Home » Articles posted by Arjun Thakkar

Author Archives: Arjun Thakkar

Does EV and battery tech really sound the death knell for Oil and Gas?

Future of Oil and Gas

In an era of rising demand and hype for electric vehicles (EV) and battery technology, commodities and ETFs linked to oil and gas have managed to hold their prices. EV stocks like Tesla and Nio have increased by 71% and 100% respectively in the past year. The price of WTI Crude Oil has also increased by 76%, while prices of micro-cap oil stocks like #ECHO Echo Energy and #MSMN Mosman Oil and Gas have increased by 58% and 13% respectively.

This clearly signifies that even after the rise in demand of EVs, commodities like oil and gas are here to stay in the short and long term.

Consumers are under the impression that they could be in an oil-free world by 2030 and most consumers perceive batteries and electricity as the primary source of energy. However, this is highly unlikely and nothing but a series of myths planted in our brains due to effective marketing.

The International Energy Agency (IEA) that analyses trends in energy industry, released its annual World Energy Outlook in November 2019. It looks at potential energy demand and supply under different scenarios to explore different possible futures. The IEA scenario stated a global increase in energy demand by 24% by 2040 of which, oil and natural gas will supply 64% of the world’s energy needs. In accordance with the Paris Climate Agreement, if based on the Sustainable Development Scenario, the oil and natural gas will still supply 47% of the world’s energy by 2040.

More than 15% of oil demand goes into non-combusted use including petrochemicals which is expected to grow to 20% by 2040. Even if the demand for gasoline and other fuels may hypothetically be on the decline, the petrochemical sector, in contrast, still has room to grow. Some major companies have even pledged some $100bn into the petrochemical industry over the next decade.

Developing countries like India have one of the most aggressive renewable power capacity roll-out programmes worldwide. However, its access to affordable fossil fuels remains a priority for its government because its needs for cheap oil, gas and coal continue to rise to meet energy demand that is forecast to more than double by 2040. India’s petroleum minister Dharmendra Pradhan believes the world’s third-largest oil consumer could be the “golden goose” for crude suppliers as it buys more than 80% of its oil needs from foreign crude purchases.

The graph below demonstrates that the forecasted oil demand for 2040 is higher than present day with non-combusted being the driver to increase the demand. While in the primary energy consumption chart, oil is forecasted to maintain its consumption as a primary source by 2040. Whereas the primary consumption of gas is forecasted to rise.

 

(Financial Review, 2020)

 

Texas Oil Wells

In 2018, companies in the Permian Basin – “an ancient, oil-rich seabed that spans West Texas and South Eastern New Mexico — were producing twice as much oil as they had four years earlier” whilst forecasters expected the production to double again by 2023.

The International Energy Agency (IEA) had also predicted that American oil mostly from the Permian will account for 80% of growth in global supply over the next seven years.

Some small companies already had presence in the Permian Basin before these predictions and report in 2018. In 2017, Mosman Oil & Gas (MSMN) acquired several oil and gas leases comprising the Welch Permian Basin Project for a consideration of $310,000. Although the Welch project contributed to a gross profit of $167,000 in the year ended 30 June 2020, recently Mosman sold this Welch Project for $420,000 receiving a premium of 40% from the sale of the project alone.

Mosman is steadily growing its working interests across a number of projects in Texas, including Stanley, Falcon-1, Winters and Galaxie. These have produced a gross profit of over $500,000 in the 2020 year. Stanley also has a 100% success rate with oil production from four wells drilled to date.

Texas wells are providing high returns to oil companies, and with a growing number of projects and acreage, Mosman is well placed for future growth.

South Argentina Oil Wells

Many companies own wells in Argentina and Latin America as it is considered a region rich in resources with 4% of natural gas reserves and 20% of world oil reserves. They are also often undergoing positive development in macro conditions. A strong demand outlook for energy consumption and economic growth coupled with underdeveloped – but lower cost – onshore plays, makes Latin America a favourable region for companies like Echo Energy (ECHO) to deploy its expertise in support of an exploration-led growth strategy.

For the financial year ended 31 December 2020, Santa Cruz Sur at the south-eastern tip of Argentina helped Echo Energy to increase its revenue fourfold to US $11.1mn. This was also due to Echo securing new gas sales contracts at premium rates to the prevailing spot markets in early Q1 2021.

The increase in revenue drove an significant increase in the Echo Energy (ECHO) stock price by 51% from 55p to 83p between December 2020 and January 2021.

Major and Small Suppliers of Oil and Gas

The difference between the barrels of oil supplied can be huge when major suppliers are compared to the small suppliers. But all that glitters is not gold. High supply and production would require a higher demand to be profitable, if the demand of oil stagnates in the future it will affect the major suppliers before the small suppliers.

The big 10 companies accounted for 28% of global oil production in 2020 as shown below.

When this is compared to small oil producers like Echo Energy and Mosman Oil and Gas,  Echo Energy produced a cumulative of 94,000 barrels of oil in Santa Cruz Sur in South Argentina. While Mosman Oil and Gas produced a gross of 90,000 barrels of oil in the year ended June 2020. Based on available data, the production of Echo and Mosman combined is 0.2% of the global oil demand.

This is effective during times of recession or when the global demand is low as during unprecedented times a major oil supplier to generate profits and work at full capacity would need to sell between 5-12% of oil demand while small suppliers of oil would need to fulfil a negligible percentage of global demand of oil to turn profitable. This is due to high storing and inventory costs for major oil suppliers as well as higher fixed costs due to bigger operations.

Conclusion

Therefore, even though the oil demand is perceived to be lower in the future due to alternative resources, the demand doesn’t seem to be in decline due to oil having uses other than fuel and gas for cars and transportation like non-combusted petrochemicals. Even if the demand for oil is on the decline it would not affect small oil suppliers; as working at full capacity they fulfil just a small percentage of global oil demand and still manage to make hefty profits.

These among many, are the reasons keeping the oil prices buoyant and in the mix, not only for the present day but also for the future.

#BRES Blencowe Resources Plc – Update on Orom-Cross Graphite Project

Blencowe is pleased to deliver an update to the market in regards to work streams progressing on the Company’s flagship Orom-Cross graphite project in Uganda.

Highlights

  • Phase Two drilling program was completed in early August; all samples have been prepped and are in transit to laboratories in Australia for assaying.
  • Blencowe continues to target a revised, upgraded JORC Standard Resource statement in Q4 2021.
  • Preliminary Economic Assessment (“PEA”) for the initial proposed mining operation at Orom-Cross is considerably advanced and should be completed before 30 September 2021 with public release shortly thereafter.
  • Forthcoming PEA to be first full commercial model for entire project and will indicate how valuable the Orom-Cross project is on a global scale.

The Orom-Cross project is now developing into an outstanding graphite project based on the recent project milestones achieved and other factors including:

  • Significant size and scale of the overall deposit will allow substantial future uplifts to production levels to meet anticipated surges in graphite demand;
  • Highest quality 97-98% concentrate verified by leading independent metallurgical test expert, SGS Lakefield in Canada;
  • Low risk location to develop a long-term mining operation, with stable Government in Uganda supportive of the mining industry;
  • Strong community support;
  • Advanced project, with 21-year Mining License already awarded; and
  • Opportunity to develop Orom-Cross into a battery metals market that is forecast to grow considerably over next decade, as lithium-ion batteries become highly sought after to power exponential growth in electric vehicles (EVs). Graphite is a key component of the lithium-ion battery.

Cameron Pearce, Executive Chairman commented:

“The Company has made considerable progress over the past sixteen months since Orom-Cross was acquired and is now about to deliver a first economic model to share with the market. 

We are confident that the PEA will underline the value that has been built to date and outline further upside that Orom-Cross can become a globally significant graphite project due to its scale and mineralogy.

The PEA will also begin the process of allowing investors to assess the project in the context of it’s global peer group and provide a robust framework for us to progress strategic discussions already initiated with a range of parties such as potential offtake agreements and strategic partnerships.  We also look forward to delivering our revised JORC Resource Statement in the fourth quarter of this year.

Following delivery of the PEA we will then seek to progress to a pre-feasibility study (“PFS”) to ensure that we further de-risk the investment decision as we drive towards first production.”

Background to PEA

The completion of the PEA by the end of month comes as a result of a range of key achievements Blencowe has delivered on to date, both in terms of timing and budget, and most specifically the initial JORC Standard Resource statement, the second drilling campaign to further delineate a greater part of these resources to a lower risk category (Indicated and Measured status) and the exceptional metallurgical test results announced in the middle of the year.

The PEA has been built up internally by Blencowe’s management team who have significant experience in this regard, with a stated purpose to be accurate but conservative. However all key numbers within the PEA have been generated via the involvement of third party technical experts to ensure credibility and integrity.

The next step beyond PEA will be for the PFS to commence, which will ultimately be signed off by a third party technical firm.  As part of the PFS Blencowe will be opening dialogue with potential offtake partners on quantity, quality and pricing of end products as available for sale.

 

For further information please contact:

  Blencowe Resources Plc

Sam Quinn

www.blencoweresourcesplc.com

Tel: +44 (0)1624 681 250

info@blencoweresourcesplc.com

 

Investor Relations

Sasha Sethi

Tel: +44 (0) 7891 677 441

sasha@flowcomms.com

 

Brandon Hill Capital Limited

Jonathan Evans

Tel: +44 (0)20 3463 5000

jonathan.evans@brandonhillcapital.com

 

First Equity Limited

Jason Robertson

Tel: +44(0)20 7330 1833

jasonrobertson@firstequitylimited.com

 

 

Twitter https://twitter.com/BlencoweRes

LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/company/72382491/admin/

 

Background

Orom-Cross is a potential world class graphite project both by size and end-product quality, with a high component of more valuable larger flakes within the deposit. A 21-year Mining Licence for the project was issued by the Ugandan Government in 2019 following extensive historical work on the deposit and Blencowe is moving into the studies phase shortly as it drives towards first production.

Orom-Cross presents as a large, shallow open-pitable deposit, with a maiden JORC Indicated & Inferred Mineral Resource deposit of 16.3Mt @ 6.0% Total Graphite Content. Development of the resource is expected to benefit from a low strip ratio and free dig operations, thereby ensuring lower operating and capital costs.

Gold – The Timeless Currency!

Gold retaining value
The price of gold on May 1st 2021 was $1,767/oz which then rose to $1,910 in just one month. However are these changes in price normal? Yes, in the short term the price of gold can rise or fall although in the long term gold has a reputation of being a timeless currency!

For example, according to National Bureau of Economic Research – 2,000 years ago a centurion (roughly equivalent to a captain) received 38.58 ounces of gold per year (equivalent to $46,296 per year @$1,200/oz) while currently a U.S. Army captain receives about 37.11 ounces of gold (equivalent to $44,532 per year @1,200/oz). This is a perfect example of gold holding its value.

 

What influences the price of gold?

Monetary policies, economic data and demand and supply work hand-in-hand to determine the price of gold and the sustained growth in the gold price is driven by these factors and other small factors like ETF’s.

For example, during the covid-19 pandemic the economic data showed higher unemployment, stagnant GDP and slowdown of the economy. This led to most of the world economies to change their monetary policies to reduce their interest rate to the bare minimum. The interest rate is an opportunity cost to gold for investors as investors will invest where they receive most interest. During a very low interest rate period, investor will buy gold and thus increasing the demand of gold and driving up the prices during the times of slowdowns or recessions.

In order to satisfy this demand, companies listed on AIM and London Stock Exchange like #ECR -ECR Minerals PLC and #POW – Power Metal Resources Ltd are undertaking gold mining projects in gold rich countries like Australia.

 

powPower Metal Resources #POW

Power Metal Resources has a 49.9% in private company Red Rock Australasia Pty Ltd (RRAL). RRAL has a portfolio of five exciting gold projects in the heart of the prolific world-class high-grade Victoria Goldfields which have produced 80+Moz Au historically.

In Western Australia, notably the Paterson Province in the eastern Pilbara Region, Power Metal Resources has a conditional agreement to acquire a 75% strategic interest in (FDR Australia).

FDR Australia holds a portfolio of copper-gold focused exploration interests in the Paterson Province, which is considered highly prospective for gold-copper and base metal mineral systems and is currently of particular focus for resource companies with a significant level of exploration activity underway across the region. Companies such as Rio Tinto are developing the Winu gold project, set to come into production by 2024, while the valuation of Greatland Gold #GGP rocketed from around £25m to highs around £1.3bn following a spectacular gold discovery at its Havieron project. This is now being jointly developed with Newcrest Mining.

 

ECR Minerals PLC #ECR

ECR Minerals’ Bailieston and Creswick projects are the epicentre of the current gold exploration boom in Victoria.

Bailieston is located approximately 150km north of the Victorian state capital Melbourne, with good road access which hosts successful modern gold mines including the world-class Fosterville gold mine owned by Kirkland Lake Gold.

After announcing the initial results from its first drilling campaign at Bailieston, ECR has continued drilling and exploring across the territory, and has most recently announced the acquisition of a 297 acre land package near to the Cherry Tree project on the Bailieston license area. Here the company plans to develop a mine decline, processing plant and tailings dam

The Creswick project is considered highly prospective for gold mineralisation, hosting the Dimocks Main Shale geological feature, which extends over a 15km trend from the mining centre of Ballarat to the south, through ECR’s exploration licenses and applications.

A raft of drilling and data from the campaign has supplied ECR’s geological team with a much deeper understanding of the prospectivity of the trend across the license areas, and a few weeks back the board to the decision to acquire property at Brewing Lane, Springmount to further advance drilling programmes and to eventually develop a mine decline.

These two companies are among many other’s operating, exploring and discovering new mineral resources in Australia’s exceptionally fertile territories.

How does supply affect gold prices?

Such aggressive drilling programmes and significant level of exploration activity are planned in order to cater the high demand for gold. The higher supply now shifts the supply curve outward hence reaching a new equilibrium. This is shown below:

The outward shift of both, demand from D1 to D2 and supply side for S1 to S2 has resulted in a new increased price equilibrium from P1 to P2.

This increase in price of gold is a win-win for the supplier, stakeholders of the suppliers and the consumers. As the increase in demand is being satisfied by the increase in supply by the suppliers. While for the suppliers, they are receiving a higher price of the commodity for a larger amount sold.
This is what is known as ‘economic welfare’.

All in all, gold is an investment for the long term and factors like monetary policies, economic conditions and demand and supply play a major role to determine the prices. Gold might be a volatile commodity in the short term but it is by far the safest bet over the medium and long term.

And for investors preferring to mitigate risk from direct exposure to the yellow metal, owning shares in gold exploration and production companies can result in less direct volatility, but can potentially deliver much more upside if a gold discovery such as Greatland Gold’s Havieron project is made.

#MNRG MetalNRG Plc – TR-1: Standard form for notification of major holdings

TR-1: Standard form for notification of major holdings

1. Issuer Details

ISIN

GB00B15FS791

Issuer Name

METALNRG PLC

UK or Non-UK Issuer

UK

2. Reason for Notification

An acquisition or disposal of voting rights

3. Details of person subject to the notification obligation

Name

Edward Peter John Spencer

City of registered office (if applicable)

Milton Keynes

Country of registered office (if applicable)

United Kingdom

4. Details of the shareholder

Name

City of registered office

Country of registered office

Edward Peter John Spencer & Sarah Louise Spencer

5. Date on which the threshold was crossed or reached

08-Sep-2021

6. Date on which Issuer notified

08-Sep-2021

7. Total positions of person(s) subject to the notification obligation

% of voting rights attached to shares (total of 8.A)

% of voting rights through financial instruments (total of 8.B 1 + 8.B 2)

Total of both in % (8.A + 8.B)

Total number of voting rights held in issuer

Resulting situation on the date on which threshold was crossed or reached

10.000000

0.000000

10.000000

101021946

Position of previous notification (if applicable)

9.210000

0.000000

9.210000

8. Notified details of the resulting situation on the date on which the threshold was crossed or reached

8A. Voting rights attached to shares

Class/Type of shares ISIN code(if possible)

Number of direct voting rights (DTR5.1)

Number of indirect voting rights (DTR5.2.1)

% of direct voting rights (DTR5.1)

% of indirect voting rights (DTR5.2.1)

GB00B15FS791

101021946

10.000000

Sub Total 8.A

101021946

10.000000%

8B1. Financial Instruments according to (DTR5.3.1R.(1) (a))

Type of financial instrument

Expiration date

Exercise/conversion period

Number of voting rights that may be acquired if the instrument is exercised/converted

% of voting rights

Sub Total 8.B1

8B2. Financial Instruments with similar economic effect according to (DTR5.3.1R.(1) (b))

Type of financial instrument

Expiration date

Exercise/conversion period

Physical or cash settlement

Number of voting rights

% of voting rights

Sub Total 8.B2

9. Information in relation to the person subject to the notification obligation

1. Person subject to the notification obligation is not controlled by any natural person or legal entity and does not control any other undertaking(s) holding directly or indirectly an interest in the (underlying) issuer.

Ultimate controlling person

Name of controlled undertaking

% of voting rights if it equals or is higher than the notifiable threshold

% of voting rights through financial instruments if it equals or is higher than the notifiable threshold

Total of both if it equals or is higher than the notifiable threshold

10. In case of proxy voting

Name of the proxy holder

The number and % of voting rights held

The date until which the voting rights will be held

 

11. Additional Information

12. Date of Completion

08-Sep-2021

13. Place Of Completion

London

Open Orphan #ORPH – Notice of Results, Analyst Briefing and Investor Presentation

Open Orphan (AIM: ORPH), a rapidly growing specialist contract research organisation (CRO) and world leader in vaccine and antiviral testing using human challenge clinical trials , announces that its interim results for the six-month period ended 30 June 2021 will be released on Monday, 20 September 2021.

Analyst Briefing

A briefing open to analysts will take place remotely via video conference call on Monday 20 September at 9.30am (BST). If you would like the details of this call, please contact Walbrook PR on openorphan@walbrookpr.com. 

Investor Presentation

Cathal Friel, Executive Chairman, and Leo Toole, Chief Financial Officer, will provide a live presentation relating to the interim results via the Investor Meet Company platform on Monday, 20 September 2021 at 6.00pm (BST).

The presentation is open to all existing and potential shareholders. Questions can be submitted pre-event via your Investor Meet Company dashboard up until 9am the day before the meeting or at any time during the live presentation.

Investors can sign up to Investor Meet Company for free and add to meet Open Orphan plc via:

https://www.investormeetcompany.com/open-orphan-plc/register-investor

Investors who already follow Open Orphan plc on the Investor Meet Company platform will automatically be invited. 

For further information please contact:

 

Open Orphan plc

+353 (0) 1 644 0007

Cathal Friel, Executive Chairman

Arden Partners plc (Nominated Adviser and Joint Broker)

  +44 (0) 20 7614 5900

John Llewellyn-Lloyd / Louisa Waddell / Oscair McGrath

finnCap plc (Joint Broker)

+44 (0) 20 7220 0500

Geoff Nash / James Thompson/ Richard Chambers

Davy (Euronext Growth Adviser and Joint Broker)

+353 (0) 1 679 6363

Anthony Farrell

Walbrook PR (Financial PR & IR)

+44 (0)20 7933 8780 or openorphan@walbrookpr.com

Paul McManus/ Sam Allen/ Louis Ashe-Jepson

+44 (0)7980 541 893 / +44 (0) 7502 558 258 / +44 (0) 7747 515393 

 

Notes to Editors 

Open Orphan plc  (London and Euronext: ORPH) is a rapidly growing pharmaceutical service/contract research company that is a world leader in testing vaccines and antivirals using human challenge clinical trials. The company provides services to Big Pharma, biotech and government/public health organisations. 

Open Orphan runs challenge studies in London from both its 19-bedroom Whitechapel quarantine clinic, opened in February 2021, and its 24-bedroom QMB clinic with its highly specialised on-site virology and immunology laboratory. Open Orphan has a leading portfolio of human challenge study models for infectious and respiratory diseases and is developing a number of other models including the world’s first COVID-19 human challenge study model as part of the Human Challenge Programme .

Building upon its many years of challenge studies and virology research, the Company is developing an in-depth database of infectious disease progression data. Based on the Company’s Disease in Motion® platform, this unique dataset includes clinical, immunological, virological and digital (wearable) biomarkers. The Disease in Motion platform has many potential applications across a wide variety of end users including big technology, wearables, pharma and biotech companies. Following COVID-19 there is now a renewed interest and investment in infectious diseases.

Open Orphan’s Paris office has been providing biometry, data management and statistics to its many European pharmaceutical clients for over 20 years. For over 15 years, the Company’s Netherlands office has been providing drug development consultancy and services, including CMC (chemistry, manufacturing and controls), PK and medical writing, to a broad range of European clients. Both offices are now also fully integrated with the London office and working on challenge study contracts as well as supporting third party trial  contracts .

Bitcoin – Get Rich or Ponzi scheme?

When you hear the words “Bitcoin” or “Dogecoin” what is the first thing that pops up in your mind? I am sure Elon Musk is the first thought for many.

A Musk tweet on the 16th of May 2021 led to a 20% downfall of Bitcoin. The tweet implied that Tesla has sold all of its Bitcoins. The downfall of Bitcoin was halted the next day, soon after Elon Musk tweeted again stating that Tesla had not sold any Bitcoin. A couple of weeks later, Musk tweeted a heart break emoji captioning it “#Bitcoin”; the saga of the downfall of bitcoin had begun again! It didn’t end till Musk made a U-turn on his statements tweeting that Tesla would in fact accept Bitcoin.

But one has to ask, does Elon Musk really control the cryptocurrency market? The answer is both yes and no.

The market price of cryptocurrencies are derived by the basic fundamentals of economics, which is demand and supply. Demand being proportional and supply being inversely proportional to the price of these intangible assets. While some cryptos like Bitcoin have a limited supply, for example 21 million bitcoins, others like Ethereum don’t have an explicit cap on their supply.

Whilst most cryptocurrencies can be manipulated in the short term, bitcoin having a limited supply makes it easier for Elon Musk to control Bitcoin prices in the long term when compared to Ethereum. Most investors believe that most financial markets are semi-strong efficient and that some individuals have more knowledge than that of the general public. Therefore, retail investors lie their trust in Elon Musk because of his billionaire status as well as being the CEO of Tesla, believing that due to those factors he possesses more market information than the market and can control the market sentiments.

On the other hand, many would argue that Elon Musk has no role in the constant change of the price of Bitcoin, and the tweets were posted after institutional or big investors had already started trading bitcoin. This can be proven by looking at the Bitcoin technical chart which was following the Wyckoff Accumulation pattern.

The Wyckoff accumulation pattern has 5 phases where the price fluctuates in a range. The higher bounds of the range are known as resistance while the lower bounds of the range are known as support. In phase A there is intense selling pressure which results to the price going below the support, after which it rebounds to the resistance before testing the support again. Phase B leads to the price falling further than the lows of phase A, before shortly rebounding. Phase C is a crucial phase where for one final time, it tests the support also known as the spring and that is where the rally begins. Phase D and E occur when prices move in a bullish pattern, finally breaking the resistance to move further up.

The Wyckoff accumulation stage looks something like this –

Source: Reddit.com

The negative tweets by Elon Musk for Bitcoin came during phase A and B while the positive ones came during phase C and D which many people believe is purely co-incidental.

The bitcoin pattern showed below between May 2021 to June 2021 followed the Wyckoff Accumulation stage. Between May 2021 and June 2021 Elon Musk tweeted about cryptocurrency 12 times.

Source: Tradingview.com

There are many people who have termed Elon Musk as a “Doge God” and believe he played an instrumental role in the high volatile prices of Bitcoin while individual and institutional technical analysts believed Musk’s tweets just came at the right time and the changes in prices were due to the Wyckoff accumulation stage. Does Musk control the cryptocurrency market? Will Bitcoin, Ethereum or Doge Coin continue its bullish run? The future will surely tell.

 

I would like to receive Brand Communications updates and news...
Free Stock Updates & News
I agree to have my personal information transfered to MailChimp ( more information )
Join over 3.000 visitors who are receiving our newsletter and learn how to optimize your blog for search engines, find free traffic, and monetize your website.
We hate spam. Your email address will not be sold or shared with anyone else.