Home » Posts tagged 'Batteries'

Tag Archives: Batteries

#SVML Sovereign Metals LTD – Kasiya’s Graphite Suitable for Refractory Use

KASIYA’S GRAPHITE SUITABLE FOR REFRACTORY USE

·         

Kasiya graphite concentrate confirmed to meet or exceed all critical characteristics required for refractory applications

·         

Refractories market is the second largest end-user of natural graphite (24%) after batteries sector (52%)

·         

Refractories use coarser (larger) flake graphite products, which typically attract a premium over smaller flake-size products used in the batteries sector

·         

In Q4 2024, graphite usable in refractories achieved prices up to US$1,193/t versus smaller flake graphite used in the batteries sector, which sold for US$564/t

·         

Kasiya’s incremental cost of graphite production per the recently announced Optimised Prefeasibility results is US$241/t (FOB)

·         

Leading German laboratories ProGraphite and Dorfner Anzaplan completed a comprehensive testwork program of Kasiya’s graphite concentrate

·         

Results will be used for customer engagement and potential offtake discussions

·         

Previous testwork has already confirmed that Kasiya’s graphite can produce outstanding battery anode material

 

Sovereign Metals Limited (ASX:SVM; AIM:SVML; OTCQX: SVMLF) (Sovereign or the Company) is pleased to announce that testwork completed on graphite from the Company’s Kasiya Rutile-Graphite Project (Kasiya or the Project) has confirmed Kasiya’s graphite has the key characteristics required for use in refractory applications. The comprehensive testwork programs were completed by ProGraphite GmbH (ProGraphite) and Dorfner Anzaplan (DA) in Germany and demonstrated that Kasiya graphite concentrate contains very low sulphur levels and the absence of other impurities of concern, providing a competitive advantage over other current and potential sources of graphite supply.

Managing Director and CEO Frank Eagar commented: “The refractories market is the second largest end-user of natural graphite and requires larger, coarser graphite flakes with specific chemical and physical properties. We know that almost 70% of Kasiya’s graphite meets the size requirements for refractory applications. Today’s results confirm that our graphite product also meets or exceeds the key chemical and physical properties required to sell into the refractory market.

Combining these results with the excellent results for anode materials testing highlights the premium quality of Kasiya graphite concentrate and provides a very strong foundation for sales and marketing discussions.”

Kasiya Graphite Testwork Update

Sovereign has now completed testwork programs to confirm the suitability of graphite from Kasiya as a product for the two largest end-use markets for natural flake graphite i.e. refractory applications and anode material for use in lithium-ion batteries. Together, these two sectors account for over three-quarters of global natural graphite demand (see Figure 1).

Graphite products for refractory applications typically require larger flake sizes than the smaller graphite flake products used to produce battery anode materials. Larger flake size graphite products tend to attract significantly higher prices than smaller flake products.

In Q4 2024, Syrah Resources Limited (the world’s largest, publicly listed natural graphite producer outside of China) reported a price for smaller flake graphite concentrate to be used for battery anode production of US$564 per tonne (CIF) based on third-party sales. In December 2024, large flake graphite used in the refractory sector achieved prices of up to US$1,193/t (based on data from Benchmark Mineral Intelligence).

The incremental cost of producing a tonne of graphite from Kasiya under Sovereign’s recently announced Optimised Prefeasibility Study is US$241/t (see ASX announcement “Kasiya – Optimised PFS Results” dated 22 January 2025).

 

 

Figure 1: Uses of Graphite (Source: European Advanced Carbon and Graphite Association)

Refractory Application Testwork Results Summary

Flake graphite concentrate generated from Kasiya samples were tested for traditional, refractory applications at two leading European laboratories ProGraphite and DA, with the following findings:

Table 1: Graphite Requirements for Refractory Applications

Kasiya Graphite

High purity graphite concentrate with little impurities

Checkbox Checked with solid fill

High grade, large flakes within graphite concentrate

Checkbox Checked with solid fill

High melting temperature for flake ash residue after combusting graphite

Checkbox Checked with solid fill

High oxidation resistance of graphite concentrate

Checkbox Checked with solid fill

Low levels of volatiles in concentrate

Checkbox Checked with solid fill

Low levels of problematic mineral impurities, including sulphur

Checkbox Checked with solid fill

Low levels of “springback” from compression

Checkbox Checked with solid fill

 

Customer Engagement and Offtakes

The global refractory market is an estimated €20 Billion worldwide industry and is the largest traditional market for natural flake graphite. Natural flake graphite is added to refractories to improve performance.

Refractories are used to line furnaces and vessels to support high-temperature processing across a wide range of industries, including iron and steel production, non-ferrous metals, cement and lime, glass, and chemicals.

According to the global leader in refractories, RHI Magnesita NV, steel production is the major consumer of refractories, accounting for 60% of global demand. Each tonne of steel requires approximately 10-15kg of refractories.

Other key companies in the refractories market include Vesuvius plc, Krosakai Harima Corporation, Puyang Refractories Group, Chosun Refractories Co, Imerys SA, Shinagwa Refractories, Saint-Gobain, Morgans Advanced Materials and Calderys. 

The successful assessment of Kasiya coarse flake for refractory applications will be used for customer engagement and offtake discussions.

Enquires

 

Frank Eagar, Managing Director & CEO

South Africa / Malawi

+ 27 21 140 3190

 

Sapan Ghai, CCO

London

+44 207 478 3900

 

Nominated Adviser on AIM and Joint Broker

 

SP Angel Corporate Finance LLP

+44 20 3470 0470

Ewan Leggat

Charlie Bouverat

 

 

Joint Brokers

 

Stifel

+44 20 7710 7600

Varun Talwar

 

Ashton Clanfield

 

 

 

Berenberg

+44 20 3207 7800

Matthew Armitt

 

Jennifer Lee

 

 

 

Buchanan

+ 44 20 7466 5000

 

Competent Person Statement

The information in this report that relates to Metallurgical Testwork is based on information compiled by Dr Surinder Ghag, PhD., B. Eng, MBA, M.Sc., who is a Member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (MAusIMM). Dr Ghag is engaged as a consultant by Sovereign Metals Limited. Dr Ghag has sufficient experience, which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking, to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Dr Ghag consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.

The information in this report that relates to Exploration Results is based on information compiled by Mr Malcolm Titley, a Competent Person who is a member of The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (AusIMM). Mr Titley consults to Sovereign Metals Limited and is a holder of ordinary shares and unlisted performance rights in Sovereign Metals Limited. Mr Titley has sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity being undertaken, to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Mr Titley consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.

The information in this announcement that relates to operating costs is extracted from an announcement dated 22 January 2025, which is available to view at www.sovereignmetals.com.au. Sovereign confirms that: a) it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in the original announcement; b) all material assumptions and technical parameters underpinning the Production Target, and related forecast financial information derived from the Production Target included in the original announcement continue to apply and have not materially changed; and c) the form and context in which the relevant Competent Persons’ findings are presented in this presentation have not been materially modified from the original announcement.

Forward Looking Statement

This release may include forward-looking statements, which may be identified by words such as “expects”, “anticipates”, “believes”, “projects”, “plans”, and similar expressions. These forward-looking statements are based on Sovereign’s expectations and beliefs concerning future events. Forward looking statements are necessarily subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are outside the control of Sovereign, which could cause actual results to differ materially from such statements. There can be no assurance that forward-looking statements will prove to be correct. Sovereign makes no undertaking to subsequently update or revise the forward-looking statements made in this release, to reflect the circumstances or events after the date of that release.

The information contained within this announcement is deemed by the Company to constitute inside information as stipulated under the Market Abuse Regulations (EU) No. 596/2014 as it forms part of UK domestic law by virtue of the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 (‘MAR’). Upon the publication of this announcement via Regulatory Information Service (‘RIS’), this inside information is now considered to be in the public domain.

 

Appendix 1: Detailed Refractory Application Testwork Results

High purity graphite concentrate with little impurities

Kasiya concentrate was determined to have high purity (98%) with no observable natural mineral impurities observed (see Figure 2). Talc, which is not an impurity of concern for refractory applications, was determined to be the minor impurity on analysis of the ash remaining from combusting the graphite.

A close-up of a microscope Description automatically generated

Figure 2: Kasiya Flake Graphite SEM highlighting clean flakes

High grade, large flakes within graphite concentrate

Natural flake graphite for refractory applications requires high oxidation resistance. Particle size and grade are the two key determinants of oxidation resistance.

There are three different size fractions applicable to refractory graphite products: +300 microns, +180 microns and +150 microns. All three size fractions for Kasiya graphite concentrate demonstrate very high grade, highlighting coarse Kasiya flakes suitability for refractory applications.

Table 2: Size fraction analysis for Loss-on-Ignition (LOI) and Fixed Carbon Grade

Sample

LOI

(%)

Fixed Carbon (%)

+300 microns

98.69

98.50

+180 microns

98.83

98.57

+150 microns

98.75

98.49

 

High melting temperature for flake ash residue

Flake ash is the residue from combusting (burning) graphite. A high flake ash melting temperature is required for refractory applications.

Flake ash from coarse Kasiya flake (>180 microns) has a melting temperature of 1,373°C, above that for flake ash of commercial reference material (>1250°C), and hemisphere temperature of 1,393°C and flow temperature of 1,429°C (Figure 3) i.e. flake ash from coarse Kasiya concentrate exceeds the melting characteristics specification.

A collage of images of a person's body Description automatically generated

Figure 3: Flake ash from Kasiya coarse flake melting testing

High oxidation resistance of graphite concentrate

As reported in the Company’s ASX Announcement dated 21 November 2024, entitled “Positive Initial Test Results For Use Of Kasiya Graphite In Refractories”, and as expected from the high purity of Kasiya coarse fractions (Table 2), Kasiya’s coarse flake has excellent resistance to oxidation. ProGraphite had confirmed Kasiya coarse flake exhibits:

No oxidation below 400°C, only a 6.4% mass loss after four hours at 650°C, and a very low oxidation rate of 1.6% per hour at 650°C.

Comparative testing at DA showed that only a coarse commercial reference material (>300 microns) had a greater resistance than Kasiya coarse flake (>180 microns).

Low levels of volatiles in concentrate

DA measured volatiles content at 0.2%, which is comparable or better than commercial reference materials; ProGraphite measured volatile content at 0.19%-0.26% for various size fractions, significantly lower than what is considered “high volatiles content” at ~0.5% or higher.

High volatiles content can damage the refractory, indicating that Kasiya coarse flake meets this specification.

Low levels of problematic mineral impurities

Sulphur content was measured at 0.03% at DA, noting that Kasiya graphite sulphur levels are low compared to commercial reference material from other sources.

Calcium carbonates (calcite, dolomite) act as a flux, lowering the melting point of other minerals and releasing CO2 when exposed to high temperatures. Consequently, low levels are required in graphite used for refractory applications.  Calcium carbonates were not detected in testing of Kasiya concentrate via a range of methods. Other alkalis (sodium, potassium) which can also be reactive in refractory applications were also at low levels.

Low levels of “springback” from compression

Springback is an assessment of the extent of graphite to increase its volume after compression. A low springback is preferred for shape retention e.g. in producing refractory bricks.

Springback of Kasiya graphite was observed to be low and in line with results from Chinese graphite’s, decreasing with particle size (see Table 3).

Table 3: Springback Analysis of Kasiya Coarse Fractions

Sample

Springback (%)

+300 microns

8.1%

+180 microns

9.2%

+150 microns

11.5%

Conclusion

Testing of the broad range of criteria on the suitability of natural graphite concentrates for refractory applications confirmed that coarse Kasiya concentrate has the characteristics required for refractory applications – it has high purity, high oxidation resistance, high ash melting temperatures, low levels of volatiles, sulphur and calcium carbonates, and low springback.

 

Appendix 2: JORC CODE, 2012 EDITION – TABLE 1

SECTION 1 – SAMPLING TECHNIQUES AND DATA

 

Criteria

 JORC Code explanation

Commentary

Sampling Techniques

Nature and quality of sampling (e.g. cut channels, random chips, or specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling.

 

Metallurgical Composite Sample:

The sample was a composite of 24 Hand Auger (HA) and Push Tube (PT) holes drilled in 2021 and 2022 in the Kingfisher pit.

All drilling samples within the pit shell were added to the composite resulting in a sample of 2,498kg.

Specifically, the composite sample consisted of selected rutile mineralised zones from holes, NSHA0009, 0010, 0056, 0060, 0061, 0074, 0119, 0311, 0343, 0344, 0345, 0350 and NSPT 0011, 0013, 0014, 0015, 0017, 0020, 0021, 0023, 0024, 0025, 0026, 0027.

The following workflow was used to generate a pre-concentrate graphite feed at AML:

·       Wet screen at 2mm to remove oversize

·       Two stage cyclone separation at a cut size of 45µm to remove -45µm material

·       Pass +45µm -2mm (sand) fraction through Up Current Classifier (UCC)

·       Pass UCC O/F through cyclone at cut point of 45µm

·       Pass UCC O/F cyclone U/F (fine) over MG12 Mineral Technologies Spiral

·       Pass UCC U/F (coarse) over MG12 Mineral Technologies Spiral

·       Spiral cons are combined for further processing.

Fine and coarse gravity tailing samples contain approximately 75%-80% of the graphite present in the feed sample. The majority of the graphite lost is contained in the -45µm fines.

Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used.

 

Placer Consulting (Placer) Resource Geologists have reviewed Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) for the collection of HA and PT drill samples and found them to be fit for purpose.

Drilling and sampling activities are supervised by a suitably qualified Company geologist who is present at all times. All bulk 1-metre drill samples are geologically logged by the geologist at the drill site.

The primary metallurgical composite sample is considered representative for this style of mineralisation.

Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public Report. In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has been done this would be relatively simple (e.g. ‘reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay’). In other cases more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (e.g. submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information.

 

 

HA drilling was used to obtain 1-metre samples. The bulk metallurgical sample was a composite of selected samples from routine resource drilling.

Existing rutile and graphite exploration results were used to determine the 1-metre intervals suitable to contribute to the two bulk sample composites.

Drilling Techniques

Drill type (e.g. core, reverse circulation, openhole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (e.g. core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, facesampling bit or other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc).

 

Hand-auger drilling is completed with 75mm diameter enclosed spiral bits with 1-metrelong steel rods.  Each 1m of drill sample is collected into separate sample bags and set aside.  The auger bits and flights are cleaned between each metre of sampling to avoid contamination.  

Placer has reviewed SOPs for hand-auger drilling and found them to be fit for purpose and support the resource classifications as applied to the MRE.

Drill Sample Recovery

Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries and results assessed.

 

The configuration of drilling and nature of materials encountered results in negligible sample loss or contamination. 

Samples are assessed visually for recoveries. Overall, recovery is good. Drilling is ceased when recoveries become poor generally once the water table has been encountered.

Auger drilling samples are actively assessed by the geologist onsite for recoveries and contamination.

Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure representative nature of the samples.

 

The Company’s trained geologists supervise auger drilling on a 1 team 1 geologist basis and are responsible for monitoring all aspects of the drilling and sampling process.

 

 

Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material.

 

No bias related to preferential loss or gain of different materials has occurred.

Logging

Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation mining studies and metallurgical studies.

 

All individual 1-metre auger intervals are geologically logged, recording relevant

data to a set template using company codes.

 

Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc.) photography.

 

All logging includes lithological features and estimates of basic mineralogy. Logging is generally qualitative.

The total length and percentage of the relevant intersection logged

 

100% of samples are geologically logged.

Sub-sampling techniques and sample preparation

If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core taken.

 

Not applicable – no core drilling conducted.

 

 

 

If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc. and whether sampled wet or dry.

Primary individual 1-metre samples from all HA and PT holes drilled are sun dried, homogenised and riffle split.

 

 

For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample preparation technique.

 

Metallurgical Composite Sample:

1-metre intervals selected for the 2,498kg metallurgical sample were divided into weathering units.

MOTT and PSAP material were combined and homogenised in preparation for dispatch to Australian laboratory Intertek for TGC assay.

Per Australian import quarantine requirements the contributing SOIL/FERP material from within 2m of surface was kept separate to undergo quarantine heat treatment at Intertek Laboratory on arrival into Australia.   

The two sub samples (SOIL/FERP and MOTT/PSAP) were then dispatched from Intertek to AML Laboratory (AML). AML sub-sampled and assayed the individual lithologies prior to combining and homogenising the sample in preparation for test-work.

Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages to maximise representivity of samples.

 

The sample preparation techniques and QA/QC protocols are considered appropriate for the nature of this test-work.

 

Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in situ material collected, including for instance results for field duplicate/second-half sampling.

 

The sampling best represents the material in situ.

Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being sampled.

 

The sample size is considered appropriate for the nature of the test-work.

Quality of assay data and laboratory tests

The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or total.

Metallurgical Composite Sample:

The following workflow was used to generate a graphite product;

o    Coarse and fine rougher graphite flotation

o    Polishing grind of coarse and fine rougher graphite concentrate

o    Cleaner flotation of coarse and fine graphite

o    Cleaner concentrate sizing at 180µm

o    Regrind of separate +180µm/-180µm fractions

o    Three stage recleaner flotation of +180µm/-180µm fractions

 

For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc., the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc.

 

Acceptable levels of accuracy and precision have been established. No handheld methods are used for quantitative determination.

 

 

 

 

Nature of quality control procedures adopted (e.g. standards, blanks, duplicate, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (i.e. lack of bias) and precision have been established.

 

Acceptable levels of accuracy and precision have been established in the preparation of the bulk sample composites.

Verification of sampling & assaying

The verification of significant intersections by either independent or alternative company personnel.

 

No drilling intersections are being reported.

The use of twinned holes.

 

No twin holes completed in this program.

 

Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols.

All data was collected initially on paper logging sheets and codified to the Company’s templates. This data was hand entered to spreadsheets and validated by Company geologists.

 

 

Discuss any adjustment to assay data.

 

No adjustment to assay data has been made.

 

Location of data points

Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource estimation.

 

A Trimble R2 Differential GPS is used to pick up the collars. Daily capture at a registered reference marker ensures equipment remains in calibration.

No downhole surveying is completed. Given the vertical nature and shallow depths of the holes, drill hole deviation is not considered to significantly affect the downhole location of samples.

Specification of the grid system used.

WGS84 UTM Zone 36 South.

Quality and adequacy of topographic control.

DGPS pickups are considered to be high quality topographic control measures.

Data spacing & distribution

Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results.

Metallurgical Composite Sample: The hand-auger holes contributing to this metallurgical were selected from pit area Kingfisher and broadly represent early years of mining as contemplated in the OPFS (Approximately the first three years).

 

It is deemed that these holes should be broadly representative of the mineralisation style in the general area.

 

 

Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied.

Not applicable, no Mineral Resource or Ore Reserve estimations are covered by new data in this report. 

Whether sample compositing has been applied.

Metallurgical Composite Sample:

The sample was composited as described under Sampling Techniques in this Table.

 

 

Orientation of data in relation to geological structure

Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of possible structures and the extent to which this is known considering the deposit type

 

No bias attributable to orientation of sampling has been identified.

If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material.

 

All holes were drilled vertically as the nature of the mineralisation is horizontal. No bias attributable to orientation of drilling has been identified.

Sample security

The measures taken to ensure sample security

Samples are stored in secure storage from the time of drilling, through gathering, compositing and analysis.  The samples are sealed as soon as site preparation is complete.  

 

A reputable international transport company with shipment tracking enables a chain of custody to be maintained while the samples move from Malawi to Australia or Malawi to Johannesburg. Samples are again securely stored once they arrive and are processed at Australian laboratories. A reputable domestic courier company manages the movement of samples within Perth, Australia.  

 

At each point of the sample workflow the samples are inspected by a company representative to monitor sample condition. Each laboratory confirms the integrity of the samples upon receipt.  

Audits or reviews

The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data

 

It is considered by the Company that industry best practice methods have been employed at all stages of the exploration.

 

Malawi Field and Laboratory visits have been completed by Richard Stockwell in May 2022. A high standard of operation, procedure and personnel was observed and reported.

 

 

SECTION 2 – REPORTING OF EXPLORATION RESULTS

 

Criteria

Explanation

Commentary

Mineral tenement & land tenure status

Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites, wilderness or national park and environment settings.

The Company owns 100% of the following Exploration Licences (ELs) under the Mines and Minerals Act 2019 (Malawi), held in the Company’s wholly-owned, Malawi-registered subsidiaries: EL0609, EL0582, EL0492, EL0528, EL0545, EL0561, EL0657 and EL0710.

 

A 5% royalty is payable to the government upon mining and a 2% of net profit royalty is payable to the original project vendor.

 

No significant native vegetation or reserves exist in the area. The region is intensively cultivated for agricultural crops.

The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area.

The tenements are in good standing and no known impediments to exploration or mining exist.

Exploration done by other parties

 

Acknowledgement and appraisal of exploration by other parties.

Sovereign Metals Ltd is a first-mover in the discovery and definition of residual rutile and graphite deposits in Malawi.

Geology

Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation

The rutile deposit type is considered a residual placer formed by the intense weathering of rutile-rich basement paragneisses and variable enrichment by eluvial processes.

 

Rutile occurs in a mostly topographically flat area west of Malawi’s capital, known as the Lilongwe Plain, where a deep tropical weathering profile is preserved. A typical profile from top to base is generally soil (“SOIL” 0-1m) ferruginous pedolith (“FERP”, 1-4m), mottled zone (“MOTT”, 4-7m), pallid saprolite (“PSAP”, 7-9m), saprolite (“SAPL”, 9-25m), saprock (“SAPR”, 25-35m) and fresh rock (“FRESH” >35m).

 

The low-grade graphite mineralisation occurs as multiple bands of graphite gneisses, hosted within a broader Proterozoic paragneiss package. In the Kasiya areas specifically, the preserved weathering profile hosts significant vertical thicknesses from near surface of graphite mineralisation.

Drill hole information

A summary of all information material to the understanding of the exploration results including a tabulation of the following information for all Material drill holes: easting and northings of the drill hole collar; elevation or RL (Reduced Level-elevation above sea level in metres of the drill hole collar); dip and azimuth of the hole; down hole length and interception depth; and hole length

All intercepts relating to the Kasiya Deposit have been included in public releases during each phase of exploration and in this report. Releases included all collar and composite data and these can be viewed on the Company website.

There are no further drill hole results that are considered material to the understanding of the exploration results. Identification of the broad zone of mineralisation is made via multiple intersections of drill holes and to list them all would not give the reader any further clarification of the distribution of mineralisation throughout the deposit.

 

If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that the information is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from the understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly explain why this is the case

No information has been excluded.

Data aggregation methods

In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques, maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (e.g. cutting of high-grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material and should be stated.

No data aggregation was required.

Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high-grade results and longer lengths of low grade results, the procedure used for such aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of such aggregations should be shown in detail.

No data aggregation was required.

The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values should be clearly stated.

Not applicable

Relationship between mineralisation widths & intercept lengths

These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of Exploration Results.

The mineralisation has been released by weathering of the underlying, layered gneissic bedrock that broadly trends NE-SW at Kasiya North and N-S at Kasiya South. It lies in a laterally extensive superficial blanket with high-grade zones reflecting the broad bedrock strike orientation of ~045° in the North of Kasiya and 360° in the South of Kasiya.

No drilling intercepts are being reported.

If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is known, its nature should be reported.

The mineralisation is laterally extensive where the entire weathering profile is preserved and not significantly eroded. Minor removal of the mineralised profile has occurred where alluvial channels cut the surface of the deposit. These areas are adequately defined by the drilling pattern and topographical control for the resource estimate.

If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there should be a clear statement to this effect (e.g. ‘down hole length, true width not known’.

No drilling intercepts are being reported.

Diagrams

Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of intercepts should be included for any significant discovery being reported. These should include, but not be limited to a plan view of the drill collar locations and appropriate sectional views.

In exploration results and plan view for the samples used in relation to the metallurgical composite test work conducted in this announcement, are included in Sovereign’s announcements dated 30 March 2021, 18 August 2021 and 15 March 2022.

 

These are accessible on the Company’s and on the ASX websites.

Balanced reporting

Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not practicable, representative reporting of both low and high-grades and/or widths should be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of exploration results.

All results are included in this report and in previous releases. These are accessible on the Company’s webpage.

Other substantive exploration data

Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be reported including (but not limited to: geological observations; geophysical survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples – size and method of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock characteristics; potential deleterious or contaminating substances.

Limited lateritic duricrust has been variably developed at Kasiya, as is customary in tropical highland areas subjected to seasonal wet/dry cycles. Lithological logs record drilling refusal in just under 2% of the HA/PT drill database. No drilling refusal was recorded above the saprock interface by AC drilling.

Sample quality (representivity) is established by geostatistical analysis of comparable sample intervals.

 

Further work

The nature and scale of planned further work (e.g. test for lateral extensions or depth extensions or large-scale step-out drilling).

Having recently completed an OPFS, the Company is working towards completing a definitive feasibility study.

Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions, including the main geological interpretations and future drilling areas, provided this information is not commercially sensitive.

Refer to diagrams disclosed previous releases. These are accessible on the Company’s website as discussed above.

 

#BRES Blencowe Resources PLC – Blencowe Joins European EV Consortium

Blencowe Resources (LSE: BRES) is pleased to announce that it has accepted an invitation to join the prestigious international SAFELOOP consortium managed under the European Commission’s €100 billion Horizon Europe Programme, focussed on the European Union’s renewable energy transition.

SAFELOOP represents a transformative opportunity for Blencowe and its Orom-Cross Graphite Project in Uganda, positioning the project as a critical supplier in the European EV supply chain with exclusive access to premium pricing contracts, large-scale offtake commitments of up to 100,000 tonnes annually, and strategic partnerships with tier-one European gigafactories and EV manufacturers.

These strategic advantages further validate Orom-Cross as a globally significant project and position Blencowe to play a pivotal role in the growing demand for critical EV materials.

 

Key Highlights:

·    Exclusive Supplier Role: Orom-Cross to exclusively supply natural flake graphite concentrate for all anodes used in SAFELOOP Gen3 Li-Ion batteries, providing a high-quality source for this critical component.

·    Premium Pricing: SAFELOOP pricing expected to be significantly higher for graphite than for similar concentrate sold into Asian markets.

·    Large-Scale Offtakes: The programme targets up to 100,000 tonnes annually of small flake graphite at full ramp-up, providing a valuable long-term annuity income stream for Blencowe.

·    Strategic Partners: Close collaboration with a European Gigafactory, EV bus OEM, and other key partners and potential funding parties, all present further opportunities for Orom-Cross.

·    Green Credentials: Orom-Cross graphite to undergo EU Green Passport evaluation, enhancing other future offtake opportunities within the European and North American markets.

 

Further Details on AETC and other Downstream SAFELOOP Partners

Blencowe’s US technical partner, American Energy Technologies Co. (“AETC”), will will play a pivotal role in processing Orom-Cross graphite into battery-ready anode active materials. This collaboration ensures high-quality, fully integrated production within SAFELOOP, aligning with the programme’s focus on advancing European Gigafactory-scale battery solutions.

AETC, an established premium performance graphite processor, has conducted over 24 months of rigorous testing on Orom-Cross end-products in the United States, including pilot-scale and production-scale work.  Anode materials will be produced and delivered by AETC to the SAFELOOP-designated Gigafactory ASPILSAN of Kayseri, Turkiye.  ASPILSAN will manufacture Gen3 Li-Ion batteries, which will be supplied to transport manufacturing specialist, BOZANKAYA of Sincan, Turkiye, for integration into EV buses.

This process has confirmed the exceptional quality of Orom-Cross graphite, aligning it perfectly with the stringent requirements of the SAFELOOP programme. Following a competitive evaluation Blencowe was selected as the exclusive natural flake graphite concentrate supplier for the SAFELOOP Project.

This partnership underscores the value of Orom-Cross’s graphite as a critical input for high-performance battery anodes, while also enabling robust market opportunities through secure, premium pricing contracts.

 

Executive Chairman Cameron Pearce commented:

We are delighted to join the high profile SAFELOOP Project, positioning Blencowe at the heart of Europe’s transition to renewable energy.  Being chosen as the exclusive natural flake graphite concentrate supplier for SAFELOOP provides a potentially huge offtake opportunity ahead that can provide a valuable annuity income stream for our Company and long term value for shareholders.

“This selection is a testament to the high quality of Orom-Cross and the critical role it will play in the EV supply chain. The association with SAFELOOP also opens significant opportunities for Blencowe to further strengthen its position as a leader in the global graphite market, and, once again, setting our Project and our Company apart from our peers.”

 

AETC Manager of Government Relationship, Anna Doninger commented:

We are delighted that AETC was chosen as the processor of choice for two prestigious European Commission funded initiatives, STREAMS and SAFELOOP. Through these programs we are recovering, rejuvenating, and returning recycled graphite into the European lithium-ion battery supply chain, as well as processing primary feedstocks based on natural crystalline flake graphite and synthetic graphite precursors into anode active materials in advanced lithium-ion batteries for automotive applications.”

“Natural crystalline flake graphite from Orom-Cross has consistently demonstrated exceptional quality in AETC’s pilot and production scale test work conducted to date. The properties of Blencowe’s concentrate align perfectly with the expected demand for the European Gigafactory Li-Ion battery cells and exceed the EUCAR Hazard Level 3 standards for EV mobility applications, as required within SAFELOOP.   We are delighted to be working with Blencowe on this executive action and we are confident of a successful outcome of work planned as part of SAFELOOP.”

 

 

 

Vox Markets Interview

For further insights on Blencowe’s transformative role within the SAFELOOP initiative and the significance of this partnership for Orom-Cross, listen to CEO Mike Ralston’s latest interview with Vox Markets:

https://www.voxmarkets.co.uk/articles/interview-with-mike-ralston-ceo-of-blencowe-resources-59b4c8a

 

SAFELOOP Media Links:

European Commission Factsheet: https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101147342

SAFELOOP’s website: https://www.safeloop.eu/;

SAFELOOP Profile in x: x.com/SAFELOOP_EU)

SAFELOOP LinkedIn Profile:

www.linkedin.com/company/104652691

https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7237016010069786627 

 

About Project SAFELOOP

In our mobile society the demand for energy storage solutions has never been more critical. As we strive to build a sustainable future relying on renewable energy sources, the need for efficient and reliable energy storage becomes paramount. This is where EC’s new executive action, SAFELOOP, aims to make big strides contributing to the EU’s ambition to make Europe the first climate-neutral continent by 2050.

SAFELOOP stands for Securely Advancing Future EVs with Li-Ion batteries through Optimized Pathways. The Project’s primary goal is to elevate the safety, sustainability, and performance of European Gigafactory scale Li-Ion Battery cells, aligning with the EUCAR Hazard Level 3 standards for mobility applications. Beyond enhancing EU battery safety, the project seeks to develop the world’s first Electric Vehicles-rated Li-Ion Battery using up to 25% recycled and fully rejuvenated battery-active materials. SAFELOOP has received an initial €5 million EU grant for initial project development work, supporting these pioneering efforts.

SAFELOOP project officially started in Oulu, Finland in June 2024. This was the first meeting for the 15 partners that make up the consortium of the project, and an opportunity to set a strong foundation within the project for the 36 months of collaboration and development to come.

SAFELOOP is funded by the Horizon Europe – European Union’s flagship research and innovation funding program, with a budget of €100 billion. SAFELOOP is also a proud contributor to the BATT4EU partnership. Through its activities BATT4EU aims for the widespread adoption of e-mobility (EVs and E-buses) and stationary electrical energy storage. SAFELOOP will particularly support Batt4EU’s specific objective on the development of differentiating technologies in battery materials, cell design, and manufacturing and battery recycling.

The 36-months-long timeline of SAFELOOP action aligns closely with Blencowe’s strategy to bring Orom-Cross into production by 2026 and ramp up thereafter.  There is minimal cost to Blencowe within this test phase to be part of this initiative, and ultimately the Orom-Cross deposit is large enough to meet all anticipated graphite demand anticipated for SAFELOOP plus all other offtakers.

The ramped up SAFELOOP target requires up to 100,000 tonnes of natural flake concentrate annually and will provide Blencowe with a substantial offtake commitment from a tier one western offtaker. The indicative pricing for supply of small flake concentrate into SAFELOOP is more than double of what that same product currently sells for into Asian markets, making SAFELOOP a very valuable future initiative for Orom-Cross to be involved within.

 Of note, the non-spherical portion of graphite generated with Blencowe’s precursor will be upgraded and incorporated into cathodes of Gigafactory-scale-made lithium-ion batteries and into positive and negative electrodes of hybrid ultra-high-power supercapacitors by SAFELOOP Consortium Partners. The ability to use spheroidization process rejects in premium energy systems applications is the key to justifying the higher prices that will be paid for Blencowe’s concentrate for processing within AETC’s Inverted Flowsheet Technology.

Yields of close to 100% are anticipated when spherical and non-spherical graphites are added together, a prerequisite for cost leadership in advanced materials production even at moderately increased cost of graphite concentrate raw material.

Blencowe has entered a vendor-processor collaboration relationship with AETC ensuring exclusivity for the natural flake graphite component used within SAFELOOP. Work is already underway and will provide at least two Gigafactory scale lithium-ion 18650 battery cell-based manufacturing campaigns which will power EV buses. At the project onset, the SAFELOOP action requires Orom-Cross supplying 1000kg of small flake concentrate to AETC which has been completed.

As part of this testing phase Blencowe will pursue EU green passport evaluation for its graphite product, through an EU certified test center in Poland and through Imperial College London. This accreditation will have significant implications for future EU graphite sales and will provide additional marketing, commercialisation, and business development opportunities.

 

For further information please contact:

  Blencowe Resources Plc

 Sam Quinn

 

www.blencoweresourcesplc.com

Tel: +44 (0)1624 681 250

info@blencoweresourcesplc.com

Investor Relations

Sasha Sethi

Tel: +44 (0) 7891 677 441

sasha@flowcomms.com

Tavira Financial

Jonathan Evans

Tel: +44 (0)20 3192 1733

jonathan.evans@tavira.group

Vox Markets Interview:

https://www.voxmarkets.co.uk/articles/interview-with-mike-ralston-ceo-of-blencowe-resources-59b4c8a

Twitter https://twitter.com/BlencoweRes

LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/company/72382491/admin/

 

Background

Orom-Cross Graphite Project

Orom-Cross is a potential world class graphite project both by size and end-product quality, with a high component of more valuable larger flakes within the deposit.

A 21-year Mining Licence for the project was issued by the Ugandan Government in 2019 following extensive historical work on the deposit and Blencowe is now within the Definitive Feasibility Study phase as it drives towards first production.

Orom-Cross presents as a large, shallow open-pitable deposit, with a maiden JORC Indicated & Inferred Mineral Resource deposit of 24.5Mt @ 6.0% Total Graphite Content. Development of the resource is expected to benefit from a low strip ratio and free dig operations, thereby ensuring lower operating and capital costs.

In 3Q 2024 Blencowe introduced a Joint Venture concept with experienced downstream graphite processing partners to ultimately produce upgraded 99.95% SPG (spheronised, purified graphite) in Uganda.  This strategy has several key advantages including additional returns and substantial cost savings which will assist deliver a world class project once DFS is completed.

Blencowe also announced full Minerals Security Partnership (MSP) accreditation in 2024 which provides additional tier-one credibility plus further support from this highly influential quasi-Government organisation.  Together with the US$5 million grant funds received from the US Government in 2023 via the Development Finance Corporation, the Company is building unique and solid relationships to assist with funding solutions for Orom-Cross project implementation.

#BRES Blencowe Resources PLC – Conversion of 600 tonnes bulk sample to Graphite Concentrate

Blencowe Resources is pleased to report it has completed a critical step in commercial scale testing, by converting 600 tonnes of in situ raw material into 30 tonnes of graphite concentrate. The 600 tonnes bulk sample conversion was undertaken by Jilin New Technology Graphite Co. (“Jilin”), a market leader in graphite processing, with results reconfirming the attractive qualities of Orom-Cross graphite.

Highlights:

·    Commercial Scale delivery of concentrate: 600 tonnes of raw material shipped to China several months ago has now been successfully upgraded to 30 tonnes of 96% concentrate.

·    Maintaining High Quality: testing indicates that the Orom-Cross concentrate delivered in this sample size maintains the same high quality as previous smaller scale tests.

·    Bulk concentrate available: Blencowe now has substantial quantity of both large and small flake concentrate products to apply further testing for potential offtakers.

·    Final Stage testing on Small Flakes: Leading SPG producer Qindao Taida Carbon Co Ltd (“Taida”) to beneficiate 20 tonnes of small flake concentrate into 10 tonnes of 99.95% uncoated SPG (spheronised purified graphite) over the next one month as the final step in the qualification process.

·    Ongoing Tier-One Discussions: The bulk sample testing and qualification process is going to plan, with the end goal ultimately being offtake agreements with several tier one partners.

·    Hurdle achieved for further DFC grant funds: The completion of this stage of the test work is one of the milestones for another tranche of DFC grant funding to be released shortly.

Jilin Concentrate

Jilin, who successfully completed a 100 tonne bulk sample for Blencowe in 2023, has now completed a 600t bulk sample to concentrates.  Approximately 30 tonnes of concentrate has been produced, which represents a substantial sample size for the Company to use for ongoing trials at various offtakers, for both large and small flake products.

Test results indicate a very high quality 96% concentrate for small flake products and 96-97% concentrate for large flake products (+100mesh, +80mesh and +50mesh).  The concentrate mix is 55/45 as small/large flakes.

Jilin has already highlighted its support for the larger flake Orom-Cross concentrate product by signing an MOU for 15,000tpa, which was announced to the market in May 2024.

Next Step: SPG Production

Work has now begun at one of the most experienced graphite beneficiation companies in the world, Qingdao Taida Carbon Co Ltd, to deliver 10 tonnes of high quality uncoated SPG product from the small flake concentrate.  This has been successfully completed previously via smaller scale testing but this will be the first commercial scale delivery of SPG from Orom-Cross to provide necessary samples for high profile tier one offtakers to test in their own facilities.  Once the OEM testing is completed by end of the June quarter Orom-Cross will effectively be qualified and have the ability to move to offtake agreements for all end products used in batteries.

Taida has been producing uncoated SPG for over two decades and has one of the most advanced facilities in China, and is generally regarded as one of the leading experts in anode-ready graphite products worldwide.  Having Taida expertise manage Orom-Cross concentrate through to SPG is a key advantage as this company has the skill and prowess to deliver the best end results.

Blencowe is developing a broader graphite strategy to incorporate downstream processing in Uganda to deliver 99.95% SPG made in-country, and will be looking to include leading experts such as Taida within that strategy.  This proposed facility would be the first commercial scale SPG operation outside of China and Blencowe would produce a valuable downstream product that other graphite mining peers cannot easily replicate.  The Company will continue to provide updates as this strategy evolves.

Offtake Agreements

The process to complete all necessary metallurgical test work, including bulk sample testing, is a pre-requisite for all graphite miners that want to sell their end products into battery markets.  End users are particularly discerning and will not consider offtake agreements until this work is adequately completed and qualification is therefore attained.  Blencowe has been guided through this process by parties who have successfully completed this qualification previously, and using experts who understand the nuances of all the products, and how to get the best out of what Orom-Cross has to offer.

The end target is offtake agreements for 100% of the products that Blencowe will mine and process from Orom-Cross, and to achieve the highest quality that builds strong tier one relationships and delivers the highest prices.  The Company is moving swiftly towards qualification and with that the potential for offtake partnerships with some of the leading brand names in this business.

Funding

The completion of the conversion of raw material into concentrate represents one of the milestones to allow for further DFC (Development Finance Corporation) grant funds to be released shortly.

Executive Chairman Cameron Pearce commented:

“We have highlighted this bulk sample test requirement as a key component of the Definitive Feasibility Study and we have undergone this process using some of the most experienced graphite producers in the world, and in doing so we have opened some interesting doors for additional value-add strategy.  We will continue to press forward to get to our goal of having tier one offtake agreements in place as soon as possible for all of our end products, which will underline the unique status of Blencowe Resources as a standout graphite producer for the future.”

 

For further information please contact:

  Blencowe Resources Plc

 Sam Quinn

 

www.blencoweresourcesplc.com

Tel: +44 (0)1624 681 250

info@blencoweresourcesplc.com

Investor Relations

Sasha Sethi

Tel: +44 (0) 7891 677 441

sasha@flowcomms.com

Tavira Financial

Jonathan Evans

Tel: +44 (0)20 3192 1733

jonathan.evans@tavira.group

Twitter https://twitter.com/BlencoweRes

LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/company/72382491/admin/

Background

Orom-Cross Graphite Project

Orom-Cross is a potential world class graphite project both by size and end-product quality, with a high component of more valuable larger flakes within the deposit.

A 21-year Mining Licence for the project was issued by the Ugandan Government in 2019 following extensive historical work on the deposit and Blencowe is now within the Definitive Feasibility Study phase as it drives towards first production.

Orom-Cross presents as a large, shallow open-pitable deposit, with a maiden JORC Indicated & Inferred Mineral Resource deposit of 24.5Mt @ 6.0% Total Graphite Content. Development of the resource is expected to benefit from a low strip ratio and free dig operations, thereby ensuring lower operating and capital costs.

#BRES Blencowe Resources PLC – Annual Financial Report

Blencowe Resources Plc, the natural resources company focused on the development of the Orom-Cross Graphite Project in Uganda, is pleased to announce its audited financial results for the year ended 30 September 2023 (the “Annual Report”) and it’s notice of Annual General Meeting (“Notice of AGM”).

The Annual Report which includes an unqualified audit report and audited Financial Statement for the year ended 30 September 2023 & The Notice of AGM and the associated Form of Proxy will be made available on the Company’s website at www.blencoweresourcesplc.com.  Hard copies will be posted to the Company’s shareholders.

For further information, please contact:

Blencowe Resources

Sam Quinn

 

www.blencoweresourcesplc.com

Tel: +44 (0) 1624 681 250

info@blencoweresourcesplc.com

 

Investor Enquiries

Sasha Sethi

Tel: +44 (0) 7891 677 441

sasha@flowcomms.com

 

Tavira Financial Limited

Jonathan Evans

Tel: +44 (0)20 7100 5100

jonathan.evans@tavirasecurities.com

 

First Equity Limited

Jason Robertson

Tel: +44 (0)203 192 1733

jasonrobertson@firstequitylimited.com

Chief Executive Officer’s Statement for the period ended 30 September 2023 

Shareholders and Stakeholders,

It gives me great pleasure to reflect on another year of progress within Blencowe and our continued efforts to unlock the value sitting in our Orom-Cross graphite project in Uganda.  This project remains one of the largest, highest quality graphite projects in the world and in a market which is forecast to demand exponential tonnage of graphite ahead, in particular to deliver the huge number of batteries to power electric vehicles and store renewable energy, we are operating in very exciting times.

Our main focus of energy and efforts this past year have been in commencing the Definitive Feasibility Study (DFS) which is the last major study required prior to investment decision, and one that requires a lot more work and cost than the previous Scoping or Pre-Feasibility Studies.  The DFS started in the early calendar year and was expected to take 12 months, but longer than anticipated time taken to secure necessary funding has meant the DFS will only be completed by end of 2024.  The DFS requires four major thrusts; firstly, mining and infrastructure development at site; secondly revised environmental impact studies to extend the previous EIS that was done in conjunction with our mining license award in 2019; thirdly bulk sample testing in China to ultimately secure offtake contracts; and fourthly, providing a full project funding solution, for the DFS costs themselves but thereafter to implement the strategy and build the mine.

As the DFS has progressed a fifth element has now been added, which is downstream processing of graphite from a concentrate to a purified product.  This is being considered as a means to significantly enhance the overall value of the project.

I am pleased to report that all DFS work to date has yielded positive results, with no exceptions.  Earlier in the calendar year we mined 100 tonnes of material from Orom-Cross and shipped this to China where it underwent commercial scale testing to show that we can process and deliver the same high quality end concentrate from a much larger quantity than we had previously proven we could deliver from lab-scale testing.  This pilot testing in China has been very successful and by showcasing our product over there we have also opened many doors for future relationships; in simple terms our product is well received there which is good as China accounts for the vast majority of the graphite market today.  We are using very experienced partners to build these relationships in China, experts who have taken other graphite companies through this same qualification process, so we are confident we will end up with a good end result from this in 2024.  In order to seek tier one partnerships for offtake we are now embarking on a further 600 tonne bulk sample to go through the same pilot testing procedure over the next six months and if successful this will hopefully complete our pre-qualification process and allow us to move to negotiate initial offtake agreements which are vital to the DFS.

Work continues in Uganda on all facets of infrastructure and environment, and we are building a strong team there to take ownership of in-country requirements.  Government of Uganda support remains firm as does local community support.

The process to find a tier one strategic funding partner has taken us longer than anticipated but has ultimately borne exceptional results, as the Company was able to sign a Technical Assistance Grant with the US International Development Funding Corporation (DFC) in September 2023 for a US$5 million grant to Blencowe for DFS costs, as well as DFC mandated as lead partner to help provide a full project funding solution ahead.  Having the US Government as our strategic partner has obvious benefits and we are very proud to be the first and only graphite company that DFC have partnered with to date in this regard.  Whilst this took time to lock down this grant it was absolutely worth the wait and Blencowe now has a strong funding partner ahead which is the envy of many of our peers in the graphite market.

The shift in focus to consider further downstream processing is gathering momentum, and this could have a colossal impact on the value that Orom-Cross brings to Blencowe.  Whilst mining and processing graphite to a 96% concentrate was proven to be a profitable venture in the PFS we have come to realise that further processing of that concentrate to a 99.95% purified product can yield considerably higher margins and Blencowe is now considering all options how it can get involved in this downstream market.  There is substantial IP (intellectual property) involved which is held by existing processing companies so any such a move would involve partnering with one or more of these processing experts, but work is underway to consider several alternatives.

Further work has been completed using international technical experts to ascertain the quality of Orom-Cross graphite as it upgrades from 96% concentrate to a purified 99.95% end product, and I am pleased to say the results have been outstanding, with Orom-Cross having passed with flying colours.  At the end of the day each graphite project is unique, with inherent chemical characteristicst hat are different to each project, and which largely define the quality of the end product and therefore price and demand for these end products.  As we continue to test Orom-Cross through to 99.95% purified product we continue to learn of its exceptional chemical properties and these characteristics will ultimately be the advantage that helps shape key relationships, offtake partners and contracts.

 

I would like to reach out to all the consultants, partners, and other relationships we have built to thank all of them for their efforts, including our internal management team.  We are in very exciting times as the green energy revolution gathers pace and the graphite market is evolving fast due to a variety of factors, including geopolitics.  Each and every one of these partnerships is critical to our success ahead and we value their expertise and support.

I would also like to thank our shareholders and the wider market for your support, and in particular our major shareholders who have stuck by us through what have been challenging market conditions.  We offer the ability to be part of something unique as we develop this exceptional project, and we hope that we can continue to justify your faith and your investment.

Mike Ralston

Chief Executive officer

The Directors present the Strategic Report for the year ended 30 September 2023.

Results

The results are set out in the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income on page 29. The total comprehensive loss attributable to the equity holders of the Group for the period was £1,366,685 (2022: £1,089,679).

The Group paid no distribution or dividends during the period.

Business model, review of the business and future developments

The Group’ principal activity is the exploration of Orom-Cross Graphite Project in Northern Uganda, which it owns through its 100% subsidiary Consolidated African Resources Limited ‘CARU’.

The Group’s aim is to create value for shareholders through the discovery and development of economic mineral deposits.  The Group’s strategy is to continue to progress the development of its existing project in Uganda and to evaluate its existing and new mineral resource opportunities.

The Group’s business is directed by the Board and is managed on a day-to-day basis by the Executive Chairman, Cameron Pearce.  The Board monitors compliance with objectives and policies of the Group through performance reporting, budget updates and periodic operational reviews.

Key performance indicators (KPIs)

Financial KPIs

Results for the year

With no income in the year the Group continues to monitor the loss before tax to ensure the continued viability of the Group and ability to continue to develop the Orom-Cross Graphite Project. The Group has made a loss before tax of £1,397,967 for the year ended 30 September 2023 (2022: loss before tax of £1,085,474).

Exploration expenditure – funding and development costs

At this stage in the Group’s development, the Group is focusing on financing and continued development of the Orom-Cross Graphite Project. Therefore, the funding and development costs of Orom-Cross Graphite project have been chosen as Key Performance Indicators.

The Group incurred £1,190,977 (2022: £1,423,236) of capitalised exploration costs. These exploration costs are in line with the Board expectations.

In 2023 the Group raised funds of £1,313,820 net of issue costs (2022: £2,628,748) from the equity markets.  Please see note 20 for further details of the funds raised after the year end.

At 30 September 2023 the Group had a cash balance of £129,853 (2022: £346,994).

Employees

There were two employees during the year apart from the directors, the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and the Chief Operating Officer (“COO”), who are the key management personnel. All current members of the Board and the key management personnel are males. For more information about the Group’s key management personnel see note 7.

Social, Community and Human Rights Issues

The Orom-Cross Graphite Project is still at an early stage of project development and further consideration will need to be given to social, community and human rights issues affecting the Project. Currently a key consideration is that under Ugandan law the Company is required to rehabilitate the area affected by the mining activities. Accordingly, there will be a potential cost associated with undertaking this obligation. At this time, although the Group continues to explore and test the minerals, the land has not been affected and therefore the Group has not accounted for any costs associated with the rehabilitation of the area.

On 10 September 2022 CARU signed a revised agreement with the local communal land association of Locomo village for the land surface rights and has agreed to help provide local education and sensitization of the local communities in Akurumo parish on the opportunities and advantages of mining graphite. CARU will give employment priorities to the local capable members of Akurumo parish.

Since the acquisition of CARU the Group has donated to local causes, such as a scholarship programme and to fight against COVID-19. The Group will continue to donate to the local communities around the region of Uganda in which the Project Licences are located.

Principal risks and uncertainties and risk management

The Group operates in an uncertain environment and is subject to a number of risk factors. The Directors have carried out a robust assessment on the principal risks facing the Group, including those that threaten its business model, future performance, solvency or liquidity. 

The Group continues to monitor the principal risks and uncertainties with the help of specialists to ensure that any emerging risk are identified, managed and mitigated. There has been no significant impact to the Group from the Russia-Ukraine conflict and the Israel-Palestine conflict.

Geological risks

On 19 July 2022, the Group completed the pre- feasibility study for the Orom-Cross graphite project and a net present value (post tax) assessment of $482million has been estimated from the project. The pre-feasibility study indicates a robust, long-term, and profitable mining operation at Orom-Cross. The Pre-feasibility study was managed by leading graphite technical experts Battery Limits Pty Limited (Australia), who have delivered several other graphite project feasibility study in the past. The estimated production per annum will be 36,000tpa as 96-97% end products and increasing this to 147,000tpa in stages. It is estimated that 50% of the product is +100 to +50 mesh fractions.  The pre-feasibility study estimated a US$1,307/t weighted average selling price for a basket of end products and US$499/t operating costs, underlining one of the lowest cost graphite projects worldwide.  On 26 September 2022 the Group announced that it had commenced the definitive feasibility study with completion date 2H-2023.

On 6 December 2022, the Group completed the metallurgical test work on substantially up-scaled quantities of Orom-Cross composite mix. The additional metallurgical test work on Orom-Cross graphite continues to deliver a high-quality grade graphite concentrate. The program was designed to deliver the following objectives:

1.   Confirm a 95-97% total graphite content, pure concentrate with low impurities.

2.   Confirm 90% recovery is achievable for this concentrate.

3.   Confirm the liberation process to maintain a high percentage of Jumbo/XL/Large flakes within concentrate.

4.   Confirm process flow diagram for plant design as part of the Definitive Feasibility Study.

5.   Deliver bulk concentrate samples to allow Blencowe to initiate discussions with potential off-take partners.

On 11 January 2023 the Ugandan Government approved a landmark one-off permit for Blencowe to export bulk sample graphite from Orom-Cross for key Metallurgical final testing. 100 tonnes of bulk samples were mined, and fast track delivered to China by air freight for initial off -site testing with a Chinese experienced graphite processing specialist Jilin Huiyang New Material Technology Company Limited. Blencowe also send an additional 5kg of concentrate to Chicago-based graphite specialist AET Co, which is a recognized industry expert in SPG (spheronised purified graphite) and expandability testing.

On 23 January 2023, the group appointed a leading firm from Perth, CPC Engineering to lead, develop and sign off the Definitive Feasibility study.

The Group uses advisors with specialist knowledge in mining and related environmental management for reducing the impacts of environmental risk.

Government regulation and political risk

The Group’s operating activities are subject to laws and regulations governing expropriation of property, health and worker safety, employment standards, waste disposal, protection of the environment, mine development, land and water use, prospecting, mineral production, exports, taxes, labour standards, occupational health standards, toxic wastes, the protection of endangered and protected species and other matters. While the Group believes that it is in substantial compliance with all material current laws and regulations affecting its activities, future changes in applicable laws, regulations, agreements or changes in their enforcement or regulatory interpretation could result in changes in legal requirements or in the terms of existing permits and agreements applicable to the Group or its properties, which could have a material adverse impact on the Group’s current operations or planned exploration and development projects. Where required, obtaining necessary permits and licences can be a complex, time consuming process and the Group cannot assure whether any necessary permits will be obtainable on acceptable terms, in a timely manner or at all. The costs and delays associated with obtaining necessary permits and complying with these permits and applicable laws and regulations could stop or materially delay or restrict the Group from proceeding with any future exploration or development of its properties. Any failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations or permits, even if inadvertent, could result in interruption or closure of exploration, development or mining operations or material fines, penalties or other liabilities.

The Orom-Cross Graphite Project is located in Uganda. The Group’s activities may be affected in varying degrees by political stability and governmental regulations. Any changes in regulations or shifts in political attitudes in the country or any other countries in which the Group may operate are beyond the control of the Group and may adversely affect its operations. To mitigate this risk, the Board continues to review any changes on the government regulations and the political stability in Uganda.

Pricing risk

The development and success of any project of the Group will be primarily dependent on the future prices of graphite. The graphite prices are subject to significant fluctuation and are affected by a number of factors which are beyond the control of the Group. Such factors include, but are not limited to exchange rates, fluctuations in the value of the United States dollar and foreign currencies, global and regional supply and demand, and political and economic conditions. The price of graphite and other commodities have fluctuated widely in recent years, and future price declines could cause any future development of and commercial production from the Group’s property to be impracticable. Although the Group expects to have sufficient working capital for the Working Capital Period, depending on the price of graphite, projected cash flow from planned mining operations may not be sufficient for future operations and the Group could be forced to discontinue any further development and may lose its interest in, or may be forced to sell, some or all of its properties. Future production from the Orom-Cross Graphite Project is dependent on the production of graphite that is adequate to make the project economically viable. The Board regularly monitors the prices of graphite and is prepared to raise further capital if it is required.

Commodity and currency risk

As the Groups’ potential earnings will be largely derived from the sale of graphite, the Group’s future revenues and cash flows will be impacted by changes in the prices and available market of this commodity. Any substantial decline in the price of graphite or in transport or distribution costs may have a material adverse effect on the Group.

Commodity prices fluctuate and are affected by numerous factors beyond the control of the Group. These factors include current and expected future supply and demand, forward selling by producers, production cost levels in major mineral producing centers as well as macroeconomic conditions such as inflation and interest rates.

Furthermore, the international prices of most commodities are denominated in United States dollars while the Group cost base will be in Pounds Sterling and Ugandan Shilling. Consequently, changes in the Pound Sterling and Ugandan Shilling exchange rates will impact on the earnings of the Group. The exchange rates are affected by numerous factors beyond the control of the Group, including international markets, interest rates, inflation and the general economic outlook.  The Directors are confident that they have put in place a strong management team capable of dealing with the above issues as they arise.

Financing

On 27 April 2023 the Group announced that it had found a strategic funding partner for the Orom-Cross Graphite project, and this was completed on 22 September 2023. The Development Finance Corporation (DFC) engaged to fund 50% of Project Definitive Feasibility Study costs by way of a technical assistance grant. US International Development Finance Corporation is America’s leading development finance institution that partners with the private sector to provide finance solutions for project development in markets deemed critical.  As of 10 October 2023, the Group received $1 million of the $5 million technical grant funding from the Development Finance Corporation. The Group is likely to remain cash flow negative for some time and, although the Directors have confidence in the future revenue earning potential of the Group from its interests in the Orom-Cross Graphite Project, there can be no certainty that the Group will achieve or sustain profitability or positive cash flow from its operating activities. With regards to future capital expenditure on the Orom-Cross Graphite Project, the Company will need to raise additional capital during the next 12 months in order to fully fund completion of the Definitive Feasibility Study.

The Group has been approached by potential strategic partners who may eventually provide an offtake, funding or development scenario for the Orom-Cross graphite project. If this is not successful, the Board may consider stopping the project until further cash can be generated.

Future mineral prices, revenues, taxes, capital expenditures and operating expenses and geological success will all be factors which will have an impact on the amount of additional capital required. Additionally, if the Group acquires further exploration assets or is granted additional permits and/or exploration licences, this may increase its financial commitments in respect of the Group’s exploration activities.

In common with many exploration entities, the Group will need to raise further funds in order to progress the Group from pre-construction phase of its business and eventually into production of revenues.

Environmental and safety

The Orom-Cross Graphite Project is still at an early stage of project development and further consideration will need to be given to environmental and social issues affecting the Orom-Cross Graphite Project. Environmental and safety legislation (e.g. in relation to reclamation, disposal of waste products, protection of wildlife and otherwise relating to environmental protection) may change in a manner that may require stricter or additional standards than those now in effect, a heightened degree of responsibility for companies and their directors and employees and more stringent enforcement of existing laws and regulations. There may also be unforeseen environmental liabilities resulting from both future and historic exploration or mining activities, which may be costly to remedy. Risks may include on-site sources of environmental contamination such as oil and fuel from the mining equipment and rehabilitation of the site upon expiry of the Project Licences. Under Ugandan law the Company is required to rehabilitate the area affected by the mining activities, accordingly there will be a potential cost associated with undertaking this obligation. It is currently unknown what this could be but the funding of this could have a material impact on the Group’s financial position in the future.

If the Group is unable to fully remedy an environmental problem, it may be required to stop or suspend operations or enter into interim compliance measures pending completion of the required remedy. The potential exposure may be significant and could have a material adverse effect on the Group.

The Group has not purchased insurance for environmental risks (including potential liability for pollution or other hazards as a result of the disposal of waste products occurring from exploration and production) as it is not generally available at a price which the Group regards as reasonable.

Environmental management systems are in place to mitigate environmental hazard risks. The Group uses advisors with specialist knowledge in mining and related environmental management for reducing the impacts of environmental risk.

Task Force on Climate -related Financial Disclosures (TCFD)

The Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures was convened by the Financial Stability Board to produce a common global framework for companies to report on how climate change will affect their business.

To help investors and wider stakeholders understand how companies are managing climate related financial risks, the TCFD recommends that companies make disclosures across four key areas, often referred to as the four pillars.

The directors support the initiatives of the TCFD, and has prepared disclosures to a level of detail that the directors consider to be consistent with the TCFD recommended disclosures, and as appropriate to the current position of the Group as an exploration entity.

The directors consider that several of the specific disclosures sought under TCFD recommendations will be less meaningful to users at the current stage of the Company’s Orom-Cross Project and will have greater relevance at the conclusion of the DFS (due to be completed by the end of 2024) and following the commissioning of the Orom-Cross Project.

1.         Governance

The Company view climate related risks and opportunities as growing in importance. The Board is ultimately responsible for the oversight and compliance with local environmental laws at its exploration location in Uganda, together with assessment of the impact of climate change on risk to the organisation.

In advance of commissioning the project operations, the Group will establish a Sustainability Committee, comprising the Chairman, the Chief Executive Officer and a non-executive director, that will guide and support the Group’s environmental approach and plans with respect to climate-related matters. The Committee will also consider and set appropriate Group policies that will govern how management assess and manage the risks and opportunities following commissioning.

Management of the group, who are involved with the ongoing DFS are responsible for assessing and managing climate -related risks and opportunities through the current study and will input to plans and assessments related to the ESIA (environmental and social impact assessment) and ESG (environmental, social and governance) components of the study.

2.         Strategy

The Group’s project at Orom-Cross is currently in the stage of completing its Definitive Feasibility Study, the outcome of which in 2024 will include more detail and assessment to define the Group’s strategic approach to climate-related matters.

The current global movement towards clean energy and storage solutions, in which graphite forms an integral part, together with technological advances in the use of graphite are an exciting opportunity for the Group to be a significant part of sustainable energy solutions.

3.         Risk management

Identification and assessment of climate related risks and opportunities in relation to the Group’s activities is performed by management on an ad-hoc basis. Management have not assessed there to be any significant climate-related risks that impact on the current exploration activity in Uganda.

The Group is currently completing the DFS, which will include ESIA and ESG assessments that will assist management to detail the climate related risks and opportunities relating to development of the project. Identification and mitigation of these risks will be addressed by the planned Sustainability Committee described in the Governance section of this statement.

At this time the Group operates no corporate offices either for the management team, or in Uganda, and has no operational graphite production activity. As such management have assessed that no significant greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are currently produced.

As the project progresses through the DFS, the risk management framework is somewhat fluid and will be analysed, adapted and expanded as the various study components of the DFS develop.  The Group is identifying and developing a ‘leave no trace’ solution to development wherever possible including utilising renewable energy supply and electrification options for operations. These actions will be included in the output of the DFS.

The Group currently employs the foundations of ISO Risk Management standards 31000, and will develop this by engaging in the certification process for this standard. Climate risks will be identified in detail in the ESIA and ESG assessments that form part of the DFS.

Management have not identified any climate-related scenarios that are expected to impact the resilience of the current exploration works performed by the Group. Assessment of different climate scenarios will be included in the works performed for the DFS.

4.         Metrics and targets

The Company will define the metrics and performance targets to assess the climate-related risks and opportunities in line with its strategy and risk management processes once the Orom-Cross operation has been commissioned. Initially some of these will be outlined as part of the ESIA and ESG assessments currently being undertaken for the project DFS.

As the current exploration operations of the Group have a minimal physical presence, Greenhouse Gas emissions are not currently recorded. However as part of the ESIA and ESG study works, the Group is developing the systems and reporting standards to track these in preparation for development of the project.

 

Taxation

 

Following an inspection by the Ugandan Revenue Authority (URA) of the tax affairs of Consolidated African Resources Uganda (“CARU”) covering the period between January 2014 and December 2022, the Group has incurred a capital gains tax charge of £392,425 as set out in Note 8 to the Financial Statements. This charge related to the acquisition by the Company of CARU in 2019. The amount was chargeable to the former owners, however this was not settled by them and under Ugandan legislation the liability is reclaimable from the acquirer if it cannot be obtained from the seller. Following advice from in-country tax advisors the Company is currently in discussions with the Ugandan Revenue Authority (URA) regarding options available to the Company to either pursue the seller for the tax liability or to seek a reduction or payment plan for the liability.

 

Section 172 Statement

 

The Board believes they have acted in a way most likely to promote the success of the Group for the benefit of its members as a whole, as required by section 172.

The requirements of section 172 are or the Board to:

·      consider the likely consequences of any decision in the long term,

·      act fairly between the members of the Group,

·      maintain a reputation for high standards of business conduct,

·      consider the interest of the Group’s employees,

·      foster the Group’s relationship with suppliers, customers and others, and

·    consider the impact of the Group’s operations on the community and the environment.

The Group operates a mineral exploration business, which is inherently speculative in nature and, without regular income, is dependent upon fund-raising for its continued operation.  The pre-revenue nature of the business is important to the understanding of the Group by its members, employees and suppliers, and the Directors are as transparent about the cash position and funding requirements as is allowed under LSE regulations.

The principal decisions taken by the Board during the year relate to the ongoing research and development of the Orom-Cross Graphite Project, which since its acquisition in 2020 is still at an early stage of project development. The Board has looked to build upon the information available and the exploration activities carried out by the Subsidiary prior to its acquisition. Through work such as Metallurgical testwork and preliminary economic assessment the board continues to gather information on the long-term viability of the project and the impact on the local community and the environment. The Board have outlined a work program for the future strategy of the Project. In order to carry out its strategy, the company has entered into a number of contracts with providers who are best placed to undertake the necessary research and review.

The Board is ultimately responsible for the direction, management, performance and long-term sustainable success of the Group. It sets the Group’s strategy and objective considering the interest of all its stakeholders. A good understanding of the Company’s stakeholders enables the Board to factor the potential impact of strategic decisions on each stakeholder group into a boardroom discussion. By considering the Company’s purpose, vision and values together with its strategic priorities the Board aims to make sure that its decisions are fair. The Board has always taken decisions for the long term and consistently aims to uphold the highest standards of business conduct. Board resolutions are always determined with reference to the interests of the Company’s employees, its business relationships with suppliers and customers. Wherever possible, local communities are engaged in the geological operations and support functions required for field operations providing much needed employment and wider economic benefits to the local communities. In addition, the Group contributes annually towards a scholarship programme for the local community in Uganda. The Board takes seriously its ethical responsibilities to the communities and environment in which it works.  We abide by the local and relevant UK laws on anti-corruption and bribery.

The Group follows international best practice on environmental aspects of our work.

 

 

                    

Cameron Pearce

Director
30 January 2024

The Directors submit their report with the audited Financial Statements for the year ended 30 September 2023.

General information

Blencowe Resources Plc (“the Company”), was incorporated as a private Limited Company under the laws of England and Wales with registered number 10966847 on 18 September 2017.  On 13 July 2018, the Company was re-registered as a public company under the Companies Act 2006.

Blencowe’s primary focus is on exploration of the Orom-Cross Graphite Project located in Northern Uganda.

Results for the year and distributions

The Group results are set out in the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income. The total consolidated comprehensive loss attributable to the equity holders of the Group for the financial year was £1,366,685 (2022: £1,089,679).  The Group received no income, and the full amount of the loss is due to expenses incurred in capital raising (to the extent not deducted from share premium), and general corporate overheads.

The Group paid no distribution or dividends during the financial year (2022: £Nil).

Subsidiary change of name

On 7 March 2023 Blencowe Resources Uganda Limited a 100% owned subsidiary of Blencowe Resources Plc changed its name to Consolidated African Resources Limited.

The Board of Directors

The Directors who held office during the financial year and to the reporting date, together with details of their interest in the shares of the Company at the reporting date were:

Number of Ordinary Shares

Percentage of Ordinary Shares

Sam Quinn

4,916,667

2.35%

Cameron Pearce

7,516,667

3.59%

Alexander Passmore

1,550,000

0.74%

The Board comprises of one Executive Director and two Non-Executive Directors as detailed below:

Cameron Pearce – Executive Chairman

Cameron Pearce was a founder of the Company and has extensive professional experience in both the Australian and United Kingdom finance industries. In recent times he has provided corporate, strategic, financial and advisory assistance to private and public companies in both Australia and the United Kingdom. Mr Pearce is a member of the Australian Institute of Chartered Accountants and has been in commerce over twenty years holding senior financial and management positions in both publicly listed and private enterprises in Australia, Europe, Asia, Africa and Central America. Mr. Pearce has considerable corporate and international expertise and over the past decade has focussed on mining and exploration activities.

Sam Quinn – Non Executive Director                                                   

Sam Quinn is a corporate lawyer with over a decade’s worth of experience in the natural resources sector, in both legal counsel and executive management positions. Mr Quinn was formerly the Director of Corporate Finance and Legal Counsel for the Dragon Group, a London-based natural resources venture capital firm and is currently a partner of Silvertree Partners, a natural resource focussed back office outsourcing business. Mr Quinn has in addition held several management roles for listed and unlisted natural companies and has gained significant experience in the administration, operation, financing and promotion of natural resource companies. Prior to working in the natural resources sector, Mr Quinn worked as a corporate lawyer for Jackson McDonald Barristers & Solicitors in Perth, Western Australia and for Nabarro LLP in London.

Alex Passmore – Non Executive Director

Alex Passmore is an experienced corporate executive with strong financial and technical background. Mr Passmore managed the arrangement of debt for many well-known resources companies and has a wealth of experience in project evaluation. He also managed the WA natural resources business of CBA which comprised a substantial portfolio of loan, hedge, trade finance and working capital products to ASX-listed and multi-national resource companies. Prior to this, Mr Passmore held senior roles at Patersons Securities and was director of corporate finance and head of research. Mr Passmore holds a BSc (Hons) in Geology from the University of Western Australia and a graduate diploma of Applied Finance and Investments from the Institute of Securities Australia.

Directors’ indemnities

To the extent permitted by law and the Articles, the Company has made qualifying third-party indemnity provisions for the benefit of its directors during the year, which remain in force at the date of this report.

 

Policy for new appointments

Without prejudice to the power of the Company to appoint any person to be a Director pursuant to the Articles the Board shall have power at any time to appoint any person who is willing to act as a Director, either to fill a vacancy or as an addition to the existing Board, but the total number of Directors (other than alternate directors) must not be less than two and must not be more than 15 in accordance with the Articles. Any Director so appointed shall hold office only until the annual general meeting of the Company next following such appointment and shall then be eligible for re-election but shall not be taken into account in determining the number of Directors who are to retire by rotation at that meeting. If not re-appointed at such annual general meeting, he shall vacate office at the conclusion thereof.

Rules for amendments of articles

Directors cannot alter the Company’s Articles unless a special resolution is approved by the shareholders. A special resolution requires at least 75% of a company’s members to vote in favour for it to pass.

Substantial shareholders

The share capital of Blencowe consist of only one class: ordinary shares. Therefore, all of the Company’s shares rank pare passu and no preferential rights apply. No single person directly or indirectly, individually or collectively, exercises control over the Company. The Directors are aware of the following persons, who had an interest in 3% or more of the issued ordinary share capital of the Company as at 30 September 2023:

Shareholder

% of issued share capital of the Company

  Pershing Nominees Limited

 23.91%

  Hargreaves Lansdown (Nominees) Limited

16.46%

Interactive investors services Nominees Limited

9.57%

Lawshare Nominees Limited

6.08%

Vidacos Nominees Limited

5.11%

James Brearley Crest Nominees Limited

4.02%

HSDL Nominees Limited

3.40%

The Directors are not aware of any changes in interests between 30 September 2023 and the date of approval of the financial statements.

Financial risk management

The Group’s principal financial instruments comprise cash balances, accounts payable and other receivables arising in the normal course of its operations.

The Group’s objectives when managing capital are to safeguard the Group’s ability to continue as a going concern in order to provide returns for shareholders and benefits for other stakeholders and to maintain an optimal capital structure to reduce the cost of capital. In order to maintain or adjust the capital structure, the Group may adjust the amount of dividends paid to shareholders, return capital to shareholders, issue new shares, or sell assets to reduce debt.

The Group’s activities expose it to a variety of financial risks: market risk, credit risk, liquidity risk and cash flow interest rate risk. See note 18.2 for more information on the financial risk management objectives and policies.

Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions

The energy consumption has not been disclosed as the Group’s consumption is below 40,000 kWh.

Responsibility statement

The Directors are responsible for preparing the Annual Report and the Financial Statements in accordance with applicable law and regulations.

Company law requires the Directors to prepare financial statements for each financial year. Under that law, the Directors have elected to prepare the financial statements in accordance with UK adopted international accounting standards. Under company law, the Directors must not approve the financial statements unless they are satisfied that they give a true and fair view of the state of affairs and profit or loss of the Company and Group for that period.

In preparing these Financial Statements, the Directors are required to:

·    select suitable accounting policies and then apply them consistently;

·    make judgements and accounting estimates that are reasonable and prudent;

·    state whether UK adopted international accounting standards have been followed, subject to any material departures disclosed and explained in the financial statements; and

·    prepare the financial statements on a going concern basis, unless it is inappropriate to presume that the Company will continue in business.

The Directors are responsible for keeping adequate accounting records that are sufficient to show and explain the Company’s transactions and disclose with reasonable accuracy at any time the financial position of the Group to enable them to ensure that the financial statements comply with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006. They are also responsible for safeguarding the assets of the Company and hence for taking reasonable steps for the prevention and detection of fraud and other irregularities.

The Directors are responsible for preparing the Annual Report in accordance with applicable law and regulations. The Directors consider the Annual Report and the financial statements, taken as a whole, provide the information necessary to assess the Group’s position, performance, business model and strategy and are fair, balanced and understandable.

The Directors are responsible for the maintenance and integrity of the corporate and financial information included on the Company’s website. Legislation in the United Kingdom governing the preparation and dissemination of financial statements may differ from legislation in other jurisdictions.

Directors’ responsibilities pursuant to DTR4

The Directors confirm to the best of their knowledge:

·    the financial statements have been prepared in accordance with UK adopted international accounting standards and give a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities, financial position and profit or loss of the Group; and

·    the management report includes a fair review of the development and performance of the business and the financial position of the Group, together with a description of the principal risks and uncertainties that they face.

Embed effective risk management, considering both opportunities and threats, throughout the organisation

The Directors are responsible for maintaining the Group’s systems of controls and risk management in order to safeguard its assets.

Risk is monitored and assessed by the Board who meet regularly and are responsible for ensuring that the financial performance of the Group is properly monitored and reported. This process includes reviews of annual and interim accounts, results announcements, internal control systems, procedures and accounting policies.

Subsequent events

Please see note 20 for details of the Group’s subsequent events.

Directors’ confirmation

So far as the directors are aware, there is no relevant audit information of which the Group’s auditors are unaware, and they have taken all steps that they ought to have taken as directors in order to make themselves aware of any relevant audit information and to establish that the Group’s auditors are aware of that information.

Auditors

The auditors, Crowe U.K LLP, have expressed their willingness to continue in office and a resolution to reappoint them will be proposed at the Annual General Meeting.

By Order of the Board

Cameron Pearce

Director
30 January 2024

Corporate Governance

The Group recognises the importance of, and is committed to, high standards of Corporate Governance.  Whilst the Group is not formally required to comply with the UK Corporate Governance Code 2018, the Group will try to observe, where practical, the requirements of the UK Corporate Governance Code 2018, as published by The Financial Reporting Council.

The Company intends to voluntarily observe the requirements of the UK Corporate Governance Code 2018, save as set out below. As at the date of the financial statements the Directors consider the Group to be in compliance with the UK Corporate Governance Code 2018 with the exception of the following:

·       The Company does not comply with the requirements of the UK Corporate Governance Code in relation to the requirement to have a senior independent director and the Audit Committee does not have three independent non-executive directors. The Nomination & Remuneration Committees also do not include independent directors.

·       Due to the current size of the company, and the early stages of the Project’s life cycle, the Company has not developed a formal diversity policy, and investment in and rewarding of the workforce. Furthermore, there have been no board evaluations conducted within the year.

·       All directors are not subject to annual re-election. Instead at least one third of the current directors are put forward for re-election at each annual general meeting, in accordance with the Company’s Articles of Association.

·       Remuneration for the non-executive directors includes share options. The awards are made in accordance with the Company’s remuneration policy.

·       The Board does not consider there to be a need for a formal succession plan at this stage, but this will be monitored as the size and complexity of the Company’s activities develop.

As at the date of the financial statements, the Board has a share dealing code that complies with the requirements of the Market Abuse Regulations. All persons discharging management responsibilities (comprising only the Directors at the date of this Document) shall comply with the share dealing code from the date of Admission.

Set below are Blencowe Resources Plc’s corporate governance practices for the year ended 30 September 2023.

Leadership

The Company is headed by an effective Board which is collectively responsible of the long term success of the Company.

The role of the Board – The Board sets the Company’s strategy, ensuring that the necessary resources are in place to achieve the agreed strategic priorities, and reviews management and financial performance. It is accountable to shareholders for the creation and delivery of strong, sustainable financial performance and long-term shareholder value. To achieve this, the Board directs and monitors the Company’s affairs within a framework of controls which enable risks for the future success of the business to be assessed and managed effectively. The Board also has responsibility for setting the Company’s core values and standards of business conduct and for ensuring that these, together with the Company’s obligations to its stakeholders, are widely understood throughout the Company. The Board has a formal schedule of matters reserved which is provided later in this report.

The Company aims to generate and preserve value over the long-term primarily through the development of its principal asset, the Orom-Cross Graphite project in the Republic of Uganda. The Company has previously completed a preliminary feasibility study on the project and is now in the process of completing a definitive feasibility study which will provide a risked and independent project valuation to international standards. The DFS process is rigorous and will result in an examination of all aspects of the project including economic viability, principal risks as well as engineering and geological matters.

 

Board Meetings – The core activities of the Board are carried out in scheduled meetings of the Board. These meetings are timed to link to key events in the Company’s corporate calendar and regular reviews of the business are conducted. Additional meetings and conference calls are arranged to consider matters which require decisions outside the scheduled meetings. During the year, the Board met on 10 occasions. Any concerns identified that cannot be resolved in these meetings will be documented in written form to the Chairman and recorded in the formal minutes of the Company.  In addition to the

Leadership (continued)

Board meetings linked to corporate transactions, the directors consider on an ad hoc, non-formal basis their effectiveness and relevance, and that of management.

Outside the scheduled meetings of the Board, the Directors maintain frequent contact with each other to discuss any issues of concern they may have relating to the Company or their areas of responsibility, and to keep them fully briefed on the Company’s operations.

Matters reserved specifically for Board – The Board has a formal schedule of matters reserved that can only be decided by the Board. The key matters reserved are the consideration and approval of:

·      the Group’s overall strategy;

·      financial statements and dividend policy;

·      management structure including succession planning, appointments and remuneration;

·      material acquisitions and disposal, material contracts, major capital expenditure projects and budgets;

·      capital structure, debt and equity financing and other matters;

·      risk management and internal controls;

·      the Group’s corporate governance and compliance arrangements; and

·      corporate policies

Summary of the Board’s work in the financial year – During the year, the Board considered all relevant matters within its remit, but focused in particular on exploration and development of the Orom-Cross Graphite Project.

Attendance at meetings:

Member

Meeting attended

Cameron Pearce

Executive Chairman

9

Sam Quinn

Non-Executive Director

10

Alexander Passmore

Non-Executive Director

10

The Board is pleased with the level of attendance and participation of Directors at Board and committee meetings.

The Chairman, Cameron Pearce, sets the Board Agenda and ensures adequate time for discussion.

Non-executive Directors – The non-executive Directors bring a broad range of business and commercial experience to the Company and have a particular responsibility to challenge independently and constructively the performance of the Executive management (where appointed) and to monitor the performance of the management team in the delivery of the agreed objectives and targets.

Non-executive Directors – Are initially appointed for a term of three years, which may, subject to satisfactory performance and re-election by shareholders, be extended by mutual agreement.

Other governance matters – All of the Directors are aware that independent professional advice is available to each Director in order to properly discharge their duties as a Director. In addition, each Director and Board committee has access to the advice of the Company Secretary.

The Company Secretary – The Company Secretary is FIM Secretaries Limited which is retained on a consultancy basis. FIM Secretaries Limited is available to Directors and advises the Board on UK compliance matters.

Effectiveness

For the period under review the Board comprised of an Executive Chairman and two non-executive Directors.

The Directors are of the view that the Board and its committees consist of Directors with an appropriate balance of skills, experience, independence and diverse backgrounds to enable them to discharge their duties and responsibilities effectively.

The Board believes it has the correct balance of skills, reflecting a broad range of commercial and professional skills across geographies and relevant industries that is necessary to ensure the Company is equipped to deliver its investment objective. Additionally, each Director has experience in public markets.

The Directors and their roles and key personnel are displayed on the Company’s website: Management & Directors – Blencowe Resources (blencoweresourcesplc.com)

Independence – None of the Directors are considered to be independent, as they have shareholdings in the Company as noted on page 11.  It is intended that additional Directors will be appointed in future and that independence will be one of the key factors considered at that time. As at the date of this Report no prospective Directors have been identified and no arrangements exist (formal or informal) for the appointment of any other Director.

Appointments – The Board is responsible for reviewing and the structure, size and composition of the Board and making recommendations to the Board with regards to any required changes. The Non-executive directors informally scrutinise and hold to account the performance of management and the Executive Chairman, there are no other Executives on the Board. The Board are satisfied with the current size and composition of the Board and management.

Commitments – All Directors have disclosed any significant commitments to the Board and confirmed that they have sufficient time to discharge their duties.

Induction – All new Directors received an induction as soon as practical on joining the Board.

Conflict of interest – A Director has a duty to avoid a situation in which he or she has, or can have, a direct or indirect interest that conflicts, or possibly may conflict with the interests of the Company. The Board had satisfied itself that there is no compromise to the independence of those Directors who have appointments on the Boards of, or relationships with, companies outside the Company. The Board requires Directors to declare all appointments and other situations which could result in a possible conflict of interest.

Accountability

The Board is committed to provide shareholders with a clear assessment of the Group’s position and prospects. This is achieved through this report and as required other periodic financial and trading statements.

Going concern – As part of their going concern assessment set out in note 2.3, the Board of Directors have reviewed cash flow forecasts reviewed for the 12 months from the date these financial statements were signed and considered the medium term outlook through to December 2025 as described in the Viability Statement. The Directors have a reasonable expectation that the Group will be able to continue in operation and meet its liabilities as they fall due over the period to December 2025 provided further funding can be raised as required. Due to the requirement to raise additional funding, a material uncertainty with regard to going concern has been disclosed at note 2.3.

Risk is monitored and assessed by the Board as a whole and are responsible for ensuring that the financial performance of the Company is properly monitored and reported. This process includes reviews of annual and interim accounts, results announcements, internal control systems, procedures and accounting policies. Risk management is carried out by the Board of Directors. The Board identifies and evaluates financial risks, and the key risk factors for the Company are contained in the Financial Statements for the year ended 30 September 2023.

Internal controls – The Board of Directors reviews the effectiveness of the Company’s system of internal controls in line with the requirement of the Code. The internal control system is designed to manage the risk of failure to achieve its business objectives. This covers internal financial and operational controls, compliance and risk management.  Key controls consist of segregation of duties, authorisation and approval policies and accounting controls such as monthly reconciliations. The Directors consider the Company has appropriate and effective internal controls in place for the year under review and up to the date of approval of the Annual Report and Financial Statements. The Directors acknowledge their responsibility for the Company’s system of internal controls and for reviewing its effectiveness. Risk is monitored, assessed and managed by the Board as a whole who are responsible for ensuring that the financial performance of the Company is properly monitored and reported. This process includes reviews of annual and interim accounts, results announcements, internal control systems, procedures and accounting policies. The finance function is outsourced to FIM Capital Limited and details of the duties performed are in a formal agreement. The Board confirms the need for an ongoing process for identification, evaluation and management of significant risks faced by the Company. The Directors carry out a risk assessment before signing up to any commitments.

The Audit Committee

The Audit Committee comprises of Cameron Pearce, chairman of the committee, and Alex Passmore and aims to meet at least twice a year and is responsible for ensuring that the Group’s financial performance is properly monitored, controlled and reported to the Board. During the year of review, the Audit Committee met twice. The Audit Committee is responsible for the scope and effectiveness of the external audit and compliance by the Group with statutory and other regulatory requirements. Given the size of the Group and the relative simplicity of the systems, the Board considers that there is no current requirement for an internal audit function. The procedures that have been established to provide internal financial control are considered appropriate for a Group of its size and include controls over expenditure, regular reconciliations and management accounts.

The Group has no internal audit function at present, as it is not considered necessary given the current size and operations of the entity. This will be kept under review as the nature of operations becomes more complex with the planned development of the project.

The Audit Committee monitors in discussion with the auditors:

·      the integrity of the financial statements of the Group and significant financial reporting judgments contained in them, such as the assessment of impairment to the Group’s intangible assets.

·      any formal announcements relating to the Group’s financial performance

·      the Group’s internal financial controls and risk management systems

·      the external auditor’s independence and objectivity and the effectiveness of the audit process, taking into consideration relevant UK professional and regulatory requirements.

The Directors are responsible for taking such steps as are reasonably available to them to safeguard the assets of the Company and to prevent and detect fraud and other irregularities.

External auditor’s independence

Since the last tender which was conducted in 2018, Crowe U.K LLP has acted as independent auditor for six years. Crowe U.K LLP has completed mandatory partner rotation this year in accordance with their firm’s policy. The Audit Committee have held discussions with the external auditors to confirm there are no non-audit services provided, and no other independence considerations they should be aware of.

Remuneration and Nominations Committee

A Remuneration and Nominations Committee was established during 2020 and is made up of the two non-executive directors. The Committee comprises Sam Quinn, chairman of the committee, and Alex Passmore. They are not considered to be independent directors. The Board considers the committee composition of two directors to be sufficient due to the size of the company at this time. The Remuneration and Nomination Committee meets at least annually and is responsible for setting the remuneration policy for all executive directors and the Company’s chairman, including any compensation payments; recommends and monitors the level and structure of remuneration for senior management; evaluates the board of directors and examines the skills and characteristics required of board candidates. During the year of review, the Remuneration and Nomination Committee met once.

Remuneration paid to Directors in the period under review is disclosed in the Directors’ Remuneration Report.

The Committee is dedicated to implementing a remuneration policy that promotes long-term incentives and aligns the interests of directors with those of shareholders. Share and option awards should be phased, contain performance milestones where appropriate and encourage long term participation.

The Committee considers  in defining the remuneration policy that arrangements should be clear and transparent, should avoid undue complexity, and should be proportional to the services provided in delivering the Company’s strategy and purpose.

The Remuneration Committee to date has focused on share options and bonus payments as the main incentives for executives, given the stage of development of the Company and to further align senior management with shareholder interests. Typically share options are subject to vesting conditions, such as completion of feasibility studies or the introduction of strategic partners. In addition share price hurdles have been used to provide further shareholder alignment. Given the nature of the Company as the developer of a mining project and the potential for rerating of the Company’s value as the project advances, having a direct equity exposure is deemed to be the most desirable form of management incentive. In addition, cash bonus payments are generally kept to a minimum to preserve the Company’s capital. Share options will typically expire three months following the cessation of employment.

In accordance with the Company’s Articles of Association, at every annual general meeting at least one third of the current directors who are subject to retirement by rotation will be put forward to retire.

Shareholder relations

Communication and dialogue – Open and transparent communication with shareholders is given high priority and there is regular dialogue with institutional investors, as well as general presentations made at the time of the release of the annual and interim financial results. All Directors are kept aware of changes in major shareholdings in the Company and are available to meet with shareholders who have specific interests or concerns. The Company issues its results promptly to the market via RNS and also publishes them on the Company’s website: www.blencoweresourcesplc.com. Regular market news updates are made in relation to the Company including the status of its exploration and development programme which is also included on the Company’s website. Shareholders and other interested parties can subscribe to receive news updates by email by registering online on the website free of charge.

The Directors are available to meet with institutional shareholders to discuss any issues and gain an understanding of the Company’s business, its strategies and governance. Meetings are also held with the corporate governance representatives of institutional investors when requested.

Annual General Meeting – At every AGM individual shareholders are given the opportunity to put questions to the Chairman and to other members of the Board that may be present. Notice of the AGM is sent to shareholders at least 21 working days before the meeting. Details of proxy votes for and against each resolution, together with the votes withheld are announced to the London Stock Exchange and are published on the Company’s website as soon as practical after the meeting.

Viability statement

 

In accordance with provision 31 of the UK Corporate Governance Code (2018), the Board has assessed the prospects of the Group over a two-year period, taking account of the Group’s current position and principal risks. For information regarding Group’s going concern position and funding requirements over the next twelve months, please see note 2.3.

 

Time frame

The Board believes that two years is currently the most appropriate time frame over which the Board should assess the long-term viability of the Group. The Group’s current activities do not generate any revenues or positive operating cash flow, and the completion of the Definitive Feasibility Study for the Orom-Cross Graphite Project will require further capital expenditures.

 

Assessing viability

The main assumption in the Board making its viability assessment is the ability of the Group to raise further funds in order to progress from the exploration phase into feasibility and eventually into production of revenues. The Group may not be able to obtain additional financing as and when needed which could result in a delay or indefinite postponement of exploration and development activities.

 

Principal risk

The Directors have carried out a robust assessment of the principal risks facing the Group as described on the preceding pages including those that threaten its business model, future performance, solvency or liquidity. The Directors are confident that they have put in place a strong management team with wide-ranging expertise in mineral exploration and development who are capable of dealing with the risk management in order to safeguard the Group’s assets. The directors are aware that the risks that could have the most adverse effect are funding and capital markets, potential other risks include the political risk in the country of business.

 

Based on the financial impact of the analysis outlined above and the associated risks, management actions and controls that are either in place or could be implemented, the Board has been able to conclude that the Company will be able to deliver the Orom-Cross Graphite Project.

 

Confirmation of viability

Taking account of these matters, the Directors have a reasonable expectation that the Group will be able to continue in operation and meet its liabilities as they fall due over the period to December 2025, assuming that the financing referred to above is completed as described. The Company’s going concern statement is detailed in note 2.3.

 

 

By Order of the Board

Cameron Pearce

Director
30 January 2024

Statement of Blencowe Plc’s policy on Directors’ Remuneration                  

The Directors’ Remuneration Report sets out the Company’s policy on the remuneration of Directors together with the details of Directors’ remuneration packages and services contracts for the year ended 30 September 2023.

As set out in the Company’s Prospectus dated 30 March 2020, each of the Directors may be paid a fee at such rate as may from time to time be determined by the Board. All the Directors are entitled to be reimbursed by the Company for travel, hotel and other expenses incurred by them in the course of their directors’ duties relating to the Company.

Any fees payable to the Directors after an Acquisition will be determined as part of the negotiations for the Acquisition, and will be dependent on whether the Directors remain on the board of the Company in any event.

There have been no changes to the Directors’ remuneration or remuneration policy since the publication of the Company’s Prospectus dated 30 March 2020 with the exception of those mentioned below. The terms and conditions of appointment for all the members of the Board are available for inspection at our registered office.

Terms of employment

Cameron Pearce was appointed on 8 June 2018 by the Company to act as a Non-Executive Director and Chairman of the Company. Following the Company’s readmission to the London Stock Exchange (“LSE”) on 28 April 2020, Mr Pearce was reappointed with fees of £96,000 per annum. If there is a change of control (as defined in the letter of appointment), Mr Pearce will be entitled to 100% of his annual fee as a lump sum payment if the Company terminates his employment, or if Mr Pearce chooses to terminate his appointment within 12 months following a change of control.

Sam Quinn was appointed on 8 June 2018 by the Company to act as a Non-Executive Director, Following the readmission of the Company to the LSE on 28 April 2020, Mr Quinn was engaged as a Non-Executive director with fees of £24,000 per annum.  If there is a change of control (as defined in the letter of appointment), Mr Quinn will be entitled to 100% of his annual fee as a lump sum payment if the Company terminates his employment, or if Mr Quinn chooses to terminate his appointment within 12 months following a change of control.

Alex Passmore was appointed on 8 June 2018 by the Company to act as a Non-Executive Director with fees of £12,000 per annum. On 15 March 2021, the Board agreed to increase Mr Passmore’s fees from 1 March 2021 to £18,000 per annum. If there is a change of control (as defined in the letter of appointment), Mr Passmore will be entitled to 100% of his annual fee as a lump sum payment if the Company terminates his employment, or if Mr Passmore chooses to terminate his appointment within 12 months following a change of control.

Remuneration Policy

Base salary levels will take into account market data for the relevant role, internal relativities, the individual’s experience and their current base salary. Where an individual is recruited below market norms, they may be re-aligned over time (e.g. two to three years), subject to performance in the role. Benefits will generally be in accordance with the approved policy. Currently, there are no benefits in place.

The Remuneration and Nomination Committee comprises Sam Quinn, who acts as chairman of the committee and Alex Passmore, and meets at least annually.  The Remuneration Committee reviews the scale and structure of the Directors’ fees, considering the interests of the shareholders and the performance of the Company and Directors. Bonuses, pay rises and the grant of long term incentives such as share options are linked to the achievement of key funding and project milestones that are set from time to time by the Committee.

The items included in this report are unaudited unless otherwise stated.

The Company maintains contact with its shareholders about remuneration in the same way as other matters and, as required by Section 439 of the Companies Act 2006, this remuneration report will be put to an advisory vote of the Company’s shareholders at the forthcoming Annual General Meeting

Directors’ emoluments and compensation (audited)

Set out below are the emoluments of the Directors:

Cameron Pearce

Sam Quinn

Alexander Passmore

Total

30 September 2022

Base fee

96,000

24,000

18,000

138,000

Bonuses

16,000

4,000

3,000

23,000

Share Based Payments

21,068

14,045

7,023

42,136

Total 30 September 2022

133,068

42,045

28,023

203,136

30 September 2023

Base fee

96,000

24,000

18,000

138,000

Share based payments

5,239

5,239

2,619

13,097

Total 30 September 2023

101,239

29,239

20,619

151,097

The percentage of directors’ emoluments of the total administrative costs for the year is 12% (2022: 30%). The directors’ base fees increased did not increase (2022: Nil) while the base salary costs of the key management employees did not increase (2022: 28%).

Statement of Directors’ shareholding and share interest (audited)

The Directors who served during the year ended 30 September 2023, and their interests at that date, are disclosed on page 11.

Issue of options

As at the reporting date, the number of shares options that the Company has issued to the Board and Senior Management are as follow;

Cameron Pearce (Chairman)

5,000,000

Mike Ralston (CEO)

5,500,000

Lionshead Consultants Ltd (Sam Quinn) (Non Exec Director)

3,750,000

Alexander Passmore (Non Exec Director)

1,750,000

Iain Wearing (COO)

5,000,000

For further information, please see notes 17 and 20.

Other matters

The Company does not currently have any annual or long-term incentive schemes (other than the one stated above) in place for any of the Directors and as such there are no disclosures in this respect.

The Company does not have any pension plans for any of the Directors and does not pay pension amounts in relation to their remuneration.

The Company has not paid out any excess retirement benefits to any Directors or past Directors. The Company has not paid any compensation to past Directors.

 

By Order of the Board

Sam Quinn

Director
30 January 2024

Independent Auditor’s Report to the Members of Blencowe Resources Plc

Opinion

We have audited the financial statements of Blencowe Resources Plc (the “Parent Company”) and its subsidiary (the ‘Group’) for the year ended 30 September 2023 which comprise the Consolidated statement of comprehensive income, Consolidated statement of financial position, Parent Company statement of financial position, Consolidated statement of changes in equity, Parent Company statement of changes in equity, Consolidated statement of cash flows, Parent Company statement of cash flows and notes to the financial statements, including significant accounting policies. The financial reporting framework that has been applied in the preparation of the Group and the Parent Company financial statements is applicable law and UK-adopted international accounting standards.

In our opinion:

·      the financial statements give a true and fair view of the state of the Group’s and of the Parent Company’s affairs as at 30 September 2023 and of the Group’s loss for the year then ended;

·      the Group and the Parent Company financial statements have been properly prepared in accordance with UK-adopted international accounting standards: and

·      the financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006.

Basis for opinion

We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (UK) (ISAs (UK)) and applicable law. Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements section of our report. We are independent of the Group and the Parent Company in accordance with the ethical requirements that are relevant to our audit of the financial statements in the UK, including the FRC’s Ethical Standard as applied to listed public interest entities, and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.

Material uncertainty in relation to going concern

We draw attention to note 2.3 to the financial statements, which explains that the Group and Parent Company’s ability to continue as a going concern is dependent on the availability on further fundraising. These conditions indicate the existence of a material uncertainty which may cast significant doubt over the Group’s and Parent Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Our opinion is not modified in respect of this matter.

In auditing the financial statements, we have concluded that the directors’ use of the going concern basis of accounting in the preparation of the financial statements is appropriate. We have highlighted going concern as a key audit matter due to the estimates and judgements the Directors are required to make in their going concern assessment, and their effect on our audit strategy. Our audit work in response to this key audit matter included:

·      We obtained the going concern assessment prepared by the directors, and performed a detailed review of the supporting cash flow forecasts. We challenged the key assumptions based on expected activity within the going concern period, and comparison to historical actual monthly expenditure.

·      We checked the mathematical accuracy of the projections and agreed the opening cash position to bank statements. We confirmed that the period of going concern assessment covered at least twelve months from the date of approval of the financial statements, and enquired regarding any matters shortly after this date that would impact the going concern consideration.

·      We reviewed the prior year going concern projections against the actual performance in the current financial year, in order to assess management’s ability to forecast accurately.

·      We assessed the systems and controls in place for the preparation of management’s going concern projections.

·      We reviewed the requirements of the grant awarded by the US Development Funding Council in September 2023 regarding works to be performed in order to receive each tranche of funding. We discussed with the directors how these were factored into budgets and exploration plans during the going concern assessment period.

·      We held discussions with the directors on how they plan to raise the additional funding required by the cash flow forecasts. This was considered against their previous success in fundraising for the project.

·      We reviewed the completeness of disclosures made in the financial statements in relation to going concern, and that these are in line with the going concern assessment provided to us by the directors.

Our responsibilities and the responsibilities of the directors with respect to going concern are described in the relevant sections of this report.

Overview of our audit approach

Materiality

In planning and performing our audit we applied the concept of materiality. An item is considered material if it could reasonably be expected to change the economic decisions of a user of the financial statements. We used the concept of materiality to both focus our testing and to evaluate the impact of misstatements identified.

Based on our professional judgement, we determined overall materiality for the financial statements as a whole to be £155,000 (2022 £140,000), based on 2% of total assets. Materiality for the parent company financial statements as a whole was set at £140,000 (2022: £120,000) based on 2% of total assets.

We use a different level of materiality (‘performance materiality’) to determine the extent of our testing for the audit of the financial statements.  Performance materiality is set based on the audit materiality as adjusted for the judgements made as to the entity risk and our evaluation of the specific risk of each audit area having regard to the internal control environment.  Performance materiality was set at 70% of materiality for the financial statements as a whole, which equates to £108,500 (2022: £98,000) for the Group and £98,000 (2022: £84,000) for the parent.

Where considered appropriate performance materiality may be reduced to a lower level, such as, for related party transactions and directors’ remuneration.

We agreed with the Audit Committee to report to it all identified errors in excess of £7,700 (2022: £7,000). Errors below that threshold would also be reported to it if, in our opinion as auditor, disclosure was required on qualitative grounds.

Overview of the scope of our audit

Our Group audit was scoped by obtaining an understanding of the Group and its environment, including the Group’s system of internal control, and assessing the risks of material misstatement in the financial statements. We also addressed the risk of management override of internal controls, including assessing whether there was evidence of bias by the Directors that may have represented a risk of material misstatement.

The Group operates through the Parent Company based in the United Kingdom whose main function is the incurring of administrative costs and providing funding to its exploration subsidiary in Uganda. The Parent Company, and its Ugandan subsidiary, were both considered to be a significant components.

In establishing our overall approach to the group audit, we determined the type of work that needed to be performed in respect of each component. As significant components, full scope audit were performed for both the Parent Company and the Ugandan subsidiary. All audit work was   carried out by the group audit team.

Given the Ugandan subsidiary is in the exploration stage of its work, we did not consider it necessary to visit Uganda. Documentation and explanations from Uganda were obtained by email and through telephone calls.

Key Audit Matters

Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgment, were of most significance in our audit of the financial statements of the current period and include the most significant assessed risks of material misstatement (whether or not due to fraud) we identified, including those which had the greatest effect on the overall audit strategy, the allocation of resources in the audit; and directing the efforts of the engagement team. These matters were addressed in the context of our audit of the financial statements as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, and we do not provide a separate opinion on these matters.

We set out below, together with the material uncertainty in relation to going concern above, those matters we considered to be key audit matters.

Key audit matter

How our scope addressed the key audit matter

1. Carrying value of intangible assets (note 9)

The Group carries intangible assets totalling £7.6m (2022: £6.6m) in relation to the Orom-Cross project in Uganda. These costs are capitalised in accordance with the requirements of IFRS 6.

At each reporting date, the directors are required to assess whether there are any indicators of impairment, that would require an impairment assessment to be carried out. The directors concluded there were no indicators of impairment.

The directors’ consideration of the impairment indicators requires them to make certain judgements, and may include certain estimates. These matters, together with the materiality of the exploration and evaluation assets make this a key audit matter.

 

We performed the following procedures as part of our audit of management’s assessment of the carrying value of intangible assets:

·      We obtained and reviewed the directors’ assessment of the indicators of impairment, as set out in IFRS 6 “Exploration for and evaluation of mineral resources”.

·      We assessed the design and implementation of controls over the impairment assessment process.

·      We obtained copies of all licenses held by the Group, and performed procedures to confirm the Group’s control of the licenses, that they remain valid, and to check there is an expectation that any exploration licenses that have expired will be renewed in the normal course of business.

·      We made specific enquiries of the directors and key staff involved in the exploration work, and reviewed budgets and forecasts to support the Group continuing with further exploration work in each of its license areas.

·      We considered the results of the bulk sampling works completed during the period, for any matters that may indicate impairment.

·      We reviewed the adequacy of disclosures in the financial statements in relation to the impairment consideration.

Based on our work performed, we consider the directors’ assessment, and the financial statements disclosures to be appropriate.

Our audit procedures in relation to these matters were designed in the context of our audit opinion as a whole. They were not designed to enable us to express an opinion on these matters individually and we express no such opinion.

Other information

The other information comprises the information included in the annual report other than the financial statements and our auditor’s report thereon. The directors are responsible for the other information contained within the annual report.

Our opinion on the financial statements does not cover the other information and, except to the extent otherwise explicitly stated in our report, we do not express any form of assurance conclusion thereon. Our responsibility is to read the other information and, in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the course of the audit, or otherwise appears to be materially misstated. If we identify such material inconsistencies or apparent material misstatements, we are required to determine whether this gives rise to a material misstatement in the financial statements themselves. If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude that there is a material misstatement of this other information, we are required to report that fact.

We have nothing to report in this regard.

 

Opinions on other matters prescribed by the Companies Act 2006

In our opinion the part of the directors’ remuneration report to be audited has been properly prepared in accordance with the Companies Act 2006.

In our opinion based on the work undertaken in the course of our audit:

·      the information given in the strategic report and the directors’ report for the financial year for which the financial statements are prepared is consistent with the financial statements; and

·      the directors’ report and strategic report have been prepared in accordance with applicable legal requirements.

Matters on which we are required to report by exception

In the light of the knowledge and understanding of the Group and the Parent Company and their environment obtained in the course of the audit, we have not identified material misstatements in the strategic report or the directors’ report.

We have nothing to report in respect of the following matters in relation to which the Companies Act 2006 requires us to report to you if, in our opinion:

·      adequate accounting records have not been kept by the company, or returns adequate for our audit have not been received from branches not visited by us; or

·      the company financial statements and the part of the directors’ remuneration report to be audited are not in agreement with the accounting records and returns; or

·      certain disclosures of directors’ remuneration specified by law are not made; or

·      we have not received all the information and explanations we require for our audit

Corporate governance statement

We have reviewed the directors’ statement in relation to going concern, longer-term viability and that part of the Corporate Governance Statement relating to the entity’s voluntary compliance with the provisions of the UK Corporate Governance Statement specified for our review.

Based on the work undertaken as part of our audit, we have concluded that each of the following elements of the Corporate Governance Statement is materially consistent with the financial statements and our knowledge obtained during the audit:

 

·      Directors’ statement with regards the appropriateness of adopting the going concern basis of accounting and any material uncertainties identified set out on page 17;

·      Directors’ explanation as to their assessment of the Group’s prospects, the period this assessment covers and why they period is appropriate set out on pages 19 and 20.

·      Directors’ statement on whether they have a reasonable expectation that the Group will be able to continue in operation and meets its liabilities set out on page 17;

·      Directors’ statement on fair, balanced and understandable set out on page 13;

·      Board’s confirmation that it has carried out a robust assessment of the emerging and principal risks set out on page 5;

·      Section of the annual report that describes the review of effectiveness of risk management and internal control systems set out on page 17; and

·      Section describing the work of the audit committee set out on page 18.

Responsibilities of the directors for the financial statements

As explained more fully in the directors’ responsibilities statement set out on page 13, the directors are responsible for the preparation of the financial statements and for being satisfied that they give a true and fair view, and for such internal control as the directors determine is necessary to enable the preparation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

In preparing the financial statements, the directors are responsible for assessing the Group’s and the Parent Company’s ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless the directors either intend to liquidate the Group or the Parent Company or to cease operations, or have no realistic alternative but to do so.

Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements

Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with ISAs (UK) will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these financial statements.

Irregularities, including fraud, are instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations. We design procedures in line with our responsibilities, outlined above, to detect material misstatements in respect of irregularities, including fraud. The extent to which our procedures are capable of detecting irregularities, including fraud is detailed below:

·      We obtained an understanding of the legal and regulatory frameworks that are applicable to the Group, and the procedures in place for ensuring compliance. The most significant regulations identified were the Companies Act 2006, listing rules of the London Stock Exchange and the requirements of the Group’s mining and exploration licenses. Our work included direct enquiry of the directors, who oversee all legal proceedings, reviewing Board minutes and inspection of correspondence.

·      We made enquiries of management, the Audit Committee and the Group’s external legal counsel in Uganda about any litigations and claims and compliance with local legislation in Uganda.

·      We communicated the relevant laws and regulations identified to all members of the engagement team, and remained alert to any indication of non-compliance with laws and regulations, or potential fraud, throughout our audit work.

·      As part of our audit planning process we assessed the different areas of the financial statements, including disclosures, for the risk of material misstatement. This included considering the risk of fraud where direct enquiries were made of management and those charged with governance concerning both whether they had any knowledge of actual or suspected fraud and their assessment of the susceptibility of fraud. We considered the risk was greater in areas that involve significant management estimate or judgement. Based on this assessment we designed audit procedures to focus on the key areas of estimation or judgement, this included risk-based testing of journal transactions using data analytic software, both at the year end and throughout the year.

Owing to the inherent limitations of an audit, there is an unavoidable risk that some material misstatements of the financial statements may not be detected, even though the audit is properly planned and performed in accordance with the ISAs (UK). The potential effects of inherent limitations are particularly significant in the case of misstatement resulting from fraud because fraud may involve sophisticated and carefully organized schemes designed to conceal it, including deliberate failure to record transactions, collusion or intentional misrepresentations being made to us.

A further description of our responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements is located on the Financial Reporting Council’s website at: www.frc.org.uk/auditorsresponsibilities. This description forms part of our auditor’s report.

Other matters which we are required to address

We were appointed by the board of Directors on 14 December 2018 to audit the financial statements for the period ending 30 September 2018. Our total uninterrupted period of engagement is six years, covering the periods ending 30 September 2018 to 30 September 2023.

The non-audit services prohibited by the FRC’s Ethical Standard were not provided to the Group or the Parent Company and we remain independent of the Group and the Parent Company in conducting our audit.

Our audit opinion is consistent with the additional report to the audit committee.

Use of our report

This report is made solely to the Parent Company’s members, as a body, in accordance with Chapter 3 of Part 16 of the Companies Act 2006. Our audit work has been undertaken so that we might state to the Parent Company’s members those matters we are required to state to them in an auditor’s report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, we do not accept or assume responsibility to anyone other than the Parent Company and the Parent Company’s members as a body, for our audit work, for this report, or for the opinions we have formed.

Nick Jones

Senior Statutory Auditor

For and on behalf of

Crowe U.K. LLP

Statutory Auditor

London, U.K.

 

Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income
for the year ended 30 September 2023

Notes

30 Sep 2023

30 Sep 2022

GBP

GBP

Exploration costs

(53,347)

(4,853)

Impairment – Akelikongo project

9

(404,533)

Administrative fees and other expenses

5

(1,298,872)

(681,488)

Adjustments to surface liability

15

51,316

Operating loss

(1,352,219)

(1,039,558)

Finance costs

15

(45,748)

(45,916)

Loss before tax

(1,397,967)

(1,085,474)

Taxation

8

Loss for the year attributable to owners of the parent

(1,397,967)

(1,085,474)

Other comprehensive income

Items that may be reclassified to profit or loss:

Exchange differences on translation of foreign operation:

31,282

(4,205)

Other comprehensive income/(loss), net of tax

31,282

(4,205)

Total comprehensive loss attributable to owners of the parent

(1,366,685)

(1,089,679)

Basic and diluted loss per share (pence)

10

(0.70)

(0.68)

 

           Consolidated Statement of Financial Position as at 30 September 2023

Notes

30 Sep 2023

30 Sep 2022

GBP

GBP

Non-Current Assets

Intangible assets

9

7,604,564

6,615,253

Current assets

Trade and other receivables

13

31,863

85,847

Cash and cash equivalents

129,853

346,994

Total current assets

161,716

432,841

Total assets

7,766,280

7,048,094

Current liabilities

Creditors: Amounts falling due within one year

14

(1,076,169)

(326,375)

Total current liabilities

(1,076,169)

(326,375)

Non-current liabilities

Surface liabilities

15

(818,915)

(823,852)

Total liabilities

(1,895,084)

(1,150,227)

Net assets

5,871,196

5,897,867

Equity

Share capital

16

1,338,566

1,181,316

Share premium

16

8,637,399

7,480,829

Share options reserve

428,342

402,148

Translation reserve

2.9

30,739

(543)

Accumulated losses

(4,563,850)

(3,165,883)

Total equity

5,871,196

5,897,867

 

These financial statements were approved by the Board of Directors and authorised for issue on 30 January 2024 and signed on its behalf by:

Cameron Pearce                                  Sam Quinn

Director                                                           Director

                                                                                                         

Parent Statement of Financial Position as at 30 September 2023

 

 

Notes

30 Sep 23

30 Sep 22

 

GBP

GBP  

 

Fixed assets

 

Investment in subsidiaries

11

6,027,940

4,892,924

Non-current assets

671,905

521,944

Total fixed assets

 

6,699,845

5,414,868

 

Current assets

 

Trade and other receivables

13

342,197

315,030

Cash and cash equivalents

129,853

346,994

Total current assets

472,050

662,024

 

Total assets

 

7,171,895

6,076,892

 

Current liabilities

 

Creditors: Amounts falling due within one year

14

(567,867)

(159,530)

Total current liabilities

 

(567,867)

(159,530)

 

 

Net assets

6,604,028

5,917,362

 

Equity

 

Share capital

16

1,338,566

1,181,316

Share premium

16

8,637,399

7,480,829

Share options reserve

428,342

402,148

Accumulated losses   

(3,800,279)

(3,146,931)

Total equity

6,604,028

5,917,362

 

The Company has taken advantage of the exemption allowed under section 408 of the Companies Act 2006 and has not presented its own Statement of Comprehensive Income in these financial statements. The loss after tax of the parent Company for the year was £653,348 (2022: £1,178,756).

The Financial Statements were approved and authorised for issue by the Board of Directors on 30 January 2024 and were signed on its behalf by:

                 

                                                                                  

 

Cameron Pearce                                  Sam Quinn

Director                                                           Director

Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity for the year ended 30 September 2023

Share

 capital

Share premium

Share option reserve

Accumulated losses

Translation reserve

Total equity

GBP

GBP

GBP

GBP

GBP

GBP

Balance as at 30 Sep 2021

901,316

5,132,081

317,876

(2,080,409)

3,662

4,274,526

Loss for the year

(1,085,474)

(1,085,474)

Exchange differences on translation of foreign operations

(4,205)

(4,205)

Total comprehensive loss

(1,085,474)

(4,205)

(1,089,679)

Transactions with owners

New shares issued (note 16)

280,000

2,520,000

2,800,000

Share issue costs

(171,252)

(171,252)

Share based payment charge

84,272

84,272

Total transactions with owners

280,000

2,348,748

84,272

2,713,020

Balance as at 30 Sep 2022

1,181,316

7,480,829

402,148

(3,165,883)

(543)

5,897,867

Loss for the year

(1,397,967)

(1,397,967)

Exchange differences on translation of foreign operations

31,282

31,282

Total comprehensive loss

(1,397,967)

31,282

(1,366,685)

Transactions with owners

New shares issued (note 16)

157,250

1,227,750

1,385,000

Share issue costs

(71,180)

(71,180)

Share based payment charge

26,194

26,194

Total transactions with owners

157,250

1,156,570

26,194

1,340,014

Balance as at 30 Sep 2023

1,338,566

8,637,399

428,342

(4,563,850)

30,739

5,871,196

Parent Statement of Changes in Equity for the year ended 30 September 2023

Share

 capital

Share premium

Share option reserve

Accumulated losses

Total equity

GBP

GBP

GBP

GBP

GBP

Balance as at 30 Sep 2021

901,316

5,132,081

317,876

(1,968,175)

4,383,098

Loss for the year

(1,178,756)

(1,178,756)

Total comprehensive loss

(1,178,756)

(1,178,756)

Total transactions with owners

New shares issued (note 16)

280,000

2,520,000

2,800,000

Share issue costs

(171,252)

(171,252)

Share based payment charge

84,272

84,272

Total transactions with owners

280,000

2,348,748

84,272

2,713,020

Balance as at 30 Sep 2022

1,181,316

7,480,829

402,148

(3,146,931)

5,917,362

Loss for the year

(653,348)

(653,348)

Total comprehensive loss

(653,348)

(653,348)

Total transactions with owners

New shares issued (note 16)

157,250

1,227,750

1,385,000

Share issues costs

(71,180)

(71,180)

Share based payment charge

26,194

26,194

Total transactions with owners

157,250

1,156,570

26,194

1,340,014

Balance as at 30 Sep 2023

1,338,566

8,637,399

428,342

(3,800,279)

6,604,028

Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the year ended 30 September 2023

Notes

30 Sep 2023

30 Sep 2022

GBP

GBP

Operating activities

Loss after tax

(1,397,967)

(1,085,474)

Finance costs

45,748

45,916

Adjustment to surface liability

15

(51,316)

Share based payment

17

26,194

84,272

Impairment – Akelikongo costs

9

404,533

Unrealised currency translation

182,264

(208,371)

Changes in working capital

Decrease/(increase) in trade and other receivables

53,984

(33,267)

Increase in trade and other payables

272,664

76,483

Net cash flows utilised by operating activities

(817,113)

(767,224)

Cash flows from investing activities

Investment in exploration assets

9

(713,848)

(1,423,236)

Net cash flows utilised by investing activities

(713,848)

(1,423,236)

Cash flows from financing activities

Shares issued (net of issue cost)

16

1,313,820

2,444,166

Net cash flows from financing activities

1,313,820

2,444,166

(Decrease)/increase in cash and cash equivalents

(217,141)

253,706

Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year

346,994

93,288

Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year

129,853

346,994

Net Debt note

Cash at bank

and in hand

Surface

Liability

Total

GBP

GBP

GBP

At 1 October 2021

93,288

(887,560)

(794,272)

Cash flows

253,706

253,706

Other non-cash changes

(90,695)

(90,695)

As 30 September 2022

346,994

(978,255)

(631,261)

As 30 September 2022

346,994

(978,255)

(631,261)

Cash flows

(217,141)

(217,141)

Other non-cash changes

159,340

159,340

As 30 September 2023

129,853

(818,915)

(689,062)

 

Parent Statement of Cash Flows for the year ended 30 September 2023

30 Sep 2023

30 Sep 2022

Notes

GBP

GBP

Operating activities

Loss after tax

(653,348)

(1,178,756)

Less finance income

(55,873)

(24,354)

Increase in bad debt provision

12,13

11,742

9,408

Share based payment

17

26,194

84,272

Changes in working capital

Increase in trade and other receivables

(27,167)

(120,783)

(Decrease)/increase in trade and other payables

(58,641)

64,002

Net cash flows from operating activities

(757,093)

(1,166,211)

Cash flows from investing activities

Loan advanced to subsidiary

(105,828)

(68,278)

Investment in subsidiary, relating to exploration costs paid

11

(668,040)

(955,971)

Net cash flows from investing activities

(773,868)

(1,024,249)

 

Cash flows from financing activities

Shares issued (net of issue cost)

16

1,313,820

2,444,166

Net cash flows from financing activities

1,313,820

2,444,166

Increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

(217,141)

253,706

Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year

346,994

93,288

Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year

129,853

346,994

1.   General

Blencowe Resources Plc (the “Company”) is a public limited company incorporated and registered in England and Wales on 18 September 2017 with registered company number 10966847 and its registered office is situated in England and Wales at 167-169 Great Portland Street, Fifth Floor London, W1W 5PF.

The Group did not earn any trading income during the year under review but incurred expenditure associated with financing and operation of the Group and developing its principal assets.

2.   Accounting Policies

2.1     Basis of preparation

The principal accounting policies applied in the preparation of the Company and Group’s Financial Statements are set out below. These policies have been consistently applied to the periods presented, unless otherwise stated.

The Company and Group’s Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with UK adopted international accounting standards (“IFRS”). The Company Financial Statements have been prepared using the measurement bases specified by IFRS for each type of asset, liability, income and expense.

The Group’s Financial Statements are presented in GBP, which is the Company’s functional currency. All amounts have been rounded to the nearest pound, unless otherwise stated.

2.2     Basis of consolidation

The Consolidated Financial Statements comprise the financial statements of the Company and its subsidiary Consolidated African Resources Limited (“CARU”) ) (formerly Blencowe Resources Uganda Ltd (“BRUL”).

Subsidiaries are fully consolidated from the date of acquisition, being the date on which the Group obtains control.  Control is achieved when the Group is exposed, or has rights, to variable returns from its involvement with the investee and has the ability to affect those returns through its power over an investee, including:

•           the contractual arrangement with the other vote holders of the investee;

•           rights arising from other contractual arrangements; and

•           the Group’s voting rights and potential voting rights

The Group re-assesses whether or not it controls an investee if facts and circumstances indicate that there are changes to one or more of the three elements of control. Subsidiaries are fully consolidated from the date on which control is transferred to the Group. They are deconsolidated from the date that control ceases. Assets, liabilities, income and expenses of a subsidiary acquired or disposed of during the period are included in the Group Financial Statements from the date the Group gains control until the date the Group ceases to control the subsidiary.

All intra-group balances, transactions, income and expenses and profits and losses resulting from intra-group transactions that are recognised, are eliminated in full.

2.3     Going concern

At 30 September 2023, the Group had £7,766,280 of total assets (2022: £7,048,094), of which £129,853 are held as cash and cash equivalents (2022: £346,994).

In making an assessment of going concern for the Group and Company, the Board of Directors have reviewed cash flow forecasts covering a period of 12 months from the date these financial statements were approved, and have concluded that it is appropriate to prepare the financial statements on a going concern basis.

The Group has successfully been granted a $5 million grant through the US Development Finance Corporation (DFC). This funding will be provided in a number of tranches aligned to completion of works related to the Definitive Feasibility Study. The DFC grant will not cover the entirety of the DFS costs and hence additional funding will be required during the going concern period. These conditions are considered to indicate the existence of a material uncertainty, which may cast doubt over the Group’s and Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include adjustments that would arise in the event of the Group and Company not being a going concern.

2.4     Changes in significant accounting policies

The Group has adopted all new IFRS and amendments to IFRS applicable for this period. There has been no change to the Group’s accounting policies as a result, and no other significant impact to the financial statements.

2.5     Standards, amendments and interpretations to published standards not yet effective

The Directors have reviewed the IFRS standards in issue which are effective for annual accounting years ending on or after the stated effective date. In their view, none of these standards would have a material impact on the financial statements of the Group.

2.6     Intangible assets

Exploration and evaluation assets

The Group recognises expenditure as exploration and evaluation assets when it determines that those assets will be successful in finding specific mineral resources. Expenditure included in the initial measurements of exploration and evaluation assets and which are classified as intangible assets relate to the acquisition of rights to explore, exploratory drilling, sampling and activities to evaluate the technical feasibility and commercial viability of extracting a mineral resource. Capitalisation of pre-production expenditure ceases when the mining property is capable of commercial production.

Impairment

Exploration and evaluation assets are not subject to amortisation until production commences but are assessed for impairment when an event or trigger requires an assessment to be carried out. The assessment is carried out by allocating exploration and evaluation assets to cash generating units (“CGU’s”), which are based on specific projects or geographical areas. Currently there is only one CGU relating to the Orom-Cross Project. Whenever the exploration for and evaluation of mineral resources in cash generating units does not lead to the discovery of commercially viable quantities of mineral resources and the Group has decided to discontinue such activities of that unit, the associated expenditures are written off to the Statement of Comprehensive Income.

Exploration and evaluation assets recorded at fair-value on acquisition

Exploration assets which are acquired are recognised at fair value. When an entity is acquired whose only significant assets are its exploration asset and/or rights to explore, the Directors consider that the fair value of the exploration assets is equal to the consideration.

2.7     Financial instruments

A financial instrument is any contract that gives rise to a financial asset of one entity and a financial liability or equity instrument of another.

(i)       Financial assets

Financial assets are classified at initial recognition. The classification of financial assets at initial recognition that are debt instruments depends on the financial asset’s contractual cash flow characteristics and the Group’s business model for managing them. The Group initially measures a financial asset at its fair value plus, in the case of a financial asset not at fair value through profit or loss, transaction costs.

In order for a financial asset to be classified and measured at amortised cost, it needs to give rise to cash flows that are ‘solely payments of principal and interest (SPPI)’ on the principal amount outstanding. This assessment is referred to as the SPPI test and is performed at an instrument level.

Classification and measurement is based on both whether contractual cash flows are solely payments of principal and interest; and whether the debt instrument is held to collect those cash flows. In the case of the Group, all financial assets meet this criteria and they are held at amortised cost.

Impairment of financial assets

IFRS 9’s impairment requirements use more forward-looking information to recognise expected credit losses – the ECL model.

ECLs are based on the difference between the contractual cash flows due in accordance with the contract and all the cash flows that the Company expects to receive, discounted at the original effective interest rate. The expected cash flows will include cash flows from the sale of collateral held or other credit enhancements that are integral to the contractual terms.

ECLs are recognised in two stages. For credit exposures for which there has not been a significant increase in credit risk since initial recognition, ECLs are provided for credit losses that result from default events that are possible within the next 12 months (a ’12-month ECL’). For those credit exposures for which there has been a significant increase in credit risk since initial recognition, a loss allowance is required for credit losses expected over the remaining life of the exposure, irrespective of the timing of the default (a ‘lifetime ECL’).

For the Company’s receivables from its subsidiary, management have assessed there to be no significant change in credit risk and have assessed a 12 month ECL at 5% to be appropriate for the current year. Therefore, the Company does not track changes in credit risk, but instead recognises a loss allowance based on lifetime ECLs at each reporting date.

(ii)      Financial liabilities

Financial liabilities are classified, at initial recognition, as financial liabilities at amortised cost. The Group’s financial liabilities include trade and other payables and surface liabilities.

Subsequent measurements

Surface liabilities and trade and other payables.

After initial recognition, surface liabilities and trade and other payables are subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective interest rate method. Gains and losses are recognised in the statement of profit or loss when the liabilities are derecognised, as well as through the effective interest rate amortisation process.

Amortised cost is calculated by taking into account any discount or premium on acquisition and fees or costs that are an integral part of the effective interest rate. The effective interest rate amortisation is included as finance costs in the statement of profit or loss.

Derecognition

A financial liability is derecognised when the associated obligation is discharged or cancelled or expires.

When an existing financial liability is replaced by another from the same lender on substantially different terms, or the terms of an existing liability are substantially modified, such an exchange or modification is treated as the derecognition of the original liability and the recognition of a new liability. The difference in the respective carrying amounts is recognised in profit or loss.

2.8     Share capital

Ordinary shares are classified as equity. Incremental costs directly attributable to the issue of new shares or options are shown in equity as a deduction, net of tax, from proceeds.

Warrants

Warrant options are classified as equity.  The fair value of the warrants has been calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model.  For more information, please see note 17.

Share options

The Group accounts for the equity-settled share options it has issued in accordance with IFRS 2. The share options are recognised at their fair value at the date of grant. The total share based payment charge expensed is recognised over the vesting period, which is the period over which performance conditions are to be satisfied. The fair value is calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, adjusted for the probability of meeting market based vesting conditions where these are included.  The inputs used in the model are based on management’s best estimate.

No expense is recognised for options that do not ultimately vest, except for awards where vesting is conditional on a market condition or non-vesting condition, which are treated as vesting irrespective of whether or not the market or non-vesting condition is satisfied, provided all other performance or service conditions are satisfied.

2.9     Foreign currency translation

(i)    Functional and presentation currency

Items included in the financial statements of each of the group’s entities are measured using the currency of the primary economic environment in which the entity operates (‘the functional currency’). The consolidated financial statements are presented in Great British Pounds currency (GBP).

(ii)   Transactions and balances

Foreign currency transactions are translated into the functional currency using the exchange rates at the dates of the transactions. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies at the reporting date are retranslated to the functional currency at the exchange rate at that date.  Foreign exchange gains and losses resulting from the settlement of such transactions, and from the translation of monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies at year end exchange rates, are generally recognised in profit or loss.

Non-monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies that are measured at fair value are retranslated to the functional currency at the exchange rate at the date that the fair value was determined. Non-monetary items in a foreign currency that are measured in terms of historical cost are translated using the exchange rate at the date of the transaction.   Foreign currency differences arising on the consolidation of the Group’s companies are accumulated in the translation reserve.  The Company’s only subsidiary is Blencowe Resources Uganda Limited, whose functional currency is USD

2.10   Earnings per share

The Company presents basic and, when appropriate, diluted earnings per share (“EPS”) data for its Ordinary Shares. Basic EPS is calculated by dividing the profit or loss attributable to ordinary shareholders of the Company by the weighted average number of Ordinary Shares outstanding during the year. Diluted EPS is calculated by adjusting the earnings and number of shares for the effects of dilutive potential Ordinary Shares.

2.11   Income tax

Income tax expense comprises current tax and deferred tax.

Current income tax

A 19% rate of corporate income tax applies to the Company. From 1 April 2023 the main corporation tax increased from 19% to 25%, and a new 19% small profits rate of corporation tax was introduced for companies whose profits do not exceed £50,000.

Deferred income tax

Deferred tax is recognised in profit or loss except to the extent that it relates to a business combination, or items recognised directly in equity or in other comprehensive income. Deferred income tax is recognised on temporary differences arising between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts in the Financial Statements. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are measured on an undiscounted basis at the tax rates that are expected to apply to the period when the related asset is realised or the liability is settled, based on tax rates (and tax laws) that have been enacted or substantively enacted at the date of the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position.

2.12   Investment in subsidiary

Investments in subsidiary are done at cost less impairment, with the investment balance being added to the exploration costs paid on behalf of the subsidiary.

2.13   Cash and cash equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents in the Company and Group statements of financial position comprise bank balances only.

3.   Critical accounting estimates and judgments

In preparing the Company and Group Financial Statements, the Directors are required to make judgements, estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported. These estimates and judgements are continually reviewed and are based on experience and other factors, including expectations of future events that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances.

Accounting estimates and assumptions are made concerning the future and, by their nature, may not

accurately reflect the related actual outcome. There are no key assumptions and other sources of estimation uncertainty that have a significant risk of causing a material adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities within the next financial year.

Critical accounting estimates

Interest charge on amounts falling after one year

At year end, the NPV of the liability for surface rights  to the owners of the land was £818,915 (2022: £978,255). Interest is charged on the liabilities at a rate of 5%, if the discount rate used to calculate the present value of the liabilities was to increase by 1%, the carrying value of the surface rights liability would increase by around £34,506 (2022: £60,000). The interest charged during the year was for the surface rights was £45,748 (2022: £45,916), if the rate was increased by 1% then the interest charge would increase by approximately £6,235 (2022: £5,000). For further information on the lease, please see note 15.

Critical accounting judgements

Impairment of intangible assets – exploration and evaluation costs

IFRS 6 requires entities recognising exploration and evaluation assets to perform an impairment test on those assets when specific facts and circumstances indicate an impairment test is required. The assessment involves judgement as to the status of licenses and the likelihood of renewal of exploration licenses which expire in the near future. The directors also make a judgement on the ability to meet license obligations, budgets and plans for future exploration activity, the results of that exploration activity, and to assess the recoverability of the capitalised exploration and evaluation costs on development of the project.

Going concern

In their assessment of going concern, the Directors have prepared cash flow forecast showing the Groups’ expected future expenditure. The Directors were required to make estimated and judgements over future cash flows and funding. For further information about the Group’s going concern, please see note 2.3.

4.   Operating Segment activities

The Group is engaged in the business of mining. At this stage in the Group’s development, the Group is focusing on financing and continued development of the Orom-Cross Graphite Project in Uganda. This is considered to be the only operating segment.

5.   Administrative fees and other expenses

30 Sep 2023

30 Sep 2022

GBP

GBP

Directors’ remuneration (see note 6)

140,051

163,770

Professional fees

           226,471

274,333

Salaries (see note 7)

150,000

142,500

Listing fees

41,123

26,910

Audit fees

35,000

29,000

Share option/warrant cost (see note 17)

26,194

84,272

Administration fees

47,000

47,000

Broker fees

41,000

38,048

Travelling expenses

16,852

34,167

Ugandan taxes (note 8)

392,425

Miscellaneous fees

72,625

40,505

Foreign currency (gain)/loss

110,131

(199,017)

Total

1,298,872

681,488

Key management remuneration, together with any share-based payments, are disclosed in note 7.

6.   Directors’ remuneration

30 Sep 2023

30 Sep 2022

GBP

GBP

Base fees

138,000

138,000

Employer NI

2,051

2,770

Bonuses

23,000

Share based payments

13,097

42,136

Total

153,148

205,906

In addition, the Directors received options which are disclosed in note 17.

7.   Key management personnel

The number of key management (excluding members the Board) employees throughout the year was as follows;

30 Sep 2023

30 Sep 2022

By the Company

2

2

By the Group

2

2

The key management employees who served during the year, together with details of their interest in the shares of the Company as at the reporting date were:

Number of shares

Value of the shares

Michael Ralston – CEO

3,225,000

£188,950

Iain Wearing – COO

408,333

£22,500

The total base salary costs recognised as an expense for the year was £150,000 (2022: £142,500). A further £90,000 (2022: £75,000) was capitalised as they are related to the Orom-Cross Graphite Project. Total share-based payments for the year were £13,097 (2022: £42,136). There was no other component of compensation.

8.   Taxation

A 19% rate of corporate income tax applies to the Company. From 1 April 2023 the main corporation tax increased from 19% to 25%, and a new 19% small profits rate of corporation tax was introduced for companies whose profits do not exceed £50,000.

Analysis of charge in the year

30 Sep 2023

30 Sep 2022

GBP

GBP

Current tax:

UK Corporation tax on loss for the year

Deferred tax

Tax on loss on ordinary activities

 

30 Sep 2023

30 Sep 2022

GBP

GBP

Loss on ordinary activities before tax

(1,397,967)

(1,085,474)

Tax charge at 19%

(265,614)

(206,240)

Tax effect of expenses not deductible for tax

24,993

34,709

Tax losses for which no deferred tax asset is recognised

240,621

171,531

Taxation charge for the year

The Parent Company has accumulated tax losses arising in the UK of £3,002,632 (2022: £2,480,826) that are available, under current legislation, to be carried forward against future profits.

Following an inspection by the Ugandan tax authorities of the tax affairs of CARU covering the period between January 2014 and December 2022, the Group has incurred a capital gains tax charge of £392,425. This related to the acquisition by the Company of  CARU in 2019. The amount was chargeable to the former owners, however this was not settled by them and under Ugandan legislation the liability is reclaimable from the acquirer if it cannot be obtained from the seller. This amount has been included within administrative expenses, as it does not relate to the profits or gains made by the Group.

9.   Intangible and other assets

For the year ended 30 September 2023 intangible assets represent only capitalised costs associated with the Group’s exploration, evaluation and development of mineral resources.

Group

Exploration assets

Total

GBP

GBP

Balance at 30 September 2021

5,296,289

5,296,289

Additions – during the year

1,423,236

1,423,236

Impairment-Alelikongo costs

(404,533)

(404,533)

Exchange differences

300,261

300,261

Balance at 30 September 2022

6,615,253

6,615,253

Additions – during the year

1,190,977

1,190,977

Exchange differences

(201,666)

(201,666)

Balance at 30 September 2023

7,604,564

7,604,564

On 22 February 2022 the Group entered project Akelikongo which is a Nickel project with SIPA this project was to be acquired in stages. On completion of the first stage, the Board made a decision to terminate the agreement on 6 September 2022 so that they could focus on the Orom-Cross project, following the positive results from its pre-feasibility study. As a result, the costs capitalised relating to the Akelikongo project were fully impaired at that date.

Additions during the year represent exploration costs at Orom-Cross Graphite Project. Management performed a review for indications of impairment as at 30 September 2023 and concluded no impairment was required.

10. Loss per share

The calculation of the basic and diluted loss per share is based on the following data:

30 Sep 2023

30 Sep 2022

Earnings

Loss from continuing operations for the year attributable to the equity holders of the Company (£)

(1,397,967)

(1,085,474)

Number of shares

Weighted average number of Ordinary Shares for the purpose of basic and diluted earnings per share

200,041,594

160,790,224

Basic and diluted loss per share (pence)

(0.70)

(0.68)

11. Investment in subsidiary

Details of the Company’s subsidiary at 30 September 2023 are as follows:

Name of the subsidiary

Place of incorporation

Portion of ordinary shares held

Principal activity

Consolidated African Resources Limited (Formerly Blencowe Resources Uganda Limited)

Uganda

100%

Exploration

30 Sep 2023

30 Sep 2022

Investments in subsidiary

Investments at the beginning of the year as previously stated

4,892,924

3,936,953

Additions during the year

1,135,016

955,971

Total investment in subsidiary

6,027,940

4,892,924

12. Long term: non-current assets

30 Sep 2023

30 Sep 2022

Group

Company

Group

Company

GBP

GBP

GBP

GBP

Loan to subsidiaries (see below)

707,268

549,415

Less: ECL provision

(35,363)

(27,471)

Total

671,905

521,944

On 18 December 2020 the Company and its subsidiary entered into a loan agreement. This agreement replaces any previous loan agreements. The facility is for an amount up to £5,000,000 and carries a base  interest of 5% plus Bank of England interest rate per annum chargeable at year end. Following the acquisition of CARU, the loan is considered to be a long-term asset.

During the year, the Company agreed to cover some expenses for Consolidated African Resources Limited (CARU) for the value of £96,051 (2022: £88,148). The amount borrowed at the year end was £589,062 (2022: £487,081). The total interest charged for the year ended 30 September 2021 was £55,873 (2022: £24,351). The interest payable at the year end was £118,206 (2022: £62,334).

The value of the loan is subject to 12 months ECL of 5%, representing the possible default events over the next 12 months of the financial instrument.  Due to the increase of expenses paid by the Company on behalf of CARU, the loan and its interest has increased, this has led to an increase in the provision during the year.

30 Sep 2023

30 Sep 2022

Group

Company

Group

Company

GBP

GBP

GBP

GBP

Brought forward ECL provision

27,471

23,463

Provision expense

7,892

4,008

Carried forward ECL provision

35,363

27,471

13. Trade and other receivables

30 Sep 2023

30 Sep 2022

Group

Company

Group

Company

GBP

GBP

GBP

GBP

Other receivables

9,421

9,421

24,765

24,364

Amounts due from subsidiary

310,334

229,584

Prepayments

22,442

22,442

61,082

61,082

Total

31,863

342,197

85,847

315,030

Included within other receivables is amounts receivable from CARU.

Group

Company

Group

Company

GBP

GBP

GBP

GBP

Amount receivable from CARU (formerly BRUL)

326,667

241,667

Less: ECL provision

(16,333)

(12,083)

Total

310,334

229,584

In the current year the value of the receivable was subject to 12 months ECL of 5%.  The increase in the provision expense is due to the charge of management fees from the Company to its subsidiary CARU.  As of the year end, the amount that CARU (formerly BRUL) owes the Company on management services was £326,667 (2022: £241,667).

30 Sep 2023

30 Sep 2022

Group

Company

Group

Company

GBP

GBP

GBP

GBP

Brought forward ECL provision

12,083

7,084

Provision expense

4,250

4,999

Carried forward ECL provision

16,333

12,083

14. Creditors: Amounts falling due within one year

30 Sep 2023

30 Sep 2022

Group

Company

Group

Company

GBP

GBP

GBP

GBP

Trade Payables

644,585

528,708

140,018

127,577

Land Owners Liability

154,403

Ugandan taxes (note 8)

392,425

Accruals

39,159

39,159

31,954

31,953

Total

1,076,169

326,375

159,530

15. Creditors: Amounts falling after one year

The Ugandan Mining Act 2003 requires an applicant for a mining lease to obtain surface rights from landowners in the mineral area before the respective mining lease can be granted. Accordingly, when the Group acquired its subsidiary, it obtained surface rights by way of 49 years lease over the area. The liability to the landowners is to be paid in 10 instalments on a section basis as the project progresses.  The progress on each section is not limited to any time frames and is at the Group’s discretion.

On 10 September 2022 the surface rights agreement was revised and signed between the Locomo Communal Land Association and Consolidated African Resources Limited, the surface rights remain at 49 years. The liability to the land owners will be paid in 8 instalments at defined dates with the final payment due in 2035.

30 Sep 2023

30 Sep 2022

GBP

                                              GBP

Total payable as at 1 October

978,255

887,560

Change in estimate

(51,316)

Utilisation

(148,468)

Interest charged during the period

45,748

45,916

Exchange (gain)/loss

(56,620)

96,095

Total payable as at 30 September

818,915

978,255

Analysis between current and non-current liability

Payable within 12 months

154,403

Payable after 12 months

818,915

823,852

818,915

978,255

The value of the liability is measured at the present value of the contractual payments due to the Land Owners’ Association over the lease term, with the discount rate of 5%.

At the statement of financial position date, the Group undiscounted amount payable to the Land Owners is;

2023

2022

GBP

GBP

Payable within 1 years

154,403

Payable within 2-5 years

290,388

308,806

Payable after 5 years

871,164

926,418

1,161,552

1,389,627

                                  Share capital

Number of shares issued

Nominal value per share

Share capital

Share Premium

Total share capital

GBP

GBP

GBP

GBP

At 30 Sep 2021

121,929,950

901,316

5,132,081

6,033,397

Issue of Ordinary Shares

56,000,000

0.005

280,000

2,520,000

2,800,000

Share issue costs

(171,252)

(171,252)

At 30 Sep 2022

177,929,950

1,181,316

7,480,829

8,662,145

Issue of Ordinary Shares

18,750,000

0.005

93,750

656,250

750,000

Issue of Ordinary Shares

12,700,000

0.005

63,500

571,500

635,000

Share issue costs

(71,180)

(71,180)

At 30 Sep 2023

209,379,950

1,338,566

8,637,399

9,975,965

During the year ended 30 September 2023, the Company issued the following shares;

Date

Number of Ordinary Shares issued

Nominal Share Value

Share price

GBP

GBP

26 October 2022

18,750,000

0.005

0.0400

18 May 2023

12,700,000

0.005

0.0500

All of the shares issued are classed as ordinary and have similar rights attached to them. 9,375,000 warrants classified as equity were issued with the 26 October 2022 share issue, and a further 6,350,000 warrants classified as equity were issued with the 18 May 2023 share issue.

The Directors are authorised to issue 209,379,950 ordinary shares.  As at 30 September 2023 the number of shares issued and fully paid were 209,344,950 (2022: 177,594,950), 35,000 shares are unpaid at 30 September 2023 (2022: unpaid shares 335,000).

16. Share based payments

Warrants

The following warrants were issued in exchange for a good or service:

30 Sep 2023

30 Sep 2022

Warrants

Number warrants

Weighted Average exercise price

Number warrants

Weighted Average exercise price

Outstanding on 01 Oct

1,250,000

6.00p

1,250,000

6.00p

Issued during the year

Cancelled/ Exercised

(1,250,000)

Outstanding on 30 Sep

6.00p

1,250,000

6.00p

Weighted average remaining contractual Life

0.57 years

The warrants have no vesting period and have been recognised in full upon issue. If the warrants remain unexercised after a period of three years from the date of grant, they will expire. The holder may exercise the subscription right at any time within the subscription period.

The above warrants were valued using the Black Scholes valuation method. The assumptions used are detailed below. The expected future volatility has been determined by reference to the average volatility of similar entities:

Warrants

30 Sep 2022

Weighted Average Share Price

6.00p

Weighted Average Exercise Price

6.00p

Expected Volatility

56%

Expected Life

3 years

Risk-free Rate

0.23%

Expected Dividend

Nil

Weighted Average Fair Value (GBP)

32,603

Options

The following options were issued in exchange for a good or service:

30 Sep 2023

30 Sep 2022

Options

Number Options

Weighted Average exercise price

Number Options

Weighted Average exercise price

Outstanding on 01 Oct

16,000,000

6.00p

10,000,000

6.00p

Issued during the year

5,000,000

5.00p

6,000,000

6.00p

Cancelled/ Exercised

Outstanding on 30 Sept

21,000,000

5.76p

16,000,000

6.00p

Weighted average remaining contractual Life

3.23 years

3.78 years

The options issued prior to 1 October 2021 have no vesting periods and have been recognised upon issue. If the options remain unexercised after a period of five years from the date of grant, they will expire. The share options cannot be exercised if the holder has ceased employment.

The options issued in the current year and prior year include a market based vesting condition, the share options would only vest if the share price of the Company trades in excess of 10p per share for 10 consecutive days.

The above options were valued using the Black Scholes valuation method, adjusted for the probability of meeting the market-based vesting condition. The assumptions used for the options granted in the current and prior period are detailed below. The expected future volatility has been determined by reference to the average volatility of similar entities during the year:

Options

               30 Sep 2023

                        30 Sep 2022

Share Price

4.6p

4.3p

Exercise Price

5.00p

6.00p

Expected Volatility

67%

48%

Expected Life

5 years

5 years

Risk-free Rate

3.47%

0.76%

Expected Dividend

Nil

Nil

Fair Value (GBP)

26,194

84,272

Deferred Tax

No deferred tax asset has been recognised in respect of share options and warrants due to the uncertainty of the future trading profits.

17. Financial instruments

17.1   Categories of financial instruments

30 Sep 2023

30 Sep 2022

Group

Company

Group

Company

GBP

GBP

GBP

GBP

Financial assets at amortised cost

Trade and other receivables

9,421

319,755

24,765

253,948

Cash and cash equivalents

129,853

129,853

346,994

346,994

Financial liabilities at amortised cost

Trade and other payables

1,076,169

567,867

326,375

159,530

Surface liability

818,915

978,255

17.2   Financial risk management objectives and policies

The Company’s major financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, trade and other payables and  other receivables. The fair value of the Groups financial instruments are equal to their carrying value. Details of these financial instruments are disclosed in respective notes. The risks associated with these financial instruments, and the policies on how to mitigate these risks are set out below. The management manages and monitors these exposures to ensure appropriate measures are implemented in a timely and effective manner.

Currency risk

The Group operates internationally and is exposed to foreign exchange risk arising from various currency exposures, primarily with respect to the United States Dollar (“USD”) and Ugandan shilling (“UGX”).  Foreign exchange risk arises from recognised monetary assets and liabilities.  The Group also exposes to currency exposure, BRUL expenses are paid in both USD and UGX, with the amount payable to the land owners denominated in UGX.

The table below summaries the financial assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies.

30 Sep 2023

30 Sep 2022

USD

UGX

USD

UGX

Financial Assets

891

1,534

Financial Liabilities

41,827

818,915

35,509

978,256

With all other variables held constant, the effect on profit and loss had the functional currency of the Group weakened or strengthened against USD/UGX by 5% at the year end results in a £29,532 (2022: £28,709) change in value.

Credit risk

Credit risk arises on cash balances. The amount of credit risk is equal to the amounts stated in the statements of financial position for each of the assets (notes 12 & 13).

The Group’s policy to manage this risk is to deal with banks that are regulated entities.  The Group’s principal banker, Barclays Bank PLC, is regulated by the United Kingdom Financial Services Authority, and has a credit rating of A1 (2022: A1).

Liquidity risk

Prudent liquidity risk management implies maintaining sufficient cash and marketable securities and the availability of funding through an adequate amount of committed credit. The Company aims to maintain flexibility in funding.

The maturity of the Company’s financial liabilities at the statement of financial position date, based on the contracted undiscounted payments is disclosed in notes 14, falls within one year and payable on demand.

Capital risk

The Company defines capital as the total equity of the Company. The Company’s objectives when managing capital are to safeguard the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern in order to provide returns for shareholders and benefits for other stakeholders and to maintain an optimal capital structure to reduce the cost of capital.

18. Related party transactions

Details of Directors’ remuneration are disclosed in note 6.

Sam Quinn is a director and shareholder of the Company and a Director of Lionshead Consultants Limited.  During the year, Lionshead Consultants Limited charged consultancy fees of £36,000 (2022: £24,000).

19. Events after the reporting date

On 10 October 2023, the Company announced that it had received its first US$1 million mobilisation tranche payment from the Development Finance Corporation. On 25 January 2024 an additional US$1 million tranche was received from the Development Finance Corporation and the total received now is US$2 million. This represents 40% of the full US$5 million DFC grant for the Definitive Feasibility Study costs.

#TM1 Technology Minerals Plc – Recyclus appoints Head of Research and Development

Technology Minerals Plc (LSE: TM1), the first listed UK company focused on creating a sustainable circular economy for battery metals, is pleased to announce that its 49% owned battery recycling business, Recyclus Group Ltd (“Recyclus”), has appointed Nick Pickard as Head of Research and Development, effective from 3 January 2023.

 

Nick has more than 30 years’ experience designing, manufacturing and servicing recycling machinery. He has worked with some of the largest mining corporate partners across Europe, Australia, South Africa, India and the UK in the design and build ofshredding, crushing and size reducing mining systems. Examples include Osborn GmbH, Kawasaki Heavy Industries Limited, Krupp Fördertechnik GmbH, Böhringer Group and Meta Nikel Kobalt A.Ş.

More recently, Nick has designed and developed turnkey solutions for a full range of battery recycling systems for both lead-acid and lithium-ion and led the design and build of Recyclus’ lithium-ion battery recycling plant. His knowledge and expertise in this field will help to further develop Recyclus’ recycling machinery and its applications.

During his career, Nick has developed a range of heavy-duty recycling machinery and systems, covering various materials including tyres, mattresses, plastics, commercial waste, glass, ferrous and non-ferrous metals. Previously, Nick designed a semi-mobile weapons destruction system for use in Kosovo following the Balkan conflict. The machine recycles and separates the materials for reuse in agricultural equipment including ploughs, tools and other items to help rebuild war-torn communities.

Robin Brundle, Chairman of Technology Minerals, said: “Nick is a truly talented engineer and innovator, who has already contributed so much to Recyclus through his valuable contributions to the design of our lithium-ion battery shredding plant. I look forward to seeing him apply his inventive mind to further improving our battery shredding plants and keep us at the cutting-edge of battery recycling technology.”

Nick Pickard, incoming of Head of Research and Development at Recyclus, said: “It is great to be joining the company at such an exciting time. Improving battery recycling is a passion for me and I am thrilled to be working with the team here to create new methods, and improve existing ones, to recycle batteries and help support the green transition.”

Enquiries

Technology Minerals Plc

Robin Brundle, Executive Chairman

Alexander Stanbury, Chief Executive Officer

+44 (0)20 4582 3500

Oberon Investments Limited

Nick Lovering, Adam Pollock

+44 (0)20 3179 0535

Arden Partners Plc

Ruari McGirr

+44 (0)207 614 5900

Gracechurch Group

Harry Chathli, Alexis Gore, William Dobinson

+44 (0)20 4582 3500

 

 

Technology Minerals Plc 

 

Technology Minerals is developing the UK’s first listed, sustainable circular economy for battery metals, using cutting-edge technology to recycle, recover, and re-use battery technologies for a renewable energy future. Technology Minerals is focused on extracting raw materials required for Li-ion batteries, whilst solving the ecological issue of spent Li-ion batteries, by recycling them for re-use by battery manufacturers. With the increasing global demand for battery metals to supply electrification, the group will explore, mine, and recycle metals from spent batteries. Further information on Technology Minerals is available atwww.technologyminerals.co.uk  

 

#TM1 Technology Minerals – £4 million convertible bond facility

Technology Minerals Plc (LSE: TM1), the first listed UK company focused on creating a sustainable circular economy for battery metals, is pleased to announce that it has entered into a £4.0 million convertible bond facility (the “Facility”) with Macquarie Bank Limited (“MBL”) and Atlas Capital Markets LLC (“ACM”).

 

Use of Funds

 

The Facility would be used primarily to enable the Company to:

 

·Ramp up of the first phase of operations at the Tipton lead-acid battery recycling plant and prepare to commence industrial-scale processing through an automated plant following approval from the Environmental Agency

·Support operating costs and capital expenditure required to accelerate the Company’s twin-track growth strategy to create a circular economy for battery metals to capture the industrial scale opportunity for recycling Lithium- ion and lead-acid batteries

 

Details of the Proposed Facility

 

Under the Facility, MBL and ACM will provide a £4.0 million convertible bond facility with a coupon of 5% per annum over the SONIA rate, payable quarterly in cash or in shares at the Company’s discretion. The Facility can be drawn in eight tranches of up to £500,000 with each tranche being called at Technology Mineral’s discretion once the previous tranche has been fully converted and subject to certain conditions. MBL and ACM will purchase the convertible bonds at a fixed price equal to 95% of the principal amount. MBL will purchase the first tranche, and each subsequent tranche will be purchased by MBL or ACM pursuant to the terms of the subscription agreement among the parties.

 

MBL and ACM can convert the convertible bonds to Technology Minerals shares (“Shares”) by issuing a conversion notice with the price set at 90% of the 3-day Volume Weighted Average Price of the Shares, where the 3 days may be consecutive or not and are selected by MBL or ACM (as applicable) from the 20 days prior to the issue of a conversion notice by MBL or ACM. The convertible bonds shall have a maturity of two years from issuance.

 

The Company will pay a transaction fee equal to 3% of each tranche (the “Commission”). The Commission is payable in cash, and may be deducted from the amount payable by MBL or ACM (as applicable) to Technology Minerals for each tranche.

 

In addition, warrants amounting to 30% of each tranche will be attached to each tranche of the convertible bonds. The warrants will have a strike price fixed at 30% premium to the Volume Weighted Average Price of the Shares for the 5 consecutive days prior to the issue date of each tranche. The warrants will expire two years after issuance.

 

The convertible bonds would be capable of redemption at any time by the Company with 60 business days’ notice at par plus 10% premium of the principal amount remaining.

 

MBL and ACM would be unable to convert the convertible bonds to Shares where such conversion would mean that it would become interested (as defined in the City Code on Takeovers and Mergers (the “Takeover Code”)) in shares that in aggregate carry more than 29.9 per cent of the of the voting rights of the Technology Minerals.

 

Shareholder Approval

 

The Company will seek shareholder approval should this be required in order to issue the convertible bonds in accordance with the tranches which may be drawn under the Facility.

Alex Stanbury, CEO of Technology Minerals, said: “We are delighted by the confidence Macquarie Bank and Atlas Capital Markets have shown in us and look forward to working with them closely as we turn our focus to scaling operations domestically and overseas. The £4.0m convertible bond facility complements our fundraise in November and strengthens the Company’s position as we look to ramp up our operations at Tipton and progress with our twin-track growth strategy to create a circular economy for battery metals.”

Enquiries

Technology Minerals Plc

Robin Brundle, Executive Chairman

Alexander Stanbury, Chief Executive Officer

+44 (0)20 4582 3500

Oberon Investments Limited

Nick Lovering, Adam Pollock

+44 (0)20 3179 0535

Arden Partners Plc

Ruari McGirr

+44 (0)207 614 5900

Gracechurch Group

Harry Chathli, Alexis Gore, William Dobinson

+44 (0)20 4582 3500

 

 

Technology Minerals Plc 

 

Technology Minerals is developing the UK’s first listed, sustainable circular economy for battery metals, using cutting-edge technology to recycle, recover, and re-use battery technologies for a renewable energy future. Technology Minerals is focused on extracting raw materials required for Li-ion batteries, whilst solving the ecological issue of spent Li-ion batteries, by recycling them for re-use by battery manufacturers. With the increasing global demand for battery metals to supply electrification, the group will explore, mine, and recycle metals from spent batteries. Further information on Technology Minerals is available at www.technologyminerals.co.uk  

 

Macquarie Bank Limited

Macquarie Bank Limited (ABN 46 008 583 542), a corporation constituted with limited liability under the laws of the Commonwealth of Australia and authorised to carry on banking business in, amongst others, the Commonwealth of Australia, and the United Kingdom. Macquarie Bank’s expertise covers asset finance, lending, banking and risk and capital solutions across debt, equity and commodities.

 

Atlas Capital Markets LLC

Atlas Capital Markets (“ACM”) is an investment company based in London, founded in 2012. ACM is managed by a team of experienced professionals that has originated, structured and managed over $10bn in special situation financing and asset-orientated investments globally. ACM takes pride in the relationship fostered with each portfolio company and the added value we bring in expertise and strategic introductions in addition to our invested capital. ACM’s management has decades of experience and has executed numerous deals across the world successfully.

Clean Energy Metals – Dealing with the Supply Squeeze

#TM1- Technology Minerals

 

Clean Energy Metals – Dealing with the Supply Squeeze

Critical window of opportunity to create a circular ecosystem for battery metals

The failure of national governments to reach a major agreement at the COP27 Summit this year underlined the difficulty and urgency in reaching net zero. The lack of progress from the governmental side means that it falls to the private sector to provide meaningful solutions. Resource efficiency, energy, and mobility transition are crucial strategies to mitigate climate change. The focus is on reducing the consumption of resources, especially energy and raw materials.

While raw materials are the basis of our material world, their excessive consumption over recent decades has also contributed significantly to climate change. However, raw materials, and, in this case, especially metals, play a key enabling role for climate protection technologies, such as electro mobility, the hydrogen economy, and solar and wind power plants, and also for digitalisation. It is now vital to make the use of raw materials much more resource-efficient and to use them as purposefully as possible.

Source: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13563-022-00319-1

Source: https://www.alliedmarketresearch.com/battery-recycling-market

There is overwhelming evidence to show that advanced circular economy systems and sophisticated recycling technologies can build the backbone for the development of a resource efficient and sustainable society. Closed metal cycles are a key part of this equation, securing relevant parts of the raw material supply for high-tech products and reducing CO2 emissions in their production at the same time.

Many mineral-producing countries that supply critical minerals are politically unstable, making them risky to invest in and to rely on as a source. This underscores the importance of developing sources of domestic supply, which offers greater political stability, greater safety for workers, and can provide a pipeline of young talent. These provide a foundation for the sector to build innovative solutions in response to the demands of the green transition.

The sources of many critical minerals for energy use are much less diversified than for hydrocarbons and sometimes concentrated in geographies that are highly problematic from an environmental and social perspective, such the Congo. The Congo accounts for almost 80% of the global supply of cobalt, much of which comes from so called ‘artisanal mining’ with its attendant exploitative labour conditions and environmental degradation.

 

The Delivery Challenge

To deliver on the green revolution and minimise emissions that contribute to climate change, industries will need access to significant quantities of critical minerals.

If you can’t make it or grow it, you have to mine it, so there will be an inevitable growth in the mining of critical raw materials, such as lithium-containing minerals. Source: https://britishlithium.co.uk/lithium-market/

 

Source: https://www.alliedmarketresearch.com/battery-recycling-market

The production of lithium in 2030 will need to be 60 times the market size of 2015, if production of the internal combustion engine becomes a reality within the 2030 to 2035 timescale. Electric vehicles are the primary driver of lithium demand and given lithium’s unique properties of light weight and high energy storage potential, it is highly likely to remain the material of choice in non-stationary batteries, whether in wet electrolyte or solid-state form.

The sustainable supply of the battery metals cobalt, nickel, lithium, manganese, and copper is a decisive factor for the success of electro mobility. Given the current global availability of resources and the imminent tsunamic surge in demand to sustain surging production levels recycling and reuse of batteries represents an increasingly important component of the future raw material supply. An effective circular economy for batteries can only be achieved if—in contrast to the current situation with many consumer goods — spent batteries can be fed into a comprehensive, technically advanced recycling network to re-enter the supply chain.

 

 

Source: https://www.alliedmarketresearch.com/battery-recycling-market

A London listed company Technology Minerals (LON: TM1) is seeking to meet these challenges head on. Billed as the UK’s first stock market listed ‘circular economy’ company, Technology Minerals combines a fast-growing lead acid and lithium-ion battery recycling network through its wholly owned subsidiary Recyclus Group with a series of battery metal mining projects sited strategically around the globe. Technology Minerals Chairman Robin Brundle explains: “The strategy of Technology Minerals is to build out its IP protected battery processing capacity in Europe while evaluating its portfolio of early-stage critical minerals projects. The current European market for Li-ion and lead-acid batteries totals 1.2mte pa of which some 72% are lead-acid and of which the automotive market consumes 70%. Within automotive, Li-ion currently accounts for just 10% but that is set to grow exponentially in line with increased EV penetration.”

The global recycling batteries market size was valued at $11.1 billion in 2020 and is expected to reach to $66.6 billion by 2030.

While EVs don’t emit CO2, lithium-ion batteries are made from raw materials, including lithium, cobalt, and nickel. With the coming supply squeeze, the mining of many of these materials can also raise ethical and environmental concerns.

Currently, there are very few lithium-ion battery recycling centres, due in part to lithium-ion batteries being both costly and difficult to recycle. According to some estimates, the current recycle rate is less than 5%. According to a recent Wired article, “While you can re-use most parts in EVs, the batteries aren’t designed to be recycled or reused.” And if the batteries are disposed into landfill sites, the battery metals can contaminate both water and soil.

Source: https://www.alliedmarketresearch.com/battery-recycling-market

 

The Size of the Problem

  • Global stock of electric vehicles (EVs) could reach 245 million units by 2030, according to the International Energy Agency.
  • While EVs emit less CO2, their batteries are tough to recycle.
  • Ming cobalt, lithium, and nickel can raise ethical and environmental concerns.
  • Creating a circular supply chain by recycling the batteries’ raw materials will be vital in reducing their environmental impact.

Source: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2021/05/electric-vehicle-battery-recycling-circular-economy/

Lithium-ion batteries are also used for 90% of grid energy storage around the world, especially for wind and solar energy. Initiatives such as the EU’s plan to reduce its dependence on Russian natural gas by two-thirds, which relies in part on accelerated generation of renewable energy, will significantly increase demand for battery storage.

Source: https://www.bcg.com/publications/2022/the-lithium-supply-crunch-doesnt-have-to-stall-electric-cars

The sustainable supply of battery metals such as lithium, cobalt, nickel, manganese, and copper is a decisive factor for the success of electro mobility and clean technologies. The current targets set by governments at home and abroad for the switch to EVs and clean technology leaves recycling and reuse of batteries as the only practical step available to meet demand based on current forecasts for sourcing new battery metal production hubs. This circular economy for batteries can only be realised if—in contrast to the current situation with many consumer goods—there is a global network to collect spent batteries allied to large scale, high-quality recycling facilities.

 

Does the UK offer practical battery metal / clean-tech project opportunities?

Accelerating the shift to zero-emission vehicles is a key element if the 68% reduction in carbon emissions targeted by the Government by 2030 is to be achieved. The UK’s EV market is growing rapidly, with EV registrations increasing by approximately 173% from 2019 to 2020.

Current projections state that approximately 1.4 million EV battery packs will be coming to the end of their “useful life” every year by 2040. This roughly equates to 203,000 tons of batteries for recycling annually (based on a 60% recycling rate) at that point.

The UK currently lacks industrial capacity for lithium-ion battery recycling, resulting in the current costly reliance on mainland Europe when supplying batteries for material recovery after their useful life. With the average value of materials contained in an end-of-life automotive pack in 2018 being £1,200 for Battery Electric Vehicles (BEVs) and £260 for Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles (PHEVs), there is a huge opportunity in the UK to recycle lithium-ion batteries.

Source: https://hvm.catapult.org.uk/news/automotive-battery-recycling-an-opportunity-the-uk-cant-afford-to-miss/#

Technology Minerals Chairman Robin Brundle comments; “The automotive sector is doing its part to pivot to all-electric, but it needs an effective and competitive ecosystem that will be largely self-sustaining, with job creation, skillset expansion and support for COP27 goals, both domestically and abroad, coming to the fore. This way, our automotive industry will continue to advance our extraordinary UK R&D and engineering skillsets so that they are fit for purpose well into the next sustainable decade.  Recycling is forecast to only be able to provide 22% of the supply that’s needed to power the transition. 78% will need to be extracted or brought in from elsewhere and each continent is facing this challenge – with many places creating barriers to export.”

 

Right Under Our Feet?

The UK has a rich history of mining, yet exploration and mine development have been neglected since WWII, with no new metalliferous mine being successfully built for 45 years.

Large-scale mining and modern processing can extract minerals that were not previously economic, safely, and with improved protection of the environment and community. New deposits could be found near old, narrow-veined, high-grade mines or in unexplored areas. Modern environmental controls, surveys, management, and remediation techniques can ensure that mineral production limits environment impact.

Technology Minerals Chairman Robin Brundle points out that the markets are very much aware that recycling alone will not generate sufficient raw materials and believes an ethical mining programme is critical: “We were once a prolific mining nation and those mines are still there – dormant, but in 2022, many appear to be economic once again due to the advancement in technology and commodity prices.”

Some steps have already been taken in this direction. After listing on London’s AIM market, Cornish Lithium #CUSN has assembled a large portfolio of mineral rights in Cornwall and has begun exploration for lithium-rich geothermal fluids.

 

Gigafactory Investment is Coming to the UK

There is progress in at least one area of the electro mobility and clean-tech supply chain: the British government is in talks with several companies to build gigafactories in the UK. Envision AESC has announced a new gigafactory next to its facility in Sunderland, while AMTE Power has also announced plans for a megafactory in Dundee. Further gigafactory and several supply chain announcements are expected in the coming months.
These developments are vital in maintaining a strong and prosperous automotive industry in the UK. On top of the global challenges from the COVID-19 pandemic, the war in Ukraine, and the rising costs of living, the challenges facing the UK automotive industry are very real and specific. 

“We all need not one but several gigafactories in the UK,” said Brundle. “Not having the ability to create batteries at home puts the future of the UK automotive sector in jeopardy—and the 823,000 direct and indirect jobs that go with it.  We need to secure more lithium for the UK and Europe, to create a flexible, sustainable supply chain that could also include developing domestic sources of key battery metals.”

 

How the Macro Backdrop and Supply Squeeze Will Make Recycling Increasingly Important

The Committee for Climate Change has suggested that 50% of new car and van sales would be battery electric or plug-in hybrid by 2035. Bringing forward deadlines for zero emission vehicles means we are now looking at 100% of new cars and vans being zero emission at the tailpipe by 2035.

The supply crunch will not hit immediately. Even though the price of lithium has surged more than tenfold over the past two years, there’s enough capacity to meet anticipated demand until around 2025—and potentially through 2030 if enough recycling operations come online. After that, chronic shortages are expected. Even assuming that all the new lithium-mining projects that the industry currently regards as probable or possible resources go into operation, as well as a significant expansion of lithium-recycling projects, lithium supply in 2030 is expected to fall around 4% short of projected demand, or by around 100,000 metric tons of lithium carbonate equivalent (the processed form of raw lithium). By 2035, that supply gap is projected to be acute—at least 1.1 million metric tons, or 24% less than demand.

 

Source: https://www.bcg.com/publications/2022/the-lithium-supply-crunch-doesnt-have-to-stall-electric-cars

It is more vital than ever that metals are recycled responsibly and effectively. This will:

  • Contribute to the conservation of raw materials, complementing the primary supply of important and partially critical metals for our society.
  • Significantly improve supply security, especially for many technology metals which currently are imported from outside Europe. Many metal imports derive from regions with higher geopolitical risks, hence making the European economy vulnerable to supply disruptions. Exploiting the European “urban mine” built from our end-of-life (EoL) products, infrastructure, and other residue streams reduces import dependence, improves the resilience of crucial value chains, and hence supports economic activities and jobs in Europe. The need for more supply chain resilience has become even more obvious in the context of the Covid-19 pandemic and the Ukraine war.
  • Contribute to cushion volatile metal prices as the additional supply of recycled metals can help to overcome demand–supply imbalances and increases the number of metal sources beyond the primary producers.
  • Reduce the CO2 footprint and overall environmental impact of raw materials supply. If taking place in state-of-the-art recycling facilities, in most cases the energy efficiency (per kg of metal) is better and the impact on water, air, soil, and biosphere is considerably lower than in mining operations. The main reason for this is that the metal concentration in most products is much higher than in geological deposits.
  • Be one pillar of responsible sourcing by providing transparent and clean supply chains.
  • Protect the environment as non-recycling or landfilling of end-of-life products, such as batteries, can emit hazardous substances.

 

How the Technology Minerals #TM1 Blueprint for Lithium-ion and Lead-acid Battery Recycling Will Be a Vital Part of the Supply Chain

The battery recycling market is growing at an accelerated rate, driven by automotive and industrial sectors transitioning to more environmentally friendly and sustainable electric solutions. The UK needs industrial-scale battery recycling technologies. There is currently no major UK capability to recycle lithium-ion batteries. Technology Minerals’ plants in Tipton and Wolverhampton aim to provide a national capability to recycle lead-acid and lithium-ion batteries. As a first-mover in the battery recycling sector, the company expects to open 10 plants over the next six years, with its innovative IP in the lithium-ion sector a driving factor in the expansion strategy.

Technology Minerals has developed a unique frontend process that can safely break open Li-ion batteries which are not suitable for repurposing, to recover the battery mineral rich ‘black mass’ they contain as well as other battery components. This is the only process currently capable of handling all five li-ion battery compositions simultaneously on an industrial scale. The solution is also modular and can be easily built on-site at OEMs, minimising transportation costs.Technology Minerals has also developed a significantly improved process to recover the lead from end-of-life lead-acid batteries as well as recovering the acid for re-use as electrolyte or for the manufacture of fertiliser or gypsum, subject to the preferred economics.

 

Conclusion

As the world races to decarbonise, industry needs a secure source of critical minerals to fuel the transition. Brundle said, “The only ways this can be achieved is creating new mines, opening old mines, and building a secondary source of supply through recycling.”

It is necessary to dramatically escalate new production of battery metals to allow industry to make the green switch. This must be coupled with the implementation of a circular ecosystem so that each mineral mined is used to its full potential. The urgency and scale of the transition means that nothing less than a maximal approach will suffice.

On the strategic level, there are two temporal considerations. Brundle explained, “We have a very narrow window of opportunity so there is a necessity to take action to avert the incoming supply crunch in the short-term, but there is also a longer-term need to create a sustainable, circular ecosystem for battery metals.” Urgent action is required to avoid the immediate shortfall of supply, but there is also a wider structural shift to circularity needed to ensure a decarbonised economy can continue to grow sustainably.

 

#TM1 Technology Minerals – Technology Minerals CEO Alex Stanbury talks on Proactive UK

 

Technology Minerals CEO Alex Stanbury talks to Katie Pilbeam on Proactive UK

Alex talks about next steps for Oacoma and Blackbird projects and exercising an option to acquire the Blackbird Creek Property in the US from DG Resource Management

#TM1 Technology Minerals – ‘Talking Batteries’ Part 2

‘Talking Batteries’ Part 2 by Robin Brundle, Chairman, Technology Minerals plc and Director, Recyclus Group + WMG’s Anwar Sattar, Lead Engineer in Battery Recycling, discussing the 5 key Lithium-ion battery chemistries and the Recyclus technology

Watch here 

Does EV and battery tech really sound the death knell for Oil and Gas?

Future of Oil and Gas

In an era of rising demand and hype for electric vehicles (EV) and battery technology, commodities and ETFs linked to oil and gas have managed to hold their prices. EV stocks like Tesla and Nio have increased by 71% and 100% respectively in the past year. The price of WTI Crude Oil has also increased by 76%, while prices of micro-cap oil stocks like #ECHO Echo Energy and #MSMN Mosman Oil and Gas have increased by 58% and 13% respectively.

This clearly signifies that even after the rise in demand of EVs, commodities like oil and gas are here to stay in the short and long term.

Consumers are under the impression that they could be in an oil-free world by 2030 and most consumers perceive batteries and electricity as the primary source of energy. However, this is highly unlikely and nothing but a series of myths planted in our brains due to effective marketing.

The International Energy Agency (IEA) that analyses trends in energy industry, released its annual World Energy Outlook in November 2019. It looks at potential energy demand and supply under different scenarios to explore different possible futures. The IEA scenario stated a global increase in energy demand by 24% by 2040 of which, oil and natural gas will supply 64% of the world’s energy needs. In accordance with the Paris Climate Agreement, if based on the Sustainable Development Scenario, the oil and natural gas will still supply 47% of the world’s energy by 2040.

More than 15% of oil demand goes into non-combusted use including petrochemicals which is expected to grow to 20% by 2040. Even if the demand for gasoline and other fuels may hypothetically be on the decline, the petrochemical sector, in contrast, still has room to grow. Some major companies have even pledged some $100bn into the petrochemical industry over the next decade.

Developing countries like India have one of the most aggressive renewable power capacity roll-out programmes worldwide. However, its access to affordable fossil fuels remains a priority for its government because its needs for cheap oil, gas and coal continue to rise to meet energy demand that is forecast to more than double by 2040. India’s petroleum minister Dharmendra Pradhan believes the world’s third-largest oil consumer could be the “golden goose” for crude suppliers as it buys more than 80% of its oil needs from foreign crude purchases.

The graph below demonstrates that the forecasted oil demand for 2040 is higher than present day with non-combusted being the driver to increase the demand. While in the primary energy consumption chart, oil is forecasted to maintain its consumption as a primary source by 2040. Whereas the primary consumption of gas is forecasted to rise.

 

(Financial Review, 2020)

 

Texas Oil Wells

In 2018, companies in the Permian Basin – “an ancient, oil-rich seabed that spans West Texas and South Eastern New Mexico — were producing twice as much oil as they had four years earlier” whilst forecasters expected the production to double again by 2023.

The International Energy Agency (IEA) had also predicted that American oil mostly from the Permian will account for 80% of growth in global supply over the next seven years.

Some small companies already had presence in the Permian Basin before these predictions and report in 2018. In 2017, Mosman Oil & Gas (MSMN) acquired several oil and gas leases comprising the Welch Permian Basin Project for a consideration of $310,000. Although the Welch project contributed to a gross profit of $167,000 in the year ended 30 June 2020, recently Mosman sold this Welch Project for $420,000 receiving a premium of 40% from the sale of the project alone.

Mosman is steadily growing its working interests across a number of projects in Texas, including Stanley, Falcon-1, Winters and Galaxie. These have produced a gross profit of over $500,000 in the 2020 year. Stanley also has a 100% success rate with oil production from four wells drilled to date.

Texas wells are providing high returns to oil companies, and with a growing number of projects and acreage, Mosman is well placed for future growth.

South Argentina Oil Wells

Many companies own wells in Argentina and Latin America as it is considered a region rich in resources with 4% of natural gas reserves and 20% of world oil reserves. They are also often undergoing positive development in macro conditions. A strong demand outlook for energy consumption and economic growth coupled with underdeveloped – but lower cost – onshore plays, makes Latin America a favourable region for companies like Echo Energy (ECHO) to deploy its expertise in support of an exploration-led growth strategy.

For the financial year ended 31 December 2020, Santa Cruz Sur at the south-eastern tip of Argentina helped Echo Energy to increase its revenue fourfold to US $11.1mn. This was also due to Echo securing new gas sales contracts at premium rates to the prevailing spot markets in early Q1 2021.

The increase in revenue drove an significant increase in the Echo Energy (ECHO) stock price by 51% from 55p to 83p between December 2020 and January 2021.

Major and Small Suppliers of Oil and Gas

The difference between the barrels of oil supplied can be huge when major suppliers are compared to the small suppliers. But all that glitters is not gold. High supply and production would require a higher demand to be profitable, if the demand of oil stagnates in the future it will affect the major suppliers before the small suppliers.

The big 10 companies accounted for 28% of global oil production in 2020 as shown below.

When this is compared to small oil producers like Echo Energy and Mosman Oil and Gas,  Echo Energy produced a cumulative of 94,000 barrels of oil in Santa Cruz Sur in South Argentina. While Mosman Oil and Gas produced a gross of 90,000 barrels of oil in the year ended June 2020. Based on available data, the production of Echo and Mosman combined is 0.2% of the global oil demand.

This is effective during times of recession or when the global demand is low as during unprecedented times a major oil supplier to generate profits and work at full capacity would need to sell between 5-12% of oil demand while small suppliers of oil would need to fulfil a negligible percentage of global demand of oil to turn profitable. This is due to high storing and inventory costs for major oil suppliers as well as higher fixed costs due to bigger operations.

Conclusion

Therefore, even though the oil demand is perceived to be lower in the future due to alternative resources, the demand doesn’t seem to be in decline due to oil having uses other than fuel and gas for cars and transportation like non-combusted petrochemicals. Even if the demand for oil is on the decline it would not affect small oil suppliers; as working at full capacity they fulfil just a small percentage of global oil demand and still manage to make hefty profits.

These among many, are the reasons keeping the oil prices buoyant and in the mix, not only for the present day but also for the future.

I would like to receive Brand Communications updates and news...
Free Stock Updates & News
I agree to have my personal information transfered to MailChimp ( more information )
Join over 3.000 visitors who are receiving our newsletter and learn how to optimize your blog for search engines, find free traffic, and monetize your website.
We hate spam. Your email address will not be sold or shared with anyone else.