Home » Posts tagged 'australian potash'
Tag Archives: australian potash
Salt Lake Potash #SO4 – Appendix 3B and Issue of Placement Shares
Salt Lake Potash Limited (the Company) has today released the following information on the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX), in accordance with the ASX Listing Rules.
The 25,476,000 ordinary shares of no par value (Ordinary Shares) represent the first tranche of the placement of 37.5 million Ordinary Shares (Placement) that was announced on 6 June 2019.
The balance of 12,024,000 Ordinary Shares are expected to be admitted to ASX and the full number of the Placement shares admitted to AIM on 18 June 2019.
For the purposes of the Financial Conduct Authority’s Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules (DTRs), following issue of the 25,476,000 Ordinary Shares, the Company will have 232,496,581 Ordinary Shares in issue with voting rights attached. The Company holds no shares in treasury. This figure of 232,496,581 may be used by shareholders in the Company as the denominator for the calculations by which they will determine if they are required to notify their interest in, or a change to their interest in the Company, under the ASX Listing Rules or the DTRs.
For further information please visit www.so4.com.au or contact:
Tony Swiericzuk / Clint McGhie |
Salt Lake Potash Limited |
Tel: +61 8 6559 5800 |
Jo Battershill |
Salt Lake Potash Limited |
Tel: +44 7540 366000 |
Colin Aaronson / Richard Tonthat / Ben Roberts |
Grant Thornton UK LLP (Nominated Adviser) |
Tel: +44 (0) 20 7383 5100 |
Derrick Lee / Beth McKiernan |
Cenkos Securities plc (Joint Broker) |
Tel: +44 (0) 131 220 6939 |
Rupert Fane / Ingo Hofmaier / Ernest Bell |
Hannam & Partners (Joint Broker) |
Tel: +44 (0) 20 7907 8500 |
Important Information
Rule 2.7, 3.10.3, 3.10.4, 3.10.5
Appendix 3B
New issue announcement, application for quotation of additional securities and agreement
Information or documents not available now must be given to ASX as soon as available. Information and documents given to ASX become ASX’s property and may be made public.
Introduced 01/07/96 Origin: Appendix 5 Amended 01/07/98, 01/09/99, 01/07/00, 30/09/01, 11/03/02, 01/01/03, 24/10/05, 01/08/12, 04/03/13
Name of entity |
SALT LAKE POTASH LIMITED |
ABN |
98 117 085 748 |
We (the entity) give ASX the following information.
Part 1 ‑ All issues
You must complete the relevant sections (attach sheets if there is not enough space).
1 |
+Class of +securities issued or to be issued
|
Ordinary Shares |
|||
2 |
Number of +securities issued or to be issued (if known) or maximum number which may be issued
|
25,476,000 |
|||
3 |
Principal terms of the +securities (e.g. if options, exercise price and expiry date; if partly paid +securities, the amount outstanding and due dates for payment; if +convertible securities, the conversion price and dates for conversion) |
Fully paid ordinary shares
|
|||
4 |
Do the +securities rank equally in all respects from the +issue date with an existing +class of quoted +securities? If the additional +securities do not rank equally, please state: · the date from which they do · the extent to which they participate for the next dividend, (in the case of a trust, distribution) or interest payment · the extent to which they do not rank equally, other than in relation to the next dividend, distribution or interest payment |
Yes
|
|||
5 |
Issue price or consideration
|
$0.54 |
|||
6 |
Purpose of the issue (If issued as consideration for the acquisition of assets, clearly identify those assets)
|
Proceeds from the issue will be used to fund ongoing construction of the Lake Way Project, including the development of on-lake infrastructure, the payment of deposits on certain process plant long-lead items, completion of feasibility studies, and general working capital. |
|||
6a |
Is the entity an +eligible entity that has obtained security holder approval under rule 7.1A? If Yes, complete sections 6b – 6h in relation to the+securities the subject of this Appendix 3B, and comply with section 6i |
Yes |
|||
6b |
The date the security holder resolution under rule 7.1A was passed |
30 November 2018 |
|||
6c |
Number of +securities issued without security holder approval under rule 7.1 |
4,822,231
|
|||
6d |
Number of +securities issued with security holder approval under rule 7.1A |
20,653,769 |
|||
6e |
Number of +securities issued with security holder approval under rule 7.3, or another specific security holder approval (specify date of meeting) |
Nil
|
|||
6f |
Number of +securities issued under an exception in rule 7.2 |
Nil |
|||
6g |
If +securities issued under rule 7.1A, was issue price at least 75% of 15 day VWAP as calculated under rule 7.1A.3? Include the +issue date and both values. Include the source of the VWAP calculation. |
Yes
Issue date: 14 June 2019 Issue price: $0.54 15 day VWAP: $0.6144
|
|||
6h |
If +securities were issued under rule 7.1A for non-cash consideration, state date on which valuation of consideration was released to ASX Market Announcements |
Not Applicable |
|||
6i |
Calculate the entity’s remaining issue capacity under rule 7.1 and rule 7.1A – complete Annexure 1 and release to ASX Market Announcements |
7.1 – 11,201,537 7.1A – Nil
|
|||
7 |
+Issue dates Note: The issue date may be prescribed by ASX (refer to the definition of issue date in rule 19.12). For example, the issue date for a pro rata entitlement issue must comply with the applicable timetable in Appendix 7A. Cross reference: item 33 of Appendix 3B. |
14 June 2019 |
|||
Number |
+Class |
||||
8 |
Number and +class of all +securities quoted on ASX (including the +securities in section 2 if applicable) |
232,496,581 |
Ordinary Shares |
||
Number |
+Class |
||
9 |
Number and +class of all +securities not quoted on ASX (including the +securities in section 2 if applicable)
|
7,500,000
10,000,000
750,000
1,000,000
250,000
500,000
750,000
400,000
1,700,000
2,750,000
3,000,000
21,095,016
|
Class B Performance Shares
Class C Performance Shares
Incentive Options exercise price $0.50, expiry date 29 April 2020
Incentive Options exercise price $0.60, expiry date 29 April 2021
Incentive Options exercise price $0.40, expiry date 30 June 2021
Incentive Options exercise price $0.50, expiry date 30 June 2021
Incentive Options exercise price $0.60, expiry date 30 June 2021
Incentive Options exercise price $0.70, expiry date 30 June 2021
Incentive Options exercise price $0.60, expiry date 1 November 2023
Incentive Options exercise price $1.00, expiry date 1 November 2023
Incentive Options exercise price $1.20, expiry date 1 November 2023
Performance rights which are subject to various performance conditions to be satisfied prior to the relevant expiry dates between 31 December 2018 and 1 November 2023 |
10 |
Dividend policy (in the case of a trust, distribution policy) on the increased capital (interests) |
Not Applicable |
Part 2 ‑ Pro rata issue
11 |
Is security holder approval required?
|
Not Applicable |
12 |
Is the issue renounceable or non-renounceable? |
Not Applicable |
13 |
Ratio in which the +securities will be offered |
Not Applicable |
14 |
+Class of +securities to which the offer relates |
Not Applicable |
15 |
+Record date to determine entitlements |
Not Applicable
|
16 |
Will holdings on different registers (or subregisters) be aggregated for calculating entitlements? |
Not Applicable |
17 |
Policy for deciding entitlements in relation to fractions
|
Not Applicable |
18 |
Names of countries in which the entity has security holders who will not be sent new offer documents Note: Security holders must be told how their entitlements are to be dealt with. Cross reference: rule 7.7. |
Not Applicable |
19 |
Closing date for receipt of acceptances or renunciations |
Not Applicable |
20 |
Names of any underwriters
|
Not Applicable |
21 |
Amount of any underwriting fee or commission |
Not Applicable |
22 |
Names of any brokers to the issue
|
Not Applicable |
23 |
Fee or commission payable to the broker to the issue |
Not Applicable |
24 |
Amount of any handling fee payable to brokers who lodge acceptances or renunciations on behalf of security holders |
Not Applicable |
25 |
If the issue is contingent on security holders’ approval, the date of the meeting |
Not Applicable |
26 |
Date entitlement and acceptance form and offer documents will be sent to persons entitled |
Not Applicable |
27 |
If the entity has issued options, and the terms entitle option holders to participate on exercise, the date on which notices will be sent to option holders |
Not Applicable |
28 |
Date rights trading will begin (if applicable) |
Not Applicable |
29 |
Date rights trading will end (if applicable)
|
Not Applicable |
30 |
How do security holders sell their entitlements in full through a broker? |
Not Applicable |
31 |
How do security holders sell part of their entitlements through a broker and accept for the balance? |
Not Applicable |
32 |
How do security holders dispose of their entitlements (except by sale through a broker)? |
Not Applicable |
33 |
+Issue date
|
Not Applicable |
Part 3 ‑ Quotation of securities
You need only complete this section if you are applying for quotation of securities
34 |
Type of +securities (tick one)
|
|
(a) |
+Securities described in Part 1 |
|
(b) |
All other +securities Example: restricted securities at the end of the escrowed period, partly paid securities that become fully paid, employee incentive share securities when restriction ends, securities issued on expiry or conversion of convertible securities |
Entities that have ticked box 34(a)
Additional securities forming a new class of securities
Tick to indicate you are providing the information or documents |
35 |
If the +securities are +equity securities, the names of the 20 largest holders of the additional +securities, and the number and percentage of additional +securities held by those holders |
|
36 |
If the +securities are +equity securities, a distribution schedule of the additional +securities setting out the number of holders in the categories 1 – 1,000 1,001 – 5,000 5,001 – 10,000 10,001 – 100,000 100,001 and over |
|
37 |
A copy of any trust deed for the additional +securities |
Entities that have ticked box 34(b)
38 |
Number of +securities for which +quotation is sought
|
Not Applicable |
||
39 |
+Class of +securities for which quotation is sought
|
Not Applicable |
||
40 |
Do the +securities rank equally in all respects from the +issue date with an existing +class of quoted +securities? If the additional +securities do not rank equally, please state: · the date from which they do · the extent to which they participate for the next dividend, (in the case of a trust, distribution) or interest payment · the extent to which they do not rank equally, other than in relation to the next dividend, distribution or interest payment |
Not Applicable |
||
41 |
Reason for request for quotation now Example: In the case of restricted securities, end of restriction period (if issued upon conversion of another +security, clearly identify that other +security) |
Not Applicable |
||
Number |
+Class |
|||
42 |
Number and +class of all +securities quoted on ASX (including the +securities in clause 38)
|
|||
Quotation agreement
1 +Quotation of our additional +securities is in ASX’s absolute discretion. ASX may quote the +securities on any conditions it decides.
2 We warrant the following to ASX.
· The issue of the +securities to be quoted complies with the law and is not for an illegal purpose.
· There is no reason why those +securities should not be granted +quotation.
· An offer of the +securities for sale within 12 months after their issue will not require disclosure under section 707(3) or section 1012C(6) of the Corporations Act.
Note: An entity may need to obtain appropriate warranties from subscribers for the securities in order to be able to give this warranty
· Section 724 or section 1016E of the Corporations Act does not apply to any applications received by us in relation to any +securities to be quoted and that no-one has any right to return any +securities to be quoted under sections 737, 738 or 1016F of the Corporations Act at the time that we request that the +securities be quoted.
· If we are a trust, we warrant that no person has the right to return the +securities to be quoted under section 1019B of the Corporations Act at the time that we request that the +securities be quoted.
3 We will indemnify ASX to the fullest extent permitted by law in respect of any claim, action or expense arising from or connected with any breach of the warranties in this agreement.
4 We give ASX the information and documents required by this form. If any information or document is not available now, we will give it to ASX before +quotation of the +securities begins. We acknowledge that ASX is relying on the information and documents. We warrant that they are (will be) true and complete.
Sign here: ………………………………………………….. Date: 14 June 2019
(Director/Company secretary)
Print name: Clint McGhie
== == == == ==
Notice Under Section 708A
Salt Lake Potash Limited (the Company) has today issued 25,476,000 fully paid ordinary shares. The issued shares are part of a class of securities quoted on Australian Securities Exchange (“ASX”).
The Company hereby notifies ASX under paragraph 708A(5)(e) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cwth) (the “Act”) that:
1. the Company issued the securities without disclosure to investors under Part 6D.2 of the Act;
2. as at the date of this notice, the Company has complied with the provisions of Chapter 2M of the Corporations Act as they apply to the Company, and section 674 of the Act; and
3. as at the date of this notice, there is no information that is “excluded information” within the meaning of sections 708A(7) and (8) of the Act.
Salt Lake Potash (SO4) Exceptional Economics of Commercial Scale Development and Lake Way
Salt Lake Potash Limited (Salt Lake Potash or Company) is pleased to report the results of the Company’s Scoping Study for a commercial scale Sulphate of Potash (SOP) development at Lake Way (Lake Way Project or Project) in Western Australia.
Based on the Scoping Study results, the Project generates exceptional economic returns due to its low capital intensity, bottom quartile operating costs and sustainable operating life.
Cautionary Statement
The Scoping Study referred to in this announcement has been undertaken to determine the potential viability of a Sulphate of Potash (SOP) development at the Lake Way Project. The Scoping Study has been prepared to an accuracy level of ±30%. The results should not be considered a profit forecast or production forecast.
The Scoping Study is a preliminary technical and economic study of the potential viability of the Lake Way Project. In accordance with the ASX Listing Rules, the Company advises it is based on low-level technical and economic assessments that are not sufficient to support the estimation of ore reserves. Further evaluation work including infill drilling and appropriate studies are required before Salt Lake Potash will be able to estimate any ore reserves or to provide any assurance of an economic development case.
Approximately 80% of the total production target is in the Measured resource category, 16% in the Indicated resource category and 4% is in the Inferred resource category. The Inferred resource included in the total production target is located at the southern end of Lake Way and is expected to be the last of the brine extraction system constructed. It does not feature as a significant portion of production either during the payback period or during the life of mine. Accordingly, the Company has concluded that it has reasonable grounds for disclosing a production target which includes a small amount of Inferred material. However, there is a low level of geological confidence associated with Inferred mineral resources and there is no certainty that further exploration work will result in the determination of Indicated mineral resources or that the production target itself will be realised.
The Scoping Study is based on the material assumptions outlined elsewhere in this announcement. These include assumptions about the availability of funding. While Salt Lake Potash considers all the material assumptions to be based on reasonable grounds, there is no certainty that they will prove to be correct or that the range of outcomes indicated by the Scoping Study will be achieved.
To achieve the range outcomes indicated in the Scoping Study, additional funding will likely be required. Investors should note that there is no certainty that Salt Lake Potash will be able to raise funding when needed. It is also possible that such funding may only be available on terms that dilute or otherwise affect the value of the Salt Lake Potash’s existing shares. It is also possible that Salt Lake Potash could pursue other ‘value realisation’ strategies such as sale, partial sale, or joint venture of the Project. If it does, this could materially reduce Salt Lake Potash’s proportionate ownership of the Project.
The Company has concluded it has a reasonable basis for providing the forward looking statements included in this announcement and believes that it has a reasonable basis to expect it will be able to fund the development of the Project. Given the uncertainties involved, investors should not make any investment decisions based solely on the results of the Scoping Study.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Salt Lake Potash is pleased to report the results of the Scoping Study for the commercial scale development of its SOP project at Lake Way. The Scoping Study demonstrates the potential for the Lake Way Project to support a low capital and operating cost operation with annual production of approximately 200,000 tonne of premium grade SOP.
The Scoping Study demonstrates the compelling economics of the commercial scale development of Lake Way with the ability to support a long mine life:
- Lake Way Project to produce an estimated 200,000 tonnes per year of premium grade SOP (>52% K2O)
- High-grade SOP resource underpins long Mine Life of 20 years
- Lowest operating cost for global SOP producers with an FOB operating cost estimate of $264/t (US$185/t)
- Low development capital requirements of approximately A$237m (US$166m) including a growth allowance of ~13% ($32m) supported by the close proximity to infrastructure
- Exceptional economics with estimated project post-tax NPV8 of A$381m (pre-tax NPV8 of A$580m) and post-tax IRR of 27% (pre-tax IRR 33%)
- Steady state EBITDA of A$90m annually and average annual after tax cashflow of A$64m
- Strong cashflow and low capital cost result in early payback period of 3.2 years
- Construction underway on the first phase of Evaporation Ponds (the Williamson Ponds) which will support the dewatering of the Williamson Pit’s super saturated brine with an SOP grade of 25kg/m3
- Plant commissioning expected Q4 2020 utilising salts from the Williamson Pit brine
- BFS currently underway with completion expected in Q3 2019 to support project financing
Salt Lake Potash has already significantly de-risked the commercial scale project through the early construction works on the first phase of the Evaporation Ponds (the Williamson Ponds). The de-watering of the Williamson Pit and commencement of evaporation will provide additional insight into the critical evaporation processes which in turn will further de-risk the project.
Lowest Operating Costs
The results of the study demonstrate the potential for very low operating costs. It is estimated that the Lake Way Project will have the lowest operating costs of any SOP operation globally with an FOB operating cost of $264/t (US$185/t).
Short Payback period
The low development capital requirements and significant margins received for the Lake Way Project provides a short payback period of just 3.2 years from first production. This will result in full repayment of development capital by 2024.
KCl Addition Opportunity
The resource at Lake Way contains a significant excess of sulphate (SO4) which provides the opportunity for the Company to explore value adding measures including a potassium chloride (KCl) reaction phase to the processing stage. Preliminary work has shown significant benefits to the Lake Way Project through the inclusion of the KCl reaction phase in the process, including a potential increase in annual production of SOP and subsequent improvements in financial returns to shareholders. The Company will explore this opportunity as part of the BFS for the Lake Way Project.
Robust Economics
The Study demonstrates that the Lake Way Project provides exceptional economics even under the most extreme downside pricing scenarios. The breakeven pricing scenario is a significant 40+% decrease in price at US$323/t.
Table 1: Pricing Scenarios
SOP Price |
Breakeven US$323/t |
US$400/t |
US$450/t |
US$500/t |
Base US$550/t |
US$600/t |
US$650/t |
NPV (post tax) |
– |
A$130m |
A$214m |
A$298m |
A$381m |
A$465m |
A$548m |
Project Funding Advanced
On 6 June 2019, the Company announced that it had received binding commitments for a placement to raise A$20.25m from strategic investors.
In addition, the Company is in advanced discussions with a debt provider for a debt funding package which will support funding for the Lake Way Project.
Next Steps
Having completed the successful Scoping Study, Salt Lake Potash has subsequently commenced a Bankable Feasibility Study (BFS) targeted for completion in Q3 2019. The Company has appointed GR Engineering Services Limited (GRES, ASX:GNG) as lead engineer for the BFS. GRES will work with a number of industry experts including Wood Saskatoon.
The BFS will include the following:
- Further drilling and trenching programs to increase resource definition and confidence levels for the Lake Way Resource including lake playa and paleochannel
- Additional test work at Saskatchewan Research Council (SRC) on the process flow sheet, including completion of two pilot plant test runs
- Review KCl opportunity and determine the options for the possible inclusion of a KCl reaction within the SOP Plant Process
- Refinement of logistics solution and identification of preferred constructors
- Update the trench hydraulic analysis and optimisation of trench design in partnership with Cardno
- Incorporate findings from the first phase of Evaporation Pond construction into the design and construction methodology for the commercial scale project
- On-going design and refinement of the Process Plant including partnering with vendors for major equipment including crystallisers to conduct testwork relevant to their equipment
SCOPING STUDY RESULTS
The Scoping Study is based on the Mineral Resource Estimate for the Lake Way Project reported in March 2019, comprising 8.2Mt of SOP calculated using Drainable Porosity (73 million tonnes of SOP using Total Porosity).
The Scoping Study assumes a mine life of 20 years with plant commissioning in Q4 2020. The study mine plan, comprising a network of trenches and paleochannel bores, provides for a 200,000tpa production run rate. Table 2 provides a summary of production and cost figures for the Project.
Table 2: Lake Way Project Overview
Lake Way Project |
Unit |
Estimated Value |
PHYSICAL |
||
Mine life |
years |
20 |
Annual Production of SOP |
tpa |
200,000 |
Mineral Mine Plan |
||
Measured Resource (Lake Way Playa)1.8Mt @ 15.2kg/m3 SOP |
% |
80 |
Indicated Resource (Paleochannel) 1.4Mt @ 13.6kg/m3 SOP |
% |
16 |
Inferred Resource (Lake Way Playa & Paleovalley) 5Mt @ 15.2kg/m3 SOP |
% |
4 |
MINING METHOD |
||
Trenches (production and transport) – average depth 5m |
km |
130 |
Bores – average depth 120m |
number |
14 |
Brine Chemistry (average Lake Brine SOP grade) |
Kg/m3 |
15.2 |
EVAPORATION PONDS |
||
Area |
ha |
1,325 |
Halite Ponds |
ha |
1,020 |
Harvest Ponds |
ha |
291 |
Recovery of Potassium from feed brine |
% |
78 |
PLANT |
||
Operating time |
hpa |
7,600 |
Recovery of Potassium from feed salt |
% |
80 |
OPERATING AND CAPITAL COSTS |
||
LOM Cash Operating Costs FOB ex-Geraldton port |
A$/t |
$264 |
Mine Gate Operating Costs |
A$/t |
$184 |
Transport and handling |
A$/t |
$80 |
Capital Costs |
A$m |
$237 |
Direct Costs |
A$m |
$177 |
Indirect Costs & Growth |
A$m |
$60 |
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE – LIFE OF PROJECT |
||
Price (FOB) |
US$/t |
$550 |
Exchange Rate |
US$/AUD |
0.70 |
Discount Rate |
% |
8 |
EBITDA |
A$m |
$90 |
Average Annual after-tax cash flow |
A$m |
$64 |
Post tax Internal Rate of Return (IRR) |
% |
27 |
Post tax Net Present Value (NPV) @ 8% discount rate |
A$m |
$381 |
Pre-tax Internal Rate of Return (IRR) |
% |
33 |
Pre-tax Net Present Value (NPV) @ 8% discount rate |
A$m |
$580 |
PROJECT OVERVIEW
Lake Way is located in the Northern Goldfields Region of Western Australia, less than 15km south of Wiluna. The surface area of the Lake is over 270km2.
Salt Lake Potash holds five Exploration Licences (two granted and three under application) covering most of Lake Way and select areas off-lake, including the paleochannel defined by previous exploration. The northern end of the Lake is largely covered by a number of Mining Leases, held by Blackham Resources Limited (Blackham Resources), the owner of the Wiluna Gold Mine.
In April 2019, the Company entered into a binding Split Commodity and Access Agreement (Access Agreement) with Blackham Resources in relation to the development of the Lake Way Project on terms in line with the previously executed MOU announced on 12 March 2018.
Lake Way has a number of compelling advantages which make it an ideal site for Salt Lake Potash’s initial SOP operation, including:
- Access to Blackham Resources’ existing infrastructure (including camps, power and maintenance) to accelerate development.
- The site has excellent freight solutions, being adjacent to the Goldfields Highway, which is permitted for heavy haulage, quad trailer road trains to the railhead at Leonora and then direct rail access to both Esperance and Fremantle Ports, or via other heavy haulage roads to Geraldton Port.
- The Goldfields Gas Pipeline is adjacent to Salt Lake Potash’s tenements, running past the eastern side of the Lake.
- Access to Blackham Resources’ existing Mining Leases provides advanced permitting pathway for early development activity, including the construction of the first phase of Evaporation Ponds (the Williamson Ponds).
- Salt Lake Potash is constructing the first phase of the Evaporation Ponds to enable the Company to commence dewatering from the existing Williamson Pit. The pit contains an estimated 1.2GL of brine at the exceptional grade of 25kg/m3 of SOP. This brine is the ideal starter feed for evaporation ponds, having already evaporated from the normal Lake Way brine grade, which averages over 15kg/m3.
- The high grade brines at Lake Way will result in lower capital and operating costs due to lower extraction and evaporation requirements.
- The presence of clays in the upper levels of the lake which are amenable to low cost, on-lake evaporation pond construction.
SCOPING STUDY CONSULTANTS
The Scoping Study was managed by Wood (formerly Amec Foster Wheeler) and is based on information and assumptions provided by a range of leading independent consultants, including the following consultants who have contributed to key components of the Scoping Study.
Table 3: Lake Way Project Scoping Study Consultants
Area |
Responsibility |
Study Manager |
Wood |
Resource Estimate |
Groundwater Science |
Brine Evaporation |
Ad-Infinitum/ Knight Piesold |
Brine Transfer Hydraulics |
Cardno |
Process Plant: – Design basis/criteria – Process Test Work – Process Plant Design |
Carlos Perucca Process Consulting Saskatchewan Research Council Wood |
Plant Infrastructure |
Wood |
Area Infrastructure |
Wood/Salt Lake Potash |
Environmental & Heritage |
Pendragon Environmental Solutions |
Capital Estimate Compilation |
Wood |
Operating Estimate Compilation (Mine Gate) |
Wood |
Marketing |
CRU International/Argus Media |
Economics |
Salt Lake Potash |
PROJECT GEOLOGY AND MINERAL RESOURCE
Geological Setting
Lake Way is in the Northern Goldfields Province on the Archaean Yilgarn Craton. The province is characterised by granite-greenstone rocks that exhibit a prominent northwest tectonic trend and low to medium-grade metamorphism. The Archaean rocks are intruded by east-west dolerite dykes of Proterozoic age, and in the eastern area there are small, flat-lying outliers of Proterozoic and Permian sedimentary rocks. The basement rocks are generally poorly exposed owing to low relief, extensive superficial cover, and widespread deep weathering.
A key characteristic of the goldfields is the occurrence of paleochannel aquifers. These palaeodrainages are incised into the Archean basement and in-filled with a mixed Tertiary and Quaternary sedimentary sequence.
The paleochannel sediments of Lake Way are characterised by a mixed sedimentary sequence including sand, silts and clays of lacustrine, aeolian, fluvial and colluvial depositional origins. These near-surface deposits also include chemically-derived sediments of calcrete, silcrete and ferricrete. Beneath eastern parts of the playa, there is a deep paleochannel that is infilled with Tertiary-aged palaeochannel clay and basal sands in the deepest portion.
The Sediments infilling the paleochannel are described below:
Lake Bed Sediment
Recent (Cainozoic), unconsolidated silt, sand and clay sediment containing variable abundance of evaporite minerals, particularly gypsum. The unit is ubiquitous across the salt lake surface. The thickness of the unit ranges from approximately 3 to 20m.
The upper part of the unit comprises unconsolidated, gypsiferous sand and silt from surface to around 1.5m depth. The unit is widespread, homogeneous and continuous with the thickest parts in the centre and southern portion of the lake. This is underlain by well sorted, lacustrine silt and clay.
Palaeovalley Sediment
The Paleovalley sediment consists of Tertiary clay and silt that overlies basement or the Basal Sand.
Paleochannel Basal Sand
Tertiary, unconsolidated fine, medium to coarse grained sand interbedded with silt, clay and some lignite horizons.
Mineral Resource
The Mineral Resource Estimate underpinning the production target, classified as Measured, Indicated and Inferred, was prepared by a competent person and was reported in accordance with the JORC Code (2012 Edition) on 18 March 2019.
The Company engaged an independent hydrogeological consultant with substantial salt lake brine expertise, Groundwater Science Pty Ltd, to complete the Mineral Resource Estimate for the Lake Way Project.
The Lake Way Mineral Resource Estimate describes a brine hosted resource. The minerals are dissolved in brine, and the brine is contained within pore spaces of the host sediment.
The Mineral Resource Estimate of 73Mt of SOP calculated using Total Porosity and 8.2Mt of SOP calculated using Drainable Porosity is hosted within approximately 15 billion cubic metres of sediment ranging in thickness from a few metres to over 100m, beneath 189km2 of playa lake surface including the paleochannel basal sand unit of 20m thickness and 30km length.
The Mineral Resource Estimate for Lake Way is divided into resource classifications that are controlled by the host geological units:
- Lake Bed Sediment
- Paleovalley Sediment
- Paleochannel Basal Sands
The mineral resource estimate is summarised in the Tables 4 – 6.
The estimated SOP tonnage represents the SOP within the in-situ contained brine with no recovery factor applied. The amount of contained brine which can be extracted depends on many factors including the permeability of the sediments, the drainable porosity, and the recharge dynamics of the aquifers.
Brines by their nature are not a static resource as they are subject to groundwater movement, dilution and concentration over time. Reporting both total and drainable porosity allows the reflection of this dynamic resource environment, including the consideration of the recharge and physical diffusion impacts on the mine plan and production output.
The impact of the recharge and physical diffusion in the development and long term abstraction of a brine resource is discussed in subsequent sections.
Table 4: Measured Resource
Total Volume |
Brine Concentration |
Mineral Tonnage Calculated from Total Porosity |
Mineral Tonnage Calculated from Drainable Porosity |
|||||||
K |
Mg |
So4 |
Total Porosity |
Brine Volume |
SOP Tonnage |
Drainable Porosity1 |
Brine Volume |
SOP Tonnage |
||
(Mm3) |
(kg/m3) |
(kg/m3) |
(Kg/m3) |
% |
(Mm3) |
(Mt) |
% |
(Mm3) |
(Mt) |
|
North Lakebed (0.4-8.0 m) |
1,060 |
6.8 |
8.0 |
27.6 |
43 |
456 |
6.9 |
11 |
117 |
1.8 |
Williamson Pit |
1.26 |
11.4 |
14.7 |
48.0 |
1.26 |
0.03 |
||||
Total |
6.9 |
1.83 |
Table 5: Indicated Resource
Total Volume |
Brine Concentration |
Mineral Tonnage Calculated from Total Porosity |
Mineral Tonnage Calculated from Drainable Porosity |
|||||||
K |
Mg |
So4 |
Total Porosity |
Brine Volume |
SOP Tonnage |
Drainable Porosity1 |
Brine Volume |
SOP Tonnage |
||
(Mm3) |
(kg/m3) |
(kg/m3) |
(Kg/m3) |
% |
(Mm3) |
(Mt) |
% |
(Mm3) |
(Mt) |
|
Basal Sands (Paleochannel) |
686 |
6.1 |
8.2 |
25.0 |
40 |
274 |
3.7 |
15 |
103 |
1.4 |
Table 6: Inferred Resource
Total Volume |
Brine Concentration |
Mineral Tonnage Calculated from Total Porosity |
Mineral Tonnage Calculated from Drainable Porosity |
|||||||||
K |
Mg |
So4 |
Total Porosity |
Brine Volume |
SOP Tonnage |
Drainable Porosity |
Brine Volume |
SOP Tonnage |
||||
(Mm3) |
(kg/m3) |
(kg/m3) |
(Kg/m3) |
% |
(Mm3) |
(Mt) |
% |
(Mm3) |
(Mt) |
|||
South Lakebed (0.4-8.0 m) |
316 |
6.8 |
8.0 |
27.6 |
43 |
135 |
2.0 |
11 |
35 |
0.5 |
||
Lakebed (8m to Base) |
9,900 |
6.8 |
8.0 |
27.6 |
40 |
3,960 |
60.0 |
3 |
297 |
4.5 |
||
Total |
62.0 |
5.0 |
||||||||||
1 The Drainable Porosity does not include the significant resource potentially available through the recharge cycle.
Mineral Brine Resource Cycle
The production of brine within the lakebed sediment is cyclic and described below.
Stage 1 – Initial Resource
The initial brine resource comprises of two distinct porosity categories:
- Brine dissolved in water held in Drainable Porosity, (11% of the total aquifer volume).
- Brine dissolved in water held in Retained Porosity, (32% of total aquifer volume).
The combined porosity (Total Porosity) then comprises the total SOP brine resource held in the Lake Bed Sediments aquifer.
The remaining volume is occupied by solid material (sand, silt and clay grains comprising approximately 57% of the aquifer volume).
Stage 2 – Production Cycle
During production the brine drains under gravity toward the trench and is subsequently removed by pumping. This creates a hydraulic gradient toward the trench and brine is drawn some distance through the aquifer toward the trench (typically hundreds of meters depending on aquifer permeability).
Over time the aquifer immediately surrounding the trench is partially dewatered. This means that the drainable brine has been removed from the sediment, but the retained brine is still held in place by surface tension.
Stage 3 – Recharge Cycle
Western Australian Salt Lake playas receive water supply from both direct rainfall and surface run-off annually. Direct rainfall lands on the playa each year, and most years, heavy, cyclonic rain events cause run-off from the surrounding catchment onto the lake playa. This water infiltrates the lake playa surface and re-fills the drainable pores in the aquifer. The larger rainfall events usually occur from January through to March.
Stage 4 – Mixing Cycle
The water that has infiltrated and refilled the drainable porosity then mixes (by physical diffusion) with the brine held in retained porosity.
Through repeated production cycles the total brine resource is mined. The concentration of brine pumped from the production trenches will decline over time as the total resource is depleted over repeated production cycles.
The pumping rate is controlled by the hydraulic conductivity of the host sediment. The concentration of produced brine will change over time and will be controlled by the tonnage contained in total porosity and the mechanism of mixing between repeated production cycles.
MINING AND PRODUCTION TARGET
The estimated production target of 200,000tpa of SOP is supported by the total brine production volume of 23GL/year. A numerical groundwater model was developed to predict water level drawdowns due to brine production from trenches in the superficial lake sediments at Lake Way. The model simulates brine abstraction of 19.3GL/year from a trench network. This is supplemented by an assumed volume of 3.7GL/year of brine from the paleochannel delivering a total brine volume of 23GL/year sufficient to support the production target of 200,000tpa of SOP.
Recharge is a key element of the mining strategy, as it refills the drainable porosity and activates salts contained within the retained porosity by physical diffusion. Direct rainfall recharge has been estimated from water level fluctuations due to rainfall and specific yield (Groundwater Science, 2017). Evaporation from water ponded in the Lake was set to 0.7 x (pan evaporation).
Recharge calculations used in the abstraction model were based on historic (1971 – 1990) precipitation at Wiluna and estimated surface inflows (Groundwater Science, 2018) into the lake for a 20-year production period.
Over the life of mine, 80% of the total brine production volume is sourced from the Measured Mineral Resource (Lake Bed Sediment), 16% from the Indicated Mineral Resource (Paleochannel) and 4% from the Inferred Mineral Resource (Lake Bed Sediment – South). The trenches for abstraction of the Inferred component of brine production is expected to be the last of the brine extraction system constructed. Whilst the Company has a reasonable expectation that the portion of the Inferred Mineral Resource included in total brine production will be capable of upgrade, it does not feature as a significant portion of production either during the payback period or during the life of mine.
Brine Extraction
The brine extraction methodology and requirements for the Scoping Study are supported by hydrogeological modelling and hydraulic design work undertaken by Cardno Engineering.
The Scoping Study has assumed brine will be extracted from Lake Way using two methods:
- Surface trenching provides access to brine contained within the playa lake sediments;
- Vertical bores provide access to brine from the paleochannel aquifer.
The design requirements assumed an average brine demand of 730L/s to be supplied to the halite ponds for the extraction network concept design. The contribution to brine production is approximately 84% from trenching and 16% from bores. The current basis is:
- Bore production rate of 8.4L/s/bore
- Trench yield rate (flow) minimum of 4L/s/km
- Trench yield rate (flow) maximum of 8L/s/km
The hydraulic analysis used a conceptual brine extraction network layout and the proposed evaporation pond locations to determine the likely requirements of the on-lake brine transfer pumping scheme.
Brine extracted from paleochannel bores will be fed directly into nearby trenches. Bore pumps have been sized for a flowrate of approximately 8L/s and a pumping head at 90m.
The location and geometry of the paleochannel has been identified from a passive seismic survey. Bores will be drilled using the mud rotary method through the lake bed sediments and the Tertiary clays into the basal sand terminating in the weathered bedrock horizon.
The bores will be screened across the basal sands section. Gravel pack will be installed across the screened section with a bentonite seal at the top, the annulus will be backfilled to surface.
Trench Layout
The trench network designed as part of the Scoping Study stretches a total of 130km across the lake surface and includes two types of trench systems required to maintain the feed brine into the Halite Ponds:
· Extraction trenches provide a low pressure zone for brine contained in the surrounding playa lake sediments to drain into.
· Transport trenches to convey brine into distinct areas as required, and capture brine pumped from the paleochannel bores into the trench network.
Trench Flow
The brine extraction pumping systems must provide sufficient brine to meet seasonal pond demand, which is at a peak during the summer months due to solar evaporation.
A hydraulic analysis was undertaken on a conceptual network layout to calculate flowrates, flow velocities, pump requirements and power demand. Typical industry norms for pumped open channels were adopted, maintaining a minimal trench base gradient of 1:5000 and a maximum flow velocity of 0.3m/s.
Pump stations are located on-lake between trench segments, and at entry points into each halite pond. In total, the trench network includes 12 transfer pump stations.
Trench Design
The trench design provides for approximately a 5m wide trench, with additional width to batter back any surficial loose soils, and from 5m to 6m deep. The trenches will likely be stepped to avoid wall collapse and to assist with constructability. The Scoping Study has assumed a construction methodology using an amphibious excavator.
Trench spoil will be used to create a light vehicle access berm on one side of the trench and include windrows if required. Bunding on the opposite side will be designed with gaps to allow surface water recharge.
The height and layout of the bunds will depend on hydrogeology requirements (i) to ensure regular groundwater recharge from surface water and (ii) to maintain surface water flow of the lake.
Regular trench maintenance will be required and allowance is made in the maintenance equipment fleet for purchase of excavators and constant coverage of personnel on-site to maintain the trench network.
BRINE EVAPORATION
Extracted brine is concentrated in a series of solar ponds to induce the sequential precipitation of salts and eventually potassium-containing salts in the harvest ponds. Based on modelling using historical data obtained from nearby weather stations at Wiluna Township and Wiluna Airport, the Lake Way region in Western Australia has an average rainfall of 260mm/a and an average water evaporation rate of 3,504mm/a, making conditions ideal for evaporation processes.
The operational area of the evaporation ponds required for the final 200,000tpa SOP production rate is 13.08km2, with area distribution between the various ponds based on mass balance modelling output.
The pond sizing is developed from a simulation using a combination of mathematical and thermodynamic models and is based on the average brine chemistry from the lake and paleochannel. The simulation uses average annual weather conditions to calculate the required brine flow and pond area (size) to meet the targeted 200,000tpa production scenario.
Salt Lake Potash engaged Ad-Infinitum to conduct meteorological modelling, evaporation modelling, pond sizing and design for the Lake Way Project. Geotechnical consulting services were provided by Knight Piésold.
Evaporation Pond Chemistry and Configuration
Brine evaporite chemistry is very complex due to the multitude of ions present in brine, however, in an effort to simplify the evaporation pathway representation, a three-component system of the major constituents (Mg-SO4-K) is commonly assumed. Sodium and chloride ions are not shown, for simplicity, as they are generally present in abundance in all salt lake brines and form halite in preference to all other salts.
The extraction brine composition used for the Scoping Study evaporation modelling is based on Lake Way sample data and is detailed below. The average brine composition below is based on an assumed 80% brine extracted from the lake playa and 20% brine extracted from the Paleochannel.
Table 7: Brine Extraction Composition
Element |
Unit |
Value |
Na |
g/L |
74.3 |
K |
g/L |
6.5 |
Mg |
g/L |
7.4 |
Ca |
g/L |
0.5 |
SO4 |
g/L |
26.7 |
Cl |
g/L |
122.8 |
Experience from numerous evaporation trials for Lake Way and Lake Wells has shown that astrakanite does not form, most likely because the kinetics of the formation are too slow for a dynamic pond system. Accordingly, the Scoping Study process has adopted this view and assumed that astrakanite will not form within the pond system. Instead, the composition of the solution will move directly towards the leonite-schoenite field to produce potassium sulphate salts, followed by the epsomite-kainite field where these salts precipitate. Finally, the carnallite field is reached.
Harvest salts from the kainite pond and carnallite pond are used for SOP production. Concentrated brine from the carnallite pond is sent to the bittern pond for additional concentration and store as a waste by-product.
Evaporation Pond Layout
The specific site conditions were reviewed to assess the most suitable evaporation pond locations:
- Halite ponds (1020ha) are located on-lake, to make use of the in situ low permeability clays and avoid the need for HDPE lining.
- Bitterns Pond (14ha) is located on-lake and unlined.
- Kainite (200ha), Carnallite (11ha) and Recovery Ponds (80ha) are located on-lake.
On-Lake Ponds
All ponds are located on-lake providing significant benefits for both cost and operational efficiency. The on-lake evaporation pond system has been located to:
- Avoid locating ponds in areas of high brine yield, to minimise pond footprints sterilising the available brine resource.
- Where possible, avoid low lying areas subject to long periods of inundation resulting from surface water flow. Some ponds that span inundated areas will require specific design considerations.
- Ensure availability of in situ clays beneath the pond footprint, proven to be of low permeability and will limit seepage of unlined ponds.
- Ensure availability of good quality lake clays that are a potential source of embankment construction materials to allow a cut-to-fill method for pond construction.
- Avoid disturbance of the lake edge due to environmental and heritage requirements.
The pond sizes are detailed in Table 8.
Table 8: On-lake Ponds
Halite |
Bitterns |
Kainite |
Carnallite |
Recovery |
|
Area (ha) |
1,020 |
14 |
200 |
11 |
80 |
Evaporation Pond Construction
On-lake construction requires specialist equipment given the challenges trafficking and placing fill on the soft lake surface. Construction material will either be clay sourced from borrow pits immediately adjacent to the embankments, or imported materials source from existing mining waste materials or planned mine pre-stripping.
The general construction methodology is currently being trialled and proven up as part of the first phase of the Evaporation Pond construction currently underway at Lake Way. This will provide important information to ensure an efficient construction methodology is implemented for the remaining pond construction operations at Lake Way.
Salt Harvesting
The harvest ponds have been designed to allow for up to 12 months of salt growth before harvest. Harvests may be made more frequently in the kainite ponds during plant start-up and operation. The carnallite and recovery ponds will also be harvested and salt processed through the plant.
Sulphate salts are to be recovered from the harvest ponds (kainite, carnallite and recovery) by grader and front end loader. Dump trucks are loaded to transport the salt to the process plant, where it is stockpiled in separate areas to allow for a blended feed to the process plant.
PROCESS PLANT
The potassium salts harvested from the solar evaporation ponds will be treated in a processing plant to convert these salts into sulphate of potash (SOP or K2SO4), while minimising deportment of chlorides to the product.
Salt Lake Potash has conducted extensive testing of lake brines and harvest salts from its salt lake projects, predominantly Lake Way and Lake Wells, in order to confirm the evaporation and associated harvested salt processing operations. The testing thus far has proven that lake brine can be concentrated economically, via solar evaporation, to produce mixed potassium sulphate double salts. It has also been shown that these salts, when harvested, can be economically converted into a valuable, high purity SOP fertiliser product.
The SOP production process consists of:
· Attrition to break up crystals
· Conversion of the mixed sulphate salts to schoenite in a sulphate solution at ambient temperatures
· Reverse Flotation to remove chlorides
· Conversion of the schoenite to SOP (in a schoenite solution at around 50°C)
· Filtering, drying and packaging
The key design parameters are shown in Table 9.
Table 9: Design Basis
Parameter |
Value |
Flowsheet configuration |
Feed preparation, conversion, reverse flotation and SOP crystallisation. |
SOP production |
200,000tpa |
Process plant potassium recovery |
80% |
Operating Time |
|
Brine extraction; evaporation ponds and harvesting |
8200h/a |
Process plant |
7600h/a |
Product Composition |
|
SOP Grade |
>96% |
%K2O equivalent |
>52% |
Target Cl Content |
<0.5% |
Target Mg Content |
<0.2% |
The harvested salt is crushed in a roll mill to break up lump material and is further broken down and scrubbed in attritioning cells. The resulting slurry is pumped to the conversion circuit where the potassium harvest salts are converted to schoenite prior to flotation.
The conversion tanks’ discharge slurry is transferred to the conversion thickener, an inclined plate unit. The conversion thickener underflow slurry, now predominantly schoenite, reports to the reverse flotation circuit.
The converted harvest salts still contain an appreciable amount of halite which needs to be removed to minimise chloride and sodium reporting to the product. Therefore a reverse flotation configuration is used employing self-aspirated columns to remove the halite. The resulting halite slurry is filtered, then stockpiled for disposal back on the lake. The flotation product is a Schoenite slurry which is filtered, to remove excess flotation brine, and is presented to the crystalliser circuit. The filtered flotation brine, which is saturated in potassium, is internally recycled with any excess brine sent to the recovery pond.
The purified schoenite salt from flotation is re-slurried with a calculated amount of dilution water and then pumped into the SOP crystalliser which is maintained at 50°C to convert to the schoenite to SOP by dissolving the magnesium sulphate from the double salt. The SOP crystalliser mother liquor reports to a cooling crystalliser where schoenite is precipitated from the liquor by cooling the liquor to 20°C with a chiller system. The secondary schoenite produced by the cooling crystalliser is recycled to the SOP crystalliser along with the primary schoenite from flotation.
The SOP crystalliser produces fine SOP crystals which are first dewatered, then the SOP cake is dried in a rotary drier and then conveyed to the product storage shelter. Product is periodically reclaimed by an FEL and transferred into a loadout hopper for transportation to port.
MAJOR INFRASTRUCTURE
The Lake Way Project is located in the Goldfields region of Western Australia approximately 15km south of Wiluna. The Project is located in close proximity to the Goldfields Highway which is a state highway that extends 800km from south of Kambalda in the Goldfields to Meekatharra in the Mid-West. Given the proximity to the Goldfields Highway which supports quad road trains, road haulage options include either travelling south toward Leonora or west to Geraldton.
The process plant is located 5km from the evaporation ponds and connected by an existing haul road that services the Williamson Pit. A 1.4km haul road from the Williamson pit causeway to the Williamson pond has been constructed as part of the first phase of Evaporation Pond construction. Unsealed access roads will be required for access to the Goldfield Gas Pipeline, raw water borefield and paleochannel bores.
The Project power requirements will be provided by a standalone natural gas power station located near the process plant under a build, own, operate (BOO) arrangement and local diesel generators at remote locations.
The Project requires natural gas for the power station and for process requirements such as the boiler. Natural gas will be supplied from the Goldfields Gas Pipeline which runs along the eastern side of Lake Way. The distance from the process plant to the gas pipeline is approximately 27km.
Water required for the Project will be sourced from a nearby borefield. Raw water will be extracted from the borefield by bore pumps. The total raw water requirement for the Project is 2.0GL/a.
A fly in/fly out (FIFO) workforce has been adopted for the Lake Way Project using the Wiluna Airport which is located 5km south of the main township. A permanent accommodation village with a capacity for 100 workers has been assumed. The village will be expanded to include 180 construction workers during the construction phase.
PRODUCT TRANSPORT AND LOGISTICS
Salt Lake Potash engaged several highly qualified transport logistic companies to assist with defining the optimal logistics solution for transportation of 200,000tpa of SOP from Lake Way to port. An assessment of numerous haulage options was undertaken, applying a fixed origin and modelling multiple potential destinations including Geraldton, Fremantle and Esperance. This assessment has included a road direct assessment, rail direct assessment, and intermodal hub and spoke solution incorporating both road and rail.
The road direct solution to Geraldton has been established as the most cost-effective option to use for the product transport logistics for the standalone 200,000tpa SOP project from Lake Way to underpin the overall economic assessment for the Scoping Study.
The relatively close proximity to the Geraldton Port facilities (780km) and the ability to leverage off the established sealed highway network from Lake Way to Geraldton provides cost effective access into the Geraldton port facility.
The transportation solution will consist of truck loading at Lake Way site via Front End Loader. The transport from Lake Way to Geraldton will be undertaken by trucks suitable for quad combinations. The Mainroads Restricted Access Vehicles (RAV) approvals for quad combination transport covers the entire route from Lake Way all the way into Geraldton Port.
Geraldton Port is capable of handling fully loaded Panamax size vessels up to 70,000 tonnes and 225m in length. The Port handles approximately 19 million tonnes per annum of trade per year with significant excess capacity available for handling and storage.
PRODUCT QUALITY AND MARKETING
Fertilisers consist of essential plant nutrients that are applied to farmed crops in order to achieve favourable quality and yield. They replace the nutrients that crops remove from the soil, thereby sustaining the quality of crops, and are considered the most effective means for growers to increase yields.
The key components of agricultural fertilisers are nitrogen (ammonia and urea), phosphates (ammonium phosphates), and potassium (muriate of potash and sulphate of potash). In addition, sulphate has gained increased attention over the past several years due to soils becoming deficient in sulphur (the ‘fourth macronutrient’).
Global fertiliser demand is expected to increase significantly in the coming years due to the world population growth accompanied by decreasing arable land per capita, changes in diet and growth in income. These increases will provide an incentive for farmers to increase fertiliser use for improved yields and quality.
The most widely available source of potassium used by growers is Muriate of Potash (MOP or KCl), with around 65 million tonnes consumed annually. SOP is a speciality type of potassium fertilisers that is produced and consumed on a smaller scale.
MOP is widely used in all types of farming, however it can be detrimental to some plants, especially fruits and vegetables, due to its chloride content. SOP is primarily used as a source of potassium for crops intolerant to chloride. SOP is priced at a premium to MOP, due to supply constraints, high production costs and because of its ability to be used on chloride intolerant crops (such as fruits, vegetables, beans, nuts, potatoes, tea, tobacco and turf grass), which typically sell at sufficiently higher prices to absorb the premium cost.
SOP can be used in most applications where MOP is used and is preferred in many circumstances as it enhances yield and quality, shelf life and improves taste. SOP generally outperforms MOP in terms of crop quality and yield. SOP performs particularly well with crops that have a low tolerance to the chloride in MOP and in arid, saline and heavily cultivated soils. The low volume of SOP consumption relative to market demand is partly a result of the scarcity of reliable SOP supply.
SOP’s premium to the MOP price is correlated to the conversion costs from MOP to SOP (Mannheim Process) where MOP is used as an input in the process. The premium has been around 60% for the past decade. In recent years, this premium has expanded significantly, as decreases in the MOP price have not translated to similar declines in the price of SOP, indicating that the SOP market is supply constrained.
SOP can be sold as a standard powder, premium granular or soluble product. Granular and soluable SOP generally attracts a price premium. Salt Lake Potash plans to sell at a premium to the market price as a certified organic producer and also with a soluable product offering. The premium achievable for a soluable product can be upwards of 20% (CRU SOP Market Study May 2019).
The Company has engaged Argus Media (Argus) and CRU International Group to provide market analysis on both the broader SOP market and also specifically the Lake Way Project. The current SOP price averages between US$525/t (NW Europe – Standard bulk) (Argus Media 6 June 2019) and US$625 (California) (Greenmarkets 31 May 2019) with Salt Lake Potash utilising a life of mine SOP price of US$550/t (FOB) for the Scoping Study.
The Company will initially be targeting both global and domestic markets for its premium grade SOP product. SOP production is not easily substitutable and is in supply deficit, therefore the Company is confident in the current and forecasted levels of demand.
MINING TENURE
The Lake Way Project site has been secured with a mixture of contractual rights with Blackham Resources under the Access Agreement and Salt Lake Potash’s own exploration and mining tenements and applications. The Company’s and Blackham Resources mineral exploration and mining tenement locations are detailed in Table 10.
Salt Lake Potash is optimising the tenure approval process by staging the required approvals to ensure construction will be undertaken in line with the project schedule.
In addition to the exploration and mining tenements the Company is progressing the approval for various miscellaneous licences for non-process infrastructure, including water and power.
Table 10: Tenure Summary
Tenement |
Status |
Holding Name |
E53/1878 |
Live |
Piper Preston Pty Ltd |
E53/1897 |
Live |
Piper Preston Pty Ltd |
E53/2057 |
Pending |
Piper Preston Pty Ltd |
E53/2059 |
Pending |
Piper Preston Pty Ltd |
E53/2060 |
Pending |
Piper Preston Pty Ltd |
L53/208 |
Pending |
Piper Preston Pty Ltd |
M53/1102 |
Pending |
Piper Preston Pty Ltd |
E53/1862 |
Live |
Kimba Resources Pty Ltd |
E53/1905 |
Pending |
Matilda Operations Pty Ltd |
E53/1952 |
Pending |
Kimba Resources Pty Ltd |
M53/121 |
Live |
Kimba Resources Pty Ltd |
M53/122 |
Live |
Kimba Resources Pty Ltd |
M53/123 |
Live |
Kimba Resources Pty Ltd |
M53/147 |
Live |
Kimba Resources Pty Ltd |
M53/253 |
Live |
Kimba Resources Pty Ltd |
M53/796 |
Live |
Kimba Resources Pty Ltd |
M53/797 |
Live |
Kimba Resources Pty Ltd |
M53/798 |
Live |
Kimba Resources Pty Ltd |
M53/910 |
Live |
Kimba Resources Pty Ltd |
P53/1642 |
Live |
Kimba Resources Pty Ltd |
P53/1646 |
Live |
Kimba Resources Pty Ltd |
P53/1666 |
Live |
Matilda Operations Pty Ltd |
P53/1667 |
Live |
Matilda Operations Pty Ltd |
P53/1668 |
Live |
Matilda Operations Pty Ltd |
ENVIRONMENTAL
Salt Lake Potash has engaged Pendragon Environmental Solutions (Pendragon) and a number of specialist ecological consultants to provide assistance with the necessary approvals for the Lake Way Project.
The Company has identified the key environmental risks for Lake Way Project and has commenced and completed its own studies to obtain the necessary information for the Company to complete environmental impact assessment/referral documentation as required under the Environmental Protection Act 1986 (EPA Act). In addition to the studies commissioned by the Company, the arrangement Salt Lake Potash has established with Blackham Resources has afforded the Company access to an extensive range of environmental studies completed by Blackham Resources across the Lake Way region. Refer Table 11 below for a summary of the key relevant studies completed by the Company and Blackham Resources to date.
The early environmental study information available, has greatly improved the Company’s understanding of the local and regional environment. This has allowed the Company to optimise and de-risk the development to minimise environmental impacts and constraints.
Table 11: Surveys Completed
Report Title |
Area |
Date |
Study Description |
Flora and Vegetation Assessment Lake Way Demonstration Plant Project |
Lake Way and Surrounds |
2019 |
Level 1 and Field Survey |
Demonstration Plant Flood study |
Lake Way |
2019 |
Flood study |
Lake Way Acid Sulphate Soil investigation |
Lake Way |
2019 |
Acid Sulphate investigation |
Lake Way Fauna assessment of proposed project area |
Lake Way and Surrounds |
2019 |
Level 1 and Field Survey |
Fauna Survey |
Lake Way and Surrounds |
2019 |
Targeted Night Parrot Survey |
Lake Way Potash Project Subterranean Fauna Baseline Survey |
Lake Way and Surrounds |
2017 |
Level 1 Baseline survey |
Detailed Flora and Vegetation Survey Lake Way Potash Project |
West of Lake Way |
2017 |
Level 1 |
Lake Way Potash Project Wetland Ecology Baseline Survey |
Lake Way and Surrounds |
2017 |
Level 1 Base line Survey |
Fauna Survey Lake Way Potash |
Lake Way and Surrounds |
2017 |
Level 2 |
Fauna Assessment Lake Way Project Area |
Lake Way and Surrounds |
2016 |
Level 1 |
Flora & Vegetation Survey Lake Way |
Lake and Surrounds |
2015 |
Level 1 |
Matilda Gold Project Murchison Western Australia |
Williamson Pit, Matilda Operations and Wiluna |
2015 |
Level 1 Biological Survey |
Matilda Gold Project Murchison Western Australia |
Williamson Pit, Matilda Operations and Wiluna |
2015 |
Field survey for Landscape Function Analysis Survey |
Biological Assessment of Lake Way 2009 |
Lake Way and Surrounds and E53/1897 |
2010 |
Field Investigation of Lake Way discharge environment |
NATIVE TITLE AND HERITAGE
The Lake Way Project is located in the Wiluna Peoples’ native title determination area (WCD2013/004). The Determination first took effect 23 January 2015, covering an area of approximately 40,665 km2. The determination area includes a number of pastoral leases, parts of the township of Wiluna, parts of the Canning Stock Route, areas of unallocated Crown Land and the Lake Way Project area.
Tarlka Matuwa Piarku Aboriginal Corporation RNTBC (TMPAC) manage the Wiluna Peoples native title rights over their determined area.
In December 2018, the Company signed a Native Title Land Access and Brine Minerals Exploration Agreement (the Agreement) with TMPAC, on behalf of the Wiluna People, covering the Lake Way Project area and providing consent to the grant of its exploration licences and for the area required for the construction and operation of the first phase of Evaporation Ponds.
The Company is continuing extensive consultation with TMPAC to achieve a Native Title Mining Agreement to provide consent to the grant of its mining lease and for the ongoing mining operation. The Native Title Mining Agreement negotiations are advanced and the Native Title Mining Agreement is expected to be finalised and signed in the near future.
The Aboriginal Cultural Material Committee (ACMC) is of the view that Lake Way is an Aboriginal Site for the purposes for the Aboriginal Heritage Act 1972. The Company’s full and ongoing consultation with TMPAC, will enable the Project to take into consideration TMPAC’s heritage requirements. The Company has, with the support of TMPAC, established a framework for obtaining consents under the Aboriginal Heritage Act 1972 necessary to ensure continuity of works on the Lake.
ECONOMICS
Operating Costs
Operating costs have been estimated for the Lake Way Project based on the production rate of 200,000tpa to an accuracy of ±30%.
The estimated cash operating costs were built up by creating cost schedules for the following categories:
Table 12: Operating Costs
Area |
Cost per tonne ($A) |
Labour |
$ 49 |
Power |
$ 33 |
Maintenance |
$ 17 |
Reagents |
$ 3 |
Consumables |
$ 37 |
Miscellaneous |
$ 27 |
General and Administration |
$ 18 |
Total (Operating Costs per tonne) Mine Gate |
$ 184 |
Transportation |
$ 80 |
Total (Operating Costs per tonne) |
$ 264 |
The total operating cash cost estimate of $264/t places the Lake Way Project as the lowest cost producer globally for SOP projects.
Capital Costs
Salt Lake Potash estimates the total capital cost to construct the brine extraction, evaporation and process plant and associated infrastructure to produce 200,000tpa SOP at $237 million.
Table 13: Capital Costs
Area |
$Am |
Brine Extraction |
22 |
Evaporation |
36 |
Process Plant |
75 |
Plant Infrastructure |
20 |
Area Infrastructure |
12 |
Regional Infrastructure |
1 |
Miscellaneous |
11 |
Total Direct |
177 |
Temporary Facilities |
7 |
EPCM |
21 |
Total Indirect |
28 |
Total Bare |
205 |
Growth Allowance |
32 |
Total Initial Capital |
237 |
Royalties, Taxes, Depreciation, and Depletion
The Scoping Study project economics include the following key parameters related to royalties, tax, depreciation, and depletion allowances:
· State Government Royalties are 2.5% of Gross Revenue
· Other Royalties up to 4.9% of Gross Revenue
· Tax rate of 30% is applied
· Depreciation is assumed on a diminishing basis over the life of the assets
Financial Modelling
An economic model has been prepared which reflects the proposed mine life for the Lake Way Project of 20 years. The Scoping Study assumes first production to occur in Q4 2020 with a gradual ramp up to full name plate capacity of 200,000tpa over the year 2021. This assumes completion of the BFS in Q3 2019 and a development timeframe of 12-15 months subject to availability of funding and in accordance with required approvals.
Financial modelling of the Lake Way Project highlights exceptional economic returns with a post tax NPV8 of $381m (pre-tax NPV8A$580m) and a post tax IRR of 27% (pre-tax IRR of 33%). Table 2 provides a summary of production and cost figures for the Lake Way Project.
Payback Period
Payback period for the initial development capital for the Lake Way Project is 3.2 years. The payback period is based on free-cash flow, after taxes.
Sensitivity Analysis
The Scoping Study was prepared at a ±30% accuracy to investigate the technical and economic parameters of a SOP production operation at Lake Way.
The Company has modelled numerous scenarios during the study process to evaluate the impact of key inputs to the Lake Way Project economics. The modelling has highlighted the robustness of the project with the findings detailed in Table 14 and 15 below.
Table 14: Scenario Analysis – NPV
Sensitivities (NPV) |
-20% |
-15% |
-10% |
-5% |
Base |
5% |
10% |
15% |
20% |
Price |
197 |
243 |
289 |
335 |
381 |
427 |
473 |
519 |
565 |
FX |
611 |
543 |
483 |
430 |
381 |
338 |
298 |
261 |
228 |
Operating Costs |
449 |
432 |
415 |
398 |
381 |
364 |
347 |
331 |
314 |
Capital Costs |
420 |
410 |
401 |
391 |
381 |
372 |
362 |
352 |
343 |
Table 15: Scenario Analysis – IRR
Sensitivities (IRR) |
-20% |
-15% |
-10% |
-5% |
Base |
5% |
10% |
15% |
20% |
Price |
19% |
21% |
23% |
25% |
27% |
29% |
31% |
32% |
34% |
FX |
36% |
33% |
31% |
29% |
27% |
25% |
23% |
22% |
20% |
Operating Costs |
30% |
29% |
28% |
28% |
27% |
26% |
25% |
25% |
24% |
Capital Costs |
33% |
31% |
30% |
28% |
27% |
26% |
25% |
24% |
23% |
NEXT STEPS
On the back of the outstanding results from the Scoping Study, the Company has commenced a Bankable Feasibility Study (BFS). Due to the advanced nature of the Scoping Study the Company expects to deliver the BFS within Q3 2019.
Salt Lake Potash is in advanced discussions with a debt provider for a debt funding package which will support funding for the Lake Way Project.
In parallel with work being undertaken on the BFS and utilising experience gained from the construction of the initial Evaporation Ponds, the Company is moving into a Front End Engineering Design (FEED).
For further information please visit www.so4.com.au or contact:
Tony Swiericzuk / Clint McGhie |
Salt Lake Potash Limited |
Tel: +61 8 6559 5800 |
Jo Battershill |
Salt Lake Potash Limited |
Tel: +44 7540 366000 |
Colin Aaronson / Richard Tonthat / Ben Roberts |
Grant Thornton UK LLP (Nominated Adviser) |
Tel: +44 (0) 20 7383 5100 |
Derrick Lee / Beth McKiernan |
Cenkos Securities plc (Joint Broker) |
Tel: +44 (0) 131 220 6939 |
Rupert Fane / Ingo Hofmaier / Ernest Bell |
Hannam & Partners (Joint Broker) |
Tel: +44 (0) 20 7907 8500 |
The information contained within this announcement is deemed to constitute inside information as stipulated under the Market Abuse Regulations (EU) No. 596/2014. Upon the publication of this announcement, this inside information is now considered to be in the public domain.
Forward Looking Statements
This announcement may include forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based on Salt Lake Potash’s expectations and beliefs concerning future events. Forward looking statements are necessarily subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are outside the control of Salt Lake Potash, which could cause actual results to differ materially from such statements. Salt Lake Potash makes no undertaking to subsequently update or revise the forward-looking statements made in this announcement, to reflect the circumstances or events after the date of that announcement.
Competent Persons Statement
The information in this Announcement that relates to Mineral Resources is extracted from the report entitled ‘Significant High-Grade SOP Resource Delineated at Lake Way’ dated 18 March 2019. This announcement is available to view on www.so4.com.au. The information in the original ASX Announcement that related to Mineral Resources was based on, and fairly represents, information compiled by Mr Ben Jeuken, who is a member Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (AusIMM) and a member of the International Association of Hydrogeologists. Mr Jeuken is employed by Groundwater Science Pty Ltd, an independent consulting company. Mr Jeuken has sufficient experience, which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity, which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Salt Lake Potash Limited confirms that it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in the original market announcement and, in the case of estimates of Mineral Resources, that all material assumptions and technical parameters underpinning the estimates in the relevant market announcement continue to apply and have not materially changed. Salt Lake Potash Limited confirms that the form and context in which the Competent Person’s findings are presented have not been materially modified from the original market announcement.
The information in this announcement that relates to Process Testwork Results is extracted from the report entitled ‘Field Trials at Lake Way Confirm Salt Production Process’ dated 29 January 2019. This announcement is available to view on www.so4.com.au. The information in the original ASX Announcement that related to Process Testwork Results was based on, and fairly represents, information compiled by Mr Bryn Jones, BAppSc (Chem), MEng (Mining) who is a Fellow of the AusIMM. Mr Jones is a Director of Salt Lake Potash Limited. Mr Jones has sufficient experience, which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking, to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Salt Lake Potash Limited confirms that it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in the original market announcement. Salt Lake Potash Limited confirms that the form and context in which the Competent Person’s findings are presented have not been materially modified from the original market announcement.
The information in this report that relates to the Process Plant, Non-Process Infrastructure and Capital and Operating Costs are based on information compiled by Mr Peter Nofal, who is a fellow of AusIMM. Mr Nofal is employed by Wood, an independent consulting company. Mr Nofal has sufficient experience, which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity, which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Mr Nofal consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.
SUMMARY OF MODIFYING FACTORS AND MATERIAL ASSUMPTIONS
The Modifying Factors included in the JORC Code have been assessed as part of the Scoping Study, including mining (brine extraction), processing, metallurgical, infrastructure, economic, marketing, legal, environmental, social and government factors. The Company has received advice from appropriate experts when assessing each Modifying Factor.
A summary assessment of each relevant Modifying Factor is provided below.
Mining (Brine Extraction) – refer to sections entitled ‘Project Geology and Mineral Resource’ and ‘Mining and Production Target’ in the Announcement.
Salt Lake Potash has conducted extensive exploration programs across Lake Way involving numerous evaluation methods.
To evaluate the lake bed sediments, sampling and data collation for the exploration field programme comprised extended pumping trials at 5 trenches across the lake for hydraulic parameter determination of drainable porosity and hydraulic conductivity (permeability). Separately, 49 test pits were developed and evaluated to assess variations in geology, brine grade and hydraulic parameters (determined from recovery testing and laboratory testing of in situ samples) across the Lake and 13 auger holes were developed to assess the deeper layers of the lake bed sediments validating the variations in geology and hydraulic parameters.
Salt Lake Potash undertook work in relation to the paleochannel which comprised a volumetric calculation from the geophysics and aquifer parameters and brine grade from the test pumping.
The Company engaged an independent hydrogeological consultant with substantial salt lake brine expertise, Groundwater Science Pty Ltd, to complete the Mineral Resource Estimate for the Lake Way Project. The Principal Hydrogeologist of Groundwater Science, Mr Jeuken, has over 10 years of experience in groundwater resources assessment and management for mining. He has experience in salt lake brine potash evaluation, aquifer testing, wellfield planning and installation for mining, and the development of conceptual hydrogeological models.
Refer to ASX Announcement dated 18 March 2019 for further details on the Mineral Resource Estimate upon which the production target is based.
The hydrological model was produced by the Company in consultation with independent experts. The two methods of extraction outlined in the Announcement are common practice for brine extraction. These extraction methods are used by the three main current operations which include Great Salt Lake in the US, Lop Nur Salt Lake (Luobupo) and SQM in Chile.
Recharge is a key element of the mining strategy, as it refills the drainable porosity and activates salts contained within the retained porosity by physical diffusion. Direct rainfall recharge has been estimated from water level fluctuations due to rainfall and specific yield (Groundwater Science, 2017). Evaporation from water ponded in the Lake was set to 0.7 x (pan evaporation).
Recharge calculations used in the abstraction model were based on historic (1971 – 1990) precipitation at Wiluna and estimated surface inflows (Groundwater Science, 2018) into the lake for a 20-year production period.
Importantly, over the life of mine, 96% of the total production target is in the Measured and Indicated resource categories:
· Lake Bed Sediment (84% of the total production target)
o 80% Measured resource category
o 4% Inferred resources category
· Paleochannel Basel Sands
o 16% Indicated resource category
The Inferred resource included in the total production target is located at the southern end of Lake Way and is expected to be the last of the brine extraction system constructed. Whilst the Company has a reasonable expectation that this portion of the Inferred Mineral Resource will be capable of resource category upgrade, it does not feature as a significant portion of production either during the payback period or during the life of mine.
Processing (including Metallurgical) – refer to sections entitled ‘Brine Evaporation’ and ‘Process Plant’ in the Announcement.
The Company engaged brine-processing experts Carlos Perucca Processing Consulting Ltd (CPPC) and AD Infinitum Ltd (AD Infinitum) and their principals Mr Perucca and Mr Bravo, who are highly regarded international experts in the potash industry. Mr Bravo previously worked as Process Manager Engineer at SQM, the third largest salt lake SOP producer globally. He specialises in the front end of brine processing from feed brine through to the crystallisation of harvest salts. Mr Perucca has over 25 years of experience in mineral process engineering and will provide high-level expertise with respect to plant operations for the processing of harvest salts through to final SOP product. AD Infinitum and CPPC were responsible for the brine evaporation and salt processing components in the Scoping Study.
Lake Way’s process development relied heavily on experience applied by Wood, SRC and specialist consultants (CPPC and Ad Infinitum) who are well experienced from working on similar operations. Production of SOP from lake brines is well understood and a well-established process.
Salt Lake Potash has conducted extensive testing of lake brines and harvest salts from its salt lake projects, predominantly Lake Way and Lake Wells. The testing conducted to date supports that lake brine can be concentrated economically, via solar evaporation, to produce mixed potassium sulphate double salts. It has also been shown that these salts, when harvested, can be economically converted into a valuable, high purity SOP fertiliser product.
In early 2018, modelling of the Lake Way evaporation pathway was completed by solar evaporation experts, Ad-Infinitum. The modelling revealed that the salts produced by solar evaporation were suitable for processing into SOP. The potassium harvest salts were predicted to include leonite (K2SO4·MgSO4·4H2O), schoenite (K2SO4·MgSO4·6H2O) and kainite (KCl·MgSO4·2.75H2O), which are all amenable to the conversion to SOP via the process developed for Lake Wells.
In March 2018, laboratory scale (wind tunnel) evaporation tests were initiated on brine from both the Williamson Pit and Lake Way brine. These tests were compared to the brine evaporation chemistry predicted by Ad-Infinitum showing an excellent correlation to the model. The tests also confirmed the Williamson Pit brine to be a pre-concentrated form of Lake Way brine with similar evaporation brine chemistry.
In April 2018, field evaporation tests were initiated at Lake Way as part of the Lake Way Site Evaporation Trials. These tests consisted of small batch tests designed to duplicate wind tunnel tests at site conditions, and larger batch tests including a specific evaporation rate trial to validate the Ad-Infinitum evaporation modelling.
Three small batch tests were completed in December 2018 using Lake Way playa brine and Williamson pit brine (INT-LY, INT-WP and INT-WP2). Each batch began with a single fill of brine and was subject to evaporation until the brine was exhausted of economic levels of potassium. The volume of brine was moved into progressively smaller ponds throughout the trial and the residual salts were harvested. The harvest salts were homogenised and sampled for analysis and characterisation.
A number of larger batch evaporation tests using larger evaporation ponds were conducted in parallel, and further batch evaporation testing has been continued throughout 2019.
These large batches began with over 100 tonnes of Lake Way playa brine and were operated in a similar manner to the smaller trials. Over 5 tonnes have been harvested from these batch trials. Throughout the trial, brine concentration was monitored and a portion was removed at various concentrations for use in an evaporation rate trial, consisting of multiple class “A” evaporation pans of varying brine concentrations.
The nearby weather station at Wiluna Airport, operated and maintained by the Bureau of Meteorology, provides meteorological conditions to correlate brine evaporation performance for the test work.
Harvest salts from laboratory evaporation tests have been sent to Saskatchewan Research Council (SRC) in Canada to perform a flowsheet testing program for the Lake Way Project. The program’s objective was to verify the suitability of the previous process flowsheet conditions developed for the Lake Wells project. The testing program involved:
· Mineralogical characterisation
· Conversion of mixed harvest salts to schoenite
· Reverse flotation of halite from converted salts
· Crystallisation tests to produce high purity SOP.
It was found that the type of potassium salts present in the Lake Way harvests were similar to Lake Wells (Kainite, Leonite and Schoenite) albeit in different ratios and therefore the process flowsheet remains very similar to Lake Wells. It was also found that potassium was present in both fine and coarse size fractions in the laboratory produced harvest salt sample, therefore finer crushing was required to achieve similar flotation results to Lake Wells. On-going tests are being undertaken on the site generated harvest salt to confirm mineralogy, size fraction and hence crushing size.
The program demonstrated that Lake Way harvest salt can be successfully converted to SOP using the identified process flowsheet, including; attritioning, crushing, conversion, flotation and crystallisation to produce an SOP product of very good chemical quality (>52% K2O equivalent).
Infrastructure – refer to sections entitled ‘Major Infrastructure’ and ‘Product Transport and Logistics’ in the Announcement.
Lake Way’s proximity to the West Australian goldfields means relatively minor area infrastructure upgrades and modifications are required.
The Scoping Study was managed by Wood. Wood is a recognised global leader in potash projects with capabilities extending to detailed engineering, procurement and construction management. Wood are able to leverage an international network, including access to its Centre of Potash Excellence located in Saskatoon, Canada.
Salt Lake Potash engaged several highly qualified transport logistic companies to assist with defining the optimal logistics solution for transportation of SOP to port facilities. The transport cost estimates have been derived directly from transport providers who have extensive knowledge of the Western Australian logistics market.
Marketing – refer to section entitled ‘Product Quality and Marketing’ in the Announcement.
Independent potash market forecasts and assessments were provided by experts CRU International and Argus Media.
These reports emphasised that the specifications proposed by Salt Lake Potash of a K2O content of >52% and Chloride content of <0.1% placed the product into the premium range. The reports confirmed that it would be feasible for Salt Lake Potash to monetise the high level of K2O content in its product relative to the more commonly traded specifications of 50-51% K2O. There is also a market for premium pricing for low chloride content where the chloride content can consistently be produced at levels below 0.5%.
The Company has previously entered MOUs with Mitsubishi Australia Limited and Sinofert Holdings Limited setting out the basis for binding offtake agreements. The Company continues to progress discussions with these parties and others with a view to signing binding offtake and marketing agreements for the future sale of its product.
Economic – refer to sections entitled ‘Economics’ in the Announcement.
Capital Estimates have been prepared by Salt Lake Potash and Wood, a global expert in engineering, using a combination of cost estimates from suppliers, historical data, reference to recent comparable projects, and benchmarked construction costs for Western Australia. Costs are presented in real 2019 terms and are exclusive of escalation. The overall accuracy is deemed to be ± 30%.
Capital costs include the cost of all services, direct costs, contractor indirects, EPCM expenses, non-process infrastructure, area infrastructure, sustaining capital and other facilities used for the operation of the Mine and Process Plant.
Operating costs have been estimated by Salt Lake Potash and Wood. Operating costs are based on a combination of first principles build-up, direct supplier quotes, and experience on similar projects with unit rates benchmarked to costs attributable to Western Australia.
Labour costs have been developed based on a first-principles build-up of staffing requirements with labour rates from bench marks for the Western Australian region.
Government royalties have been assumed at a 2.5% FOB gross revenue basis for the life of the project. Private royalties associated with Blackham Resources and Native Title are up to 4.9% gross revenue depending on the level of brine derived from Blackham Resources tenure.
Royalties account for an average life of mine cost of A$20/t per annum.
Rehabilitation and mine closure costs are included within the discounted cash flow modelling based on 10% of initial development capital and incurred at the end of mine life.
A detailed financial model and discounted cash flow (DCF) analysis has been prepared in order to demonstrate the economic viability of the Project. The DCF analysis demonstrated compelling economics of the Lake Way Project, with an NPV (ungeared, after-tax, at an 8% discount rate) of A$382 million, assuming a LOM Sulphate of Potash price of US$550/t and an (ungeared) IRR of 27%.
The Scoping Study assumes first production to occur in Q4 2020 with a gradual ramp up to full name plate capacity of 200,000tpa over the year 2021. This assumes completion of the BFS in Q3 2019 and a development timeframe of 12-15 months subject to availability of funding and in accordance with required approvals.
Sensitivity analysis was performed on all key assumptions used including price operating and capital costs and exchange rate. The sensitivity analysis highlighted the robustness of the project with the breakeven pricing calculated at US$323/t being a greater than 40% discount to central pricing assumptions.
Payback period for the Lake Way Project is 3.2 years. The payback period is based on free-cash flow, after taxes.
Salt Lake Potash is confident in being able to secure the required funding to develop the Lake Way Project. The Company is in advanced discussions with a debt provider for a debt funding package which will support funding for the Lake Way Project. This is also supported by the recent capital raising of A$20.25m (ASX announcement 6 June 2019).
Environmental – refer to section entitled ‘Environmental’ in the Announcement.
An opportunities and constraints assessment was completed for the Project by Pendragon Environmental, a leading Western Australian environmental management consultancy. Based on the Project’s stage of development, Pendragon Environmental confirmed there are no current impediments on the Project.
To date, Salt Lake Potash has only undertaken preliminary desktop studies for the purposes of identifying potential environmental opportunities and constraints. Extensive data is available across the Scoping Project area from work undertaken historically by Blackham Resources. The further development of the Project may require additional detailed flora, fauna and other studies; this is dependent on the final design criteria.
Social, Legal and Governmental – refer to sections entitled ‘Mining Tenure’ and ‘Native Title and Heritage’ in the Announcement.
The Company has taken legal advice in relation to relevant Modifying Factors.
Material Assumptions
Project Start Date |
Q4 2020 |
|
Cost and Pricing Basis |
2019 Dollars |
|
Currency |
Australian Dollars (unless otherwise stated) |
|
Cost Escalation |
0% |
|
Revenue Escalation |
0% |
|
Scoping Study Accuracy |
±30% |
|
Capex Growth and Allowance |
13% |
|
Mining & Processing |
||
Mineral Resource (Drainable Porosity) |
8.2Mt |
|
Portion of Production Target – Measured |
80% |
|
Portion of Production Target – Indicated |
16% |
|
Portion of Production Target – Inferred |
4% |
|
Trenches (production and transport) – average depth 5m |
130km |
|
Bores – average depth 120m |
14 |
|
Bore Production rate |
8.4L/s/bore |
|
Trench yield rate (flow) – minimum |
4L/s/km |
|
Trench yield rate (flow) – maximum |
8L/s/km |
|
Brine Chemistry (average Lake Brine SOP grade) |
15.2Kg/m3 |
|
Annual Production (steady state) |
200ktpa |
|
Life of mine |
20 Years |
|
Pond Recovery |
78% |
|
Plant Recovery |
80% |
|
Pricing |
||
Sulphate of Potash (FOB) |
US$550/t |
|
Operating Costs |
||
Brine Extraction |
A$23/t |
|
Brine Evaporation & Harvesting |
A$23/t |
|
Process Plant |
A$104/t |
|
Plant Infrastructure |
A$4/t |
|
Area Infrastructure |
A$7/t |
|
General & Administration |
A$22/t |
|
Transportation |
A$80/t |
|
Capital |
||
Brine Extraction |
A$22 million |
|
Evaporation |
A$36 million |
|
Process Plant |
A$75 million |
|
Plant Infrastructure |
A$20 million |
|
Area Infrastructure |
A$12 million |
|
Regional Infrastructure |
A$1 million |
|
Miscellaneous |
A$11 million |
|
Indirect Costs & Growth |
A$60 million |
|
Other |
||
Royalties |
Govt – 2.5% Other – 4.9% |
|
Corporate tax rate |
30% |
|
Discount rate |
8% |
Salt Lake Potash #SO4 – Final Results 2018
AIM and ASX listed company Salt Lake Potash Limited (“SO4” or the “Company”), announces its results for the year ended 30 June 2018.
The Company’s Report and Accounts can be viewed at www.saltlakepotash.com.au.
The Company also advises that an Appendix 4G (Key to Disclosures: Corporate Governance Council Principles and Recommendations) and the 2018 Corporate Governance Statement have been released today and are available on the Company’s website: www.saltlakepotash.com.au/corporate-governance/.
For further information please visit www.saltlakepotash.com.au or contact:
Clint McGhie |
Salt Lake Potash Limited |
Tel: +61 8 9322 6322 |
Colin Aaronson/Richard Tonthat/Ben Roberts |
Grant Thornton UK LLP (Nominated Adviser) |
Tel: +44 (0) 20 7383 5100 |
Derrick Lee/Beth McKiernan |
Cenkos Securities plc (Joint Broker) |
Tel: +44 (0) 131 220 6939 |
Jerry Keen/Toby Gibbs |
Shore Capital (Joint broker) |
Tel: +44 (0) 20 7468 7967 |
The information contained within this announcement is deemed to constitute inside information as stipulated under the Market Abuse Regulations (EU) No. 596/2014. Upon the publication of this announcement, this inside information is now considered to be in the public domain.
OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW
Operations
The Company’s aim is to develop the first salt-lake brine Sulphate of Potash (SOP) operation in Australia, starting with a Demonstration Plant producing up to 50,000tpa of SOP, at the Goldfields Salt Lakes Project (GSLP) located in the Northern Goldfields of Western Australia. The Company’s multi-lake portfolio, and the comprehensive technical achievements to date, highlight the potential for a very economic, large scale and long term project.
Highlights
The Company has undertaken a significant level of work during the year across a range of disciplines and has achieved a number of very important milestones, substantially progressing the Company’s aim is to develop the first salt-lake SOP operation in Australia. Highlights during, and subsequent to the end of, the financial year include:
LAKE WAY
MOU with Blackham Resources to access Lake Way
· The Company entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with Blackham Resources Limited (Blackham) to investigate the potential development of a SOP operation based at Lake Way, near Wiluna.
Pursuant to the MOU with Blackham, the Company would construct an initial pond system to dewater Blackham’s Williamson Pit, which contains approximately 1.2GL of super-saturated brine, with a very high average SOP content of 25kg/m3. These Williamson Ponds would comprise approximately 1/3 of the total Demonstration Plant pond area, and dewatering of the Williamson Pit offers a shorter development time due to its very high grade and salt saturation.
Scoping Study for Low Capex, High Margin Demonstration Plant
· The Company completed a Scoping Study on the development of a 50,000tpa SOP Demonstration Plant at Lake Way that supports a low capex, highly profitable, staged development model, with total capital costs of approximately A$49m and average cash operating costs (FOB) of approximately A$387/t.
The Demonstration Plant is intended to validate the technical and commercial viability of brine SOP production from the GSLP, providing the basis to build a world class, low cost, long life SOP operation across the 9 lakes in the GSLP.
LAKE WELLS
Process Testwork
· The Company completed pilot scale crystalliser validation testwork at a leading crystalliser vendor in the United States, processing approximately 400 kg of crystalliser feed salt (schoenite concentrate), produced from previous Lake Wells development work at Saskatchewan Research Council (SRC). The testwork successfully produced high quality SOP crystals, representative of a full scale plant product.
· The Site Evaporation Trial (SET) at Lake Wells was decommissioned after completing over 18 months of operation under site conditions and through all seasons. The SET processed approximately 412 tonnes of brine and produced over 10 tonnes of harvest salts.
MOU with Australian Potash to study sharing infrastructure and other costs at Lake Wells
· Subsequent to year end, the Company and Australian Potash Limited (ASX: APC) entered into a Memorandum of Understanding and Co-operation Agreement to undertake a joint study of the potential benefits of development cost sharing for each Company’s projects at Lake Wells.
· The Company’s first Mining Lease at Lake Wells was granted subsequent to year end, a significant milestone in the Projects development pathway.
LAKE BALLARD
· An initial surface aquifer exploration program was completed at Lake Ballard, comprising a total of 160 shallow test pits and 10 test trenches. This work provides preliminary data for the geological and hydrological models for the surface aquifer of the Lake, as well as brine, geological and geotechnical samples.
· Subsequent to year end exploration drilling and excavation continued with a view to reporting an initial JORC mineral resource estimate for the shall aquifer.
LAKE IRWIN
· A surface aquifer exploration program was completed at Lake Irwin, comprising 56 shallow test pits and 5 test trenches. This work provides preliminary data for the geological and hydrological models of the surface aquifer of the Lake, as well as brine, geological and geotechnical samples.
REGIONAL LAKES
· The Company undertook initial surface brine sampling of the near surface aquifer and reconnaissance of access and infrastructure at all remaining Lakes held under the GSLP.
GOLDFIELDS SALT LAKE PROJECT
First MOU for an Offtake Agreement with Mitsubishi
· The Company executed its first MOU for an Offtake Agreement with Mitsubishi, for the sales and offtake rights for up to 50% of the SOP production, from a Demonstration Plant at the GSLP, for distribution into Asia and Oceania and potentially other markets.
World Class Scale Revealed with Initial Exploration Target Estimation
· The Company released an initial estimate of Exploration Targets for eight of the nine lakes comprising the Company’s GSLP. The ninth lake, Lake Wells, already having a Mineral Resource reported in accordance with the JORC code.
The total “stored” Exploration Target for the GSLP is 290Mt – 458Mt of contained Sulphate of Potash (SOP) with an average SOP grade of 4.4 – 7.1kg/m3 (including Lake Wells’ Mineral Resource of 80-85Mt). On a “drainable” basis the total Exploration Target ranges from 26Mt – 153Mt of SOP. The total playa area of the lakes is approximately 3,312km2.
The potential quantity and grade of this Exploration Target is conceptual in nature. There has been insufficient exploration to estimate a Mineral Resource and it is uncertain if further exploration will result in the estimation of a Mineral Resource.
Background
The Company is the owner of the Goldfields Salt Lakes Project (GSLP), which comprises nine large salt lakes in the Northern Goldfields Region of Western Australia.
The GSLP has a number of important, favourable characteristics:
· Very large paleochannel hosted brine aquifers, with chemistry amenable to evaporation of salts for SOP production, extractable from both low-cost trenches and deeper bores;
· Over 3,300km2 of playa surface, with in-situ clays suitable for low cost on-lake pond construction;
· The total “stored” Exploration Target for the GSLP is 290Mt – 458Mt of contained Sulphate of Potash (SOP) with an average SOP grade of 4.4 – 7.1kg/m3 (including Lake Wells’ Mineral Resource of 80-85Mt). On a “drainable” basis the total Exploration Target ranges from 26Mt – 153Mt of SOP. [The potential quantity and grade of this Exploration Target is conceptual in nature. There has been insufficient exploration to estimate a Mineral Resource and it is uncertain if further exploration will result in the estimation of a Mineral Resource].
· Excellent evaporation conditions;
· Excellent access to transport, energy and other infrastructure in the Goldfields mining district;
· Lowest quartile capex and opex potential based on the Lake Wells Scoping Study;
· Clear opportunity to reduce transport costs by developing lakes closer to infrastructure and by capturing economies of scale;
· Multi-lake production offers operational flexibility, cost advantages and risk mitigation from localised weather events;
· The very high level of technical validation already undertaken at Lake Wells substantially applies to the other lakes in the GSLP; and
· Potential co-product revenues, particularly where transport costs are lowest.
The Company’s long term plan is to develop an integrated SOP operation of global scale, producing high quality organic SOP from a number (or all) of the lakes within the GSLP, after confirming the technical and commercial elements of the Project through construction and operation of a Demonstration Plant producing up to 50,000tpa of SOP.
Demonstration Plant
The Company believes the advantages of the Demonstration Plant approach are:
· While substantial salt-lake brine production of SOP is undertaken in China, Chile and the USA, it is new in Australia and overseas production models need to be tested and adapted for Australian conditions.
· Proof of concept for SOP production from salt-lake brines in Australia will substantially de-risk the full-scale project, with commensurate improvement in financing costs and alternatives. While the Demonstration Plant does not benefit from economies of scale, it will provide financiers and partners a very reliable cost basis for larger scale, longer term operations, while still being low capex and high margin in its own right.
· Refinement of design and costing of engineering elements at Demonstration Plant scale should result in considerable time and cost savings at larger scale.
· Market acceptance of a new product in conservative agricultural markets is best achieved progressively and in conjunction with existing, established partner(s). It is important to establish Salt Lake’s product(s) as premium, sustainable nutrients in the key long-term markets, and staged production increments are the best way to achieve this objective.
· A Demonstration Plant offers an accelerated pathway to initial production, with limited infrastructure requirements and a faster, simpler approval process. The Demonstration Plant is intended to operate for 12-24 months to establish parameters for larger scale production, and then be integrated into a larger operation. The Company’s objective is to commence construction in 2018, harvesting first salts in 2019, and producing first SOP in 2020.
Lake Way
Salt Lake holds two Exploration Licences (one granted and one under application) covering most of Lake Way, including the paleochannel defined by previous exploration. The Northern end of the Lake is largely covered by a number of Mining Leases, held by Blackham Resources Limited (Blackham), the owner of the Wiluna Gold Mine.
The Company entered into a Memorandum of Understanding with Blackham in March 2018 to investigate the development of an SOP operation on Blackham’s existing Mining Leases at Lake Way, including initially a 50,000tpa Demonstration Plant.
Lake Way is located less than 15km south of Wiluna. The Wiluna region is an historic mining precinct dating back to the late 19th century. It has been a prolific nickel and gold mining region with well developed, high quality infrastructure in place.
The Goldfields Highway is a high quality sealed road permitted to carry quad road trains and passes 2km from the Lake. The Goldfields Gas Pipeline is adjacent to SLP’s tenements, running past the eastern side of the Lake.
Scoping Study
In July 2018, the Company completed a Scoping Study on development of a 50,000tpa sulphate of potash (SOP) Demonstration Plant at Lake Way that supports a low capex, highly profitable, staged development model.
The Demonstration Plant is supported by an Indicated and Measured Mineral Resource (drainable) within the Blackham mining lease area totalling 500,000t (Stored Resource – 2Mt), a multiple of the resource required to support a 50,000tpa Demonstration Plant for 2-3 years.
Table 1: Key Scoping Study Outcomes
Capital Costs (-10% & +30%) |
|
Total Capital Costs Including: – Temporary facilities – EPCM |
A$49m
A$0.4m |
Average Total Cash Cost (FOB) (+/- 30%) |
|
Average Total Cash Cost (FOB) Comprising: – Mine Gate Opex – Transport and handling – Royalties |
A$387/t A$251/t |
Forecast SOP Price: |
A$667/t (US$500/t) |
Study Manager: |
Wood (formerly Amec Foster Wheeler) |
Average Annual Production: |
50,000 tonnes of SOP |
Development Process
The Demonstration Plant is intended to validate the technical and commercial viability of brine SOP production from the GSLP, providing the basis to build a world class, low cost, long life SOP operation across the 9 lakes in the GSLP.
The Company has previously established that larger production volumes (400,000tpa) can result in operating costs in the lowest cost quartile for SOP production globally*. This is principally a result of the economies of scale inherent in the GSLP’s advantageous location in the Northern Goldfields mining district, mostly in the main cost centres of transport, labour and power.
Pursuant to the MOU with Blackham, the Company will construct an initial pond system to dewater the Williamson Pit, which contains approximately 1.2GL of super-saturated brine, with a very high average SOP content of 25kg/m3. These Williamson Ponds will comprise approximately 1/3 of the total Demonstration Plant pond area, and dewatering of the Williamson Pit offers a shorter development time due to its very high grade and saturation.
Process Testwork
The Company undertook a range of process development testwork to enhance the process model for both Lake Way and Lake Wells.
A large scale, continuous Site Evaporation Trial (SET) at Lake Wells was successfully completed over 18 months of operation under site conditions and through all seasons. The results of the SET are an Australian first and have provided significant knowledge to the Company on the salt crystallisation pathway under site conditions in Australia.
The SET processed approximately 412 tonnes of Lake Wells brine and produced 10.3 tonnes of harvest salts. Site-produced harvest salts have been used in a range of subsequent process development testwork programs.
The Company has used the harvest salts produced by the SET to perform comprehensive process development testwork at Saskatchewan Research Council (SRC). Most recently, SRC completed locked cycle testwork that validated the SysCAD process flowsheet and demonstrated that the process converges quickly to operate at steady state.
In addition to locked cycle testing, 1,000kg of harvest salts from Lake Wells SET were processed by SRC to produce approximately 350kg of the flotation concentrate (crystalliser feed salt) which was then provided to a globally recognized crystalliser vendor for crystalliser testwork and equipment design. The tests generated samples with large chrystal size, similar to full scale production, and allowed the vendor to refine the design and pricing of a key process equipment item.
Building on the knowledge gained from the Lake Wells project, a staged engineering approach was used in the process development for Lake Way, whereby initial evaporation modelling was undertaken followed by laboratory tests and then field trials. The initial brine evaporation modelling, conducted by international solar pond experts, Ad Infinitum, indicated that the predicted harvest salts produced at Lake Way are comparable to those produced at Lake Wells (containing a mix of Halite, Kainite and Schoenite) and therefore suitable for conversion into SOP.
Laboratory evaporation tests were conducted by international laboratory and testing company, Bureau Veritas (BV), to validate the evaporation model. BV completed a series of laboratory-scale brine evaporation trials at their Perth facility, under simulated average Lake Way climate conditions. This testwork confirmed the modelled brine evaporation pathways. Furthermore it demonstrated that the Williamson pit brine follows a similar evaporation pathway to Lake Way lake brine with similar brine chemistry and salts produced. This indicates that the Williamson Pit brine is a pre-concentrated version of the Lake Way brine, which provides the advantage of a large volume of brine that is essentially accelerated in the evaporation pathway.
A range of process development testwork to provide and validate inputs to the Lake Way Scoping Study production model was also undertaken, including field evaporation tests and metallurgical processing testwork on harvest salts. The testwork incorporates brines from the Lake itself, as well as the super-concentrated brines from the Williamson Pit.
The results of testwork undertaken to date support the Company’s aim to produce an organic premium SOP product from the GSLP. Salt Lake continues to progress testwork to refine products in line with offtake partner expectations.
MOU for Offtake with Mitsubishi
The Company executed a MOU for an Offtake Agreement with Mitsubishi for the sales and offtake rights for up to 50% of the SOP production from a Demonstration Plant at the GSLP, for distribution into Asia and Oceania and potentially other markets.
Salt Lake Potash is progressing its GSLP development strategy, initially involving construction of a Demonstration Plant producing up to 50,000tpa of high quality SOP, with its plans to distribute production through a small number of global distribution partnerships.
The Mitsubishi MOU is non-binding and sets out the key terms for a subsequent formal Offtake Agreement as the Demonstration Plant is developed. As well as quantities and target markets, the MOU’s other terms include:
· Market pricing and commission mechanisms;
· Specifications and delivery parameters;
· Mitsubishi to provide strategic advice on marketing within the region; and
· The parties to continue discussions regarding funding requirements for the GSLP.
Mitsubishi Australia Limited is a wholly owned subsidiary of Mitsubishi Corporation. Mitsubishi is one of the world’s largest trading and investment enterprises that develops and operates businesses across virtually every industry, including industrial finance, energy, metals, machinery, chemicals, and daily living essentials. Its current activities expand far beyond its traditional trading operations to include investments and business management in diverse fields including natural resources development, manufacturing of industrial goods, retail, new energy, infrastructure, finance and new technology-related businesses.
MOU with Australian Potash
In September 2018, Salt Lake entered into a Memorandum of Understanding and Co-operation Agreement with Australian Potash Limited (ASX: APC) to undertake a joint study of the potential benefits of development cost sharing for each Company’s project developments at Lake Wells.
The Companies’ substantial project holdings at Lake Wells are contiguous with many common infrastructure elements, including access roads, proximity to the Leonora rail terminals, and potential power and fresh water solutions. Both Companies anticipate substantial potential Capex and Opex benefits from some level of infrastructure sharing, with further potential benefits arising from shared or common evaporation and salt processing facilities.
The Companies have agreed to constitute a joint study team to carry out an initial assessment of the merits of infrastructure cooperation. The team will also conduct a high-level review of potential benefits of upstream operational synergies. A substantial part of the Study work will be outsourced to independent engineers and both Companies intend to continue with their independent project developments in parallel with the Study.
The Company’s first Mining Lease at Lake Wells was granted in September 2018, a significant milestone in the Projects development pathway.
Results of Operations
The net loss of the Consolidated Entity for the year ended 30 June 2018 was $11,327,108 (2017: net loss of $9,200,509). This loss is mainly attributable to:
(i) Exploration and evaluation expenses of $8,545,647 (2017: $7,717,231) which are attributable to the Group’s accounting policy of expensing exploration and evaluation expenditure incurred by the Group subsequent to the acquisition of the rights to explore and up to the successful completion of definitive feasibility studies for each separate area of interest;
(ii) Non-cash share-based payment expenses of $1,284,062 (2017: $580,976) which are attributable to the Group’s accounting policy of expensing the value (estimated using an option pricing model) of Incentive Securities issued to key employees and consultants. The value is measured at grant date and recognised over the period during which the option holders become unconditionally entitled to the options and/or rights; and
(iii) Business development expenses of $1,110,578 (2017: $559,247) which are attributable to additional business development and investor relations activities required to support the growth and development of the Goldfields Salt Lakes Project, including travel costs associated with representing the Company at international conferences and investor meetings.
Financial Position
As at the date of this report, the Company had working capital in excess of $4 million which includes cash and cash equivalents.
At 30 June 2018, the Company had cash reserves of $5,709,446 (2017: $15,596,759).
At 30 June 2018, the Company had net assets of $7,019,989 (2017: $17,046,443), a decrease of 59% compared with the previous year. This decrease is a result of the exploration and evaluation activity during the year, which has been expensed as discussed in the results of operations section above.
Business Strategies and Prospects for Future Financial Years
The objective of the Group is to create long-term shareholder value through the discovery, exploration and development of its projects.
To date, the Group has not commenced production of any minerals. To achieve its objective, the Group currently has the following business strategies and prospects:
(i) Complete a PFS for the Lake Way Demonstration Plant;
(ii) Commence construction of the Williamson Ponds at Lake Way and dewatering of Blackham’s Williamson Pit;
(iii) Commence construction of the on-lake infrastructure and Plant for the Lake Way Demonstration Plant;
(iv) Complete a PFS on the Lake Wells Project;
(v) Develop an organic premium SOP product in conjunction with offtake partners and potential customers; and
(vi) Continue additional exploration activities including drilling, test pumping and other testwork across the Company’s multi lake portfolio.
All of these activities are inherently risky and the Board is unable to provide certainty of the expected results of these activities, or that any or all of these likely activities will be achieved. The material business risks faced by the Group that could have an effect on the Group’s future prospects, and how the Group manages these risks, include:
The Company’s exploration properties may never be brought into production – The exploration for, and development of, mineral deposits involves a high degree of risk. Few properties which are explored are ultimately developed into producing mines. To mitigate this risk, the Company will undertake systematic and staged exploration and testing programs on its mineral properties and, subject to the results of these exploration programs, the Company will then progressively undertake a number of technical and economic studies with respect to its projects prior to making a decision to mine. However there can be no guarantee that the studies will confirm the technical and economic viability of the Company’s mineral properties or that the properties will be successfully brought into production;
The Company’s activities will require further capital – The exploration and any development of the Company’s exploration properties will require substantial additional financing. Failure to obtain sufficient financing may result in delaying or indefinite postponement of exploration and any development of the Company’s properties or even a loss of property interest. There can be no assurance that additional capital or other types of financing will be available if needed or that, if available, the terms of such financing will be favourable to the Company;
The Company’s licences may be subject to Native title and Aboriginal Heritage – There may be areas over which legitimate common law and/or statutory Native Title rights of Aboriginal Australians exist. If Native Title rights do exist, the ability of the Company to gain access to the Projects (through obtaining consent of any relevant landowner), or to progress from the exploration phase to the development and mining phases of operations may be adversely affected;
The Company has contractual rights in respect of the Mining Leases on which it plans to build a Demonstration Plant at Lake Way – The Company entered into a Memorandum of Understanding with Blackham in March 2018 that outlines the respective rights and obligations of both parties. The Demonstration Plant will initially be based on Mining Leases held by Blackham and the ability of the Company to proceed with its plans at Lake Way will be dependent on ongoing co-operation with Blackham. The parties intend to formalise arrangements in a Split Commodity Agreement;
The Company’s activities are subject to Government regulations and approvals – Any material adverse changes in government policies or legislation in Western Australia and Australia that affect mining, processing, development and mineral exploration activities, income tax laws, royalty regulations, government subsidies and environmental issues may affect the viability and profitability of any planned development the GSLP. No assurance can be given that new rules and regulations will not be enacted or that existing rules and regulations will not be applied in a manner which could adversely impact the Group’s mineral properties;
The Company may be adversely affected by fluctuations in commodity prices – The price of potash and other commodities fluctuates widely and is affected by numerous factors beyond the control of the Company. Future production, if any, from the Company’s mineral properties will be dependent upon the price of potash and other commodities being adequate to make these properties economic. The Company currently does not engage in any hedging or derivative transactions to manage commodity price risk. As the Company’s operations change, this policy will be reviewed periodically going forward; and
Global financial conditions may adversely affect the Company’s growth and profitability – Many industries, including the mineral resource industry, are impacted by these market conditions. Some of the key impacts of the current financial market turmoil include contraction in credit markets resulting in a widening of credit risk, devaluations and high volatility in global equity, commodity, foreign exchange and precious metal markets, and a lack of market liquidity. Due to the current nature of the Company’s activities, a slowdown in the financial markets or other economic conditions may adversely affect the Company’s growth and ability to finance its activities. If these increased levels of volatility and market turmoil continue, the Company’s activities could be adversely impacted and the trading price of the Company’s shares could be adversely affected.
EARNINGS PER SHARE
2018 |
2017 |
|
Basic and diluted loss per share |
(6.47) |
(6.61) |
SIGNIFICANT CHANGES IN THE STATE OF AFFAIRS
Significant changes in the state of affairs of the Consolidated Entity during the financial year were as follows:
(i) On 18 August 2017, the Company issued 42,000 shares to an advisor as part of their annual fees.
(ii) On 17 November 2017, the Company issued 1,100,000 incentive options to a key consultant as an incentive to attract and retain their services.
(iii) On 1 December 2017, Mr Mark Hohnen retired as a Non-Executive Director of the Company.
(iv) On 22 December 2017, the Company issued 2,300,000 performance rights to key employees and consultants of the Company pursuant to the Salt Lake Potash Limited Performance Rights Plan, and 800,000 incentive options to a key consultant as an incentive to attract and retain their services.
(v) On 12 March 2018, the Company entered a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with Blackham Resources Limited (Blackham) to investigate the potential development of a Sulphate of Potash (SOP) operation based at Lake Way, near Wiluna. Under the MOU, the Company will acquire Blackham’s brine rights and Blackham will acquire gold rights to the Company’s Lake Way holdings, with each company retaining a royalty on their respective holdings.
(vi) On 9 April 2018, the Company announced that it had executed a Memorandum of Understanding with Mitsubishi Australia Limited and Mitsubishi Corporation (Mitsubishi), setting out the basis for the first Offtake Agreement for the Goldfields Salt Lakes Project. The formal Offtake Agreement will provide Mitsubishi with sales and offtake rights for up to 50% of the Sulphate of Potash (SOP) production from a Demonstration Plant at the GSLP, for distribution into Asia and Oceania and potentially other markets.
SIGNIFICANT EVENTS AFTER BALANCE DATE
(i) Announced the results from a Scoping Study on the Lake Wells project which confirmed its potential to produce low cost SOP by solar evaporation of lake brines for domestic and international fertiliser markets;
(ii) On 10 August 2018, the Company appointed Mr Clint McGhie as Company Secretary and Chief Financial Officer following the resignation of Mr Sam Cordin; and
(iii) On 14 September 2018, the Company announced that it entered into a Memorandum of Understanding and Co-operation Agreement with Australian Potash Limited (ASX: APC) to study the potentially very substantial benefits of sharing infrastructure and other costs at Lake Wells.
Other than as noted above, as at the date of this report there are no matters or circumstances which have arisen since 30 June 2018 that have significantly affected or may significantly affect:
· the operations, in financial years subsequent to 30 June 2018, of the Consolidated Entity;
· the results of those operations, in financial years subsequent to 30 June 2018, of the Consolidated Entity; or
· the state of affairs, in financial years subsequent to 30 June 2018, of the Consolidated Entity.
ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION AND PERFORMANCE
The Group’s operations are subject to various environmental laws and regulations under the relevant government’s legislation. Full compliance with these laws and regulations is regarded as a minimum standard for all operations to achieve.
Instances of environmental non-compliance by an operation are identified either by external compliance audits or inspections by relevant government authorities.
There have been no significant known breaches by the Group during the financial year.
DIVIDENDS
No dividends were paid or declared since the start of the financial year. No recommendation for payment of dividends has been made.
DIRECTORS’ INTERESTS
As at the date of this report, the Directors’ interests in the securities of the Company are as follows:
Interest in securities at the date of this report |
|||
Ordinary Shares1 |
Incentive Options 2 |
Performance Rights 3 |
|
Mr Ian Middlemas |
11,000,000 |
– |
– |
Mr Matthew Syme |
4,500,000 |
2,500,000 |
2,000,000 |
Mr Mark Pearce |
4,000,000 |
– |
200,000 |
Mr Bryn Jones |
– |
– |
200,000 |
Notes:
1 Ordinary Shares means fully paid Ordinary Shares in the capital of the Company.
2 Incentive Options means an unlisted share option to subscribe for one Ordinary Share in the capital of the Company.
3 Performance Rights means Performance Rights issued by the Company that convert to one Ordinary Share in the capital of the Company upon satisfaction of various performance conditions.
SHARE OPTIONS, PERFORMANCE SHARES AND PERFORMANCE RIGHTS
At the date of this report the following options and performance shares have been issued over unissued Ordinary Shares of the Company:
· 750,000 Unlisted Options exercisable at $0.40 each on or before 29 April 2019;
· 750,000 Unlisted Options exercisable at $0.50 each on or before 29 April 2020;
· 1,000,000 Unlisted Options exercisable at $0.60 each on or before 29 April 2021;
· 250,000 Unlisted Options exercisable at $0.40 each on or before 30 June 2021;
· 500,000 Unlisted Options exercisable at $0.50 each on or before 30 June 2021;
· 750,000 Unlisted Options exercisable at $0.60 each on or before 30 June 2021;
· 400,000 Unlisted Options exercisable at $0.70 each on or before 30 June 2021;
· 5,000,000 ‘Class A’ Performance Shares expiring on or before 31 December 2018;
· 7,500,000 ‘Class B’ Performance Shares on or before 31 December 2019;
· 10,000,000 ‘Class C’ Performance Shares on or before 12 June 2020;
· 1,350,000 Performance Rights subject to the PFS Milestone expiring on 31 December 2018;
· 1,350,000 Performance Rights subject to the BFS Milestone expiring on 31 December 2019;
· 1,350,000 Performance Rights subject to the Construction Milestone expiring on 30 June 2020; and
· 1,350,000 Performance Rights subject to the Production Milestone expiring on 30 June 2021.
During the year ended 30 June 2018, no Ordinary Shares have been issued as a result of the exercise of Unlisted Options, and no Ordinary Shares have been issued as a result of the conversion of Performance Shares or Rights. Subsequent to year end and until the date of this report, no Ordinary Shares have been issued as a result of the exercise of Unlisted Options.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF PROFIT OR LOSS AND OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2018
30 June 2018 |
30 June 2017 |
||
Notes |
$ |
$ |
|
Finance income |
3 |
238,208 |
123,477 |
Other income |
4 |
456,709 |
604,468 |
Exploration and evaluation expenses |
(8,545,647) |
(7,717,231) |
|
Corporate and administrative expenses |
(1,081,738) |
(1,071,000) |
|
Business development expenses |
(1,110,578) |
(559,247) |
|
Share based payment expense |
5 |
(1,284,062) |
(580,976) |
Loss before tax |
(11,327,108) |
(9,200,509) |
|
Income tax expense |
6 |
– |
– |
Loss for the year |
(11,327,108) |
(9,200,509) |
|
Other comprehensive income Items that may be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss: |
|||
Foreign currency translation differences reclassified to profit or loss on disposal of controlled entity |
– |
(454,468) |
|
Other comprehensive loss for the year, net of tax |
– |
(454,468) |
|
Total comprehensive loss for the year |
(11,327,108) |
(9,654,977) |
|
Basic and diluted loss per share attributable to the ordinary equity holders of the company (cents per share) |
16 |
(6.47) |
(6.61) |
The above Consolidated Statement of Profit or Loss and other Comprehensive Income should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION
AS AT 30 JUNE 2018
Notes |
30 June 2018 |
30 June 2017 |
|
ASSETS |
|||
Current Assets |
|||
Cash and cash equivalents |
7 |
5,709,446 |
15,596,759 |
Trade and other receivables |
8 |
227,273 |
300,058 |
Total Current Assets |
5,936,719 |
15,896,817 |
|
Non-Current Assets |
|||
Property, plant and equipment |
9 |
535,344 |
303,511 |
Exploration and evaluation expenditure |
10 |
2,276,736 |
2,276,736 |
Total Non-Current Assets |
2,812,080 |
2,580,247 |
|
TOTAL ASSETS |
8,748,799 |
18,477,064 |
|
LIABILITIES |
|||
Current Liabilities |
|||
Trade and other payables |
11 |
1,620,527 |
1,348,791 |
Finance lease |
11,829 |
13,011 |
|
Provisions |
12 |
57,462 |
19,181 |
Total Current Liabilities |
1,689,818 |
1,380,983 |
|
Non-Current Liabilities |
|||
Finance lease |
38,992 |
49,638 |
|
Total Non-Current Liabilities |
38,992 |
49,638 |
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES |
1,728,810 |
1,430,621 |
|
NET ASSETS |
7,019,989 |
17,046,443 |
|
EQUITY |
|||
Contributed equity |
13 |
123,501,153 |
123,484,561 |
Reserves |
14 |
2,105,886 |
821,824 |
Accumulated losses |
(118,587,050) |
(107,259,942) |
|
TOTAL EQUITY |
7,019,989 |
17,046,443 |
The above Consolidated Statement of Financial Position should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2018
Contributed Equity |
Share- Based Payment Reserve |
Foreign Currency Translation Reserve |
Accumulated Losses |
Total Equity |
|
$ |
$ |
$ |
$ |
$ |
|
Balance at 1 July 2017 |
123,484,561 |
821,824 |
– |
(107,259,942) |
17,046,443 |
Net loss for the year |
– |
– |
– |
(11,327,108) |
(11,327,108) |
Total comprehensive loss for the year |
– |
– |
– |
(11,327,108) |
(11,327,108) |
Shares issued in lieu of fees |
18,476 |
– |
– |
– |
18,476 |
Share issue costs |
(1,884) |
– |
– |
– |
(1,884) |
Share based payment expense |
– |
1,284,062 |
– |
– |
1,284,062 |
Balance at 30 June 2018 |
123,501,153 |
2,105,886 |
– |
(118,587,050) |
7,019,989 |
Balance at 1 July 2016 |
106,761,669 |
240,848 |
454,468 |
(98,059,433) |
9,397,552 |
Net loss for the year |
– |
– |
– |
(9,200,509) |
(9,200,509) |
Exchange differences reclassified to profit or loss on disposal of controlled entity |
– |
– |
(454,468) |
– |
(454,468) |
Total comprehensive loss for the year |
– |
– |
(454,468) |
(9,200,509) |
(9,654,977) |
Shares issued in lieu of fees |
86,400 |
– |
– |
– |
86,400 |
Share placement |
17,630,000 |
– |
– |
– |
17,630,000 |
Share issue costs |
(993,508) |
– |
– |
– |
(993,508) |
Share based payment expense |
– |
580,976 |
– |
– |
580,976 |
Balance at 30 June 2017 |
123,484,561 |
821,824 |
– |
(107,259,942) |
17,046,443 |
The above Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2018
Note |
30 June 2018 |
30 June 2017 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities |
|||
Payments to suppliers and employees |
(10,275,823) |
(8,657,842) |
|
Exploration investment scheme received |
30,000 |
120,000 |
|
R&D tax incentive |
456,709 |
– |
|
Interest received |
242,852 |
114,423 |
|
Net cash outflow from operating activities |
15(a) |
(9,546,262) |
(8,423,419) |
Cash flows from investing activities |
|||
Payments for property, plant and equipment |
(256,890) |
(162,675) |
|
Net cash outflow from investing activities |
(256,890) |
(162,675) |
|
Cash flows from financing activities |
|||
Proceeds from issue of shares |
– |
17,630,000 |
|
Lease payments |
(11,829) |
– |
|
Transaction costs from issue of shares |
(72,332) |
(945,448) |
|
Net cash inflow/(outflow) from financing activities |
(84,161) |
16,684,552 |
|
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents held |
(9,887,313) |
8,098,458 |
|
Net foreign exchange differences |
– |
16 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year |
15,596,759 |
7,498,285 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year |
15(b) |
5,709,446 |
15,596,759 |
The above Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.
NOTES TO AND FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2018
1. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The significant accounting policies adopted in preparing the financial report of Salt Lake Potash Limited (Salt Lake or Company) and its consolidated entities (Consolidated Entity or Group) for the year ended 30 June 2018 are stated to assist in a general understanding of the financial report.
Salt Lake is a Company limited by shares incorporated and domiciled in Australia whose shares are publicly traded on the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX), and the AIM Market (AIM) of the London Stock Exchange.
The financial report of the Group for the year ended 30 June 2018 was authorised for issue in accordance with a resolution of the Directors on 26 September 2018.
(a) Basis of Preparation
The financial report is a general purpose financial report, which has been prepared in accordance with Australian Accounting Standards (“AASBs”) and other authoritative pronouncements of the Australian Accounting Standards Board (“AASB”) and the Corporations Act 2001. The Group is a for-profit entity for the purposes of preparing the consolidated financial statements.
The financial report has been prepared on a historical cost basis. The financial report is presented in Australian dollars.
Going concern
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis which assumes the continuity of normal business activity and the realisation of assets and the settlement of liabilities in the ordinary course of business.
For the year ended 30 June 2018, the Consolidated Entity incurred a net loss of $11,327,108 (2017: $9,654,977) and experienced net cash outflows from operating and investing activities of $9,821,628 (2017: $8,586,094). As at 30 June 2018, the Group had cash and cash equivalents of $5,709,446 (2017: $15,596,759) and net current assets of $4,246,901 (2017: $14,515,834).
The Company has recently completed a successful Scoping Study for the Lake Way Demonstration Plant and is currently in the process of finalising parameters for the Pre-Feasibility Study and construction of holding ponds to dewater Blackham’s Williamson Pit. The Scoping Study on the development of a 50,000tpa sulphate of potash (SOP) Demonstration Plant at Lake Way supports a low capex, highly profitable, staged development model. In order to continue to progress the Demonstration Plant at Lake Way and ongoing studies for the wider GSLP, the Company will be required to raise additional capital during the current financial year.
Based on the successful results of the Scoping Study and having previously raised funds for the GSLP, the Directors are confident that they will be able to raise additional capital as and when required to continue to fund operations. In addition, the Directors have been involved in a number of recent successful capital raisings for other listed resource companies, and accordingly, they are satisfied that they will be able to raise additional capital when required to enable the Consolidated Entity to meet its obligations as and when they fall due, and accordingly, consider that it is appropriate to prepare the financial statements on the going concern basis.
Should the Consolidated Entity be unable to raise additional capital as and when required, the Consolidated Entity would need to reduce operational expenditure to continue as a going concern. In the event that the Consolidated Entity is unable to achieve the matters referred to above, uncertainty would exist that may cast doubt on the ability of the Consolidated Entity to continue as a going concern.
These consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts, or to the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Consolidated Entity be unable to continue as a going concern.
(b) Statement of Compliance
The financial report complies with Australian Accounting Standards and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board.
In the current year, the Group has adopted all of the new and revised Standards and Interpretations issued by the AASB that are relevant to its operations and effective for the current annual reporting period.
New and revised standards and amendments thereof and interpretations effective for the current reporting period that are relevant to the Group include:
· AASB 2016-1 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards – Recognition of Deferred Tax Assets for Unrealised Losses which clarify that the existence of a deductible temporary difference depends solely on a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset and its tax base at the end of the reporting period, and is not effected by possible future changes in the carrying amount or expected manner of recovery of the asset;
· AASB 2016-2 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards – Disclosure Initiative: Amendments to AASB 107 which amend existing presentation and disclosure requirements to evaluate changes in liabilities arising from financing activities, including both changes arising from cash flows and non-cash changes; and
· AASB 2017-2 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards – Further Annual Improvements 2016-2016 Cycle which clarify the existing disclosure requirements and scope of AASB 12 Disclosure of Interest in Other Entities to apply to interests that are classified as held for sale or distribution.
The adoption of these new and revised standards has not resulted in any significant changes to the Group’s accounting policies or to the amounts reported for the current or prior periods.
Australian Accounting Standards and Interpretations that have recently been issued or amended but are not yet effective have not been adopted by the Group for the annual reporting period ended 30 June 2018. Those which may be relevant to the Group are set out in the table below.
Standard/Interpretation |
Application date of standard |
Application date for Group |
AASB 9 Financial Instruments, and relevant amending standards |
1 January 2018 |
1 July 2018 |
AASB 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers, and relevant amending standards |
1 January 2018 |
1 July 2018 |
AASB 2016-5 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards – Classification and Measurement of Share-based Payment Transactions |
1 January 2018 |
1 July 2018 |
AASB Interpretation 22 Foreign Currency Transactions and Advance Consideration |
1 January 2018 |
1 July 2018 |
AASB 16 Leases |
1 January 2019 |
1 July 2019 |
Management has reviewed the requirements of these accounting standards and has assessed that these will not have any significant impact on the Group’s financial statements based on the following:
· At 30 June 2018, the Group’s only financial assets and liabilities are cash, receivables, finance lease and payables for which no significant measurement changes have been introduced under AASB 9. The changes to the impairment model are not anticipated to have an impact on the Group as receivables are primarily comprised of GST and interest;
· The Group does not currently have any revenue contracts and accordingly AASB 15 is not expected to have an impact on the Group’s results; and
· The Group’s main operating lease is for office space, currently at a cost of $10,170 per month. Under AASB 16, an asset (the right to use the leased item) and a financial liability to pay rentals will be recognised. AASB 16 will not apply to short term contracts of less than 12 months.
(c) Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements incorporate the assets and liabilities of all subsidiaries of the Company as at 30 June 2018 and the results of all subsidiaries for the year then ended.
Subsidiaries are all entities (including structured entities) over which the group has control. The group controls an entity when the group is exposed to, or has rights to, variable returns from its involvement with the entity and has the ability to affect those returns through its power to direct the activities of the entity.
The financial statements of the subsidiaries are prepared for the same reporting period as the Company, using consistent accounting policies. Accounting policies of subsidiaries have been changed where necessary to ensure consistency with the policies adopted by the Company.
Subsidiaries are fully consolidated from the date on which control is transferred to the Company. They are de-consolidated from the date that control ceases. Intercompany transactions and balances, income and expenses and profits and losses between Group companies, are eliminated.
(d) Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, deposits held at call with banks and other short-term highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less.
(e) Trade and Other Receivables
Trade receivables are recognised and carried at the original invoice amount less a provision for any uncollectable debts. An estimate for doubtful debts is made when collection of the full amount is no longer probable. Bad debts are written‑off as incurred.
Short term receivables from related parties are recognised and carried at the nominal amount due and are interest free.
(f) Investments and Other Financial Assets
(i) Classification
Financial assets in the scope of AASB 139 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement are classified as either financial assets at fair value through profit or loss, loans and receivables, held-to-maturity investments, or available-for-sale investments, as appropriate. When financial assets are recognised initially they are measured at fair value, plus, in the case of investments not at fair value through profit or loss, directly attributable transaction costs. The Group determines the classification of its financial assets after initial recognition and, when allowed and appropriate, re-evaluates this designation at each financial year-end.
Loans and receivables are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market. They arise when the Group provides money, goods or services directly to a debtor with no intention of selling the receivable. They are included in current assets, except for those with maturities greater than twelve months after the reporting date which are classified as non-current assets. Loans and receivables are included in receivables in the statement of financial position.
Loans and receivables are carried at amortised cost using the effective interest rate method.
(ii) Impairment
Collectability of trade and other receivables is reviewed on an ongoing basis. Individual debts that are known to be uncollectible are written off when identified. An impairment allowance is recognised when there is objective evidence that the Consolidated Entity will not be able to collect the receivable. Financial difficulties of the debtor, default payments or debts more than 60 days overdue are considered objective evidence of impairment. The amount of the impairment loss is the receivable carrying amount compared to the present value of estimated future cash flows, discounted at the original effective interest rate.
(g) Property, Plant and Equipment
(i) Recognition and measurement
All classes of property, plant and equipment are measured at historical cost.
Plant and equipment is stated at historical cost less accumulated depreciation and any accumulated impairment losses. Such cost includes the cost of replacing parts that are eligible for capitalisation when the cost of replacing the parts is incurred. Similarly, when each major inspection is performed, its cost is recognised in the carrying amount of the plant and equipment as a replacement only if it is eligible for capitalisation. All other repairs and maintenance are recognised in the Statement of Profit or Loss and other Comprehensive Income as incurred.
(ii) Depreciation and Amortisation
Depreciation is provided on a straight line basis on all property, plant and equipment.
2018 |
2017 |
|
Major depreciation and amortisation periods are: |
||
Plant and equipment: |
22%- 40% |
22%- 40% |
The assets’ residual values, useful lives and amortisation methods are reviewed, and adjusted if appropriate, at each financial year end.
(iii) Derecognition
An item of property, plant and equipment is derecognised upon disposal or when no further future economic benefits are expected from its use or disposal.
(h) Exploration and Development Expenditure
Expenditure on exploration and evaluation is accounted for in accordance with the ‘area of interest’ method.
Exploration and evaluation expenditure encompasses expenditures incurred by the Group in connection with the exploration for and evaluation of mineral resources before the technical feasibility and commercial viability of extracting a mineral resource are demonstrable.
For each area of interest, expenditure incurred in the acquisition of rights to explore is capitalised, classified as tangible or intangible, and recognised as an exploration and evaluation asset. Exploration and evaluation assets are measured at cost at recognition and are recorded as an asset if:
a. the rights to tenure of the area of interest are current; and
b. at least one of the following conditions is also met:
· the exploration and evaluation expenditures are expected to be recouped through successful development and exploitation of the area of interest, or alternatively, by its sale; and
· exploration and evaluation activities in the area of interest have not at the reporting date reached a stage which permits a reasonable assessment of the existence or otherwise of economically recoverable reserves, and active and significant operations in, or in relation to, the area of interest are continuing.
Exploration and evaluation expenditure incurred by the Group subsequent to acquisition of the rights to explore is expensed as incurred, up to costs associated with the preparation of a feasibility study.
(i) Impairment
Capitalised exploration costs are reviewed each reporting date to establish whether an indication of impairment exists. If any such indication exists, the recoverable amount of the capitalised exploration costs is estimated to determine the extent of the impairment loss (if any). Where an impairment loss subsequently reverses, the carrying amount of the asset is increased to the revised estimate of its recoverable amount, but only to the extent that the increased carrying amount does not exceed the carrying amount that would have been determined had no impairment loss been recognised for the asset in previous years.
Where a decision is made to proceed with development, accumulated expenditure is tested for impairment and transferred to development properties, and then amortised over the life of the reserves associated with the area of interest once mining operations have commenced. Recoverability of the carrying amount of the exploration and evaluation assets is dependent on successful development and commercial exploitation, or alternatively, sale of the respective areas of interest.
(i) Payables
Liabilities are recognised for amounts to be paid in the future for goods and services received. Trade accounts payable are normally settled within 60 days. Payables are carried at amortised cost.
(j) Provisions
Provisions are recognised when the group has a legal or constructive obligation, as a result of past events, for which it is probable that an outflow of economic benefits will result and that outflow can be reliably measured.
(k) Revenue Recognition
Revenue is measured at the fair value of the consideration received or receivable.
Interest income
Interest revenue is recognised on a time proportionate basis that takes into account the effective yield on the financial assets.
(l) Income Tax
The income tax expense for the period is the tax payable on the current period’s taxable income based on the national income tax rate for each jurisdiction adjusted by changes in deferred tax assets and liabilities attributable to temporary differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts in the financial statements, and to unused tax losses.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognised for temporary differences at the tax rates expected to apply when the assets are recovered or liabilities are settled, based on those tax rates which are enacted or substantively enacted for each jurisdiction. The relevant tax rates are applied to the cumulative amounts of deductible and taxable temporary differences to measure the deferred tax asset or liability. An exception is made for certain temporary differences arising from the initial recognition of an asset or a liability. No deferred tax asset or liability is recognised in relation to these temporary differences if they arose on goodwill or in a transaction, other than a business combination, that at the time of the transaction did not affect either accounting profit or taxable profit or loss.
Deferred tax liabilities and assets are not recognised for temporary differences between the carrying amount and tax bases of investments in controlled entities where the Company is able to control the timing of the reversal of the temporary differences and it is probable that the differences will not reverse in the foreseeable future.
Deferred tax assets are recognised for deductible temporary differences and unused tax losses only if it is probable that future taxable amounts will be available to utilise those temporary differences and losses.
The carrying amount of deferred income tax assets is reviewed at each reporting date and reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable that sufficient taxable profit will be available to allow all or part of the deferred income tax asset to be utilised.
Unrecognised deferred income tax assets are reassessed at each balance date and are recognised to the extent that it has become probable that future taxable profit will allow the deferred tax asset to be recovered.
Current and deferred tax balances attributable to amounts recognised directly in equity are also recognised directly in equity.
Deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities are offset only if a legally enforceable right exists to set off current tax assets against tax liabilities and the deferred tax liabilities relate to the same taxable entity and the same taxation authority.
Tax consolidation
Salt Lake Potash Limited and its wholly-owned Australian subsidiaries have formed an income tax consolidated group under the tax consolidation regime. Each entity in the group recognises its own current and deferred tax liabilities, except for any deferred tax assets resulting from unused tax losses and tax credits, which are immediately assumed by the Company. The current tax liability of each group entity is then subsequently assumed by the Company. The tax consolidated group has entered a tax sharing agreement whereby each company in the Group contributes to the income tax payable in proportion to their contribution to the net profit before tax of the tax consolidated group.
(m) Employee Entitlements
Provision is made for the Group’s liability for employee benefits arising from services rendered by employees to balance date. Employee benefits that are expected to be settled within 12 months have been measured at the amounts expected to be paid when the liability is settled, plus related on-costs. Employee benefits expected to be settled more later than 12 months after the year end have been measured at the present value of the estimated future cash outflows to be made for those benefits.
(n) Earnings per Share
Basic earnings per share (EPS) is calculated by dividing the net profit attributable to members of the Company for the reporting period, after excluding any costs of servicing equity, by the weighted average number of Ordinary Shares of the Company, adjusted for any bonus issue.
Diluted EPS is calculated by dividing the basic EPS earnings, adjusted by the after tax effect of financing costs associated with dilutive potential Ordinary Shares and the effect on revenues and expenses of conversion to Ordinary Shares associated with dilutive potential Ordinary Shares, by the weighted average number of Ordinary Shares and dilutive Ordinary Shares adjusted for any bonus issue.
(o) Goods and Services Tax
Revenues, expenses and assets are recognised net of the amount of GST, except where the amount of GST incurred is not recoverable from the Australian Tax Office. In these circumstances the GST is recognised as part of the cost of acquisition of the asset or as part of the expense. Receivables and payables in the statement of financial position are shown inclusive of GST.
Cash flows are presented in the cash flow statement on a gross basis, except for the GST component of investing and financing activities, which are disclosed as operating cash flows.
(p) Acquisition of Assets
A group of assets may be acquired in a transaction which is not a business combination. In such cases the cost of the group is allocated to the individual identifiable assets (including intangible assets that meet the definition of and recognition criteria for intangible assets in AASB 138) acquired and liabilities assumed on the basis of their relative fair values at the date of purchase.
(q) Impairment of Non-Current Assets
The Group assesses at each reporting date whether there is an indication that a non-current asset may be impaired. If any such indication exists, or when annual impairment testing for an asset is required, the Group makes an estimate of the asset’s recoverable amount. An asset’s recoverable amount is the higher of its fair value less costs of disposal and its value in use and is determined for an individual asset, unless the asset does not generate cash inflows that are largely independent of those from other assets or groups of assets and the asset’s value in use cannot be estimated to be close to its fair value. In such cases the asset is tested for impairment as part of the cash-generating unit to which it belongs. When the carrying amount of an asset or cash-generating unit exceeds its recoverable amount, the asset or cash-generating unit is considered impaired and is written down to its recoverable amount.
In assessing the value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset.
An assessment is also made at each reporting date as to whether there is any indication that previously recognised impairment losses may no longer exist or may have decreased. If such indication exists, the recoverable amount is estimated. A previously recognised impairment loss is reversed only if there has been a change in the estimates used to determine the asset’s recoverable amount since the last impairment loss was recognised. If that is the case the carrying amount of the asset is increased to its recoverable amount. That increased amount cannot exceed the carrying amount that would have been determined, net of depreciation, had no impairment loss been recognised for the asset in prior years. Such reversal is recognised in profit or loss. After such a reversal the depreciation charge is adjusted in future periods to allocate the asset’s revised carrying amount, less any residual value, on a systematic basis over its remaining useful life.
(r) Issued and Unissued Capital
Ordinary Shares are classified as equity. Issued and paid up capital is recognised at the fair value of the consideration received by the Company.
Incremental costs directly attributable to the issue of new shares or options are shown in equity as a deduction, net of tax, from the proceeds.
(s) Foreign Currencies
(i) Functional and presentation currency
The functional currency of each of the Group’s entities is measured using the currency of the primary economic environment in which that entity operates. The consolidated financial statements are presented in Australian dollars which is the Company’s functional and presentation currency.
(ii) Transactions and balances
Foreign currency transactions are translated into functional currency using the exchange rates prevailing at the date of the transaction. Foreign currency monetary items are translated at the year-end exchange rate. Non-monetary items measured at historical cost continue to be carried at the exchange rate at the date of the transaction.
Exchange differences arising on the translation of monetary items are recognised in the Statement Profit or Loss and other Comprehensive Income, except where deferred in equity as a qualifying cash flow or net investment hedge.
Exchange differences arising on the translation of non-monetary items are recognised directly in equity to the extent that the gain or loss is directly recognised in equity, otherwise the exchange difference is recognised in the other Comprehensive Income.
(iii) Group companies
The financial results and position of foreign operations whose functional currency is different from the Group’s presentation currency are translated as follows:
· assets and liabilities are translated at year-end exchange rates prevailing at that reporting date;
· income and expenses are translated at average exchange rates for the period; and
· items of equity are translated at the historical exchange rates prevailing at the date of the transaction.
Exchange differences arising on translation of foreign operations are transferred directly to the group’s foreign currency translation reserve in the statement of financial position. These differences are recognised in the Statement of Profit or Loss and other Comprehensive Income in the period in which the operation is disposed.
(t) Share-Based Payments
Equity-settled share-based payments are provided to officers, employees, consultants and other advisors. These share-based payments are measured at the fair value of the equity instrument at the grant date. Fair value is determined using the Binomial option pricing model. Further details on how the fair value of equity-settled share based payments has been determined can be found in Note 20.
The fair value determined at the grant date is expensed on a straight-line basis over the vesting period, based on the Company’s estimate of equity instruments that will eventually vest. At each reporting date, the Company revises its estimate of the number of equity instruments expected to vest. The impact of the revision of the original estimates, if any, is recognised in profit or loss over the remaining vesting period, with a corresponding adjustment to the share based payments reserve.
Equity-settled share-based payments may also be provided as consideration for the acquisition of assets. Where Ordinary Shares are issued, the transaction is recorded at fair value based on the quoted price of the Ordinary Shares at the date of issue. The acquisition is then recorded as an asset or expensed in accordance with accounting standards.
(u) Use and Revision of Accounting Estimates, Judgements and Assumptions
The preparation of the financial report requires management to make judgements, estimates and assumptions that affect the application of accounting policies and the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, income and expenses. Actual results may differ from these estimates. The estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis. Revisions to accounting estimates are recognised in the period in which the estimate is revised if the revision affects only that period, or in the period of the revision and future periods if the revision affects both current and future periods.
In particular, information about significant areas of estimation uncertainty and critical judgements in applying accounting policies that have the most significant effect on the amounts recognised in the financial statements are described in the following notes:
· Exploration and Evaluation Expenditure (Note 10)
· Share-Based Payments (Note 20)
2. SEGMENT INFORMATION
The Consolidated Entity operates in one operating segment and one geographical segment, being mineral exploration in Australia. This is the basis on which internal reports are provided to the Directors for assessing performance and determining the allocation of resources within the Consolidated Entity.
3. FINANCE INCOME
2018 |
2017 |
||
Note |
$ |
$ |
|
Interest income |
238,208 |
123,477 |
|
238,208 |
123,477 |
4. OTHER INCOME
2018 |
2017 |
||
Note |
$ |
$ |
|
Gain on disposal of controlled entity1 |
– |
454,468 |
|
Exploration Incentive Scheme |
– |
150,000 |
|
R&D tax incentive |
456,709 |
– |
|
456,709 |
604,468 |
Notes:
1 During the 2017 year, the Company sold its United States subsidiary, Golden Eagle Uranium, for a nominal amount which resulted in a gain on disposal of A$454,468 relating to prior exchange differences on translation of Golden Eagle Uranium that have been transferred from the foreign currency translation reserve.
5. EXPENSES
2018 |
2017 |
||
Note |
$ |
$ |
|
(a) Depreciation included in statement of comprehensive income |
|||
Depreciation of plant and equipment |
9 |
75,031 |
37,088 |
|
|||
(b) Employee benefits expense (including KMP) |
|||
Salaries and wages |
1,942,801 |
1,342,932 |
|
Superannuation expense |
176,466 |
126,503 |
|
Share-based payment expense |
20 |
1,284,062 |
580,976 |
Total employment expenses included in profit or loss |
3,403,329 |
2,050,411 |
6. INCOME TAX
2018 |
2017 |
|
$ |
$ |
|
(a) Recognised in the statement of comprehensive income |
||
Current income tax |
||
Current income tax benefit in respect of the current year |
– |
– |
Deferred income tax |
||
Deferred income tax |
– |
– |
Income tax expense reported in the statement of Profit or Loss and other Comprehensive income |
– |
– |
(b) Reconciliation between tax expense and accounting loss before income tax |
||
Accounting loss before income tax |
(11,327,108) |
(9,200,509) |
At the domestic income tax rate of 27.5% (2017: 27.5%) |
(3,114,955) |
(2,530,140) |
Expenditure not allowable for income tax purposes |
511,763 |
280,752 |
Income not assessable for income tax purposes |
(125,595) |
(124,979) |
Adjustment in respect of current income tax of previous years |
(3,447) |
– |
Deferred tax assets not brought to account |
2,732,234 |
2,374,367 |
Income tax expense/(benefit) reported in the statement of Profit or Loss and other Comprehensive income |
– |
– |
2018 |
2017 |
|
$ |
$ |
|
(c) Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities |
||
Deferred income tax at 30 June relates to the following: |
||
Deferred Tax Liabilities |
||
Accrued income |
4,833 |
6,110 |
Exploration and evaluation assets |
43,209 |
43,209 |
Deferred tax assets used to offset deferred tax liabilities |
(48,042) |
(49,319) |
– |
– |
|
Deferred Tax Assets |
||
Accrued expenditure |
21,813 |
7,200 |
Capital allowances |
243,070 |
341,543 |
Tax losses available for offset against future taxable income |
9,183,494 |
6,368,677 |
Deferred tax assets used to offset deferred tax liabilities |
(48,042) |
(49,319) |
Deferred tax assets not brought to account |
(9,400,335) |
(6,668,101) |
– |
– |
The benefit of deferred tax assets not brought to account will only be brought to account if:
· future assessable income is derived of a nature and of an amount sufficient to enable the benefit to be realised;
· the conditions for deductibility imposed by tax legislation continue to be complied with; and
· no changes in tax legislation adversely affect the Group in realising the benefit.
Deferred tax assets have not been recognised in respect to tax losses because it is not probable that future taxable profit will be available against which the Group can utilise the benefits.
(d) Tax Consolidation
The Company and its wholly-owned Australian resident entities have formed a tax consolidated group and are therefore taxed as a single entity. The head entity within the tax consolidated group is Salt Lake Potash Limited.
7. CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
2018 |
2017 |
||
$ |
$ |
||
|
|||
Cash on hand and at bank |
1,596,390 |
15,524,703 |
|
Deposit on call |
4,113,056 |
72,056 |
|
5,709,446 |
15,596,759 |
8. TRADE AND OTHER RECEIVABLES
2018 |
2017 |
||
$ |
$ |
||
|
|||
Accrued interest |
17,572 |
22,216 |
|
GST and other receivables |
209,701 |
277,842 |
|
227,273 |
300,058 |
9. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
2018 |
2017 |
||
$ |
$ |
||
(a) Plant and Equipment |
|||
Gross carrying amount – at cost |
652,644 |
345,780 |
|
Accumulated depreciation |
(117,300) |
(42,269) |
|
Carrying amount at end of year, net of accumulated depreciation |
535,344 |
303,511 |
|
|
|||
(b) Reconciliation |
|||
Carrying amount at beginning of year, net of accumulated depreciation |
303,511 |
115,275 |
|
Additions |
306,864 |
225,324 |
|
Depreciation charge |
(75,031) |
(37,088) |
|
Carrying amount at end of year, net of accumulated depreciation |
535,344 |
303,511 |
Finance Leases
The carrying value of plant and equipment held under finance leases at 30 June 2018 was $55,857 (2017: $64,036). Additions during the year include $Nil (2017: $64,036) of plant and equipment under finance lease.
10. EXPLORATION AND EVALUATION EXPENDITURE
2018 |
2017 |
||
Note |
$ |
$ |
|
(a) Areas of Interest |
|||
SOP Project |
2,276,736 |
2,276,736 |
|
Carrying amount at end of year, net of impairment1 |
2,276,736 |
2,276,736 |
|
(b) Reconciliation |
|||
Carrying amount at start of year |
2,276,736 |
2,276,736 |
|
Impairment losses |
– |
– |
|
Carrying amount at end of year net of impairment 1 |
2,276,736 |
2,276,736 |
Notes:
1 The ultimate recoupment of costs carried forward for exploration and evaluation is dependent on the successful development and commercial exploitation or sale of the respective areas of interest.
SOP Project
Salt Lake holds a number of large salt lake brine projects (Projects) in Western Australia and the Northern Territory, each having potential to produce highly sought after Sulphate of Potash (SOP) for domestic and international fertiliser markets.
11. TRADE AND OTHER PAYABLES
2018 |
2017 |
||
$ |
$ |
||
Trade creditors |
1,483,554 |
1,250,959 |
|
Accrued expenses |
136,973 |
97,832 |
|
1,620,527 |
1,348,791 |
Terms and conditions of the above financial liabilities:
– Trade payables are non-interest bearing and are normally settled on 30-day terms.
12. PROVISIONS
2018 |
2017 |
||
$ |
$ |
||
Statutory employee benefits |
57,462 |
19,181 |
|
57,462 |
19,181 |
13. CONTRIBUTED EQUITY
30 June 2018 |
30 June 2017 |
|
Share Capital |
||
175,049,596 (30 June 2017: 175,007,596) Ordinary Shares |
123,501,153 |
123,484,561 |
123,501,153 |
123,484,561 |
(a) Movements in Ordinary Shares During the Past Two Years Were as Follows:
Number of Ordinary Shares |
Issue Price $ |
$ |
||
01-Jul-17 |
Opening Balance |
175,007,596 |
123,484,561 |
|
18-Aug-17 |
Share issue 1 |
42,000 |
0.44 |
18,476 |
Jul-17 to Jun-18 |
Share issue costs |
– |
– |
(1,884) |
30-Jun-18 |
Closing balance |
175,049,596 |
123,501,153 |
|
01-Jul-16 |
Opening Balance |
133,827,596 |
– |
106,761,669 |
09-Sep-16 |
Share issue 1 |
180,000 |
0.48 |
86,400 |
02-May-17 |
Share placement |
30,700,000 |
0.43 |
13,201,000 |
21-Jun-17 |
Share placement |
10,300,000 |
0.43 |
4,429,000 |
Jul-16 to Jun-17 |
Share issue costs |
– |
– |
(993,508) |
30-Jun-17 |
Closing balance |
175,007,596 |
– |
123,484,561 |
Notes:
1 Shares issued to a key consultant of the Company in lieu of fees.
(b) Rights Attaching to Ordinary Shares:
The rights attaching to fully paid Ordinary Shares (Ordinary Shares) arise from a combination of the Company’s Constitution, statute and general law.
Ordinary Shares issued following the exercise of Unlisted Options in accordance with Note 14(c) or Performance Shares in accordance with Note 14(d) or Performance Rights in accordance with Note 14(e) will rank equally in all respects with the Company’s existing Ordinary Shares.
Copies of the Company’s Constitution are available for inspection during business hours at the Company’s registered office. The clauses of the Constitution contain the internal rules of the Company and define matters such as the rights, duties and powers of its shareholders and directors, including provisions to the following effect (when read in conjunction with the Corporations Act 2001 or the listing rules of the ASX and AIM (Listing Rules)).
(i) Shares
The issue of shares in the capital of the Company and options over unissued shares by the Company is under the control of the Directors, subject to the Corporations Act 2001, ASX Listing Rules and any rights attached to any special class of shares.
(ii) Meetings of Members
Directors may call a meeting of members whenever they think fit. Members may call a meeting as provided by the Corporations Act 2001. The Constitution contains provisions prescribing the content requirements of notices of meetings of members and all members are entitled to a notice of meeting. A meeting may be held in two or more places linked together by audio-visual communication devices. A quorum for a meeting of members is two shareholders.
The Company holds annual general meetings in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001 and the Listing Rules.
(iii) Voting
Subject to any rights or restrictions at the time being attached to any shares or class of shares of the Company, each member of the Company is entitled to receive notice of, attend and vote at a general meeting. Resolutions of members will be decided by a show of hands unless a poll is demanded. On a show of hands each eligible voter present has one vote. However, where a person present at a general meeting represents personally or by proxy, attorney or representative more than one member, on a show of hands the person is entitled to one vote only despite the number of members the person represents.
On a poll each eligible member has one vote for each fully paid share held and a fraction of a vote for each partly paid share determined by the amount paid up on that share.
(iv) Changes to the Constitution
The Company’s Constitution can only be amended by a special resolution passed by at least three quarters of the members present and voting at a general meeting of the Company. At least 28 days’ written notice specifying the intention to propose the resolution as a special resolution must be given.
(v) Listing Rules
Provided the Company remains admitted to the Official List of the ASX, then despite anything in its Constitution, no act may be done that is prohibited by the Listing Rules, and authority is given for acts required to be done by the Listing Rules. The Company’s Constitution will be deemed to comply with the Listing Rules as amended from time to time.
14. RESERVES
2018 |
2017 |
||
Note |
$ |
$ |
|
Share-based payments reserve |
14(b) |
2,105,886 |
821,824 |
2,105,886 |
821,824 |
(a) Nature and Purpose of Reserves
(i) Share-based payments reserve
The share-based payments reserve is used to record the fair value of Unlisted Options, Performance Rights and Performance Shares issued by the Group.
(b) Movements in the share-based payments reserve during the past two years were as follows:
Number of Performance Rights |
Number of Performance Shares |
Number of |
$ |
||
01-Jul-17 |
Opening Balance |
4,100,000 |
22,500,000 |
2,500,000 |
821,824 |
23-Sep-17 |
Performance Rights forfeited |
(1,000,000) |
– |
– |
– |
28-Nov-17 |
Issue of unlisted options |
– |
– |
1,100,000 |
– |
22-Dec-17 |
Issue of unlisted options |
– |
– |
800,000 |
– |
22-Dec-17 |
Issue of Performance Rights |
2,300,000 |
– |
– |
– |
Jul-17 to Jun-18 |
Share based payments expense |
– |
– |
– |
1,284,062 |
30-Jun-18 |
Closing balance |
5,400,000 |
22,500,000 |
4,400,000 |
2,105,886 |
01-Jul-16 |
Opening Balance |
– |
22,500,000 |
2,705,443 |
240,848 |
22-Nov-16 |
Expiry of unlisted options |
– |
– |
(205,443) |
– |
01-Mar-17 |
Issue of Performance Rights |
3,000,000 |
– |
– |
– |
09-Jun-17 |
Issue of Performance Rights |
200,000 |
– |
– |
– |
20-Jun-17 |
Issue of Performance Rights |
1,000,000 |
– |
– |
– |
30-Jun-17 |
Lapsed Performance Rights |
(100,000) |
– |
– |
– |
Jul-16 to Jun-17 |
Share based payments expense |
– |
– |
– |
580,976 |
30-Jun-17 |
Closing balance |
4,100,000 |
22,500,000 |
2,500,000 |
821,824 |
(c) Terms and Conditions of Unlisted Options
The Unlisted Options are granted based upon the following terms and conditions:
· Each Unlisted Option entitles the holder to the right to subscribe for one Ordinary Share upon the exercise of each Unlisted Option;
· The Unlisted Options outstanding at the end of the financial year have the following exercise prices and expiry dates:
· 750,000 Unlisted Options exercisable at $0.40 each on or before 29 April 2019;
· 750,000 Unlisted Options exercisable at $0.50 each on or before 29 April 2020;
· 1,000,000 Unlisted Options exercisable at $0.60 each on or before 29 April 2021;
· 250,000 Unlisted Options exercisable at $0.40 each on or before 30 June 2021;
· 500,000 Unlisted Options exercisable at $0.50 each on or before 30 June 2021;
· 750,000 Unlisted Options exercisable at $0.60 each on or before 30 June 2021; and
· 400,000 Unlisted Options exercisable at $0.70 each on or before 30 June 2021.
· The Unlisted Options are exercisable at any time prior to the Expiry Date, subject to vesting conditions being satisfied (if applicable);
· Ordinary Shares issued on exercise of the Unlisted Options rank equally with the then Ordinary Shares of the Company;
· Application will be made by the Company to ASX and to the AIM market of the London Stock Exchange for official quotation of the Ordinary Shares issued upon the exercise of the Unlisted Options;
· If there is any reconstruction of the issued share capital of the Company, the rights of the Unlisted Option holders may be varied to comply with the Listing Rules which apply to the reconstruction at the time of the reconstruction; and
· No application for quotation of the Unlisted Options will be made by the Company.
(d) Terms and Conditions of Performance Shares
The Convertible Performance Shares (Performance Shares) were granted as part of the consideration to acquire Australia Salt Lake Potash Pty Ltd on the following terms and conditions:
· Each Performance Share will convert into one Ordinary Share upon the satisfaction, prior to the Expiry Date, of the respective Milestone:
– 5,000,000 Performance Shares subject to Class A Milestone: The announcement by the Company to ASX of the results of a positive Pre-feasibility Study on all or part of the Project Licences;
– 7,500,000 Performance Shares subject to Class B Milestone: The announcement by the Company to ASX of the results of a positive Definitive Feasibility Study on all or part of the Project Licences; and
– 10,000,000 Performance Shares subject to Class C Milestone: The commencement of construction activities for a mining operation on all or part of the Project Licences (including the commencement of ground breaking for the construction of infrastructure and/or processing facilities) following a final investment decision by the Board as per the project development schedule and budget in accordance with the Definitive Feasibility Study, within five years from the date of issue.
· Expiry Date means:
– in relation to the Class A Performance Shares, 31 December 2018 (amended following Shareholder approval on 11 June 2018);
– in relation to the Class B Performance Shares, 31 December 2019 (amended following Shareholder approval on 11 June 2018);
and
– in relation to the Class C Performance Shares, 5 years from the date of issue (12 June 2020);
· If the Milestone for a Performance Share is not met by the Expiry Date, the total number of the relevant class of Performance Shares will convert into one Ordinary Share per holder;
· The Company shall allot and issue Ordinary Shares immediately upon conversion of the Performance Shares for no consideration;
· Ordinary Shares issued on conversion of the Performance Shares rank equally with the then Ordinary Shares of the Company;
· In the event of any reconstruction, consolidation or division into (respectively) a lesser or greater number of securities of the Ordinary Shares, the Performance Shares shall be reconstructed, consolidated or divided in the same proportion as the Ordinary Shares are reconstructed, consolidated or divided and, in any event, in a manner which will not result in any additional benefits being conferred on the Performance Shareholders which are not conferred on the Ordinary Shareholders;
· The Performance Shareholders shall have no right to vote, subject to the Corporations Act;
· No application for quotation of the Performance Shares will be made by the Company; and
· The Performance Shares are not transferable.
(e) Terms and Conditions of Performance Rights
The Performance Rights are granted based upon the following terms and conditions:
· Each Performance Right automatically converts into one Ordinary Share upon vesting of the Performance Right;
· Each Performance Right is subject to performance conditions (as determined by the Board from time to time) which must be satisfied in order for the Performance Right to vest;
· The Performance Rights have the following expiry dates:
– 1,350,000 Performance Rights subject to the PFS Milestone expiring on 31 December 2018 (amended following Shareholder approval on 11 June 2018);
– 1,350,000 Performance Rights subject to the BFS Milestone expiring on 31 December 2019 (amended following Shareholder approval on 11 June 2018);
– 1,350,000 Performance Rights subject to the Construction Milestone expiring on 30 June 2020; and
– 1,350,000 Performance Rights subject to the Production Milestone expiring on 30 June 2021.
· Ordinary Shares issued on conversion of the Performance Rights rank equally with the then Ordinary Shares of the Company;
· Application will be made by the Company to ASX AIM market of the London Stock Exchange for official quotation of the Ordinary Shares issued upon conversion of the Performance Rights;
· If there is any reconstruction of the issued share capital of the Company, the rights of the Performance Right holders may be varied to comply with the Listing Rules which apply to the reconstruction at the time of the reconstruction; and
· No application for quotation of the Performance Rights will be made by the Company.
15. STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(a) Reconciliation of the Loss after Tax to the Net Cash Flows from Operations
2018 |
2017 |
||
$ |
$ |
||
Net loss for the year |
(11,327,108) |
(9,200,509) |
|
Adjustment for non-cash income and expense items |
|||
Depreciation of plant and equipment |
75,031 |
37,088 |
|
Share based payment expense |
1,284,062 |
580,976 |
|
Gain on disposal of controlled entity |
– |
(454,468) |
|
Shares issued in lieu of fees |
18,476 |
86,400 |
|
Change in operating assets and liabilities |
|||
(Increase)/decrease in trade and other receivables |
84,784 |
(173,475) |
|
Increase in trade and other payables |
280,212 |
693,100 |
|
Increase in provisions |
38,281 |
7,469 |
|
Net cash outflow from operating activities |
(9,546,262) |
(8,423,419) |
16. EARNINGS PER SHARE
30 June 2018 $ |
30 June 2017 $ |
|
The following reflects the income and share data used in the calculations of basic and diluted earnings per share: |
||
Net loss attributable to the owners of the Company used in calculating basic and diluted earnings per share |
(11,327,108) |
(9,200,509) |
Number of Shares |
Number of Shares |
|
Weighted average number of ordinary shares used in calculating basic and diluted earnings per share |
175,043,958 |
139,217,150 |
(a) Non-Dilutive Securities
As at balance date, 4,400,000 Unlisted Options (which represent 4,400,000 potential Ordinary Shares), 22,500,000 Performance Shares (which represent 22,500,000 potential Ordinary Shares) and 5,400,000 Performance Rights (which represent 5,400,000 potential Ordinary Shares) were considered non-dilutive as they would decrease the loss per share.
(b) Conversions, Calls, Subscriptions or Issues after 30 June 2018
No securities have been issued since 30 June 2018.
There have been no other conversions to, calls of, or subscriptions for Ordinary Shares or issues of potential Ordinary Shares since the reporting date and before the completion of this financial report.
17. RELATED PARTIES
(a) Subsidiaries
% Equity Interest |
|||
Name |
Country of Incorporation |
2018 |
2017 |
Ultimate parent entity: |
|||
Salt Lake Potash Limited |
Australia |
||
Subsidiaries of Salt Lake Potash Limited |
|||
Australia Salt Lake Potash Pty Ltd (ASLP) |
Australia |
100 |
100 |
Subsidiary of ASLP |
|||
Piper Preston Pty Ltd |
Australia |
100 |
100 |
Peak Coal Pty Ltd |
Australia |
–(i) |
100 |
(i) Peak Coal was deregistered in April 2018.
(b) Ultimate Parent
Salt Lake Potash Limited is the ultimate parent of the Group.
(c) Transactions with Related Parties
Balances and transactions between the Company and its subsidiaries, which are related parties of the Company, have been eliminated on consolidation and are not disclosed in this note. Transactions with Key Management Personnel, including remuneration, are included at Note 18.
18. KEY MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL
(a) Details of Key Management Personnel
The KMP of the Group during or since the end of the financial year were as follows:
Directors
Mr Ian Middlemas Chairman
Mr Matthew Syme Chief Executive Officer
Mr Mark Pearce Non-Executive Director
Mr Bryn Jones Non-Executive Director
Mr Mark Hohnen Non-Executive Director (resigned 1 December 2017)
Other KMP
Mr David Maxton Chief Operating Officer (appointed 12 April 2018)
Mr Clint McGhie Chief Financial Officer and Company Secretary (appointed 10 August 2018)
Mr Grant Coyle Business Development Manager (appointed 16 July 2018)
Mr Sam Cordin Chief Financial Officer and Company Secretary (resigned 10 August 2018)
Unless otherwise disclosed, the KMP held their position from 1 July 2017 until the date of this report.
2018 |
2017 |
||
$ |
$ |
||
Short-term employee benefits |
726,607 |
591,898 |
|
Post-employment benefits |
49,875 |
52,928 |
|
Share-based payments |
595,394 |
556,016 |
|
Total compensation |
1,371,876 |
1,200,842 |
(b) Loans from Key Management Personnel
No loans were provided to or received from Key Management Personnel during the year ended 30 June 2018 (2017: Nil).
(c) Other Transactions
Apollo Group Pty Ltd, a Company of which Mr Mark Pearce is a Director and beneficial shareholder, was paid or is payable $150,000 (2017: $150,000) for the provision of serviced office facilities, corporate and administration services for the year ended 30 June 2018. The amount is based on a monthly retainer due and payable in advance, with no fixed term, and is able to be terminated by either party with one month’s notice. At 30 June 2018, $25,000 (2017: $12,500) was included as a current liability in the Statement of Financial Position.
19. PARENT ENTITY DISCLOSURES
2018 |
2017 |
|
$ |
$ |
|
|
||
(a) Financial Position |
||
Assets |
||
Current assets |
5,929,459 |
15,738,697 |
Non-current assets |
2,106,089 |
2,027,221 |
Total assets |
8,035,548 |
17,765,918 |
Liabilities |
||
Current liabilities |
1,689,818 |
1,430,620 |
Non-current liabilities |
38,992 |
– |
Total liabilities |
1,728,810 |
1,430,620 |
Equity |
||
Contributed equity |
123,501,153 |
123,484,561 |
Accumulated losses |
(119,300,301) |
(107,971,087) |
Reserves |
2,105,886 |
821,824 |
Total equity |
6,306,738 |
16,335,298 |
(b) Financial Performance |
||
Loss for the year |
(11,329,214) |
(10,366,123) |
Total comprehensive loss |
(11,329,214) |
(10,366,123) |
(c) Other information
The Company has not entered into any guarantees in relation to its subsidiaries.
Refer to Note 23 for details of contingent assets and liabilities.
20. SHARE-BASED PAYMENTS
(a) Recognised Share-based Payment Expense
From time to time, the Group provides incentive Unlisted Options and Performance Rights to officers, employees, consultants and other key advisors as part of remuneration and incentive arrangements. The number of options or rights granted, and the terms of the options or rights granted are determined by the Board. Shareholder approval is sought where required.
In the current and prior year, the Company has also granted shares in lieu of payments to a consultant in accordance with the terms of engagement.
During the past two years, the following equity-settled share-based payments have been recognised:
2018 |
2017 |
||
$ |
$ |
||
Expenses arising from equity-settled share-based payment transactions relating incentive options and performance rights |
1,284,062 |
580,976 |
|
Expenses arising from equity-settled share-based payment transactions to suppliers and consultants |
18,476 |
86,400 |
|
Total share-based payments recognised during the year |
1,302,538 |
667,376 |
(b) Summary of Unlisted Options and Performance Rights Granted as Share-based Payments
The following Unlisted Options and Performance Rights were granted as share-based payments during the past two years:
Series |
Issuing Entity |
Security Type |
Number |
Grant |
Expiry Date |
Exercise Price $ |
Grant Date Fair Value $ |
2018 |
|||||||
Series 20 |
Salt Lake Potash Limited |
Options |
250,000 |
22-Nov-17 |
30-Jun-21 |
0.40 |
0.284 |
Series 21 |
Salt Lake Potash Limited |
Options |
350,000 |
22-Nov-17 |
30-Jun-21 |
0.50 |
0.256 |
Series 22 |
Salt Lake Potash Limited |
Options |
500,000 |
22-Nov-17 |
30-Jun-21 |
0.60 |
0.233 |
Series 23 |
Salt Lake Potash Limited |
Options |
150,000 |
15-Dec-17 |
30-Jun-21 |
0.50 |
0.228 |
Series 24 |
Salt Lake Potash Limited |
Options |
250,000 |
15-Dec-17 |
30-Jun-21 |
0.60 |
0.207 |
Series 25 |
Salt Lake Potash Limited |
Options |
400,000 |
15-Dec-17 |
30-Jun-21 |
0.70 |
0.188 |
Series 26 |
Salt Lake Potash Limited |
Rights |
575,000 |
15-Dec-17 |
30-Jun-18 |
– |
0.486 |
Series 27 |
Salt Lake Potash Limited |
Rights |
575,000 |
15-Dec-17 |
30-Jun-19 |
– |
0.486 |
Series 28 |
Salt Lake Potash Limited |
Rights |
575,000 |
15-Dec-17 |
30-Jun-20 |
– |
0.486 |
Series 29 |
Salt Lake Potash Limited |
Rights |
575,000 |
15-Dec-17 |
30-Jun-21 |
– |
0.486 |
2017 |
|||||||
Series 4 |
Salt Lake Potash Limited |
Rights |
550,000 |
30-Nov-16 |
30-Jun-18 |
– |
0.506 |
Series 5 |
Salt Lake Potash Limited |
Rights |
550,000 |
30-Nov-16 |
30-Jun-19 |
– |
0.506 |
Series 6 |
Salt Lake Potash Limited |
Rights |
550,000 |
30-Nov-16 |
30-Jun-20 |
– |
0.506 |
Series 7 |
Salt Lake Potash Limited |
Rights |
550,000 |
30-Nov-16 |
30-Jun-21 |
– |
0.506 |
Series 8 |
Salt Lake Potash Limited |
Rights |
200,000 |
07-Feb-17 |
30-Jun-18 |
– |
0.543 |
Series 9 |
Salt Lake Potash Limited |
Rights |
200,000 |
07-Feb-17 |
30-Jun-19 |
– |
0.543 |
Series 10 |
Salt Lake Potash Limited |
Rights |
200,000 |
07-Feb-17 |
30-Jun-20 |
– |
0.543 |
Series 11 |
Salt Lake Potash Limited |
Rights |
200,000 |
07-Feb-17 |
30-Jun-21 |
– |
0.543 |
Series 12 |
Salt Lake Potash Limited |
Rights |
50,000 |
08-Jun-17 |
30-Jun-18 |
– |
0.428 |
Series 13 |
Salt Lake Potash Limited |
Rights |
50,000 |
08-Jun-17 |
30-Jun-19 |
– |
0.428 |
Series 14 |
Salt Lake Potash Limited |
Rights |
50,000 |
08-Jun-17 |
30-Jun-20 |
– |
0.428 |
Series 15 |
Salt Lake Potash Limited |
Rights |
50,000 |
08-Jun-17 |
30-Jun-21 |
– |
0.428 |
Series 16 |
Salt Lake Potash Limited |
Rights |
250,000 |
08-Jun-17 |
30-Jun-18 |
– |
0.412 |
Series 17 |
Salt Lake Potash Limited |
Rights |
250,000 |
08-Jun-17 |
30-Jun-19 |
– |
0.412 |
Series 18 |
Salt Lake Potash Limited |
Rights |
250,000 |
08-Jun-17 |
30-Jun-20 |
– |
0.412 |
Series 19 |
Salt Lake Potash Limited |
Rights |
250,000 |
08-Jun-17 |
30-Jun-21 |
– |
0.412 |
(c) Summary of Unlisted Options and Performance Rights Granted as Share-based Payments
The following table illustrates the number and weighted average exercise prices (WAEP) of Unlisted Options granted as share-based payments at the beginning and end of the financial year:
Unlisted Options |
2018 |
2018 |
2017 |
2017 |
Outstanding at beginning of year |
2,500,000 |
$0.51 |
2,705,443 |
$0.81 |
Granted by the Company during the year |
1,900,000 |
$0.57 |
– |
– |
Forfeited/cancelled/lapsed/expired |
– |
– |
(205,443) |
$4.46 |
Outstanding at end of year |
4,400,000 |
$0.53 |
2,500,000 |
$0.51 |
Exercisable at end of year |
3,500,000 |
$0.51 |
1,500,000 |
$0.45 |
The outstanding balance of Unlisted Options as at 30 June 2018 is represented by:
· 750,000 Unlisted Options exercisable at $0.40 each on or before 29 April 2019;
· 750,000 Unlisted Options exercisable at $0.50 each on or before 29 April 2020;
· 1,000,000 Unlisted Options exercisable at $0.60 each on or before 29 April 2021;’
· 250,000 Unlisted Options exercisable at $0.40 each on or before 30 June 2021;
· 500,000 Unlisted Options exercisable at $0.50 each on or before 30 June 2021;
· 750,000 Unlisted Options exercisable at $0.60 each on or before 30 June 2021; and
· 400,000 Unlisted Options exercisable at $0.70 each on or before 30 June 2021.
The following table illustrates the number and weighted average exercise prices (WAEP) of Performance Rights granted as share-based payments at the beginning and end of the financial year:
Performance Rights |
2018 |
2018 |
2017 |
2017 |
Outstanding at beginning of year |
4,100,000 |
– |
– |
– |
Granted by the Company during the year |
2,300,000 |
– |
4,200,000 |
– |
Forfeited/cancelled/lapsed/expired |
(1,000,000) |
– |
(100,000) |
– |
Outstanding at end of year |
5,400,000 |
– |
4,100,000 |
– |
The outstanding balance of Performance Rights as at 30 June 2018 is represented by:
· 1,350,000 Performance Rights subject to the PFS Milestone expiring on 31 December 2018 (amended following Shareholder approval on 12 June 2018);
· 1,350,000 Performance Rights subject to the BFS Milestone expiring on 31 December 2019 (amended following Shareholder approval on 12 June 2018);
· 1,350,000 Performance Rights subject to the Construction Milestone expiring on 30 June 2020; and
· 1,350,000 Performance Rights subject to the Production Milestone expiring on 30 June 2021.
(d) Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life
At 30 June 2018, the weighted average remaining contractual life of Unlisted Options on issue that had been granted as share-based payments was 2.39 years (2017: 2.93 years) and of Performance Rights on issue that had been granted as share-based payments was 1.75 years (2017: 2.5 years).
(e) Range of Exercise Prices
At 30 June 2018, the range of exercise prices of Unlisted Options on issue that had been granted as share-based payments was $0.40 to $0.70 (2017: $0.40 to $0.60). Performance Rights have no exercise price.
(f) Weighted Average Fair Value
The weighted average fair value of Unlisted Options granted as share-based payments by the Group during the year ended 30 June 2018 was $0.231 (2017: nil) and of Performance Rights granted as share-based payments was $0.486 (2017: $0.496).
(g) Option and Performance Right Pricing Models
The fair value of the equity-settled share options granted is estimated as at the date of grant using the Binomial option valuation model taking into account the terms and conditions upon which the Unlisted Options were granted. The fair value of Performance Rights granted is estimated as at the date of grant based on the underlying share price (being the five day volume weighted average share price prior to issuance).
The table below lists the inputs to the valuation model used for share options and Performance Rights granted by the Group in the current and prior year:
2018
Inputs |
Series 20 |
Series 21 |
Series 22 |
Series 23 |
Series 24 |
Series 25 |
Options |
||||||
Exercise price |
0.40 |
0.50 |
0.60 |
0.50 |
0.60 |
0.70 |
Grant date share price |
0.50 |
0.50 |
0.50 |
0.465 |
0.465 |
0.465 |
Dividend yield 1 |
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
Volatility 2 |
70% |
70% |
70% |
70% |
70% |
70% |
Risk-free interest rate |
1.99% |
1.99% |
1.99% |
2.16% |
2.16% |
2.16% |
Grant date |
22-Nov-17 |
22-Nov-17 |
22-Nov-17 |
15-Dec-17 |
15-Dec-17 |
15-Dec-17 |
Expiry date |
30-Jun-21 |
30-Jun-21 |
30-Jun-21 |
30-Jun-21 |
30-Jun-21 |
30-Jun-21 |
Expected life of option 3 |
3.61 |
3.61 |
3.61 |
3.54 |
3.54 |
3.54 |
Fair value at grant date |
0.284 |
0.256 |
0.233 |
0.228 |
0.207 |
0.188 |
Notes:
1 The dividend yield reflects the assumption that the current dividend payout will remain unchanged.
2 The expected volatility reflects the assumption that the historical volatility is indicative of future trends, which may not necessarily be the actual outcome.
3 The expected life of the options is based on the expiry date of the options as there is limited track record of the early exercise of options.
Inputs |
Series 26 |
Series 27 |
Series 28 |
Series 29 |
Performance Rights |
||||
Exercise price |
– |
– |
– |
– |
Grant date share price |
$0.465 |
$0.465 |
$0.465 |
$0.465 |
Grant date |
15-Dec-17 |
15-Dec-17 |
15-Dec-17 |
15-Dec-17 |
Expiry date |
30-Jun-18 3 |
30-Jun-19 4 |
30-Jun-20 |
30-Jun-21 |
Expected life of right 1 |
0.5 years |
1.5 years |
2.5 years |
3.5 years |
Fair value at grant date 2 |
$0.486 |
$0.486 |
$0.486 |
$0.486 |
Notes:
1 The expected life of the Performance Rights is based on the expiry date of the performance rights as there is limited track record of the early conversion of performance rights.
2 The fair value of Performance Rights granted is estimated as at the date of grant based on the underlying share price (being the five day volume weighted average share price prior to issuance).
3 Subsequent to grant, the expiry date was amended to 31 December 2018 following Shareholder approval on 11 June 2018. This has no impact on the fair value of the securities, however the period that the expense is being recognised over has been modified.
4 Subsequent to grant, the expiry date was amended to 31 December 2019 following Shareholder approval on 11 June 2018. This has no impact on the fair value of the securities, however the period that the expense is being recognised over has been modified.
2017
Inputs |
Series 4 |
Series 5 |
Series 6 |
Series 7 |
Exercise price |
– |
– |
– |
– |
Grant date share price |
$0.51 |
$0.51 |
$0.51 |
$0.51 |
Grant date |
30-Nov-16 |
30-Nov-16 |
30-Nov-16 |
30-Nov-16 |
Expiry date |
30-Jun-18 |
30-Jun-19 |
30-Jun-20 |
30-Jun-21 |
Expected life of right 1 |
1.6 years |
2.6 years |
3.6 years |
4.6 years |
Fair value at grant date 2 |
$0.506 |
$0.506 |
$0.506 |
$0.506 |
Inputs |
Series 8 |
Series 9 |
Series 10 |
Series 11 |
Exercise price |
– |
– |
– |
– |
Grant date share price |
$0.53 |
$0.53 |
$0.53 |
$0.53 |
Grant date |
07-Feb-17 |
07-Feb-17 |
07-Feb-17 |
07-Feb-17 |
Expiry date |
30-Jun-18 |
30-Jun-19 |
30-Jun-20 |
30-Jun-21 |
Expected life of right 1 |
1.3 years |
2.3 years |
3.3 years |
4.3 years |
Fair value at grant date 2 |
$0.577 |
$0.577 |
$0.577 |
$0.577 |
Inputs |
Series 12 |
Series 13 |
Series 14 |
Series 15 |
Exercise price |
– |
– |
– |
– |
Grant date share price |
$0.43 |
$0.43 |
$0.43 |
$0.43 |
Grant date |
08-Jun-17 |
08-Jun-17 |
08-Jun-17 |
08-Jun-17 |
Expiry date |
30-Jun-18 |
30-Jun-19 |
30-Jun-20 |
30-Jun-21 |
Expected life of right 1 |
1.1 years |
2.1 years |
3.1 years |
4.1 years |
Fair value at grant date 2 |
$0.431 |
$0.431 |
$0.431 |
$0.431 |
Inputs |
Series 16 |
Series 17 |
Series 18 |
Series 19 |
Exercise price |
– |
– |
– |
– |
Grant date share price |
$0.41 |
$0.41 |
$0.41 |
$0.41 |
Grant date |
08-Jun-17 |
08-Jun-17 |
08-Jun-17 |
08-Jun-17 |
Expiry date |
30-Jun-18 |
30-Jun-19 |
30-Jun-20 |
30-Jun-21 |
Expected life of right 1 |
1.0 years |
2.0 years |
3.0 years |
4.0 years |
Fair value at grant date 2 |
$0.431 |
$0.431 |
$0.431 |
$0.431 |
Notes:
1 The expected life of the Performance Rights is based on the expiry date of the performance rights as there is limited track record of the early conversion of performance rights.
2 The fair value of Performance Rights granted is estimated as at the date of grant based on the underlying share price (being the five day volume weighted average share price prior to issuance).
21. AUDITORS’ REMUNERATION
The auditor of Salt Lake Potash Limited is Ernst and Young.
2018 |
2017 |
|
$ |
$ |
|
Amounts received or due and receivable by Ernst and Young for: |
||
– an audit or review of the financial report of the entity and any other entity in the consolidated group |
25,000 |
25,000 |
– tax and other advisory services |
8,188 |
5,000 |
33,188 |
30,000 |
22. FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
(a) Overview
The Group’s principal financial instruments comprise receivables, payables, finance leases, cash and short-term deposits. The main risks arising from the Group’s financial instruments are credit risk, liquidity risk and interest rate risk.
This note presents information about the Group’s exposure to each of the above risks, its objectives, policies and processes for measuring and managing risk, and the management of capital. Other than as disclosed, there have been no significant changes since the previous financial year to the exposure or management of these risks.
The Group manages its exposure to key financial risks in accordance with the Group’s financial risk management policy. Key risks are monitored and reviewed as circumstances change (e.g. acquisition of a new project) and policies are revised as required. The overall objective of the Group’s financial risk management policy is to support the delivery of the Group’s financial targets whilst protecting future financial security.
Given the nature and size of the business and uncertainty as to the timing and amount of cash inflows and outflows, the Group does not enter into derivative transactions to mitigate the financial risks. In addition, the Group’s policy is that no trading in financial instruments shall be undertaken for the purposes of making speculative gains. As the Group’s operations change, the Directors will review this policy periodically going forward.
The Board of Directors has overall responsibility for the establishment and oversight of the risk management framework. The Board reviews and agrees policies for managing the Group’s financial risks as summarised below.
(b) Credit Risk
Credit risk is the risk of financial loss to the Group if a customer or counterparty to a financial instrument fails to meet its contractual obligations. This arises principally from cash and cash equivalents and trade and other receivables.
There are no significant concentrations of credit risk within the Group. The carrying amount of the Group’s financial assets represents the maximum credit risk exposure, as represented below:
2018 |
2017 |
|
$ |
$ |
|
Financial assets |
||
Cash and cash equivalents |
5,709,446 |
15,596,759 |
Trade and other receivables |
227,273 |
300,058 |
5,936,719 |
15,896,817 |
With respect to credit risk arising from cash and cash equivalents, the Group’s exposure to credit risk arises from default of the counter party, with a maximum exposure equal to the carrying amount of these instruments. Where possible, the Group invests its cash and cash equivalents with banks that are rated the equivalent of investment grade and above. The Group’s exposure and the credit ratings of its counterparties are continuously monitored and the aggregate value of transactions concluded is spread amongst approved counterparties.
The Group does not have any significant customers and accordingly does not have significant exposure to bad or doubtful debts.
Trade and other receivables comprise interest accrued and GST refunds due. Where possible the Consolidated Entity trades only with recognised, creditworthy third parties. Receivable balances are monitored on an ongoing basis with the result that the Group’s exposure to bad debts is not significant. At 30 June 2018, none (2017 none) of the Group’s receivables are past due.
(c) Liquidity Risk
Liquidity risk is the risk that the Group will not be able to meet its financial obligations as they fall due. The Board’s approach to managing liquidity is to ensure, as far as possible, that the Group will always have sufficient liquidity to meet its liabilities when due. At 30 June 2018 and 2017, the Group had sufficient liquid assets to meet its financial obligations.
The contractual maturities of financial liabilities, including estimated interest payments, are provided below. There are no netting arrangements in respect of financial liabilities.
≤6 Months $ |
6-12 Months |
1-5 Years $ |
≥5 Years $ |
Total $ |
|
2018 |
|||||
Financial Liabilities |
|||||
Finance lease |
5,914 |
5,915 |
38,992 |
– |
50,821 |
Trade and other payables |
1,620,527 |
– |
– |
– |
1,620,527 |
1,626,441 |
5,915 |
38,992 |
– |
1,671,348 |
|
2017 |
|||||
Financial Liabilities |
|||||
Finance lease |
5,914 |
5,914 |
50,821 |
– |
62,649 |
Trade and other payables |
1,348,791 |
– |
– |
– |
1,348,791 |
1,354,705 |
5,914 |
50,821 |
– |
1,411,440 |
(d) Interest Rate Risk
The Group does not have any long-term borrowing or long term deposits, which would expose it to significant cash flow interest rate risk.
The Group currently does not engage in any hedging or derivative transactions to manage interest rate risk.
(e) Capital Management
The Group defines its Capital as total equity of the Group, being $7,019,989 as at 30 June 2018 (2017: $17,046,443). The Group manages its capital to ensure that entities in the Group will be able to continue as a going concern while financing the development of its projects through primarily equity based financing. The Board’s policy is to maintain a strong capital base so as to maintain investor, creditor and market confidence and to sustain future development of the business. Given the stage of development of the Group, the Board’s objective is to minimise debt and to raise funds as required through the issue of new shares.
The Group is not subject to externally imposed capital requirements.
There were no changes in the Group’s approach to capital management during the year. During the next 12 months, the Group will continue to explore project financing opportunities, primarily consisting of additional issues of equity.
(f) Fair Value
The Group uses various methods in estimating the fair value of a financial instrument. The methods comprise:
· Level 1 – the fair value is calculated using quoted prices in active markets.
· Level 2 – the fair value is estimated using inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly (as prices) or indirectly (derived from prices).
· Level 3 – the fair value is estimated using inputs for the asset or liability that are not based on observable market data.
At 30 June 2018 and 30 June 2017, the carrying value of the Group’s financial assets and liabilities approximate their fair value.
23. CONTINGENT ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
(i) Contingent Assets
As at the date of this report, no contingent assets had been identified in relation to the 30 June 2018 financial year.
(ii) Contingent Liability
As at the date of this report, no contingent liabilities had been identified in relation to the 30 June 2018 financial year.
24. COMMITMENTS
Management have identified the following material commitments for the consolidated group as at 30 June 2018 and 30 June 2017:
2018 |
2017 |
|
$ |
$ |
|
Exploration commitments |
||
Within one year |
1,896,500 |
1,061,000 |
Later than one year but not later than five years |
– |
– |
1,896,500 |
1,061,000 |
25. EVENTS SUBSEQUENT TO BALANCE DATE
(i) Announced the results from a Scoping Study on the Lake Wells project which confirmed its potential to produce low cost SOP by solar evaporation of lake brines for domestic and international fertiliser markets; and
(ii) On 10 August 2018, the Company appointed Mr Clint McGhie as Company Secretary and Chief Financial Officer following the resignation of Mr Sam Cordin.
Other than as above, as at the date of this report there are no matters or circumstances which have arisen since 30 June 2018 that have significantly affected or may significantly affect:
· the operations, in financial years subsequent to 30 June 2018, of the Consolidated Entity;
· the results of those operations, in financial years subsequent to 30 June 2018, of the Consolidated Entity; or
· the state of affairs, in financial years subsequent to 30 June 2018, of the Consolidated Entity.
ASX ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
1. TWENTY LARGEST HOLDERS OF LISTED SECURITIES
The names of the twenty largest holders of listed securities as at 31 August 2018 are listed below:
Name |
Number of |
Percentage of Ordinary Shares |
COMPUTERSHARE CLEARING PTY LTD |
43,433,570 |
24.81 |
ARREDO PTY LTD |
11,000,000 |
6.28 |
CITICORP NOMINEES PTY LIMITED |
8,804,536 |
5.03 |
PERSHING AUSTRALIA NOMINEES PTY LTD |
8,016,017 |
4.58 |
HOWITT MGMT PTY LTD |
4,620,000 |
2.64 |
HOPETOUN CONSULTING PTY LTD |
4,500,000 |
2.57 |
MR MARK STUART SAVAGE |
3,600,000 |
2.06 |
AWJ FAMILY PTY LTD |
3,020,000 |
1.73 |
HSBC CUSTODY NOMINEES (AUSTRALIA) LIMITED |
3,006,923 |
1.72 |
J P MORGAN NOMINEES AUSTRALIA LIMITED |
2,720,100 |
1.55 |
AROIDA INVESTMENTS PTY LTD |
2,439,636 |
1.39 |
MR NEIL DAVID IRVINE |
2,307,493 |
1.32 |
AEGEAN CAPITAL PTY LTD |
2,237,749 |
1.28 |
MR TERRY PATRICK COFFEY & HAWKES BAY NOMINEES LIMITED |
2,230,064 |
1.27 |
BELL POTTER NOMINEES LTD |
2,018,721 |
1.15 |
ROSEBERRY HOLDINGS PTY LTD |
2,000,000 |
1.14 |
APOLLO GROUP PTY LTD |
2,000,000 |
1.14 |
SUNSET CAPITAL MANAGEMENT PTY LTD |
1,800,000 |
1.03 |
VYNBEN PTY LTD |
1,725,498 |
0.99 |
D GRAY & CO PTY LTD |
1,610,000 |
0.92 |
Total Top 20 |
113,090,307 |
64.60 |
Others |
61,959,289 |
35.40 |
Total Ordinary Shares on Issue |
175,049,596 |
100.00 |
2. DISTRIBUTION OF EQUITY SECURITIES
An analysis of numbers of holders of listed securities by size of holding as at 31 August 2018 is listed below:
Ordinary Shares |
||
Distribution |
Number of |
Number of |
1 – 1,000 |
1,101 |
300,105 |
1,001 – 5,000 |
399 |
1,031,382 |
5,001 – 10,000 |
157 |
1,222,564 |
10,001 – 100,000 |
326 |
13,141,101 |
More than 100,000 |
140 |
159,354,444 |
Totals |
2,123 |
175,049,596 |
There were 1,135 holders of less than a marketable parcel of Ordinary Shares.
3. VOTING RIGHTS
See Note 13(b) of the Notes to the Financial Statements.
4. SUBSTANTIAL SHAREHOLDERS
Substantial holders who have notified the Company in accordance with section 671B of the Corporations Act 2001are as follows:
Distribution |
Number of |
Lombard Odier Asset Management (Europe) Limited |
17,071,000 |
Arredo Pty Ltd |
11,000,000 |
5. UNQUOTED SECURITIES
Performance Shares |
Performance Shares Subject to Pre-Feasibility Study Milestone (Class A) expiring |
Performance Shares Subject to Definitive Feasibility Study Milestone (Class B) expiring |
Performance Shares Subject to Construction Milestone (Class C) expiring |
Holder |
31-Dec-18 |
31-Dec-19 |
12-Jun-20 |
JBJF Management Pty Ltd |
1,700,000 |
2,550,000 |
3,400,000 |
Mr Aharon Arakel & Mrs Ida Arakel |
1,650,000 |
2,475,000 |
3,300,000 |
Howitt MGMT Pty Ltd |
1,540,000 |
2,310,000 |
3,080,000 |
Others (less than 20%) |
110,000 |
165,000 |
220,000 |
Total |
5,000,000 |
7,500,000 |
10,000,000 |
Total holders |
4 |
4 |
4
|
Unlisted Options |
Unlisted Options exercisable |
Unlisted Options exercisable |
Unlisted Options exercisable |
Unlisted Options exercisable |
Unlisted Options exercisable |
Unlisted Options |
Unlisted Options |
Holder |
29-Apr-19 |
29-Apr-20 |
29-Apr-21 |
30-Jun-21 |
30-Jun-21 |
30-Jun-21 |
30-Jun-21 |
Hopetoun Consulting Pty Ltd |
750,000 |
750,000 |
1,000,000 |
– |
– |
– |
– |
JJB Advisory Limited |
– |
– |
– |
250,000 |
350,000 |
500,000 |
– |
Mr Sapan Ghai |
– |
– |
– |
– |
100,000 |
150,000 |
250,000 |
Mr Hannes Huster |
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
100,000 |
150,000 |
Others (less than 20%) |
– |
– |
– |
– |
50,000 |
– |
– |
Total |
750,000 |
750,000 |
1,000,000 |
250,000 |
500,000 |
750,000 |
400,000 |
Total holders |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
3 |
2 |
As at 31 August 2018, there are 5,400,000 Performance Rights issued under an employee incentive scheme.
6. ON-MARKET BUYBACK
There is currently no on-market buyback program for any of Salt Lake Potash Limited’s listed securities.
7. EXPLORATION INTERESTS
Summary of Exploration and Mining Tenements held as at 31 August 2018
Project |
Status |
License Number |
Area (km2) |
Interest (%) |
Western Australia |
||||
Lake Wells |
Granted |
E38/2710 |
192.2 |
100% |
Granted |
E38/2821 |
131.5 |
100% |
|
Granted |
E38/2824 |
198.2 |
100% |
|
Granted |
E38/3055 |
298.8 |
100% |
|
Granted |
E38/3056 |
3.0 |
100% |
|
Granted |
E38/3057 |
301.9 |
100% |
|
Granted |
E38/3124 |
39.0 |
100% |
|
Granted |
L38/262 |
113.0 |
100% |
|
Granted |
L38/263 |
28.6 |
100% |
|
Granted |
L38/264 |
32.6 |
100% |
|
Granted |
E38/3247 |
350.3 |
100% |
|
Application |
M38/1278 |
87.5 |
100% |
|
Lake Way |
Granted |
E53/1878 |
217.0 |
100% |
Application |
E53/1897 |
77.5 |
100% |
|
Lake Ballard |
Granted |
E29/912 |
607.0 |
100% |
Granted |
E29/913 |
73.2 |
100% |
|
Granted |
E29/958 |
30.0 |
100% |
|
Granted |
E29/1011 |
68.2 |
100% |
|
Granted |
E29/1020 |
9.3 |
100% |
|
Granted |
E29/1021 |
27.9 |
100% |
|
Granted |
E29/1022 |
43.4 |
100% |
|
Lake Marmion |
Granted |
E29/1000 |
167.4 |
100% |
Granted |
E29/1001 |
204.6 |
100% |
|
Granted |
E29/1002 |
186.0 |
100% |
|
Granted |
E29/1005 |
68.2 |
100% |
|
Lake Irwin |
Granted |
E37/1233 |
203.0 |
100% |
Granted |
E39/1892 |
203.0 |
100% |
|
Granted |
E38/3087 |
139.2 |
100% |
|
Granted |
E37/1261 |
107.3 |
100% |
|
Granted |
E38/3113 |
203.0 |
100% |
|
Granted |
E39/1955 |
118.9 |
100% |
|
Granted |
E37/1260 |
203.0 |
100% |
|
Granted |
E39/1956 |
110.2 |
100% |
|
Lake Minigwal |
Granted |
E39/1893 |
246.2 |
100% |
Granted |
E39/1894 |
158.1 |
100% |
|
Granted |
E39/1962 |
369.0 |
100% |
|
Granted |
E39/1963 |
93.0 |
100% |
|
Granted |
E39/1964 |
99.0 |
100% |
|
Granted |
E39/1965 |
89.9 |
100% |
|
Lake Noondie |
Granted |
E57/1062 |
217.0 |
100% |
Granted |
E57/1063 |
217.0 |
100% |
|
Granted |
E57/1064 |
55.8 |
100% |
|
Granted |
E57/1065 |
120.9 |
100% |
|
Granted |
E36/932 |
108.5 |
100% |
|
Lake Barlee |
Granted |
E77/2441 |
173.6 |
100% |
Granted |
E30/495 |
217.0 |
100% |
|
Granted |
E30/496 |
217.0 |
100% |
|
Lake Raeside |
Granted |
E37/1305 |
155.0 |
100% |
Lake Austin |
Application |
E21/205 |
117.8 |
100% |
Application |
E21/206 |
192.2 |
100% |
|
Application |
E58/529 |
213.9 |
100% |
|
Application |
E58/530 |
217.0 |
100% |
|
Application |
E58/531 |
96.1 |
100% |
|
Lake Moore |
Application |
E59/2340 |
217.0 |
100% |
Application |
E59/2341 |
217.0 |
100% |
|
Application |
E59/2342 |
217.0 |
100% |
|
Application |
E59/2343 |
201.5 |
100% |
|
Application |
E59/2344 |
217.0 |
100% |
|
Application |
E70/5195 |
124.0 |
100% |
|
Northern Territory |
||||
Lake Lewis |
Granted |
EL 29787 |
146.4 |
100% |
Granted |
EL 29903 |
125.1 |
100% |
8. MINERAL RESOURCES STATEMENT
Salt Lake’s Mineral Resource Statement as at 30 June 2018 is grouped by deposit, all of which form part of the Lake Wells SOP in Western Australia. To date, no Ore Reserves have been reported for these deposits. Subsequent to 30 June 2018, the Company reported a Mineral Resource Estimate for Lake Way. The Lake Way Mineral Resource does not form part of this statement.
Governance
The Company engages external consultants and Competent Persons (as determined pursuant to the JORC Code 2012) to prepare and estimate the Mineral Resources. Management and the Board review these estimates and underlying assumptions for reasonableness and accuracy. The results of the Mineral Resource estimates are then reported in accordance with the requirements of the JORC Code 2012 and other applicable rules (including ASX Listing Rules).
Where material changes occur during the year to the project, including the project’s size, title, exploration results or other technical information, previous resource estimates and market disclosures are reviewed for completeness.
The Company reviews its Mineral Resources as at 30 June each year. A revised Mineral Resource estimate will be prepared as part of the annual review process where a material change has occurred in the assumptions or data used in previously reported Mineral Resources. However, there are circumstances where this may not be possible (e.g. an ongoing drilling programme), in which case a revised Mineral Resource estimate will be prepared and reported as soon as practicable.
Results of Annual Review
In November 2015, the Company reported its maiden JORC Mineral Resource estimate for the Lake Wells Project, totalling 29 million tonnes (Mt) of Sulphate of Potash (SOP) with approximately 80% in the ‘Measured’ category with excellent brine chemistry of 4,009 mg/L Potassium (K), 19,175 mg/L (SO4). The resource was calculated only on the upper 16 metres of the Lake, with mineralisation remaining open at depth across most of the Lake.
In February 2016, an expanded Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE) was calculated at Lake Wells totalling 80-85 million tonnes of SOP. This represents an additional 51-56 Mt of Inferred Resource calculated in the strata below the previously reported shallow Resource of 29 Mt.
During the year ended 30 June 2018, the Company continued exploration and development activities for Lake Wells including surface aquifer characterisation (test pits and trenches), deep aquifer exploration, long term pump testing, evaporation pond trials and process testwork.
In addition, in March 2018, the Company released an initial estimate of Exploration Targets for eight of the nine lakes comprising the GSLP. The ninth lake, Lake Wells (as discussed above) already has a Mineral Resource reported in accordance with the JORC code.
The total “stored” Exploration Target for the GSLP is 290Mt – 458Mt of contained SOP, with an average SOP grade of 4.4 – 7.1kg/m3 (including Lake Wells’ Mineral Resource of 80-85Mt). On a “drainable” basis the total Exploration Target ranges from 26Mt – 153Mt of SOP. The total playa area of the lakes is approximately 3,312km2. The potential quantity and grade of this Exploration Target is conceptual in nature. There has been insufficient exploration to estimate a Mineral Resource and it is uncertain if further exploration will result in the estimation of a Mineral Resource.
As a result of the annual review of the Company’s Mineral Resources, there has been no change to the Mineral Resources reported for the Lake Wells Project in February 2016 as at 30 June 2018.
Total Mineral Resource Estimate
Classification |
Geological Unit |
Bulk Volume (Million m3) |
Porosity |
Brine Volume (Million m3) |
Average SOP1(K2SO4) Concentration (kg/m3) |
K2SO4Tonnage (Mt) |
Measured |
Playa Lake Sediments |
5,427 |
0.464 |
2,518 |
8.94 |
23 |
Indicated |
Playa Lake Sediments |
775 |
0.464 |
359 |
8.49 |
3 |
Inferred |
Playa Lake Sediments (Islands) |
1,204 |
0.464 |
558 |
5.34 |
3 |
Inferred |
Paleovalley Sediment |
10,600 |
0.40 |
4,240 |
9.07 |
38 |
Inferred |
Fractured Siltstone Aquifer |
6,717 |
0.22-.30 |
1,478 – 2,015 |
8.79 |
13-18 |
Competent Person Statement – Mineral Resource Statement
The information in this Mineral Resource Statement that relates to Mineral Resources is based on, and fairly represents, information compiled by Mr Ben Jeuken, a Competent Person, who is a member Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. Mr Jeuken is employed by Groundwater Science Pty Ltd, an independent consulting company. Mr Jeuken has sufficient experience, which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity, which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’.
Mr Jeuken has approved the Mineral Resource Statement as a whole and consents to its inclusion in the form and context in which it appears.
9. COMPETENT PERSONS STATEMENTS
The information in this report that relates to the Lake Way Mineral Resource is extracted from the report entitled ‘Scoping Study for Low Capex, High Margin Demonstration Plant at Lake Way’ dated 31 July 2018. This announcement is available to view on www.saltlakepotash.com.au. The information in the original ASX Announcement that related to Mineral Resources was based on, and fairly represents, information compiled by Mr Ben Jeuken, who is a member Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy and a member of the International Association of Hydrogeologists. Mr Jeuken is employed by Groundwater Science Pty Ltd, an independent consulting company. Mr Jeuken has sufficient experience, which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity, which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Salt Lake Potash Limited confirms that it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in the original market announcement and, in the case of estimates of Mineral Resources, that all material assumptions and technical parameters underpinning the estimates in the relevant market announcement continue to apply and have not materially changed. Salt Lake Potash Limited confirms that the form and context in which the Competent Person’s findings are presented have not been materially modified from the original market announcement.
The information in this report that relates to the Lake Wells Mineral Resource is extracted from the reports entitled ‘Lake Wells Resource Increased by 193% to 85Mt of SOP’ dated 22 February 2016 and ‘Significant Maiden SOP Resource of 29Mt at Lake Wells’ dated 11 November 2015. These announcements are available to view on www.saltlakepotash.com.au. The information in the original ASX Announcements that related to Mineral Resources was based on, and fairly represents, information compiled by Mr Ben Jeuken, who is a member Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy and a member of the International Association of Hydrogeologists. Mr Jeuken is employed by Groundwater Science Pty Ltd, an independent consulting company. Mr Jeuken has sufficient experience, which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity, which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Salt Lake Potash Limited confirms that it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in the original market announcement and, in the case of estimates of Mineral Resources, that all material assumptions and technical parameters underpinning the estimates in the relevant market announcement continue to apply and have not materially changed. Salt Lake Potash Limited confirms that the form and context in which the Competent Person’s findings are presented have not been materially modified from the original market announcement.
The information in this report that relates to Exploration Targets is extracted from the report entitled ‘Exploration Targets Reveal World Class Scale Potential’ dated 28 March 2018 The information in the original ASX Announcement that related to Exploration Targets or Mineral Resources is based on information compiled by Mr Ben Jeuken, who is a member Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. Mr Jeuken is employed by Groundwater Science Pty Ltd, an independent consulting company. Mr Jeuken has sufficient experience, which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity, which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Mr Jeuken consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears. The Company confirms that it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in the original market announcement. The Company confirms that the form and context in which the Competent Person’s findings are presented have not been materially modified from the original market announcement.
10. PRODUCTION TARGET
The Lake Way Demonstration Plant Production Target stated in this report is based on the Company’s Scoping Study as released to the ASX on 31 July 2018. The information in relation to the Production Target that the Company is required to include in a public report in accordance with ASX Listing Rule 5.16 and 5.17 was included in the Company’s ASX Announcement released on 31 July 2018. The Company confirms that the material assumptions underpinning the Production Target referenced in the 31 July 2018 release continue to apply and have not materially changed.
The Lake Wells Production Target stated in this report is based on the Company’s Scoping Study as released to the ASX on 29 August 2016. The information in relation to the Production Target that the Company is required to include in a public report in accordance with ASX Listing Rule 5.16 and 5.17 was included in the Company’s ASX Announcement released on 29 August 2016. The Company confirms that the material assumptions underpinning the Production Target referenced in the 29 August 2016 release continue to apply and have not materially changed.
11. FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
This report contains ‘forward-looking information’ that is based on the Company’s expectations, estimates and projections as of the date on which the statements were made. This forward-looking information includes, among other things, statements with respect to pre-feasibility and definitive feasibility studies, the Company’s business strategy, plans, development, objectives, performance, outlook, growth, cash flow, projections, targets and expectations, mineral reserves and resources, results of exploration and related expenses. Generally, this forward-looking information can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as ‘outlook’, ‘anticipate’, ‘project’, ‘target’, ‘potential’, ‘likely’, ‘believe’, ‘estimate’, ‘expect’, ‘intend’, ‘may’, ‘would’, ‘could’, ‘should’, ‘scheduled’, ‘will’, ‘plan’, ‘forecast’, ‘evolve’ and similar expressions. Persons reading this news release are cautioned that such statements are only predictions, and that the Company’s actual future results or performance may be materially different. Forward-looking information is subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the Company’s actual results, level of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking information. Forward-looking information is developed based on assumptions about such risks, uncertainties and other factors set out herein, including but not limited to the risk factors set out in Schedule 2 of the Company’s Notice of General Meeting and Explanatory Memorandum dated 8 May 2015.
The full version of the 2018 Annual Report is available on the Company’s website at www.saltlakepotash.com.au |
Salt Lake Potash #SO4 & Australian Potash ASX: #APC to Study Benefits of Cost Sharing at Lake Wells
Salt Lake Potash#SO4 & Australian Potash ASX: #APC to Study Benefits of Cost Sharing at Lake Wells
Highlights:
- Salt Lake Potash Limited (ASX/AIM: SO4) and Australian Potash Limited (ASX: APC) have entered into a Memorandum of Understanding and Co-operation Agreement to study the potentially very substantial benefits of sharing infrastructure and other costs at Lake Wells
- The Companies will conduct a joint study into the merits of developing aspects of their respective Lake Wells projects together (the ‘Study’)
- The Study will initially focus on a shared costs model around infrastructure developments
- The Study will also address at a high-level the potential for cost sharing on common evaporation and salt processing developments
- Both Companies’ projects at Lake Wells will proceed independently in parallel with the Study with no impact on either Company’s timelines
Salt Lake Potash Limited (ASX/AIM: SO4) and Australian Potash Limited (ASX: APC) are pleased to advise that the Companies have entered into a Memorandum of Understanding and Co-operation Agreement to undertake a joint study of the potential benefits of development cost sharing for each Company’s project developments at Lake Wells.
The Companies’ substantial project holdings at Lake Wells are contiguous with many common infrastructure elements, including access roads, proximity to the Leonora rail terminals, and potential power and fresh water solutions. Both Companies anticipate substantial potential Capex and Opex benefits from some level of infrastructure sharing, with further potential benefits arising from shared or common evaporation and salt processing facilities.
A paleochannel extending in excess of 140 kilometres traverses the Companies combined tenement holding over Lake Wells. Recently both APC and SO4 have been granted initial Mining Leases over their respective projects at Lake Wells.
APC’s scoping study released in March 2017 indicated a staged development producing 150,000 tpa rising to 300,000 tpai of premium grade Sulphate of Potash (SOP) from its stand-alone development. APC has a 2012 JORC Mineral Resource Estimate (calculated from drainable porosity) of 14.7 Mti of SOP (derived from a total of 72 Mt contained in total porosity).
SO4’s scoping study released in August 2016 indicated a staged development producing 200,000 tpa rising to 400,000 tpa on a fully ramped basis. SO4 has reported a total JORC Mineral Resource at Lake Wells of 80-85 Mt of SOP (Stored Resource).
Logistics and Infrastructure
Each Company’s project is based on heavy haulage road transport from Lake Wells to the rail head at either Malcolm (280kms) or Leonora (300kms), utilising the same haulage route. There is compelling logic in pursuing the economies of scale inherent in a (larger) shared solution as well as sharing the capital costs for road upgrades, haulage equipment and other transport and handling facilities. There is similar synergy potential in shared power, air transport, accommodation and process water costs.
Both projects have very similar brine chemistry given they are essentially hosted on the same paleochannel. Naturally they will also experience the same climatic conditions, meaning the process flowsheets for each project should be very similar. This offers the opportunity for potential additional savings by a co-operative arrangement extending to evaporation and salt processing facilities.
The Companies have agreed to constitute a joint study team to carry out an initial assessment of the merits of infrastructure cooperation. The team will also conduct a high-level review of potential benefits of upstream operational synergies. A substantial part of the Study work will be outsourced to independent engineers and both Companies intend to continue with their independent project developments in parallel with the Study.
Follow Salt Lake Potash on Twitter @LakePotash
For further information please visit www.saltlakepotash.com.au or contact:
Matt Syme/Clint McGhie |
Salt Lake Potash Limited |
Tel: +61 8 9322 6322 |
Jo Battershill |
Salt Lake Potash Limited |
Tel: +44 (0) 20 7478 3900 |
Colin Aaronson/Richard Tonthat/Ben Roberts |
Grant Thornton UK LLP (Nominated Adviser) |
Tel: +44 (0) 20 7383 5100 |
Derrick Lee/Beth McKiernan |
Cenkos Securities plc (Joint Broker) |
Tel: +44 (0) 131 220 6939 |
Jerry Keen/Toby Gibbs
|
Shore Capital (Joint broker) |
Tel: +44 (0) 20 7468 7967
|
Competent Person Statements
The information in this Announcement that relates to APC’s Exploration Targets and Mineral Resources is based on information that was compiled by Mr Duncan Gareth Storey. Mr Storey is a Director and Consulting Hydrogeologist with AQ2, a firm that provides consulting services to the Company. Neither Mr Storey nor AQ2 own either directly or indirectly any securities in the issued capital of the Company. Mr Storey has 30 years of international experience. He is a Chartered Geologist with, and Fellow of, the Geological Society of London (a Recognised Professional Organisation under the JORC Code 2012). My Storey has experience in the assessment and development of paleochannel aquifers, including the development of hypersaline brines in Western Australia. His experience and expertise are such that he qualifies as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 edition of the “Australian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore reserves”. Mr Storey consents to the inclusion in this report of the matters based on this information in the form and context as it appears.
The information in this Announcement that relates to Salt Lake Potash Limited’s Mineral Resources is extracted from the reports entitled ‘Lake Wells Resource Increased by 193% to 85Mt of SOP’ dated 22 February 2016 and ‘Significant Maiden SOP Resource of 29Mt at Lake Wells’ dated 11 November 2015. These announcements are available to view on www.saltlakepotash.com.au. The information in the original ASX Announcements that related to Mineral Resources was based on, and fairly represents, information compiled by Mr Ben Jeuken, who is a member Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy and a member of the International Association of Hydrogeologists. Mr Jeuken is employed by Groundwater Science Pty Ltd, an independent consulting company. Mr Jeuken has sufficient experience, which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity, which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Salt Lake Potash Limited confirms that it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in the original market announcement and, in the case of estimates of Mineral Resources, that all material assumptions and technical parameters underpinning the estimates in the relevant market announcement continue to apply and have not materially changed. Salt Lake Potash Limited confirms that the form and context in which the Competent Person’s findings are presented have not been materially modified from the original market announcement.
The information in this Announcement that relates to Salt Lake Potash Limited’s Lake Wells Scoping Study is extracted from the report entitled ‘Scoping Study Confirms Potential Confirms Lake Wells Potential’ dated 29 August 2016. The Announcement is available to view on www.saltlakepotash.com.au. The information in the original announcement that relates to processing, infrastructure and cost estimation are based on and fairly represents information compiled or reviewed by Mr Zeyad El-Ansary, who is a Competent Person as a member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. Mr Zeyad El-Ansary has 9 years’ experience relevant to the activities undertaken for preparation of these report sections and is a employed by Amec Foster Wheeler. Mr Zeyad El-Ansary consents to the inclusion in the report/press release of the matters based on their information in the form and context in which it appears. Salt Lake Potash Limited confirms that it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in the original market announcement. Salt Lake Potash Limited confirms that the form and context in which the Competent Person’s findings are presented have not been materially modified from the original market announcement.
Production Target
Australian Potash Limited’s Lake Wells SOP Project’s Production Target, as stated in this Announcement is based on the it’s Scoping Study as released in the ASX announcement of 23 March 2017 ‘Scoping Study Confirms Exceptional Economics of APC’s 100% Owned Lake Wells Potash Project In WA’. That announcement contains the relevant statements, data and consents referred to in this announcement. Apart from that which is disclosed in this document, Australian Potash Limited, its directors, officers and agents: 1. Are not aware of any new information that materially affects the information contained in the 23 March 2017 announcement, and 2. State that the material assumptions and technical parameters underpinning the estimates in the 23 March 2017 announcement continue to apply and have not materially changed.
Salt Lake Potash Limited’s Lake Wells Production Target stated in this Announcement is based on it’s Scoping Study as released to the ASX on 29 August 2016. The information in relation to the Production Target that Salt Lake Potash Limited is required to include in a public report in accordance with ASX Listing Rule 5.16 and 5.17 was included in its ASX Announcement released on 29 August 2016. Salt Lake Potash Limited confirms that the material assumptions underpinning the Production Target referenced in the 29 August 2016 release continue to apply and have not materially changed.
Note
i Refer to ASX announcement 23 March 2017 ‘Scoping Study Confirms Exceptional Economics of APC’s 100% Owned Lake Wells Potash Project In WA’. That announcement contains the relevant statements, data and consents referred to in this announcement. Apart from that which is disclosed in this document, Australian Potash Limited, its directors, officers and agents: 1. Are not aware of any new information that materially affects the information contained in the 23 March 2017 announcement, and 2. State that the material assumptions and technical parameters underpinning the estimates in the 23 March 2017 announcement continue to apply and have not materially changed.
The Companies will conduct a joint study into the merits of developing aspects of their respective Lake Wells projects together (the ‘Study’) The Study will initially focus on a shared costs model around infrastructure developments