Home » Posts tagged 'blackham resources limited'
Tag Archives: blackham resources limited
Salt Lake Potash #SO4 – March 2019 Quarterly Report & Appendix 5B Report
The Board of Salt Lake Potash Limited (the Company or Salt Lake Potash) is pleased to present its Quarterly Report for the period ending 31 March 2019.
The Company is focussed on rapidly progressing the development of its Lake Way Project, intended to be the first salt-lake brine Sulphate of Potash (SOP) production operation in Australia.
Highlights for the quarter and subsequently include:
Significant Increase in the high-grade SOP resource at Lake Way
Ø Mineral Resource Estimate for the whole of Lake Way contains 73 million tonnes (Mt) of SOP using Total Porosity and 8.2Mt of SOP calculated using Drainable Porosity, including:
o Measured – Lake Way Playa – 6.9Mt (total porosity) & 1.8Mt (drainable porosity) @ 15.4kg/m3
o Measured – Williamson Pit 32Kt (drainable porosity) @ 25.5kg/m3
o Indicated – Paleochannel 3.7Mt (total porosity) & 1.4Mt (drainable porosity) @ 13.6kg/m3
o Inferred – Lake Way Playa & Paleovalley Sediment 62.2Mt (total porosity) & 5.0Mt (drainable porosity) @ 15.2kg/m3
Ø Lake Way confirmed as very high-grade with consistent brine chemistry both laterally and at depth, with an average grade of 14.5kg of SOP per cubic metre of brine across the Lake Way tenements (Measured and Indicated)
Ø The Company has successfully delineated a Paleochannel in excess of 30km in length along the eastern boundary of Lake Way, which supports the ability and optionality to produce brine from two separate sources (lake playa and paleochannel)
Ø The Mineral Resource Estimate for the ‘whole of lake’ will enable the Company to progress technical studies for a larger production scenario with an anticipated release date towards the end of Q2 2019
Key Approval Obtained and Construction of initial Lake Way Ponds Commences
Ø Following receipt of the final approval from the Department of Water and Environmental Regulation (DWER), construction and operation of the First Phase of Lake Way Evaporation Ponds (Lake Way Ponds) immediately commenced
Ø Construction works for the Lake Way Evaporation ponds are progressing well with the Company having commenced 24/7 operations to rapidly progress development
Ø The first phase of the Lake Way Ponds will enable de-watering of the Lake Way Williamson Pit that contains the highest grade brine resource in Australia. Dewatering is expected to commence in Q2, 2019
Ø Onsite infrastructure for de-watering the Williamson Pit is under construction, including the placement and welding of piping
Ø The utilisation of the Williamson Pit brine will accelerate Salt Lake Potash’s pathway to first production of SOP at Lake Way
Binding Access Agreement Signed with Blackham Resources
Ø A binding Split Commodity and Access Agreement with Blackham Resources was executed for the Lake Way Project, in line with the terms of the MOU
Ø Under the Agreement, Salt Lake Potash acquires the brine rights over Blackham’s tenure and Blackham will acquire gold rights over Salt Lake Potash’s tenure. Each company retains a royalty on their respective mineral resources
Ø The Agreement with Blackham facilitates an accelerated pathway to production through the utilisation of Blackham’s Mining Lease for early construction works and the de-watering and utilisation of the high grade Williamson Pit brine
Planned Activities for the Lake Way Project over the coming months
Ø Completion of initial Lake Way Ponds and commencement of dewatering the Williamson Pit
Ø Resource drilling and trenching in the southern section of Lake Way to enable the Company to upgrade the resource category in the lake bed sediments.
Ø Progress technical studies for a larger production scenario with an anticipated release date during Q2 2019
Ø Completion of pilot plant process testwork at Saskatchewan Research Council (SRC) to lockdown process flowsheet and produce SOP product samples for end user trials
Ø Ongoing discussions with Tarlka Matuwa Piarku (Aboriginal Corporation) RNTBC (TMPAC) to convert Native Title Land Access and Exploration Agreement for Lake Way into a Native Title Mining Agreement
OVERVIEW
Salt Lake Potash is the owner of nine large salt lakes in the Northern Goldfields Region of Western Australia. This outstanding portfolio of assets has a number of important, favourable characteristics:
· Over 3,300km2 of playa surface, with in-situ clays suitable for low cost on-lake pond construction;
· Very large paleochannel hosted brine aquifers, with chemistry amenable to evaporation of salts for SOP production, extractable from both low-cost trenches and deeper bores;
· Excellent evaporation conditions;
· Excellent access to transport, energy and other infrastructure in the Goldfields mining district;
· Clear opportunity to reduce transport costs by developing lakes closer to infrastructure and by capturing economies of scale; and
· Potential for multi-lake production offers optionality and significant scale potential, operational flexibility, cost advantages and risk mitigation from localised weather events.
Salt Lake Potash’s immediate focus is on the rapid development of the Lake Way Project, intended to be the first salt-lake brine Sulphate of Potash production operation in Australia. Lake Way’s location and logistical advantages make it the ideal location for the Company’s first SOP operation. Construction has commenced on Australia’s first commercial scale on-lake evaporation ponds.
The Company’s long term plan is to develop an integrated SOP operation, producing from a number (or all) of the lakes. Salt Lake Potash will progressively explore each of the lakes with a view to estimating resources for each Lake, and determining the development potential. Exploration of the lakes will be prioritised based on likely transport costs, scale, permitting pathway and brine chemistry.
LAKE WAY PROJECT
Lake Way is located in the Northern Goldfields Region of Western Australia, less than 15km south of Wiluna. The surface area of the Lake is over 270km2.
Salt Lake Potash holds five Exploration Licences (two granted and three under application) and one application for a Mining Lease, covering most of Lake Way and select areas off-lake, including the paleochannel defined by previous exploration. The northern end of the Lake is largely covered by a number of Mining Leases, held by Blackham Resources Limited (Blackham), the owner of the Wiluna Gold Mine.
In April 2019, the Company entered into a binding Split Commodity and Access Agreement with Blackham in relation to the development of the Lake Way Project on terms in line with the previously executed MOU announced on 12 March 2018.
Lake Way has a number of compelling advantages which make it an ideal site for Salt Lake Potash’s initial SOP operation, including:
Ø Utilisation of Blackham’s existing infrastructure (including camps, power and maintenance) to accelerate development.
Ø The site has excellent freight solutions, being adjacent to the Goldfields Highway, which is permitted for heavy haulage, quad trailer road trains to the railhead at Leonora and then direct rail access to both Esperance and Fremantle Ports, or via other heavy haulage roads to Geraldton Port.
Ø The Goldfields Gas Pipeline is adjacent to Salt Lake Potash’s tenements, running past the eastern side of the Lake.
Ø Access to Blackham’s existing Mining Leases provides advanced permitting pathway for early development activity, including the construction of the initial Lake Way Evaporation Ponds.
Ø Salt Lake Potash has commenced construction of the initial Lake Way Evaporation Ponds which will enable the Company to dewater the existing Williamson Pit. The pit contains an estimated 1.2GL of brine at the exceptional grade of 25kg/m3 of SOP. This brine is the ideal starter feed for evaporation ponds, having already evaporated from the normal Lake Way brine grade, which averages over 14kg/m3.
Ø The high grade brines at Lake Way will result in lower capital and operating costs due to lower extraction and evaporation requirements.
Ø The presence of clays in the upper levels of the lake which are amenable to low cost, on-lake evaporation pond construction.
The Company is concurrently progressing the construction of the initial Lake Way Evaporation Ponds, whilst also rapidly advancing a ‘whole of lake’ scenario, including mineral resource estimates, permitting and approvals, pilot plant process testwork and assessment of infrastructure and logistical options.
The Mineral Resource Estimate for the ‘whole of lake’ reported in March 2019 will enable Salt Lake Potash to progress technical studies for a larger production scenario with an anticipated release date towards the end of the current quarter.
Discussions are also ongoing with a number of offtake partners and the testwork currently underway at SRC will provide high-grade SOP product samples for testing by these partners.
Field Work
During the quarter, the Company completed an extensive field based program providing inputs for the ‘whole of lake’ Mineral Resource Estimate announced in March 2019.
Thirteen shallow bores were drilled to a maximum depth of 7m, and each hole was sampled for brine and completed as piezometers for use in future water level monitoring. Up to three insitu samples were taken from each bore and analysed in the lab for total porosity and specific yield.
Trench 5 was excavated to a depth of 4m or refusal and to length of 110m. The trench was test pumped for a total of 10 days and the brine drawdown around the trench was measured using piezometer areas extending 100m from the trench. This data was used to determine drainable porosity and aquifer hydraulic conductivity.
Two historic investigation bores were test pumped to determine aquifer parameters. The bores were pumped by Global Groundwater Pty Ltd at a constant rate for 24 hours. Water level drawdown in the pumped bore, and in nearby observation bores was monitored manually and by data logger. The data was analysed to determine aquifer properties of transmissivity (Product of bulk average hydraulic conductivity and aquifer thickness), Storage coefficient and boundary conditions.
Several additional lines of passive seismic survey were also completed during the Quarter. The results were interpreted and incorporated into the overall dataset. Correlation of the passive seismic dataset with the historical drilling confirmed the presence of a significant paleochannel with several tributaries lying beneath the lake surface down the eastern side of the lake.
Mineral Resource Estimate
In March 2019, the Company completed an extensive exploration program covering the remaining areas of Lake Way and reported a ‘whole of lake’ Mineral Resource Estimate, covering the playa surface and the Paleochannel aquifers of Lake Way.
The Mineral Resource Estimate of 73Mt of SOP calculated using Total Porosity and 8.2Mt of SOP calculated using Drainable Porosity is hosted within approximately 15 billion cubic metres of sediment ranging in thickness from a few metres to over 100m, beneath 189km2 of Playa Lake surface including the paleochannel basal sand unit of 20m thickness and 30km length.
The Mineral Resource Estimate for Lake Way is divided into resource classifications that are controlled by the host geological units:
· Lake Bed Sediment
· Paleovalley Sediment
· Paleochannel Basal Sands
The mineral resource estimate is summarised in the Tables below:
Table 1: Measured Resource
Total Volume |
Brine Concentration |
Mineral Tonnage Calculated from Total Porosity |
Mineral Tonnage Calculated from Drainable Porosity |
|||||||
K |
Mg |
SO4 |
Total Porosity |
Brine Volume |
SOP Tonnage |
Drainable Porosity1 |
Brine Volume |
SOP Tonnage |
||
(Mm3) |
(kg/m3) |
(kg/m3) |
(Kg/m3) |
(Mm3) |
(Mt) |
(Mm3) |
(Mt) |
|||
North Lakebed (0.4-8.0 m) |
1,060 |
6.8 |
8.0 |
27.6 |
0.42 |
445 |
6.9 |
0.11 |
117 |
1.8 |
Williamson Pit |
1.26 |
11.4 |
14.7 |
48.0 |
1.26 |
0.03 |
||||
Total |
6.9 |
1.83 |
Table 2: Indicated Resource
Total Volume |
Brine Concentration |
Mineral Tonnage Calculated from Total Porosity |
Mineral Tonnage Calculated from Drainable Porosity |
|||||||
K |
Mg |
SO4 |
Total Porosity |
Brine Volume |
SOP Tonnage |
Drainable Porosity1 |
Brine Volume |
SOP Tonnage |
||
(Mm3) |
(kg/m3) |
(kg/m3) |
(Kg/m3) |
(Mm3) |
(Mt) |
(Mm3) |
(Mt) |
|||
Basal Sands (Paleochannel) |
686 |
6.1 |
8.2 |
25.0 |
0.40 |
274 |
3.7 |
15 |
103 |
1.4 |
Table 3: Inferred Resource
Total Volume |
Brine Concentration |
Mineral Tonnage Calculated from Total Porosity |
Mineral Tonnage Calculated from Drainable Porosity |
|||||||
K |
Mg |
SO4 |
Total Porosity |
Brine Volume |
SOP Tonnage |
Drainable Porosity1 |
Brine Volume |
SOP Tonnage |
||
(Mm3) |
(kg/m3) |
(kg/m3) |
(Kg/m3) |
(Mm3) |
(Mt) |
(Mm3) |
(Mt) |
|||
South Lakebed (0.4-8.0 m) |
316 |
6.8 |
8.0 |
27.6 |
0.42 |
133 |
2.0 |
0.11 |
35 |
0.5 |
Lakebed (8m to Base) |
9,900 |
6.8 |
8.0 |
27.6 |
0.40 |
3,960 |
60.0 |
0.03 |
297 |
4.5 |
Total |
62.0 |
5.0 |
(1) The Drainable Porosity does not include the significant resource potentially available through the recharge cycle. Refer Announcement dated 18 March 2019, Appendix 1.
The northern section of Mineral Resource Estimate (including the Blackham tenements) has been classified into a Measured category for the upper 8m of lakebed sediments. The resources contained within the lakebed sediments below 8m, and the southern section of the lake at all depths, are all classified in the Inferred category. The Paleochannel running along the eastern boundary of the lake has been classified in the Indicated category.
The Company will complete further drilling and trenching during the current quarter to increase the resource definition in the southern section of the lake and ultimately convert the Mineral Resource Estimate into Ore Reserves following further technical studies.
For further details on the Mineral Resource Estimate, refer to the Company’s Announcement dated 18 March 2019.
Civil Construction – On-Lake Infrastructure
Construction of the initial Lake Way Evaporation Ponds (Lake Way Ponds) commenced in March 2019 following receipt of the Part V works approval from the Department of Water and Environmental Regulation (DWER). The approval allows construction and operation of the Company’s initial phase commercial scale evaporation ponds for Lake Way and de-watering of the Williamson Pit.
Salt Lake Potash is constructing Australia’s first commercial scale on-lake evaporation ponds for a Sulphate of Potash (SOP) project at Lake Way. The initial phase ponds will consist of:
· Two evaporation ponds:
(i) Kainite Harvest Pond 500m x 500m (25 Ha); and
(ii) Halite Pond 2,000m x 500m (100 Ha);
· A 2km long and 8m deep trench is also being constructed running parallel to the ponds which will provide additional brine feed into the pond network;
· A 1.4km causeway from the Williamson Pit to the Kainite Harvest Pond; and
· Associated piping and pumping infrastructure.
The initial Lake Way Ponds will have a volume of 1.8GL which will be capable of capturing the total Williamson Pit Measured Brine Resource (1.2GL @ 25kg/m3 SOP equivalent).
The construction of the initial Lake Way Ponds is on track to be completed by the end of Q2 2019. The de-watering of the 1.2GL of Williamson Pit brine is expected to commence towards the end of Q2 2019.
Construction works for the Lake Way Ponds are progressing well with the Company moving to 24/7 operations to rapidly progress development. The Company is undertaking a wet hire and self-perform model for the construction of the initial Lake Way Ponds. This construction model allowed fast track mobilisation and execution of the works, whilst providing the Company with critical hands on experience allowing testing and validating of all design criteria to de-risk the future on-lake construction.
The construction works for the pond bund walls involves the stripping of the sandy evaporite layer of material on the lake’s surface and constructing the bund walls from adjacent won lake material. A key trench is then constructed at the upstream toe of the embankment.
The works are being completed with a number of specialised pieces of civil earthmoving equipment suited to the unique conditions, including amphibious excavators and low ground pressure equipment.
The de-watering of the Williamson Pit will commence in Q2 2019 once the first phase of the evaporation ponds is complete. Onsite preparation works have commenced for de-watering activity including the placement and welding of piping.
The Company has also established support infrastructure on Lake Way, comprising a site office, crib room, and full mechanical workshop with canopy capable of undertaking repairs to our fleet of equipment onsite without the need for demobilization to external repair facilities.
The Company continues to progress the Early Contractor Involvement (ECI) process for the larger ‘whole of lake’ development. Initial proposals for various elements of the on-lake development work have been received and are in the process of review.
Continuous Site Evaporation Trial
The Company commenced a further site evaporation trial (SET), with the objective of replicating the proposed Lake Way evaporation process in a continuous manner to produce harvest salts representative of on-lake conditions. Furthermore, these SETs will provide valuable experience to operators of large-scale ponds and enable testing of the currently proposed control philosophy of the solar evaporation ponds. The harvest salts attained from these continuous SETs will provide feedstock for testwork to provide design inputs for the commercial processing plant equipment.
The continuous SETs are currently reaching a steady-state, running as expected and producing harvest salts confirming the viability of the proposed Lake Way pond system design.
Weather stations are being procured and installed to accurately log the weather conditions at Lake Way. This in conjunction with on-going PAN evaporation trails, at various Mg concentrations, will allow Salt Lake Potash to accurately build a profile of the weather conditions expected at Lake Way and firm up final design and operational requirements.
Process Testwork
During the quarter, the Company engaged the world’s leading potash processing laboratory, Saskatchewan Research Council (SRC), to establish a pilot plant based on the process flow sheet for the Lake Way Project. The pilot plant will validate and refine the Lake Way process flowsheet and also produce high-grade SOP product samples for offtake partners.
Bench testwork from the initial batch of harvest salts delivered to SRC is now complete, thus confirming the flow sheet for the first pilot run.
The second batch of harvest salts has arrived at SRC for further test work and production of SOP product samples. Pilot plant testwork at SRC is expected to be completed during Q2, 2019.
In parallel SRC will also produce a measured amount of schoenite salt, enabling the selected crystalliser supplier to finalise preliminary design.
Native Title
In December 2018, the Company signed a Native Title Land Access and Brine Minerals Exploration Agreement (the Agreement) with Tarlka Matuwa Piarku (Aboriginal Corporation) RNTBC (TMPAC) covering the Lake Way Project area.
TMPAC entered into the Agreement with Salt Lake Potash on behalf of the Wiluna People who are the recognised Native Title Holders of the land covering the Lake Way Project area. TMPAC also provided consent for the total area required for the construction and operation of the initial Lake Way Ponds.
Salt Lake Potash and TMPAC are finalising negotiations on the terms of a Native Title Mining Agreement required for the ongoing mining operation.
Approvals Advancing
The Company received final approval from the Department of Water and Environmental Regulation (DWER) for the Part V works approval in March 2019, for construction and operation of the initial evaporation ponds for Lake Way and de-watering of the Williamson Pit.
The Department of Mines, Industry Regulation and Safety (DMIRS) has previously approved the Company’s Mining Proposal and Project Management Plan for the initial Lake Way Ponds, enabling an immediate start to construction.
A series of studies have continued to progress during the quarter in support of the ongoing environmental approvals. These include flora and fauna surveys, hydrological assessment, flood modelling and geotechnical investigations. Initial findings of these studies have indicated that:
· The planned minimal clearing of native vegetation and fauna habitat will not cause adverse impacts to flora or fauna of high conservation significance;
· Groundwater drawdown will not alter current groundwater levels;
· Construction of ponds on the lake surface will result in negligible local increases in water levels (Knight Piesold, 2019); and
· Underlying lake sediments show no significant sulfidic or sulphuric materials and/or monosulfidic black oozes, and the lake system has significant buffering capacity to neutralise potential impacts, if any.
During the quarter E53/1897 was granted, SO4’s granted tenure at Lake Way now covers approximately 278km2 with an additional 143km2 under application including Mining Lease Application M53/1102 applied for in March 2019.
Access Agreement
In April 2019, the Company entered into a binding Split Commodity and Access Agreement (Agreement) with Blackham Resources Limited (Blackham) in relation to the development of the Lake Way Project on terms in line with the previously executed MOU announced on 12 March 2018.
The Agreement with Blackham facilitates an accelerated pathway to production through the utilisation of Blackham’s Mining Lease for early construction works and the de-watering and utilisation of the Williamson Pit brine.
Under the Agreement, Salt Lake Potash will acquire Blackham’s brine rights and Blackham will acquire gold rights to Salt Lake Potash’s Lake Way holdings, with each company retaining a royalty on their respective holdings.
The Agreement is binding on the parties with the key terms including:
· Salt Lake Potash to acquire the Brine Rights over the Blackham tenements;
· Blackham to acquire the Gold Rights over the Salt Lake Potash tenements;
· Salt Lake Potash to receive a 2% royalty on all gold production from the Salt Lake Potash tenements;
· Blackham to receive a 4% royalty on all Brine production (including SOP) from the Blackham tenements;
· Salt Lake Potash to make a rehabilitation liability payment of $500,000 to Blackham by 30 June 2019. This amount is deductible from future brine royalties;
· Salt Lake Potash is required to achieve the following construction and production milestones:
o Completion of the de-watering of the Williamson Pit by 31 July 2019;
o Commence the construction of the SOP processing plant by 30 June 2020; and
o Achieve first commercial production of SOP by 31 December 2021
These dates may be extended by mutual agreement.
The following Conditions Precedent must be satisfied within 2 months of the date of the Agreement (or such later date as may be agreed by the parties):
· the Minister consenting (to the extent required):
o to Blackham granting the Brine Rights to Salt Lake Potash;
o to Salt Lake Potash granting the Gold Rights to Blackham.
· Blackham obtaining any approvals necessary to proceed with the Agreement, including the release of various encumbrances relating to the Brine Rights.
Corporate
During the Quarter, the Company appointed Mr Matthew Bungey as Project Director – Strategy and Funding. Mr Bungey’s initial focus is on advancing various funding alternatives for the Lake Way Project including debt financing, strategic partners and royalty financing.
Mr Bungey is an experienced advisor across M&A and financing, most recently as Managing Director with Barclays Bank in London. He has been involved in tens of billions of dollars of executed M&A transactions across the resources and agriculture sectors. Mr Bungey has also been involved in numerous financings and is a Board member of BGC Australia. Prior to banking he worked as a Chemical Engineer in the mining sector.
Discussions with a number of financiers regarding project financing are progressing well.
For further information please visit www.so4.com.au or contact:
Tony Swiericzuk / Clint McGhie |
Salt Lake Potash Limited |
Tel: +61 8 6559 5800 |
Jo Battershill |
Salt Lake Potash Limited |
Tel: +44 7540 366000 |
Colin Aaronson / Richard Tonthat / Ben Roberts |
Grant Thornton UK LLP (Nominated Adviser) |
Tel: +44 (0) 20 7383 5100 |
Derrick Lee / Beth McKiernan |
Cenkos Securities plc (Joint Broker) |
Tel: +44 (0) 131 220 6939 |
Rupert Fane / Ingo Hofmaier / Ernest Bell |
Hannam & Partners (Joint Broker) |
Tel: +44 (0) 20 7907 8500 |
Forward Looking Statements
This announcement may include forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based on Salt Lake’s expectations and beliefs concerning future events. Forward looking statements are necessarily subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are outside the control of Salt Lake, which could cause actual results to differ materially from such statements. Salt Lake makes no undertaking to subsequently update or revise the forward-looking statements made in this announcement, to reflect the circumstances or events after the date of that announcement.
Competent Persons Statement
The information in this Announcement that relates to Mineral Resources is extracted from the report entitled ‘Significant High-Grade SOP Resource Delineated at Lake Way’ dated 18 March 2019. This announcement is available to view on www.so4.com.au. The information in the original Announcement that related to Mineral Resources was based on, and fairly represents, information compiled by Mr Ben Jeuken, who is a member Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy and a member of the International Association of Hydrogeologists. Mr Jeuken is employed by Groundwater Science Pty Ltd, an independent consulting company. Mr Jeuken has sufficient experience, which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity, which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Salt Lake Potash Limited confirms that it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in the original market announcement and, in the case of estimates of Mineral Resources, that all material assumptions and technical parameters underpinning the estimates in the relevant market announcement continue to apply and have not materially changed. Salt Lake Potash Limited confirms that the form and context in which the Competent Person’s findings are presented have not been materially modified from the original market announcement
Appendix 1 – Summary of Exploration and Mining Tenements
As at 31 March 2019, the Company holds interests in the following tenements:
Project |
Status |
Type of Change |
License Number |
Interest (%) 1-Jan-19 |
Interest (%) 31-Mar-19 |
Western Australia |
|||||
Lake Way |
|||||
Central |
Granted |
– |
E53/1878 |
100% |
100% |
East |
Application |
– |
E53/2057 |
100% |
100% |
South |
Granted |
Granted |
E53/1897 |
100% |
100% |
South |
Application |
– |
E53/2059 |
100% |
100% |
South |
Application |
– |
E53/2060 |
100% |
100% |
Central |
Application |
Application |
M53/1102 |
– |
100% |
Lake Wells |
|||||
Central |
Granted |
– |
E38/2710 |
100% |
100% |
South |
Granted |
– |
E38/2821 |
100% |
100% |
North |
Granted |
– |
E38/2824 |
100% |
100% |
Outer East |
Granted |
– |
E38/3055 |
100% |
100% |
Single Block |
Granted |
– |
E38/3056 |
100% |
100% |
Outer West |
Granted |
– |
E38/3057 |
100% |
100% |
North West |
Granted |
– |
E38/3124 |
100% |
100% |
West |
Granted |
– |
L38/262 |
100% |
100% |
East |
Granted |
– |
L38/263 |
100% |
100% |
South West |
Granted |
– |
L38/264 |
100% |
100% |
South |
Granted |
– |
L38/287 |
100% |
100% |
South Western |
Granted |
– |
E38/3247 |
100% |
100% |
South |
Granted |
– |
M38/1278 |
100% |
100% |
Central |
Application |
Application |
E38/3380 |
– |
100% |
Lake Ballard |
|||||
West |
Granted |
– |
E29/912 |
100% |
100% |
East |
Granted |
– |
E29/913 |
100% |
100% |
North |
Granted |
– |
E29/948 |
100% |
100% |
South |
Granted |
– |
E29/958 |
100% |
100% |
South East |
Granted |
– |
E29/1011 |
100% |
100% |
South East |
Granted |
– |
E29/1020 |
100% |
100% |
South East |
Granted |
– |
E29/1021 |
100% |
100% |
South East |
Granted |
– |
E29/1022 |
100% |
100% |
South |
Application |
Application |
E29/1067 |
– |
100% |
South |
Application |
Application |
E29/1068 |
– |
100% |
North |
Application |
Application |
E29/1070 |
– |
100% |
Lake Irwin |
|||||
West |
Granted |
– |
E37/1233 |
100% |
100% |
Central |
Granted |
– |
E39/1892 |
100% |
100% |
East |
Granted |
– |
E38/3087 |
100% |
100% |
North |
Granted |
– |
E37/1261 |
100% |
100% |
Central East |
Granted |
– |
E38/3113 |
100% |
100% |
South |
Granted |
– |
E39/1955 |
100% |
100% |
North West |
Granted |
– |
E37/1260 |
100% |
100% |
South West |
Granted |
– |
E39/1956 |
100% |
100% |
Lake Minigwal |
|||||
West |
Granted |
– |
E39/1893 |
100% |
100% |
East |
Granted |
– |
E39/1894 |
100% |
100% |
Central |
Granted |
– |
E39/1962 |
100% |
100% |
Central East |
Granted |
– |
E39/1963 |
100% |
100% |
South |
Granted |
– |
E39/1964 |
100% |
100% |
South West |
Granted |
– |
E39/1965 |
100% |
100% |
Lake Marmion |
|||||
North |
Granted |
– |
E29/1000 |
100% |
100% |
Central |
Granted |
– |
E29/1001 |
100% |
100% |
South |
Granted |
– |
E29/1002 |
100% |
100% |
West |
Granted |
– |
E29/1005 |
100% |
100% |
West |
Application |
Application |
E29/1069 |
– |
100% |
Lake Noondie |
|||||
North |
Granted |
– |
E57/1062 |
100% |
100% |
Central |
Granted |
– |
E57/1063 |
100% |
100% |
South |
Granted |
– |
E57/1064 |
100% |
100% |
West |
Granted |
– |
E57/1065 |
100% |
100% |
East |
Granted |
– |
E36/932 |
100% |
100% |
Lake Barlee |
|||||
North |
Granted |
– |
E30/495 |
100% |
100% |
Central |
Granted |
– |
E30/496 |
100% |
100% |
South |
Granted |
– |
E77/2441 |
100% |
100% |
Lake Raeside |
|||||
North |
Granted |
– |
E37/1305 |
100% |
100% |
Lake Austin |
|||||
North |
Application |
– |
E21/205 |
100% |
100% |
West |
Application |
– |
E21/206 |
100% |
100% |
East |
Application |
– |
E58/529 |
100% |
100% |
South |
Application |
– |
E58/530 |
100% |
100% |
South West |
Application |
– |
E58/531 |
100% |
100% |
Lake Moore |
Granted |
– |
E59/2344 |
100% |
100% |
Northern Territory |
|||||
Lake Lewis |
|||||
South |
Granted |
– |
EL 29787 |
100% |
100% |
North |
Granted |
– |
EL 29903 |
100% |
100% |
Appendix 5B
Mining exploration entity and oil and gas exploration entity quarterly report
Introduced 01/07/96 Origin Appendix 8 Amended 01/07/97, 01/07/98, 30/09/01, 01/06/10, 17/12/10, 01/05/13, 01/09/16
Name of entity |
||
Salt Lake Potash Limited |
||
ABN |
Quarter ended (“current quarter”) |
|
98 117 085 748 |
31 March 2019 |
Consolidated statement of cash flows |
Current quarter $A’000 |
Year to date (9 months) |
||
1. |
Cash flows from operating activities |
|||
1.1 |
Receipts from customers |
|||
1.2 |
Payments for |
(2,235) |
(5,489) |
|
(a) exploration & evaluation |
||||
(b) development |
(1,129) |
(1,129) |
||
(c) production |
– |
– |
||
(d) staff costs |
(1,100) |
(2,573) |
||
(e) administration and corporate costs |
(458) |
(965) |
||
1.3 |
Dividends received (see note 3) |
– |
– |
|
1.4 |
Interest received |
62 |
115 |
|
1.5 |
Interest and other costs of finance paid |
– |
– |
|
1.6 |
Income taxes paid |
– |
– |
|
1.7 |
Research and development refunds |
– |
– |
|
1.8 |
Other (provide details if material) |
(254) |
(780) |
|
1.9 |
Net cash from / (used in) operating activities |
(5,114) |
(10,821) |
|
2. |
Cash flows from investing activities |
(56) |
(315) |
|
2.1 |
Payments to acquire: |
|||
(a) property, plant and equipment |
||||
(b) tenements (see item 10) |
– |
– |
||
(c) investments |
– |
– |
||
(d) other non-current assets |
– |
– |
||
2.2 |
Proceeds from the disposal of: |
– |
– |
|
(a) property, plant and equipment |
||||
(b) tenements (see item 10) |
– |
– |
||
(c) investments |
– |
– |
||
(d) other non-current assets |
– |
– |
||
2.3 |
Cash flows from loans to other entities |
– |
– |
|
2.4 |
Dividends received (see note 3) |
– |
– |
|
2.5 |
Other (provide details if material) |
– |
– |
|
2.6 |
Net cash from / (used in) investing activities |
(56) |
(315) |
|
3. |
Cash flows from financing activities |
– |
13,000 |
|
3.1 |
Proceeds from issues of shares |
|||
3.2 |
Proceeds from issue of convertible notes |
– |
– |
|
3.3 |
Proceeds from exercise of share options |
– |
– |
|
3.4 |
Transaction costs related to issues of shares, convertible notes or options |
(30) |
(745) |
|
3.5 |
Proceeds from borrowings |
– |
– |
|
3.6 |
Repayment of borrowings |
– |
– |
|
3.7 |
Transaction costs related to loans and borrowings |
– |
– |
|
3.8 |
Dividends paid |
– |
– |
|
3.9 |
Other (provide details if material) |
– |
– |
|
3.10 |
Net cash from / (used in) financing activities |
(30) |
12,255 |
|
4. |
Net increase / (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents for the period |
12,028 |
5,709 |
|
4.1 |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|||
4.2 |
Net cash from / (used in) operating activities (item 1.9 above) |
(5,114) |
(10,821) |
|
4.3 |
Net cash from / (used in) investing activities (item 2.6 above) |
(56) |
(315) |
|
4.4 |
Net cash from / (used in) financing activities (item 3.10 above) |
(30) |
12,255 |
|
4.5 |
Effect of movement in exchange rates on cash held |
– |
– |
|
4.6 |
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
6,828 |
6,828 |
|
5. |
Reconciliation of cash and cash equivalents |
Current quarter |
Previous quarter |
5.1 |
Bank balances |
1,635 |
2,901 |
5.2 |
Call deposits |
5,193 |
9,127 |
5.3 |
Bank overdrafts |
– |
– |
5.4 |
Other (provide details) |
– |
– |
5.5 |
Cash and cash equivalents at end of quarter (should equal item 4.6 above) |
6,828 |
12,028 |
6. |
Payments to directors of the entity and their associates |
Current quarter |
6.1 |
Aggregate amount of payments to these parties included in item 1.2 |
(169) |
6.2 |
Aggregate amount of cash flow from loans to these parties included in item 2.3 |
– |
6.3 |
Include below any explanation necessary to understand the transactions included in items 6.1 and 6.2 |
|
Payments include salaries, director and consulting fees, superannuation and provision of corporate, administration services, and a fully serviced office.
|
7. |
Payments to related entities of the entity and their associates |
Current quarter |
7.1 |
Aggregate amount of payments to these parties included in item 1.2 |
– |
7.2 |
Aggregate amount of cash flow from loans to these parties included in item 2.3 |
– |
7.3 |
Include below any explanation necessary to understand the transactions included in items 7.1 and 7.2 |
|
Not applicable.
|
8. |
Financing facilities available |
Total facility amount at quarter end |
Amount drawn at quarter end |
8.1 |
Loan facilities |
– |
– |
8.2 |
Credit standby arrangements |
– |
– |
8.3 |
Other (please specify) |
– |
– |
8.4 |
Include below a description of each facility above, including the lender, interest rate and whether it is secured or unsecured. If any additional facilities have been entered into or are proposed to be entered into after quarter end, include details of those facilities as well. |
||
Not applicable
|
9. |
Estimated cash outflows for next quarter |
$A’000 |
9.1 |
Exploration and evaluation |
2,500 |
9.2 |
Development |
2,000 |
9.3 |
Production |
– |
9.4 |
Staff costs |
1,500 |
9.5 |
Administration and corporate costs |
400 |
9.6 |
Other (provide details if material) – Exercise of Unlisted Options |
|
9.7 |
Total estimated cash outflows |
6,200 |
10. |
Changes in tenements |
Tenement reference and location |
Nature of interest |
Interest at beginning of quarter |
Interest at end of quarter |
10.1 |
Interests in mining tenements and petroleum tenements lapsed, relinquished or reduced |
Refer to Appendix 1 |
|||
10.2 |
Interests in mining tenements and petroleum tenements acquired or increased |
Compliance statement
1 This statement has been prepared in accordance with accounting standards and policies which comply with Listing Rule 19.11A.
2 This statement gives a true and fair view of the matters disclosed.
Sign here: …………………………………………………… Date: 30 April 2019
(Director/Company secretary)
Print name: Clint McGhie
Notes
1. The quarterly report provides a basis for informing the market how the entity’s activities have been financed for the past quarter and the effect on its cash position. An entity that wishes to disclose additional information is encouraged to do so, in a note or notes included in or attached to this report.
2. If this quarterly report has been prepared in accordance with Australian Accounting Standards, the definitions in, and provisions of, AASB 6: Exploration for and Evaluation of Mineral Resources and AASB 107: Statement of Cash Flows apply to this report. If this quarterly report has been prepared in accordance with other accounting standards agreed by ASX pursuant to Listing Rule 19.11A, the corresponding equivalent standards apply to this report.
3. Dividends received may be classified either as cash flows from operating activities or cash flows from investing activities, depending on the accounting policy of the entity.
END
Salt Lake Potash #SO4 announces March 2018 Quarterly Report
The Board of Salt Lake Potash Limited (the Company or SLP) is pleased to present its Quarterly Report for the period ending 31 March 2018.
The Company’s primary focus is to construct a Demonstration Plant at the Goldfields Salt Lakes Project (GSLP), intended to be the first salt-lake brine Sulphate of Potash (SOP) production operation in Australia.
Highlights for the quarter and subsequently include:
LAKE WAY
MOU with Blackham Resources to access Lake Way
Ø The Company entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with Blackham Resources Limited (Blackham) to investigate the potential development of a SOP operation based at Lake Way, near Wiluna.
Surface Sampling Program
Ø A preliminary surface sampling program on Blackham’s tenements confirms the average SOP grade of over 14kg/m3, making Lake Way one of Australia’s highest grade SOP brine sources.
Geotechnical Investigations
Ø An initial geological and geotechnical investigation by the Company and Knight Piesold confirmed the availability of in-situ clays amendable for on-lake evaporation pond construction. A total of 24 auger holes were excavated across Blackham’s tenements and laboratory tested.
Surface Aquifer Exploration
Ø Review and modelling of the large volume of historical exploration data for Lake Way confirms the likelihood of a large hypersaline brine pool on both Blackham and SLP’s tenements.
Ø The Company is in the process of mobilising a drill rig and an amphibious excavator on the Lake to complete an initial surface aquifer exploration program.
Ø The surface aquifer program will include the construction of test pits and trenches for long-term pump testing.
Process Testwork
Ø The Company has commenced a range of process development testwork including process pathway modelling by international experts, a bulk sample evaporation trial and site-based evaporation trial at Lake Way.
First MOU for an Offtake Agreement with Mitsubishi
Ø The Company executed its first MOU for an Offtake Agreement with Mitsubishi, for the sales and offtake rights for up to 50% of the SOP production, from a Demonstration Plant at the GSLP, for distribution into Asia and Oceania and potentially other markets.
LAKE WELLS
Process Testwork
Ø The Saskatchewan Research Council (SRC) completed locked cycle testwork utilising 1T of harvest salts from Lake Wells SET to produce 400kg of flotation concentrate. The flotation concentrate is scheduled for crystalliser design testwork in the USA.
Ø The Site Evaporation Trial (SET) at Lake Wells was decommissioned after completing over 18 months of operation under site conditions and through all seasons. The SET processed approximately 412 tonnes of brine and produced over 10 tonnes of harvest salts.
LAKE IRWIN
Ø A surface aquifer exploration program was continued at Lake Irwin, with additional 29 shallow test pits and 2 test trenches. This work provides preliminary data for the geological and hydrological models of the surface aquifer of the Lake, as well as brine, geological and geotechnical samples.
GSLP’s World Class Scale Revealed with an Initial Exploration Target Estimation
The Company released an initial estimate of Exploration Targets for eight of the nine lakes comprising the Company’s GSLP. The ninth lake, Lake Wells, already having a Mineral Resource reported in accordance with the JORC code.
The total “stored” Exploration Target for the GSLP is 290Mt – 458Mt of contained Sulphate of Potash (SOP) with an average SOP grade of 4.4 – 7.1kg/m3 (including Lake Wells’ Mineral Resource of 80-85Mt). On a “drainable” basis the total Exploration Target ranges from 26Mt – 153Mt of SOP. The total playa area of the lakes is approximately 3,312km2.
The potential quantity and grade of this Exploration Target is conceptual in nature. There has been insufficient exploration to estimate a Mineral Resource and it is uncertain if further exploration will result in the estimation of a Mineral Resource.
The Company’s long term plan is to develop an integrated SOP operation, producing from a number (or all) of the lakes within the GSLP, after confirming the technical and commercial elements of the Project through construction and operation of a Demonstration Plant producing up to 50,000tpa of SOP.
The Company’s recent Memorandum of Understanding with Blackham Resources Limited (see ASX Announcement dated 12 March 2018) offers the potential for an expedited path to development at Lake Way, possibly the best site for a 50,000tpa Demonstration Plant in Australia.
The GSLP has a number of very important, favourable characteristics:
Ø Very large paleochannel hosted brine aquifers, with chemistry amenable to evaporation of salts for SOP production, extractable from both low cost trenches and deeper bores;
Ø Over 3,300km2 of playa surface, with in-situ clays suitable for low cost on-lake pond construction;
Ø Excellent evaporation conditions;
Ø Excellent access to transport, energy and other infrastructure in the major Goldfields mining district;
Ø Lowest quartile capex and opex potential based on the Lake Wells Scoping Study;
Ø Clear opportunity to reduce transport costs by developing lakes closer to infrastructure and by capturing economies of scale;
Ø Multi-lake production offers operational flexibility and protection from localised weather events;
Ø The very high level of technical validation already undertaken at Lake Wells substantially applies to the other lakes in the GSLP; and
Ø Potential co-product revenues, particularly where transport costs are lowest.
Salt Lake Potash will progressively explore the lakes in the portfolio with a view to estimating resources for each Lake, in parallel with the development of the Demonstration Plant. Exploration of the lakes will be prioritised based on likely transport costs, scale, permitting pathway and brine chemistry.
LAKE WAY
Lake Way is located in the Goldfields region of Western Australia, less than 15km south of Wiluna. The surface area of the Lake is over 270km2.
The Wiluna region is an historic mining precinct dating back to the late 19th century. It has been a prolific nickel and gold mining region and therefore has well developed, high quality infrastructure in place.
The Goldfields Highway is a high quality sealed road permitted to carry quad road trains and passes 2km from the Lake. The Goldfields Gas Pipeline is adjacent to SLP’s tenements, running past the eastern side of the Lake.
SLP has entered an MOU with Blackham to investigate the development of an SOP operation on Blackham’s existing Mining Leases at Lake Way, including initially a 50,000tpa Demonstration Plant (see announcement dated 12 March 2018).
Lake Way has some compelling advantages which make it potentially an ideal site for an SOP operation, including:
Ø Substantial likely capital and operating savings from sharing overheads and infrastructure with the Wiluna Gold Mine, including the accommodation camp, flights, power, maintenance, infrastructure and other costs.
Ø The site has an excellent freight solution, adjacent to the Goldfields Highway, which is permitted for heavy haulage 4 trailer road trains to the railhead at Leonora.
Ø A Demonstration Plant would likely be built on Blackham’s existing Mining Licences, already subject of a Native Title Agreement.
Ø SLP would dewater the existing Williamson Pit on Lake Way, prior to Blackham mining, planned for early 2019. The pit contains an estimated 1.2GL of brine at the exceptional grade of 25kg/m3 of SOP. This brine is potentially the ideal starter feed for evaporation ponds, having already evaporated from the normal Lake Way brine grade, which averages over 14kg/m3.
Ø The high grade brines at Lake Way will result in lower capital and operating costs due to lower extraction and evaporation requirements.
Ø There would be substantial savings to both parties from co-operating on exploration activities on each other’s ground.
Ø The presence of clays in the upper levels of the lake which should be amenable to low cost, on-lake evaporation pond construction.
SLP will complete a Scoping Study for a potential SOP operation at Lake Way, including a Demonstration Plant, by mid-2018, in time to allow a decision on dewatering the Williamson Pit. There is substantial historical data available for Lake Way and, along with the extensive, high quality technical work undertaken at SLP’s other lakes, which has substantial application at Lake Way, a Scoping Study can be undertaken in a much shorter timeframe than would normally be the case.
Surface Sampling Program
The Company has now completed initial surface sampling program at Lake Way, substantially covering the Lake surface. A total of 23 pit samples have been collected encountering brine at a standing water level generally less than 1 metre from surface.
The average brine chemistry of the samples was:
Total |
K |
Mg |
SO4 |
TDS |
SOP* |
||
Program |
Location |
(mg/L) |
(mg/L) |
(mg/L) |
(mg/L) |
(kg/m3) |
|
March 2018 |
Blackham |
15 |
6,447 |
6,680 |
25,613 |
231,000 |
14.38 |
November 2017 |
SLP |
8 |
6,859 |
7,734 |
25,900 |
243,000 |
15.25 |
* Conversion factor of K to SOP (K2SO4 equivalent) is 2.23
[1] Previously reported in ASX release dated 12/12/2017
The brine chemistry at Lake Way is very consistent over the lake surface. The SOP grades are amongst the highest achieved in Australia to date.
Geotechnical Investigations
To gain an understanding of ground conditions for trenching and pond construction, a preliminary geotechnical investigation program was undertaken within the Blackham Mining Tenements, in conjunction with leading international geotechnical consultants, Knight Piesold.
A total of 24 hand auger boreholes were drilled to depths of up to 3.2 metres, and the encountered soils were logged and sampled.
Lake Way ground conditions consists of a thin surface layer of evaporite sands, overlying sandy and silty clays. Firm clays were encountered at 1m to 2m depth, generally increasing in strength with depth, becoming hard from 2m to 3m. Shallow groundwater was encountered on average 0.2m below the lake surface.
A testing program was undertaken at a NATA accredited geotechnical laboratory, using specific test methods appropriate for saline conditions, to characterise soils and assess preliminary soil parameters.
Summary test results are presented below.
Particle Size Distribution Analysis |
|||
Sample Number |
Lithological Unit |
Clay and Silt |
Sand and Gravel |
601 |
Mixed soils above 1.5m |
26% |
74% |
602 |
Clay 1.2m to 2.25m depth |
71% |
29% |
603 |
Mixed soils above 1.5m |
47% |
53% |
604 |
Mixed soils above 1.5m |
47% |
53% |
Table 2: Particle Size Distribution Analysis
Hydrometer Analysis |
||||
Sample Number |
Lithological Unit |
Clay |
Silt |
Sand |
600 |
Mixed soils above 1.8m |
58% |
20% |
22% |
605 |
Mixed soils above 0.5m |
29% |
30% |
41% |
606 |
Mixed soils above 1.8m |
28% |
27% |
45% |
Table 3: Hydrometer Analysis
Properties of Upper Clays |
|
Remoulded Permeability (m/s) |
5×10-10 |
Maximum Dry Density (t/m3) |
1.75 |
Optimum Water Content (%) |
18 |
Cohesion c’ (kPa) |
1 |
Angle of Shear Resistance ф ‘ (Deg) |
37 |
Table 4: Properties of Upper Clays
Erodibility characteristics were tested and an Emerson class number of 6 was measured for all samples. This indicates non-dispersive soils that are not prone to erosion when used to form embankments.
Based on the preliminary geotechnical work to date, Knight Piesold have concluded that:
– the in-situ clay materials can be expected to provide natural low permeability layers to control seepage of on-lake ponds.
– the clays are suitable for embankment construction purposes, with adequate moisture control and borrow pit dewatering.
– A key advantage of Lake Way is the presence of a drier clay zone surrounding the Williamson Pit, which has the potential to provide borrow materials and construction schedule benefits for the upcoming pond construction programs.
Knight Piesold is now preparing an options study to evaluate design concepts for large-scale pond systems and provide earthworks quantities and costs. Seepage assessments and flood studies are underway. In parallel, design work is being undertaken for a dewatering pond to hold the Williamson Pit brine.
Surface Aquifer Characterisation
Lake Way and its surrounds have been the subject of a substantial amount of historical exploration for gold, nickel, uranium and other minerals, as well as for process water for mining operations. A total of over 2,800 holes have been drilled in and around the Lake previously, providing a very large database of geotechnical information.
SLP have commenced compiling, digitising and interpreting the historical exploration database to extract relevant data and provide initial basement geometry for the Lake area, to assist estimation of an initial JORC compliant resource.
The Company is also in the process of mobilising a small track-mounted drill rig and an amphibious excavator to complete an initial surface aquifer exploration program. This work will provide critical data for the hydrogeological model for the surface aquifer of the Lake, as well as geological and geotechnical information for infrastructure design and construction.
The surface aquifer program will include the construction of test pits and trenches for long-term pump testing.
The drill campaign is also intended to sterilise (for gold exploration) sufficient areas for siting brine extraction trenches and evaporation ponds.
Process Testwork
The Company has commenced a range of process development testwork to provide and validate inputs to the Lake Way Scoping Study production model. Naturally, this includes testing brines from the Lake itself, as well as the super-concentrated brines from the Williamson Pit.
The testwork aims to confirm the modelled brine evaporation pathways firstly under laboratory simulated conditions and then from a site-based trial of sufficient scale to test on-lake evaporation conditions.
Initial brine evaporation modelling, conducted by internationally renowned solar pond experts, Ad Infinitum, indicates the salts produced at Lake Way will be comparable to those produced at Lake Wells and therefore suitable for conversion into SOP.
International laboratory and testing company, Bureau Veritas (BV), has commenced a series of laboratory-scale brine evaporation trials at their Perth facility, under simulated average Lake Way climate conditions. The aim of the BV trials is to monitor the chemical composition of the brine and salts produced through the evaporation process to confirm:
· Concentration thresholds in the brine chemistry which can be used to maximise the recovery of potassium in the harvest salts and minimise the quantity of dilutive salts fed to a process plant;
· The quantity and composition of harvest salts which will for the plant feed in commercial production; and
· The potential for any internal evaporation pond recycle streams that may improve harvest salt recovery.
Two tests – one for Williamson Pit brine and one for normal Lake Way brine – are currently underway, each evaporating 150kg of brine on a load cell to monitor evaporative loss. The temperature of the brine and air flow across the brine surface is controlled by using infra-red lamps and fans to simulate Lake Way average weather conditions.
A Site Evaporation Trial (SET), as successfully operated at Lake Wells previously, is under construction at Lake Way and will be filled with first brine over the next week. The SET will gather specific evaporation data on concentrated brines under actual conditions, providing refinements to the commercial scale pond modelling.
The Site Evaporation Trial is also designed to produce sufficient harvest salt for confirmatory process testwork and initial customer samples.
GOLDFIELDS SALT LAKES PROJECT
MOU for Offtake with Mitsubishi
The Company executed a MOU for an Offtake Agreement with Mitsubishi for the sales and offtake rights for up to 50% of the SOP production from a Demonstration Plant at the GSLP, for distribution into Asia and Oceania and potentially other markets.
Salt Lake Potash is progressing its GSLP development strategy, initially involving construction of a Demonstration Plant producing up to 50,000tpa of high quality SOP, with it plans to distribute production through a small number of global distribution partnerships.
The Mitsubishi MOU is non-binding and sets out the key terms for a subsequent formal Offtake Agreement as the Demonstration Plant is developed. As well as quantities and target markets, the MOU’s other terms include:
· Market pricing and commission mechanisms;
· Specifications and delivery parameters;
· Mitsubishi to provide strategic advice on marketing within the region; and
· The parties to continue discussions regarding funding requirements for the GSLP.
Mitsubishi Australia Limited is a wholly owned subsidiary of Mitsubishi Corporation. Mitsubishi is one of the world’s largest trading and investment enterprises that develops and operates businesses across virtually every industry, including industrial finance, energy, metals, machinery, chemicals, and daily living essentials. Its current activities expand far beyond its traditional trading operations to include investments and business management in diverse fields including natural resources development, manufacturing of industrial goods, retail, new energy, infrastructure, finance and new technology-related businesses.
Exploration Target
The Company completed an initial estimate of Exploration Targets for eight of the nine lakes comprising the Company’s GSLP. The ninth lake, Lake Wells, already having a Mineral Resource reported in accordance with the JORC code.
The total “stored” Exploration Target for the GSLP is 290Mt – 458Mt of contained Sulphate of Potash (SOP) with an average SOP grade of 4.4 – 7.1kg/m3 (including Lake Wells’ Mineral Resource of 80-85Mt). On a “drainable” basis the total Exploration Target ranges from 26Mt – 153Mt of SOP. The total playa area of the lakes is approximately 3,312km2.
The potential quantity and grade of this Exploration Target is conceptual in nature. There has been insufficient exploration to estimate a Mineral Resource and it is uncertain if further exploration will result in the estimation of a Mineral Resource.
Area |
Average Grade (kg/m3) |
Stored (Mt) |
Drainable (Mt) |
||||
Lake |
(km2) |
SOP (min) |
SOP (max) |
SOP (min) |
SOP (max) |
SOP (min) |
SOP (max) |
Ballard |
626 |
3.5 |
4.7 |
42 |
53 |
3.1 |
18 |
Barlee |
350 |
1.9 |
4.3 |
10 |
21 |
0.8 |
8.1 |
Irwin |
306 |
4.8 |
8.1 |
25 |
43 |
1.9 |
15 |
Marmion |
339 |
3.0 |
5.1 |
20 |
34 |
1.6 |
11 |
Minigwal |
567 |
3.8 |
8.3 |
45 |
98 |
3.4 |
31 |
Noondie |
386 |
4.2 |
6.0 |
35 |
50 |
2.8 |
16 |
Raeside |
89 |
2.1 |
7.0 |
6 |
20 |
0.4 |
5.4 |
Way |
172 |
5.6 |
15.5 |
28 |
54 |
2.7 |
19 |
Wells |
477 |
8.7 |
8.8 |
801 |
851 |
92 |
292 |
Total |
3,312 |
4.4 |
7.1 |
290 |
458 |
26 |
153 |
1. Incorporating Lake Wells’ stored Mineral Resource Estimate previously reported.
2. Lake Wells Mineral stored Mineral Resource Estimate converted to drainable equivalent.
Table 5: GSLP Exploration Target
The combined resources and exploration targets in the GSLP comprise a globally significant Project in the SOP sector, potentially sustaining one of the world’s largest SOP production operations for many decades.
LAKE WELLS
Process Testwork
The Company continues a range of process development testwork to enhance the Lake Wells process model.
Site Evaporation Trial
The large scale, continuous Site Evaporation Trial (SET) at Lake Wells successfully completed over 18 months of operation under site conditions and through all seasons, confirming the solar evaporation pathway for production of potassium rich harvest salts for processing into SOP. The SET was decommissioned after achieving its objective of refining process design criteria for the halite evaporation ponds and subsequent harvest salt ponds.
The SET processed approximately 412 tonnes of Lake Wells brine and produced 10.3 tonnes of harvest salts.
The results of the SET are Australian first and have provided significant knowledge to the Company on the salt crystallisation pathway under site conditions in Australia.
Process Development
The Saskatchewan Research Council (SRC) completed a locked-cycle, continuous production test on 1T of harvest salt generated by the Lake Wells SET during the quarter. The aims of the test were to operate the proposed pre-crystallisation portion of the GSLP Flowsheet on a continuous basis, over a number of weeks, to quantify brine handling requirements in the process flowsheet and obtain product purity information.
The locked-cycle test produced 400kg of flotation concentrate (Schoenite) for crystalliser vendor testing and 3kg of SOP for marketing purposes. The product quality produced by SRC from the locked-cycle test was exceptional, exceeding quality benchmarks for commercial SOP.
The 400kg of flotation concentrate has been shipped to a leading crystalliser vendor in the United States for batch design testwork and product characterisation. The testwork is expected to be completed in the June quarter.
LAKE IRWIN
Surface Aquifer Exploration Program
Following the initial trench development in 2017, the Company returned to Lake Irwin with the amphibious excavator to undertake a program of test pits and additional trench excavation.
A total of 29 additional pits were excavated across the lake surface to provide geological control, 12 of these pits were slug tested to obtain bulk hydraulic conductivity parameters for the lakebed sediments.
Two additional trenches were excavated at the western and eastern ends of the Lake respectively to a length of approximately 100m and a depth of 4m. These two new trenches together with the existing trenches will be test pumped during the next quarter to determine hydraulic conductivity and specific yield.
LAKE BALLARD
During the quarter, the Company received confirmation from the Minister for Finance, Energy and Aboriginal Affairs that the Company’s Section 18 application over the Lake Ballard and Lake Marmion projects had been granted. The granting of the Section 18 allows SLP to recommence exploration activities at the Lake.
Competent Persons Statement
The information in this report that relates to Exploration Results for Lake Irwin is based on information compiled by Mr Ben Jeuken, who is a member Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. Mr Jeuken is employed by Groundwater Science Pty Ltd, an independent consulting company. Mr Jeuken has sufficient experience, which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity, which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Mr Jeuken consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.
The information in this Announcement that relates to Exploration Results for Lake Way is extracted from the report entitled ‘Initial Results Confirm Lake Way Potential’ dated 26 April 2018 and ‘Emerging World Class SOP Potential Supported by Lake Way’ dated 12 December 2017. The information in the original ASX Announcement that related to Exploration Results, for Lake Way is based on information compiled by Mr Ben Jeuken, who is a member Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. Mr Jeuken is employed by Groundwater Science Pty Ltd, an independent consulting company. Mr Jeuken has sufficient experience, which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity, which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Mr Jeuken consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears. The Company confirms that it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in the original market announcement. The Company confirms that the form and context in which the Competent Person’s findings are presented have not been materially modified from the original market announcement
The information in this report that relates to Exploration Targets or Mineral Resources is extracted from the report entitled ‘Exploration Targets Reveal World Class Scale Potential’ dated 28 March 2018 The information in the original ASX Announcement that related to Exploration Targets or Mineral Resources is based on information compiled by Mr Ben Jeuken, who is a member Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. Mr Jeuken is employed by Groundwater Science Pty Ltd, an independent consulting company. Mr Jeuken has sufficient experience, which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity, which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Mr Jeuken consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears. The Company confirms that it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in the original market announcement. The Company confirms that the form and context in which the Competent Person’s findings are presented have not been materially modified from the original market announcement
The information in this report that relates to Process Testwork Results is based on, and fairly represents, information compiled by Mr Bryn Jones, BAppSc (Chem), MEng (Mining) who is a Fellow of the AusIMM, a ‘Recognised Professional Organisation’ (RPO) included in a list promulgated by the ASX from time to time. Mr Jones is a Director of Salt Potash Limited. Mr Jones has sufficient experience, which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking, to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Mr Jones consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.
Table 6 – Summary of Exploration and Mining Tenements
As at 31 March 2018, the Company holds interests in the following tenements:
Australian Projects:
Western Australia |
|||||||||||||||
Lake Wells |
|||||||||||||||
Central |
Granted |
– |
E38/2710 |
192.2 |
5 years |
05-Sep-12 |
4-Sep-17 |
100% |
100% |
||||||
South |
Granted |
– |
E38/2821 |
131.5 |
5 years |
19-Nov-13 |
18-Nov-18 |
100% |
100% |
||||||
North |
Granted |
– |
E38/2824 |
198.2 |
5 years |
04-Nov-13 |
3-Nov-18 |
100% |
100% |
||||||
Outer East |
Granted |
– |
E38/3055 |
298.8 |
5 years |
16-Oct-15 |
16-Oct-20 |
100% |
100% |
||||||
Single Block |
Granted |
– |
E38/3056 |
3.0 |
5 years |
16-Oct-15 |
16-Oct-20 |
100% |
100% |
||||||
Outer West |
Granted |
– |
E38/3057 |
301.9 |
5 years |
16-Oct-15 |
16-Oct-20 |
100% |
100% |
||||||
North West |
Granted |
– |
E38/3124 |
39.0 |
5 years |
30-Nov-16 |
29-Nov-21 |
100% |
100% |
||||||
West |
Granted |
– |
L38/262 |
113.0 |
20 years |
3-Feb-17 |
2-Feb-38 |
100% |
100% |
||||||
East |
Granted |
– |
L38/263 |
28.6 |
20 years |
3-Feb-17 |
2-Feb-38 |
100% |
100% |
||||||
South West |
Granted |
– |
L38/264 |
32.6 |
20 years |
3-Feb-17 |
2-Feb-38 |
100% |
100% |
||||||
South |
Application |
– |
L38/287 |
95.8 |
– |
– |
– |
100% |
100% |
||||||
South Western |
Granted |
Granted |
E38/3247 |
350.3 |
5 years |
25-Jan-18 |
24-Jan-23 |
100% |
100% |
||||||
South |
Application |
– |
M38/1278 |
87.47 |
– |
– |
– |
100% |
100% |
||||||
Lake Ballard |
|||||||||||||||
West |
Granted |
– |
E29/912 |
607.0 |
5 years |
10-Apr-15 |
10-Apr-20 |
100% |
100% |
||||||
East |
Granted |
– |
E29/913 |
73.2 |
5 years |
10-Apr-15 |
10-Apr-20 |
100% |
100% |
||||||
North |
Granted |
– |
E29/948 |
94.5 |
5 years |
22-Sep-15 |
21-Sep-20 |
100% |
100% |
||||||
South |
Granted |
– |
E29/958 |
30.0 |
5 years |
20-Jan-16 |
19-Jan-21 |
100% |
100% |
||||||
South East |
Granted |
– |
E29/1011 |
68.2 |
5 years |
11-Aug-17 |
10-Aug-22 |
100% |
100% |
||||||
South East |
Granted |
Granted |
E29/1020 |
9.3 |
5 years |
21-Feb-18 |
20-Feb-23 |
100% |
100% |
||||||
South East |
Granted |
Granted |
E29/1021 |
27.9 |
5 years |
21-Feb-18 |
20-Feb-23 |
100% |
100% |
||||||
South East |
Granted |
Granted |
E29/1022 |
43.4 |
5 years |
21-Feb-18 |
20-Feb-23 |
100% |
100% |
||||||
Lake Irwin |
|||||||||||||||
West |
Granted |
– |
E37/1233 |
203.0 |
5 years |
08-Mar-16 |
07-Mar-21 |
100% |
100% |
||||||
Central |
Granted |
– |
E39/1892 |
203.0 |
5 years |
23-Mar-16 |
22-Mar-21 |
100% |
100% |
||||||
East |
Granted |
– |
E38/3087 |
139.2 |
5 years |
23-Mar-16 |
22-Mar-21 |
100% |
100% |
||||||
North |
Granted |
– |
E37/1261 |
107.3 |
5 years |
14-Oct-16 |
13-Oct-21 |
100% |
100% |
||||||
Central East |
Granted |
– |
E38/3113 |
203.0 |
5 years |
14-Oct-16 |
13-Oct-21 |
100% |
100% |
||||||
South |
Granted |
– |
E39/1955 |
118.9 |
5 years |
14-Oct-16 |
13-Oct-21 |
100% |
100% |
||||||
North West |
Application |
– |
E37/1260 |
203.0 |
– |
– |
– |
100% |
100% |
||||||
South West |
Application |
– |
E39/1956 |
110.2 |
– |
– |
– |
100% |
100% |
||||||
Lake Minigwal |
|||||||||||||||
West |
Granted |
– |
E39/1893 |
246.2 |
5 years |
01-Apr-16 |
31-Mar-21 |
100% |
100% |
||||||
East |
Granted |
– |
E39/1894 |
158.1 |
5 years |
01-Apr-16 |
31-Mar-21 |
100% |
100% |
||||||
Central |
Granted |
– |
E39/1962 |
369.0 |
5 years |
8-Nov-16 |
7-Nov-21 |
100% |
100% |
||||||
Central East |
Granted |
– |
E39/1963 |
93.0 |
5 years |
8-Nov-16 |
7-Nov-21 |
100% |
100% |
||||||
South |
Granted |
– |
E39/1964 |
99.0 |
5 years |
8-Nov-16 |
7-Nov-21 |
100% |
100% |
||||||
South West |
Application |
– |
E39/1965 |
89.9 |
– |
– |
– |
100% |
100% |
||||||
Lake Way |
|||||||||||||||
Central |
Granted |
– |
E53/1878 |
217.0 |
5 years |
12-Oct-16 |
11-Oct-21 |
100% |
100% |
||||||
South |
Application |
– |
E53/1897 |
77.5 |
– |
– |
– |
100% |
100% |
||||||
Lake Marmion |
|||||||||||||||
North |
Granted |
– |
E29/1000 |
167.4 |
5 years |
03-Apr-17 |
02-Apr-22 |
100% |
100% |
||||||
Central |
Granted |
– |
E29/1001 |
204.6 |
5 years |
03-Apr-17 |
02-Apr-22 |
100% |
100% |
||||||
South |
Granted |
– |
E29/1002 |
186.0 |
5 years |
15-Aug-17 |
14-Aug-22 |
100% |
100% |
||||||
West |
Granted |
– |
E29/1005 |
68.2 |
5 years |
11-Jul-17 |
10-Jul-22 |
100% |
100% |
||||||
Lake Noondie |
|||||||||||||||
North |
Application |
– |
E57/1062 |
217.0 |
– |
– |
– |
100% |
100% |
||||||
Central |
Application |
– |
E57/1063 |
217.0 |
– |
– |
– |
100% |
100% |
||||||
South |
Application |
– |
E57/1064 |
55.8 |
– |
– |
– |
100% |
100% |
||||||
West |
Application |
– |
E57/1065 |
120.9 |
– |
– |
– |
100% |
100% |
||||||
East |
Application |
– |
E36/932 |
108.5 |
– |
– |
– |
100% |
100% |
||||||
Lake Barlee |
|||||||||||||||
North |
Application |
– |
E49/495 |
217.0 |
– |
– |
– |
100% |
100% |
||||||
Central |
Granted |
– |
E49/496 |
220.1 |
5 years |
17-Dec-17 |
16-Dec-22 |
100% |
100% |
||||||
South |
Granted |
– |
E77/2441 |
173.6 |
5 years |
09-Oct-17 |
08-Oct-22 |
100% |
100% |
||||||
Lake Raeside |
|||||||||||||||
North |
Application |
– |
E37/1305 |
155.0 |
– |
– |
– |
100% |
100% |
||||||
Lake Austin |
|||||||||||||||
West |
Application |
Application Lodged |
E21/205 |
117.8 |
– |
– |
– |
– |
100% |
||||||
West |
Application |
Application Lodged |
E21/206 |
192.2 |
– |
– |
– |
– |
100% |
||||||
West |
Application |
Application Lodged |
E58/529 |
213.9 |
– |
– |
– |
– |
100% |
||||||
West |
Application |
Application Lodged |
E58/530 |
217.0 |
– |
– |
– |
– |
100% |
||||||
West |
Application |
Application Lodged |
E58/531 |
96.1 |
– |
– |
– |
– |
100% |
||||||
Northern Territory |
|||||||||||||||
Lake Lewis |
|||||||||||||||
South |
Granted |
– |
EL 29787 |
146.4 |
6 years |
08-Jul-13 |
7-Jul-19 |
100% |
100% |
||||||
North |
Granted |
– |
EL 29903 |
125.1 |
6 years |
21-Feb-14 |
20-Feb-19 |
100% |
100% |
||||||
APPENDIX 1 – LAKE IRWIN TEST PIT LOCATION DATA
Hole_ID |
East |
North |
EOH |
Hole_ID |
East |
North |
EOH |
|
LITT028 |
370167 |
6905453 |
6.0 |
LITT043 |
369662 |
6904489 |
6.0 |
|
LITT029 |
370157 |
6905023 |
6.0 |
LITT044 |
369176 |
6904645 |
6.0 |
|
LITT030 |
370131 |
6904535 |
6.0 |
LITT045 |
368564 |
6904252 |
6.0 |
|
LITT031 |
370311 |
6904080 |
6.0 |
LITT046 |
368059 |
6904105 |
2.0 |
|
LITT032 |
370711 |
6903601 |
6.0 |
LITT047 |
367550 |
6903968 |
2.0 |
|
LITT033 |
371017 |
6903199 |
6.0 |
LITT048 |
367055 |
6903816 |
3.0 |
|
LITT034 |
370781 |
6902715 |
6.0 |
LITT049 |
366565 |
6903685 |
3.0 |
|
LITT035 |
370842 |
6902214 |
6.0 |
LITT050 |
366090 |
6903526 |
3.0 |
|
LITT036 |
371196 |
6901816 |
6.0 |
LITT051 |
365629 |
6903326 |
3.0 |
|
LITT037 |
371632 |
6901572 |
6.0 |
LITT052 |
365153 |
6903175 |
4.0 |
|
LITT038 |
371799 |
6901412 |
6.0 |
LITT053 |
364294 |
6904675 |
4.5 |
|
LITT039 |
371956 |
6901902 |
6.0 |
LITT054 |
363879 |
6904397 |
4.0 |
|
LITT040 |
371672 |
6902319 |
6.0 |
LITT055 |
363459 |
6904124 |
4.0 |
|
LITT041 |
371415 |
6902727 |
6.0 |
LITT056 |
362109 |
6903462 |
6.0 |
|
LITT042 |
370518 |
6905194 |
6.0 |
APPENDIX 2 – LAKE IRWIN BRINE CHEMISTRY ANALYSIS
HOLE ID |
From (m) |
To (m) |
K (mg/L) |
Cl (mg/L) |
Na (mg/L) |
Ca (mg/L) |
Mg (mg/L) |
SO4 (mg/L) |
TDS (g/L) |
LITT045 |
0 |
6.0 |
3,040 |
155,150 |
95,200 |
490 |
5,830 |
21,800 |
243 |
LITT046 |
0 |
6.0 |
3,410 |
153,600 |
96,800 |
481 |
5,300 |
22,000 |
243 |
LITT047 |
0 |
6.0 |
3,200 |
153,050 |
97,200 |
462 |
6,050 |
23,500 |
244 |
LITT048 |
0 |
6.0 |
3,160 |
153,250 |
95,700 |
465 |
6,470 |
24,500 |
244 |
LITT049 |
0 |
6.0 |
3,070 |
153,750 |
96,900 |
455 |
6,780 |
24,800 |
247 |
LITT050 |
0 |
6.0 |
3,050 |
152,550 |
96,000 |
450 |
6,240 |
24,500 |
254 |
LITT051 |
0 |
6.0 |
3,240 |
156,550 |
98,200 |
448 |
5,930 |
23,900 |
248 |
LITT052 |
0 |
6.0 |
3,150 |
155,700 |
98,200 |
444 |
6,270 |
24,500 |
247 |
LITT053 |
0 |
6.0 |
3,430 |
161,950 |
101,000 |
452 |
6,550 |
23,400 |
254 |
LITT054 |
0 |
6.0 |
3,360 |
153,400 |
97,100 |
512 |
5,480 |
21,700 |
242 |
LITT055 |
0 |
6.0 |
3,290 |
155,150 |
98,300 |
514 |
5,660 |
21,200 |
244 |
LITT056 |
0 |
6.0 |
3,770 |
160,050 |
98,900 |
430 |
6,000 |
23,600 |
251 |
APPENDIX 3 – JORC TABLE ONE
Section 1: Sampling Techniques and Data
Criteria |
JORC Code explanation |
Commentary |
Sampling techniques |
Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels, random chips, or specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling. Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used. Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public Report. In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has been done this would be relatively simple (eg ‘reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay’). In other cases more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (eg submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information. |
Lake Irwin Geological samples were obtained from the excavator bucket at regular depth intervals. Brine samples were taken from the discharge of trench dewatering pumps.
|
Drilling techniques |
Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (eg core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc). |
Lake Irwin Excavation with a low ground pressure excavator.
|
Drill sample recovery |
Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries and results assessed. Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure representative nature of the samples. Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material. |
Lake Irwin Not applicable for trenching.
|
Logging |
Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies. Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc) photography. The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged. |
Lake Irwin All trenches and test pits were geologically logged qualitatively by a qualified geologist, noting in particular moisture content of sediments, lithology, colour, induration, grainsize and shape, matrix and structural observations. Flow rate data was logged to note water inflow zones.
|
Sub-sampling techniques and sample preparation |
If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core taken. If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc and whether sampled wet or dry. For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample preparation technique. Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages to maximise representivity of samples. Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in situ material collected, including for instance results for field duplicate/second-half sampling. Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being sampled. |
Lake Irwin Brine samples were taken from the discharge of trench dewatering pumps. Sample bottles are rinsed with brine which is discarded prior to sampling. All brine samples taken in the field are split into two sub-samples: primary and duplicate. Reference samples were analysed at a separate laboratory for QA/QC. Representative chip trays and bulk lithological samples are kept for records.
|
Quality of assay data and laboratory tests |
The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or total. For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc, the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc. Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (ie lack of bias) and precision have been established. |
Primary samples were sent to Bureau Veritas Minerals Laboratory, Perth. Brine samples were analysed using ICP-AES for K, Na, Mg, Ca, with chloride determined by Mohr titration and alkalinity determined volumetrically. Sulphate was calculated from the ICP-AES sulphur analysis.
|
Verification of sampling and assaying |
The verification of significant intersections by either independent or alternative company personnel. The use of twinned holes. Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols. Discuss any adjustment to assay data. |
Data entry is done in the field to minimise transposition errors. Brine assay results are received from the laboratory in digital format, these data sets are subject to the quality control described above. All laboratory results are entered in to the company’s database and validation completed. Independent verification of significant intercepts was not considered warranted given the relatively consistent nature of the brine. |
Location of data points |
Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource estimation. Specification of the grid system used. Quality and adequacy of topographic control. |
Trench and test pit co-ordinates were captured using hand held GPS. Coordinates were provided in GDA 94_MGA Zone 51. Topographic control is obtained using Geoscience Australia’s 1-second digital elevation product.
|
Data spacing and distribution |
Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results. Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied. Whether sample compositing has been applied. |
Lake Irwin Trench hole spacing is shown on the attached maps and varies due to irregular access along the lake edge.
|
Orientation of data in relation to geological structure |
Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of possible structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the deposit type. If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material. |
Lake Irwin Trenches and test pits were vertical. Geological structure is considered to be flat lying.
|
Sample security |
The measures taken to ensure sample security. |
All brine samples were marked and kept onsite before transport to the laboratory. All remaining sample and duplicates are stored in the Perth office in climate-controlled conditions. Chain of Custody system is maintained. |
Audits or reviews |
The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data. |
No audits were undertaken. |
Section 2: Reporting of Exploration Results
Criteria |
JORC Code explanation |
Commentary |
Mineral tenement and land tenure status |
Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmental settings. The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area.
|
Lake Irwin Tenements sampled 37/1233, 38/3087 and 39/1892 in Western Australia. Exploration Licenses are held by Piper Preston Pty Ltd (fully owned subsidiary of ASLP). |
Exploration done by other parties |
Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties. |
Details are presented in the report.
|
Geology |
Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation. |
Salt Lake Brine Deposit
|
Drill hole Information |
A summary of all information material to the understanding of the exploration results including a tabulation of the following information for all Material drill holes: o easting and northing of the drill hole collar o elevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevation above sea level in metres) of the drill hole collar o dip and azimuth of the hole o down hole length and interception depth o hole length. If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that the information is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from the understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly explain why this is the case. |
Details are presented in the report.
|
Data aggregation methods |
In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques, maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (eg cutting of high grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material and should be stated. Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high grade results and longer lengths of low grade results, the procedure used for such aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of such aggregations should be shown in detail. The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values should be clearly stated. |
Details are presented in the report.
|
Relationship between mineralisation widths and intercept lengths |
These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of Exploration Results. If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is known, its nature should be reported. If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there should be a clear statement to this effect (eg ‘down hole length, true width not known’). |
Lake Irwin The unit is flat lying and trenches and pits are vertical hence the intersected downhole depth is equivalent to the inferred thickness of mineralisation.
|
Diagrams |
Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of intercepts should be included for any significant discovery being reported These should include, but not be limited to a plan view of drill hole collar locations and appropriate sectional views. |
Addressed in the announcement. |
Balanced reporting |
Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not practicable, representative reporting of both low and high grades and/or widths should be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of Exploration Results. |
All results have been included. |
Other substantive exploration data |
Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be reported including (but not limited to): geological observations; geophysical survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples – size and method of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock characteristics; potential deleterious or contaminating substances. |
Gravity survey was completed by Atlas Geophysics using a Hi Target V100 GNSS receiver for accurate positioning and CG-5 Digital Automated Gravity Meter. Gravity data was gained using the contractors rapid acquisition, high accuracy UTV borne techniques. The company’s own in-house reduction and QA software was used to reduce the data on a daily basis to ensure quality and integrity. All gravity meters were calibrated pre and post survey and meter drift rates were monitored daily. 3 to 5 % of the stations are repeated for quality control. Western Geophysics were engaged to manage and process the gravity survey. Processing the survey involved reducing the gravity data and integrating to the regional data to a residual anomaly which shows there is a semi-continuous distinct residual gravity low of negative 2 to 2.5 milligals present along eastern to central areas to the entire tenement area. |
Further work |
The nature and scale of planned further work (eg tests for lateral extensions or depth extensions or large-scale step-out drilling). Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions, including the main geological interpretations and future drilling areas, provided this information is not commercially sensitive. |
Further trench testing and numerical hydrogeological modelling to be completed that incorporates the results of the test pumping. The model will be the basis of the annual brine abstraction rate and mine life.
|
Name of entity |
||
Salt Lake Potash Limited |
||
ABN |
Quarter ended (“current quarter”) |
|
98 117 085 748 |
31 March 2018 |
Consolidated statement of cash flows |
Current quarter $A’000 |
Year to date (9 months) |
||
1. |
Cash flows from operating activities |
|||
1.1 |
Receipts from customers |
|||
1.2 |
Payments for |
(1,193) |
(4,503) |
|
(a) exploration & evaluation |
||||
(b) development |
– |
– |
||
(c) production |
– |
– |
||
(d) staff costs |
(597) |
(1,958) |
||
(e) administration and corporate costs |
(238) |
(820) |
||
1.3 |
Dividends received (see note 3) |
– |
– |
|
1.4 |
Interest received |
61 |
194 |
|
1.5 |
Interest and other costs of finance paid |
– |
– |
|
1.6 |
Income taxes paid |
– |
– |
|
1.7 |
Research and development refunds |
– |
457 |
|
1.8 |
Other (provide details if material) – GST refunds (paid) – Exploration Incentive Scheme |
(264) 66 – |
(604) 104 30 |
|
1.9 |
Net cash from / (used in) operating activities |
(2,165) |
(7,100) |
|
2. |
Cash flows from investing activities |
(35) |
(122) |
|
2.1 |
Payments to acquire: |
|||
(a) property, plant and equipment |
||||
(b) tenements (see item 10) |
– |
– |
||
(c) investments |
– |
– |
||
(d) other non-current assets |
– |
– |
||
2.2 |
Proceeds from the disposal of: |
– |
– |
|
(a) property, plant and equipment |
||||
(b) tenements (see item 10) |
– |
– |
||
(c) investments |
– |
– |
||
(d) other non-current assets |
– |
– |
||
2.3 |
Cash flows from loans to other entities |
– |
– |
|
2.4 |
Dividends received (see note 3) |
– |
– |
|
2.5 |
Other (provide details if material) |
– |
– |
|
2.6 |
Net cash from / (used in) investing activities |
(35) |
(122) |
|
3. |
Cash flows from financing activities |
– |
– |
|
3.1 |
Proceeds from issues of shares |
|||
3.2 |
Proceeds from issue of convertible notes |
– |
– |
|
3.3 |
Proceeds from exercise of share options |
– |
– |
|
3.4 |
Transaction costs related to issues of shares, convertible notes or options |
– |
(75) |
|
3.5 |
Proceeds from borrowings |
– |
– |
|
3.6 |
Repayment of borrowings |
– |
– |
|
3.7 |
Transaction costs related to loans and borrowings |
– |
– |
|
3.8 |
Dividends paid |
– |
– |
|
3.9 |
Other (provide details if material) |
– |
– |
|
3.10 |
Net cash from / (used in) financing activities |
– |
(75) |
|
4. |
Net increase / (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents for the period |
10,500 |
15,597 |
|
4.1 |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|||
4.2 |
Net cash from / (used in) operating activities (item 1.9 above) |
(2,165) |
(7,100) |
|
4.3 |
Net cash from / (used in) investing activities (item 2.6 above) |
(35) |
(122) |
|
4.4 |
Net cash from / (used in) financing activities (item 3.10 above) |
– |
(75) |
|
4.5 |
Effect of movement in exchange rates on cash held |
– |
– |
|
4.6 |
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
8,300 |
8,300 |
|
5. |
Reconciliation of cash and cash equivalents |
Current quarter |
Previous quarter |
5.1 |
Bank balances |
2,300 |
2,500 |
5.2 |
Call deposits |
6,000 |
8,000 |
5.3 |
Bank overdrafts |
– |
– |
5.4 |
Other (provide details) |
– |
– |
5.5 |
Cash and cash equivalents at end of quarter (should equal item 4.6 above) |
8,300 |
10,500 |
6. |
Payments to directors of the entity and their associates |
Current quarter |
6.1 |
Aggregate amount of payments to these parties included in item 1.2 |
(140) |
6.2 |
Aggregate amount of cash flow from loans to these parties included in item 2.3 |
– |
6.3 |
Include below any explanation necessary to understand the transactions included in items 6.1 and 6.2 |
|
Payments include director and consulting fees, superannuation and provision of corporate, administration services, and a fully serviced office.
|
7. |
Payments to related entities of the entity and their associates |
Current quarter |
7.1 |
Aggregate amount of payments to these parties included in item 1.2 |
– |
7.2 |
Aggregate amount of cash flow from loans to these parties included in item 2.3 |
– |
7.3 |
Include below any explanation necessary to understand the transactions included in items 7.1 and 7.2 |
|
Not applicable.
|
8. |
Financing facilities available |
Total facility amount at quarter end |
Amount drawn at quarter end |
8.1 |
Loan facilities |
– |
– |
8.2 |
Credit standby arrangements |
– |
– |
8.3 |
Other (please specify) |
– |
– |
8.4 |
Include below a description of each facility above, including the lender, interest rate and whether it is secured or unsecured. If any additional facilities have been entered into or are proposed to be entered into after quarter end, include details of those facilities as well. |
||
Not applicable
|
9. |
Estimated cash outflows for next quarter |
$A’000 |
9.1 |
Exploration and evaluation |
1,500 |
9.2 |
Development |
– |
9.3 |
Production |
– |
9.4 |
Staff costs |
750 |
9.5 |
Administration and corporate costs |
200 |
9.6 |
Other (provide details if material) |
|
9.7 |
Total estimated cash outflows |
2,650 |
10. |
Changes in tenements |
Tenement reference and location |
Nature of interest |
Interest at beginning of quarter |
Interest at end of quarter |
10.1 |
Interests in mining tenements and petroleum tenements lapsed, relinquished or reduced |
Refer to Table 6 |
|||
10.2 |
Interests in mining tenements and petroleum tenements acquired or increased |
Compliance statement
1 This statement has been prepared in accordance with accounting standards and policies which comply with Listing Rule 19.11A.
2 This statement gives a true and fair view of the matters disclosed.
Sign here: …………………………………………………… Date: 30 April 2018
(Director/Company secretary)
Print name: Sam Cordin
Notes
1. The quarterly report provides a basis for informing the market how the entity’s activities have been financed for the past quarter and the effect on its cash position. An entity that wishes to disclose additional information is encouraged to do so, in a note or notes included in or attached to this report.
2. If this quarterly report has been prepared in accordance with Australian Accounting Standards, the definitions in, and provisions of, AASB 6: Exploration for and Evaluation of Mineral Resources and AASB 107: Statement of Cash Flows apply to this report. If this quarterly report has been prepared in accordance with other accounting standards agreed by ASX pursuant to Listing Rule 19.11A, the corresponding equivalent standards apply to this report.
3. Dividends received may be classified either as cash flows from operating activities or cash flows from investing activities, depending on the accounting policy of the entity.
For further information please visit www.saltlakepotash.com.au or contact:
Matt Syme/Sam Cordin |
Salt Lake Potash Limited |
Tel: +61 8 9322 6322 |
Jo Battershill |
Salt Lake Potash Limited |
Tel: +44 (0) 20 7478 3900 |
Colin Aaronson/Richard Tonthat |
Grant Thornton UK LLP (Nominated Adviser) |
Tel: +44 (0) 20 7383 5100 |
Derrick Lee/Beth McKiernan |
Cenkos Securities plc (Joint Broker) |
Tel: +44 (0) 131 220 6939 |
Jerry Keen/Toby Gibbs
|
Shore Capital (Joint broker) |
Tel: +44 (0) 20 7468 7967
|
Salt Lake Potash #SO4 – Initial Results Confirm Lake Way Potential
Salt Lake Potash Limited (SLP or the Company) is pleased to provide an update on the Company’s Lake Way project since following execution of an MOU with Blackham Resources Limited’s (Blackham) outlining the potential to incorporate Blackham’s Mining Lease tenure into the development of a Sulphate of Potash (SOP) operation.
Highlights of work completed include:
Surface Sampling Program
- A preliminary surface sampling program on Blackham’s tenements confirms the Lake’s average SOP grade of over 14kg/m3, making Lake Way one of Australia’s highest grade SOP brine sources.
Geotechnical Investigations
- An initial geological and geotechnical investigation by the Company and Knight Piesold confirmed the availability of in-situ clays amendable for on-lake evaporation pond construction. A total of 24 auger holes were excavated across Blackham’s tenements and laboratory tested.
Surface Aquifer Exploration
- Review and modelling of the large volume of historical exploration data for Lake Way confirms the likelihood of a large hypersaline brine pool on both Blackham and SLP’s tenements.
- The Company is in the process of mobilising a drill rig and an amphibious excavator on the Lake to complete an initial surface aquifer exploration program.
- The surface aquifer program will include the construction of test pits and trenches for long-term pump testing.
Process Testwork
- The Company has commenced a range of process development testwork including process pathway modelling by international experts, a bulk sample evaporation trial and site-based evaporation trial at Lake Way.
Salt Lake Potash #SO4 CEO Matt Syme said: “These initial results are very pleasing and support the Company’s view that Lake Way is an ideal site for our SOP Demonstration Plant and subsequent expansions. It appears to have the best combination in Australia of scale, brine chemistry, playa surface, shallow clays for pond construction, permitting pathway and infrastructure access, which should result in substantial time and cost advantages.”
LAKE WAY
Lake Way is located in the Goldfields region of Western Australia, less than 15km south of Wiluna. The surface area of the Lake is over 270km2.
The Wiluna region is an historic mining precinct dating back to the late 19th century. It has been a prolific nickel and gold mining region and therefore has well developed, high quality infrastructure in place.
The Goldfields Highway is a high quality sealed road permitted to carry quad road trains and passes 2km from the Lake. The Goldfields Gas Pipeline is adjacent to SLP’s tenements, running past the eastern side of the Lake.
SLP has entered an MOU with Blackham to investigate the development of an SOP operation on Blackham’s existing Mining Leases at Lake Way including, initially, a 40-50,000tpa Demonstration Plant (see announcement dated 12 March 2018).
Lake Way has some compelling advantages which make it potentially an ideal site for an SOP operation, including:
- Substantial likely capital and operating savings from sharing overheads and infrastructure with the Wiluna Gold Mine, including the accommodation camp, flights, power, maintenance, infrastructure and other costs.
- The site has an excellent freight solution, adjacent to the Goldfields Highway, which is permitted for heavy haulage 4 trailer road trains to the railhead at Leonora.
- A Demonstration Plant would likely be built on Blackham’s existing Mining Licences, already subject of a Native Title Agreement.
- SLP would dewater the existing Williamson Pit on Lake Way, prior to Blackham mining, planned for early 2019. The pit contains an estimated 1.2GL of brine at the exceptional grade of 25kg/m3 of SOP. This brine is potentially the ideal starter feed for evaporation ponds, having already evaporated from the normal Lake Way brine grade, which averages over 14kg/m3.
- The high grade brines at Lake Way will result in lower capital and operating costs due to lower extraction and evaporation requirements.
- There would be substantial savings to both parties from co-operating on exploration activities on each other’s ground.
- The presence of clays in the upper levels of the lake which should be amenable to low cost, on-lake evaporation pond construction.
SLP will complete a Scoping Study for a potential SOP operation at Lake Way, including a Demonstration Plant, by mid-2018, in time to allow a decision on dewatering the Williamson Pit under the MOU. There is substantial historical data available for Lake Way and, along with the extensive, high quality technical work undertaken at SLP’s other lakes, which has substantial application at Lake Way, a Scoping Study can be undertaken in a much shorter timeframe than would normally be the case.
Surface Sampling Program
The Company has now completed initial surface sampling program at Lake Way, substantially covering the Lake surface. A total of 23 pit samples have been collected encountering brine at a standing water level generally less than 1 metre from surface.
The average brine chemistry of the samples was:
The brine chemistry at Lake Way is very consistent over the lake surface. The SOP grade are amongst the highest achieved in Australia to date.
Geotechnical Investigations
To gain an understanding of ground conditions for trenching and pond construction, a preliminary geotechnical investigation program was undertaken within the Blackham Mining Tenements, in conjunction with leading international geotechnical consultants, Knight Piesold.
A total of 24 hand auger boreholes were drilled to depths of up to 3.2 metres, and the encountered soils were logged and sampled.
Lake Way ground conditions consists of a thin surface layer of evaporite sands, overlying sandy and silty clays. Firm clays were encountered at 1m to 2m depth, generally increasing in strength with depth, becoming hard from 2m to 3m. Shallow groundwater was encountered on average 0.2m below the lake surface.
A testing program was undertaken at a NATA accredited geotechnical laboratory, using specific test methods appropriate for saline conditions, to characterise soils and assess preliminary soil parameters.
Summary test results are presented below.
Erodibility characteristics were tested and an Emerson class number of 6 was measured for all samples. This indicates non-dispersive soils that are not prone to erosion when used to form embankments.
Based on the preliminary geotechnical work to date, Knight Piesold have concluded that:
- The in-situ clay materials can be expected to provide natural low permeability layers to control seepage of on-lake ponds.
- The clays are suitable for embankment construction purposes, with adequate moisture control and borrow pit dewatering.
- A key advantage of Lake Way is the presence of a drier clay zone surrounding the Williamson Pit, which has the potential to provide borrow materials and construction schedule benefits for the upcoming pond construction programs.
Knight Piesold is now preparing an options study to evaluate design concepts for large-scale pond systems and provide earthworks quantities and costs. Seepage assessments and flood studies are underway. In parallel, design work is being undertaken for a dewatering pond to hold the Williamson Pit brine.
Surface Aquifer Characterisation
Lake Way and its surrounds have been the subject of a substantial amount of historical exploration for gold, nickel, uranium and other minerals, as well as for process water for mining operations. A total of over 2,800 holes have been drilled in and around the Lake previously, providing a very large database of geotechnical information.
SLP have commenced compiling, digitising and interpreting the historical exploration database to extract relevant data and provide initial basement geometry for the Lake area, to assist estimation of an initial JORC compliant resource.
The Company is also in the process of mobilising a small track-mounted drill rig and an amphibious excavator to complete an initial surface aquifer exploration program. This work will provide critical data for the hydrogeological model for the surface aquifer of the Lake, as well as geological and geotechnical information for infrastructure design and construction.
The surface aquifer program will include the construction of test pits and trenches for long-term pump testing.
The drill campaign is also intended to sterilise (for gold exploration) sufficient areas for siting brine extraction trenches and evaporation ponds.
Process Testwork
The Company has commenced a range of process development testwork to provide and validate inputs to the Lake Way Scoping Study production model. Naturally, this includes testing brines from the Lake itself, as well as the super-concentrated brines from the Williamson Pit.
The testwork aims to confirm the modelled brine evaporation pathways firstly under laboratory simulated conditions and then from a site-based trial of sufficient scale to test on-lake evaporation conditions.
Initial brine evaporation modelling, conducted by internationally renowned solar pond experts, Ad Infinitum, indicates the salts produced at Lake Way will be comparable to those produced at Lake Wells and therefore suitable for conversion into SOP.
International laboratory and testing company, Bureau Veritas (BV), has commenced a series of laboratory-scale brine evaporation trials at their Perth facility, under simulated average Lake Way climate conditions. The aim of the BV trials is to monitor the chemical composition of the brine and salts produced through the evaporation process to confirm:
- Concentration thresholds in the brine chemistry which can be used to maximise the recovery of potassium in the harvest salts and minimise the quantity of dilutive salts fed to a process plant;
- The quantity and composition of harvest salts which will for the plant feed in commercial production; and
- The potential for any internal evaporation pond recycle streams that may improve harvest salt recovery.
Two tests – one for Williamson Pit brine and one for normal Lake Way brine – are currently underway, each evaporating 150kg of brine on a load cell to monitor evaporative loss. The temperature of the brine and air flow across the brine surface is controlled by using infra-red lamps and fans to simulate Lake Way average weather conditions.
A Site Evaporation Trial (SET), as successfully operated at Lake Wells previously, is under construction at Lake Way and will be filled with first brine over the next week. The SET will gather specific evaporation data on concentrated brines under actual conditions, providing refinements to the commercial scale pond modelling.
The Site Evaporation Trial is also designed to produce sufficient harvest salt for confirmatory process testwork and initial customer samples.
Competent Persons Statement
The information in this report that relates to Exploration Results, or Mineral Resources for Lake Way is based on information compiled by Mr Ben Jeuken, who is a member Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. Mr Jeuken is employed by Groundwater Science Pty Ltd, an independent consulting company. Mr Jeuken has sufficient experience, which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity, which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Mr Jeuken consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.
Forward Looking Statements
This announcement may include forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based on Salt Lake Potash Limited’s expectations and beliefs concerning future events. Forward looking statements are necessarily subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are outside the control of Salt Lake Potash Limited, which could cause actual results to differ materially from such statements. Salt Lake Potash Limited makes no undertaking to subsequently update or revise the forward-looking statements made in this announcement, to reflect the circumstances or events after the date of that announcement.
APPENDIX 1 – BRINE CHEMISTRY ANALYSIS
APPENDIX 2 – JORC TABLE ONE
Section 1: Sampling Techniques and Data
For further information please visit www.saltlakepotash.com.au or contact:
Matt Syme/Sam Cordin |
Salt Lake Potash Limited | Tel: +61 8 9322 6322 |
Jo Battershill |
Salt Lake Potash Limited |
Tel: +44 (0) 20 7478 3900 |
Colin Aaronson/Richard Tonthat |
Grant Thornton UK LLP (Nominated Adviser) |
Tel: +44 (0) 20 7383 5100 |
Derrick Lee/Beth McKiernan |
Cenkos Securities plc (Joint Broker) |
Tel: +44 (0) 131 220 6939 |
Jerry Keen/Toby Gibbs
|
Shore Capital (Joint broker) |
Tel: +44 (0) 20 7468 7967 |
The information contained within this announcement is deemed to constitute inside information as stipulated under the Market Abuse Regulations (EU) No. 596/2014. Upon the publication of this announcement, this inside information is now considered to be in the public domain.
Salt Lake Potash #SO4 – MOU With Blackham Resources For Potential Development Of Lake Way
Salt Lake Potash (SLP) is pleased to announce that the Company has entered a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with Blackham Resources Limited (Blackham) to investigate the potential development of a Sulphate of Potash (SOP) operation based at Lake Way, near Wiluna.
SLP holds approximately 290km2 of tenure over the Lake Way Paleochannel, as part of the Goldfields Salt Lakes Project (GSLP). Blackham is the owner of the Matilda-Wiluna Gold Operation and holds approximately 64km2 at the Northern End of the Lake. This surrounds the former Williamson Pit, last mined in 2006 and now filled with brine at an exceptional grade of 25kg/m3 of SOP.
Under the MOU, SLP will acquire Blackham’s brine rights and Blackham will acquire gold rights to SLP’s Lake Way holdings, with each company retaining a royalty on their respective holdings. The parties will also co-operate to exchange data and facilitate activities on each other properties.
SLP will investigate the development of an SOP operation at Lake Way, including initially a 40-50,000tpa Demonstration Plant. SLP will sole fund the evaluation and development of any SOP operation at Lake Way. Lake Way has some compelling advantages which make it potentially an ideal site for an SOP operation, including:
- Substantial capital and operating savings from sharing overheads and infrastructure with the Wiluna Gold Mine, benefits which both Companies would capture. This includes potentially the accommodation camp, flights, power, maintenance, infrastructure and other costs.
- The site has an excellent freight solution, located 2km from Goldfields Highway, which is permitted for heavy haulage 4 trailer road trains to the railhead at Leonora. It is also adjacent to the Goldfields Gas Pipeline.
- A Demonstration Plant would likely be built on Blackham’s existing Mining Licences, already subject of a Native Title Agreement.
- SLP would dewater the existing Williamson Pit, prior to Blackham mining, planned for early 2019. The pit contains an estimated 1.2GL of brine at the exceptional grade of 25kg/m3 of SOP (Refer Appendix 1 for Williamson Pit brine samples details). This brine is potentially the ideal starter feed for evaporation ponds, having already evaporated from the normal Lake Way brine grade, which averages around 14kg/m3.
- The high grade brines at Lake Way will result in lower capital and operating costs due to lower extraction and evaporation requirements.
- There would be substantial savings to both parties from co-operating on activities on each other’s ground.
- Historical exploration and initial sampling indicate the presence of clays in the upper levels of the lake which should be amenable to low cost, on-lake evaporation pond construction.
SLP will complete a Scoping Study for a potential SOP operation at Lake Way, including a Demonstration Plant, by mid-2018, in time to allow a decision on dewatering the Williamson Pit. There is substantial historical data available for Lake Way and the companies have already undertaken preliminary sampling in the Blackham area. Along with the extensive, high quality technical work undertaken at SLP’s other lakes, which has substantial application at Lake Way, a Scoping Study can be reliably undertaken in a much shorter timeframe than would normally be the case.
SLP CEO Matt Syme said “We are pleased to reach this agreement with Blackham which could potentially bring very substantial benefit to both companies, and adds significant value from mineral rights to which neither company ascribed value as a standalone. Lake Way appears to be an ideal site for our SOP Demonstration Plant and subsequent expansions. We expect it would result in material time and cost savings for us and also bring significant benefits to the Wiluna Community. It appears to have the best combination in Australia of scale, brine chemistry, permitting and infrastructure access and justifies the effort to prove its potential. Work will continue in parallel at Lake Wells, where our Mining Lease Application is in progress.”
LAKE WAY
Lake Way is located in the Goldfields region of Western Australia, less than 15km south of Wiluna. The surface area of the Lake is over 200km2.
Lake Way was identified due to its strategic location and significant infrastructure advantages. The Wiluna region is an historic mining precinct dating back to the late 19th century. It has been a prolific nickel and gold mining region and therefore has well developed, high quality infrastructure in place.
The Goldfields Highway is a high quality sealed road permitted to carry quad road trains and passes 2km from the Lake. The Goldfields Gas Pipeline is adjacent to SLP’s tenements, running past the eastern side of the Lake.
As described in SLP’s ASX Announcement dated 12 December 2017, Lake Way has been extensively explored and mined previously. A paleochannel has been well defined along the Eastern edge of the lake, including brine sampling at depth and test pumping of the basal aquifer.
Competent Persons Statement
The information in this report that relates to Exploration Results for Lake Way is based on information compiled by Mr Ben Jeuken, who is a member Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. Mr Jeuken is employed by Groundwater Science Pty Ltd, an independent consulting company. Mr Jeuken has sufficient experience, which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity, which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Mr Jeuken consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.
Forward Looking Statements
This announcement may include forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based on Salt Lake’s expectations and beliefs concerning future events. Forward looking statements are necessarily subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are outside the control of Salt Lake, which could cause actual results to differ materially from such statements. Salt Lake makes no undertaking to subsequently update or revise the forward-looking statements made in this announcement, to reflect the circumstances or events after the date of that announcement.
APPENDIX 1 – BRINE CHEMISTRY ANALYSIS
PIT SAMPLE |
East |
North |
Depth (m) |
K (mg/L) |
Cl (mg/L) |
Na (mg/L) |
Ca (mg/L) |
Mg (mg/L) |
SO4 (mg/L) |
TDS (g/L) |
Y800006 |
233338 |
7035669 |
1 |
11,400 |
180,250 |
106,000 |
173 |
14,400 |
47,700 |
371 |
Y800008 |
233338 |
7035669 |
20 |
11,400 |
181,300 |
106,000 |
175 |
14,400 |
48,000 |
371 |
Y800010 |
233338 |
7035669 |
35 |
11,300 |
180,800 |
107,000 |
174 |
14,700 |
48,300 |
373 |
Y800012 |
233334 |
7035874 |
1 |
11,100 |
179,050 |
106,000 |
171 |
14,200 |
47,100 |
368 |
Y800014 |
233334 |
7035874 |
20 |
11,400 |
171,150 |
107,000 |
180 |
14,400 |
47,100 |
378 |
Y800016 |
233334 |
7035874 |
35 |
11,500 |
182,000 |
111,000 |
179 |
14,700 |
49,200 |
373 |
Y800018 |
233335 |
7036022 |
1 |
11,300 |
179,400 |
106,000 |
177 |
14,300 |
47,400 |
367 |
Y800020 |
233335 |
7036022 |
20 |
11,400 |
181,150 |
107,000 |
177 |
14,500 |
48,300 |
375 |
Y800022 |
233335 |
7036022 |
35 |
11,400 |
181,150 |
107,000 |
179 |
14,800 |
48,900 |
376 |
APPENDIX 2 – JORC TABLE ONE
Section 1: Sampling Techniques and Data
Criteria |
JORC Code explanation |
Commentary |
Sampling techniques |
Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels, random chips, or specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling. Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used. Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public Report. In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has been done this would be relatively simple (eg ‘reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay’). In other cases more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (eg submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information. |
Brine samples were collected from Williamson Pit at various depths. |
Drilling techniques |
Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (eg core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc). |
Not applicable
|
Drill sample recovery |
Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries and results assessed. Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure representative nature of the samples. Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material. |
Not applicable
|
Logging |
Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies. Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc) photography. The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged. |
Not applicable
|
Sub-sampling techniques and sample preparation |
If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core taken. If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc and whether sampled wet or dry. For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample preparation technique. Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages to maximise representivity of samples. Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in situ material collected, including for instance results for field duplicate/second-half sampling. Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being sampled. |
Sample bottles are rinsed with brine which is discarded prior to sampling. All brine samples taken in the field are split into two sub-samples: primary and duplicate. Reference samples were analysed at a separate laboratory for QA/QC.
|
Quality of assay data and laboratory tests |
The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or total. For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc, the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc. Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (ie lack of bias) and precision have been established. |
Primary samples were sent to Bureau Veritas Minerals Laboratory, Perth. Brine samples were analysed using ICP-AES for K, Na, Mg, Ca, with chloride determined by Mohr titration and alkalinity determined volumetrically. Sulphate was calculated from the ICP-AES sulphur analysis.
|
Verification of sampling and assaying |
The verification of significant intersections by either independent or alternative company personnel. The use of twinned holes. Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols. Discuss any adjustment to assay data. |
Data entry is done in the field to minimise transposition errors. Brine assay results are received from the laboratory in digital format, these data sets are subject to the quality control described above. All laboratory results are entered in to the company’s database and validation completed. Independent verification of significant intercepts was not considered warranted given the relatively consistent nature of the brine. |
Location of data points |
Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource estimation. Specification of the grid system used. Quality and adequacy of topographic control. |
Sample co-ordinates were captured using hand held GPS. Coordinates were provided in GDA 94_MGA Zone 51. product.
|
Data spacing and distribution |
Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results. Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied. Whether sample compositing has been applied. |
Data spacing reported in Appendix 1
|
Orientation of data in relation to geological structure |
Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of possible structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the deposit type. If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material. |
Not Applicable
|
Sample security |
The measures taken to ensure sample security. |
All brine samples were marked and kept onsite before transport to the laboratory. All remaining sample and duplicates are stored in the Perth office in climate-controlled conditions. Chain of Custody system is maintained. |
Audits or reviews |
The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data. |
Data review is summarised in Quality of assay data, laboratory tests and Verification of sampling and assaying. No audits were undertaken. |
Section 2: Reporting of Exploration Results
Criteria |
JORC Code explanation |
Commentary |
Mineral tenement and land tenure status |
Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmental settings. The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area.
|
Pit samples were taken from M53/253 owned by Blackham Resources Limited (held by Nova Energy Ltd) under the permission of Blackham Resources Limited. |
Exploration done by other parties |
Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties. |
Addressed in the announcement dated 12 December 2017. |
Geology |
Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation. |
Salt Lake Brine Deposit |
Drill hole Information |
A summary of all information material to the understanding of the exploration results including a tabulation of the following information for all Material drill holes: o easting and northing of the drill hole collar o elevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevation above sea level in metres) of the drill hole collar o dip and azimuth of the hole o down hole length and interception depth o hole length. If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that the information is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from the understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly explain why this is the case. |
Not Applicable
|
Data aggregation methods |
In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques, maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (eg cutting of high grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material and should be stated. Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high grade results and longer lengths of low grade results, the procedure used for such aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of such aggregations should be shown in detail. The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values should be clearly stated. |
No low grade cut-off or high grade capping has been implemented.
|
Relationship between mineralisation widths and intercept lengths |
These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of Exploration Results. If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is known, its nature should be reported. If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there should be a clear statement to this effect (eg ‘down hole length, true width not known’). |
Not applicable |
Diagrams |
Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of intercepts should be included for any significant discovery being reported These should include, but not be limited to a plan view of drill hole collar locations and appropriate sectional views. |
Not Applicable |
Balanced reporting |
Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not practicable, representative reporting of both low and high grades and/or widths should be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of Exploration Results. |
All results have been included. |
Other substantive exploration data |
Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be reported including (but not limited to): geological observations; geophysical survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples – size and method of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock characteristics; potential deleterious or contaminating substances. |
Addressed in the announcement.
|
Further work |
The nature and scale of planned further work (eg tests for lateral extensions or depth extensions or large-scale step-out drilling). Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions, including the main geological interpretations and future drilling areas, provided this information is not commercially sensitive. |
Addressed in the announcement.
|
For further information please visit www.saltlakepotash.com.au or contact:
Matt Syme/Sam Cordin |
Salt Lake Potash Limited |
Tel: +61 8 9322 6322 |
Jo Battershill |
Salt Lake Potash Limited |
Tel: +44 (0) 20 7478 3900 |
Colin Aaronson/Richard Tonthat |
Grant Thornton UK LLP (Nominated Adviser) |
Tel: +44 (0) 20 7383 5100 |
Derrick Lee/Beth McKiernan |
Cenkos Securities plc (Joint Broker) |
Tel: +44 (0) 131 220 6939 |
Jerry Keen/Toby Gibbs
|
Shore Capital (Joint broker) |
Tel: +44 (0) 20 7468 7967
|
The information contained within this announcement is deemed to constitute inside information as stipulated under the Market Abuse Regulations (EU) No. 596/2014. Upon the publication of this announcement, this inside information is now considered to be in the public domain.