake Potash plans to sell at a premium to the market price as a certified organic producer and also with a soluable product offering. The premium achievable for a soluable product can be upwards of 20% (CRU SOP Market Study May 2019).

The Company has engaged Argus Media (Argus) and CRU International Group to provide market analysis on both the broader SOP market and also specifically the Lake Way Project. The current SOP price averages between US$525/t (NW Europe – Standard bulk) (Argus Media 6 June 2019) and US$625 (California) (Greenmarkets 31 May 2019) with Salt Lake Potash utilising a life of mine SOP price of US$550/t (FOB) for the Scoping Study.

The Company will initially be targeting both global and domestic markets for its premium grade SOP product. SOP production is not easily substitutable and is in supply deficit, therefore the Company is confident in the current and forecasted levels of demand.

MINING TENURE

The Lake Way Project site has been secured with a mixture of contractual rights with Blackham Resources under the Access Agreement and Salt Lake Potash’s own exploration and mining tenements and applications. The Company’s and Blackham Resources mineral exploration and mining tenement locations are detailed in Table 10.

Salt Lake Potash is optimising the tenure approval process by staging the required approvals to ensure construction will be undertaken in line with the project schedule.

In addition to the exploration and mining tenements the Company is progressing the approval for various miscellaneous licences for non-process infrastructure, including water and power.

Table 10: Tenure Summary

Tenement

Status

Holding Name

E53/1878

Live

Piper Preston Pty Ltd

E53/1897

Live

Piper Preston Pty Ltd

E53/2057

Pending

Piper Preston Pty Ltd

E53/2059

Pending

Piper Preston Pty Ltd

E53/2060

Pending

Piper Preston Pty Ltd

L53/208

Pending

Piper Preston Pty Ltd

M53/1102

Pending

Piper Preston Pty Ltd

E53/1862

Live

Kimba Resources Pty Ltd

E53/1905

Pending

Matilda Operations Pty Ltd

E53/1952

Pending

Kimba Resources Pty Ltd

M53/121

Live

Kimba Resources Pty Ltd

M53/122

Live

Kimba Resources Pty Ltd

M53/123

Live

Kimba Resources Pty Ltd

M53/147

Live

Kimba Resources Pty Ltd

M53/253

Live

Kimba Resources Pty Ltd

M53/796

Live

Kimba Resources Pty Ltd

M53/797

Live

Kimba Resources Pty Ltd

M53/798

Live

Kimba Resources Pty Ltd

M53/910

Live

Kimba Resources Pty Ltd

P53/1642

Live

Kimba Resources Pty Ltd

P53/1646

Live

Kimba Resources Pty Ltd

P53/1666

Live

Matilda Operations Pty Ltd

P53/1667

Live

Matilda Operations Pty Ltd

P53/1668

Live

Matilda Operations Pty Ltd

ENVIRONMENTAL

Salt Lake Potash has engaged Pendragon Environmental Solutions (Pendragon) and a number of specialist ecological consultants to provide assistance with the necessary approvals for the Lake Way Project.

The Company has identified the key environmental risks for Lake Way Project and has commenced and completed its own studies to obtain the necessary information for the Company to complete environmental impact assessment/referral documentation as required under the Environmental Protection Act 1986 (EPA Act). In addition to the studies commissioned by the Company, the arrangement Salt Lake Potash has established with Blackham Resources has afforded the Company access to an extensive range of environmental studies completed by Blackham Resources across the Lake Way region. Refer Table 11 below for a summary of the key relevant studies completed by the Company and Blackham Resources to date.

The early environmental study information available, has greatly improved the Company’s understanding of the local and regional environment. This has allowed the Company to optimise and de-risk the development to minimise environmental impacts and constraints.

Table 11: Surveys Completed

Report Title

Area

Date

Study Description

Flora and Vegetation Assessment Lake Way Demonstration Plant Project

Lake Way and Surrounds

2019

Level 1 and Field Survey

Demonstration Plant Flood study

Lake Way

2019

Flood study

Lake Way Acid Sulphate Soil investigation

Lake Way

2019

Acid Sulphate investigation

Lake Way Fauna assessment of proposed project area

Lake Way and Surrounds

2019

Level 1 and Field Survey

Fauna Survey

Lake Way and Surrounds

2019

Targeted Night Parrot Survey

Lake Way Potash Project Subterranean Fauna Baseline Survey

Lake Way and Surrounds

2017

Level 1 Baseline survey

Detailed Flora and Vegetation Survey Lake Way Potash Project

West of Lake Way

2017

Level 1

Lake Way Potash Project Wetland Ecology Baseline Survey

Lake Way and Surrounds

2017

Level 1 Base line Survey

Fauna Survey Lake Way Potash

Lake Way and Surrounds

2017

Level 2

Fauna Assessment Lake Way Project Area

Lake Way and Surrounds

2016

Level 1

Flora & Vegetation Survey Lake Way

Lake and Surrounds

2015

Level 1

Matilda Gold Project Murchison Western Australia

Williamson Pit, Matilda Operations and Wiluna

2015

Level 1 Biological Survey

Matilda Gold Project Murchison Western Australia

Williamson Pit, Matilda Operations and Wiluna

2015

Field survey for Landscape Function Analysis Survey

Biological Assessment of Lake Way 2009

Lake Way and Surrounds and E53/1897

2010

Field Investigation of Lake Way discharge environment

NATIVE TITLE AND HERITAGE

The Lake Way Project is located in the Wiluna Peoples’ native title determination area (WCD2013/004). The Determination first took effect 23 January 2015, covering an area of approximately 40,665 km2. The determination area includes a number of pastoral leases, parts of the township of Wiluna, parts of the Canning Stock Route, areas of unallocated Crown Land and the Lake Way Project area.

Tarlka Matuwa Piarku Aboriginal Corporation RNTBC (TMPAC) manage the Wiluna Peoples native title rights over their determined area.

In December 2018, the Company signed a Native Title Land Access and Brine Minerals Exploration Agreement (the Agreement) with TMPAC, on behalf of the Wiluna People, covering the Lake Way Project area and providing consent to the grant of its exploration licences and for the area required for the construction and operation of the first phase of Evaporation Ponds.

The Company is continuing extensive consultation with TMPAC to achieve a Native Title Mining Agreement to provide consent to the grant of its mining lease and for the ongoing mining operation. The Native Title Mining Agreement negotiations are advanced and the Native Title Mining Agreement is expected to be finalised and signed in the near future.

The Aboriginal Cultural Material Committee (ACMC) is of the view that Lake Way is an Aboriginal Site for the purposes for the Aboriginal Heritage Act 1972. The Company’s full and ongoing consultation with TMPAC, will enable the Project to take into consideration TMPAC’s heritage requirements. The Company has, with the support of TMPAC, established a framework for obtaining consents under the Aboriginal Heritage Act 1972 necessary to ensure continuity of works on the Lake.

ECONOMICS

Operating Costs

Operating costs have been estimated for the Lake Way Project based on the production rate of 200,000tpa to an accuracy of ±30%.

The estimated cash operating costs were built up by creating cost schedules for the following categories:

Table 12: Operating Costs

Area

Cost per tonne ($A)

Labour

 $    49

Power

 $    33

Maintenance

 $    17

Reagents

 $      3

Consumables

 $    37

Miscellaneous

 $    27

General and Administration

 $    18

Total (Operating Costs per tonne) Mine Gate

 $  184

Transportation

 $    80

Total (Operating Costs per tonne)

 $  264

The total operating cash cost estimate of $264/t places the Lake Way Project as the lowest cost producer globally for SOP projects.

Capital Costs

Salt Lake Potash estimates the total capital cost to construct the brine extraction, evaporation and process plant and associated infrastructure to produce 200,000tpa SOP at $237 million.

Table 13: Capital Costs

Area

$Am

Brine Extraction

22

Evaporation

36

Process Plant

75

Plant Infrastructure

20

Area Infrastructure

12

Regional Infrastructure

1

Miscellaneous

11

Total Direct

177

Temporary Facilities

7

EPCM

21

Total Indirect

28

Total Bare

205

Growth Allowance

32

Total Initial Capital

237

Royalties, Taxes, Depreciation, and Depletion

The Scoping Study project economics include the following key parameters related to royalties, tax, depreciation, and depletion allowances:

·    State Government Royalties are 2.5% of Gross Revenue

·    Other Royalties up to 4.9% of Gross Revenue

·    Tax rate of 30% is applied

·    Depreciation is assumed on a diminishing basis over the life of the assets

Financial Modelling

An economic model has been prepared which reflects the proposed mine life for the Lake Way Project of 20 years. The Scoping Study assumes first production to occur in Q4 2020 with a gradual ramp up to full name plate capacity of 200,000tpa over the year 2021. This assumes completion of the BFS in Q3 2019 and a development timeframe of 12-15 months subject to availability of funding and in accordance with required approvals.

Financial modelling of the Lake Way Project highlights exceptional economic returns with a post tax NPV8 of $381m (pre-tax NPV8A$580m) and a post tax IRR of 27% (pre-tax IRR of 33%). Table 2 provides a summary of production and cost figures for the Lake Way Project.

Payback Period

Payback period for the initial development capital for the Lake Way Project is 3.2 years. The payback period is based on free-cash flow, after taxes.

Sensitivity Analysis

The Scoping Study was prepared at a ±30% accuracy to investigate the technical and economic parameters of a SOP production operation at Lake Way.

The Company has modelled numerous scenarios during the study process to evaluate the impact of key inputs to the Lake Way Project economics. The modelling has highlighted the robustness of the project with the findings detailed in Table 14 and 15 below.

Table 14: Scenario Analysis – NPV

Sensitivities (NPV)

-20%

-15%

-10%

-5%

Base

5%

10%

15%

20%

Price

197

243

289

335

381

427

473

519

565

FX

611

543

483

430

381

338

298

261

228

Operating Costs

449

432

415

398

381

364

347

331

314

Capital Costs

420

410

401

391

381

372

362

352

343

Table 15: Scenario Analysis – IRR

Sensitivities (IRR)

-20%

-15%

-10%

-5%

Base

5%

10%

15%

20%

Price

19%

21%

23%

25%

27%

29%

31%

32%

34%

FX

36%

33%

31%

29%

27%

25%

23%

22%

20%

Operating Costs

30%

29%

28%

28%

27%

26%

25%

25%

24%

Capital Costs

33%

31%

30%

28%

27%

26%

25%

24%

23%

NEXT STEPS

On the back of the outstanding results from the Scoping Study, the Company has commenced a Bankable Feasibility Study (BFS). Due to the advanced nature of the Scoping Study the Company expects to deliver the BFS within Q3 2019.

Salt Lake Potash is in advanced discussions with a debt provider for a debt funding package which will support funding for the Lake Way Project.

In parallel with work being undertaken on the BFS and utilising experience gained from the construction of the initial Evaporation Ponds, the Company is moving into a Front End Engineering Design (FEED).

For further information please visit www.so4.com.au or contact:

 

Tony Swiericzuk / Clint McGhie

Salt Lake Potash Limited

Tel: +61 8 6559 5800

Jo Battershill

Salt Lake Potash Limited

Tel: +44 7540 366000

Colin Aaronson / Richard Tonthat / Ben Roberts

Grant Thornton UK LLP (Nominated Adviser)

Tel: +44 (0) 20 7383 5100

Derrick Lee / Beth McKiernan

Cenkos Securities plc (Joint Broker)

Tel: +44 (0) 131 220 6939

Rupert Fane / Ingo Hofmaier / Ernest Bell

Hannam & Partners (Joint Broker)

Tel: +44 (0) 20 7907 8500

 

 

The information contained within this announcement is deemed to constitute inside information as stipulated under the Market Abuse Regulations (EU) No. 596/2014. Upon the publication of this announcement, this inside information is now considered to be in the public domain.

Forward Looking Statements

This announcement may include forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based on Salt Lake Potash’s expectations and beliefs concerning future events. Forward looking statements are necessarily subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are outside the control of Salt Lake Potash, which could cause actual results to differ materially from such statements. Salt Lake Potash makes no undertaking to subsequently update or revise the forward-looking statements made in this announcement, to reflect the circumstances or events after the date of that announcement.

 

Competent Persons Statement

The information in this Announcement that relates to Mineral Resources is extracted from the report entitled ‘Significant High-Grade SOP Resource Delineated at Lake Way’ dated 18 March 2019. This announcement is available to view on www.so4.com.au. The information in the original ASX Announcement that related to Mineral Resources was based on, and fairly represents, information compiled by Mr Ben Jeuken, who is a member Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (AusIMM) and a member of the International Association of Hydrogeologists. Mr Jeuken is employed by Groundwater Science Pty Ltd, an independent consulting company. Mr Jeuken has sufficient experience, which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity, which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Salt Lake Potash Limited confirms that it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in the original market announcement and, in the case of estimates of Mineral Resources, that all material assumptions and technical parameters underpinning the estimates in the relevant market announcement continue to apply and have not materially changed. Salt Lake Potash Limited confirms that the form and context in which the Competent Person’s findings are presented have not been materially modified from the original market announcement.

The information in this announcement that relates to Process Testwork Results is extracted from the report entitled ‘Field Trials at Lake Way Confirm Salt Production Process’ dated 29 January 2019. This announcement is available to view on www.so4.com.au. The information in the original ASX Announcement that related to Process Testwork Results was based on, and fairly represents, information compiled by Mr Bryn Jones, BAppSc (Chem), MEng (Mining) who is a Fellow of the AusIMM. Mr Jones is a Director of Salt Lake Potash Limited. Mr Jones has sufficient experience, which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking, to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Salt Lake Potash Limited confirms that it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in the original market announcement. Salt Lake Potash Limited confirms that the form and context in which the Competent Person’s findings are presented have not been materially modified from the original market announcement.

The information in this report that relates to the Process Plant, Non-Process Infrastructure and Capital and Operating Costs are based on information compiled by Mr Peter Nofal, who is a fellow of AusIMM. Mr Nofal is employed by Wood, an independent consulting company. Mr Nofal has sufficient experience, which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity, which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Mr Nofal consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.

 

SUMMARY OF MODIFYING FACTORS AND MATERIAL ASSUMPTIONS

The Modifying Factors included in the JORC Code have been assessed as part of the Scoping Study, including mining (brine extraction), processing, metallurgical, infrastructure, economic, marketing, legal, environmental, social and government factors. The Company has received advice from appropriate experts when assessing each Modifying Factor.

A summary assessment of each relevant Modifying Factor is provided below.

Mining (Brine Extraction) – refer to sections entitled ‘Project Geology and Mineral Resource’ and ‘Mining and Production Target’ in the Announcement.

Salt Lake Potash has conducted extensive exploration programs across Lake Way involving numerous evaluation methods.

To evaluate the lake bed sediments, sampling and data collation for the exploration field programme comprised extended pumping trials at 5 trenches across the lake for hydraulic parameter determination of drainable porosity and hydraulic conductivity (permeability). Separately, 49 test pits were developed and evaluated to assess variations in geology, brine grade and hydraulic parameters (determined from recovery testing and laboratory testing of in situ samples) across the Lake and 13 auger holes were developed to assess the deeper layers of the lake bed sediments validating the variations in geology and hydraulic parameters.

Salt Lake Potash undertook work in relation to the paleochannel which comprised a volumetric calculation from the geophysics and aquifer parameters and brine grade from the test pumping.

The Company engaged an independent hydrogeological consultant with substantial salt lake brine expertise, Groundwater Science Pty Ltd, to complete the Mineral Resource Estimate for the Lake Way Project. The Principal Hydrogeologist of Groundwater Science, Mr Jeuken, has over 10 years of experience in groundwater resources assessment and management for mining. He has experience in salt lake brine potash evaluation, aquifer testing, wellfield planning and installation for mining, and the development of conceptual hydrogeological models.

Refer to ASX Announcement dated 18 March 2019 for further details on the Mineral Resource Estimate upon which the production target is based.

The hydrological model was produced by the Company in consultation with independent experts. The two methods of extraction outlined in the Announcement are common practice for brine extraction. These extraction methods are used by the three main current operations which include Great Salt Lake in the US, Lop Nur Salt Lake (Luobupo) and SQM in Chile.

Recharge is a key element of the mining strategy, as it refills the drainable porosity and activates salts contained within the retained porosity by physical diffusion. Direct rainfall recharge has been estimated from water level fluctuations due to rainfall and specific yield (Groundwater Science, 2017). Evaporation from water ponded in the Lake was set to 0.7 x (pan evaporation).

Recharge calculations used in the abstraction model were based on historic (1971 – 1990) precipitation at Wiluna and estimated surface inflows (Groundwater Science, 2018) into the lake for a 20-year production period.

Importantly, over the life of mine, 96% of the total production target is in the Measured and Indicated resource categories:

·    Lake Bed Sediment (84% of the total production target)

o  80% Measured resource category

o  4% Inferred resources category

·    Paleochannel Basel Sands

o  16% Indicated resource category

The Inferred resource included in the total production target is located at the southern end of Lake Way and is expected to be the last of the brine extraction system constructed. Whilst the Company has a reasonable expectation that this portion of the Inferred Mineral Resource will be capable of resource category upgrade, it does not feature as a significant portion of production either during the payback period or during the life of mine.

Processing (including Metallurgical) – refer to sections entitled ‘Brine Evaporation’ and ‘Process Plant’ in the Announcement.

The Company engaged brine-processing experts Carlos Perucca Processing Consulting Ltd (CPPC) and AD Infinitum Ltd (AD Infinitum) and their principals Mr Perucca and Mr Bravo, who are highly regarded international experts in the potash industry. Mr Bravo previously worked as Process Manager Engineer at SQM, the third largest salt lake SOP producer globally. He specialises in the front end of brine processing from feed brine through to the crystallisation of harvest salts. Mr Perucca has over 25 years of experience in mineral process engineering and will provide high-level expertise with respect to plant operations for the processing of harvest salts through to final SOP product. AD Infinitum and CPPC were responsible for the brine evaporation and salt processing components in the Scoping Study.

Lake Way’s process development relied heavily on experience applied by Wood, SRC and specialist consultants (CPPC and Ad Infinitum) who are well experienced from working on similar operations. Production of SOP from lake brines is well understood and a well-established process.

Salt Lake Potash has conducted extensive testing of lake brines and harvest salts from its salt lake projects, predominantly Lake Way and Lake Wells. The testing conducted to date supports that lake brine can be concentrated economically, via solar evaporation, to produce mixed potassium sulphate double salts. It has also been shown that these salts, when harvested, can be economically converted into a valuable, high purity SOP fertiliser product.

In early 2018, modelling of the Lake Way evaporation pathway was completed by solar evaporation experts, Ad-Infinitum. The modelling revealed that the salts produced by solar evaporation were suitable for processing into SOP. The potassium harvest salts were predicted to include leonite (K2SO4·MgSO4·4H2O), schoenite (K2SO4·MgSO4·6H2O) and kainite (KCl·MgSO4·2.75H2O), which are all amenable to the conversion to SOP via the process developed for Lake Wells.

In March 2018, laboratory scale (wind tunnel) evaporation tests were initiated on brine from both the Williamson Pit and Lake Way brine. These tests were compared to the brine evaporation chemistry predicted by Ad-Infinitum showing an excellent correlation to the model. The tests also confirmed the Williamson Pit brine to be a pre-concentrated form of Lake Way brine with similar evaporation brine chemistry.

In April 2018, field evaporation tests were initiated at Lake Way as part of the Lake Way Site Evaporation Trials. These tests consisted of small batch tests designed to duplicate wind tunnel tests at site conditions, and larger batch tests including a specific evaporation rate trial to validate the Ad-Infinitum evaporation modelling.

Three small batch tests were completed in December 2018 using Lake Way playa brine and Williamson pit brine (INT-LY, INT-WP and INT-WP2). Each batch began with a single fill of brine and was subject to evaporation until the brine was exhausted of economic levels of potassium. The volume of brine was moved into progressively smaller ponds throughout the trial and the residual salts were harvested. The harvest salts were homogenised and sampled for analysis and characterisation.

A number of larger batch evaporation tests using larger evaporation ponds were conducted in parallel, and further batch evaporation testing has been continued throughout 2019.

These large batches began with over 100 tonnes of Lake Way playa brine and were operated in a similar manner to the smaller trials. Over 5 tonnes have been harvested from these batch trials. Throughout the trial, brine concentration was monitored and a portion was removed at various concentrations for use in an evaporation rate trial, consisting of multiple class “A” evaporation pans of varying brine concentrations.

The nearby weather station at Wiluna Airport, operated and maintained by the Bureau of Meteorology, provides meteorological conditions to correlate brine evaporation performance for the test work.

Harvest salts from laboratory evaporation tests have been sent to Saskatchewan Research Council (SRC) in Canada to perform a flowsheet testing program for the Lake Way Project. The program’s objective was to verify the suitability of the previous process flowsheet conditions developed for the Lake Wells project. The testing program involved:

·    Mineralogical characterisation

·    Conversion of mixed harvest salts to schoenite

·    Reverse flotation of halite from converted salts

·    Crystallisation tests to produce high purity SOP.

It was found that the type of potassium salts present in the Lake Way harvests were similar to Lake Wells (Kainite, Leonite and Schoenite) albeit in different ratios and therefore the process flowsheet remains very similar to Lake Wells. It was also found that potassium was present in both fine and coarse size fractions in the laboratory produced harvest salt sample, therefore finer crushing was required to achieve similar flotation results to Lake Wells. On-going tests are being undertaken on the site generated harvest salt to confirm mineralogy, size fraction and hence crushing size.

The program demonstrated that Lake Way harvest salt can be successfully converted to SOP using the identified process flowsheet, including; attritioning, crushing, conversion, flotation and crystallisation to produce an SOP product of very good chemical quality (>52% K2O equivalent).

Infrastructure – refer to sections entitled ‘Major Infrastructure’ and ‘Product Transport and Logistics’ in the Announcement.

Lake Way’s proximity to the West Australian goldfields means relatively minor area infrastructure upgrades and modifications are required.

The Scoping Study was managed by Wood. Wood is a recognised global leader in potash projects with capabilities extending to detailed engineering, procurement and construction management. Wood are able to leverage an international network, including access to its Centre of Potash Excellence located in Saskatoon, Canada.

Salt Lake Potash engaged several highly qualified transport logistic companies to assist with defining the optimal logistics solution for transportation of SOP to port facilities. The transport cost estimates have been derived directly from transport providers who have extensive knowledge of the Western Australian logistics market.

Marketing – refer to section entitled ‘Product Quality and Marketing’ in the Announcement.

Independent potash market forecasts and assessments were provided by experts CRU International and Argus Media.

These reports emphasised that the specifications proposed by Salt Lake Potash of a K2O content of >52% and Chloride content of <0.1% placed the product into the premium range. The reports confirmed that it would be feasible for Salt Lake Potash to monetise the high level of K2O content in its product relative to the more commonly traded specifications of 50-51% K2O. There is also a market for premium pricing for low chloride content where the chloride content can consistently be produced at levels below 0.5%.

The Company has previously entered MOUs with Mitsubishi Australia Limited and Sinofert Holdings Limited setting out the basis for binding offtake agreements. The Company continues to progress discussions with these parties and others with a view to signing binding offtake and marketing agreements for the future sale of its product.

Economic – refer to sections entitled ‘Economics’ in the Announcement.

Capital Estimates have been prepared by Salt Lake Potash and Wood, a global expert in engineering, using a combination of cost estimates from suppliers, historical data, reference to recent comparable projects, and benchmarked construction costs for Western Australia. Costs are presented in real 2019 terms and are exclusive of escalation. The overall accuracy is deemed to be ± 30%.

Capital costs include the cost of all services, direct costs, contractor indirects, EPCM expenses, non-process infrastructure, area infrastructure, sustaining capital and other facilities used for the operation of the Mine and Process Plant.

Operating costs have been estimated by Salt Lake Potash and Wood. Operating costs are based on a combination of first principles build-up, direct supplier quotes, and experience on similar projects with unit rates benchmarked to costs attributable to Western Australia.

Labour costs have been developed based on a first-principles build-up of staffing requirements with labour rates from bench marks for the Western Australian region.

Government royalties have been assumed at a 2.5% FOB gross revenue basis for the life of the project. Private royalties associated with Blackham Resources and Native Title are up to 4.9% gross revenue depending on the level of brine derived from Blackham Resources tenure.

Royalties account for an average life of mine cost of A$20/t per annum.

Rehabilitation and mine closure costs are included within the discounted cash flow modelling based on 10% of initial development capital and incurred at the end of mine life.

A detailed financial model and discounted cash flow (DCF) analysis has been prepared in order to demonstrate the economic viability of the Project. The DCF analysis demonstrated compelling economics of the Lake Way Project, with an NPV (ungeared, after-tax, at an 8% discount rate) of A$382 million, assuming a LOM Sulphate of Potash price of US$550/t and an (ungeared) IRR of 27%.

The Scoping Study assumes first production to occur in Q4 2020 with a gradual ramp up to full name plate capacity of 200,000tpa over the year 2021. This assumes completion of the BFS in Q3 2019 and a development timeframe of 12-15 months subject to availability of funding and in accordance with required approvals.

Sensitivity analysis was performed on all key assumptions used including price operating and capital costs and exchange rate. The sensitivity analysis highlighted the robustness of the project with the breakeven pricing calculated at US$323/t being a greater than 40% discount to central pricing assumptions.

Payback period for the Lake Way Project is 3.2 years. The payback period is based on free-cash flow, after taxes.

Salt Lake Potash is confident in being able to secure the required funding to develop the Lake Way Project.  The Company is in advanced discussions with a debt provider for a debt funding package which will support funding for the Lake Way Project. This is also supported by the recent capital raising of A$20.25m (ASX announcement 6 June 2019).

Environmental – refer to section entitled ‘Environmental’ in the Announcement.

An opportunities and constraints assessment was completed for the Project by Pendragon Environmental, a leading Western Australian environmental management consultancy. Based on the Project’s stage of development, Pendragon Environmental confirmed there are no current impediments on the Project.

To date, Salt Lake Potash has only undertaken preliminary desktop studies for the purposes of identifying potential environmental opportunities and constraints. Extensive data is available across the Scoping Project area from work undertaken historically by Blackham Resources. The further development of the Project may require additional detailed flora, fauna and other studies; this is dependent on the final design criteria.

Social, Legal and Governmental – refer to sections entitled ‘Mining Tenure’ and ‘Native Title and Heritage’ in the Announcement.

The Company has taken legal advice in relation to relevant Modifying Factors.

Material Assumptions

Project Start Date

Q4 2020

 

Cost and Pricing Basis

2019 Dollars

 

Currency

Australian Dollars (unless otherwise stated)

 

Cost Escalation

0%

 

Revenue Escalation

0%

 

Scoping Study Accuracy

±30%

 

Capex Growth and Allowance

13%

 

Mining & Processing

Mineral Resource (Drainable Porosity)

8.2Mt

 

Portion of Production Target – Measured

80%

 

Portion of Production Target – Indicated

16%

 

Portion of Production Target – Inferred

4%

 

Trenches (production and transport) – average depth 5m

130km

 

Bores – average depth 120m

14

 

Bore Production rate

8.4L/s/bore

 

Trench yield rate (flow) – minimum

4L/s/km

 

Trench yield rate (flow) – maximum

8L/s/km

 

Brine Chemistry (average Lake Brine SOP grade)

15.2Kg/m3

 

Annual Production (steady state)

200ktpa

 

Life of mine

20 Years

 

Pond Recovery

78%

 

Plant Recovery

80%

 

Pricing

Sulphate of Potash (FOB)

US$550/t

 

Operating Costs

   

Brine Extraction

A$23/t

 

Brine Evaporation & Harvesting

A$23/t

 

Process Plant

A$104/t

 

Plant Infrastructure

A$4/t

 

Area Infrastructure

A$7/t

 

General & Administration

A$22/t

 

Transportation

A$80/t

 

Capital

   

Brine Extraction

A$22 million

 

Evaporation

A$36 million

 

Process Plant

A$75 million

 

Plant Infrastructure

A$20 million

 

Area Infrastructure

A$12 million

 

Regional Infrastructure

A$1 million

 

Miscellaneous

A$11 million

 

Indirect Costs & Growth

A$60 million

 

Other

   

Royalties

Govt – 2.5%

Other – 4.9%

 

Corporate tax rate

30%

 

Discount rate

8%

 

 

Salt Lake Potash (SO4) – Notice of AGM

Salt Lake Potash Limited (“the Company”) wishes to advise that the Annual General Meeting of the Company will be held at Level 14, 197 St Georges Terrace, Perth, Western Australia on Friday, 30 November 2018 at 11.00am (WST).

The Notice of Annual General Meeting, including an explanatory memorandum in respect of all resolutions to be put to shareholders, has been sent to shareholders and is available to be downloaded from the Company’s website: www.saltlakepotash.com.au

The Company is also sending its annual report for the year ended 30 June 2018 to shareholders and it is now available on the Company’s website at: www.saltlakepotash.com.au

For further information please visit www.saltlakepotash.com.au or contact:

Clint McGhie

Salt Lake Potash Limited

Tel: +61 8 9322 6322

Colin Aaronson/Richard Tonthat
/Ben Roberts

Grant Thornton UK LLP (Nominated Adviser)

Tel: +44 (0)207 383 5100

 

This information is provided by RNS, the news service of the London Stock Exchange. RNS is approved by the Financial Conduct Authority to act as a Primary Information Provider in the United Kingdom. Terms and conditions relating to the use and distribution of this information may apply. For further information, please contact rns@lseg.com or visit www.rns.com.

END

Salt Lake Potash (SO4) – September 2018 Quarterly Report and Appendix 5B

The Board of Salt Lake Potash Limited (the Company or SLP) is pleased to present its Quarterly Report for the period ending 30 September 2018.

The Company’s primary focus is progressing the development of the Goldfields Salt Lakes Project (GSLP), intended to be the first salt-lake brine Sulphate of Potash (SOP) production operation in Australia.

Highlights for the quarter and subsequently include:

APPOINTMENT OF MANAGING DIRECTOR / CEO

  • Highly regarded mining executive Tony Swiericzuk appointed as Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer of Salt Lake Potash effective 5 November 2018.
  • Mr Swiericzuk recently spent 9 years with Fortescue Metals Group, including as Director Business Development and Exploration, General Manager Christmas Creek Mine and General Manager Port.
  • Mr Swiericzuk’s initial focus will be the rapid development of Australia’s first SOP operation.

LAKE WAY

Maiden Resource for Lake Way

  • Measured mineral resource estimate of 32,000t SOP for the Williamson Pit Brine. The resource grade of 25kg/m3of SOP is easily the highest grade SOP brine resource in Australia.
  • Indicated resource estimate of 1,900,000t SOP calculated from Total Porosity (Stored) and 490,000t calculated from Drainable Porosity reported for the Blackham Resources tenements.

Scoping Study for Low Capex, High Margin Demonstration Plant

  • The Company completed a Scoping Study on the development of a 50,000tpa SOP Demonstration Plant at Lake Way that supports a low capex, highly profitable, staged development model, with total capital costs of approximately A$49m and average cash operating costs (FOB) of approximately A$387/t.
  • The Demonstration Plant is intended to validate the technical and commercial viability of brine SOP production from the GSLP, providing the basis to build a world class, low cost, long life SOP operation across the 9 lakes in the GSLP.

Process Testwork

  • Completed validation testwork that confirmed the process flowsheet to be used in the Lake Way Demonstration Plant Scoping Study.
  • A bulk field evaporation trial processing both Lake Way and Williamson Pit brine is ongoing, to confirm the modelled evaporation parameters and produce harvest salt samples for SOP production.

Geotechnical Investigations

  • The Company significantly progressed the design of the Williamson Ponds to dewater the Williamson Pit at Lake Way.

Approval to Construct Williamson Ponds

  • The Department of Mines, Industry Regulation and Safety (DMIRS) gave environmental approval for the pond system to dewater the Williamson Pit at Lake Way.

LAKE WELLS

MOU with Australian Potash to study sharing infrastructure and other costs at Lake Wells

  • The Company and Australian Potash Limited (ASX: APC) entered into a Memorandum of Understanding and Co-operation Agreement to undertake a joint study of the potential benefits of development cost sharing for each Company’s projects at Lake Wells.

Granting of Mining Lease

  • The Company’s first Mining Lease at Lake Wells covering 87.4 km2 was granted, a significant milestone in the Project’s development pathway.

LAKE BALLARD

  • A fieldwork programme of 38 test pits was completed over the extent of the lake area.  The test pits enabled geology, brine chemistry and hydraulic parameters to be understood. 
  • Commenced site evaporation trials to confirm pathway for salt production in field conditions.

SOP SAMPLE PRODUCTION

  • SOP granulation testwork produced initial samples for marketing and product quality assessment.
  • Testwork began in SLP’s in-house laboratory to replicate process flowsheet on larger batch scale. 

 

APPOINTMENT OF MANAGING DIRECTOR / CEO

Subsequent to the end of the quarter, the Company appointed Tony Swiericzuk as Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer (CEO), effective 5 November 2018.

Mr Swiericzuk is a Mining Engineer with outstanding credentials as a builder and operator of mining projects, having recently been General Manager of the Christmas Creek Mine from 2012 to 2017. He oversaw the construction, commissioning and ramp-up of this project from 15Mtpa to 60Mtpa in his initial 2 year period, then proceeded to optimise the operation and help drive FMG to become the world’s lowest cost iron ore producer.

In his initial years at FMG Mr Swiericzuk was General Manager Port Operations in Port Hedland and managed the ramp up from 20Mtpa to 60Mtpa from 2009 to 2011.

Mr Swiericzuk has the ideal operating and commercial experience to rapidly deliver on the exceptional potential of the Goldfields Salt Lakes Project (GSLP). The GSLP is a technically advanced, sustainable and highly scalable project to produce sought-after chlorine free fertilisers for the export and domestic markets.

Mr Swiericzuk’s diverse background in large scale logistics operations will be a substantial benefit to the development of the GSLP and he also intends to utilise the tried and proven methods which were essential in making FMG the lowest cost iron ore producer in the world.

Current CEO of the Company, Mr Matthew Syme, was integral to Mr Swiericzuk’s appointment and will remain a director and consultant to the Company, ensuring a seamless handover.

THE GOLDFIELDS SALT LAKES PROJECT

The Company’s long term plan is to develop an integrated SOP operation, producing from a number (or all) of the lakes within the GSLP, after confirming the technical and commercial elements of the Project through construction and operation of a Demonstration Plant producing up to 50,000tpa of SOP.

The GSLP has a number of important, favourable characteristics:

  • Very large paleochannel hosted brine aquifers at each Lake, with chemistry amenable to production of salts by solar evaporation for SOP production, extractable from both low cost trenches and deeper bores;
  • Over 3,300km2 of playa surface, with in-situ clays suitable for low cost on-lake pond construction;
  • Excellent evaporation conditions;
  • Excellent access to transport, energy and other infrastructure in the major Goldfields mining district;
  • Lowest quartile capex and opex potential based on the Lake Wells Scoping Study;
  • Clear opportunity to reduce transport costs by developing lakes closer to infrastructure and by capturing economies of scale;
  • Multi-lake production offers operational flexibility and diversification of risk from localised weather events;
  • The very high level of technical validation already undertaken at Lake Wells substantially applies to the other lakes in the GSLP; and
  • Potential co-product revenues, particularly where transport costs are lowest

Salt Lake Potash will progressively explore the lakes in the GSLP with a view to estimating resources for each Lake, in parallel with the development of the Demonstration Plant. Exploration of the lakes will be prioritised based on likely transport costs, scale, permitting pathway and brine chemistry.

The Company’s Memorandum of Understanding with Blackham Resources Limited (see ASX Announcement dated 12 March 2018) offers the potential for an expedited path to development at Lake Way, possibly the best site for a 50,000tpa Demonstration Plant in Australia.

A Scoping Study on the development of a 50,000tpa SOP Demonstration Plant at Lake Way was completed during the quarter, supporting a low capex, highly profitable, staged development model, with total capital costs of approximately A$49m and average cash operating costs (FOB) of approximately A$387/t.

LAKE WAY

Lake Way is located in the Goldfields region of Western Australia, less than 15km south of Wiluna. The surface area of the Lake is over 270km2.

Salt Lake Potash holds two Exploration Licences (one granted and one under application) covering most of Lake Way, including the paleochannel defined by previous exploration. The northern end of the Lake is largely covered by a number of Mining Leases, held by Blackham Resources Limited (Blackham), the owner of the Wiluna Gold Mine.

The Company entered into a Memorandum of Understanding with Blackham in March 2018 to investigate the development of an SOP operation on Blackham’s existing Mining Leases at Lake Way, including, initially, a 50,000tpa Demonstration Plant.

The Wiluna region is an historic mining precinct dating back to the late 19th century. It has been a prolific nickel and gold mining region with well developed, high quality infrastructure in place.

The Goldfields Highway is a high quality sealed road permitted to carry quad road trains and passes 2km from the Lake. The Goldfields Gas Pipeline is adjacent to SLP’s tenements, running past the eastern side of the Lake.

Lake Way has some compelling advantages which potentially make it an ideal site for an SOP operation, including:

  • Likely substantial capital and operating savings from sharing overheads and infrastructure with the Wiluna Gold Mine, including the accommodation camp, flights, power, maintenance, infrastructure and other costs.
  • The site has excellent potential freight solutions, being adjacent to the Goldfields Highway, which is permitted for heavy haulage, quad trailer road trains to the railhead at Leonora, or via other heavy haulage roads to Geraldton Port.
  • A Demonstration Plant would likely be built on Blackham’s existing Mining Leases.
  • SLP would dewater the existing Williamson Pit on Lake Way, prior to Blackham mining. The pit contains an estimated 1.2GL of brine at the exceptional grade of 25kg/m3 of SOP. This brine is potentially the ideal starter feed for evaporation ponds, having already evaporated from the normal Lake Way brine grade, which averages over 14kg/m3.
  • The high grade brines at Lake Way will result in lower capital and operating costs due to lower extraction and evaporation requirements.
  • There would be substantial savings to both parties from co-operating on exploration activities on each other’s ground.
  • The presence of clays in the upper levels of the lake which should be amenable to low cost, on-lake evaporation pond construction.

Mineral Resource

A maiden Mineral Resource Estimate for Lake Way (Blackham tenements only) was estimated by Groundwater Science Pty Ltd, an independent hydrogeological consultant with substantial salt lake brine expertise.

Areas outside the Blackham tenements at Lake Way, including the remaining playa surface covered by SLP tenements and applications, were not considered as part of the Mineral Resource estimate and provide significant future upside to increase resources at Lake Way.

Table 1: Lake Way Project – Mineral Resource Estimate (JORC 2012)

Total Mineral Resource Estimate (Blackham tenements only)  

Sediment Hosted Brine – Indicated (94%)

Playa Area

Lakebed Sediment Volume

Brine Concentration

Mineral Tonnage Calculated from Total Porosity

Mineral Tonnage Calculated from Drainable Porosity

K

Mg

SO4

Total Porosity

Brine Volume

SOP Tonnage

Drainable Porosity

Brine Volume

SOP Tonnage

(km2)

(Mm3)

(kg/m3)

(kg/m3)

(Kg/m3)

(Mm3)

(kt)

(Mm3)

(kt)

55.4

290

6.9

7.6

28.3

0.43

125

1,900

0.11

31.9

490

 

Williamson Pit Brine – Measured (6%)

Brine Volume (Mm3)

Potassium Conc.   (kg/m3)

Magnesium Conc.   (kg/m3)

Sulphate Conc.  

(kg/m3)

SOP Tonnage (kt)

1.26

11.4

14.47

48

32

Scoping Study

In July 2018, the Company completed a Scoping Study on development of a 50,000tpa sulphate of potash (SOP) Demonstration Plant at Lake Way that supports a low capex, highly profitable, staged development model.

The Demonstration Plant is supported by the Indicated resource estimate of 1,900,000t SOP calculated from Total Porosity (Stored) and 490,000t calculated from Drainable Porosity, a multiple of the resource required to support a 50,000tpa Demonstration Plant for 2-3 years.

The Demonstration Plant will produce up to 50,000tpa of high quality, standard SOP from hypersaline brine extracted from Lake Way via a system of shallow trenches.

The extracted brine will be transported to a series of solar evaporation ponds built on the Lake where selective evapo-concentration will precipitate potassium double salts in the final evaporation stage. These potassium-rich salts will be mechanically harvested and processed into SOP in a purification and crystallisation plant. The final product will then be transported for sale to domestic and international markets.

The Company has previously tested and verified, at Lake Wells, all the major technical foundations for production of SOP from salt lake brine under actual site conditions and across all seasons. These technical achievements are broadly applicable across all the lakes in the GSLP and form part of the inputs into the Scoping Study.  Subsequent testing of salts generated from Lake Way brine at the Saskatchewan Research Council (“SRC”) (Canada) has confirmed the validity of the GSLP process flowsheet selected for the Lake Way Demonstration Plant.

The Scoping Study established the indicative costs of the Demonstration Plant to +/- 30% accuracy for Operating Costs and -10%/+30% for Capital Expenditure.

Major Study Parameters

Table 2:  Key Assumptions and Inputs 

Maximum Study Accuracy Variation

+/- 30%

Annual Production (steady state)

50,000tpa

Proportion of Production Target – Measured & Indicated

100%

Mineral Resource (Blackham Mining Leases)

SOP Resource (Total Porosity)

2Mt

SOP Resource (Drainable Porosity)

490,000t

Williamson Pit (Measured)

32,000t

Mining Method (Extraction)

Trenches – Average 5m deep

30km

Brine Delivery

595m3/h

Brine Chemistry (SOP Lake Brine only)

15kg/m3

Evaporation Ponds

Area

389ha

Halite Ponds (unlined)

308ha

Harvest Ponds (partially lined)

81ha

Recovery of Potassium from feed brine

63%

Recovery of Sulphate from feed brine

21%

Plant

Operating time (h/a)

7,950

Total Staffing

20

Operating Costs  (±30%)

Minegate

A$251/t

Transport and Handling

A$96/t

Royalties 1

A$40/t

Total Cash Costs (FOB)

A$387/t

Capital Costs (-10%/+30%)

Direct

A$37.3m

Indirect

A$5.2m

Growth Allowance

A$6.3m

Total Capital

A$48.9m

1    Royalties (State Government 2.5% and Other 4.5%)

* Operating costs do not include deprecation or sustaining capital. The Demonstration Plant is intended to operate for 2-3 years to validate the production model, and a successful Demonstration Plant will naturally then be intregrated into a larger production operation.

Capital Expenditure

The initial capital cost to develop the Demonstration Plant has been estimated at A$43 million (before growth allowance). Capital expenditure was estimated at an accuracy of -10% to +30%.

Table 3: Capital Costs

$Am

1.6

7.8

20.3

3.0

0.1

2.6

1.9

37.3

0.4

4.8

5.2

42.5

6.3

48.9

* Errors due to rounding

The benefits of Lake Way’s location are evident in the low Area and Regional Infrastructure capital costs. The availability of a wide flat playa area with amenable in-situ clays offers the opportunity to construct low capex evaporation ponds on the Lake.

Operating Costs

The operating cost estimates are based on an accuracy of ±30%.

Table 4: Operating Costs

Cost per tonne ($A)

Labour

 $    57

Power

 $    24

Maintenance

 $    22

Reagents

 $    14

Consumables

 $    81

Miscellaneous

 $    32

General and Administration

 $    21

Total (Operating Costs per tonne) Mine Gate

 $  251

Transportation

 $    96

Total (Operating Costs per tonne)

 $  347

Royalties (2.5% State Government and 4.5% Others)

$    40

Total Operating Cost per tonne

$  387

* Errors due to rounding

Ongoing Hydrogeological Testwork

Following the completion of the Scoping Study, pumping of four trenches continued (LYTR01, 02, 03 and 04).  Trenches 1 and 2 were pumped for approximately 90 days each and terminated in mid-September in order to observe recovery.  Pumping of trenches 3 and 4 continues, to observe recharge effects during the upcoming wet season.

The extended time of pumping enabled the reconfirmation of the specific yield parameters quoted in the Scoping Study.  The analysis of the final dataset from Trenches 1 and 2 is expected to provide good estimations of aquifer transmissivity and Drainable Porosity that will be key to the further development of the numerical groundwater model.

Throughout the trench testing a brine sample was taken from each trench on a weekly basis with the objective of identifying any variation in brine grade due to the pumping. The results obtained to date show minimal variation in brine grade as the pumping progressed.

Geotechnical Investigations

During the quarter, the Company significantly progressed design of the Williamson Ponds to dewater the Williamson Pit at Lake Way.

A Cone Penetration Test (CPT) rig completed a soil testing programme across the Williamson Pond footprint. Thirty-one CPT’s were undertaken to measure the strength and permeability characteristics of lakebed sediments. The CPT’s provided data to define the geotechnical parameters that are required for final pond analysis and design.

Detailed engineering of the Williamson Ponds commenced, with geotechnical design work completed including CPT data analysis, trafficability assessment, access road analysis, setup of seepage models, borrow pit assessments and development of the Pond construction methodology. Further analysis and design work will produce design drawings for the Ponds.

Civil engineering work also included topographical surveys of the pond and process plant site areas.

Given the unique design and site conditions, the Company is planning an Earthworks Trial as part of the early works construction activities. The trial will finalise earthworks equipment selection and refine the construction methodology for on-lake embankments.

The Company is progressing with the contractor selection process for dewatering of the Williamson Pit.

Mines Department Approval

SLP received environmental approval from the Department of Mines, Industry Regulation and Safety (DMIRS) for the pond system to dewater the Williamson Pit at Lake Way.

DMIRS has given environmental approval to construct ponds totalling up to 133Ha, as well as ancillary infrastructure and a trench to provide conditioning brine to manage the chemistry of the brine extracted from the Williamson Pit.

The Williamson Ponds will be the first operational scale SOP evaporation ponds built on a salt lake in Australia – an important part of the staged de-risking and development at Lake Way and across the Goldfields Salt Lakes Project.

Construction of the Williamson ponds will proceed upon:

·     completion of final engineering designs and contractor engagements;

·     completion of formal documents with Blackham to supersede the MOU (already substantially advanced); and

·     satisfaction of aboriginal heritage requirements. 

Process Testwork

Brine evaporation modelling, conducted by international solar pond experts, Ad Infinitum, indicated the salts produced at Lake Way through the natural evaporation process will be comparable to those produced at Lake Wells and therefore suitable for conversion into SOP. 

The Company executed a range of process development testwork to confirm the Ad Infinitum model and validate inputs to the Lake Way Scoping Study production model. The testwork uses both brines from the lake playa and the super-concentrated brines from the Williamson Pit.

The Lake Way Site Evaporation Trial (SET) continued to process significant volumes of both Lake and Williamson Pit brine. Assay results from samples collected at regular intervals are used to confirm the evaporation pathway aligns closely with predictions from the Company’s evaporation modelling.

Harvest salt from the laboratory evaporation of Lake Way brine was processed at SRC (Canada) to confirm the flowsheet for the Lake Way Demonstration Plant. The Lake Way flowsheet utilises the same unit operations as the previously piloted Lake Wells flowsheet, giving the company confidence that the process is robust and highly transferrable with only minor modifications to crush size.

LAKE WELLS

MOU with Australia Potash

In September 2018, Salt Lake entered into a Memorandum of Understanding and Co-operation Agreement with Australian Potash Limited (ASX: APC) to undertake a joint study of the potential benefits of development cost sharing for each Company’s project developments at Lake Wells.

The Companies’ substantial project holdings at Lake Wells are contiguous with many common infrastructure elements, including access roads, proximity to the Leonora rail terminals, and potential power and fresh water solutions. Both Companies anticipate substantial potential Capex and Opex benefits from some level of infrastructure sharing, with further potential benefits arising from shared or common evaporation and salt processing facilities.

The Companies have agreed to constitute a joint study team to carry out an initial assessment of the merits of infrastructure cooperation. The team will also conduct a high-level review of potential benefits of upstream operational synergies. A substantial part of the Study work will be outsourced to independent engineers and both Companies intend to continue with their independent project developments in parallel with the Study.

Mining Lease

The Company’s first Mining Lease at Lake Wells was granted in September 2018, a significant milestone in the Projects development pathway.

ML 38/1278 covers 87.4km2 in the south east corner of the Lake Wells project. The Mining Lease has an initial 21 year term.

LAKE BALLARD

Geological Interpretation

Lake Ballard project is located about 15 km north of Menzies. The playa is a significant regional landform with a surface area of over 626km2. The geology of Lake Ballard is similar to that encountered at other lakes in the Company’s GSLP.   

The Lake Ballard drainage is incised into the granite-greenstone basement and now in filled with a mixed sedimentary sequence. The lake bed sediments are underlain by a deeper paleochannel characterised by a sandy layer at its base.

The lake bed sediments comprise a mixed sequence of sands, clays and silts reflecting the climatic and depositional environment that created firstly the paleochannel and subsequently the lake.

At Lake Ballard the surficial deposits also include a highly consolidated sand layer between 1.5 and 3m depth.  This layer is non continuous across the lake and acts as a local aquiclude that results in a release of hydrostatic pressure and localised high flows when broken through.

Surface Aquifer Exploration Programme

The Company mobilised an amphibious excavator on Lake Ballard in July 2018 to complete a surface aquifer exploration programme.

The objective of the programme was to gather geological and hydrological data about the shallow brine aquifer hosted by the Quaternary alluvium stratigraphic sequence in the upper levels of the Lake. The programme is to evaluate the geology of the shallow lakebed sediments, and to undertake pumping trials to provide estimates of the potential brine yield from trenches in the shallow sediment and ultimately enable estimation of an indicated resource calculated from Total Porosity and Drainable Porosity. The excavator programme provides important geological and geotechnical information for potential construction of trenches and on-lake brine evaporation ponds.

Previous work in 2017 included the excavation of 163 test pits and 8 trenches and brine sampling. Work during the quarter included re-evaluation of gravity data to locate the deepest part of the paleochannel (the Thalweg), resampling and hydraulic testing of 38 test pits across the lake comprising 17 of the 2017 test pits at the eastern end of the lake and 21 new test pits located across the lake.  The new pits were logged geologically and all pits were sampled for brine chemistry and hydraulic testing.  In addition, 170 test pits from the 2017 and 2018 programmes were rehabilitated and one of the 2017 trenches extended to a total length of 180m.

The programme is ongoing and involves an auger drilling programme and trench testing.

Gravity Re-evaluation

The gravity data initially collected in 2017 was re-evaluated to identify the location of the Thalweg. Of particular interest was the eastern end where the channel crosses from Lake Ballard to the adjacent Lake Marmion. This assessment will facilitate the location of targets for future drilling.

Test Pits

38 test pits were assessed in 2018 to develop a greater understanding of the geology and brine chemistry across the lake. The pits were dug to 5m. In-situ samples were taken using Shelby tubes for 5 pits to assess total and drainable porosity of the sediment. Preliminary results of the data available are summarised in Table 5.

Table 5: Shelby Tube Porosity and Effective Porosity Results

Sample Id

Sample Depth (m)

Total Porosity (%)

Drainable Porosity (%)

LBTT 121

1

52.5

12.5

LBTT 121

2

60.1

14.7

LBTT 121

3

35.2

6.5

LBTT 121

4

43.1

11.9

LBTT 144

0.75

55.8

12.4

LBTT 144

1.75

58.2

12.5

LBTT 144

2.75

45.4

5.4

LBTT 155

0.75

59.9

10.6

LBTT 155

1.75

38.5

4.2

LBTT 155

2.75

26.7

5.7

Brine Chemistry

Over 140 brine samples have been analysed for Lake Ballard. Brine chemistry is reasonably uniform across the lake. 

All brine samples are considered to be composite samples representing the whole excavated or drilled depth at each location. Given the proposed abstraction techniques will involve trenches excavated to at least 4m across a large portion of the playa, the use of composite samples is representative of the brine that will be extracted.

Between 2017 and 2018, 142 brine samples were analysed from the test pits and trenches. The full suite of brine samples including their location is attached in Appendix 2. 

The spatial distribution of potassium concentration across the samples is reasonably consistent ranging from 1,040 to 2,460 mg/L. There are several low measurements of potassium, all of which relate to samples taken from test pits very close to the lake shore. At the lake shore there is the potential for local dilution following freshwater runoff onto the lake that may result in a localised area of lower brine concentration.

Auger Drilling

The Company commenced an auger drilling programme at Lake Ballard in September to obtain insitu samples for geological logging, porosity measurement, specific yield testing and brine sampling. The holes were drilled using a track mounted auger rig, capable of drilling to between 15 – 20m depth depending on ground conditions.

The programme consisted of a total of 15 holes at 11 locations. Location and total depth is outlined in Table 6. A brine sample was also recovered at each location. 

The core sample was collected using hollow stem augers within which a 1m plastic tube was inserted.  The plastic tubes were sealed immediately upon retrieval to prevent drying and loss of entrained brine.

The programme was successful with over 130m of core collected, from which 45 samples were selected for laboratory analysis of total and drainable porosity.  The core samples chosen for analysis were representative of the programme in terms of both location and depth interval from surface to total depth.

All core was delivered to Core Laboratories and the analysis will be completed and reported in the next quarter.

Table 6: Hole Locations and Depths

Hole ID

Easting

Northing

Depth (m)

Cased

Brine Sample

LBPAG01

319177

6731097

12.7

LBPAG02

318517

6731243

10.8

Yes

LBPAG03

315539

6733652

13

Yes

B800061,62

LBPAG04

311947

6733975

13.5

B800063,64

LBPAG05

307467

6735256

14.5

B800065,66

LBPAG06(a)

303547

6733253

5

LBPAG06(b)

304066

6733890

9

LBPAG07(a)

301092

6737570

4.5

B800067,68

LBPAG07(b)

300749

6937786

4

LBPAG07(c)

300443

6737940

3

LBPAG08

303139

6739647

10

Yes

B800069,70

LBPAG09(a)

299465

6741072

4

LBPAG09(b)

299174

6741053

4.5

LBPAG10

294859

6741331

11

Yes

B800071,72

LBPAG11

290355

6741953

15

Yes

B800073,74

 

Further Planned Work

The Company intends to undertake further work at Lake Ballard, including pumping of 2 test trenches to determine aquifer properties including hydraulic conductivity and Drainable Porosity.

EVAPORATION MODELLING

The Company continued to develop in-house capability to model evaporation pathways for lake brines under differing conditions to inform evaporation pond design and model salt production. An in-house modelling tool has been developed using a combination of standard engineering expressions and a well established and proven chemical-thermodynamic database.

SOP SAMPLE PRODUCTION

Perth Laboratory

The Company began the process of converting 10 tonnes of harvest salts collected from the Lake Wells SET into SOP samples at the Company’s in-house laboratory in Perth at the end of the quarter.  The process being used is based upon the flowsheet previously tested by SRC.

An initial 2 tonnes of salt were selected to represent a range of seasonal outputs from the SET. The process will initially be simulated through a series of batch operations to investigate the effects of seasonality on process performance.

The ultimate aim of the in-house work is to generate several hundred kilograms of lake-derived SOP product for assessment of quality and for marketing purposes. The operation also provides the Company’s process team valuable hands-on experience in the operation of a salt-brine process.    

Product Preparation

The Company is considering a range of product preparations for commercial scale production of SOP including standard (powder), compacted, spherical (granular) and soluble products.

During the quarter the Company engaged FEECO, USA to conduct granulation testwork using growth agglomeration techniques to generate a spherical fertilizer granule from Lake Wells produced SOP. The tests found that an attractive, 2mm to 4mm spherical SOP granule can be readily produced with the desired strength and physical properties. 

For further information please visit www.saltlakepotash.com.au or contact:

Matt Syme/Clint McGhie

Salt Lake Potash Limited

Tel: +61 8 9322 6322

Jo Battershill

Salt Lake Potash Limited

Tel: +44 (0) 20 7478 3900

Colin Aaronson/Richard Tonthat/
Ben Roberts

Grant Thornton UK LLP (Nominated Adviser)

Tel: +44 (0) 20 7383 5100

Derrick Lee/Beth McKiernan

Cenkos Securities plc (Joint Broker)

Tel: +44 (0) 131 220 6939

Jerry Keen/Toby Gibbs

 

Shore Capital (Joint broker)

Tel: +44 (0) 20 7468 7967

 

 

Competent Persons Statement

The information in this announcement that relates to Exploration Results for Lake Ballard is based on information compiled by Mr Ben Jeuken, who is a member Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy and a member of the International Association of Hydrogeologists. Mr Jeuken is employed by Groundwater Science Pty Ltd, an independent consulting company. Mr Jeuken has sufficient experience, which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity, which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Mr Jeuken consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.

The information in this announcement that relates to Process Testwork Results is extracted from the report entitled ‘June 2018 Quarterly Report’ dated 30 July 2018. This announcement is available to view on www.saltlakepotash.com.au. The information in the original ASX Announcement that related to Process Testwork Results was based on, and fairly represents, information compiled by Mr Bryn Jones, BAppSc (Chem), MEng (Mining) who is a Fellow of the AusIMM, a ‘Recognised Professional Organisation’ (RPO) included in a list promulgated by the ASX from time to time. Mr Jones is a Director of Salt Lake Potash Limited. Mr Jones has sufficient experience, which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking, to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Salt Lake Potash Limited confirms that it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in the original market announcement. Salt Lake Potash Limited confirms that the form and context in which the Competent Person’s findings are presented have not been materially modified from the original market announcement.

The information in this announcement that relates to the Lake Way Mineral Resource is extracted from the report entitled ‘Scoping Study for Low Capex, High Margin Demonstration Plant at Lake Way’ dated 31 July 2018. This announcement is available to view on www.saltlakepotash.com.au. The information in the original ASX Announcement that related to Mineral Resources was based on, and fairly represents, information compiled by Mr Ben Jeuken, who is a member Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy and a member of the International Association of Hydrogeologists. Mr Jeuken is employed by Groundwater Science Pty Ltd, an independent consulting company. Mr Jeuken has sufficient experience, which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity, which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Salt Lake Potash Limited confirms that it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in the original market announcement and, in the case of estimates of Mineral Resources, that all material assumptions and technical parameters underpinning the estimates in the relevant market announcement continue to apply and have not materially changed. Salt Lake Potash Limited confirms that the form and context in which the Competent Person’s findings are presented have not been materially modified from the original market announcement. 

Production Target

The Lake Way Demonstration Plant Production Target stated in this report is based on the Company’s Scoping Study as released to the ASX on 31 July 2018. The information in relation to the Production Target that the Company is required to include in a public report in accordance with ASX Listing Rule 5.16 and 5.17 was included in the Company’s ASX Announcement released on 31 July 2018. The Company confirms that the material assumptions underpinning the Production Target referenced in the 31 July 2018 release continue to apply and have not materially changed.

 

Appendix 1 – Summary of Exploration and Mining Tenements

As at 30 September 2018, the Company holds interests in the following tenements:

 

Project

Status

Type of Change

License Number

Interest (%)
1-Jul-18

Interest (%)

30-Sep-18

Western Australia

Lake Wells

Central

Granted

E38/2710

100%

100%

South

Granted

E38/2821

100%

100%

North

Granted

E38/2824

100%

100%

Outer East

Granted

E38/3055

100%

100%

Single Block

Granted

E38/3056

100%

100%

Outer West

Granted

E38/3057

100%

100%

North West

Granted

E38/3124

100%

100%

West

Granted

L38/262

100%

100%

East

Granted

L38/263

100%

100%

South West

Granted

L38/264

100%

100%

South

Granted

L38/287

100%

100%

South Western

Granted

E38/3247

100%

100%

South

Granted

Granted

M38/1278

100%

100%

Lake Ballard

West

Granted

E29/912

100%

100%

East

Granted

E29/913

100%

100%

North

Granted

E29/948

100%

100%

South

Granted

E29/958

100%

100%

South East

Granted

E29/1011

100%

100%

South East

Granted

E29/1020

100%

100%

South East

Granted

E29/1021

100%

100%

South East

Granted

E29/1022

100%

100%

Lake Irwin

West

Granted

E37/1233

100%

100%

Central

Granted

E39/1892

100%

100%

East

Granted

E38/3087

100%

100%

North

Granted

E37/1261

100%

100%

Central East

Granted

E38/3113

100%

100%

South

Granted

E39/1955

100%

100%

North West

Granted

E37/1260

100%

100%

South West

Granted

E39/1956

100%

100%

Lake Minigwal

West

Granted

E39/1893

100%

100%

East

Granted

E39/1894

100%

100%

Central

Granted

E39/1962

100%

100%

Central East

Granted

E39/1963

100%

100%

South

Granted

E39/1964

100%

100%

South West

Granted

E39/1965

100%

100%

Lake Way

Central

Granted

E53/1878

100%

100%

South

Application

E53/1897

100%

100%

Lake Marmion

North

Granted

E29/1000

100%

100%

Central

Granted

E29/1001

100%

100%

South

Granted

E29/1002

100%

100%

West

Granted

E29/1005

100%

100%

Lake Noondie

North

Granted

Granted

E57/1062

100%

100%

Central

Granted

Granted

E57/1063

100%

100%

South

Granted

Granted

E57/1064

100%

100%

West

Granted

Granted

E57/1065

100%

100%

East

Granted

Granted

E36/932

100%

100%

Lake Barlee

North

Granted

Granted

E30/495

100%

100%

Central

Granted

E30/496

100%

100%

South

Granted

E77/2441

100%

100%

Lake Raeside

North

Granted

Granted

E37/1305

100%

100%

Lake Austin

North

Application

E21/205

100%

100%

West

Application

E21/206

100%

100%

East

Application

E58/529

100%

100%

South

Application

E58/530

100%

100%

South West

Application

E58/531

100%

100%

Northern Territory

Lake Lewis

South

Granted

EL 29787

100%

100%

North

Granted

EL 29903

100%

100%

 

Appendix 2 – Lake Ballard Brine Sample Analysis

HOLE ID

Easting

Northing

TDS
(by calc)

Na

Ca

Mg

K

SO4

Cl

Solution
SG
(g/cm3)

Solution
pH

Sample Depth

LBPT002

325658

6731602

62100

1540

4550

1430

7110

112550

1.1082

Composite Sample

LBPT003

308700

6730471

55100

1660

4160

1360

6600

93200

1.1017

Composite Sample

LBPT004

302738

6744250

87900

834

8230

2050

9600

157950

1.1536

Composite Sample

LBPT005

302212

6743736

89900

1060

6550

2010

8130

154900

1.16776

Composite Sample

LBPT006

302212

6743736

89900

1080

6630

2020

8010

154550

1.17008

Composite Sample

LBPT007

302212

6743736

94900

974

7520

2170

8790

160850

1.176

Composite Sample

LBPT008

302212

6743736

92900

983

7460

2080

8820

159250

1.17392

Composite Sample

LBPT009

325586

6731856

271950

85500

883

9590

1780

8460

161400

1.18316

7.12

Composite Sample

LBPT010

325447

6732100

275850

86100

999

8080

2020

8250

160500

1.17792

6.95

Composite Sample

LBPT012

326492

6732881

278500

87000

864

9680

2100

8790

162100

1.18092

6.82

Composite Sample

LBPT013

319001

6727398

192550

63700

1070

4800

1450

5250

112050

1.12904

7.01

Composite Sample

LBPT014

277821

6735449

233450

76300

1120

5350

1840

6900

134450

1.14844

6.86

Composite Sample

LBPT015

278070

6735444

230400

74600

1160

4980

1750

6300

133900

1.15236

6.87

Composite Sample

LBPT016

319201

6727398

260500

83100

1140

7000

1850

7680

153500

1.17264

6.71

Composite Sample

LBPT017

308680

6730653

189500

62700

1060

4730

1440

5160

110800

1.12984

6.95

Composite Sample

LBPT018

308660

6730898

260150

83800

1140

7050

1860

7620

153500

1.17496

6.68

Composite Sample

LBPT019

301117

6725240

193450

61900

858

5960

1170

8310

113250

1.13496

6.81

Composite Sample

LBPT020

301140

6725500

199850

65900

1190

5730

1160

8940

115550

1.1362

6.99

Composite Sample

LBPT021

302640

6727058

255200

83700

1010

6790

1600

9030

149650

1.17316

6.47

Composite Sample

LBPT022

302354

6727064

257600

83600

999

6910

1700

9000

150700

1.17012

6.55

Composite Sample

LBPT023

304245

6745381

219950

74400

1280

5470

1730

6690

129700

1.1418

6.85

Composite Sample

LBPT024

304000

6745229

218700

74100

1190

5300

1770

6240

128850

1.13956

7

Composite Sample

LBPT025

302690

6744000

240100

78600

1050

6410

1850

7710

141100

1.15652

6.92

Composite Sample

LBPT026

302763

6743750

266400

85400

950

7420

1840

8880

155950

1.16004

6.78

Composite Sample

LBPT027

304000

6745229

189300

63000

1440

1400

7200

107000

1.1224

Composite Sample

LBTT011

324848

6734075

263350

86300

938

8380

2130

7350

159000

1.17812

6.67

Composite Sample

LBTT014

324869

6734673

208200

69500

892

5700

1770

5220

123250

1.1396

7.04

Composite Sample

LBTT015

324875

6734875

118100

40300

735

3210

1040

3510

70750

1.08432

7.01

Composite Sample

LBTT015

324875

6734875

170000

55400

800

4570

1360

4680

96200

1.107544

6.83

Composite Sample

LBTT015

324875

6734875

246073

98788

473

6035.2

3030

22417

155972

1.191

6.3

Composite Sample

LBTT016

324648

6734154

207650

70500

1050

5820

1770

5490

126600

1.14124

6.9

Composite Sample

LBTT017

324447

6734155

233400

81500

1050

7100

2040

6210

145850

1.16256

6.89

Composite Sample

LBTT018

324250

6734155

230650

82300

1070

6980

2060

6150

142200

1.13408

6.8

Composite Sample

LBTT019

324047

6734155

246850

86200

1040

7840

2140

7110

154250

1.17032

6.76

Composite Sample

LBTT019

324047

6734155

275500

89500

1100

8200

2130

7245

156150

1.171568

6.67

Composite Sample

LBTT020

323847

6734155

240150

80500

1080

7300

2050

6450

147250

1.15928

6.7

Composite Sample

LBTT021

323650

6734155

213000

73600

1140

6200

1870

5910

131150

1.17644

6.73

Composite Sample

LBTT022

323447

6734155

195000

66700

1080

5540

1760

5400

119600

1.1366

6.89

Composite Sample

LBTT023

323249

6734154

200650

66400

1070

5570

1730

5310

120300

1.13696

6.92

Composite Sample

LBTT024

323047

6734155

202400

66600

1050

5570

1740

5310

122200

1.13928

6.9

Composite Sample

LBTT024

323047

6734155

211000

67800

1060

5660

1670

5490

119200

1.131568

6.76

Composite Sample

LBTT025

323838

6734261

247650

87900

1120

7470

2200

7260

151100

1.164628

Composite Sample

LBTT026

323839

6734212

232200

82200

1160

6750

2140

6510

144150

1.17144

Composite Sample

LBTT027

323845

6734107

241750

83200

1090

7030

2110

6720

145000

1.172956

Composite Sample

LBTT028

323847

6734054

240600

81100

1170

6880

2110

6450

145000

1.141296

Composite Sample

LBTT030

322735

6730202

261050

90400

1200

7900

2350

7620

159150

1.183848

Composite Sample

LBTT031

322531

6730201

266250

89600

1180

7830

2160

7470

160050

1.093476

Composite Sample

LBTT031

322531

6730201

286000

88800

925

8940

1910

9180

161900

1.179036

6.68

Composite Sample

LBTT038

321137

6730178

282000

88650

958.5

8675

1810

9120

156925

1.175404

6.8

Composite Sample

LBTT043

320136

6730166

262350

88300

1050

8040

2040

8580

155650

1.110616

Composite Sample

LBTT046

320132

6730100

185600

63400

1570

5380

1490

7650

109450

1.13928

Composite Sample

LBTT047

320136

6730206

223850

74500

1310

6440

1720

8250

129300

1.175924

Composite Sample

LBTT050

318601

6728705

162200

60100

1440

3940

1390

5820

96900

1.186168

Composite Sample

LBTT053

319201

6728663

261900

91900

1120

7830

2040

9030

154200

1.1396

Composite Sample

LBTT054

319406

6728628

260600

88700

1100

7590

1980

8550

154400

1.08432

Composite Sample

LBTT055

319603

6728608

261800

90600

1210

7230

2080

7860

153850

1.17812

Composite Sample

LBTT055

319603

6728608

270000

85900

1070

8000

1880

8790

153150

1.169972

6.74

Composite Sample

LBTT056

319804

6728588

259750

90700

1010

7990

1900

9360

152600

1.14124

Composite Sample

LBTT057

320003

6728568

271000

94200

1130

7670

2180

8250

159350

1.16256

Composite Sample

LBTT058

320209

6728546

260050

90000

1310

6450

2170

6480

153500

1.13408

Composite Sample

LBTT059

320404

6728525

251900

93600

1070

7800

2000

9000

157550

1.17032

Composite Sample

LBTT060

320604

6728506

246250

88700

1110

7770

1940

8640

153500

1.15928

Composite Sample

LBTT061

320800

6728486

241550

86400

1060

7830

1960

8790

152800

1.17644

Composite Sample

LBTT061

320800

6728486

270000

89200

1190

7270

1970

7560

151600

1.171012

6.72

Composite Sample

LBTT063

321301

6728433

247000

89800

1090

7860

2110

8370

156700

1.1366

Composite Sample

LBTT064

321502

6728412

247650

89600

1150

7390

2080

8130

157050

1.13696

Composite Sample

LBTT065

321703

6728389

238450

88600

1280

6860

2070

7560

150150

1.170068

Composite Sample

LBTT068

319222

6730192

276000

88300

1000

8320

1930

8730

155450

1.17294

6.69

Composite Sample

LBTT068

319222

6730192

244564

96474

446

6273

3038

26015

152114

1.19

6.3

Composite Sample

LBTT071

318604

6730200

255650

93500

1030

7970

2170

8910

159700

1.179528

Composite Sample

LBTT072

318364

6731106

264350

94500

1070

7650

2100

9090

160400

1.1766

Composite Sample

LBTT073

318513

6731235

252350

92100

1060

7280

2020

8580

155800

1.093348

Composite Sample

LBTT073

318513

6731235

323000

92600

638

14400

3290

12800

174600

1.198072

6.55

Composite Sample

LBTT074

318664

6731366

259700

88900

1170

7020

1940

8400

153700

1.1235

Composite Sample

LBTT075

318810

6731492

266500

94200

1130

7280

2050

8400

158450

1.1642

Composite Sample

LBTT076

318936

6731596

249350

90400

1260

6610

2010

7800

151400

1.096176

Composite Sample

LBTT076

318936

6731596

241450

86600

1230

6570

1970

7650

150300

1.09778

Composite Sample

LBTT077

319077

6731719

251450

93400

1060

7440

2000

8640

156350

1.195852

Composite Sample

LBTT078

319224

6731844

247050

90000

1090

7360

1900

8430

155100

1.1211

Composite Sample

LBTT079

319344

6731947

255450

90100

1020

7540

1930

8580

158800

1.1566

Composite Sample

LBTT080

319491

6732075

252550

88800

1020

7880

1920

9270

155250

1.1841

Composite Sample

LBTT081

319626

6732190

247750

87100

1100

7830

1870

9600

151200

1.1644

Composite Sample

LBTT082

319787

6732309

248350

87300

1020

8170

1900

10000

150700

1.183732

Composite Sample

LBTT082

319787

6732309

247200

88300

1020

8230

1890

9600

151050

1.147

Composite Sample

LBTT083

319908

6732429

263600

91700

935

8690

1940

10200

157950

1.131

Composite Sample

LBTT084

320056

6732555

268350

91000

892

9080

1960

10700

158300

1.1101

Composite Sample

LBTT087

320625

6733158

276000

85700

988

8680

2010

9000

152650

1.177

6.87

Composite Sample

LBTT087

316105

6731412

244534

98413

458

5802.1

3357

22360

156523

1.193

6.2

Composite Sample

LBTT099

316105

6731412

268000

95200

978

7950

1980

8340

162250

1.1844

7.37

Composite Sample

LBTT099

316051

6731653

270000

85000

988

7500

1900

8280

149550

1.179

6.62

Composite Sample

LBTT099

316051

6731653

239387

90960

981

7834.6

2012

8917

157625

1.178

6.5

Composite Sample

LBTT100

315997

6731866

266000

90700

996

7950

2040

8100

160300

1.1776

6.99

Composite Sample

LBTT100

315997

6731866

266000

90700

996

7950

2040

8100

160300

1.1776

6.99

Composite Sample

LBTT101

315815

6732626

263000

88200

1020

7950

2040

8100

158200

1.1804

6.78

Composite Sample

LBTT103

315764

6732827

269000

93600

987

8340

2050

8970

162100

1.1808

6.79

Composite Sample

LBTT105

315704

6733021

280000

98700

862

8850

2070

9390

168200

1.1856

6.74

Composite Sample

LBTT106

315603

6733390

263000

94000

1060

7890

2030

8820

158050

1.1768

6.85

Composite Sample

LBTT107

315538

6733588

273000

95000

918

8550

2050

9360

164900

1.1868

6.81

Composite Sample

LBTT109

315395

6733959

272000

96800

935

8230

2030

9060

163150

1.184

6.73

Composite Sample

LBTT110

315395

6733959

259000

91700

1070

7490

2010

7890

155400

1.1756

6.69

Composite Sample

LBTT112

315314

6734154

269000

92700

959

8200

2080

8580

161550

1.1816

6.64

Composite Sample

LBTT112

315314

6734154

288000

89900

968

8240

2100

8220

158100

1.1846

6.81

Composite Sample

LBTT113

315240

6734314

278000

96500

909

8790

2160

8880

166300

1.1888

6.72

Composite Sample

LBTT114

316375

6734039

276000

96500

949

8500

2160

8970

165250

1.1872

6.79

Composite Sample

LBTT115

316375

6734039

265000

91100

1020

8080

2190

8190

158900

1.1772

6.8

Composite Sample

LBTT115

316521

6734168

279000

90000

1040

8050

2130

8430

149400

1.1825

6.72

Composite Sample

LBTT116

316962

6734577

261000

91100

1030

7550

2130

7680

156300

1.1688

6.67

Composite Sample

LBTT119

317399

6734975

273000

95600

1140

8120

2230

8220

163850

1.1728

6.6

Composite Sample

LBTT123

317694

6732520

258000

92800

1050

7450

2070

8190

154700

1.1552

6.59

Composite Sample

LBTT124

317839

6735385

279000

84500

988

7570

1940

8040

158950

1.1819

6.82

Composite Sample

LBTT125

317986

6735519

251000

85100

1070

7390

2030

7920

150150

1.1488

6.61

Composite Sample

LBTT126

318137

6735660

243000

85600

1330

6520

1960

6900

144900

1.1464

6.66

Composite Sample

LBTT127

318282

6735794

246000

87100

1290

6830

2050

7080

146650

1.1408

6.73

Composite Sample

LBTT128

318428

6735928

243000

87100

1300

6710

2040

7140

145450

1.1532

6.77

Composite Sample

LBTT129

318428

6735928

256000

88000

1180

7110

2080

7410

151900

1.1524

6.68

Composite Sample

LBTT129

318428

6735928

271000

87400

1120

7450

1990

7770

154200

1.169028

6.75

Composite Sample

LBTT131

313153

6737408

163000

58000

996

4420

1310

5250

96700

1.0964

6.98

Composite Sample

LBTT132

313132

6737224

258000

91800

1170

6850

2060

7110

153150

1.154

6.65

Composite Sample

LBTT133

313105

6737027

269000

94600

1020

7470

2060

8400

158750

1.1632

6.64

Composite Sample

LBTT133

313105

6737027

287000

90400

950

7920

1990

8550

157750

1.1838

6.68

Composite Sample

LBTT134

313082

6736829

271000

94300

1030

7490

2100

7740

161050

1.1616

6.63

Composite Sample

LBTT135

313051

6736634

270000

93400

1020

7390

2110

8160

159800

1.1684

6.68

Composite Sample

LBTT136

313029

6736432

263000

91400

1020

7460

2040

8040

156450

1.1652

6.63

Composite Sample

LBTT137

313004

6736240

312000

96500

853

9450

2460

8940

170850

1.1934

6.72

Composite Sample

LBTT142

312874

6735244

257000

89700

959

7650

1970

8340

152600

1.156

6.65

Composite Sample

LBTT142

312874

6735244

287000

92600

963.5

8140

2020

8880

159275

1.1761

6.73

Composite Sample

LBTT143

312850

6735049

261000

91600

968

7570

1950

8910

154900

1.1588

6.61

Composite Sample

LBTT144

312822

6734850

272000

85000

1080

7260

1890

8580

148400

1.1759

6.82

Composite Sample

LBTT145

312797

6734660

238000

86100

1090

6030

1780

7080

140700

1.1436

6.67

Composite Sample

LBTT149

313340

6733847

253000

84700

993

6650

1720

7710

147700

1.164

7.02

Composite Sample

LBTT150

313323

6733652

257000

86700

1060

6950

1750

8520

148400

1.166

6.78

Composite Sample

LBTT156

313143

6732468

270000

89800

939

7900

1860

9060

156650

1.1764

6.62

Composite Sample

LBTT165

308329

6738318

290000

91300

968

7780

2010

8310

157050

1.1789

6.59

Composite Sample

LBTT166

307463

6735246

278000

90200

1030

7450

1910

8880

152450

1.1722

6.7

Composite Sample

LBTT166

307463

6735246

238197

90335

986

7403.7

1911

9177

157074

1.177

6.6

Composite Sample

LBTT169

307397

6731029

279000

88000

1010

7510

1850

8670

151100

1.1764

6.66

Composite Sample

LBTT169

307397

6731029

238546

91021

973

7519.6

1853

9493

157074

1.177

6.5

Composite Sample

LBTT170

304632

6730314

261000

84100

1190

6600

1750

7920

146150

1.1633

6.75

Composite Sample

LBTT171

300652

6730490

276000

88100

1200

6720

1900

7380

151250

1.1811

6.75

Composite Sample

LBTT172

303546

6733252

286000

91600

1000

7320

2010

8040

158950

1.1836

6.53

Composite Sample

LBTT176

300602

6734536

275000

88800

959

7310

1750

9420

150950

1.1739

6.59

Composite Sample

LBTT181

298362

6736492

278000

90200

933

7240

1730

9150

155200

1.2208

6.64

Composite Sample

Note: Results indicated in italix are duplicate samples

APPENDIX 3 – JORC TABLE ONE

Section 1: Sampling Techniques and Data

CriteriaCriteria

JORC Code explanationJORC Code explanation

CommentaryCommentary

Sampling techniques

Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels, random chips, or specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling.

Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used.

Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public Report.

In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has been done this would be relatively simple (eg ‘reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay’). In other cases more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (eg submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information.

Sampling involved the excavation of 38 test pits over the tenement area to a depth of 4mbgl or weathered basement whichever was encountered first. 

A brine sample and duplicate were taken from each test pit and trench for analysis.

Samples were taken manually by initially rinsing out the bottle with brine from the pit or trench and then placing the bottle in the test pit or trench and allowing it to fill.

Samples were analysed for K, Mg, Ca, Na, Cl, SO4, HCO3, NO3, pH, TDS and specific gravity.

Each test pit was geologically logged and a sample taken each 1m depth.

Drilling techniques

Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (eg core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc).

No drilling results are reported.  Test pits were dug with an excavator approximately 2m long x 1m wide x 4m deep.

 

Drill sample recovery

Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries and results assessed.

Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure representative nature of the samples. Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material.

Samples from the test pits were logged each bucket and a representative sample bagged.

100% of excavated sample was available for sampling.  The ability to see the bulk sample facilitated the selection of a representative sample.

There is no relationship between sample recovery and grade and no loss of material as a result of excavation.

Logging

Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies.

Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc) photography.

The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged.

The geological logging is sufficient for the purposes of identifying variations in sand/ clay and silt fraction within the top 4m.  For a brine abstraction project, the key parameters are the hydraulic conductivity and storativity of the host rock, which will be determined during test pumping of trenches.

The logging is qualitative.

The entire pit depth was logged in every case.

Sub-sampling techniques and sample preparation

If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core taken.

If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc and whether sampled wet or dry.

For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample preparation technique.

Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages to maximise representivity of samples.

Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in situ material collected, including for instance results for field duplicate/second-half sampling.

Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being sampled.

No drilling results are reported.

At all test pits brine samples were taken from the pit after 24hours or once the pit had filled with brine.  The brine samples taken from the pits are bulk samples which is an appropriate approach given the long-term abstraction technique of using many kilometres of trenches to abstract brine from the upper 4m.

All the samples taken were incorporated into a rigorous QA / QC programme in which Standards and Duplicates were taken. The samples were taken in sterile plastic bottles of 250ml capacity.

Excavated lake bed samples were sealed in plastic bags.  For all brine samples (original or check samples) the samples were labelled with the alphanumeric code Y8001, Y80002.

Lake bed samples were labelled with the test pit locator LYTT01, LYTT02 etc. and the depth from which they were taken.

Quality of assay data and laboratory tests

The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or total.

For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc, the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc.

Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (ie lack of bias) and precision have been established.

The brine samples were sent to Bureau Veritas Laboratories in Perth, WA with the duplicates being held by SLP.  Every 10th duplicate was sent to Intertek, an alternate laboratory for comparison purposes.

No laboratory analysis was undertaken with geophysical tools.

Soil samples and laboratory derived hydraulic conductivity, total porosity and drainable porosity samples were analysed by Core Laboratories in Perth WA.  All laboratories used are NATA certified.

Verification of sampling and assaying

The verification of significant intersections by either independent or alternative company personnel.

The use of twinned holes.

Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols.

Discuss any adjustment to assay data.

No drilling results reported.

All sampling and assaying is well documented and contained on SLP’s internal database.

No adjustments have been made to assay data

Location of data points

Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource estimation.

Specification of the grid system used.

Quality and adequacy of topographic control.

All coordinates were collected by handheld GPS.

The grid system is the Australian National Grid Zone MGA 51 (GDA 94).

The is no specific topographic control as the lake surface can essentially be considered flat.

Data spacing and distribution

Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results.

Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied.

Whether sample compositing has been applied.

The Lake Ballard area was calculated by digitising the lake surface and removing the area covered by the islands the approximate area is 626km2.  38 test pits were excavated over the lake surface resulting in 1 excavation per 16.47Km2. Which whilst it is a low density of investigation for a salt-lake it is sufficient to establish variations in brine content.

Sample compositing has not been applied.

Orientation of data in relation to geological structure

Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of possible structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the deposit type.

If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material.

There are no structural or geological controls with respect to sampling the lake bed sediments. 

Geological influence on the brine is limited to the aquifer parameters of the host rock, namely the hydraulic conductivity, drainable porosity and storativity.

Sample security

The measures taken to ensure sample security.

SLP field geologists were responsible for collecting, sealing and labelling brine and Shelby tube samples prior to shipping to the Perth labs and the SLP offices.  The security measures for the material and type of sampling at hand was appropriate.

Audits or reviews

The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data.

No audits or review of sampling techniques have been undertaken.  The brine chemistry data has been reviewed for charge balance.

 

Section 2: Reporting of Exploration Results

CriteriaCriteria

JORC Code explanationJORC Code explanation

Commentary

Mineral tenement and land tenure status

Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmental settings.

The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area.

The Lake Ballard project area is covered by Exploration licences E29/0912, E29/1011, E29/1022, E29/0958, E29/1021, E29/0948, E29/1020 and E29/0913.

All tenements are held by Piper Preston Pty Ltd, a wholly owned subsidiary of Salt Lake Potash Limited.

Exploration done by other parties

Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties.

No previous work has been carried out on Lake Ballard for potash exploration.

Geology

Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation.

The deposit is a salt-lake brine deposit.

The lake setting is typical of a Western Australian palaeovalley environment. Ancient hydrological systems have incised palaeovalleys into Archaean basement rocks, which were then infilled by Tertiary-aged sediments typically comprising a coarse-grained fluvial basal sand overlaid by palaeovalley clay with some coarser grained interbeds. The clay is overlaid by recent Cainozoic material including lacustrine sediment, calcrete, evaporite and aeolian deposits. 

Drill hole Information

A summary of all information material to the understanding of the exploration results including a tabulation of the following information for all Material drill holes:

o   easting and northing of the drill hole collar

o   elevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevation above sea level in metres) of the drill hole collar

o   dip and azimuth of the hole

o   down hole length and interception depth

o   hole length.

If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that the information is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from the understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly explain why this is the case.

No drill results are reported. 

38 test pits and 8 trenches were excavated on the lake surface.

All test pit locations are presented in the report.

Data aggregation methods

In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques, maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (eg cutting of high grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material and should be stated.

Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high grade results and longer lengths of low grade results, the procedure used for such aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of such aggregations should be shown in detail.

The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values should be clearly stated.

Within the salt-lake extent no low-grade cut-off or high-grade capping has been implemented due to the consistent nature of the brine assay data.

Relationship between mineralisation widths and intercept lengths

These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of Exploration Results.

If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is known, its nature should be reported.

If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there should be a clear statement to this effect (eg ‘down hole length, true width not known’).

The chemical analysis from each of the test pits has shown the that the brine resource is consistent and continuous through the full thickness of the Lake Playa sediments unit. The unit is flat lying all test pits were excavated into the lake sediments to a depth of 4m or basement, the intersected depth is equivalent to the vertical depth and the thickness of mineralisation.

 

Diagrams

Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of intercepts should be included for any significant discovery being reported These should include, but not be limited to a plan view of drill hole collar locations and appropriate sectional views.

All location maps and sections are contained within the body of the report.

Balanced reporting

Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not practicable, representative reporting of both low and high grades and/or widths should be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of Exploration Results.

A summary of the average of all brine results has been included in the body of the report.

The total and drainable porosity results for 4 test pits where Shelby tube insitu samples were taken are included in the body of the report.

Other substantive exploration data

Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be reported including (but not limited to): geological observations; geophysical survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples – size and method of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock characteristics; potential deleterious or contaminating substances.

All material exploration data available at the time of writing has been reported.

Further work

The nature and scale of planned further work (eg tests for lateral extensions or depth extensions or large-scale step-out drilling).

Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions, including the main geological interpretations and future drilling areas, provided this information is not commercially sensitive.

Trench tests will commence and be concluded in Q2, an auger drilling programme will be completed and the results reported in Q2.

 

 

This information is provided by RNS, the news service of the London Stock Exchange. RNS is approved by the Financial Conduct Authority to act as a Primary Information Provider in the United Kingdom. Terms and conditions relating to the use and distribution of this information may apply. For further information, please contact rns@lseg.com or visit www.rns.com.

END

Appendix 5B

Mining exploration entity and oil and gas exploration entity quarterly report

Introduced 01/07/96  Origin Appendix 8  Amended 01/07/97, 01/07/98, 30/09/01, 01/06/10, 17/12/10, 01/05/13, 01/09/16

Name of entity

Salt Lake Potash Limited

ABN

Quarter ended (“current quarter”)

98 117 085 748

30 September 2018

Consolidated statement of cash flows

Current quarter $A’000

Year to date

 (3 months)
$A’000

1.

Cash flows from operating activities

1.1

Receipts from customers

1.2

Payments for

(1,633)

(1,633)

(a)   exploration & evaluation

(b)   development

(c)   production

(d)   staff costs

(610)

(610)

(e)   administration and corporate costs

(182)

(182)

1.3

Dividends received (see note 3)

1.4

Interest received

34

34

1.5

Interest and other costs of finance paid

1.6

Income taxes paid

1.7

Research and development refunds

1.8

Other (provide details if material)
– Business Development

(224)

(224)

1.9

Net cash from / (used in) operating activities

(2,615)

(2,615)

2.

Cash flows from investing activities

(122)

(122)

2.1

Payments to acquire:

(a)   property, plant and equipment

(b)   tenements (see item 10)

(c)   investments

(d)   other non-current assets

2.2

Proceeds from the disposal of:

(a)   property, plant and equipment

(b)   tenements (see item 10)

(c)   investments

(d)   other non-current assets

2.3

Cash flows from loans to other entities

2.4

Dividends received (see note 3)

2.5

Other (provide details if material)

2.6

Net cash from / (used in) investing activities

(122)

(122)

3.

Cash flows from financing activities

3.1

Proceeds from issues of shares

3.2

Proceeds from issue of convertible notes

3.3

Proceeds from exercise of share options

3.4

Transaction costs related to issues of shares, convertible notes or options

3.5

Proceeds from borrowings

3.6

Repayment of borrowings

3.7

Transaction costs related to loans and borrowings

3.8

Dividends paid

3.9

Other (provide details if material)

3.10

Net cash from / (used in) financing activities

4.

Net increase / (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents for the period

5,709

5,709

4.1

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

4.2

Net cash from / (used in) operating activities (item 1.9 above)

(2,615)

(2,615)

4.3

Net cash from / (used in) investing activities (item 2.6 above)

(122)

(122)

4.4

Net cash from / (used in) financing activities (item 3.10 above)

4.5

Effect of movement in exchange rates on cash held

4.6

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

2,972

2,972

5.

Reconciliation of cash and cash equivalents
at the end of the quarter (as shown in the consolidated statement of cash flows) to the related items in the accounts

Current quarter
$A’000

Previous quarter
$A’000

5.1

Bank balances

1,259

1,596

5.2

Call deposits

1,713

4,113

5.3

Bank overdrafts

5.4

Other (provide details)

5.5

Cash and cash equivalents at end of quarter (should equal item 4.6 above)

2,972

5,709

6.

Payments to directors of the entity and their associates

Current quarter
$A’000

6.1

Aggregate amount of payments to these parties included in item 1.2

(127)

6.2

Aggregate amount of cash flow from loans to these parties included in item 2.3

6.3

Include below any explanation necessary to understand the transactions included in items 6.1 and 6.2

Payments include director and consulting fees, superannuation and provision of corporate, administration services, and a fully serviced office.

7.

Payments to related entities of the entity and their associates

Current quarter
$A’000

7.1

Aggregate amount of payments to these parties included in item 1.2

7.2

Aggregate amount of cash flow from loans to these parties included in item 2.3

7.3

Include below any explanation necessary to understand the transactions included in items 7.1 and 7.2

Not applicable.

8.

Financing facilities available
Add notes as necessary for an understanding of the position

Total facility amount at quarter end
$A’000

Amount drawn at quarter end
$A’000

8.1

Loan facilities

8.2

Credit standby arrangements

8.3

Other (please specify)

8.4

Include below a description of each facility above, including the lender, interest rate and whether it is secured or unsecured. If any additional facilities have been entered into or are proposed to be entered into after quarter end, include details of those facilities as well.

Not applicable

9.

Estimated cash outflows for next quarter

$A’000

9.1

Exploration and evaluation

950

9.2

Development

9.3

Production

9.4

Staff costs

500

9.5

Administration and corporate costs

150

9.6

Other (provide details if material)
– Business Development

150

9.7

Total estimated cash outflows

1,750

10.

Changes in tenements
(items 2.1(b) and 2.2(b) above)

Tenement reference and location

Nature of interest

Interest at beginning of quarter

Interest at end of quarter

10.1

Interests in mining tenements and petroleum tenements lapsed, relinquished or reduced

Refer to Appendix 1

10.2

Interests in mining tenements and petroleum tenements acquired or increased

Compliance statement

1        This statement has been prepared in accordance with accounting standards and policies which comply with Listing Rule 19.11A.

2        This statement gives a true and fair view of the matters disclosed.

Sign here:         ……………………………………………………                        Date: 31 October 2018

(Director/Company secretary)

Print name:       Clint McGhie

Notes

1.       The quarterly report provides a basis for informing the market how the entity’s activities have been financed for the past quarter and the effect on its cash position. An entity that wishes to disclose additional information is encouraged to do so, in a note or notes included in or attached to this report.

2.       If this quarterly report has been prepared in accordance with Australian Accounting Standards, the definitions in, and provisions of, AASB 6: Exploration for and Evaluation of Mineral Resources and AASB 107: Statement of Cash Flows apply to this report. If this quarterly report has been prepared in accordance with other accounting standards agreed by ASX pursuant to Listing Rule 19.11A, the corresponding equivalent standards apply to this report.

3.       Dividends received may be classified either as cash flows from operating activities or cash flows from investing activities, depending on the accounting policy of the entity.

This information is provided by RNS, the news service of the London Stock Exchange. RNS is approved by the Financial Conduct Authority to act as a Primary Information Provider in the United Kingdom. Terms and conditions relating to the use and distribution of this information may apply. For further information, please contact rns@lseg.com or visit www.rns.com.

END

I would like to receive Brand Communications updates and news...
Free Stock Updates & News
I agree to have my personal information transfered to MailChimp ( more information )
Join over 3.000 visitors who are receiving our newsletter and learn how to optimize your blog for search engines, find free traffic, and monetize your website.
We hate spam. Your email address will not be sold or shared with anyone else.