Home » Prairie Mining (PDZ) (Page 4)
Category Archives: Prairie Mining (PDZ)
Prairie Mining: Ceasing to be a substantial holder
Notice of Initial Substantial Holder
On 1 June 2018, Prairie Mining Limited (Company) was notified via the filing of a Form 605 with ASX that JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its affiliates (JPMorgan) had provided notice of it ceasing to be a substantial holder (as defined by the Corporations Act 2001) of the Company as of 30 May 2018, due to the dilution as a result of a share issue. JPMorgan continues to hold 8,926,195 ordinary shares, representing 4.21% of the Company’s issued share capital.
For further information please contact:
Prairie Mining Limited |
Tel: +44 207 478 3900 |
Ben Stoikovich, Chief Executive Officer |
Email: info@pdz.com.au |
Sapan Ghai, Head of Corporate Development |
Prairie Mining Ltd #PDZ Change of Director’s Interest Notice
Information or documents not available now must be given to ASX as soon as available. Information and documents given to ASX become ASX’s property and may be made public.
Introduced 30/09/01 Amended 01/01/11
Name of entity Prairie Mining Limited |
ABN 23 008 677 852 |
We (the entity) give ASX the following information under listing rule 3.19A.2 and as agent for the director for the purposes of section 205G of the Corporations Act.
Name of Director |
Carmel Daniele |
Date of last notice |
25 August 2017 |
Part 1 – Change of director’s relevant interests in securities
In the case of a trust, this includes interests in the trust made available by the responsible entity of the trust
Note: In the case of a company, interests which come within paragraph (i) of the definition of “notifiable interest of a director” should be disclosed in this part.
Direct or indirect interest |
Indirect |
Nature of indirect interest (including registered holder) Note: Provide details of the circumstances giving rise to the relevant interest. |
Controller of CD Capital Natural Resources Fund III LP |
Date of change |
30 May 2018 |
No. of securities held prior to change |
A. Nil B. Nil C. 44,776,120 D. 5,711,804 |
Class |
A. Ordinary fully paid shares B. Unlisted options exercisable at $0.60 each on or before 30 May 2021 C. Convertible loan note convertible into ordinary shares at $0.335 per share with no expiry date D. Convertible loan note convertible into ordinary shares at $0.46 per share with no expiry date |
Number acquired |
A. 44,776,120 B. 22,388,060 C. Nil D. Nil |
Number disposed |
A. Nil B. Nil C. (44,776,120) D. Nil |
Value/Consideration Note: If consideration is non-cash, provide details and estimated valuation |
See nature of change below |
No. of securities held after change |
A. 44,776,120 B. 22,388,060 C. Nil D. 5,711,804 |
Nature of change Example: on-market trade, off-market trade, exercise of options, issue of securities under dividend reinvestment plan, participation in buy-back |
Conversion of the convertible loan note with a principal amount of $15,000,000, exchangeable into 44,776,120 ordinary shares at a conversion price of $0.335 per share and the subsequent issue of unlisted options on conversion of convertible note |
Part 2 – Change of director’s interests in contracts
Note: In the case of a company, interests which come within paragraph (ii) of the definition of “notifiable interest of a director” should be disclosed in this part.
Detail of contract |
Convertible Loan Note Instruments |
Nature of interest |
Controller of CD Capital Natural Resources Fund III LP (holder of right to acquire shares of Prairie Mining Limited pursuant to the above and below contracts). |
Name of registered holder (if issued securities) |
CD Capital Natural Resources Fund III LP |
Date of change |
30 May 2018 |
No. and class of securities to which interest related prior to change Note: Details are only required for a contract in relation to which the interest has changed |
Right of CD Capital Natural Resources Fund III LP to acquire 44,776,119 ordinary shares and 21,388,060 $0.60 unlisted options which may result in the issue of an additional 21,388,060 ordinary shares (“Loan Note 1”)
Right of CD Capital Natural Resources Fund III LP to acquire 5,711,804 ordinary shares in the Company pursuant to an investment agreement and convertible loan note instrument |
Interest acquired |
Nil |
Interest disposed |
Loan Note 1 |
Value/Consideration Note: If consideration is non-cash, provide details and an estimated valuation |
Not applicable |
Interest after change |
Right of CD Capital Natural Resources Fund III LP to acquire 5,711,804 ordinary shares in the Company pursuant to an investment agreement and convertible loan note instrument |
Part 3 – +Closed period
Were the interests in the securities or contracts detailed above traded during a +closed period where prior written clearance was required? |
Not applicable |
If so, was prior written clearance provided to allow the trade to proceed during this period? |
Not applicable |
If prior written clearance was provided, on what date was this provided? |
Not applicable |
Initial notification/Amendment |
Initial |
LEI |
213800EHCGNYSCN9T108 |
Place of transaction |
Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) |
Prairie Mining Ltd #PDZ Ceasing to be a substantial holder
On 1 June 2018, Prairie Mining Limited (Company) was notified via the filing of a Form 605 with ASX that Arredo Pty Ltd (Areddo) had provided notice of it ceasing to be a substantial holder (as defined by the Corporations Act 2001) of the Company as of 30 May 2018, due to the dilution as a result of a share issue. Arredo continues to hold 10,600,000 ordinary shares, representing 4.99% of the Company’s issued share capital.
For further information please contact:
Prairie Mining Limited
Tel: +44 207 478 3900
Ben Stoikovich, Chief Executive Officer
Email: info@pdz.com.au
Sapan Ghai, Head of Corporate Development
Prairie Mining #PDZ – Issue of shares on conversion of convertible note
Prairie Mining Limited #PDZ announces that 44,776,120 fully paid ordinary shares have been issued today upon conversion of the convertible loan note with a principal amount of $15,000,000, exchangeable into 44,776,120 ordinary shares at a conversion price of $0.335 per share (Loan Note 1) and the subsequent issue of 22,388,060 unlisted options exercisable at $0.60 each on or before 30 May 2021 on conversion of Loan Note 1.
An application will be made to the London Stock Exchange for the new ordinary shares, which rank pari passu with the Company’s existing issued ordinary shares, in due course and in any event within 12 months.
Following admission, the Company’s issued ordinary share capital will be 212,275,089 ordinary shares.
The above figure of 212,275,089 ordinary shares may be used by shareholders as the denominator for the calculations by which they will determine if they are required to notify their interest in, or a change to their interest in, the share capital of the Company, under the FCA’s Disclosure and Transparency Rules.
For further information, contact:
Prairie Mining Limited |
Tel: +44 207 478 3900 |
Ben Stoikovich, Chief Executive Officer |
Email: info@pdz.com.au |
Sapan Ghai, Head of Corporate Development |
Rule 2.7, 3.10.3, 3.10.4, 3.10.5
Appendix 3B
New issue announcement, application for quotation of additional securities and agreement
Information or documents not available now must be given to ASX as soon as available. Information and documents given to ASX become ASX’s property and may be made public.
Introduced 01/07/96 Origin: Appendix 5 Amended 01/07/98, 01/09/99, 01/07/00, 30/09/01, 11/03/02, 01/01/03, 24/10/05, 01/08/12, 04/03/13
Name of entity |
PRAIRIE MINING LIMITED |
ABN |
23 008 677 852 |
We (the entity) give ASX the following information.
Part 1 ‑ All issues
You must complete the relevant sections (attach sheets if there is not enough space).
1 |
+Class of +securities issued or to be issued |
a) Ordinary shares b) Unlisted options |
|||
2 |
Number of +securities issued or to be issued (if known) or maximum number which may be issued |
a) 44,776,120 b) 22,388,060
|
|||
3 |
Principal terms of the +securities (e.g. if options, exercise price and expiry date; if partly paid +securities, the amount outstanding and due dates for payment; if +convertible securities, the conversion price and dates for conversion) |
a) Ordinary fully paid shares b) Unlisted options exercisable at $0.60 each on or before 30 May 2021 |
|||
4 |
Do the +securities rank equally in all respects from the +issue date with an existing +class of quoted +securities?
If the additional +securities do not rank equally, please state: · the date from which they do · the extent to which they participate for the next dividend, (in the case of a trust, distribution) or interest payment · the extent to which they do not rank equally, other than in relation to the next dividend, distribution or interest payment |
a) Yes b) No – not listed
|
|||
5 |
Issue price or consideration
|
See below
|
|||
6 |
Purpose of the issue (If issued as consideration for the acquisition of assets, clearly identify those assets)
|
Conversion of the convertible loan note with a principal amount of $15,000,000, exchangeable into 44,776,120 ordinary shares at a conversion price of $0.335 per share (“Loan Note 1”) and the subsequent issue of unlisted options on conversion of Loan Note 1
|
|||
6a |
Is the entity an +eligible entity that has obtained security holder approval under rule 7.1A?
If Yes, complete sections 6b – 6h in relation to the +securities the subject of this Appendix 3B, and comply with section 6i |
No |
|||
6b |
The date the security holder resolution under rule 7.1A was passed |
Not applicable
|
|||
6c |
Number of +securities issued without security holder approval under rule 7.1 |
Nil
|
|||
6d |
Number of +securities issued with security holder approval under rule 7.1A |
Not applicable
|
|||
6e |
Number of +securities issued with security holder approval under rule 7.3, or another specific security holder approval (specify date of meeting)
|
67,164,180 – 21 September 2015
|
|||
6f |
Number of +securities issued under an exception in rule 7.2 |
Not applicable
|
|||
6g |
If +securities issued under rule 7.1A, was issue price at least 75% of 15 day VWAP as calculated under rule 7.1A.3? Include the +issue date and both values. Include the source of the VWAP calculation. |
Not applicable |
|||
6h |
If +securities were issued under rule 7.1A for non-cash consideration, state date on which valuation of consideration was released to ASX Market Announcements |
Not applicable |
|||
6i |
Calculate the entity’s remaining issue capacity under rule 7.1 and rule 7.1A – complete Annexure 1 and release to ASX Market Announcements |
Rule 7.1 – 31,341,263 Rule 7.1A – Not applicable
|
|||
7 |
+Issue dates Note: The issue date may be prescribed by ASX (refer to the definition of issue date in rule 19.12). For example, the issue date for a pro rata entitlement issue must comply with the applicable timetable in Appendix 7A. Cross reference: item 33 of Appendix 3B. |
30 May 2018 |
|||
Number |
+Class |
||||
8 |
Number and +class of all +securities quoted on ASX (including the +securities in section 2 if applicable)
|
212,275,089 |
Ordinary Shares
|
||
Number |
+Class |
||||
9 |
Number and +class of all +securities not quoted on ASX (including the +securities in section 2 if applicable)
|
1,400,000
200,000
900,000
700,000
22,388,060
10,925,000
5,711,805 |
Options exercisable at $0.45 each on or before 30 June 2018
Options exercisable at $0.50 each on or before 31 March 2020
Options exercisable at $0.60 each on or before 31 March 2020
Options exercisable at $0.80 each on or before 31 March 2020
Options exercisable at $0.60 each on or before 30 May 2021
Performance share rights subject to various performance conditions to be satisfied prior to relevant milestones or expiry dates between 31 December 2018 and 31 December 2020
Convertible loan note with a principal amount of $2,627,430, convertible into 5,711,805 ordinary shares at a conversion price of $0.46 per share with no expiry date (“Loan Note 2”) |
||
10 |
Dividend policy (in the case of a trust, distribution policy) on the increased capital (interests) |
Not applicable |
|||
Part 2 ‑ Pro rata issue
11 |
Is security holder approval required?
|
Not applicable |
12 |
Is the issue renounceable or non-renounceable? |
Not applicable |
13 |
Ratio in which the +securities will be offered |
Not applicable |
14 |
+Class of +securities to which the offer relates |
Not applicable |
15 |
+Record date to determine entitlements |
Not applicable |
16 |
Will holdings on different registers (or subregisters) be aggregated for calculating entitlements? |
Not applicable |
17 |
Policy for deciding entitlements in relation to fractions
|
Not applicable |
18 |
Names of countries in which the entity has security holders who will not be sent new offer documents Note: Security holders must be told how their entitlements are to be dealt with. Cross reference: rule 7.7. |
Not applicable |
19 |
Closing date for receipt of acceptances or renunciations |
Not applicable |
|
||
20 |
Names of any underwriters
|
Not applicable |
21 |
Amount of any underwriting fee or commission |
Not applicable |
22 |
Names of any brokers to the issue
|
Not applicable |
23 |
Fee or commission payable to the broker to the issue |
Not applicable |
24 |
Amount of any handling fee payable to brokers who lodge acceptances or renunciations on behalf of security holders |
Not applicable |
25 |
If the issue is contingent on security holders’ approval, the date of the meeting |
Not applicable |
26 |
Date entitlement and acceptance form and offer documents will be sent to persons entitled |
Not applicable |
27 |
If the entity has issued options, and the terms entitle option holders to participate on exercise, the date on which notices will be sent to option holders |
Not applicable |
|
||
28 |
Date rights trading will begin (if applicable) |
Not applicable |
29 |
Date rights trading will end (if applicable)
|
Not applicable |
30 |
How do security holders sell their entitlements in fullthrough a broker? |
Not applicable |
31 |
How do security holders sell part of their entitlements through a broker and accept for the balance? |
Not applicable |
32 |
How do security holders dispose of their entitlements (except by sale through a broker)? |
Not applicable |
33 |
+Issue date
|
Not applicable |
Part 3 ‑ Quotation of securities
You need only complete this section if you are applying for quotation of securities
34 |
Type of +securities (tick one)
|
|
(a) |
+Securities described in Part 1 |
|
(b) |
All other +securities Example: restricted securities at the end of the escrowed period, partly paid securities that become fully paid, employee incentive share securities when restriction ends, securities issued on expiry or conversion of convertible securities |
Entities that have ticked box 34(a)
Additional securities forming a new class of securities
Tick to indicate you are providing the information or documents |
35 |
If the +securities are +equity securities, the names of the 20 largest holders of the additional +securities, and the number and percentage of additional +securities held by those holders |
|
36 |
If the +securities are +equity securities, a distribution schedule of the additional +securities setting out the number of holders in the categories 1 – 1,000 1,001 – 5,000 5,001 – 10,000 10,001 – 100,000 100,001 and over |
|
37 |
A copy of any trust deed for the additional +securities |
Entities that have ticked box 34(b)
38 |
Number of +securities for which +quotation is sought
|
Not applicable |
||
39 |
+Class of +securities for which quotation is sought
|
Not applicable |
||
40 |
Do the +securities rank equally in all respects from the +issue date with an existing +class of quoted +securities?
If the additional +securities do not rank equally, please state: · the date from which they do · the extent to which they participate for the next dividend, (in the case of a trust, distribution) or interest payment · the extent to which they do not rank equally, other than in relation to the next dividend, distribution or interest payment |
Not applicable |
||
41 |
Reason for request for quotation now Example: In the case of restricted securities, end of restriction period
(if issued upon conversion of another +security, clearly identify that other +security)
|
Not applicable |
||
Number |
+Class |
|||
42 |
Number and +class of all +securities quoted on ASX (including the +securities in clause 38)
|
Not applicable
|
Not applicable |
|
Quotation agreement
1 +Quotation of our additional +securities is in ASX’s absolute discretion. ASX may quote the +securities on any conditions it decides.
2 We warrant the following to ASX.
· The issue of the +securities to be quoted complies with the law and is not for an illegal purpose.
· There is no reason why those +securities should not be granted +quotation.
· An offer of the +securities for sale within 12 months after their issue will not require disclosure under section 707(3) or section 1012C(6) of the Corporations Act.
Note: An entity may need to obtain appropriate warranties from subscribers for the securities in order to be able to give this warranty
· Section 724 or section 1016E of the Corporations Act does not apply to any applications received by us in relation to any +securities to be quoted and that no-one has any right to return any +securities to be quoted under sections 737, 738 or 1016F of the Corporations Act at the time that we request that the +securities be quoted.
· If we are a trust, we warrant that no person has the right to return the +securities to be quoted under section 1019B of the Corporations Act at the time that we request that the +securities be quoted.
3 We will indemnify ASX to the fullest extent permitted by law in respect of any claim, action or expense arising from or connected with any breach of the warranties in this agreement.
4 We give ASX the information and documents required by this form. If any information or document is not available now, we will give it to ASX before +quotation of the +securities begins. We acknowledge that ASX is relying on the information and documents. We warrant that they are (will be) true and complete.
[signed electronically without signature]
Sign here: …………………………………………………… Date: 30 May 2018
(Director/Company secretary)
Print name: Dylan Browne
== == == == ==
Appendix 3B – Annexure 1
Calculation of placement capacity under rule 7.1 and rule 7.1A for eligible entities
Introduced 01/08/12 Amended 04/03/13
Part 1
Rule 7.1 – Issues exceeding 15% of capital |
||
Step 1: Calculate “A”, the base figure from which the placement capacity is calculated |
||
Insert number of fully paid +ordinary securities on issue 12 months before the +issue date or date of agreement to issue |
163,478,969 |
|
Add the following: • Number of fully paid +ordinary securities issued in that 12 month period under an exception in rule 7.2 • Number of fully paid +ordinary securities issued in that 12 month period with shareholder approval • Number of partly paid +ordinary securities that became fully paid in that 12 month period Note: • Include only ordinary securities here – other classes of equity securities cannot be added • Include here (if applicable) the securities the subject of the Appendix 3B to which this form is annexed • It may be useful to set out issues of securities on different dates as separate line items |
570,000 ordinary shares (9 June 2017) 2,110,000 ordinary shares (16 June 2017) 1,340,000 ordinary shares (6 July 2017) 44,776,120 ordinary shares (30 May 2018) |
|
Subtract the number of fully paid +ordinary securities cancelled during that 12 month period |
Nil |
|
“A” |
212,275,089 |
|
Step 2: Calculate 15% of “A” |
||
“B” |
0.15 [Note: this value cannot be changed] |
|
Multiply “A” by 0.15 |
31,841,263 |
|
Step 3: Calculate “C”, the amount of placement capacity under rule 7.1 that has already been used |
||
Insert number of +equity securities issued or agreed to be issued in that 12 month period not counting those issued: • Under an exception in rule 7.2 • Under rule 7.1A • With security holder approval under rule 7.1 or rule 7.4 Note: • This applies to equity securities, unless specifically excluded – not just ordinary securities • Include here (if applicable) the securities the subject of the Appendix 3B to which this form is annexed • It may be useful to set out issues of securities on different dates as separate line items |
500,000 Incentive options (15 Sep 2017)
|
|
“C” |
500,000 |
|
Step 4: Subtract “C” from [“A” x “B”] to calculate remaining placement capacity under rule 7.1 |
||
“A” x 0.15 Note: number must be same as shown in Step 2 |
31,841,263 |
|
Subtract “C” Note: number must be same as shown in Step 3 |
500,000 |
|
Total [“A” x 0.15] – “C” |
31,341,263 [Note: this is the remaining placement capacity under rule 7.1] |
|
Part 2
Rule 7.1A – Additional placement capacity for eligible entities |
|
Step 1: Calculate “A”, the base figure from which the placement capacity is calculated |
|
“A” Note: number must be same as shown in Step 1 of Part 1 |
Not applicable |
Step 2: Calculate 10% of “A” |
|
“D” |
0.10 Note: this value cannot be changed |
Multiply “A” by 0.10 |
Not applicable |
Step 3: Calculate “E”, the amount of placement capacity under rule 7.1A that has already been used |
|
Insert number of +equity securities issued or agreed to be issued in that 12 month period under rule 7.1A Notes: • This applies to equity securities – not just ordinary securities • Include here – if applicable – the securities the subject of the Appendix 3B to which this form is annexed • Do not include equity securities issued under rule 7.1 (they must be dealt with in Part 1), or for which specific security holder approval has been obtained • It may be useful to set out issues of securities on different dates as separate line items |
Not applicable |
“E” |
Not applicable |
Step 4: Subtract “E” from [“A” x “D”] to calculate remaining placement capacity under rule 7.1A |
|
“A” x 0.10 Note: number must be same as shown in Step 2 |
Not applicable |
Subtract “E” Note: number must be same as shown in Step 3 |
Not applicable |
Total [“A” x 0.10] – “E” |
Not applicable Note: this is the remaining placement capacity under rule 7.1A |
Notice under Section 708A
30 May 2018
Prairie Mining Limited (“Company”) has today issued 44,776,120 fully paid ordinary shares. The issued securities are in a class of securities quoted on the Australian Securities Exchange (“ASX”).
The Company gives this notice pursuant to Section 708A(5)(e) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cwth)(the “Act”) that:
1. the Company issued the securities without disclosure to investors under Part 6D.2 of the Act;
2. as at the date of this notice, the Company has complied with the provisions of Chapter 2M of the Act as they apply to the Company, and section 674 of the Act; and
3. as at the date of this notice, there is no information that is “excluded information” within the meaning of sections 708A(7) and 708A(8) of the Act.
Prairie Mining #PDZ – Debiensko concession amendment and application update
In December 2016, following the acquisition of the Debiensko Hard Coking Coal Mine, Prairie Mining Limited applied to the Ministry of Environment (“MoE”) to amend the 50 year Debiensko mining concession.
The purpose of the concession amendment was to extend the time stipulated in the mining concession for first production of coal from 2018 to 2025. Prairie has now received an initial (non-binding) and appealable, first instance decision from the MoE that has denied the Company’s amendment application.
Prairie continues to have valid tenure and ownership of land at Debiensko. Not meeting the production timeframe stipulated in the concession does not infringe on the validity and expiry date of the Debiensko mining concession, which is June 2058. Prairie also holds a valid environmental consent decision enabling mine construction.
Prairie will appeal the MoE’s decision on the basis that its justification for denial is fundamentally flawed for a number of reasons including failure to take into account the requirements of the law and public interest in Poland, and the relevant facts of the Company and its amendment application.
Prairie will strongly defend its position and continue to take relevant actions to pursue its legal rights regarding the Debiensko concession.
Discussions have continued with Jastrzębska Spółka Węglowa SA (“JSW”) regarding potential transaction(s) options in respect of Prairie’s tier 1 coking coal projects in Poland.
Debiensko Concession Amendment
Under the terms of the Debiensko mining concession issued in 2008 by the MoE (which is valid for 50 years from grant date), commencement of production was to occur by 1 January 2018. In December 2016, the Company submitted an application to the MoE to amend the Debiensko mining concession to alter the date for commencement of production from 2018 to 2025, and also provided the MoE with additional information requested. Not commencing production by January 2018 does not infringe on the validity and expiry date of the current mining concession, which is June 2058. However, the concession authority has the right to request the concession holder to remove any infringements related to non-conformance with the conditions of a mining concession and determine a reasonable date for removal of the infringements. In accordance with Polish law, the concession authority is required to provide an achievable and reasonable timeframe to remedy any non-compliance taking into account the nature of the non-conformance.
Prairie has now received notification from the MoE in an initial, first instance decision, that the concession amendment request has been denied. Prairie believes that the justification for this denial is flawed and does not take into account the requirements of law and the public interest in Poland, or the facts of the Company and its amendment application, which demonstrates yet further evidence of discriminatory treatment faced by Prairie as a foreign investor in Poland.
The MoE took over 17 months to provide the Company with a decision, whereas under Polish administrative law there is a maximum statutory deadline of two months for the MoE to provide such decision.
Prairie has a right to appeal the first instance decision of the MoE. Prairie’s legal team is in the process of preparing this appeal, which will point out the deficiencies of the MoE’s first instance decision. If Prairie’s appeal is unsuccessful, then this may lead to the commencement of proceedings by the MoE to limit or withdraw the Debiensko concession. Prairie also has the right of further appeal to Poland’s administrative courts.
The Company will consider any other actions necessary to ensure its concession rights are preserved, which may result in the Company taking further action against the MoE including invoking the protection afforded to the Company under any relevant bi-lateral or multi-lateral investment treaties or such other actions as the Company may consider appropriate at the relevant time.
Prairie will continue to update the market in relation to this matter as required.
Prairie has always conducted its business in Poland in accordance with the Polish law and continues to pioneer the application of international standards for development and feasibility work in Poland necessary to ensure the value of its Tier One coking coal projects are maximised for all stakeholders, meet the rigorous requirements for international financing and can ensure the production of high quality coking coal product to regional European steel makers.
Poland is multi-party representative democracy and has been a member of the European Union since 2004. Prairie Mining has been listed on the Warsaw Stock Exchange since September 2015 and enjoys a strong and increasing Polish shareholder base. Prairie benefits from strong support of local communities and regional governments, and our activities are in line with Polish national government policy that considers coal at the core of Poland’s raw material security, seeks to renew Polish industry and enhance economic development in Eastern Poland, where the Jan Karski Mine is located.
Australia also holds the status of “Most Favoured Nation” with Poland and the countries signed a Promotion and Protection of Investment Agreement in 1991 (a Bilateral Investment Treaty) which provides reciprocal protections for investments made by residents and entities of both countries, including licences for exploration and mining of natural resources. Prairie reserves the right to make future claims against the Polish state under the Promotion and Protection of Investment Agreement.
For further information, please contact:
Prairie Mining Limited |
Tel: +44 207 478 3900 |
Ben Stoikovich, Chief Executive Officer |
Email: info@pdz.com.au |
Sapan Ghai, Head of Corporate Development |
ABOUT THE DEBIENSKO MINE
The Debiensko mine is a hard coking coal project located in the Upper Silesian Coal Basin in the south west of the Republic of Poland. It is approximately 40 km from the city of Katowice and 40 km from the Czech Republic.
Debiensko is bordered by the Knurow-Szczyglowice Mine in the north west and the Budryk Mine in the north east, both owned and operated by JSW, Europe’s leading producer of hard coking coal.
The Debiensko mine was originally opened in 1898 and was operated by various Polish mining companies until 2000 when mining operations were terminated due to a major government led restructuring of the coal sector caused by a downturn in global coal prices. In early 2006 New World Resources Plc (“NWR”) acquired Debiensko and commenced planning for Debiensko to comply with Polish mining standards, with the aim of accessing and mining hard coking coal seams.
In October 2016, Prairie acquired Debiensko with a view that a revised development approach would potentially allow for the early mining of profitable premium hard coking coal seams, whilst minimising upfront capital costs. Prairie has proven expertise in defining commercially robust projects and applying international standards in Poland. The fact that Debiensko is a former operating mine and its proximity to two neighbouring coking coal producers in the same geological setting, reaffirms the significant potential to successfully bring Debiensko back into operation.
Prairie Mining #PDZ – March 2018 quarterly report highlights
Highlights from and subsequent to the quarter end:
Possible Co-Operation between Prairie and JSW
- During the quarter, Prairie noted press articles regarding possible co-operation between the Company and Jastrzębska Spółka Węglowa SA to progress the development and exploitation of the Company’s Polish coking coal assets. Prairie confirmed that meetings were held with JSW where preliminary discussions regarding co-operation took place.
- Prairie and JSW have since entered into a Non-Disclosure Agreement to allow for the exchange of technical and commercial information in order to facilitate substantial and more advanced discussions regarding any potential co-operation or transaction(s) options in respect of Prairie’s projects.
- Prairie has made available information in relation to both the Debiensko Mine and Jan Karski Project to allow JSW to conduct assessments of their feasibility and economics.
- The NDA provides for discussions to be conducted for an initial period up to 6 months, which may be extended by mutual agreement of both parties.
Jan Karski Mine
- As announced on 21 February 2018, Prairie continued to use modern exploration techniques to transform Jan Karski with latest drill results re-affirming the capability of the project to produce high value ultra-low ash semi-soft coking coal, known as Type 34 coal in Poland. Coking coal quality results announced during the quarter are superior to the drill results announced in May 2017, and further confirm that Jan Karski is a globally significant semi-soft coking coal / Type 34 coking coal deposit with the potential to produce a high value ultra-low ash SSCC with an exceptional CSR and a high 75% coking coal product split.
- However, on 3 April 2018, Prairie announced that it had commenced legal proceedings against Poland’s Ministry of Environment due to its failure to grant Prairie a Mining Usufruct Agreement over the concessions which form the Jan Karski Mine and in order to protect the Company’s security of tenure over the project.
- Pursuant to the initiated legal proceedings, the Company is pleased to announce that:
- the Polish Civil Court has ruled in Prairie’s favour by granting an injunction preventing the MoE from granting any prospecting, exploration or mining concession and concluding usufruct agreements with any other party until full court proceedings are concluded;
- this decision provides security of tenure over the Jan Karski concessions and effectively safeguards Prairie’s rights at the project until full court proceedings have concluded; and
- the Lublin Regional Director for the Environment has issued an official notification indicating that the process to establish an Environmental Consent decision for Jan Karski will be concluded by 30 June 2018, being the final approval required for Prairie to submit a Mining Concession application.
Corporate
- Prairie remains in a financially strong position with cash reserves of A$13 million.
- With CD Capital’s right to invest a further A$68 million as a cornerstone investor, plus with the Strategic Co-operation Agreement between Prairie and China Coal for financing and construction of Jan Karski, Prairie is financially well positioned to progress with its planned development activities at Debiensko and Jan Karski.
Ben Stoikovich, Chief Executive Officer commented: “The latest drilling result continues to demonstrate that Jan Karski is a globally significant semi-soft / Type 34 coking coal project. This presents an outstanding economic development opportunity for the Lublin region, and Chelm province in particular, to become a leading European supplier of coking coal to the steel industry. At Jan Karski we are continuing with the Environmental Consent process, which is the final decision we require in order to apply for a Mining Concession. The injunction recently awarded in Prairie’s favor by the civil court in Warsaw against Poland’s Ministry of Environment effectively safeguards Prairie’s security of tenure at Jan Karski until full court proceedings have taken place. Our discussions with JSW are ongoing and we will continue to update the market in line with the relevant reporting requirements”.
For further information, please contact:
Prairie Mining Limited |
+44 20 7478 3900 |
Ben Stoikovich, Chief Executive Officer |
|
Sapan Ghai, Head of Corporate Development |
JAN KARSKI MINE
The Jan Karski Mine is a large scale semi-soft coking coal project located in the Lublin Coal Basin in south east Poland. The Lublin Coal Basin is an established coal producing province which is well serviced by modern and highly efficient infrastructure, offering the potential for low capital intensity mine development. Jan Karski is situated adjacent to the Bogdanka coal mine which has been in commercial production since 1982 and is the lowest cost hard coal producer in Europe.
Prairie Mining Limited’s use of modern exploration techniques continues to transform Jan Karski with latest drill results re-affriming the capability of the the project to produce high value ultra-low ash semi-soft coking coal, known as Type 34 coal in Poland.
The coking coal quality results are superior to the drill results announced in May 2017, and further confirm that Jan Karski is a globally significant semi-soft coking coal (“SSCC”) / Type 34 coking coal deposit with the potential to produce a high value ultra-low ash SSCC with a coking coal product split of up to 75%.
Key benefits for the local community and the Lublin and Chelm regions associated with the development, construction and operation of Jan Karski have been recognised as the following:
· creation of 2,000 direct employment positions and 10,000 indirect jobs for the region once operational;
· increasing skills of the workforce and through the implementation of International Standard training programmes;
· stimulating the development of education, health services and communications within the region; and
· building a mine that creates new employment for generations to come and career paths for families to remain in the region.
Polish Civil Court Grants Injunction in Prairie’s Favour against Poland’s Ministry of Environment
On 3 April 2018, Prairie announced that it had commenced legal proceedings against Poland’s Ministry of Environment (“MoE”) due to its failure to grant Prairie a Mining Usufruct Agreement over the concessions which form the Jan Karski Mine and in order to protect the Company’s security of tenure over the project.
Pursuant to the initiated legal proceedings, the Company is pleased to announce that:
· the Polish Civil Court has ruled in Prairie’s favour by granting an injunction preventing the MoE from granting prospecting, exploration or mining concessions and concluding usufruct agreements with any other party until full court proceedings are concluded;
· this decision provides security of tenure over the Jan Karski concessions and effectively safeguards Prairie’s rights at the Project until full court proceedings have concluded; and
· the Lublin Regional Director for the Environment has issued an official notification indicating that the process to establish an Environmental Consent decision for Jan Karski will be concluded by 30 June 2018, being the final approval required for Prairie to submit a Mining Concession application.
The Regional Civil Court in Warsaw has issued a verdict that forms an injunction preventing the MoE from concluding exploration or mining usufruct agreement(s) regarding the Jan Karski Mine area (including the “Lublin” deposit, as well as the former K-4-5, K-6-7, K-8 and K-9 concession areas) with any party, other than PD Co Sp. z. o.o. (Prairie Mining’s wholly owned Polish subsidiary). The Court has also ordered that the MoE does not grant any concessions (for prospecting, exploration and/or mining) to any party other than PD Co Sp. z. o.o. This highly favourable court ruling was issued in response to Prairie’s application submitted as part of the legal proceedings commenced by Prairie to protect its tenure at Jan Karski.
As a result of the ruling by the Regional Civil Court in Warsaw, security of tenure over the Jan Karski concessions will be safeguarded until full court proceedings have concluded. It is anticipated that full court proceedings could take 12 months or more to complete.
In the justification to the Court’s ruling, the judge stated that: “Based on the evidence one may at this point state that the plaintiff [Prairie Mining] enjoys the right to request conclusion of the requested mining usufruct agreement for the “Lublin” hard coal area (otherwise known as Jan Karski) resulting from Article 15 of the Geological and Mining Law.”
As discussed above, in April 2018, Prairie commenced legal action against the MoE for breaching the Polish Geological and Mining Law (2011) (“GML”) in relation to the award of a Mining Usufruct Agreement to Prairie at Jan Karski.
Prairie has provided the MoE with all documents required by Polish Law to conclude a Mining Usufruct Agreement, including the Geological Documentation approval and an official application for a Mining Usufruct Agreement.
To date the MoE has still not provided Prairie with a Mining Usufruct Agreement for Jan Karski.
Based on professional advice, Prairie considers that the MoE breached the GML and Polish law and is defending its position having commenced legal proceedings against the MoE through the Polish courts to protect its tenure at Jan Karski.
The Company will also consider any other actions necessary to ensure its concession rights are reserved which may result in the Company taking further action against the MoE including invoking the protection afforded to the Company under any relevant bi-lateral or multi-lateral investment treaties or such other actions as the Company may consider appropriate at the relevant time.
Prairie will continue to update the market in relation to this matter as required.
Regional Director for the Environment sets a new deadline for issuing an Environmental Consent Decision
Prairie completed an Environmental and Social Impact Assessment and made submissions to the Lublin Regional Director for the Environment (“RDOS”) for an Environmental Consent decision for Jan Karski in October 2017. RDOS has issued a notice indicating that the Environmental Proceedings in order to issue a decision for Environmental Consent will be concluded by 30 June 2018. RDOS also confirmed receipt of all necessary opinions from other government agencies, including the Regional Water Management Board in Lublin.
Subsequent to the commencement of legal proceedings, Prairie’s team has received a request for additional information from RDOS and, together with the appointed environmental consultants, are working to provide this information, which is expected to be completed within the coming weeks.
Latest Drill Results Affirm Jan Karski as a Semi-Soft Coking Coal Project
During the quarter, Prairie announced the results of enhanced coal quality analysis and test work from a recently completed borehole (Kulik 1) at Jan Karski. The coking coal quality results are superior to the drill results announced in May 2017, and further confirm that Jan Karski is a globally significant semi-soft coking coal (“SSCC”) / Type 34 coking coal deposit with the potential to produce a high value ultra-low ash SSCC with an exceptional CSR and a high 75% coking coal product split.
The Kulik 1 borehole was a large diameter borehole enabling sufficient quantities of coal from the 391 seam to be collected to meet the requirements for physical coke testing, specifically confirmation of Coke Strength after Reaction (“CSR”) and extended coal washability test work. Coke testing was conducted at Centralne Laboratorium Pomiarowo-Badawcze Sp. z o.o. (“CLPB”) laboratories in Poland which is controlled by JSW and is internationally accredited as a commercial coal and coke testing laboratory. Washability and other basic coal quality analyses were conducted in the UK.
CSR analysis is considered vital in testing for a coal’s coking properties and is important to steelmakers as it is an indicator of the performance / strength of the coke produced from the coal. The full range of standard coking tests were also conducted as shown in Table 1 below.
Table 1: Analysis results from Jan Karski Kulik 1 borehole – 391 seam |
||
COKING PROPERTIES |
||
FSI |
7.0 |
|
Roga Index |
82 |
|
CSR |
% |
54.0 |
CRI |
% |
36.5 |
Ash in Coke |
% |
5.8 |
Sulphur in Coke |
% |
0.78 |
Giesler Plastometer |
||
Initial Softening |
°C |
404 |
Max Fluidity temp |
°C |
440 |
Resolidification |
°C |
463 |
Max Fluidity |
ddpm |
268 |
ASTM Dilation |
||
Softening Temperature |
°C |
380 |
Max Contraction Temp |
°C |
420 |
Max Dilation Temp |
°C |
450 |
Max Dilation |
% D |
64 |
PROXIMATE ANALYSIS |
||
Inherent moisture |
adb% |
1.73 |
Ash |
adb% |
3.45 |
Volatile Matter |
adb% |
35.5 |
OTHER COAL PROPERTIES |
||
Sulphur |
ar% |
1.00 |
Rank (Ro) |
0.85 |
|
Vitrinite |
% |
84 |
Washability analysis from the Kulik 1 borehole and previous boreholes drilled by Prairie across Jan Karski has demonstrated that due to the low inherent ash and excellent washability characteristics of the 391 seam, Jan Karski SSCC is unique with ash product levels of 3.45% or less (air dried) and far superior to typical ash levels for major coking coal brands (both hard and soft) traded internationally and produced domestically in Europe. Further, the exceptionally high CSR (54) of the 391 seam from Kulik 1 borehole at Jan Karski is at the very top end of the range for globally traded SSCC.
The ultra-low ash content increases the coal’s value-in-use to steel and coke makers, making the product highly saleable in both the domestic European and international markets. One of the key outcomes of utilising ultra-low ash coking coal to produce low ash coke ash is the resulting decreased fuel rate. This has a key environmental benefit for steel makers as it reduces CO2 emissions per tonne of hot metal produced.
Prairie’s analysis predicts increasing global demand for ultra-low ash coking coal for blending with hard coking coal (“HCC”), due to a continuing trend of rising average ash levels in globally traded hard coking coals. Premium HCC resources with low ash are becoming increasingly scarce, forcing consumers to make concessions on HCC ash levels. Ultra-low ash coking coals for blending are becoming increasingly sought after by consumers seeking to “blend-down” the ash levels in their coke blends. This is an advantage for European steelmakers where EU regulations focus on reduced CO2 emissions and compliance with other EU emissions directives. The trend of ever more stringent emissions standards for steelmakers imposed by the EU indicates a positive future for marketability of Jan Karski ultralow ash semi-soft / Type 34 coking coal.
Increased European Demand for Semi-Soft / Type 34 Coal
Polish demand for hard coal remained strong during 2017, with Poland being forced to import 13.3 million tonnes of hard coal to meet its own needs – an increase of 60% in hard coal imports year on year. This follows a steady trend in Poland over the last few years with domestic production of hard coal declining and increased reliance on imports.
Concurrently, declining production of Czech and Polish semi-soft / Type 34 coking coal has resulted in steel makers becoming more aware of the importance of security of supply of the raw material. Over the last 12 months, lack of delivery of semi-soft / Type 34 coking coal has forced some Central European steel makers to introduce urgent measures including changes in the coking charge mix and increased imports, thus generating additional costs and disturbing normal production.
Comparison of Jan Karski’s latest coking coal quality results to other mines in Poland and the Czech Republic that have historically produced SSCC or Type 34 coking coal show the great potential that Jan Karski has to meet European market demand for Type 34 semi-soft coking coal as production from other Czech and Polish mines continues to diminish over the coming years.
DEBIENSKO MINE
The Debiensko Mine (“Debiensko”) is a fully permitted, hard coking coal project located in the Upper Silesian Coal Basin in the south west of the Republic of Poland. It is approximately 40 km from the city of Katowice and 40 km from the Czech Republic.
Debiensko is bordered by the Knurow-Szczyglowice Mine in the north west and the Budryk Mine in the north east, both owned and operated by Jastrzębska Spółka Węglowa SA (“JSW”), Europe’s leading producer of hard coking coal.
The Debiensko mine was originally opened in 1898 and was operated by various Polish mining companies until 2000 when mining operations were terminated due to a major government led restructuring of the coal sector caused by a downturn in global coal prices. In early 2006 New World Resources Plc (“NWR”) acquired Debiensko and commenced planning for Debiensko to comply with Polish mining standards, with the aim of accessing and mining hard coking coal seams. In 2008, the Minister of Environment of Poland (“MoE”) granted a 50-year mine license for Debiensko.
In October 2016, Prairie acquired Debiensko with a view that a revised development approach would potentially allow for the early mining of profitable premium hard coking coal seams, whilst minimising upfront capital costs. Prairie has proven expertise in defining commercially robust projects and applying international standards in Poland. The fact that Debiensko is a former operating mine and its proximity to two neighbouring coking coal producers in the same geological setting, reaffirms the significant potential to successfully bring Debiensko back into operation.
Preparation for the Next Phase of Project Studies
Prairie continued to analyse the drill hole data which will be used for engineering design of foundations of structures associated with the shafts, coal handling and preparation plant (“CHPP”) and other surface facilities. These holes are essential in order to assess the soil conditions, properly design structural foundations and thus provide more accurate pricing in the tenders as required for a feasibility study.
Pre-qualification of contractors for the major components of the next phase of Debiensko studies also continued throughout the quarter.
Prairie’s team have also designed an infill drilling program that when undertaken will upgrade more of the resource base at Debienkso to the Measured and Indicated resource categories and support JORC compliant reserve estimation.
CORPORATE
Possible Co-Operation between Prairie and JSW
Prairie and JSW have entered into a Non-Disclosure Agreement (“NDA”) with respect to potential co-operation regarding Prairie’s two Polish coal projects. The purpose of the NDA is to allow for the exchange of technical and commercial information in order to facilitate substantial and more advanced discussions regarding any potential transaction(s) options in respect of Prairie’s projects.
Prairie will make available information in relation to the hard coking coal project under the Debiensko concession, to allow JSW to conduct an assessment of its feasibility and economics, taking into consideration factors including, but not limited to: its stage of development, conditions of the mining concession, environmental permits, and the mining usufruct contract. JSW will also assess other various risks and opportunities, including JSW’s existing infrastructure at the neighbouring Knurów-Szczygłowice mine.
Prairie will also make available to JSW information in relation to the Jan Karski project in the Lublin Coal Basin, to allow JSW to conduct an assessment of the project’s feasibility and economics regarding coking coal, taking into consideration factors including, but not limited to: its phase of development, the physical and chemical parameters of the coal (in particular its coking parameters), the timeframe and conditions with regards to obligations to obtain a mining concession, as well as other various risks and opportunities.
It is emphasised that discussions are at a preliminary stage and that even if they move onto discussions of specific transactions terms, any potential transaction(s), should they occur, may be subject to a number of conditions including, but not limited to, obtaining positive evaluations and expert opinions, necessary corporate approvals, consents and approvals related to funding, consents from Poland’s Office of Competition and Consumer Protection (UOKiK) if required, and any other requirements that may relate to the strategy, objectives and regulatory regimes applicable to either Prairie Mining or JSW.
There can be no certainty as to whether any transaction(s) will be agreed, or the potential form of such transaction(s).
The NDA provides for discussions to be conducted for an initial period up to 6 months, which may be extended by mutual agreement of both parties. The companies will continue to comply with their respective disclosure obligations to the relevant markets, as required.
Financial Position
Prairie has cash reserves of A$13 million. With CD Capital’s right to invest a further A$68 million as a cornerstone investor, plus with the Strategic Co-operation Agreement Prairie has with China Coal for financing and construction of Jan Karski, Prairie is in a strong financial position to progress with its planned development activities at Debiensko and Jan Karski.
Forward Looking Statements
This release may include forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based on Prairie’s expectations and beliefs concerning future events. Forward looking statements are necessarily subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are outside the control of Prairie, which could cause actual results to differ materially from such statements. Prairie makes no undertaking to subsequently update or revise the forward-looking statements made in this release, to reflect the circumstances or events after the date of that release.
Competent Person Statements
The information in this announcement that relates to Exploration Results was extracted from Prairie’s announcement dated 21 February 2018 entitled “Drill Results Affirm Jan Karski’s Status as a Globally Significant Semi-Soft (Type 34) Coking Coal Project”. The information in the original announcement is based on, and fairly represents information compiled or reviewed by Mr Jonathan O’Dell, a Competent Person who is a Member of The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. Mr O’Dell is a part time consultant of the Company. Mr O’Dell has sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Prairie confirms that: a) it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in the original announcements; b) all material assumptions and technical parameters included in the original announcements continue to apply and have not materially changed; and c) the form and context in which the relevant Competent Persons’ findings are presented in this presentation have not been materially modified from the original announcements.
APPENDIX 1 – EXPLORATION TENEMENT INFORMATION
As at 31 March 2018, the Company has an interest in the following tenements:
Location |
Tenement |
Percentage Interest |
Status |
Tenement Type |
Jan Karski, Poland |
Jan Karski Mine Plan Area (K-4-5, K-6-7, K-8 and K-9)* |
100 |
Granted |
Exclusive Right to apply for a mining concession |
Jan Karski, Poland |
Kulik (K-4-5) |
100 |
Granted |
Exploration |
Jan Karski, Poland |
Syczyn (K-8) |
100 |
Granted |
Exploration |
Jan Karski, Poland |
Kopina (K-9) |
100 |
Granted |
Exploration |
Debiensko, Poland |
Debiensko 1** |
100 |
Granted |
Mining |
Debiensko, Poland |
Kaczyce 1 |
100 |
Granted |
Mining & Exploration (includes gas rights) |
* In July 2015, Prairie announced that it had secured the Exclusive Right to apply for a Mining Concession for Jan Karski as a result of its Geological Documentation for the Jan Karski deposit being approved by Poland’s MoE. The approved Geological Documentation covers areas of all four original Exploration Concessions granted to Prairie (K-4-5, K-6-7, K-8 and K-9) and includes the full extent of the targeted resources within the mine plan for Jan Karski. As a result of the Exclusive Right, Prairie was the only entity with a legal right to lodge a Mining Concession application over Jan Karski for the period up and until 2 April 2018. Under the Polish GML, a Mining Concession application comprises the submission of a Deposit Development Plan (“DDP”), approval of a spatial development plan (rezoning of land for mining use) and an Environmental Consent decision. Prairie has previously announced that the DDP and spatial development plans for Jan Karski have already been approved.
However, as of the date of this quarterly, Prairie has not yet received the required Environmental Consent decision, which remains pending. Prairie completed an Environmental and Social Impact Assessment and made submissions to RDOS for an Environmental Consent decision in October 2017. Prairie has not been able to apply for a Mining Concession for Jan Karski due to the delay in the issuance of an Environmental Consent decision. However, the Environmental Consent proceedings continue to progress and a decision for Environmental Consent will be concluded by 30 June 2018.
The approval of Prairie’s Geological Documentation in 2015 also conferred upon Prairie the legal right to apply for a Mining Usufruct Agreement over Jan Karski for an additional 12-month period beyond April 2018, which precludes any other parties being granted any licence over all or part of the Jan Karski concessions. Under Polish law, the MoE is strictly obligated, within three months of Prairie making an application for a Mining Usufruct Agreement, to grant the agreement. It should be noted that the MoE confirmed Prairie’s priority right in two written statements (i.e. in a final administrative decision dated 11 February 2016 and in a formal letter dated 13 April 2016). Prairie applied to the MoE for a Mining Usufruct Agreement over Jan Karski in late December 2017. As of the date of this quarterly the MoE has not made available to Prairie a Mining Usufruct Agreement for Jan Karski, therefore breaching the three-month obligatory period for the agreement to be concluded. Legal advice provided to Prairie concludes that failure of the MoE to grant Prairie the Mining Usufruct Agreement is a breach of Polish law. Accordingly, the Company commenced legal proceedings against the MoE through the Polish courts in order to protect the Company’s security of tenure over the Jan Karski concessions. Since the MoE has not provided a decision within three months regarding Prairie’s Mining Usufruct application, the Polish civil court has the power to enforce conclusion of a Usufruct Agreement in place of the MoE. In the event that a Mining Usufruct Agreement is not made available to the Company on acceptable terms or the Company does not enter into a Mining Usufruct Agreement for any other reason, other parties may be able to apply for exploration or mining rights for all or part of the Jan Karski concession area. However, given that the Civil Court has approved Prairie’s motion for an injunction against the MoE, as described above, the MoE is now prevented from entering into a Usufruct agreement or concession with any other party besides Prairie until the full court proceedings are concluded.
** Under the terms of the Debiensko Mining Concession issued in 2008 by the MoE (which is valid for 50 years from grant date), commencement of production was to occur by 1 January 2018. Not commencing production by January 2018 does not immediately infringe on the validity and expiry date of the current Mining Concession, which is June 2058. However, the concession authority has the right to request the concession holder to reasonably remove any infringements related to non-conformance with the conditions of a Mining Concession and determine a reasonable date for removal of the infringements (under Polish law, the concession authority is required to provide a reasonable timeframe to remedy any non-compliance taking into account the nature of the non-conformance). Failure to remedy the infringements within any reasonable time frame prescribed by the concession authority may lead to commencement of proceedings to limit or withdraw of a concession. In December 2016, the Company submitted an application to the MoE to amend the Debiensko Mining Concession to alter the date for commencement of production from 2018 to 2025, and has provided the MoE with additional information requested. A decision from the MoE is currently pending following a change in the Polish Prime Minister in December 2017 and the appointment of a new Minister of Environment in January 2018.
+Rule 5.5
Appendix 5B
Mining exploration entity and oil and gas exploration entity quarterly report
Introduced 01/07/96 Origin Appendix 8 Amended 01/07/97, 01/07/98, 30/09/01, 01/06/10, 17/12/10, 01/05/13, 01/09/16
Name of entity |
||
PRAIRIE MINING LIMITED |
||
ABN |
Quarter ended (“current quarter”) |
|
23 008 677 852 |
31 March 2018 |
Consolidated statement of cash flows |
Current quarter $A’000 |
Year to date (9 months) |
||
1. |
Cash flows from operating activities |
– |
– |
|
1.1 |
Receipts from customers |
|||
1.2 |
Payments for |
(1,921) |
(4,875) |
|
(a) exploration & evaluation |
||||
(b) development |
– |
– |
||
(c) production |
– |
– |
||
(d) staff costs |
(489) |
(1,572) |
||
(e) administration and corporate costs |
(276) |
(716) |
||
1.3 |
Dividends received (see note 3) |
– |
– |
|
1.4 |
Interest received |
94 |
297 |
|
1.5 |
Interest and other costs of finance paid |
– |
– |
|
1.6 |
Income taxes paid |
– |
– |
|
1.7 |
Research and development refunds |
– |
– |
|
1.8 |
Other (provide details if material) (a) Business development costs (b) Property rental and gas sales |
(147) 151 |
(672) 399 |
|
1.9 |
Net cash from / (used in) operating activities |
(2,588) |
(7,140) |
|
2. |
Cash flows from investing activities |
(22) |
(84) |
|
2.1 |
Payments to acquire: |
|||
(a) property, plant and equipment |
||||
(b) tenements (see item 10) |
– |
– |
||
(c) investments |
– |
– |
||
(d) other non-current assets |
– |
– |
||
2.2 |
Proceeds from the disposal of: |
– |
497 |
|
(a) property, plant and equipment |
||||
(b) tenements (see item 10) |
– |
– |
||
(c) investments |
– |
– |
||
(d) other non-current assets |
– |
– |
||
2.3 |
Cash flows from loans to other entities |
– |
– |
|
2.4 |
Dividends received (see note 3) |
– |
– |
|
2.5 |
Other (provide details if material) |
– |
– |
|
2.6 |
Net cash from / (used in) investing activities |
(22) |
413 |
|
3. |
Cash flows from financing activities |
– |
– |
|
3.1 |
Proceeds from issues of shares |
|||
3.2 |
Proceeds from issue of convertible notes |
– |
2,627 |
|
3.3 |
Proceeds from exercise of share options |
– |
– |
|
3.4 |
Transaction costs related to issues of shares, convertible notes or options |
(3) |
(182) |
|
3.5 |
Proceeds from borrowings |
– |
– |
|
3.6 |
Repayment of borrowings |
– |
– |
|
3.7 |
Transaction costs related to loans and borrowings |
– |
– |
|
3.8 |
Dividends paid |
– |
– |
|
3.9 |
Other (provide details if material) |
– |
– |
|
3.10 |
Net cash from / (used in) financing activities |
(3) |
2,445 |
|
4. |
Net increase / (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents for the period |
15,140 |
16,809 |
|
4.1 |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|||
4.2 |
Net cash from / (used in) operating activities (item 1.9 above) |
(2,588) |
(7,140) |
|
4.3 |
Net cash from / (used in) investing activities (item 2.6 above) |
(22) |
413 |
|
4.4 |
Net cash from / (used in) financing activities (item 3.10 above) |
(3) |
2,445 |
|
4.5 |
Effect of movement in exchange rates on cash held |
2 |
2 |
|
4.6 |
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
12,529 |
12,529 |
|
5. |
Reconciliation of cash and cash equivalents |
Current quarter |
Previous quarter |
5.1 |
Bank balances |
2,029 |
3,640 |
5.2 |
Call deposits |
10,500 |
11,500 |
5.3 |
Bank overdrafts |
– |
– |
5.4 |
Other (provide details) |
– |
– |
5.5 |
Cash and cash equivalents at end of quarter (should equal item 4.6 above) |
12,529 |
15,140 |
6. |
Payments to directors of the entity and their associates |
Current quarter |
6.1 |
Aggregate amount of payments to these parties included in item 1.2 |
(158) |
6.2 |
Aggregate amount of cash flow from loans to these parties included in item 2.3 |
Nil |
6.3 |
Include below any explanation necessary to understand the transactions included in items 6.1 and 6.2 |
|
Payments include executive remuneration (including bonuses), director fees, superannuation and provision of a fully serviced office. |
7. |
Payments to related entities of the entity and their associates |
Current quarter |
7.1 |
Aggregate amount of payments to these parties included in item 1.2 |
– |
7.2 |
Aggregate amount of cash flow from loans to these parties included in item 2.3 |
– |
7.3 |
Include below any explanation necessary to understand the transactions included in items 7.1 and 7.2 |
|
Not applicable
|
8. |
Financing facilities available |
Total facility amount at quarter end |
Amount drawn at quarter end |
8.1 |
Loan facilities |
– |
– |
8.2 |
Credit standby arrangements |
– |
– |
8.3 |
Other (please specify) |
– |
– |
8.4 |
Include below a description of each facility above, including the lender, interest rate and whether it is secured or unsecured. If any additional facilities have been entered into or are proposed to be entered into after quarter end, include details of those facilities as well. |
||
9. |
Estimated cash outflows for next quarter |
$A’000 |
9.1 |
Exploration and evaluation |
(1,000) |
9.2 |
Development |
– |
9.3 |
Production |
– |
9.4 |
Staff costs |
(500) |
9.5 |
Administration and corporate costs |
(200) |
9.6 |
Other (provide details if material) |
(200) |
9.7 |
Total estimated cash outflows |
(1,900) |
10. |
Changes in tenements |
Tenement reference and location |
Nature of interest |
Interest at beginning of quarter |
Interest at end of quarter |
10.1 |
Interests in mining tenements and petroleum tenements lapsed, relinquished or reduced |
Sawin, Poland |
Direct |
100 |
– |
10.2 |
Interests in mining tenements and petroleum tenements acquired or increased |
– |
– |
– |
– |
Compliance statement
1 This statement has been prepared in accordance with accounting standards and policies which comply with Listing Rule 19.11A.
2 This statement gives a true and fair view of the matters disclosed.
[lodged electronically without signature]
Sign here: …………………………………………………… Date: 30 April 2018
(Director/Company secretary)
Print name: Dylan Browne
Notes
1. The quarterly report provides a basis for informing the market how the entity’s activities have been financed for the past quarter and the effect on its cash position. An entity that wishes to disclose additional information is encouraged to do so, in a note or notes included in or attached to this report.
2. If this quarterly report has been prepared in accordance with Australian Accounting Standards, the definitions in, and provisions of, AASB 6: Exploration for and Evaluation of Mineral Resources and AASB 107: Statement of Cash Flows apply to this report. If this quarterly report has been prepared in accordance with other accounting standards agreed by ASX pursuant to Listing Rule 19.11A, the corresponding equivalent standards apply to this report.
3. Dividends received may be classified either as cash flows from operating activities or cash flows from investing activities, depending on the accounting policy of the entity.
However, on 3 April 2018, Prairie announced that it had commenced legal proceedings against Poland’s Ministry of Environment due to its failure to grant Prairie a Mining Usufruct Agreement over the concessions which form the Jan Karski Mine and in order to protect the Company’s security of tenure over the project.
Brand Communications CEO Alan Green discusses #FDBK #PDZ #PHE and DragApp on Vox Markets podcast
Alan Green CEO of Brand Communications talks about: Feedback #FDBK Prairie Mining #PDZ Powerhouse Energy #PHE & Draggapp.com on the Vox Markets Podcast. The interview starts at 10 minute 8 seconds in.
Prairie Mining #PDZ – Jan Karski update – Favourable Court Decision
On 3 April 2018, Prairie Mining Limited announced that it had commenced legal proceedings against Poland’s Ministry of Environment due to its failure to grant Prairie a Mining Usufruct Agreement over the concessions which form the Jan Karski Mine and in order to protect the Company’s security of tenure over the Project.
Pursuant to the initiated legal proceedings, the Company is pleased to announce that:
- the Polish Civil Court has ruled in Prairie’s favour by granting an injunction preventing the MoE from granting prospecting, exploration or mining concessions and concluding usufruct agreements with any other party until full court proceedings are concluded;
- this decision provides security of tenure over the Jan Karski concessions and effectively safeguards Prairie’s rights at the Project until full court proceedings have concluded; and
- the Lublin Regional Director for the Environment has issued an official notification indicating that the process to establish an Environmental Consent decision for Jan Karski will be concluded by 30 June 2018, being the final approval required for Prairie to submit a Mining Concession application.
Polish Civil Court Grants Injunction in Prairie’s Favour against Poland’s Ministry of Environment
The Regional Civil Court in Warsaw has issued a verdict that forms an injunction preventing the MoE from concluding exploration or mining usufruct agreement(s) regarding the Jan Karski Mine area (including the “Lublin” deposit, as well as the former K-4-5, K-6-7, K-8 and K-9 concession areas) with any party, other than PD Co Sp. z. o.o. (Prairie Mining’s wholly owned Polish subsidiary). The Court has also ordered that the MoE does not grant any concessions (for prospecting, exploration and/or mining) to any party other than PD Co Sp. z. o.o. This highly favourable court ruling was issued in response to Prairie’s application submitted as part of the legal proceedings commenced by Prairie to protect its tenure at Jan Karski.
As a result of the ruling by the Regional Civil Court in Warsaw, security of tenure over the Jan Karski concessions will be safeguarded until full court proceedings have concluded. It is anticipated that full court proceedings could take 12 months or more to complete.
In the justification to the Court’s ruling, the judge stated that: “Based on the evidence one may at this point state that the plaintiff [Prairie Mining] enjoys the right to request conclusion of the requested mining usufruct agreement for the “Lublin” hard coal area (otherwise known as Jan Karski) resulting from Article 15 of the Geological and Mining Law.”
Regional Director for the Environment sets a new deadline for issuing an Environmental Consent Decision
Prairie completed an Environmental and Social Impact Assessment and made submissions to the Lublin Regional Director for the Environment (“RDOS”) for an Environmental Consent decision for Jan Karski in October 2017. RDOS has issued a notice indicating that the Environmental Proceedings in order to issue a decision for Environmental Consent will be concluded by 30 June 2018. RDOS also confirmed receipt of all necessary opinions from other government agencies, including the Regional Water Management Board in Lublin.
Subsequent to the commencement of legal proceedings, Prairie’s team has received a request for additional information from RDOS and, together with the appointed environmental consultants, are working to provide this information, which is expected to be completed within the coming weeks.
For further information, please contact:
Prairie Mining Limited |
Tel: +44 207 478 3900 |
Ben Stoikovich, Chief Executive Officer |
Email: info@pdz.com.au |
Sapan Ghai, Head of Corporate Development |
BACKGROUND
In April 2018, Prairie announced that it had commenced legal action against the MoE for breaching the Polish Geological and Mining Law (2011) (“GML”) in relation to the award of a Mining Usufruct Agreement to Prairie at Jan Karski.
Prairie has provided the MoE with all documents required by Polish Law to conclude a Mining Usufruct Agreement, including the Geological Documentation approval and an official application for a Mining Usufruct Agreement.
To date the MoE has still not provided Prairie with a Mining Usufruct Agreement for Jan Karski.
Based on professional advice, Prairie considers that the MoE has breached the GML and Polish law and is defending its position having commenced legal proceedings against the MoE through the Polish courts to protect its tenure at Jan Karski.
In July 2015, Prairie announced that it had secured the Exclusive Right to apply for a Mining Concession for Jan Karski as a result of its Geological Documentation for the Jan Karski deposit being approved by Poland’s MoE. The approved Geological Documentation covers areas of all four original Exploration Concessions granted to Prairie (K-4-5, K-6-7, K-8 and K-9) and includes the full extent of the targeted resources within the mine plan for Jan Karski. As a result of the Exclusive Right, Prairie was the only entity with a legal right to lodge a Mining Concession application over Jan Karski for the period up and until 2 April 2018. Under the Polish GML, a Mining Concession application comprises the submission of a Deposit Development Plan (“DDP”), approval of a spatial development plan (rezoning of land for mining use) and an Environmental Consent decision. Prairie has previously announced that the DDP and spatial development plans for Jan Karski have already been approved.
However, as of the date of this announcement, Prairie has not yet received the required Environmental Consent decision, which remains pending. Prairie completed an Environmental and Social Impact Assessment and made submissions to RDOS for an Environmental Consent decision in October 2017. Prairie has not been able to apply for a Mining Concession for Jan Karski due to the delay in the issuance of an Environmental Consent decision. The Environmental Consent proceedings continue to progress as discussed above.
The approval of Prairie’s Geological Documentation in 2015 also conferred upon Prairie the legal right to apply for a Mining Usufruct Agreement over Jan Karski for an additional 12-month period beyond April 2018, which precludes any other parties being granted any licence over all or part of the Jan Karski concessions. Under Polish law, the MoE is strictly obligated, within three months of Prairie making an application for a Mining Usufruct Agreement, to grant the agreement. It should be noted that the MoE confirmed Prairie’s priority right in two written statements (i.e. in a final administrative decision dated 11 February 2016 and in a formal letter dated 13 April 2016). Prairie applied to the MoE for a Mining Usufruct Agreement over Jan Karski in late December 2017. As of the date of this announcement the MoE has not made available to Prairie a Mining Usufruct Agreement for Jan Karski, therefore breaching the three-month obligatory period for the agreement to be concluded. Legal advice provided to Prairie concludes that failure of the MoE to grant Prairie the Mining Usufruct Agreement is a breach of Polish law. Accordingly, the Company commenced legal proceedings against the MoE through the Polish courts in order to protect the Company’s security of tenure over the Jan Karski concessions. Since the MoE has not provided a decision within three months regarding Prairie’s Mining Usufruct application, the Polish civil court has the power to enforce conclusion of a Usufruct Agreement in place of the MoE. In the event that a Mining Usufruct Agreement is not made available to the Company on acceptable terms or the Company does not enter into a Mining Usufruct Agreement for any other reason, other parties may be able to apply for exploration or mining rights for all or part of the Jan Karski concession area. However, given that the Civil Court has approved Prairie’s motion for an injunction against the MoE, as described above, the MoE is now prevented from entering into a Usufruct agreement or concession with any other party besides Prairie until the full court proceedings are concluded.
The Company will consider any other actions necessary to ensure its concession rights are reserved which may result in the Company taking further action against the MoE including invoking the protection afforded to the Company under any relevant bi-lateral or multi-lateral investment treaties or such other actions as the Company may consider appropriate at the relevant time.
Prairie will continue to update the market in relation to this matter as required.
Prairie has always conducted its business in Poland in accordance with the Polish law and continues to pioneer the application of international standards for development and feasibility work in Poland necessary to ensure the value of its Tier One coking coal projects are maximised for all stakeholders, meet the rigorous requirements for international financing and can ensure the production of high quality coking coal product to regional European steel makers.
Poland is multi-party representative democracy and has been a member of the European Union since 2004. Prairie Mining has been listed on the Warsaw Stock Exchange since September 2015 and enjoys a strong and increasing Polish shareholder base. Prairie benefits from strong support of local communities and regional governments, and our activities are in line with Polish national government policy that considers coal at the core of Poland’s raw material security, seeks to renew Polish industry and enhance economic development in Eastern Poland, where the Jan Karski Mine is located.
Australia also holds the status of “Most Favoured Nation” with Poland and the countries signed a Promotion and Protection of Investment Agreement in 1991 (a Bilateral Investment Treaty) which provides reciprocal protections for investments made by residents and entities of both countries, including licences for exploration and mining of natural resources. Prairie reserves the right to make future claims against the Polish state under the Promotion and Protection of Investment Agreement.
PRAIRIE’S COKING COAL PROJECTS
DEBIENSKO MINE
The Debiensko Mine (“Debiensko”) is a hard coking coal project located in the Upper Silesian Coal Basin in the south west of the Republic of Poland. It is approximately 40 km from the city of Katowice and 40 km from the Czech Republic.
Debiensko is bordered by the Knurow-Szczyglowice Mine in the north west and the Budryk Mine in the north east, both owned and operated by Jastrzębska Spółka Węglowa SA (“JSW”), Europe’s leading producer of hard coking coal.
The Debiensko mine was originally opened in 1898 and was operated by various Polish mining companies until 2000 when mining operations were terminated due to a major government led restructuring of the coal sector caused by a downturn in global coal prices. In early 2006 New World Resources Plc (“NWR”) acquired Debiensko and commenced planning for Debiensko to comply with Polish mining standards, with the aim of accessing and mining hard coking coal seams.
In October 2016, Prairie acquired Debiensko with a view that a revised development approach would potentially allow for the early mining of profitable premium hard coking coal seams, whilst minimising upfront capital costs. Prairie has proven expertise in defining commercially robust projects and applying international standards in Poland. The fact that Debiensko is a former operating mine and its proximity to two neighbouring coking coal producers in the same geological setting, reaffirms the significant potential to successfully bring Debiensko back into operation.
JAN KARSKI MINE
Jan Karski is a large scale semi-soft coking coal project located in the Lublin Coal Basin in south east Poland. The Lublin Coal Basin is an established coal producing province which is well serviced by modern and highly efficient infrastructure, offering the potential for low capital intensity mine development. Jan Karski is situated adjacent to the Bogdanka coal mine which has been in commercial production since 1982 and is the lowest cost hard coal producer in Europe.
Prairie’s use of modern exploration techniques continues to transform Jan Karski with latest drill results re-affriming the capability of the the project to produce high value ultra-low ash semi-soft coking coal, known as Type 34 coal in Poland.
The coking coal quality results are superior to the drill results announced in May 2017, and further confirm that Jan Karski is a globally significant semi-soft coking coal (“SSCC”) / Type 34 coking coal deposit with the potential to produce a high value ultra-low ash SSCC with a coking coal product split of up to 75%.
Key benefits for the local community and the Lublin and Chelm regions associated with the development, construction and operation of Jan Karski have been recognised as the following:
- creation of 2,000 direct employment positions and 10,000 indirect jobs for the region once operational;
- increasing skills of the workforce and through the implementation of International Standard training programmes;
- stimulating the development of education, health services and communications within the region; and
- building a mine that creates new employment for generations to come and career paths for families to remain in the region.
Prairie Mining #PDZ – JP Morgan increases holding to 5.3%
TR-1: Standard form for notification of major holdings
NOTIFICATION OF MAJOR HOLDINGS (to be sent to the relevant issuer and to the FCA in Microsoft Word format if possible)i |
||||||
1a. Identity of the issuer or the underlying issuer of existing shares to which voting rights are attachedii: |
Prairie Mining Limited |
|||||
1b. Please indicate if the issuer is a non-UK issuer (please mark with an “X” if appropriate) |
||||||
Non-UK issuer |
X |
|||||
2. Reason for the notification (please mark the appropriate box or boxes with an “X”) |
||||||
An acquisition or disposal of voting rights |
X |
|||||
An acquisition or disposal of financial instruments |
||||||
An event changing the breakdown of voting rights |
||||||
Other (please specify)iii: |
||||||
3. Details of person subject to the notification obligationiv |
||||||
Name |
JPMorgan Chase & Co. |
|||||
City and country of registered office (if applicable) |
Wilmington, Delaware, USA |
|||||
4. Full name of shareholder(s) (if different from 3.)v |
||||||
Name |
J.P. Morgan Securities Plc, J.P. Morgan Securities Australia Limited
|
|||||
City and country of registered office (if applicable) |
London, United Kingdom |
|||||
5. Date on which the threshold was crossed or reachedvi: |
06 April 2018 |
|||||
6. Date on which issuer notified (DD/MM/YYYY): |
10 April 2018 |
|||||
7. Total positions of person(s) subject to the notification obligation |
||||||
% of voting rights attached to shares (total of 8. A) |
% of voting rights through financial instruments |
Total of both in % (8.A + 8.B) |
Total number of voting rights of issuervii |
|||
Resulting situation on the date on which threshold was crossed or reached |
5.30% |
0.00% |
5.30% |
167,498,969 |
||
Position of previous notification (if applicable) |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
|||
8. Notified details of the resulting situation on the date on which the threshold was crossed or reachedviii |
||||||
A: Voting rights attached to shares |
||||||
Class/type of ISIN code (if possible) |
Number of voting rightsix |
% of voting rights |
||||
Direct (Art 9 of Directive 2004/109/EC) (DTR5.1) |
Indirect (Art 10 of Directive 2004/109/EC) (DTR5.2.1) |
Direct (Art 9 of Directive 2004/109/EC) (DTR5.1) |
Indirect (Art 10 of Directive 2004/109/EC) (DTR5.2.1) |
|||
AU000000PDZ2 |
8,874,110 |
5.30% |
||||
SUBTOTAL 8. A |
8,874,110 |
5.30% |
||||
|
||||||
B 1: Financial Instruments according to Art. 13(1)(a) of Directive 2004/109/EC (DTR5.3.1.1 (a)) |
||||||
Type of financial instrument |
Expiration |
Exercise/ |
Number of voting rights that may be acquired if the instrument is exercised/converted. |
% of voting rights |
||
SUBTOTAL 8. B 1 |
||||||
B 2: Financial Instruments with similar economic effect according to Art. 13(1)(b) of Directive 2004/109/EC (DTR5.3.1.1 (b)) |
|||||
Type of financial instrument |
Expiration |
Exercise/ |
Physical or cash settlementxii |
Number of voting rights |
% of voting rights |
SUBTOTAL 8.B.2 |
9. Information in relation to the person subject to the notification obligation (please mark the applicable box with an “X”) |
||||
Person subject to the notification obligation is not controlled by any natural person or legal entity and does not control any other undertaking(s) holding directly or indirectly an interest in the (underlying) issuerxiii |
||||
Full chain of controlled undertakings through which the voting rights and/or the |
X |
|||
Namexv |
% of voting rights if it equals or is higher than the notifiable threshold |
% of voting rights through financial instruments if it equals or is higher than the notifiable threshold |
Total of both if it equals or is higher than the notifiable threshold |
|
JPMorgan Chase & Co. |
||||
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association |
||||
J.P. Morgan International Finance Limited |
||||
J.P. Morgan Capital Holdings Limited |
||||
J.P. Morgan Securities plc |
5.10% |
5.10% |
||
10. In case of proxy voting, please identify: |
||||
Name of the proxy holder |
N/A |
|||
The number and % of voting rights held |
N/A |
|||
The date until which the voting rights will be held |
N/A |
|||
11. Additional informationxvi |
||||
Chain of controlled undertakings:
JPMorgan Chase & Co. JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association (100%) J.P. Morgan International Finance Limited (100%) J.P. Morgan Capital Holdings Limited (100%) J.P. Morgan Securities plc (100%)
JPMorgan Chase & Co. JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association (100%) J.P. Morgan International Finance Limited (100%) J.P. Morgan Overseas Capital LLC (100%) J.P. Morgan Australia Group Pty Limited (100%) J.P. Morgan Operations Australia Limited (100%) J.P. Morgan Administrative Services Australia Limited (100%) J.P. Morgan Securities Australia Limited (100%)
|
||||
Place of completion |
London, United Kingdom |
Date of completion |
10 April 2018 |
Prairie Mining #PDZ – Lansdowne Partners Intl increases holding from 5.4% to 6.06%
TR-1: Standard form for notification of major holdings
NOTIFICATION OF MAJOR HOLDINGS (to be sent to the relevant issuer and to the FCA in Microsoft Word format if possible)i |
||||||
1a. Identity of the issuer or the underlying issuer of existing shares to which voting rights are attachedii: |
Prairie Mining Ltd Sedol BYSQ580 |
|||||
1b. Please indicate if the issuer is a non-UK issuer (please mark with an “X” if appropriate) |
||||||
Non-UK issuer |
X |
|||||
2. Reason for the notification (please mark the appropriate box or boxes with an “X”) |
||||||
An acquisition or disposal of voting rights |
||||||
An acquisition or disposal of financial instruments |
X |
|||||
An event changing the breakdown of voting rights |
||||||
Other (please specify)iii: |
||||||
3. Details of person subject to the notification obligationiv |
||||||
Name |
1Lansdowne Partners International Limited 2Lansdowne Partners Limited 3Lansdowne Partners (UK) LLP 4Lansdowne European Equity Master Fund Limited
|
|||||
City and country of registered office (if applicable) |
London, United Kingdom |
|||||
4. Full name of shareholder(s) (if different from 3.)v |
||||||
Name |
n/a |
|||||
City and country of registered office (if applicable) |
n/a |
|||||
5. Date on which the threshold was crossed or reachedvi: |
06/04/2018 |
|||||
6. Date on which issuer notified (DD/MM/YYYY): |
10/04/2018 |
|||||
7. Total positions of person(s) subject to the notification obligation |
||||||
% of voting rights attached to shares (total of 8. A) |
% of voting rights through financial instruments |
Total of both in % (8.A + 8.B) |
Total number of voting rights of issuervii |
|||
Resulting situation on the date on which threshold was crossed or reached |
6.06% |
6.06% |
167,498,969 |
|||
Position of previous notification (if applicable) |
5.40% |
5.40% |
||||
8. Notified details of the resulting situation on the date on which the threshold was crossed or reachedviii |
|||||||||
A: Voting rights attached to shares |
|||||||||
Class/type of ISIN code (if possible) |
Number of voting rightsix |
% of voting rights |
|||||||
Direct (Art 9 of Directive 2004/109/EC) (DTR5.1) |
Indirect (Art 10 of Directive 2004/109/EC) (DTR5.2.1) |
Direct (Art 9 of Directive 2004/109/EC) (DTR5.1) |
Indirect (Art 10 of Directive 2004/109/EC) (DTR5.2.1) |
||||||
SUBTOTAL 8. A |
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
B 1: Financial Instruments according to Art. 13(1)(a) of Directive 2004/109/EC (DTR5.3.1.1 (a)) |
|||||||||
Type of financial instrument |
Expiration |
Exercise/ |
Number of voting rights that may be acquired if the instrument is exercised/converted. |
% of voting rights |
|||||
SUBTOTAL 8. B 1 |
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
B 2: Financial Instruments with similar economic effect according to Art. 13(1)(b) of Directive 2004/109/EC (DTR5.3.1.1 (b)) |
|||||||||
Type of financial instrument |
Expiration |
Exercise/ |
Physical or cash settlementxii |
Number of voting rights |
% of voting rights |
||||
CFD |
n/a |
n/a |
Cash |
10,154,610 |
6.06% |
||||
SUBTOTAL 8.B.2 |
10,154,610 |
6.06% |
|||||||
|
|||||||||
9. Information in relation to the person subject to the notification obligation (please mark the applicable box with an “X”) |
||||
Person subject to the notification obligation is not controlled by any natural person or legal entity and does not control any other undertaking(s) holding directly or indirectly an interest in the (underlying) issuerxiii |
||||
Full chain of controlled undertakings through which the voting rights and/or the |
X |
|||
Namexv |
% of voting rights if it equals or is higher than the notifiable threshold |
% of voting rights through financial instruments if it equals or is higher than the notifiable threshold |
Total of both if it equals or is higher than the notifiable threshold |
|
Lansdowne Partners International Limited |
6.06% |
6.06% |
||
Lansdowne Partners Limited |
||||
Lansdowne Partners (UK) LLP |
6.06% |
6.06% |
||
Lansdowne European Equity Master Fund Limited |
5.17% |
5.17% |
||
10. In case of proxy voting, please identify: |
||||
Name of the proxy holder |
||||
The number and % of voting rights held |
||||
The date until which the voting rights will be held |
||||
11. Additional informationxvi |
||||
Place of completion |
London |
Date of completion |
10 April 2018 |