Home » Posts tagged 'geological'

Tag Archives: geological

#GRX GreenX Metals Ltd – Quarterly Activities Report December 2024

GreenX Metals Limited (ASX:GRX, LSE:GRX) (GreenX or the Company) is pleased to present its Quarterly Activities Report for the period during and subsequent to 31 December 2024.

HIGHLIGHTS

·    German Project – Tannenberg Copper Project

o BHP Xplor will provide GreenX with approximately US$500,000 in non-dilutive funding to support and accelerate its exploration plans at the Tannenberg Copper Project (Tannenberg) during the 6-month period of the program.

o BHP Xplor is expected to accelerate the geological concept build-out and exploration timeframe at Tannenberg.

·    Greenland Projects

o The Company notes the recent U.S. strategic interest in Greenland including Greenland Prime Minister publicly stating that he is open to discussions with the U.S.

o Greenland is endowed with an abundance of critical minerals which are essential for batteries, technology and defence.

o The Company is well placed to capitalise on the increased interest in Greenland with two large scale, strategic projects prospective for critical minerals located in Greenland.

o Enhanced project and technical team for GreenX, with the appointment of inhouse specialist geologist based in Scandinavia to re-evaluate and re-design exploration programs in Greenland.

Eleonore North Project

o During the quarter, GreenX received outstanding antimony results at the Eleonore North project in Greenland (Eleonore North or ELN).

o Antimony price now US$40,000/t from historical prices of ~US$5,000 to 10,000/t.

o Critical mineral crisis escalating – China has now restricted export of critical and strategic antimony, graphite, gallium, germanium, tungsten, titanium and rare earths.

o Antimony and tungsten have been designated as “Critical Minerals” by the U.S. and the EU, with NATO designating tungsten as defence-critical for the Allied defence industry.

o Historical results from fieldwork at ELN include grab samples from outcropping mineralised veins with individual specimens grading up to 23% antimony (Sb), and other samples up to 4g/t gold (Au).

o Antimony mineralisation has been identified along a ~4km trend in veins and structures, that broadly aligns with previously identified gold veining at surface within a 15km trend.

o Review and verification of new historical data, including radiometric data, at ELN underway with further updates to be made in the coming weeks.

Arctic Rift Copper Project

o The Company is targeting large scale copper in multiple settings across a 5,774 km2 licence at the Arctic Rift Copper Project (ARC).

o With the new enhanced technical team now in place, further analysis on remote-sensing options underway which aims to improve understanding of the known copper mineralisation and to plan the next exploration program at the project.

·    Arbitration Award

Classification: 2.2 This announcement contains inside information

ENQUIRIES

 

Ben Stoikovich
Chief Executive Officer

+44 207 478 3900

 

 

TANNENBERG COPPER PROJECT (GERMANY)

During the quarter, the Company announced that following a rigorous selection process, it has been selected as one of eight exploration companies to participate in BHP’s 2025 Xplor program in relation to Tannenberg.

The Xplor program was established in 2023 to support promising minerals explorers to accelerate the exploration needed to support the energy transition. Over a six-month program period, BHP Xplor targets development of technical, business and operational excellence within participating companies.

As a 2025 BHP Xplor cohort company, GreenX will receive a one-off, non-dilutive grant of up to US$500,000, and in-kind services, mentorship, and networking opportunities with BHP and other industry experts and investors.

It is expected GreenX’s participation in Xplor will expedite the build-out of geological concepts and the exploration timeframe at Tannenberg. GreenX intends to use the grant to conduct geophysics programs over the Tannenberg licence area.

A map of germany with different cities Description automatically generated

Figure 1: Tannenberg is located in the industrial centre of Europe

GREENLAND PROJECTS

Eleonore North Project

During the quarter, GreenX announced that high grade antimony mineralisation had been identified at its Eleonore North project in Greenland, based on historical results recently released by the Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland (GEUS). The historical results indicate the potential for a high-grade antimony-gold mineral system at ELN. Antimony prices have been on a rapid uptrend since China announced antimony export controls from 15 September 2024, with antimony prices in the US having rocketed to over US$40,000/t from US$18,300/t2.

A map of a geothermal area Description automatically generated

Figure 2: Newly released GEUS assay results show evidence for high-grade antimony and gold mineralisation above the interpreted Noa Pluton.

Previously reported historical data confirmed the presence of gold and high-grade antimony in outcropping veins at ELN including:

·      14m long chip sample grading 7.2% Sb and 0.53g/t Au3

·      40 m chip line with a length weighed average of 0.78g/t Au3

Significantly, GEUS geologist’s identified stibnite (Sb2S3) as the antimony mineral. Stibnite is well-understood and the predominant ore mineral for commercial antimony production.

Antimony is designated a Critical Raw Material by both the EU and the US, with China being the world’s major antimony ore producer and major exporter of refined antimony oxides and metallic antimony.

Global strategic interest in antimony has significantly increased in 2024 due to several factors:

·      China controls ~50% of global antimony mining, most downstream processing and 32% of global resources according to the Lowy Institute.

·      China’s recent export ban on antimony, effective from 15 September 2024, has caused market disruption4.

·      Antimony is a crucial material in the defence supply chain, used in various military applications including ammunition, flame retardants, and smart weaponry.

·      Antimony is essential in renewable energy technologies including more-energy-efficient solar panel glass and in preventing thermal runaway in batteries.

The antimony market is expected to grow by 65% between 2024 and 20325. However, the supply side, declining antimony grades and depleting resources for existing mines are becoming increasingly relevant.

To aid the Company’s exploration targeting and fieldwork planning for ELN, GreenX’s technical team intend to locate, analyse, and study further historical samples and data within GEUS’s archives.

ANTIMONY RESULTS FROM NEWLY PUBLISHED GEOLOGICAL SURVEY ARCHIVE MATERIAL

GEUS’s archives host an extensive collection of rock samples (with and without assays), maps, as well as government and company reports going back many decades. A sub-set of the archive material is available in digital format. GEUS is continuously digitising and publishing its archive material. The newly released data covers 2008 field work at the Noa Dal valley within the Company’s ELN project. Government geologists collected mineralised samples from outcropping veins and scree near to the interpreted Noa Pluton. Selected highlights are presented in Table 1 below.

Table 1: Selected antimony and gold results from 2008 GEUS fieldwork

Sample #

Sb (%)

Au (g/t)

Field description

469506

23.40

0.00

Quartz vein with stibnite. Sample from boulder or scree

496901

22.20

0.44

Massive stibnite from mineralised zone

496918

15.10

0.54

Quartz vein + galena + chalcopyrite

469504

6.65

0.83

Shale with stibnite

496912

0.10

4.10

Clay alteration: hanging wall

496904

0.11

4.70

Clay alteration: footwall

496910

0.04

2.20

Intense clay alteration

These newly released results conform with previously released historical results from the Noa Dal area (previously reported in ASX announcement dated 10 July 2023).

GEOLOGICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF ANTIMONY

GreenX is targeting Reduced Intrusion-related Gold Systems (RIRGS) at ELN. The hypothesised blind-to-the-surface Noa Pluton forms the basis for the RIRGS exploration model. Antimony-gold veins at surface were considered to be supporting evidence for RIRGS at ELN. With the favourable shift in the antimony market, the outcropping veins have become a potentially viable and attractive target.

The antimony-gold mineralisation at ELN could be analogous to Perpetua Resources’ Stibnite Gold Project in Idaho, USA. There, RIRGS and orogenic gold mineralisation styles overprint each other. Prior to the RIRGS model at ELN, the gold-bearing veins at Noa Dal were thought to be of orogenic origin. It is relatively common in gold deposits which are proximal to intrusions to feature characteristics of RIRGS and orogenic gold mineralisation styles.   

 The scale and potential of the antimony-gold veins will be evaluated with a follow-up investigation in the next phase of fieldwork.

GEUS is in the process of releasing results from regional mapping and sampling surveys from field seasons in 2022 and 2023 across East Greenland. GreenX plans to use the soon-to-be-released data as part of ongoing evaluation of the antimony and gold potential at ELN and the region.

 Given recent developments in the antimony market, GreenX’s exploration strategy at the ELN project in East Greenland will continue with a renewed focus on the known Sb-Au mineral systems at the Noa pluton.

GreenX has been able to access further historical data for ELN with a review currently underway. Following completion of this review further updates will be made, expected in the coming weeks.

Arctic Rift Copper Project

The Arctic Rift Copper Project (ARC) in Greenland is an exploration joint venture between GreenX and Greenfields Pty Ltd (Greenfields). GreenX can earn-in up to 80% in ARC with the Company currently owning a 51% interest in the project. The project is targeting large scale copper in multiple settings across a 5,774 km2 Special Exploration Licence in eastern North Greenland. The area has been historically underexplored yet is prospective for copper, forming part of the newly identified Kiffaanngissuseq metallogenic province.

The results of work program announced previously have demonstrated the high-grade nature of the known copper sulphide mineralisation and wider copper mineralization in fault hosted Black Earth zones and adjacent sandstone units. The exact position of a native copper fissure at the Neergaard Dal prospect was also identified.

The Company is in the process of analysing further remote-sensing options for ARC, which  would be used to enhance current understanding of the known copper sulphide mineralisation and refine plans for the next exploration program.

SUCCESSFUL ARBITRATION OUTCOME IN DISPUTE WITH POLISH GOVERNMENT

In October 2024, GreenX reported a successful outcome of the international arbitration claims (Claim) against Republic of Poland (Poland or Respondent) under both the BIT and the ECT (together the Treaties).

The Company was awarded:

·      approximately £252m (A$490m / PLN1.3bn) in compensation by the Tribunal under the BIT (BIT Award) which includes interest compounded at SONIA plus one percentage point (+1%) compounded annually from 31 December 2019 to the date of the award (7 October 2024). 

·      approximately £183m (A$355m / PLN 941m) in compensation by the Tribunal under the ECT (ECT Award), which includes interest compounded at the SONIA overnight rate +1% compounded annually from 31 December 2019. Interest will continue to accrue at SONIA +1% compounded annually until full and final payment by the Respondent.

·      Additional Interest of approximately £4 million (A$8 million / PLN 20 million) has accrued since the award to end of January 2025 and will continue to compound annually until full and final payment by the Respondent.

·      Interest income of ~£14 million (A$28 million / PLN 70 million) per annum is currently accruing to GreenX. However, interest expense of only ~£2.7 million (A$5.3 million / PLN 13.5 million) per annum is accruing on the US$11.3 million of litigation funding utilised.

·      Both Awards are subject to any payments made by the Respondent to the Claimant in the other arbitration such that the Claimant is not entitled to double compensation i.e., any amount paid by Poland in one arbitration (i.e., ECT) is set off against Poland’s liability in the other arbitration (i.e., BIT).

The compensation is denominated in British pound sterling. No hedging is in place for the compensation and accordingly is subject to fluctuations in foreign currency.

During the quarter, the Polish Prime Minister, Mr Donald Tusk, stated in a press conference that:

“The case is rather hopeless, because a lost arbitration is a lost arbitration. We have two big cases on our shoulders. The PiS government blew this issue.

The Australians, as you know, were promised that their mine would be built there. For years they were misled and later the commitment was withdrawn. It was quite obvious that they would go to arbitration, and it was rather obvious that they would win this arbitration.

Speaking frankly, I would most likely, and I cannot exclude that it will go this way, to find the person directly responsible for Poland now having to pay well over a billion zloty if we do not find a legal solution – which I think has very little probability to set aside the award in this arbitration. So, speaking the truth, I will expect my officers to inform the public in the coming days who made a decision or refrained from making a decision with the consequence of these gigantic losses, that is the compensation that we as the Polish State must pay to the Australians.” 1

Since the award was made, Poland has lodged a request to set-aside the award with the courts of England and Wales in relation to the BIT Award and the courts of Singapore in relation to the ECT Award. Poland is challenging jurisdictional aspects of both awards and alleging procedural unfairness, including in the Tribunal’s decision on damages.

The threshold to succeed on a set-aside motion in either the English or Singapore courts is very high, with the courts rejecting set-aside applications in the vast majority of cases.

It is important to note that a “set-aside” motion is different from a general “appeal” since a set-aside motion can in general only relate to a lack of jurisdiction on the part of the Tribunal or procedural unfairness. Under both set-aside motions, the actual merits of the Claim cannot be revisited by the courts.

The Company is strongly defending the set-aside motions and will update the market, if required, in line with its continuous disclosure requirements.

All of GreenX’s costs associated with the Claim were funded on a limited basis from Litigation Capital Management (LCM). To date, GreenX has drawn down US$11.3 million from LCM. Once the award compensation is received from Poland, LCM will be entitled to be paid back the US$11.3 million, a multiple of five times of the US$11.3 million and from 1 January 2025, interest on the US$11.3 million at a rate of 30% per annum, compounding monthly (which equates to interest of approximately US$3.4 million (£2.7 million / A$5.3 million / PLN 13.5 million) per annum).

Further information on the Claim and awards can be found in the Company’s announcements dated 8 October 2024, 17 October 2024, 11 November 2024 and 22 January 2025.

 

CORPORATE

At 31 December 2024, GreenX had a cash balance of A$5 million and an additional US$0.5 million for exploration activities dedicated for Tannenberg from the BHP Xplor program.

 

-ENDS-

 

Forward Looking Statements

This release may include forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based on GreenX’s expectations and beliefs concerning future events. Forward looking statements are necessarily subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are outside the control of GreenX, which could cause actual results to differ materially from such statements. GreenX makes no undertaking to subsequently update or revise the forward-looking statements made in this release, to reflect the circumstances or events after the date of that release.

Competent Persons Statement

The information in this report that relates to exploration results were extracted from the ASX announcements dated 15 July 2024, 2 August 2024 and 27 November 2024 which are available to view at www.greenxmetals.com.

GreenX confirms that (a) it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in the original announcement; (b) all material assumptions and technical parameters underpinning the content in the relevant announcement continue to apply and have not materially changed; and (c) the form and context in which the Competent Person’s findings are presented have not been materially modified from the original announcement

The information contained within this announcement is deemed by the Company to constitute inside information as stipulated under the Market Abuse Regulations (EU) No. 596/2014 as it forms part of UK domestic law by virtue of the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 (‘MAR’). Upon the publication of this announcement via Regulatory Information Service (‘RIS’), this inside information is now considered to be in the public domain.

Sources:

1 https://www.gov.pl/web/premier/wsparcie-dla-rodzicow-wczesniakow (refer to the video (29:45-32:00)),

 https://biznes.pap.pl/wiadomosci/firmy/unikniecie-wyplaty-odszkodowania-wynikajacego-z-arbitrazu-greenx-malo

2 SP Angel 22/11/24 & asianmetals.com.

3 Previously reported – refer to ASX announcement dated 10 July 2023.

4 https://chemical.chemlinked.com/news/chemical-news/china-restricts-export-of-antimony-and-related-products.

5 https://www.fortunebusinessinsights.com/antimony-market-104295.

 

 

APPENDIX 1: TENEMENT INFORMATION

 

As at 31 December 2024, the Company has an interest in the following tenements:

Location

Tenement

Percentage
Interest

Status

Tenement Type

Germany

Tannenberg

-1

Granted

Exploration Licence

Greenland

Arctic Rift Copper project (Licence No. 2021-07 MEL-S)

512

Granted

Exploration Licence

Greenland

Eleonore North gold project
(Licence No’s 2018-19 and 2023-39)

100

Granted

Exploration Licence

Notes:

1        In August 2024, the Company announced that it had entered into an earn-in agreement for Tanneberg through which GreenX can earn a 90% interest in the project. As at the date of this report, the Company held no beneficial interest in Tannenberg, other than through the Tannenberg earn-in agreement.

2        In October 2021, the Company announced that it had entered into an earn-in agreement with Greenfields to acquire an interest of up to 80% in ARC. Having met the spend requirement, the Company has been issued with its initial 51% interest in ARC.

 

Appendix 2: Related Party Payments

 

During the quarter ended 31 December 2024, the Company made payments of A$222,000 to related parties and their associates. These payments relate to existing remuneration arrangements (director fees, consulting fees and superannuation of A$144,000 and the provision of a serviced office and company secretarial and administration services of A$78,000).

 

Appendix 3: Exploration and Mining Expenditure

 

During the quarter ended 31 December 2024, the Company made the following payments in relation to exploration activities:

 

Activity

A$000

Germany (Tannenberg)

Permitting related costs

1

Personnel costs (geology team)

116

Sub-total

117

 

Greenland (Eleonore North and ARC)

Permitting related costs

12

Personnel costs (geology team)

28

Other (data review, geoimagery, etc)

10

Sub-total

50

Total as reported in the Appendix 5B (item 1.2(a) and 2.1(d))

167

 

There were no mining or production activities and expenses incurred during the quarter ended 31 December 2024.

 

Appendix 5B

Mining exploration entity or oil and gas exploration entity
quarterly cash flow report

Name of entity

GreenX Metals Limited

ABN

Quarter ended (“current quarter”)

23 008 677 852

31 December 2024

 

Consolidated statement of cash flows

Current quarter
$A’000

Year to date
(6 months)
$A’000

1.

Cash flows from operating activities

1.1

Receipts from customers

1.2

Payments for

(50)

(156)

(a)   exploration & evaluation

(b)   development

(c)   production

(d)   staff costs

(371)

(735)

(e)   administration and corporate costs

(201)

(528)

1.3

Dividends received (see note 3)

1.4

Interest received

65

141

1.5

Interest and other costs of finance paid

1.6

Income taxes paid

1.7

Government grants and tax incentives

1.8

Other (provide details if material)

(a)    Business Development

(b)    Arbitration related expenses

(c)    Occupancy

 

(159)

(232)

 

(349)

(1)

(459)

1.9

Net cash from / (used in) operating activities

(948)

(2,087)

2.

Cash flows from investing activities

2.1

Payments to acquire or for:

(a)   Entities

(b)   Tenements

(c)   property, plant and equipment

(3)

(3)

(d)   exploration & evaluation

(117)

(129)

(e)   investments

(f)    other non-current assets

2.2

Proceeds from the disposal of:

(a)   entities

(b)   tenements

(c)   property, plant and equipment

(d)   investments

(e)   other non-current assets

2.3

Cash flows from loans to other entities

2.4

Dividends received (see note 3)

2.5

Other (provide details if material)

2.6

Net cash from / (used in) investing activities

(120)

(132)

3.

Cash flows from financing activities

3.1

Proceeds from issues of equity securities (excluding convertible debt securities)

3.2

Proceeds from issue of convertible debt securities

3.3

Proceeds from exercise of options

3.4

Transaction costs related to issues of equity securities or convertible debt securities

(34)

(111)

3.5

Proceeds from borrowings

3.6

Repayment of borrowings

3.7

Transaction costs related to loans and borrowings

3.8

Dividends paid

3.9

Other (provide details if material)

3.10

Net cash from / (used in) financing activities

(34)

(111)

4.

Net increase / (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents for the period

4.1

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

5,933

7,163

4.2

Net cash from / (used in) operating activities (item 1.9 above)

(948)

(2,087)

4.3

Net cash from / (used in) investing activities (item 2.6 above)

(120)

(132)

4.4

Net cash from / (used in) financing activities (item 3.10 above)

(34)

(111)

4.5

Effect of movement in exchange rates on cash held

(1)

(3)

4.6

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

4,830

4,830

 

5.

Reconciliation of cash and cash equivalents
at the end of the quarter (as shown in the consolidated statement of cash flows) to the related items in the accounts

Current quarter
$A’000

Previous quarter
$A’000

5.1

Bank balances

1,830

2,433

5.2

Call deposits

3,000

3,500

5.3

Bank overdrafts

5.4

Other (provide details)

5.5

Cash and cash equivalents at end of quarter (should equal item 4.6 above)

4,830

5,933

 

6.

Payments to related parties of the entity and their associates

Current quarter
$A’000

6.1

Aggregate amount of payments to related parties and their associates included in item 1

(222)

6.2

Aggregate amount of payments to related parties and their associates included in item 2

Note: if any amounts are shown in items 6.1 or 6.2, your quarterly activity report must include a description of, and an explanation for, such payments.

 

7.

Financing facilities
Note: the term “facility’ includes all forms of financing arrangements available to the entity.

Add notes as necessary for an understanding of the sources of finance available to the entity.

Total facility amount at quarter end
$A’000


Amount drawn at quarter end
$A’000

7.1

Loan facilities

19,880*

18,160

7.2

Credit standby arrangements

7.3

Other (please specify)

808^

7.4

Total financing facilities

20,688*

18,160

 

7.5

Unused financing facilities available at quarter end

2,528

7.6

Include in the box below a description of each facility above, including the lender, interest rate, maturity date and whether it is secured or unsecured. If any additional financing facilities have been entered into or are proposed to be entered into after quarter end, include a note providing details of those facilities as well.

On 30 June 2020, the Company executed a Litigation Funding Agreement (LFA) for US$12.3 million (*now worth A$19.8 million with the movement of the A$ compared to the $US) with LCM Funding UK Limited a subsidiary of Litigation Capital Management Limited (LCM), to pursue the damages Claim in relation to the investment dispute between GreenX and Poland). To date, GreenX has drawn down US$11.2 million (A$18.2 million) (Outstanding Funding). In accordance with the terms of the LFA, once the compensation is received, LCM is entitled to be paid the Outstanding Funding, a multiple of five times the Outstanding Funding (based on the period since entering into the LFA) and from 1 January 2025, interest on the Outstanding Funding at a rate of 30% per annum, compounding monthly.

^Subsequent to the end of the quarter, the Company announced that it had been selected to participate in BHP’s 2025 Xplor program which will provide the Company with US$0.5 million (A$0.8 million) in non-dilutive funding to support and accelerate its exploration plans at the Tannenberg Copper Project.

 

8.

Estimated cash available for future operating activities

$A’000

8.1

Net cash from / (used in) operating activities (item 1.9)

(948)

8.2

(Payments for exploration & evaluation classified as investing activities) (item 2.1(d))

(117)

8.3

Total relevant outgoings (item 8.1 + item 8.2)

(1,065)

8.4

Cash and cash equivalents at quarter end (item 4.6)

4,830

8.5

Unused finance facilities available at quarter end (item 7.5)

2,528

8.6

Total available funding (item 8.4 + item 8.5)

7,358

8.7

Estimated quarters of funding available (item 8.6 divided by item 8.3)

7

Note: if the entity has reported positive relevant outgoings (ie a net cash inflow) in item 8.3, answer item 8.7 as “N/A”. Otherwise, a figure for the estimated quarters of funding available must be included in item 8.7.

8.8

If item 8.7 is less than 2 quarters, please provide answers to the following questions:

8.8.1     Does the entity expect that it will continue to have the current level of net operating cash flows for the time being and, if not, why not?

Answer: Not applicable

8.8.2     Has the entity taken any steps, or does it propose to take any steps, to raise further cash to fund its operations and, if so, what are those steps and how likely does it believe that they will be successful?

Answer: Not applicable

8.8.3     Does the entity expect to be able to continue its operations and to meet its business objectives and, if so, on what basis?

Answer: Not applicable

Note: where item 8.7 is less than 2 quarters, all of questions 8.8.1, 8.8.2 and 8.8.3 above must be answered.

 

Compliance statement

1        This statement has been prepared in accordance with accounting standards and policies which comply with Listing Rule 19.11A.

2        This statement gives a true and fair view of the matters disclosed.

 

Date:                29 January 2025

Authorised by:  Company Secretary

(Name of body or officer authorising release – see note 4)

Notes

1.          This quarterly cash flow report and the accompanying activity report provide a basis for informing the market about the entity’s activities for the past quarter, how they have been financed and the effect this has had on its cash position. An entity that wishes to disclose additional information over and above the minimum required under the Listing Rules is encouraged to do so.

2.          If this quarterly cash flow report has been prepared in accordance with Australian Accounting Standards, the definitions in, and provisions of, AASB 6: Exploration for and Evaluation of Mineral Resources and AASB 107: Statement of Cash Flows apply to this report. If this quarterly cash flow report has been prepared in accordance with other accounting standards agreed by ASX pursuant to Listing Rule 19.11A, the corresponding equivalent standards apply to this report.

3.          Dividends received may be classified either as cash flows from operating activities or cash flows from investing activities, depending on the accounting policy of the entity.

4.          If this report has been authorised for release to the market by your board of directors, you can insert here: “By the board”. If it has been authorised for release to the market by a committee of your board of directors, you can insert here: “By the [name of board committee – eg Audit and Risk Committee]”. If it has been authorised for release to the market by a disclosure committee, you can insert here: “By the Disclosure Committee”.

5.          If this report has been authorised for release to the market by your board of directors and you wish to hold yourself out as complying with recommendation 4.2 of the ASX Corporate Governance Council’s Corporate Governance Principles and Recommendations, the board should have received a declaration from its CEO and CFO that, in their opinion, the financial records of the entity have been properly maintained, that this report complies with the appropriate accounting standards and gives a true and fair view of the cash flows of the entity, and that their opinion has been formed on the basis of a sound system of risk management and internal control which is operating effectively.

#GRX GreenX Metals LTD – GreenX Selected for BHP Xplor’s 2025 Program

GREENX SELECTED FOR BHP XPLOR’S 2025 ACCELERATOR PROGRAM

  • GreenX is one of eight early-stage exploration companies selected by BHP to participate in the 2025 BHP Xplor program
  • BHP Xplor will provide GreenX with approximately US$500,000 in non-dilutive funding to support and accelerate its exploration plans at the Tannenburg Copper Project during the 6-month period of the program
  • Selection for BHP Xplor also gives GreenX access to BHP’s global expertise, networks and partnerships
  • BHP Xplor is expected to accelerate the geological concept build-out and exploration timeframe at the Tannenberg Copper Project

GreenX Metals Limited (GreenX or Company) is pleased to announce that following a rigorous selection process, it has been selected as one of eight exploration companies to participate in BHP’s 2025 Xplor program. 

The Xplor program was established in 2023 to support promising minerals explorers to accelerate the exploration needed to support the energy transition. Over a six-month program period, BHP Xplor targets development of technical, business and operational excellence within participating companies.

As a 2025 BHP Xplor cohort company, GreenX will receive a one-off, non-dilutive grant of up to US$500,000, and in-kind services, mentorship, and networking opportunities with BHP and other industry experts and investors.

There are no obligations or commitments on GreenX beyond the conclusion of the BHP Xplor program attached to the grant, other than certain exclusivity, pre-emption and data sharing rights as disclosed below. 

It is expected GreenX’s participation in Xplor will expedite the build-out of geological concepts and the exploration timeframe at the Tannenberg Copper Project (Tannenberg or Project) in Germany. GreenX intends to use the grant to conduct geophysics programs over the Tannenberg licence area. 

GreenX Metals’ Chief Executive Officer, Mr Ben Stoikovich, commented:

This is an exciting opportunity for GreenX and a strong endorsement of the exploration potential of the Tannenberg project targeting Kupferschiefer style copper mineralisation. Kupferschiefer style deposits are a well-known and prolific subtype of sediment-hosted copper deposit that are the second most prevalent source of copper production and reserves in the world. The Tannenberg license area contains historically producing copper mines and multiple historical drill intercepts, with excellent potential for new discoveries of shallow (50 m to 500 m), large scale and high-grade copper and silver mineralisation, with much of the licence area remaining untested by modern exploration.

We are pleased to be recognised for our approach by BHP, a clear industry leader, and look forward to working with the BHP Xplor team going forward.”

The eight BHP Xplor 2025 cohort explorers were selected from hundreds of applicants. 

BHP’s Head of Xplor, Marley Palin, congratulated GreenX, saying:

“The field of applicants for BHP Xplor was extremely strong this year. Successful applicants had to demonstrate not only that their critical-mineral projects were highly prospective but also that they were committed to pushing industry boundaries in their geological concepts and data-gathering, testing and processing to realise the project. GreenX more than met these criteria and we look forward to partnering with them.”

ENQUIRIES

Ben Stoikovich
Chief Executive Officer

+44 207 478 3900

 

Sapan Ghai
Business Development

+44 207 478 3900

 

Forward Looking Statements

This release may include forward-looking statements, which may be identified by words such as “expects”, “anticipates”, “believes”, “projects”, “plans”, and similar expressions. These forward-looking statements are based on GreenX’s expectations and beliefs concerning future events. Forward looking statements are necessarily subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are outside the control of GreenX, which could cause actual results to differ materially from such statements. There can be no assurance that forward-looking statements will prove to be correct. GreenX makes no undertaking to subsequently update or revise the forward-looking statements made in this release, to reflect the circumstances or events after the date of that release.

The information contained within this announcement is deemed by the Company to constitute inside information as stipulated under the Market Abuse Regulations (EU) No. 596/2014 as it forms part of UK domestic law by virtue of the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 (‘MAR’). Upon the publication of this announcement via Regulatory Information Service (‘RIS’), this inside information is now considered to be in the public domain. 

Summary of Exclusivity, Pre-Emption Rights and Data Sharing

Exclusivity

Only in respect of the Project, for the duration of the 6 month program term, GreenX will not, without the prior written consent of BHP:

·      undertake or propose to undertake an IPO or any other transaction which is not a Permitted Transaction (Restricted Transaction); or

·      solicit or enter into any discussions regarding the foregoing.

A Permitted Transaction is a transaction which doesn’t have the purpose or effect of raising capital in connection with the Project or which is only for general working capital purposes of the business of GreenX.

The Project is the Tannenberg Copper Project in Germany within a defined area as specified in the Xplor program agreement.

Pre-Emption Rights

If during the program term, BHP or a related entity elect to make a non-binding proposal for an investment in the Project or GreenX, BHP has a Right of First Refusal (ROFR) until 12 months after the end of the program term as follows:

·      If GreenX or a third party propose a Restricted Transaction, BHP will have the ROFR to negotiate a definitive agreement as the exclusive counterparty regarding any proposed Restricted Transaction on the same terms and conditions as offered in the proposed Restricted Transaction.

Data Sharing

During the program term GreenX commits to provide BHP with certain information including progress reports regarding the Project, technical data obtained and expenditure incurred.

GreenX Option Agreement

The provisions above do not impact GreenX’s rights under the Option Agreement for the Project (refer to announcement dated 2 August 2024).

#AYM Anglesey Mining PLC – UK 2024 Criticality Assessment

Following a study by the UK Critical Minerals Intelligence Centre (CMIC), commissioned by the Department for Business and Trade (DBT) and hosted at the British Geological Survey (BGS), Anglesey Mining plc (AIM:AYM), is pleased to announce that Zinc (Zn) has now been added to the UK Critical Minerals List. The report can be accessed via the following link:

 

https://www.ukcmic.org/downloads/reports/ukcmic-2024-criticality-assessment.pdf

 

Anglesey considers the classification of zinc as a critical mineral to be a significant positive step for the importance of its Parys Mountain resource in Anglesey, North Wales.  The current declared resources at Parys Mountain include over 200,000 tonnes of contained zinc along with other minerals including copper, silver, gold and lead, as can be seen in the following table:

 

Parys Mountain Resources, Combined March 2023 and January 2021
 

Classification

 

Tonnes

(Mt)

Grades Contained Metal
Cu Zn Pb Ag Au Cu Zn Pb Ag Au
(%) (%) (%) (g/t) (g/t) (kt) (kt) (kt) (Moz) (koz)
  Measured 1.30 0.33 2.32 1.28 33 0.43 4.3 30.1 16.6 1.36 18.0
  Indicated 3.98 0.37 2.39 1.29 27 0.23 14.7 95.3 51.5 3.47 29.7
  Inferred 10.79 1.29 0.81 0.43 9 0.11 139.4 87.7 46.6 3.05 38.9
Total 16.06 0.98 1.33 0.71 15 0.17 158 213 115 7.9 86

Source: Parys Mountain Resource Update notification released by Anglesey on 3 April 2023 (link)

Copper (Cu) is currently on the critical minerals lists in China, USA, Canada, India, Japan and South Korea. Although not meeting their normal thresholds, it has been added this year to the Australian Critical Minerals list and has been listed on the EU critical minerals list as a “strategic mineral.” Copper is not at present on the UK Critical Minerals List; however, the report recognises (Section 4.2) that the latest Criticality Assessment represents the current picture of demand and supply risk based on data for 2018 to 2022. The report also suggests that new technologies are emerging which will lead to increasing demand for numerous materials which are already listed as critical, but also many that are not, such as Cu, Ag, Cr, Mo etc.

 

Section 4.3.1 involves a detailed analysis of the increasing demand for copper linked to emerging technologies and carbon net zero targets versus the possible supply chain risks in being able to increase mining output to meet the higher demand.  Section 4.3.1 ends with the comment “It is simply reasonable to acknowledge that, although Cu remains below the criticality threshold at present, this may change in the near future.”

 

Rob Marsden, CEO of Anglesey Mining, commented: “Whilst our recent focus at Parys Mountain has been to push forward with the planning and permitting for the new mining project, it is very encouraging to note that at the same time a number of the minerals making up our resource are becoming more widely recognised as being of major importance to emerging technologies and the drive for net carbon zero. We are hopeful that an increase in demand for those minerals will make the project more attractive to investors and will also provide stable commodity prices to support our business plan. The 4th annual Critical Minerals Conference, which took place on the 2nd of December in London, was very well attended and afforded me the opportunity to discuss with the MPs present the importance of the Parys Mountain deposit” 

 

 

About Anglesey Mining plc:

 

Anglesey Mining is traded on the AIM market of the London Stock Exchange and currently has 461,593,017 ordinary shares in issue.

 

Anglesey is developing the 100% owned Parys Mountain Cu-Zn-Pb-Ag-Au VMS deposit in North Wales, UK with a reported resource of 5.3 million tonnes at over 4.0% combined base metals in the Measured and Indicated categories and 10.8 million tonnes at over 2.5% combined base metals in the Inferred category.

Anglesey also holds a 49.75% interest in the Grängesberg iron ore project in Sweden and 12% of Labrador Iron Mines Holdings Limited, which through its 52% owned subsidiaries, is engaged in the exploration and development of direct shipping iron ore deposits in Labrador and Quebec.

 

For further information, please contact:

Anglesey Mining plc

Rob Marsden, Chief Executive Officer – Tel: +44 (0)7531 475111

Andrew King, Interim-Chairman – Tel: +44 (0)7825 963700

 

Davy

Nominated Adviser & Joint Corporate Broker

Brian Garrahy / Daragh O’Reilly – Tel: +353 1 679 6363

 

Zeus Capital Limited

Joint Corporate Broker

Katy Mitchell / Harry Ansell – Tel: +44 (0)161 831 1512

 

LEI: 213800X8BO8EK2B4HQ71

 

 


#GRX GreenX Metals Ltd – High Grade Antimony Identified at Eleonore North

 GreenX Metals Limited (GreenX or the Company) is pleased to announce that high grade antimony mineralisation has been identified at the Company’s Eleonore North project (Eleonore North or ELN) in Greenland, based on historical results recently released by the Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland (GEUS). The historical results indicate the potential for a high-grade antimony-gold mineral system at ELN. Antimony prices have been on a rapid uptrend since China announced antimony export controls from 15 September 2024, with antimony prices in the US having rocketed to US$37,500/t from US$18,300/t1 in the past week.

HIGH GRADE ANTIMONY IDENTIFIED AT ELEONORE NORTH PROJECT

·     

GreenX receives outstanding antimony results at Eleonore North project in Greenland.

·     

Antimony price now US$37,500/t from historical prices of ~US$5,000 to 10,000/t.

·     

Critical mineral crisis escalating – China has now restricted export of critical and strategic antimony, graphite, gallium, germanium, tungsten, titanium and rare earths.

·      Historical results from GEUS 2008 fieldwork at ELN have been made available and include grab samples from outcropping mineralised veins with individual specimens grading up to 23% antimony (Sb), and other samples up to 4g/t gold (Au).

·      Previously reported historical data confirmed the presence of gold and high-grade antimony in outcropping veins at ELN including:

14m long chip sample grading 7.2% Sb and 0.53g/t Au2

40 m chip line with a length weighed average of 0.78g/t Au2

·      Antimony mineralisation has been identified along a ~4km trend in veins and structures, that broadly aligns with previously identified gold veining at surface within a 15km trend. 

Figure 1: Newly released GEUS assay results show evidence for high-grade antimony and gold mineralisation above the interpreted Noa Pluton.

·      Significantly, GEUS geologist’s identified stibnite (Sb2S3) as the antimony mineral. Stibnite is well-understood and the predominant ore mineral for commercial antimony production.

·      Antimony is designated a Critical Raw Material by both the EU and the US, with China being the world’s major antimony ore producer and major exporter of refined antimony oxides and metallic antimony.

·      Global strategic interest in antimony has significantly increased in 2024 due to several factors:

China controls ~50% of global antimony mining, most downstream processing and 32% of global resources according to the Lowy Institute.

China’s recent export ban on antimony, effective from 15 September 2024, has caused market disruption3.

Antimony is a crucial material in the defence supply chain, used in various military applications including ammunition, flame retardants, and smart weaponry.

Antimony is essential in renewable energy technologies including more-energy-efficient solar panel glass and in preventing thermal runaway in batteries.

·      The antimony market is expected to grow by 65% between 2024 and 20324. However, the supply side, declining antimony grades and depleting resources for existing mines are becoming increasingly relevant.

In terms of new deposits, antimony is harder to find than most metals because stibnite has no geophysical electrical or magnetic response

·      To aid the Company’s exploration targeting and fieldwork planning for ELN, GreenX’s technical team intend to locate, analyse, and study further historical samples and data within GEUS’s archives in the coming weeks. 

GreenX Metals’ Chief Executive Officer, Mr Ben Stoikovich, commented: “Antimony is of critical importance in multiple defence applications and for the energy transition. Antimony features on both the EU and US critical raw materials lists due to China’s dominance of global antimony supply. Whilst we had previously focussed on the ELN project primarily for gold mineralisation, the newly published historical results with out-cropping vein samples grading up to 23% antimony, indicate the potential for ELN to host viable antimony mineralisation. We plan to now re-focus our exploration program at ELN on both gold and antimony targets.

The Announcement Contains Inside Information

Figure 2: Noa Pluton prospect area within the Eleonore North Licence.

ANTIMONY RESULTS FROM NEWLY PUBLISHED GEOLOGICAL SURVEY ARCHIVE MATERIAL

GEUS’s archives host an extensive collection of rock samples (with and without assays), maps, as well as government and company reports going back many decades. A sub-set of the archive material is available in digital format. GEUS is continuously digitising and publishing its archive material. The newly released data covers 2008 field work at the Noa Dal valley within the Company’s ELN project. Government geologists collected mineralised samples from outcropping veins and scree near to the interpreted Noa Pluton. Selected highlights are presented in Table 1 below.

Table 1: Selected antimony and gold results from 2008 GEUS fieldwork

Sample #

Sb (%)

Au (g/t)

Field description

469506

23.40

0.00

Quartz vein with stibnite. Sample from boulder or scree

496901

22.20

0.44

Massive stibnite from mineralised zone

496918

15.10

0.54

Quartz vein + galena + chalcopyrite

469504

6.65

0.83

Shale with stibnite

496912

0.10

4.10

Clay alteration: hanging wall

496904

0.11

4.70

Clay alteration: footwall

496910

0.04

2.20

Intense clay alteration

These newly released results conform with previously released historical results from the Noa Dal area (previously reported in ASX announcement dated 10 July 2023).

GEOLOGICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF ANTIMONY

GreenX is targeting Reduced Intrusion-related Gold Systems (RIRGS) at ELN. The hypothesised blind-to-the-surface Noa Pluton forms the basis for the RIRGS exploration model. Antimony-gold veins at surface were considered to be supporting evidence for RIRGS at ELN. With the favourable shift in the antimony market, the outcropping veins have become a potentially viable and attractive target.

The antimony-gold mineralisation at ELN could be analogous to Perpetua Resources’ Stibnite Gold Project in Idaho, USA. There, RIRGS and orogenic gold mineralisation styles overprint each other. Prior to the RIRGS model at ELN, the gold-bearing veins at Noa Dal were thought to be of orogenic origin. It is relatively common in gold deposits which are proximal to intrusions to feature characteristics of RIRGS and orogenic gold mineralisation styles.   

The scale and potential of the antimony-gold veins will be evaluated with a follow-up investigation in the next phase of fieldwork.

GEUS is in the process of releasing results from regional mapping and sampling surveys from field seasons in 2022 and 2023 across East Greenland. GreenX plans to use the soon-to-be-released data as part of ongoing evaluation of the antimony and gold potential at ELN and the region.

Given recent developments in the antimony market, GreenX’s exploration strategy at the ELN project in East Greenland will continue with a renewed focus on the known Sb-Au mineral systems at the Noa pluton.

ENQUIRIES

Ben Stoikovich                         Sapan Ghai

Chief Executive Officer             Business Development

+44 207 478 3900                     +44 207 478 3900

-ENDS- 

COMPETENT PERSONS STATEMENT

Information in this announcement that relates to Exploration Results is based on information compiled by Mr Joel Burkin, a Competent Person who is a member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists. Mr Burkin is a consultant engaged by GreenX. Mr Burkin has sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity being undertaken, to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Mr Burkin consents to the inclusion in this announcement of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

This release may include forward-looking statements, which may be identified by words such as “expects”, “anticipates”, “believes”, “projects”, “plans”, and similar expressions. These forward-looking statements are based on GreenX’s expectations and beliefs concerning future events. Forward looking statements are necessarily subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are outside the control of GreenX, which could cause actual results to differ materially from such statements. There can be no assurance that forward-looking statements will prove to be correct. GreenX makes no undertaking to subsequently update or revise the forward-looking statements made in this release, to reflect the circumstances or events after the date of that release.

The information contained within this announcement is deemed by the Company to constitute inside information as stipulated under the Market Abuse Regulations (EU) No. 596/2014 as it forms part of UK domestic law by virtue of the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 (‘MAR’). Upon the publication of this announcement via Regulatory Information Service (‘RIS’), this inside information is now considered to be in the public domain.

Sources:

1 Source: SP Angel 22/11/24 & Asianmetals.com

2 Previously reported – refer to ASX announcement dated 10 July 2023

3 https://chemical.chemlinked.com/news/chemical-news/china-restricts-export-of-antimony-and-related-products

4 https://www.fortunebusinessinsights.com/antimony-market-104295 

Appendix  1: Exploration results and JORC Tables

Table 1: Historical GEUS rock samples from 2008

Sample ID

Easting

Northing

Sb (ppm)

Au (g/t)

Field Description

469501

-25.0093

73.29184

85,100

0

Silicified quartzite with stibnite

469502

-25.0078

73.29173

39,600

0.55

Silicified quartzite with stibnite

469503

-25.0054

73.29182

96,500

0

Silicified quartzite with stibnite

469504

-24.9471

73.2908

66,500

0.83

Shale with stibnite

469505

-25.0675

73.30148

129,000

0

Quartzite with stibnite

469506

-25.0675

73.30148

234,000

0

Vein quartz with stibnite, Sample from boulder or scree

469507

-25.0669

73.30519

987

Vein quartz with galena and chalcopyrite

469508

-24.925

73.29301

577

Silicified limestone breccia

496901

-25.0063

73.29178

222,000

0.44

Massive stibnite from mineralised zone

496902

-25.0063

73.29178

50,900

0

Quartzite  breccia + stibnite

496903

-25.0015

73.28947

274

Footwall quartzite

496904

-25.0064

73.29182

1,130

4.7

Clay alteration: footwall

496905

-25.0063

73.29178

451

1.1

Clay alteration: footwall

496906

-25.0063

73.29178

184

0.07

Quartzite  breccia

496907

-25.0062

73.29173

62

0

Quartzite breccia + stibnite

496908

-25.0061

73.29168

78

2

Stibnite-rich breccia + heavy alteration

496909

-25.0062

73.29166

143

2.4

Clay alteration: hanging wall

496910

-25.0064

73.29171

383

2.2

Intense clay alteration: hanging wall

496911

-25.0065

73.29166

58

0.18

Quartzite hanging wall

496912

-25.0075

73.29166

1,080

4.1

Clay alteration: hanging wall

496913

-24.9465

73.29073

1,180

4

Quartzite breccia + alteration

496914

-24.9471

73.29088

267

0.28

Quartzite breccia + quartz-veining

496915

-24.947

73.29084

65,100

0.66

Quartzite breccia + stibnite

496916

-24.9474

73.29085

63,700

0.65

Wall rock quartzite

496917

-25.0657

73.30175

10,000

Stibnite-rich breccia in quartzite.

Sample from boulder or scree

496918

-25.0658

73.30178

151,000

0.54

Quartz-vein + galena + chalcopyrite

Note:      Coordinates are in WGS 84 decimal degree format.

10,000ppm = 1%

JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1 Report

Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data

(Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections.)

Criteria

JORC Code explanation

Commentary

Sampling techniques

Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels, random chips, or specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling.

GEUS collected grab samples of in situ and loose rocks.

 

Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used.

No QAQC was reported.

 

Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public Report. In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has been done this would be relatively simple (eg ‘reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay’). In other cases more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (eg submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information.

Work was not conducted to modern industry standards.

Drilling techniques

Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (eg core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc).

N/A

Drill sample recovery

Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries and results assessed.

 

N/A

 

Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure representative nature of the samples.

N/A

 

Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material.

N/A

Logging

Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies.

Rock grab samples were described in the field and are not used in any estimates or studies.

 

Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc) photography.

The logging of rock grab samples was qualitative/descriptive in nature. If photos of the samples exist, they have not been released by GEUS.

 

The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged.

N/A

Sub-sampling techniques

and sample preparation

If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core taken.

N/A

If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc and whether sampled wet or dry.

N/A

For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample preparation technique.

N/A

 

Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages to maximise representivity of samples.

N/A

 

 

Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in situ material collected, including for instance results for field duplicate/second-half sampling.

N/A

 

Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being sampled.

N/A

Quality of assay data and laboratory tests

The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or total.

All samples are historical in nature and do not comply with modern QAQC protocols.

 

For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc, the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc.

N/A

 

Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (ie lack of bias) and precision have been established.

N/A

Verification of sampling and assaying

The verification of significant intersections by either independent or alternative company personnel.

 

No verification carried out.

 

The use of twinned holes.

N/A

 

Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols.

N/A

 

Discuss any adjustment to assay data.

N/A

Location of data points

Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource estimation.

Location of samples was collected with a handheld GPS unit. No Mineral Resource estimate is given.

 

Specification of the grid system used.

Location data is provided in the World Geodetic System 1984 (WGS 84) in decimal degrees.

 

Quality and adequacy of topographic control.

N/A

Data spacing and distribution

Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results.

The samples GEUS collected in 2008 are select rock grab samples. They did not attempt to collect data at regular spacings.  

 

Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied.

N/A

 

Whether sample compositing has been applied.

N/A

Orientation of data in relation to geological structure

Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of possible structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the deposit type.

The grab samples are point data and were likely collected biased to visible mineralisation. They were collected within and adjacent to mineralised veins and fault structures.

 

If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material.

No sampling bias.

Sample security

The measures taken to ensure sample security.

The practices of GEUS in 2008 are unknown to GreenX, but are not considered material for the present potential of Eleonore North.

Audits or reviews

The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data.

GreenX is unaware if any audits or reviews were performed but has no concerns about their absence.

 

Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results

(Criteria in the preceding section also apply to this section.)

Criteria

JORC Code explanation

Commentary

Mineral tenement and land tenure status

Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmental settings.

 The Eleonore North Project is a result of a scientific and systematic reduction of Greenfield Exploration’s (GEX) ‘Frontier’ Project.  Eleonore North comprises two Exploration Licences (MEL2023-39 and MEL 2018-19).  The combined spatial area of licences is 1,220.81 km2.

The boundaries of Eleonore North Project are defined by the points:

 

MEL2023-39 (two polygons: 1,189.77 km2)

73.98333   °N            25.30000   °W

73.98333   °N            25.13333   °W

73.95000   °N            25.13333   °W

73.95000   °N            25.01667   °W

73.91667   °N            25.01667   °W

73.91667   °N            24.86667   °W

73.88333   °N            24.86667   °W

73.88333   °N            24.51667   °W

73.86667   °N            24.51667   °W

73.86667   °N            24.48333   °W

73.85000   °N            24.48333   °W

73.85000   °N            24.43333   °W

73.70000   °N            24.43333   °W

73.70000   °N            24.48333   °W

73.68333   °N            24.48333   °W

73.68333   °N            25.01667   °W

73.70000   °N            25.01667   °W

73.70000   °N            25.05000   °W

73.71667   °N            25.05000   °W

73.71667   °N            25.08333   °W

73.73333   °N            25.08333   °W

73.73333   °N            25.21667   °W

73.75000   °N            25.21667   °W

73.75000   °N            25.26667   °W

73.76667   °N            25.26667   °W

73.76667   °N            25.33333   °W

73.78333   °N            25.33333   °W

73.78333   °N            25.38333   °W

73.80000   °N            25.38333   °W

73.80000   °N            25.48333   °W

73.91667   °N            25.48333   °W

73.91667   °N            25.25000   °W

73.95000   °N            25.25000   °W

73.95000   °N            25.30000   °W

 

73.41667   °N            25.31667   °W

73.41667   °N            25.03333   °W

73.43333   °N            25.03333   °W

73.43333   °N            24.60000   °W

73.23333   °N            24.60000   °W

73.23333   °N            25.60000   °W

73.26667   °N            25.60000   °W

73.26667   °N            25.53333   °W

73.30000   °N            25.53333   °W

73.30000   °N            25.45000   °W

73.31667   °N            25.45000   °W

73.31667   °N            25.31667   °W

 

MEL 2018-19 (two polygons: 31.04 km2)

73.16667   °N            25.11667   °W

73.16667   °N            25.01667   °W

73.15000   °N            25.01667   °W

73.15000   °N            25.05000   °W

73.13333   °N            25.05000   °W

73.13333   °N            25.15000   °W

73.15000   °N            25.15000   °W

73.15000   °N            25.11667   °W

 

73.23333   °N            25.05000   °W

73.23333   °N            24.76667   °W

73.21667   °N            24.76667   °W

73.21667   °N            25.01667   °W

73.20000   °N            25.01667   °W

73.20000   °N            25.05000   °W

The licences are currently in credit due to previous expenditure. Expenditure above the minimum regulatory requirement is carried forward for a maximum of three years.  Eleonore North is in good standing and GreenX owns 100% of the licences following conclusion of a revised option agreement as announced on 15 July 2024.. 

 

GreenX will issue a 1.5% NSR for Eleonore North.

 

The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area.

The licences are in good standing.

Exploration done by other parties

Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties.

1953 – lead, copper and zinc bearing veins were discovered in Noa Valley as part of a regional mapping program by Nordisk Mineselskab A/G (‘Nordisk’).

 

1974 – 1976:  Nordisk mapped the Holmesø copper-antimony prospect in Brogetdal, Strindbergland.  Geophysical surveying was performed.  The outcropping mineralisation was blasted a 100kg bulk sample was retrieved, of which 35kg was sent for analysis.  Finally, an attempt was made to drill the mineralisation, and only the top 1.4m of a targeted 17m mineralised horizon was sampled before the rig broke down.  Nordisk concluded that the Holmesø mineralisation is epigenetic.

 

1981 – 1983:  Nordisk discovered the two small, high-grade tungsten and antimony-tungsten deposits on Ymer Island.  These are respectively known as South Margeries Dal and North Margeries Dal.  These deposits were drilled Historical Estimates were made.  Economic studies were performed but concluded that more mineralised material was needed.  The drilled mineralisation is open at depth and along strike.  The historical work on the tungsten and antimony is not material to the understanding of the project’s gold potential.

 

1984 – 1986:  As part of Nordisk’s search for more tungsten mineralisation, a large gold bearing vein was discovered in the southern cliff face of Noa Valley.  The mineralisation in the scree was sampled.  Geochemical sampling was also performed which identified a 10 to 15 km long multielement anomaly dominated by arsenic and antimony, which have a positive correlation with gold.  Nordisk had a strategic shift towards petroleum exploration after this point in time.

 

1992:  With the demise of Nordisk in 1991, the Greenland state owned enterprise, NunaOil A/S in collaboration with Australia’s Pasminco Ltd did additional sampling of the Noa gold veins.  The program was successful in finding additional veins in the valley floor and extending the known mineralisation.  However, the corporate mandate was for ‘high grade gold’ which it was unsuccessful in locating.   This result is unsurprising given that the veins are above the hornfels and correspondingly yield high-grade antimony and low-gold content.  GEX expects the gold content to increase, and antimony to decrease at depth towards the causative pluton.

 

2008 – 2009: GEUS visited Ymer Island and took various rock grab samples in the Noa Dal area. Assay results from these samples were recently made publicly available on the Greenland Portal.

 

2009: NunaMinerals A/S, a public-private spinout from NunaOil A/S, conducted a heliborne magnetic survey over Margeries Valley and Noa Valley.  The purpose of this survey was to directly detect tungsten, and antimony deposits.  Neither of the known deposits were detectable using this method, however a distinct circular magnetic feature was identified in Noa Valley.   This magnetic feature was interpreted to be a granitic/intermediate intrusion.  During this time, samples from the South Margeries Dal deposit were sent for metallurgical analysis, which determined that the material was potentially suited to direct-shipping-ore, and amendable to basic beneficiation methods.

 

2011: Avannaa Resources Ltd (‘Avannaa’) conducted a basin-wide helicopter supported reconnaissance program.  This included visits to the Holmesø mineralisation.  Avannaa concluded that the Holmesø mineralisation was epigenetic and likely related to the mineralisation observed on Ymer Island.

 

2018-2019: Independence Group Ltd (subsequently rebranded as IGO Ltd (‘IGO’) through a joint-venture agreement with GEX, conducted three field programs that were focussed on the sedimentary-hosted copper deposit model.  During this time, IGO managed all geological aspects of the program while GEX managed the logistics in 2018 and 2019.  IGO visited Noa Valley in 2018 and 2019 but focussed on the north slope away from Noa Pluton, and on areas typified by magnetic highs rather than the lows which define Noa Pluton’s circular magnetic signature.  Despite this, quartzite mineralisation reminiscent of Holmesø was identified but no mineralogy is recorded in the documentation.  While in the field with IGO in 2019, GEX alerted IGO to the presence of antimony and gold in the south side of the valley, but no commensurate sampling was performed.   During the IGO earn-in period, GEX located the historical drillhole collars at North and South Margeries Dal tungsten/antimony deposits.

 

The Holmesø prospect was visited by IGO in 2018, 2019 and 2022.  IGO’s Holmesø sampling did not replicate Nordisk’s high-grade blast/bulk sample, or the drill results.  Regional sampling identified diagenetic copper, as well as remobilised epigentic copper that expresses as course blebs of chalcocite within porous, bed-cutting, vuggy conduits.

 

2022:  IGO conducted a structural and geochemical sampling program in Strindbergland (no activity on Ymer Island).  This program correctly concluded that the ‘sediment-hosted copper deposit model’ is not a suitable analogy.  IGO returned to GEX the licences that were in good standing, with the indebted licences being relinquished by IGO.  The remaining licences became the ‘Eleonore North’ project, which is a subset of the original ‘Frontier’ project area.

 

2023:  In May, GEX installed an array of passive seismic nodes on Ymer Island within the licence area. Passive seismic nodes record ambient noise in the crust and accumulate data over many weeks. In September 2023, GEX collected the nodes from Ymer Island. The nodes were returned to the Institute of Mine Seismology (IMS) for data download and processing. IMS produced a 3D velocity model.  

Geology

Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation.

Eleonore North licences, for the most part, cover Neoproterozoic-aged sediments belonging to the Eleonore Bay Supergroup.   These sediments trend from clastics up to carbonates.  The lithology of the sediments is not a primary consideration in the targeting of reduced intrusion related gold systems.  These sediments are intruded by granites and intermediate intrusives that are somewhat shallowly sourced due the Caledonian Orogenic event.  However, geochronology of the South Margeries Dal tungsten indicates that post-orogenic fluid flow occurred.  Post-orogenic granitic intrusions are consistent with RIRGS mineralisation, as the decompression allows for the fluidisation of gold in the mantle while providing conduits to surface.  Elsewhere, such post-orogenic emplacement is associated with deeply sourced lamprophyres, like those mapped in Noa Valley and Brogetdal. GEX identified for the first time, that ~373 Ma post-orogenic mineralisation event is related to the 385 Ma Kiffaanngissuseq hydrothermal event some 1,000 km to the north.  In the north at Kiffaanngissuseq the post-orogenic event was characterised by an east-west fluid flow.  In the south in the Frontier region that hosts Elenore North, the post orogenic event was dominated by magmatic intrusions and little hydrothermal activity.  Separating the two areas is the poorly understood, high-metamorphic grade Eclogite Province where peak metamorphism is of similar age to the Frontier and Kiffaanngissuseq processes.

Drill hole Information

A summary of all information material to the understanding of the exploration results including a tabulation of the following information for all Material drill holes:

easting and northing of the drill hole collar

elevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevation above sea level in metres) of the drill hole collar

dip and azimuth of the hole

down hole length and interception depth

hole length.

No drilling is reported with these results. 

 

If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that the information is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from the understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly explain why this is the case.

No information was excluded from the announcement.

Data aggregation methods

In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques, maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (eg cutting of high grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material and should be stated.

No data aggregation has been undertaken.

 

Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high grade results and longer lengths of low grade results, the procedure used for such aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of such aggregations should be shown in detail.

No data aggregation has been undertaken.

 

The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values should be clearly stated.

No metal equivalent results have been reported.

Relationship between mineralisation widths and intercept lengths

These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of Exploration Results. If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is known, its nature should be reported.

No drilling is reported with these results.  The reported results are grab samples from within or adjacent to mineralised veins and structures. They do not characterise the geometry of the mineralisation.

 

If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there should be a clear statement to this effect (eg ‘down hole length, true width not known’).

N/A

Diagrams

Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of intercepts should be included for any significant discovery being reported These should include, but not be limited to a plan view of drill hole collar locations and appropriate sectional views.

Appropriate maps and tables are included in the main body of this announcement.

Balanced reporting

Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not practicable, representative reporting of both low and high grades and/or widths should be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of Exploration Results.

All results are reported in Appendix 1: Table 1.

Other substantive exploration data

Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be reported including (but not limited to): geological observations; geophysical survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples – size and method of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock characteristics; potential deleterious or contaminating substances.

All substantive data are reported.

Further work

The nature and scale of planned further work (eg tests for lateral extensions or depth extensions or large-scale step-out drilling).

In Noa Valley, the target pluton(s) is constrained by seismic, magnetic and geochemical data.  The depth to the pluton is thought to be around 150m below surface based on the seismic results.  Field confirmation of potential host structures is warranted ahead of a subsequent drilling program. Future fieldwork will be planned and/or undertaken in conjunction with expert consultant(s).

 

At the South and North Margeries Dal prospects, a higher resolution digital terrain model should be obtained prior to generating Exploration Targets based on the historical drilling. 

 

Bulk sampling at the prospects will also be considered.

 

Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions, including the main geological interpretations and future drilling areas, provided this information is not commercially sensitive.

These diagrams are included in the main body of this release.

 

#GMET Golden Metal Resources PLC – First Day of Dealings

Golden Metal Resources plc, a mineral exploration company focused on tungsten, gold, copper, silver and zinc within Nevada, USA, is pleased to announce that, at 08:00 today, its ordinary shares will commence trading on AIM under the ticker GMET. As part of the process of admission to trading on AIM (“Admission”), the Company has raised gross proceeds of £1.98m through the issue of 23,317,643 new ordinary shares of £0.01 each at a placing price of 8.5 pence per share, equating to a market capitalisation of £7.16 million on Admission.

Overview

The key strengths and attributes of Golden Metal can be summarised as follows:

Location:

The state of Nevada is a well-regarded, mining investment friendly jurisdiction. It was ranked third in the Fraser Institute’s global mining investment attractiveness index survey in 2021 and has a long history of mining and a strong mining and ancillary business support network. Nevada is one of the principal producers of precious metals in the world, with 25 precious metal mines currently in production, accounting for approximately 70 per cent. of the United States total gold production in 2020. In 2018 Nevada accounted for 83 per cent. of the US’s total gold production.

According to the Nevada Mining Association (2022), as of November 2021, 11,000 people were employed by the metal mining sector within the state, with a Nevada Gross Domestic Product contribution of US$3.2 billion in 2020.

Projects with Critical and High-Demand Minerals:

The Company’s 100% owned Pilot Mountain Project (“Pilot Mountain”) hosts a tungsten-copper-silver-zinc Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE) which includes 12.53Mt at 0.27% W03 (tungsten tri-oxide) with significant copper-silver-zinc credits. Tungsten is an in-demand and critical metal as outlined below:

·         Tungsten is included in the British Geological Survey’s UK Critical Minerals list (2022), the US Geological Survey’s (USGS) Critical Minerals list (2022) and the European Commission’s Critical Raw Materials list (2020).

·         The global demand for tungsten is forecast to rise annually (3-7 per cent. per annum according to the British Geological Survey) and is predicted to outstrip available supply, which is likely to place continued upward pressure on prices in the near-term.

Management Team:

A proven management team with:

·         a broad spectrum of knowledge and capabilities;

·         substantial technical and listed company experience; and

·         extensive North American operating experience with connections to various in-country consulting teams.

Diverse Project Base:

The Golden Metal portfolio consists of four Nevada based projects (collectively the “Nevada Projects”) comprising the Pilot Mountain Project and three exploration stage projects: the Golconda Summit Project (gold), the Garfield Project (copper-gold-silver) and the Stonewall Project (gold-silver).

The Nevada Projects are all well located within major metallogenic belts containing active, globally important precious- and base-metal mining operations. All the assets have favourable geology which is prospective for skarn, carlin, epithermal and porphyry deposit types.  The portfolio is focussed on tungsten, gold, silver and base metal mineralisation.

In particular, the Pilot Mountain Project offers significant exploration upside potential as well as the opportunity for Golden Metal to de-risk the Project on a number of fronts. These include building on the existing MRE, furthering and updating technical studies relating to the potential development of the known resources, further permitting, making relevant grant applications, including to the DOD Defence Production Act (DPA) Title III grant office as well as commodity marketing and further metallurgical studies.

In total, the Nevada Projects cover a combined area of approximately 22.83 km2.

Oliver Friesen, CEO of Golden Metal, commented: 

Golden Metal’s admission to AIM comes at a time when it is clear that the world needs more critical, precious-and base-metals. This represents an exciting opportunity for a company such as ours with ownership of four diverse exploration and development assets located wholly within one of the top mining jurisdictions in the world. I believe that our Pilot Mountain Project, with its tungsten MRE, offers the greatest potential for exploitation, given that the US currently has no domestic primary production of the metal and is looking to reduce its heavy reliance on imports of critical metals from China. We are looking forward to actively pushing forward various exploration and corporate developments both within the US and UK and will provide further updates to the market on these various plans in due course.

I would like to thank all of the Golden Metal team and pre-IPO investors for their patience as we methodically worked through the various exploration and corporate developments which have led the Company to the exciting position it is in now. “

Background

Golden Metal is a mineral exploration company focused on tungsten, gold, copper, silver and zinc within Nevada, USA. It was established for the purpose of holding all of the Nevada mining assets of Power Metal Resources plc (“Power Metal”) and progressing the exploration and development of those assets. The Company holds four mining assets comprising the 100% owned Pilot Mountain, Garfield and Stonewall Projects together with an earn in option over the Golconda Summit Project. Each Project consists of unpatented lode mining claims located entirely on land managed by the United States Bureau of Land Management.

The Directors believe that the combination of a suite of high-quality, diversified Nevada based mining assets within a single, US-focused AIM-quoted vehicle creates a compelling investment opportunity. It is their opinion that the Nevada Projects hold several underexplored, highly prospective tungsten, gold, copper, silver and zinc exploration targets. The Directors consider that the Pilot Mountain Project has the potential to increase its existing tungsten focused MRE and to expand on multiple tungsten, copper, silver and zinc-rich zones identified by minimal historical drilling. In addition, the Directors consider that the Golconda Summit Project has the potential for a major gold discovery to follow the identification of significant surface gold mineralisation during a 1989 trenching programme. Accordingly, the Company’s exploration focus will be on these two projects but the Directors also believe there is potential value to be realised at the Garfield and Stonewall Projects.

On 8 April 2022, the Company raised £750,000 through a pre-IPO Financing at a price of 6.67 pence per Ordinary Share, following which Power Metal held 83.13 per cent. of the existing ordinary shares. On Admission, Power Metal will hold 62.1 per cent. of the Company’s enlarged share capital.

Placing, Subscription, Acquisition and Use of Proceeds

The Company has raised gross proceeds of £1,982,000 through a placing and subscription through the issue of 12,449,208 Placing Shares and 10,868,435 Subscription Shares at a price of 8.5 pence per share.

The net proceeds from the Placing and Subscription will be used by the Company to:

·         provide funding for the Company to further explore and develop the Nevada Projects; and

·         provide the Company with ongoing working capital to support its business operations.

Warrants

Together with every two Placing Shares and every two Subscription Shares, each Placee and Subscriber will also be granted one warrant entitling the holder to subscribe for one further new Ordinary Share at 10.75 pence per Ordinary Share, for a period of 12 months from Admission, and one warrant entitling the holder to subscribe for one further new Ordinary Share at 17 pence per Ordinary Share, for a period of 24 months from Admission. Further details of the warrants are set out in Part VI of the Company’s AIM admission document.

This announcement contains inside information for the purposes of Article 7 of EU Regulation 596/2014 (which forms part of domestic UK law pursuant to the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018).  

Forward Looking Statements

This announcement contains forward-looking statements relating to expected or anticipated future events and anticipated results that are forward-looking in nature and, as a result, are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, such as general economic, market and business conditions, competition for qualified staff, the regulatory process and actions, technical issues, new legislation, uncertainties resulting from potential delays or changes in plans, uncertainties resulting from working in a new political jurisdiction, uncertainties regarding the results of exploration, uncertainties regarding the timing and granting of prospecting rights, uncertainties regarding the timing and granting of regulatory and other third party consents and approvals, uncertainties regarding the Company’s or any third party’s ability to execute and implement future plans, and the occurrence of unexpected events. 

Actual results achieved may vary from the information provided herein as a result of numerous known and unknown risks and uncertainties and other factors.

For further information visit www.goldenmetalresources.com or contact the following:

Golden Metal Resources plc

Oliver Friesen (CEO)

Tel: +44 (0) 20 7583 8304

Cairn Financial Advisers LLP

Nominated Adviser

Sandy Jamieson/Jo Turner/Louise O’Driscoll

Tel: +44 20 7213 0880

First Equity Limited

Broker

Jonathan Brown/Jason Robertson

Tel: +44 20 7374 2212

 

The Projects:

Pilot Mountain Project

The Pilot Mountain project is an advanced exploration and mineral resource definition stage project located in Mineral County in western Nevada. The project covers an area of 14.80 km2 (3,656.1 acres) and is located 200km southeast of Reno and 18km east of Mina, Nevada. It is well situated for the supply of power, water and skilled labour and proximity to transport infrastructure in Mineral County and is centred around four existing mineral deposits: Garnet; Good Hope; Gunmetal and Desert Scheelite, all of which possess significant skarn-style tungsten-copper-silver-zinc mineralisation. The Pilot Mountain project consists of 176 active lode mining claims and 4 filed mill site claims. The four mill site claims filed at the former Dunham mill site have secure access to groundwater supply sufficient for the proposed project.

Golconda Summit Project

Golden Metal is the operator of the Golconda Summit project, which is held under an earn-in right to acquire up to 100 per cent. of the project from the mineral claim owner pursuant to an option agreement. The Golconda Summit project is an exploration stage gold and silver project located in Humboldt County and situated at the confluence of the Getchell and Battle Mountain – Eureka metallogenic trends, and consists of 44 lode mining claims, covering a total area of approximately 3.22 km2 (795.4 acres) located approximately 27km east of Winnemucca.

Garfield Project

The Garfield project is an early exploration stage copper, gold and silver property consisting of 39 lode mining claims covering 3.23 km2 (797.9 acres) located in Mineral County, Nevada, approximately 14km due east of the town of Hawthorne and 120km due west-northwest of Tonopah.

Stonewall Project

The Stonewall project is an exploration stage gold-silver property prospective for epithermal gold-silver mineralisation. The property consists of 19 lode mining claims covering 1.59 km2 (392.5 acres) located on the northern flank of Stonewall Mountain, on the western edge of the Nellis Airforce Range Restricted Access Area, in Nye County, Nevada, approximately 24km south-east of the historic gold mining town of Goldfield and 60km due south of Tonopah.

I would like to receive Brand Communications updates and news...
Free Stock Updates & News
I agree to have my personal information transfered to MailChimp ( more information )
Join over 3.000 visitors who are receiving our newsletter and learn how to optimize your blog for search engines, find free traffic, and monetize your website.
We hate spam. Your email address will not be sold or shared with anyone else.